Frunze. Red Napoleon

43
Smoot. 1919 year. The decisive role in the counteroffensive on the Eastern Front was played by the Southern Army Group led by Frunze, who was preparing a flank counterattack during the offensive of Kolchak. Frunze - Red Napoleon, a unique red commander, noble and cruel, prudent, possessing a rare intuition.

"All to fight with Kolchak!"


The offensive of the Western Army Khanzhin led to the breakthrough of the center of the Eastern Front of the Red Army. The Eastern Front became the main for Moscow. The strategic reserves of the main command were directed east: the 2 Rifle Division, the 2 rifle brigades (the 10 Rifle Division from Vyatka, and the Bryansk Rifle Division from Bryansk) and 4 thou. Also, the Eastern Front command was handed over the 22 th rifle division (it was formed in Kazan), and the 35 th rifle division pulled up from the Vyatka direction.



12 April 1919 published the “Theses of the Central Committee of the RCP (b) in connection with the position of the Eastern Front” written by Vladimir Lenin ”, which became the combat program of the party’s work on mobilizing the country's forces and means to defeat Kolchak’s army. Lenin put forward the slogan "Everything to fight against Kolchak!" Hastily created a powerful Samara fortified area led by Karbyshev. This talented military engineer also prepared a system of "anti-attack" defense of Orenburg and Uralsk.

By May 1, replenishment arrived on the red eastern front - 17,5 thousand people, in May - 40,5 thousand people, including 7,5 thousand communists. Weapon, ammunition, equipment, first of all, were sent to the Eastern Front. By 1 in May, the number of troops of the Eastern Front of the Red Army was increased to 143 thousand, with 511 guns and more than 2400 machine guns. The Reds were superior in strength.

Frunze. Red Napoleon

Admiral A.V. Kolchak (sitting), head of the British mission, General Alfred Knox, and British officers on the Eastern Front. 1919

Red Napoleon


The decisive role on the Eastern Front was to be played by the Southern Army Group led by Frunze, which, during the offensive of Kolchak, fully retained its combat capability. It is worth noting the role of Mikhail Vasilyevich Frunze in these events. It was a unique person. He started off as a classic revolutionary: revolutionary activity, participation in the Moscow uprising 1905 of the year, arrests, hard labor, flight, life on a fake passport. Chairman of the Minsk Council of Deputies in 1917. Participated in November 1917 of the year in battles in Moscow, in 1918 year - the chairman of the Ivanovo-Voznesensky Provincial Committee of the RCP (b) and the military commissar Ivanovo-Voznesenskaya. After the suppression of the Yaroslavl uprising - the military commissioner of the Yaroslavl military district.

In January, 1919 of the year was sent to the Eastern Front to fight the Ural white casings. Headed 4 th army. Frunze was a sober, tough and very calculating man. His idol was the great eastern commander Tamerlane, Frunze himself reminded him of something. He was a talented commander, and by nature, without a corresponding military education and military experience, command of regiments, divisions and corps. He had a rare intuition, knew how to find extraordinary solutions, sometimes he took risks and always won. On the one hand, he showed cruelty, on the other - chivalry and humanism.

He quickly brought order to the 4 Red Army, which took Uralsk, began to decompose. The soldiers did not want to go to the steppe in winter, to storm Cossack villages. In an attempt to restore discipline, the soldiers responded with riots, killed a member of the Revolutionary Military Council, Lindov, representatives of the central government Mayorov and Mägi. Frunze forgave the rebels, even the murderers of high-ranking officials. He won the authority of the commander. In February, 1919, the 4-I army deeply wedged between the forces of the Orenburg and Ural Cossacks, advancing on the line Lbishchensk - Iletsk - Orsk. The path to Turkestan was open. The shock 25 Division was re-created under Chapaev. On the basis of several scattered units that broke through from Turkestan, Frunze formed the Turkestan army. He became commander of the Southern Army Group. She was aimed at defeating the Ural and Orenburg white Cossacks.

When the offensive of Kolchak’s army began and the 5-I front of the Red Army collapsed in the center of the front, Frunze stopped the advance of the Southern Army Group and immediately began to regroup its troops in order to consolidate its position in the Orenburg sector and create a reserve. From the 4 Army (22 and 25 Division, to 16 thousand people), which held the front against the Ural White Cossacks, he took the 25 Division, and the army went on the defensive. The Turkestan army (12 thousand fighters) was to protect the Orenburg region and keep in touch with Turkestan. She strengthened a brigade 25-th division. Two other brigades of the 25 division were sent to the Samara region, a communications hub for Ufa and Orenburg. In the future, the 4 and Turkestan army restrained the offensive of the Orenburg and Ural White armies.

The right flank of the 1 Army (24 Division) in early April 1919 successfully developed the attack on the Trinity. The left flank of the 1 Army (20 division) tried to organize a counter-attack in the Sterlitamak area and sent one brigade to cover Belebey. However, the Reds were defeated in the Sterlitamak area. 4 - April 5 White took Sterlitamak and April 6 - Belebey, threatening the rear of the 1 Army. As a result, the left flank of the 1 Army was unable to support the defeated 5 Army, and the right flank stopped the attack. Under the cover of the remnants of the 20 division, which held back the enemy's onslaught to the south in the region of Belebey, the 24 division was successfully pulled back. The withdrawal of the 1 Army forced the units of the Turkestan Army to also retreat. K 18 - 20 April 1919, the new front of the Turkestan army passed through the line Aktyubinsk - Ilinskaya - Vozdvizhenskaya. Frunze also transferred his reserve to the Orenburg - Buzuluk area.

Thus, the red commander Frunze was able to avoid defeat, took back the retreating troops in time, regrouped his forces, strengthened his left wing (avoiding the threat of White’s breakthrough to the rear of the Southern group), and created a reserve. Thus, the foundations were created for the future counter-offensive of the Red Army.


Red Commander Mikhail Frunze, 1919 Year

Red Command Plans


As the battle developed, the plan of the counter-offensive of the Red Army was ripening. At first, he was seen as a flank counterblow of the Southern Army Group along the left wing of the enemy's attack force. Frunze proposed to strike from the area of ​​Buzuluk, from where it was possible to act in several directions. Moscow adopted his plan. 7 On April 1919, the command of the Eastern Front began to outline the concentration of the entire 1 Army in the Buzuluk-Sharluk area, which would attack the enemy advancing in the direction of Buguruslan-Samara.

9 April The Revolutionary Military Council of the Eastern Front expanded the operational framework of the Southern Army Group; it now included the broken 5, weakened 1, Turkestan and 4 armies. Her commander Frunze received almost complete freedom of action. Red Napoleon planned to launch an offensive depending on the end of the regrouping of his forces, before the end of the spring thaw or after it.

April 10 in Kazan held a meeting of the High Command. The southern group was ordered to strike from the south to the north and smash the whites, continuing to thrust the 5 army. At the same time, the Northern Army Group was formed as part of the 3 and 2 of the Red armies under the overall command of Shorin's 2 Army. The Northern Army Group was supposed to smash the Siberian Army of Hyde. The boundary line between the two army groups was drawn through the Birsk and Chistopol and the mouth of the Kama.

The situation at the front by mid-April 1919 was already in favor of the Reds. The striking power of the Russian army of Kolchak was already weakened, exhausted, its corps dispersed a great distance, lost contact with each other, the rear was lagging behind, the slaughter slowed down. The eastern front of the Red Army was declared the main one. His strength was constantly growing, both quantitatively and qualitatively. Thousands of Communists arrived at the party mobilization. In the Permian and Sarapulian directions, the forces of the enemy were already approximately equal: 37 thousand red fighters against 34 thousand white. In the central direction, the Khanzhin strike force still had an advantage: 40 thousand White Guards against 24 thousand Reds. But here the situation has changed a lot, at the beginning of the offensive White had a quadruple superiority, now it has significantly decreased. At the same time, the army of Khanzhin greatly stretched the front. Having taken Buguruslan on April 15, whites stretched their front by 250-300 kilometers, having the left wing southeast of Buguruslan and the right wing at Kama. On the southern wing of the Western army, Belov’s Southern Army Group, which was detained in the Orenburg direction by the resistance of the 1st Red Army of Guy, was far behind.


A detachment of communists, formed by the Kaluga Provincial Committee of the RCP (b) to be sent to the Eastern Front. 1919

Concentration of the shock group


As conceived by Frunze, the Turkestan and 4 armies were to keep defenses in the Orenburg and Ural directions. The 5 Army had to stop the White Guard advance in the direction of Buguruslan and along the Bugulma railway, covering the Buzuluk-Buguruslan-Bugulma line. The strike group of the 1 Army will strike the left wing of the enemy's attack force, throwing it northward. 20-Infantry Division regrouped, also 24-I “Iron Division” (without one brigade) was transferred to this direction, it had to hold down the enemy with his active actions, gain time to concentrate the main forces of the attack group in the Buuluk area. The best forces of the Southern group concentrated in the strike fist: the 1-th rifle division and the brigade of the 31-th cavalry division were transferred from the Turkestan to the 3 Army; a brigade of the 24 th rifle division was also deployed (to the area of ​​Art. Totskaya), and from the strategic reserve of Frunze - the 75 th rifle brigade (2 regiment). Another reserve team - 73-I, was transferred to the area with. Bezvodnovki to cover the concentration of the shock group, and also was part of it. Another brigade remained in reserve, which could also strengthen the strike group.

The 5 Army — the weakened 26 Army, the 27 Army Divisions, the Orenburg Division and part of the 35 Army Division, had at that time about 11,5 thousand bayonets and sabers, 72 guns. The Frunze strike group included almost all the forces of the 1 Army (except for the 20 Infantry Division) - 24, 25, 31 Infantry Divisions and the 3 Cavalry Brigade. Shock fist numbered 24 bayonets and sabers with 80 guns. That is, Frunze had to attack about 36 thousand fighters near 150 guns. On the rest of the Southern Army Group front, about 700 km long, about 22,5 thousands of soldiers defended with 80 guns: parts of the 20 and 22 divisions, the remaining troops of the Turkestan Army and local units in Orenburg, Uralsk and Iletsk.

It is worth noting that Frunze was at great risk. He concentrated his main and best forces (including the 25 th Chapaevskaya, the 24 th Iron, the 31 th division, the Orenburg cavalry brigade) for the flank counter attack on the Khanzhin army. At the same time, in the south, the huge front was covered by weakened troops of the 4 and Turkestan armies. Should the Cossacks of the Orenburg and Ural armies take Orenburg and Uralsk, or simply bypass the fortified cities, closing them with barriers, and the masses of the Cossack cavalry of Dutov, Tolstov and Belov (the South White group) would go to the Buzuluk area, to the rear of the Frunze shock group. As a result, the Frunze troops would have been in the ticks between the White Cossacks and the Khanzhin army. However, this did not happen. Whether Red Napoleon took Cossack psychology into account, the Cossacks fought hard against their “capitals”, they didn’t want to go any further. Toli just took a big risk and eventually won. The headquarters of Kolchak was never able to establish a good interaction with the Cossack units, they fought their war. Kolchak's command practically paid no attention to the Cossacks. As a result, about 30 thousand Cossacks were bogged down in the siege of Orenburg and Uralsk. And Frunze got his chance to win.

Meanwhile, due to the deterioration of the operational situation, the start time of the operation had to be postponed and a new regrouping of forces took place. At the site of the 2 Army, White broke through to Chistopol and reached the Volga. This posed a threat to Kazan. In the area of ​​the 5 Army, Kolchak troops were actively advancing in the Sergiev direction, opposing the 27 Division. This threatened the rail lines of the entire Southern Army Group, could disrupt the attack of the strike group. Therefore, the command of the front 16 of April threw in arriving reinforcements (part of the 2 th rifle division, part of the 35 th rifle division) not to strengthen the Frunze strike group in the Buzuluk area, but to reinforce the 5 th army and to cover the Volga frontally. Also, two brigades from the shock group of the 5 Army (1-rd infantry division, except for the 25-th rifle brigade) were transferred to the strengthening of the 73 Army.

Thus, the number of flank shock groups was significantly reduced. The center of gravity of the Reds blow was partially transferred from the flank and rear of the Western Army Khanzhin to the front. The 5-th Red Army on April 23 numbered 24 thousand bayonets and sabers (mainly due to the 1-th army). At the same time, the remaining troops of the strike fist of Frunze (31-rifle division, 73-rifle brigade, cavalry brigade) were named the Turkestan army.


Kolchak with generals Haida and Theological. 1919

Front of Kolchak's army in the central and southern sectors


By 20, April, 1919, a strong 2 Ufa Corps (4 and 8 Divisions, 15 thousand bayonets and sabers) launched an offensive on the Samara-Sergiev direction. The right flank of this group reached Chistopol. The White Corps 3 (6 Corps and 7 Corps Infantry Divisions, 3 Mounted Regiment, etc., about 5 Thousands of Fighters altogether) advanced in the direction of Buguruslan - Samara. On the ledge behind and to the south, having no connection with the 3 corps, the 6 Urals corps advanced, which had only 2400 soldiers (18 and 12 divisions).

In the area of ​​Belebey, Kappel's reserve corps was hastily concentrated (more than 5000 bayonets and sabers who did not manage to complete their formation and had to advance between the 3 and 6 corps. Further to the south and on the ledge in relation to the left flank of the Khanzhin army The right-flank 5 Corps of the Southern Army Group of Belov (6600 fighters) attacked. On the left flank of the 5 Corps, and backward there was a reserve 6 Corps (4600 soldiers). 1 and 2 of the Orenburg Corps (near 8500 soldiers) fought in the Orenburg direction, trying blows from the east and south, seize Orenburg and advance further to establish contact with the Ural Cossacks. Other units of the Orenburg army of Dutov and the Ural army of Tolstov also operated in the south.

Thus, the central section of the front of the whites was broken by ledges, the corps acted without military communication with each other. Especially in the center, where the 3 and 6 corps of the Kolchak troops were advancing. Such a grouping of enemy troops showed Frunze that first of all it was necessary to crush the Khanzhin's 3 th and 6 th corps closest to his strike group. 19 April Frunze designed the final plan of the operation: 1) Guy’s 1 Army had to launch a decisive offensive and forge the 6 Corps of the Whites, providing the Turkestan Army (Frunze strike group) from the right wing; 2) The Turkestan army, in cooperation with the reinforced 5 army, was to smash the 3 corps of the whites in the Buguruslan area, pushing the enemy northward, cutting off Belebey. The cavalry of the Turkestan army keeps in contact with the 1 army, smashes the rear of the 3 corps; 3) The 5-I Red Army goes over to a decisive offensive on the Buguruslan sector. In addition, the front command outlined an auxiliary strike in the Sergiev-Bugulma direction (forces of the 2 and 35 rifle divisions). In the northern sector of the 3-I army had to go on the offensive in the Perm direction no later than 29 April.



To be continued ...
43 comments
Information
Dear reader, to leave comments on the publication, you must sign in.
  1. +11
    2 May 2019 06: 02
    Thanks to the efforts of Frunze, the landing forces and tank troops, new artillery and automatic weapons appeared in the Red Army, and methods of conducting rear support for the troops were developed. Mikhail Vasilievich managed to stabilize the situation in the Red Army in a short time. The theoretical development of tactics and combat strategies in an imperialist war, laid down by Frunze, were fully implemented during the Second World War.
    1. 0
      2 May 2019 07: 10
      All this of course is so .. Of course in history they do not speak in a subjugal mood. But if Frunze had not died in the hospital or what happened there ... would he not have become the "second Budyonny", honoring on his laurels and not playing any positive role in the Great Patriotic War? education and experience quite successfully commanded the front ..
      1. -5
        2 May 2019 07: 41
        More than the strange death of Frunze. As the author of the article correctly noted, calling Frunze Napoleon- Red Napoleon became unnecessary and became, even dangerous for those holding power at that time.
        1. -2
          2 May 2019 09: 13
          Quote: Monster_Fat
          More than the strange death of Frunze. As the author of the article correctly noted, calling Frunze Napoleon- Red Napoleon became unnecessary and became, even dangerous for those holding power at that time.

          Rave. What did you want to say, heartfelt?
          Trotsky, is this power? Even some. It is dangerous for him.
          Stalin, is this power? Member of the PBC Southern Front. Question.
          Lenin, power? And is Frunze dangerous to him? feel
          1. -3
            2 May 2019 09: 38
            What did you want to say, heartfelt?

            To be rude, however, do not. You, at least, read the historical literature, which describes the "Soviet" spider (spiders in a bank) at a time when there was an irreconcilable struggle for power, and - merciless. Personally, I take Stalin's words quite seriously that "all means are good for the triumph of the proletariat, absolutely everything." Moreover, Trotsky said the same thing, with only one amendment - "the world proletariat." And this, oddly enough, said Lenin. What do you think was meant by "all means"? Moreover, curiously, all these figures considered themselves the only "smart" and did not accept someone else's perception of the situation, someone else's opinion. The same Lenin was rolling in hysterics when the Council of People's Commissars went against his opinion and demanded that it be immediately disbanded and its members shot.
            1. +7
              2 May 2019 09: 55
              Yes, and do not forget that the unspoken verdict of the "assistant to the whites" hung on Frunze after his "incomprehensible" ones (by the way, historians are still arguing about what it was, although personally I think it all just happened because of his exceptional decency as a person) of his actions towards the Wrangelites (maybe you are impressed by Zemlyachka in this regard?). And by the way, Frunze was, in general, an ambitious person who more than once openly said that if he ruled the country, he would not have thrown out valuable cadres abroad, but on the contrary, he would have given them broad fullness of power, since the so-called " the White Guards "still had a core -" serving the fatherland "," white bone "and" blue blood "should, in his opinion, serve the fatherland because of an innate love for Russia, but the so-called commissars and other" newly minted servants of the people " his opinion was aimed only at personal enrichment and usurpation of power. This is what most likely prompted those in power at that time to take advantage of the opportunity to remove Frunze. Once again, so that there is no misunderstanding, I inform you that in my opinion, Frunze was a real genius, the smartest, very decent person who was destroyed for the sake of competition for power. If it were not destroyed, much in Soviet history and in the history of Russia in general took a completely different path. IMHO of course.
            2. -8
              2 May 2019 10: 09
              [quote = Monster_Fat]
              [quote] What did you want to say something, heartfelt? [/ quote]
              [i] Be rude, but don't. You, at least, read the historical literature, which describes the "Soviet" spider (spiders in a bank) at a time when there was an irreconcilable struggle for power, and - merciless. Personally, I take Stalin's words quite seriously that "all means are good for the triumph of the proletariat, absolutely everything." Moreover, Trotsky said the same thing, with only one amendment - "the world proletariat." And this, oddly enough, said Lenin. What do you think was meant by "all means"?

              They spoke correctly and did the right thing.
              Do you even know what happened during the Great French Revolution? How were the "children of the revolution" put on the guillotine in bundles? Are you aware that most of our revolutionaries had "masters" - Germans, Americans, British, French? And naturally, they ordered the music.
              Moreover, curiously, all these figures considered themselves the only "smart" and did not accept someone else's perception of the situation, someone else's opinion. The same Lenin was rolling in hysterics when the Council of People's Commissars went against his opinion and demanded that it be immediately disbanded and its members shot.
              We thought correctly. The clever one wins, but .... he chews snot and does not want to understand the "current moment". The question was "to be or not to be" (And so to be or not to be Russia). Do you disagree? Would you stay in February with the Democrats?
              1. The comment was deleted.
              2. +5
                2 May 2019 10: 15
                The clever one wins, but .... he chews snot and does not want to understand the "current moment". The question was "to be or not to be" (And so to be or not to be Russia). Do you disagree? Would you stay in February with the Democrats?

                Yes-ah ... My friend, yes, you are simply enchanting ..... (the famous phrase of the boy from the movie "Seryozha" follows) ... As you can see for you, "democracy" is like a red rag for a bull. Is the Red Caballa better? Stalin's genius is that he was able to overcome this "cabal", but what if he could not? No offense.... hi
        2. -12
          2 May 2019 11: 38
          Quote: Monster_Fat
          More than the strange death of Frunze. As the author of the article correctly noted, calling Frunze Napoleon- Red Napoleon became unnecessary and became, even dangerous for those holding power at that time.

          Write openly, on the orders of Stalin, Frunze on the operating table and finished.
          1. +1
            2 May 2019 11: 41
            Stalin then did not have the "necessary" weight. However, no one cancels the "obliging lackeys", subtly feeling "trends, trends, beckons of power."
        3. +3
          3 May 2019 19: 49
          Quote: Monster_Fat
          More than the strange death of Frunze.

          There is nothing strange in this, given the state of medicine of those years.
          In the late XNUMXs, the head of the medical service, Major General General, died not on the operating table, but from the fact that during the procedures when he was injected, sepsis of soft tissues occurred and the best doctors of the group could not do anything about it, when the process became irreversible .
      2. -3
        2 May 2019 11: 34
        "Would he not have become a" second Budyonny "honoring on laurels and not playing any positive role in the Great Patriotic War?"
        He wouldn’t; he wouldn’t survive the 37. It was too noticeable.
      3. +7
        2 May 2019 13: 14
        Budyonny played a rather big role in the Great Patriotic War. I mean his perseverance in maintaining large cavalry formations, which paid off handsomely in the early years of the Second World War.
      4. +11
        2 May 2019 14: 01
        In Reality, Budyonny fought quite normally and the cavalry was not showing itself badly
        1. -1
          2 May 2019 15: 45
          Pure cavalry really showed itself near Moscow in the winter of 1941-42 and in the summer of 42 in the Kuban (the famous Kushchevskaya lava). The remaining battles are as infantry (dismounted before the battle) and as part of horse-mechanized groups of the same Pliev or Oslikovsky. Budyonny’s merits are a moot point. In the initial period of the war, our military commanders, the same Konev and Rokossovsky, were defeated. They were allowed to prove themselves in the future, but not Budyonny, the exiled can be said to inspect the cavalry.
    2. +10
      2 May 2019 09: 19
      What is the author that other fans of Caucasians for some reason always compare someone with Caucasians.
      MIKHAIL VASILIEVICH FRUNZE took place both as a politician and as a military leader INDEPENDENTLY.
      The takeoff of Napoleon’s career began with love affairs with powerful * ladies *, quite in the spirit of the French. His qualification as a military turned out to be insufficient for service in the RUSSIAN ARMY, but turned out to be a cut above that which was in the French troops.
      Comparison of Napoleon with successful military leaders is simply insulting. Napoleon for the sake of a career did not hesitate to buy positions or work out a career in bed, or outright robbery. From that he was so revered by both Hitler and the Nazis.
      The death of MIKHAIL VASILIEVICH FRUNZE was on the operating table, but for some reason the claims are not presented to doctors. For some reason, the current level of medicine is projected into the past and begin to lie. Mikhail Vasilievich Frunze and Joseph Vissarionovich Stalin more than impressed each other.
      1. +4
        2 May 2019 09: 28
        With what such "dominant" ladies did Napoleon have connections, after which he began to "take off"?
      2. 0
        2 May 2019 11: 40
        Quote: Vasily50
        What is the author that other fans of Caucasoids

        What kind of slang? Europioid is a person representing the Europioid race.
        Is Frunze a Mongoloid? laughing
      3. -2
        2 May 2019 13: 11
        Rusu
        Caucasians neither you nor anyone else living outside the extreme end of the mainland of Europe, especially those living in RUSSIA for full-fledged people do not consider. For them, and the Poles with other balts * Untermensch *.
        in RUSSIA, koi dream * to merge in the ecstasy of love * with Caucasians simply can not read what is printed there in the media, nor their fiction, nor scientific papers on biology or political science, of which many are published there claiming the superiority of Caucasians is mandatory.
        The British, even against the background of Caucasians, stand apart from the justification of their own superiority, however, like the Japanese.
        veil
        Do not rely on fragmentary information, you just need to read Napoleon’s biography. Even with the varnishing of those events, much climbs out for all to see. However, for the French, a career through bed is neither surprising nor shameful. A vivid example of this is Dantes who traded his ass and later, already in France, was also a rich and respected senator.
      4. +1
        2 May 2019 14: 04
        Why lie he was accepted into the Russian service but a rank lower than he had because such a decree came out. And evidence of Napoleon's purchase of titles and promotion through bed do you have?
    3. +5
      2 May 2019 17: 37
      Let me clarify how, through the efforts of Frunze, the landing troops appeared in the Red Army? Can you give a link?
      1. +1
        3 May 2019 19: 52
        Quote: Hist
        Let me clarify how, through the efforts of Frunze, the landing troops appeared in the Red Army?

        This author wrote slightly in the heat of the moment, as well as about tank troops, which then did not exist in the project, but there were separate groups of tanks.
  2. +7
    2 May 2019 09: 06
    It hurts to read the article ...... it really hurts, as if they saw a bone.
    After all, you know that the Russians fought on either side. Both sides were stupefied. This is what manipulation does - the worst sin - is the fornication of the mind.
    I can’t, information is not perceived.
    In Russian history, I can name two generals from birth - these are Suvorov and Frunze. There was essentially nothing and no one to teach both of them - they themselves reached everything. It's like Mozart - wrote the first symphony at 4 years old.
    I will not read the sequel - it's just hard, my imagination is too rich.
    1. 0
      2 May 2019 12: 42
      Quote: lucul
      It hurts to read the article ...... it really hurts, as if they saw a bone

      it’s not painful to cut the bone, there are no nerve endings, only it doesn’t smell very good. and so, yes, I agree. in my family were on the one and on the other hand ...
    2. +2
      3 May 2019 18: 30
      Well, not only Russians fought on either side. And the war was civilian, not interethnic. Discussions on the topic of who fooled whom and what - so you can talk about everything. The monarchy was - the king fooled his head, the communists - the communists, the democrats - the democrats. With this approach, you only have to shoot yourself from the red revolutionary levolvert - there is no truth, truth, or reference point for you in life laughing
  3. +17
    2 May 2019 10: 10


    The name of Comrade Frunze was imprinted in gold in the history of our army.
    1. +4
      2 May 2019 10: 45
      The name of Comrade Frunze was imprinted in gold in the history of our army.

      Sumptuously! Just nothing to add! hi
  4. +13
    2 May 2019 11: 00
    Our ancestors got rid of the shackles of imperial slavery, returned freedom to the people, and today the new invaders have again enslaved the people. And again, new Lenin, Stalin, Frunze, Dzerzhinsky, Beria are needed. For a new confrontation is inevitable. Or death.
    1. 0
      2 May 2019 11: 41
      Quote: erased
      Our ancestors got rid of the shackles of imperial slavery, returned freedom to the people, and today the new invaders have again enslaved the people. And again, new Lenin, Stalin, Frunze, Dzerzhinsky, Beria are needed. For a new confrontation is inevitable. Or death.

      And Yezhov and Berry?
      1. +5
        2 May 2019 12: 20
        Only fools repeat their mistakes. Do not worry. Bulkohrust.-punishment will strictly correspond to guilt.
        1. -12
          2 May 2019 14: 53
          Quote: Seeker
          Only fools repeat their mistakes. Do not worry. Bulkohrust.-punishment will strictly correspond to guilt.

          Now everyone wants Stalin for someone, but not for themselves, thinking that they will not fall under the "rink", naive cheers-patriots.

          "Come on, Bolshevik, tell me who you are ready to kill for your atomic bomb, the Dnieper hydroelectric dam and what else do you have there. Are you ready to kill your mom? Neighbors, classmates? Me? Well, it's not difficult, but yourself - here you are personally ready freeze into the Kolyma soil for the sake of someone explaining to your great-grandchildren in a hundred years that you are frozen into this soil for a reason, but because the country needs tin? "
      2. +7
        2 May 2019 17: 04
        And then the enemies pretending to be their own. Like Tukhachevsky, Egorov, Blucher. Read documentary research by Prudnikova. Zhukov, Kremlin, Pykhalov, Isaev. Everything is painted there literally by day. With the reduction of archival data.
        By the way, now there are perhaps even more internal enemies, but they have power in their power. The time will come, they will be responsible for everything.
        1. -7
          2 May 2019 17: 35
          First, you will read the works of N.S. Cherusheva, O.F. Suvenirova, A.A. Pechenkina, N. Shilo and A. Glushko. It examines in detail, using archival documents, how evidence of the guilt of the above-named commanders was fabricated. And Prudnikova and other "researchers" use speculation and rumors.
      3. The comment was deleted.
  5. -12
    2 May 2019 17: 25
    How many millions did this "red Napoleon" kill Russian people? ... Red from the blood of compatriots ...
  6. +2
    2 May 2019 18: 01
    An interesting fact about the defense of Orenburg - I did not know that its fortifications were made according to the plan of Karbyshev. Respect to the author. One thing is depressing - the presence of typos.
    [quote] the red commander Frunze was able to avoid defeat, took back the retreating forces in time, regrouped his forces, strengthened his left wing (avoiding the threat of the Reds breaking into the rear of the Southern Group), and created a reserve. [/ quote]
    Probably, the breakthrough is not red, but white.
  7. +8
    2 May 2019 23: 18
    To the minus author.
    First, it is incorrect to name M.V. Frunze "Red Napoleon". Frunze fought for the cause of the working class, and Napoleon for the bourgeoisie.
    Secondly, the author again applied the definition to Kolchak's army that it is "Russian".

    According to Samsonov it turns out that "Russian »army of Kolchak fought with "Non-Russian" Red Army. This is unforgivable to the real historian, by this he plays along with the forces that are trying to oppose the Red Army and Russia today, imposing the myth that the Red Army is a bunch of Chinese and Latvians led by the Bolsheviks. But this is bad luck: Kolchak’s “Russian” army was kept by the interventionists, and the “non-Russian” Red Army threw these interventionists out of the country.

    It’s time for the author to learn that a civil war is a class war. On the one hand, the workers and labor peasants who knew what they were fighting were fighting for the interests of the exploited, on the other hand, they were fighting for the interests of the exploiters in order to regain the power of the landlords and the bourgeoisie, the workers and peasants too, only deceived or mobilized, because the manufacturers, bankers and landowners themselves did not fight. They knew why only the wealthy (fists and Cossacks) were fighting on their side. They fought not to share their lands with the poor and have the right to exploit them by hiring laborers.
  8. 0
    3 May 2019 11: 49
    The war swept through my ancestral village, located in the strip of Bashkir and Orenburg Cossack troops. The village, consisting of immigrants from the Tambov region, was apparently in many years of opposition to the Cossacks. According to the legend of the family, my relative, the red cavalry commander with a magnificent mustache, alienated; refused the Order of the Red Banner in favor of a leather jacket, for which his wife was very saddened all her life because lost some benefits.
  9. 0
    3 May 2019 12: 28
    As Napoleon achieved success in his first campaign, relying on the support of Italians (since he himself was Italian), so Frunze hit the White Guards through areas hostile to the Cossacks. He probably knew very well that the Ural Cossacks would not go to peasant lands, much less go to the Bashkirs.
    1. +2
      3 May 2019 19: 56
      Quote: geologist
      How Napoleon achieved success in his first campaign, relying on the support of Italians (as he himself was Italian)

      In fact, he was a Corsican, and they never considered themselves Italians - do not offend the emperor.
      1. 0
        5 May 2019 06: 49
        Bonaparte spoke an French accent with an Italian accent. Tsar Alexander ironically remarked that he speaks the language of the enemy better than their commander. Naturally, in the Italian company Napoleon easily attracted the local population to his side because knew their mentality (hatred of the Austrians) and was a native speaker.
  10. The comment was deleted.
  11. 0
    6 May 2019 12: 35
    And what place is Napoleon? Say he developed something like Napoleon’s code? Or became an emperor? Select expression!
  12. 0
    8 May 2019 20: 35
    My countryman. He was in a museum named after him in Frunze. He looked at the coat in which he was born and grew. It has long been. BUT IT WAS.
  13. 0
    26 May 2019 07: 04
    Frunze-- in general, the mystery of the revolution .... and his death too ...., too significant figure, successful and very talented in all areas.