"All to fight with Kolchak!"

44
Smoot. 1919 year. 100 years ago, at the end of April 1919, the counter-offensive of the Eastern Front of the Red Army began. The Reds halted the offensive of the Russian army of Kolchak, defeated the whites in the central and southern sectors of the front and created the conditions for crossing the Ural range.

General situation at the front


In early March, the 1919 of the year, anticipating the Reds, who were also preparing for an offensive, the white armies of Kolchak launched Flight to the Volga, a strategic operation aimed at defeating the Red Eastern Front, access to the Volga, connecting with the White Northern Front and further march on Moscow ("How did the" Flight to the Volga "; "How Kolchak's army broke through to the Volga").



Initially, Kolchak’s strategy repeated the plans of his predecessors, the White Czechs and the Directory. They planned to deliver the main blow in the northern operational direction, Perm - Vyatka - Vologda. A strike in this direction, with success, led to a connection with the troops of the Whites and the interventionists on the Northern Front. Then it was possible to organize a campaign against Petrograd, having received help from Finland and the Northern Corps in this strategic operation (since the summer of the 1919, the North-Western Army). The northern direction as a whole was a dead end, since the western interventionists were not really going to fight in Russia, acting with the hands of whites and nationalists, there were few communications here, the territories are poorly developed economically, there is little population.

At the same time, the white command delivered a strong blow to the line of the middle Volga, approximately at the front of Kazan, Simbirsk. This direction was more important, as it allowed to force the Volga, leading the whites to rich in material resources and densely populated gubernias. Kolchak's army brought together with the White South Front. The White Eastern Front struck out in three armies: The Siberian army, under the command of General Gaida, attacked the Permian-Vyatka sector; The Western army of General Khanzhin struck at Ufa (the Southern Army group was allocated on its southern flank); The Orenburg and Ural armies advanced on Orenburg and Uralsk. Kappel's case was in reserve. Thus, the main forces of the Russian army of Kolchak (93 thousand people from 113 thousand) were advancing in the Vyatka, Sarapul and Ufa directions.

The forces of whites and reds at the beginning of the battle were about equal. The troops of the Red Eastern Front numbered 111 thousand people, had the advantage in firepower (guns, machine guns). During the first stage of the operation, White was helped by the fact that in the central, Ufa direction there was a weak 10-thousandth 5-I Red Army. Against her, there was a strong 49-thousandth white Hanzhin group. In the north (the 2 and 3 Red armies) forces were approximately equal, in the south the Red forces had a strong army group (4, Turkestan and 1 armies).

The moment for the strategic offensive of Kolchak's army was favorable. The military coup that brought Kolchak to power temporarily strengthened the internal unity of the whites. Internal contradictions at the time were smoothed out. Kolchak mobilized in Siberia, supplies were restored, the army was at the peak of its combat capability. The Russian army Kolchak provided material assistance to the United States, Britain, France and Japan. The Soviet command transferred part of the forces of the Eastern Front to the Southern, where the situation was extremely tense. The policy of "war communism", especially the food distribution, caused the growth of peasant uprisings in the rear of the Reds. In the near rear of the Eastern Front of the Red Army a wave of uprisings swept through Simbirsk and Kazan provinces.

"All to fight with Kolchak!"


The breakthrough of the army of Kolchak to the Volga


White's offensive began on 4 March 1919 of the year. The Siberian army of Gaydy struck in the area between the cities of Osa and Okhansk. The Whites forced the Kama across the ice, took both cities and developed the offensive. Guyda’s army was able to advance to 90 - 100 km in a week, but it was not possible to break through the front of the Reds. White's further advance was slowed down by the enormous space of the theater, the lack of roads and the resistance of the Reds. While retreating, the 2-I and 3-I red armies retained the integrity of the front and combat capability, although they suffered casualties and great material damage. After the defeat in the Perm region, the Reds carried out work on mistakes (the Stalin-Dzerzhinsky commission), quantitatively and qualitatively strengthened the direction, increased the combat capability of the troops.

Whites occupied a large region, 7 of April was again established in Izhevsk-Votkinsky district, 9 of April captured Sarapul and 15 of April their forward units in the wild Pechora region came into contact with groups of the white Northern front. However, this event, as previously noted, had no strategic significance. In the second half of April, 1919, the Siberian army of Gaida did not have great success, and the resistance of the 3 th Red Army increased. However, on the left flank, White pressed the Reds and threw the right flank of the 2 Red Army over the lower course of the river. Vyatka.

In the central direction Kolchak's army achieved greater success. The strike group of Khanzhin’s Western Army (it was one of Kolchak’s best commanders) found the enemy’s weak spot and attacked the 5 and 2 armies in the free space between the inner flanks. The left-flank brigade of the 5 Army (from the 27 Division) was defeated, the whites moved along the Birsk-Ufa highway to the rear of both divisions of the Red Army (26 and 27). During the 4-day battles, the 5 Army was defeated, its remnants retreated in the Menzeline and Bugulma areas. March 13 whites took Ufa, captured large trophies.

The introduction of private reserves into the battle and the Reds' attempt to organize a counterstrike on the left flank of the 1 Army in the Sterlitamak area did not lead to success. True, the remnants of the 5 th Red Army managed to avoid encirclement and total annihilation. The Reds retreated to Simbirsk and Samara. White continued the breakthrough. April 5 Kolchakians took Sterlitamak and Menzelinsk, April 6 - Belebey, April 13 - Bugulma, April 15 - Buguruslan. April 21 whites came to Kama in the area of ​​today's Naberezhnye Chelny, created a threat to Chistopol. April 25 took Chistopol, creating a threat of a breakthrough to Kazan. In the south, the armies of the Orenburg and Ural Cossacks took Orsk, Lbishchensk, laid siege to Uralsk, and approached Orenburg.

Thus, the strike of Khanzhin's army led to a strategic breakthrough of the central sector of the Red Eastern Front. However, this event did not lead to the collapse of the entire Eastern Front of the Red Army, which could lead to the catastrophe of the Southern Red Front. This was due to the scale of the theater, no matter how deep the breakthrough of Kolchak was, it did not affect the situation in the northern and southern directions of the Eastern Front. This made it possible for the supreme Soviet command to undertake a series of retaliatory measures for the transfer of reserves, new units to the threatened direction, and to prepare a powerful counterattack. In addition, the white command simply did not have second-tier troops and strategic reserves to build on the success of the Ufa-Samara and Kazan directions. From other directions, White could not transfer forces. The Siberian army of Gayda was distracted in the unpromising direction of Vyatka, and in the south the Cossack divisions were bogged down in Orenburg and Uralsk.

As a result, at the end of April 1919, the Russian Army of Kolchak broke through the front of the Eastern Red Front, captured vast territories with a population of more than 5 million. The White Eastern Front established contact with the Northern Front. Kolchak's deputies reached distant approaches to Kazan, Samara and Simbirsk, and besieged Orenburg and Uralsk.


A. V. Kolchak. Picture taken 1 May 1919, when the general attack of his armies choked. Source: https://ru.wikipedia.org


On the reasons for the failure of the further advance of Kolchak's armies


The enormous scope of the strategic operation and the determination of the goals of the Kolchak army ruled out the possibility of achieving victory in one stage by the available forces. That is, after the exhaustion of the forces of the shock groups of the Siberian and Western armies, new mobilizations were required. And they were at the expense of the Siberian peasantry. However, the policy of the Kolchak government precluded the possibility of finding a common language with the Russian peasantry. As already noted in a series of articles on the Troubles and the Civil War in Russia, the peasants, since the February Revolution and the authorities of the Provisional Government, waged their war. The struggle against any government in general, not wanting to pay taxes, go to war in the army of whites or reds, fulfill labor duties, etc. The peasant war against any government has become one of the brightest and bloody pages of the Russian Troubles. It is clear that the peasants did not intend to support the regime of Kolchak, who led the policy of enslaving them.

Therefore, new mobilization of peasants for the army only strengthened the resistance of the peasantry, worsened the position of Kolchak's army. The movement of the red partisans spread in the rear, the peasants raised one rebellion after the others, the tough repressive policies of the Kolchak government could not rectify the situation. Suppress a riot in one place, a fire breaks out in another. At the front, new recruits only decomposed the troops. It is not surprising that when the Reds launched a counterattack, many white units began to completely go over to the side of the Red Army.

That is, whites did not have a serious social base in the east of the country. The peasantry opposed the Kolchak regime, became the mainstay of the red partisans. The townspeople were generally neutral. The workers were split. Izhevtsy and Votkinsk fought for the whites, others supported the Reds. The Cossacks were small, rather weak (relative to the Don, Kuban, and Terek Cossacks), and disunited. Amur and Ussuri Cossack troops bogged down in the internal war of Primorye. The leader there was the ataman Kalmykov, an outspoken thug who ignored Kolchak's government and was oriented toward Japan. His people were more involved in looting, murder, and violence than fighting the Reds. The larger army of Zabaikalsky was subordinate to ataman Semyonov, who also did not recognize the power of Kolchak and looked at Japan. It was beneficial for the Japanese to support the Ataman “governments” of Kalmykov and Semenov, they hoped to create puppet state formations in the Far East and Eastern Siberia completely dependent on the Japanese Empire on the basis of them. In this muddy water, the Japanese quietly robbed the wealth of Russia. At the same time, the power of the atamans was frankly gangster; Semyonov, even against the backdrop of the horrors of the Troubles, was distinguished by the craziest antics, the most brutal murders and terror. Atamans and their henchmen slaughtered, hung, tortured, raped and robbed all who could not offer strong resistance, created "initial capital" to live comfortably abroad. In addition, some of the Cossacks recoiled from such outspoken gangsters, created red squads and fought against Semyonov.

More or less, Kolchak's regime was supported by the Siberian Cossacks. Semirechye Cossacks fought their war, on the outskirts of the empire. The Orenburg Cossacks were quite powerful. True, there were red Cossacks. Cossacks submitting to Dutov became part of Kolchak's Russian army. The Orenburg army led an offensive in the southern direction. However, the Orenburg Cossacks as a whole fought on their own, their connection with them was weak. The situation was similar with the Ural Cossacks.

Also, Kolchak's army did not have a serious qualitative advantage over the Red Army, unlike Denikin’s Armed Forces of the South of Russia. The main part of the officership during the collapse of the country and the beginning of unrest rushed to the south of the country. In addition, since the uprising of the Czechoslovak Corps, getting to the south from the center of Russia was much easier than to Siberia through the front. Many then went over to the side of the Reds or, until the last, tried to maintain neutrality, tired of the war. But having a base allowed Alekseev, Kornilov and Denikin to create a powerful personnel core of the army. Get the "nominal" selected officer parts - Markov, Drozdov, Kornilov, Alekseev, welded by traditions, victories and defeats. Kolchak had practically no such parts. The people of Izhevsk and the workers of Votkinsk from the rebel workers themselves became strong and combat-ready units. In the east, frames were most often random or mobilized. Of the 17 thousand officers, only about 1 thousand were personnel officers. The rest, at best, are storekeepers, warrant warrant officers, and at worst, “officers” produced by various foundations, directories and regional governments. The acute shortage of personnel forced the officers to produce as officers after six-week courses.


Agitational poster of the Siberian Army Kolchak


The situation was similar with the military leaders. In the south of Russia, a whole galaxy of famous commanders, many of whom distinguished themselves during the world war, came to the fore. Prominent commanders were so many that they did not have enough troops. They had to be held in civilian positions and in reserve. In the south, there was a shortage of experienced, competent, and talented personnel. This led to the weakness of the White Front headquarters, a shortage of experienced commanders at army, corps and divisional levels. It was full of all sorts of adventurers, careerists, people who want to fill their pockets in the surrounding chaos. Kolchak himself admitted: “... we are poor in people, why we have to endure even in high posts, not excluding ministers, people far from appropriate for the places they occupy, but this is because there is no one to replace them ...”

In this position, the white command could count on the success of one powerful strike. It was necessary to choose one operational direction, on the other to confine to auxiliary operations. It was advisable to strike the main blow south of Ufa, in order to join forces with the Southern White Front. However, apparently, the government of Kolchak was bound by obligations to the Entente. As a result, the White Army inflicted two heavy blows on Vyatka, in the region of the Middle Volga. This led to the dispersal of White’s limited forces and assets.

It is not surprising that already against the background of victories, problems quickly began to accumulate. A separate Orenburg army Dutov approached Orenburg and got bogged down under it. Cossack cavalry was unsuitable for the siege and the assault of fortified positions. And the Cossacks did not want to go around Orenburg, to go into a deep breakthrough, they wanted to first liberate "their" land. The Ural Cossacks were bound by the siege of Uralsk. The Orenburg sector was automatically attached to Khanzhin’s Western Army. The southern army group Belova was pulled to cover the front gap between the Western army and the Orenburg and Ural armies. As a result, the whites lost their advantage in cavalry. Instead of entering the breach created by Khanzhin’s powerful offensive, smashing the reds of the Reds, their separate units, intercepting communications, all the cavalry forces of the White Army were tied for Orenburg and Uralsk.

Meanwhile, the Khanzhin corps were moving farther and farther apart from each other across the vast expanses of Russia, losing a weak link between them. White command could still strengthen the Western army at the expense of the Siberian. However, this possibility Kolchak headquarters did not use. And the red ones did not sleep. Pull up reserves, new parts, mobilized the Communists, strengthening the personnel of the Eastern Front.

In addition, in the middle of April 1919, the spring thaw began, flooding the rivers. The dash on Samara was drowned in mud. Gadgets and artillery far behind the advanced units. White troops were cut off from their bases; they could not replenish their reserves at the decisive moment. weapons, ammunition, ammunition, provisions. The movement of troops stopped. Red troops were in the same position, but for them it was a useful pause in the fighting. They were at their bases, could replenish troops, stocks, rest and regroup.


Poster "Forward, to the defense of the Urals!" 1919



V.I. Lenin gives a speech in front of the General Education Regiments in Red Square. Moscow, 25 May 1919


To be continued ...
Our news channels

Subscribe and stay up to date with the latest news and the most important events of the day.

44 comments
Information
Dear reader, to leave comments on the publication, you must sign in.
  1. +7
    April 30 2019 05: 26
    One of the qualities with which the enemies of the communists seriously imagined that they are more than the communists and their supporters worthy and capable of owning the country is their fantastic COWARDENESS, a complete lack of a sense of responsibility for their words and deeds. So, after the October Revolution, they immediately created armed armies with the aim of overthrowing the power of the Bolsheviks, seizing the territories of Soviet Russia / RSFSR, killing the Bolsheviks and their supporters, BUT they still whine in a cowardly chorus "but we have nothing to do with it, the Bolsheviks unleashed the Civil War."
    1. +10
      April 30 2019 05: 36
      Troubles. 1919 year. 100 years ago, at the end of April 1919, the counterattack of the Eastern Front of the Red Army began. The Reds stopped the offensive of the Russian army of Kolchak
      - from article

      To the author, but that the Red Army was not Russian?
      1919 - the height of the Russian civil war between the Russians, the Red Army and Bela, and historically it is not true to single out one of them as Russian.
      From the first lines the article is biased, and therefore not objective.
      On the side of the Red Army by 1919, the majority of the people of Russia came forward. On the side of Belaya are representatives of the overthrown exploiting classes, trying to return the people to a position humiliated by slavery. This is the essence of the Civil War in Russia at the beginning of the last century.
      1. +10
        April 30 2019 06: 21
        "All to fight with Kolchak!"
        got it .... kolchaks, denikins, yudenichs now almost national heroes ... there are avenues and squares to name ...
        1. +4
          April 30 2019 06: 29
          Well, this is a primitive tactic of the enemies of the Communists to justify their capture of the USSR. Unlike the Bolshevik Communists and their supporters, they have nothing of their own, they are not able to GIVE anything to their country and people, only to take away, therefore, to justify the capture of the USSR, they slandered those from whom they took the country, and automatically praise and they justify the crimes of those against whom the Bolshevik Communists were, and those who were against them.
          1. -3
            April 30 2019 18: 51
            Quote: tatra
            therefore, to justify their capture of the USSR

            So this is not under the leadership of the Communist Party of the USSR sold for jeans?
            1. 0
              April 30 2019 18: 58
              Stupid question . You, the enemies of the Communists, who categorically do not want to take responsibility for the country that you took away from the Communists and their supporters, de facto, captured the USSR back in 1985, when one of you, Gorbachev, with the help of your eternal lies and hypocrisy, seized power, gave all of you freedom of speech and action, and already in the late 80s you began to plant your "priorities" - total slander on the history of your country, justification of the invaders of your country, invaders and Nazis, naked "boobs-pussy", parasitism ...
              1. -1
                April 30 2019 19: 11
                Quote: tatra
                Stupid question . You enemies of the communists

                So which party was in power?
                1. 0
                  April 30 2019 19: 20
                  Which one? If one of you, the fierce enemies of the communists, Gorbachev, in the late 80s launched a total slander of the communists, praising the enemies of the communists, justifying their crimes, and the other, Yeltsin, for whom you tore your throats, rushed under the tanks, ran to the White House to defend it with "breasts", in August 1991 suspended the operation of the CPSU, and on November 6 banned the CPSU? ...
                  1. -2
                    April 30 2019 19: 56
                    Quote: tatra
                    in August 1991 of the year

                    When was the USSR actually only on paper? That is, before that there was still the Communist Party.
                    1. -2
                      April 30 2019 19: 59
                      It can’t be that everything that I wrote about happens under the power of the Communists ... And you perfectly understand that, only you are lying and hypocrites. And don't write me anymore.
                      1. -1
                        April 30 2019 21: 19
                        Quote: tatra
                        so that everything I wrote about would happen under communist rule

                        And then whose? Martian?
      2. -10
        April 30 2019 07: 41
        Quote: vladimirZ
        To the author, but that the Red Army was not Russian?

        One of the outstanding creators of the Red Army was Leyba Davidovich Bronstein, what kind of Russian army will be here.
        1. +2
          April 30 2019 18: 46
          Well, of course. And he alone and his fellow tribesmen in the Red Army fought.
        2. +1
          April 30 2019 19: 00
          Well, yes, Nicholas II was a German-Dane, what a Russian army could have been with him. And the leaders of the White Guards have such "Russian" names.
      3. +4
        April 30 2019 12: 01
        Absolutely correct. After defining "Kolchak's Russian army", one cannot count on objectivity.
      4. -5
        April 30 2019 13: 55
        Quote: vladimirZ
        Was the Red Army not Russian?
        1919 - the height of the Russian civil war between Russians

        No, the Red Army was not Russian, but the Workers 'and Peasants' (Latvian workers 'and Hungarian peasants', "joke") The Civil War was mainly fought between Russians and Soviet (erroneously called "white" and "red"), between Russia and the Soviet Republic It was not for nothing that immediately after the defeat of Russia (in November 1922 the last Russian units left Vladivostok), the Soviets in December 1922 announced the creation of the Union of Soviet Socialist Republics. Admiral A. Kolchak held the post of Supreme Commander-in-Chief Russian Army, which included the Eastern, Northern and North-Western Fronts and the All-Union Specialist League of Liberation General A.I. Denikin.
        1. +3
          April 30 2019 15: 25
          The civil war was mainly fought between Russians and Soviet (erroneously called "whites" and "reds"), between Russia and the Soviet Republic.
          - rusin

          Don't write nonsense if you don't know the history of Russia-USSR! Only an ardent Russophobe can write this - "in November 1922 the last Russian units left Vladivostok." Did you accidentally make a mistake with the site?

          "Soviet Republic", if you don't know, was called Russian Soviet Federative Socialist Republic - RSFSR, i.e. Soviet Russia, which later in 1922 together with the Soviet Ukraine, Belarus and Transcaucasia united in the USSR.
          Moreover, Soviet Russia - the RSFSR did not disappear anywhere, it was the leading one in the Soviet Union.
          1. -5
            April 30 2019 15: 31
            Quote: vladimirZ
            RSFSR, i.e. Soviet Russia

            There is some difference between the words "Russia" and "RSFSR". Why did the Soviets disguise their country like that? That Kolchak never hid that he - Supreme Ruler of Russia ! Under the authority of the Russian state, residents had the citizenship of Russia, and in the country of Ulyanov-Bronstein, from December 1922, they were citizens of the USSR. Trust Soviet documents!
            1. +1
              April 30 2019 16: 43
              There is a certain difference between the words "Russia" and "RSFSR". ...
              Here Kolchak never hid that he is the Supreme Ruler of Russia!
              - rusin

              This is a difference for you Russophobia, especially never lived in the RSFSR.
              For us Russians, the Russian Soviet Federative Soviet Republic is our homeland, where about 80% of Russians who have provided their state-forming position for all the small peoples of Russia have equal rights to live in it. We did not have differences in relations between people by ethnicity, studied at schools, institutes, at work and no one divided anyone by ethnicity, all were by and large Russian, and considered themselves Russian by Russian nationality, and then by the nation of their small homeland .

              As for Kolchak, this -
              - "The uniform is English,
              Shoulder strap french
              Japanese tobacco,
              Ruler of Omsk ",
              having taken the oath of oath to the English crown after the tsar’s oath, he was, to your ignorance, a protege of foreign states trying to divide Russia.
              Moreover, for Siberia, in which Kolchak was a "ruler", he showed himself to be the oppressor and executioner of the people, who sent his punishers to cities and villages, as a result of which a widespread uprising against Kolchak's troops broke out throughout Siberia.
              The rebellious people in the rear of Kolchak liberated cities and villages, districts and provinces from Kolchak's troops, as a result of which this executioner could not even escape with his patrons. In Irkutsk, White Czechs with French representatives, in order to pass through the city liberated by the people, were forced to hand over this "Supreme Ruler" into the hands of the insurgent people as a ransom commodity.
              In Irkutsk, Kolchak was tried for all the atrocities that he committed against the Russian people, sentencing him to death.
              In Siberia, for a long time, even in the 70s and 80s, dogs were given the nickname "Kolchak", his name was so disgusting to the Russian people.
              1. -5
                April 30 2019 17: 28
                you are strange people ... Speak
                Quote: vladimirZ
                Russian Soviet Federative Soviet Republic - our Motherland
                and the USSR had citizenship. You declare that the Russians and mortally hate the Commander-in-Chief of the Russian Army A. Kolchak, who fought for Russia. Nobody judged Alexander Vasilyevich, he was killed by the Soviet on the orders of V. Ulyanov along with V. N. Pepelyaev, like hundreds of thousands Russian people.
                Quote: vladimirZ
                throughout Siberia, a widespread rebellion broke out against the troops of Kolchak.
                The rebellious people in the rear of Kolchak liberated the city and village, districts and provinces from Kolchak’s troops

                Throughout Siberia in 1921-22 uprisings broke out against the Red Army, the rebel people in the rear of the RSFSR liberated cities and villages, districts and provinces from the Soviet troops. https://topwar.ru/135246-zapadno-sibirskoe-vosstanie-za-sovety-bez-kommunistov.html By the way, the Red Army fought on American tanks in 1941-45, flew on British planes, traveled on Studebaker and Willis, chewed American stew and much more. https: //www.noo-journal.ru/encyclopedia/1943/land-liz/
                1. 0
                  1 May 2019 01: 21
                  Throughout Siberia in 1921-22, rebellions broke out against the Red Army ...
                  A. Kolchak, who fought for Russia. ...

                  By the way, the Red Army in 1941-45 fought on American tanks, flew on British planes, went to Studebaker and Willis, chewed American stew and much more.
                  - rusin

                  Do not write nonsense for Siberia, which you do not know, and in which, most likely, did not live!
                  Kolchak did not fight for the interests of the people of Russia, he fought against the people, for the interests of the Russian bourgeoisie and foreign capital, who tried to colonize Russia.
                  No order to V.I. Lenin "for the murder" Kolchak was not, do not show your illiteracy and ignorance.
                  In those days, power in Irkutsk was transferred from the Socialist-Revolutionary-Menshevik "Political Center", to whom Kolchak was handed over by the White Czechs / Frenchmen, to the Bolshevik Irkutsk Military Revolutionary Committee, remnants of Kolchak's troops, decided to shoot Kolchak together with his chairman of the "government" Pepeliaev.

                  As for the fact that "the Red Army fought on American tanks, flew on British planes, went on the Studebakers and Wilis, chewed on American stew", such individual facts took place, BUT it should be noted that the supply of this equipment and food basically began from the second half of 1943, when the Red Army already independently broke the back of Nazi Germany and all its allies and the war rolled to the West.
                  Moreover, for tanks and self-propelled guns - the USSR independently produced more than 105,2 thousand units during the war years, and only 18,5 thousand units were supplied by the "allies". (16,3%), for aircraft - the USSR produced more than 157,2 thousand units, the "allies" supplied - 18,4 thousand units. (11,7%). With regard to cars, the USA helped us well, you can't say anything about it, having delivered more than 427 thousand units, against those produced in the USSR - 265,6 thousand units. (163%).
                  As for the "American stew" and other food, it was aid, especially for canned meat, 480% of our production, but the determining factor for food in general was the production of food in the USSR, without it, no "American stew" would have saved us.
                  Yes, and the "help" itself was not free, the USSR paid for it in gold, both in the war and after the war, as well as with the blood and lives of its soldiers on the battlefields, fighting alone until July 1944 on the European continent against the whole of Europe in led by fascist Germany. The "Allies" entered the war on the continent with ground forces only when they felt they could be late for sharing the victory pie in Germany.
      5. 0
        26 July 2019 07: 02
        To the author, but that the Red Army was not Russian?


        The author did not put quotation marks, "Kolchak's Russian army", this is not a nationality, this is a conventional name for some military forces.
    2. +9
      April 30 2019 07: 25
      Kolchak, hackneyed topic on VO! De facto, he is of course the Arctic explorer and shaper of the squadron to march on Turkey, but he is also the leader of the White Terror in Siberia. De jure, he is a war criminal by the verdict of the tribunal, which has not been rehabilitated today, which means that it should be considered today. The figure is essentially tragic both for itself and for Russia!
  2. +10
    April 30 2019 05: 45
    The author very freely interprets what really happened at that time. Even more puzzling is the name of the Kolchak troops * RUSSIAN * and the explanation of the failures as an orthodox democratic liberal, the author did not forget to mention the surplus appraisal and about * peasant uprisings * in the rear of the RED ARMY.
    For amateurs - the surplus appraisal did NOT provide for the seizure of bread, but the purchase of bread at FIRM PRICES. And before that they endowed the peasants with land for * eaters *. It was in the RUSSIAN EMPIRE that they seized both bread and cattle due to arrears of redemption payments.
    Kolchak managed to take the oath to the king and the temporary and the British and the Americans.
    In the rear of the RED ARMY, all sorts of different dads raised uprisings that began with the murders of teachers of the teachers along with their families and, of course, robbed * the former *. Often robbed the church along the way knocking out of the priests hidden. The most significant in this regard is the Antonov rebellion. When the Socialist-Revolutionaries appointed their accomplice as the chief of police, and he managed to put together gangs from deserters and all kinds of different priests-monks and others who had lost the opportunity to eat softly at the expense of privileges, but who knew how to rob and destroy any dissent.
    Such a * dad * is very artistically shown in the film "The Adjutant of His Excellency." How popular and peasant this very * dad angel * was, everyone judges for himself.
  3. +2
    April 30 2019 07: 36
    Is history repeating or not?
    Do people change or not?
    It is useful to read, in order to understand some aspects of what is happening, but not all and not always.
  4. +9
    April 30 2019 08: 11
    Quote: Aerodrome
    got it .... kolchaks, denikins, yudenichs now almost national heroes ... there are avenues and squares to name ...

    Yes easily. Under the current regime, after laying SAMIM, flowers at the graves of Denikin, Solzhenitsin and Ilyin, the words about what the USSR did were only galoshes (the question is: where did you buy the spacecraft, Gagarin flew to KT, who exchanged the atomic icebreaker for galoshes and built a nuclear power plant) the idea of ​​the name of the avenues is not fantastic. Atamans of seeds, Kalmyks, Anniks, etc. will be just a little more heroes. They will find excuses for their crimes. Type fought for Mother Russia, for the crunch of French rolls and did not want to lose Russia. (well, the very one that they lost) In Moscow, they erected a monument to the chieftains and officers of the White Army, Krasnov, skin, Domanov, Zbrovsky, Skorodumov, Sultan Kelech-Girey, Turkul, Shteifon. Address: Moscow, Leningradsky Prospekt d.75 territory of the Church of All Saints.
    1. -8
      April 30 2019 08: 18
      Quote: Fevralsk. Morev
      after laying SAMIM, flowers at the graves of Denikin, Solzhenitsyn and Ilina

      Comrades, I got to Ilyin, his name excites their mind, in counter recorded the great Russian philosopher.
      1. +8
        April 30 2019 12: 27
        Quote: bober1982
        Comrades, I got to Ilyin

        ---------------------------
        Ilyin is an ideologist of Russian fascism, a solidarist.
        From I. Ilyin's article "National Socialism. New Spirit", 1933:

        “Europe does not understand the National Socialist movement. He does not understand and is afraid ... For us, who are in the very cauldron of events, seeing everything with our own eyes, subject to all new orders and laws, it becomes morally impossible to remain silent. We must speak; and tell the truth ... We advise you not to believe the propaganda trumpeting about the local "atrocities" ... What did Hitler do? He stopped the process of Bolshevization in Germany and did this the greatest service to all of Europe ... While Mussolini leads Italy, and Hitler leads Germany - European culture is given a respite. "

        “Patriotism, faith in the identity of the German people and the power of German genius, a sense of honor, readiness for sacrificial service, discipline, social justice and extra-class, fraternal nationwide unity ... In a word - this spirit that makes German National Socialism akin to Italian fascism. However, not only with him, but also with the spirit of the Russian white movement ... "
  5. +10
    April 30 2019 08: 45
    Quote: bober1982
    Comrades, they got to Ilyin, his name excites their minds, recorded the great Russian philosopher on the counter.

    That's right. The great Russian philosopher Ilyin is the most ordinary contra. The ideologist of the ROVS. He wrote wonderful words: a natural and precious sense of spiritual dignity, unfortunately outdated and perverted into a FALSE doctrine of the alleged equality of people. At the same time, SENSE OF RANK fades .... (sense of rank = byd # lo should know its place) We have come to this. You are a hard worker, then you, your children and grandchildren will live in poverty. You are the boss, then you, your children and grandchildren will be bosses and live in luxury. The son of Rogozin-runs the corporation, the son of Patrushev - Minister of Agriculture, etc. SENSE OF RANK. Brezhnev-land surveyor, Kosygin-master at the factory, Gorbachev-combine, Marshal Zhukov, sales manager. The philosopher Ilyin is a monarchist to the bone, with all the ensuing consequences. The people for power are the second oil.
    1. -7
      April 30 2019 09: 06
      Quote: Fevralsk. Morev
      The great Russian philosopher Ilyin is the most ordinary counter

      Just the opposite? By the way, Ilyin, a monarchist, a Russian nationalist and religious philosopher, had a great influence on Solzhenitsyn.
      1. +6
        April 30 2019 09: 32
        Quote: bober1982
        Ilyin, a monarchist, a Russian nationalist and religious philosopher, had a great influence on Solzhenitsyn.

        Solzhi'nicyn is a worthy student of his teacher.
        I do not like Ilyin at least because liberals of all stripes adore him.
        1. -4
          April 30 2019 09: 38
          Quote: Boris55
          I do not like Ilyin at least because liberals of all stripes adore him.

          Yes, have mercy on how liberals can adore a Russian nationalist, what are you saying.
      2. +3
        April 30 2019 12: 05
        Well, there are two boots of a pair. -RENEGATES.
        1. -2
          April 30 2019 12: 11
          Quote: Seeker
          Renegades

          What renegades they are, they do not fit this definition; the famous opportunist was Kautsky Karl, so Lenin called him a renegade.
  6. +7
    April 30 2019 09: 34
    Quote: bober1982
    had a great influence on Solzhenitsyn.

    That's right. The Gulag archipelago with tens of millions of people shot, tons of slops to our country. The influence of Ilyin. I heard that Putin considers Ilyin his spiritual mentor. It all fits together. Or is Solzhenitsyn authority for you?
    1. -7
      April 30 2019 09: 40
      Quote: Fevralsk. Morev
      Or is Solzhenitsyn authority for you?

      Solzhenitsyn is not credibility for me, but he is an honest man, a Russian writer, and he is respected.
      1. +6
        April 30 2019 12: 13
        But you won’t hear anything else from you. Admit it. It would be funny. To hear from your like-minded Olgovich declaration of love for the USSR!
      2. +5
        April 30 2019 12: 42
        Quote: bober1982
        Solzhenitsyn is not credibility for me, but he is an honest man, a Russian writer, and he is respected.

        --------------------
        A man writing somewhere in Denver, for me, is, for example, an American writer.
        1. 0
          April 30 2019 12: 49
          Bunin, writing somewhere in Paris, was apparently a French writer.
          1. +2
            April 30 2019 13: 58
            Quote: bober1982
            Bunin, writing somewhere in Paris, was apparently a French writer.

            ------------------------
            By the way, Nabokov considered himself an American, not a Russian writer. It is quite possible to apply this formula to Bunin, because for me the world literature does not have a national identity.
  7. +5
    April 30 2019 12: 40
    I looked just now "Quiet Don" in the classic version and noted for myself the nuances inherent in the present time. Nuance first - a worker came to the Cossacks and introduced himself as "Russians", although he has a characteristic name and surname Shtokman Yakov Isaakovich. The second nuance is that the Cossacks in the conversation disdain the Russians and consider the Cossacks not as an estate, but as a people. To which Shtokman reasonably objected to them that the Cossacks came from runaway slaves who fled to the borders of Russia. The Cossacks were in the mass a people, not that dark and uneducated, they knew how to read and write, but did not have a broad outlook. Then they were confused by the scenes of the execution, where relatives killed each other, some of course were for the Whites, others for the Reds, in general, loaded with propaganda. Then the scenes of the execution of both whites and podtelkovites. In general, the example of a great work shows the tragedy of the people involved in the Civil War. I looked from the position of a neutral man in the street, without getting up, as it were, on someone's side, to see how it looks from the outside.
  8. +9
    April 30 2019 13: 05
    Quote: bober1982

    Yes, have mercy on how liberals can adore a Russian nationalist, what are you saying.

    Liberals adore anyone who hates the USSR. The principle "the enemy of my enemy is my friend" has not been canceled.
  9. +3
    April 30 2019 18: 56
    Regarding the collapse of the Kolchak army after this offensive, in October 1919, Lieutenant L.A. Govorov, along with the soldiers of his battery, turned to the Reds when he realized that he was not fighting those. In the battles of Kakhovka and Perekop, Leonid Aleksandrovich proved himself to be a thoughtful, energetic, and strong-willed artillery commander. For the successful use of artillery against tanks and cavalry of Wrangel, he was awarded the first combat award - the Order of the Red Banner. Subsequently became a marshal.
    1. +5
      April 30 2019 21: 51
      Quote: Aviator_
      Regarding the collapse of the Kolchak army after this offensive, in October 1919, Lieutenant L.A. Govorov, along with the soldiers of his battery, turned to the Reds when he realized that he was not fighting those. In the battles of Kakhovka and Perekop, Leonid Aleksandrovich proved himself to be a thoughtful, energetic, and strong-willed artillery commander. For the successful use of artillery against tanks and cavalry of Wrangel, he was awarded the first combat award - the Order of the Red Banner. Subsequently became a marshal.

      "when I realized that he was at war with the wrong ones," in fact, that is why the whites lost the Civil War, because they fought against their people to preserve their privileges. During the war, the people told them "no". And what is going on with us right now.

"Right Sector" (banned in Russia), "Ukrainian Insurgent Army" (UPA) (banned in Russia), ISIS (banned in Russia), "Jabhat Fatah al-Sham" formerly "Jabhat al-Nusra" (banned in Russia) , Taliban (banned in Russia), Al-Qaeda (banned in Russia), Anti-Corruption Foundation (banned in Russia), Navalny Headquarters (banned in Russia), Facebook (banned in Russia), Instagram (banned in Russia), Meta (banned in Russia), Misanthropic Division (banned in Russia), Azov (banned in Russia), Muslim Brotherhood (banned in Russia), Aum Shinrikyo (banned in Russia), AUE (banned in Russia), UNA-UNSO (banned in Russia), Mejlis of the Crimean Tatar People (banned in Russia), Legion “Freedom of Russia” (armed formation, recognized as terrorist in the Russian Federation and banned)

“Non-profit organizations, unregistered public associations or individuals performing the functions of a foreign agent,” as well as media outlets performing the functions of a foreign agent: “Medusa”; "Voice of America"; "Realities"; "Present time"; "Radio Freedom"; Ponomarev Lev; Ponomarev Ilya; Savitskaya; Markelov; Kamalyagin; Apakhonchich; Makarevich; Dud; Gordon; Zhdanov; Medvedev; Fedorov; Mikhail Kasyanov; "Owl"; "Alliance of Doctors"; "RKK" "Levada Center"; "Memorial"; "Voice"; "Person and law"; "Rain"; "Mediazone"; "Deutsche Welle"; QMS "Caucasian Knot"; "Insider"; "New Newspaper"