Results of the week. There is no evidence, but "we have no doubt"
More control?
Circus telegram show is gaining momentum. Apparently, yes, our power holding bureaucrats just needed this bucket of cold water on their heads or a wet rag over it.
To create a problem and to overcome it courageously, while stating that problems have arisen with overcoming the problem - here is a brief description of the hostilities against the Telegram messenger. The result was: Telegram received additional advertising, Roskomnadzor - anti-advertising. Meanwhile, in the media this week there was information that in fact the struggle goes not so much with Telegram messenger, as with Durov, who decided to launch his cryptocurrency. The state wants more control, more! ..
Comments from our readers:
Jjj
Winnie76
Alex_59
K.A.S.
Armenian velvet
The events unfolding in Armenia are becoming more and more alarming, clearly marking the threat to the very future of the state and the security of Russia's southern borders.
“Velvet” began everything in a number of other countries. Perhaps the only case of velvet in recent decades has become Czechoslovakia, which at the same time ceased to exist as a single country. The Czechs and Slovaks did not like each other to live in a single state, so far they cannot explain.
And the rest of the scale "velvet" eventually turned into a lot of blood. An indicative case is Ukraine. Where until now, lovers of lace panties can not figure out how it turned out that in the end the price of panties became comparable to the price of statehood. But in my heart they still hope that America will help. Are there any people in Armenia who have such hopes? Maybe even Turkey ask for democratic assistance?
Comments from our readers:
Ravik
Opera
Hbvkzyby
Bandera revenge tank
Kiev security forces struck an artillery strike on the Luhansk region tonight, where equipment is being prepared for participation in the Victory Parade on May 9. As a result of the shelling, the tank was damaged during World War II, which was supposed to take part in the Victory Parade of 9 in May, as well as four units of military equipment of the People’s Police of LPR.
To fight with monuments and rarities is generally Maidan. And to defeat the T-34 tank, - so it is in general, read the blood feud ... Judge for yourself - how many “thirty-four” brought trouble to those whose descendants are marching today with torches in Kiev and Lviv? That pussy little soul did not calm down. It turns out that they have revenged the tank for the “DIDs”, who have kept the shape of the Waffen-SS battalions in the chests ...
Comments from our readers:
oleg-gr
Ytsuk
Sergey985
Archivist Vasya
The unnamed source and PGRK "Rubezh"
Some time ago, in the media with links to unnamed sources, it was reported that the Rubezh mobile ground-based missile system (PGRK) created for the Strategic Rocket Forces successfully passed almost all flight design and state tests into the 2018-2027 state weapons program. supposedly missed. What is the reason for this and what connection can this decision have (if it ever existed at all) with the Treaty on Intermediate-Range and Shorter-Range Missiles (the INF Treaty)?
When it comes to media reports with reference to an “unnamed source,” then you can get to such discussions, which will not seem like a little. If a certain source says that the Rubezh PGRK did not enter the state armaments program, then tomorrow there will be another source that may doubt the adequacy of the first source. By the way, in Russia the circle of mass media has already been defined, in which there is no sensation, then certainly with reference to an unnamed source. Any heresy so you can push ...
Comments from our readers:
Andrewkor
san4es
misti1973
About NATO romance with Ruslans
The Russian airline Volga-Dnepr has notified the NATO command of the termination of the provision of services for the transportation of forces and assets of the Alliance with An-124 Ruslan aircraft. This decision was made before the rocket attack on Syria 14 in April by the US, UK and France.
And can you imagine for a moment that American companies in our time would serve the transfer of Russian military personnel and equipment, for example, for rotational purposes in Transnistria? Och.ch. it is difficult ... Although some American businessmen manage to load coal in Novorossiysk and sell it at an exorbitant price to Ukraine under the guise of the Pennsylvania democratic. Of course, things seem to be different - military and non-military - but still, Marx's thesis about capitalists and their pursuit of profit should not be forgotten. Some comrades are already saying to us here that, they say, this is an economic “suicide”, they themselves, they say, chop down the economic branch on which you sit. Somewhere we have already heard ... Oh, yes - Cudrinomics with Kudrilogia
Comments from our readers:
Turgon
Mihail177
den3080
Claims to Kazakhstan? And the stigma themselves are not in the gun? ..
The Russian resolution in the UN Security Council, which refers to an act of aggression against an independent state, in addition to Russia itself, is supported by two more states - members of the Security Council. This is the People's Republic of China and Bolivia. 8 members of the Security Council spoke against the document: the USA, France, Britain, Poland, Kuwait, Sweden, the Netherlands, Côte d'Ivoire (5 of eight are members of NATO, Sweden is already thinking about joining). And Kazakhstan decided to abstain.
Well, we still have not learned to believe in the brotherhood of nations. And the whole highlight is that it would be strange to be offended in this situation not only by the people, even by the authorities of Kazakhstan. Isn’t Kazakhstan headed by the same Nursultan Nazarbayev, until the very last, tried to keep the Union — even at the moment when the famous bathing trio in Viskuly already called George Bush with statements that they had designed the collapse. So, Kazakhstan is quite seriously afraid that they might “throw” it. And therefore, questions on voting should still be considered with an eye on historical retrospective.
Comments from our readers:
Piramidon
Xnumx vis
Mwg
askort154
Normal
Airplane bright future
According to Yu. Borisov, the existing Su-33 and MiG-29K aircraft will gradually become obsolete, as a result, after about 10 years, the development of new aircraft will be required. At the same time, the military department already has plans for this. They provide for the development and production of new aircraft with a shortened or vertical take-off and landing.
In the future, of course, everything will be fine. No wonder it is bright. And therefore for planes with vertical takeoff, there is a place. The main thing is to believe. This time. Well, do not sit folded legs. These are two. Well, for now we will deal with the present.
Comments from our readers:
Borik
Andrey1978
Per se.
NI tank battle
14 April edition has published a new article with the traditionally loud title of “The T-90 Is Dangerous Weapon. Could It Beat America's Best Tank in Battle? ”(“ Russian T-90 is a dangerous weapon. Can it defeat America’s best tank in a battle? ”). As the title suggests, the author of the article, Charlie Gao, tried to compare the latest combat vehicles of the Russian armed forces and the American army. The newest model of modernized Russian-made equipment “participates” in this comparison, and therefore it is of particular interest.
Again, NI specialists with comparisons. It becomes their fad. Already looming on the horizon is a sort of Syrian Prokhorovka, where hundreds of T-90M and Abrams will come together in a fight. Certainly tank battle. If not in Syria, then on the banks of the Daugava. And it’s good that there are authors at the National Interest - at least there will be someone to ask for who will win in this fight ... Answer from NI: The strongest will win ... Such an analyst.
Comments from our readers:
okko077
kan123
Cxnumx
Let's call things by their names
The times of easy-to-perform and hastily prepared massive missile strikes of the Western coalition against undesirable states are coming to an end. Today, most “objectionables” have at their disposal military-technical means that pose a serious threat to both the means of air attack and their carriers. This confirms the questionable effectiveness of the missile strike inflicted by the West on the strategic military facilities of Syria.
By the way, in the West they do not feel the euphoria of the “victorious” strike at the SAR. Mr. Trump thanked the two France and Britain for the fact that the authorities of these countries supported the missile attack, but the Western press is critical about this.
For example, the AFP news agency explicitly announced the intervention of the United States, France and Britain in the course of the civil war in Syria.
And the German edition of the “Frankfurter Allgemeine Zeitung” almost gladly underlines that Chancellor Merkel has “prudently refused” to participate in the strikes against Syria.
A little more, and Europe, with the exception of Britain and France, will call Trump the aggressor.
Comments from our readers:
zyzx
zulusuluz
co-creator
Sergey985
Stas157
Captain45
Thanks for the rocket. They are already being studied
After American strikes on Syria, curious information appeared in the Western media: they say that during the bombing, the American high-precision air-to-surface cruise missiles AGM-158 JASSM were used for the first time.
However, there is no official confirmation of the use of these missiles. The media refer only to anonymous sources close to the operation.
Another source, also anonymous, spoke in Russia.
Two unexploded cruise missiles of the Western coalition and other precision-guided munitions were delivered to Russia from Syria, a military source told Interfax. "The list of high-precision ammunition samples delivered from Syria after the Saturday rocket attack is not limited to two cruise missiles," he said. According to the source, they are already being studied by Russian specialists. In particular, the management and navigation system, the radio-absorbing coating of the hull, and the element base are analyzed.
By the way, the expert who commented on the message about the delivery of missiles to Russia, confirmed: the missiles that were used by France and the United Kingdom are quite new. And the American rocket Tomahawk Block IV is also of interest.
In a word, thanks for the rockets, western gentlemen! They are already being studied.
Comments from our readers:
ALEXX.
NIKNN
Kent0001
just exp
Zubr
Monos
She ran away
The British newspaper The Times, citing its sources in military circles, argues that the strike submarine of the Royal Navy of Great Britain was unable to strike cruise missiles at Syria due to the opposition of two Russian submarines of the 636 Varshavyanka project. Quote:
And here is the result of the “operation” using the above-mentioned submarine: NATO silence!
Apparently, this NATO operation showed an extremely low effect, close to zero. After all, the British submarine, which has on board twenty Tomahawk cruise missiles, did not launch any!
The launch of even one rocket would give the exact location of the submarine. And so the royal sailors preferred underwater maneuvers to avoid detection. Simply put, they ran away from the Russians.
Comments from our readers:
zart_arn
Alex777
Geisenberg
No answer
The Minister of Foreign Affairs of the Russian Federation gave an interview to the British information service BBC. During the interview, the talk was about striking the US-Anglo-French trio on the territory of the Syrian Arab Republic. Lavrov once again repeated the thesis that for these countries actions without an answer from Russia will not remain. From the statement of Sergey Lavrov:
What actions can Russia take if Moscow “loses the last vestiges of trust in its Western friends,” the head of the Russian foreign ministry chose not to report. He didn’t tell exactly what actions Russia intends to take against Washington, London and Paris for an act of aggression against Syria.
Damascus is still in effect: the Syrian government army launched a tank attack on the positions of militants supported by the West, in the area of the administrative border of the provinces of Homs and Hama.
Comments from our readers:
Topotun
maxxavto
gaura
Abrascha
There is no evidence, but "we have no doubt"
The United States is not ready to demonstrate to the world public evidence of the use of chemical weapons by Syria in the Duma due to the secrecy of data, Pentagon spokeswoman Dana White said.
“But we have no doubt. Just a lot of this is related to intelligence. I'm glad to show evidence if I can do it. But we are very confident in the decision, "- reports RIA" Novosti "White's answer to the question of why they should not present evidence to the whole world.
By the way, the Russia24 TV channel showed a report from Eastern Guta, the main character of which was the same Syrian boy who was whipped with water in front of the camera, shouting something about the "use of chemical weapons". The boy’s name is Hassan Diab, and he, along with his family, told how the events were actually developing.
According to war correspondent Yevgeny Poddubny, the boy was promised a “generous reward”. A hungry child was offered dates, rice and cookies. And the boy’s father said that there was no chemical attack in the Duma, and all the statements of the militants were aimed only at one thing: to try to hold on to the Duma against the backdrop of the government offensive.
As we see, “White Helmets” and generally Western forces use all means to achieve goals. Taking advantage of the shortage of products, these figures decided to make the Syrian children hostage to the interests of those who themselves are actively sponsoring the white-eyed scenario, which was more than once the scenario.
This is the reason for raising the issue in the UN Security Council. "White helmets" it is high time to recognize a terrorist organization or accomplices of terrorists.
Comments from our readers:
Spartanez300
Vita vko
freddyk
Relations between Russia and Israel have become "fragile"
The Israeli Air Force continued to attack the Syrian Arab Republic. Al-Sheyrat airbase in the province of Homs was attacked again. This is reported by the Lebanese information resource AMN, with reference to its own sources. The report says that the air defense intercepted several missiles fired by Israeli aircraft. This is about intercepting 6 missiles.
At the Pentagon, journalists' requests were answered that this time the United States had nothing to do with the rocket attack on Syria.
Israeli officials do not comment on the reports of the Lebanese information portal.
And one more "Israeli" news.
The prospect of Russia supplying Damascus with modern air defense systems has greatly alarmed Israel, even more than the United States, writes the American edition of Bloomberg. The article says that Israeli analysts and former military consider the only option for Israel’s response to delivering Russian C-300 to Syria “an immediate attempt to destroy them”.
According to the author of the article, this would destroy the fragile relations between Israel and Russia, which kept the channels of communication open, despite the support of opposing sides in Syria.
Earlier, the Chief of the Main Operations Directorate of the General Staff of the Armed Forces of Russia, Colonel-General Sergei Rudskoy, said that Russia could return to considering the issue of supplying C-300 air defense systems to Syria and other countries.
As for the rocket attacks on Syria and interceptions of missiles, on the eve of the briefing, the representative of the Russian Defense Ministry Igor Konashenkov noted that in Syria, Pantsir systems were used to intercept missiles launched during the US-Anglo-French aggression.
Comments from our readers:
hrych
a housewife
Topotun
konstantin68
This is not a "Newbie." And it is not Russian
The research center in Switzerland, which analyzed the OPCW samples from the scene of the Salisbury incident, concluded that the substance BZ, which was in service with the United States and Britain, was used in Skripale poisoning, but was not done in the Russian Federation and the USSR, said Russian Foreign Minister Sergey Lavrov.
Later, the deputy director of the Institute of Strategic Studies and Forecasts of PFUR Nikita Danyuk explained why the Swiss laboratory, whose conclusions were referred to by Sergey Lavrov, did not comment on his words about BZ.
According to him, "at the moment, institutions that are responsible for regional and global security, including the OPCW, are subject to very serious pressure from external forces." Danyuk also believes that in the future at the official level it will be declared that Russia is not involved in the "Skripal case".
The assumption of the non-participation of Russia, voiced by any of the political figures of the West "at the official level", seems to us questionable. Is it possible that after twenty years some retired laboratory assistant or a retired special service agent who has drunk in a bar will share something of this sort. But that will not be the "official" position of Britain, or at least Switzerland.
And the one who will win the Cold War or will be able to stop it will be right. But in the fraternity and friendship of nations, more precisely, of states, in our time it is completely hard to believe.
Comments from our readers:
Ross xnumx
sounddoc
Sewer krainiy
Cuba without Castro
Important information came from Freedom Island: the head of state Raul Castro left his post due to deteriorating health. The National Assembly (the highest legislative body in Cuba) elected Miguel Dias-Kanel to the posts of the State Council and the Council of Ministers (both held Raul Castro).
It is unlikely that a change of leader can be considered a sensation, since 86-year-old Raul Castro himself raised the issue of the country's new leader.
The new head of the State Council of Cuba and the Council of Ministers 57 years. He was the only candidate for these posts. Voting in the National Assembly was held in secret. The result is known: the candidacy of Miguel Diaz-Kanel was supported by an 603 deputy. The total number of voters - 605 people.
Will the era change with the leader? So far, only one thing is known: the newly elected head of the State Council of Cuba noted that he will continue to follow the political course that Cuba has been following these years. This is a course on social equality and improving the welfare of citizens.
Comments from our readers:
APASUS
K.A.S.
seti
zombirusrev
Alber
Circus telegram show is gaining momentum. Apparently, yes, our power holding bureaucrats just needed this bucket of cold water on their heads or a wet rag over it.
To create a problem and to overcome it courageously, while stating that problems have arisen with overcoming the problem - here is a brief description of the hostilities against the Telegram messenger. The result was: Telegram received additional advertising, Roskomnadzor - anti-advertising. Meanwhile, in the media this week there was information that in fact the struggle goes not so much with Telegram messenger, as with Durov, who decided to launch his cryptocurrency. The state wants more control, more! ..
Comments from our readers:
Jjj
When the same citizen Durov discovered everything that is possible for our Western "partners", and even in developing countries of the "third world" behaves carefully and only in Russia he presents himself as an "irreconcilable fighter for rights", then questions arise. There is a practical anti-state activity.
Now let's see whether the gr. Durov wrote software? This was done by other people. Is it possible to guarantee the complete safety of correspondence from the fact that others will not see it? It is impossible, no matter how trying to convince us of the opposite. Is it possible to minimize the activities of the Telegram? There is such a technical possibility, and several other urgent tasks in this area are being solved. And do not forget that the very concept of the Internet overnight can become an anachronism when new technologies unfold.
Now let's see whether the gr. Durov wrote software? This was done by other people. Is it possible to guarantee the complete safety of correspondence from the fact that others will not see it? It is impossible, no matter how trying to convince us of the opposite. Is it possible to minimize the activities of the Telegram? There is such a technical possibility, and several other urgent tasks in this area are being solved. And do not forget that the very concept of the Internet overnight can become an anachronism when new technologies unfold.
Winnie76
Typical watchman syndrome. Don't let anyone go anywhere ...
Alex_59
I watch the reaction of people, ordinary people, my friends. Among them were a lot of people who are not interested in politics, or standing on solid conservative positions. And today, these people suddenly became opponents of the authorities and allies of Durov. Because they were born and grew up not only in the Soviet era (80-s), but also in the era of the free Internet (90-s). The power overnight made thousands of their opponents passively or moderately loyal to their opponents. Many more people, having seen such a move, said that from now on they set themselves telegrams and use them now, although before that they didn’t care.
And Durov is also becoming a symbol of freedom from an ordinary businessman. And now if he wants, he can easily transform this wave into a political plane with incredible success, inaccessible to Navalny and other Kasparov. The last - balaboly with a muddy past and zero list of successful cases. And Durov is a modern businessman, a man who made himself, a man who "did not want", but he was challenged and he fights with him. In general, he is now in a white raincoat proudly flying over the dull commonplace. Bingo!
And Durov is also becoming a symbol of freedom from an ordinary businessman. And now if he wants, he can easily transform this wave into a political plane with incredible success, inaccessible to Navalny and other Kasparov. The last - balaboly with a muddy past and zero list of successful cases. And Durov is a modern businessman, a man who made himself, a man who "did not want", but he was challenged and he fights with him. In general, he is now in a white raincoat proudly flying over the dull commonplace. Bingo!
K.A.S.
How many loud words! Read you, think straight, because of the blockage by a court decision, the uprising of Spartacus will soon begin or the Pugachev rebellion!
They ask the question, what was badly offered to Durov, and why did he not go for it? Do not you think that his sharaga under the tight cap of US intelligence? Do not be naive! and In a business with such rapid results (a billionaire over several years), they do not make themselves (IMHO).
They ask the question, what was badly offered to Durov, and why did he not go for it? Do not you think that his sharaga under the tight cap of US intelligence? Do not be naive! and In a business with such rapid results (a billionaire over several years), they do not make themselves (IMHO).
Armenian velvet
The events unfolding in Armenia are becoming more and more alarming, clearly marking the threat to the very future of the state and the security of Russia's southern borders.
“Velvet” began everything in a number of other countries. Perhaps the only case of velvet in recent decades has become Czechoslovakia, which at the same time ceased to exist as a single country. The Czechs and Slovaks did not like each other to live in a single state, so far they cannot explain.
And the rest of the scale "velvet" eventually turned into a lot of blood. An indicative case is Ukraine. Where until now, lovers of lace panties can not figure out how it turned out that in the end the price of panties became comparable to the price of statehood. But in my heart they still hope that America will help. Are there any people in Armenia who have such hopes? Maybe even Turkey ask for democratic assistance?
Comments from our readers:
Ravik
In another former republic, the jackal awoke ...
Opera
Only calm. And extremely pragmatic position! It is a time when, in a different way, Russia has no right to behave. On the ruins of the red empire, a mass of pseudo-independent states emerged, the majority of whose peoples continue to believe that Russia needs something and does not give enough to them! This does not interfere with their "independence"! As we all know well, pride attacks begin at the moment when the time comes to pay the bills! You can talk a lot about the influence of the United States - of course they do! But it's not just that! As in Ukraine, these grains of influence in Armenia fall into fertile soil! Talk to the Armenians ... Even from those living in Russia you will surely hear something like that - we would have returned Ararat long ago! Putin does not give! This is both verbatim and generalized and it is a fact! They will tell you exactly who Russia should sell weapon and who does not! They do not care at all whether Russia needs a conflict in Nagorno-Karabakh or not - they will explain to you on their fingers that if it were not for Russia they would ... See above about Mount Ararat! Let's face it - this is the direct influence of the generations born in the USSR, when Russia and Belarus only gave away! All and constantly! This habit has passed into the mentality. Look at Eastern Europe - they turned away from us as soon as the metropolis began to weaken! They helped us ?! They did not even think about it, they are almost all already in NATO! To those who say that the Americans are great, but we are not working, I recommend looking at the US allies in the latest attack on Syria ... Do we need such allies? If the Armenians decided to end their lives by collective suicide, even the next heroic Bayazet, organized by us, will not save them! So, what I want to say is that the internal situation in Armenia is the job of the Armenians themselves! Of course, there are thinking people there who understand what the western vector of development leads to, especially in such a "friendly" environment as the Armenians have! These people should explain to compatriots who is their friend and who is not! And of course we will help them! If such people are an insignificant minority, then we should not break our forehead against the wall and very much delve into the tremulousness of the Armenian mentality! Russia is not the Lord God! And the purchase of allies turns against the buyers themselves! Our business is our priorities and of course the army and navy!
Hbvkzyby
The direction of the CIS in the Ministry of Foreign Affairs should be accelerated for professional unsuitability.
Bandera revenge tank
Kiev security forces struck an artillery strike on the Luhansk region tonight, where equipment is being prepared for participation in the Victory Parade on May 9. As a result of the shelling, the tank was damaged during World War II, which was supposed to take part in the Victory Parade of 9 in May, as well as four units of military equipment of the People’s Police of LPR.
To fight with monuments and rarities is generally Maidan. And to defeat the T-34 tank, - so it is in general, read the blood feud ... Judge for yourself - how many “thirty-four” brought trouble to those whose descendants are marching today with torches in Kiev and Lviv? That pussy little soul did not calm down. It turns out that they have revenged the tank for the “DIDs”, who have kept the shape of the Waffen-SS battalions in the chests ...
Comments from our readers:
oleg-gr
This is certainly the natives from the country of U. If this grandfather and great-grandfather of 1941 did not have this technique, who of them would now live?
Ytsuk
I read all the comments - it is alarming for one thing - accurate shooting of the Ukrainian gunners.
Sergey985
Shoot the past with a pistol, the future will shoot a cannon at you! These creatures have no future.
Archivist Vasya
And what about the security of the Victory Parade itself?
The unnamed source and PGRK "Rubezh"
Some time ago, in the media with links to unnamed sources, it was reported that the Rubezh mobile ground-based missile system (PGRK) created for the Strategic Rocket Forces successfully passed almost all flight design and state tests into the 2018-2027 state weapons program. supposedly missed. What is the reason for this and what connection can this decision have (if it ever existed at all) with the Treaty on Intermediate-Range and Shorter-Range Missiles (the INF Treaty)?
When it comes to media reports with reference to an “unnamed source,” then you can get to such discussions, which will not seem like a little. If a certain source says that the Rubezh PGRK did not enter the state armaments program, then tomorrow there will be another source that may doubt the adequacy of the first source. By the way, in Russia the circle of mass media has already been defined, in which there is no sensation, then certainly with reference to an unnamed source. Any heresy so you can push ...
Comments from our readers:
Andrewkor
All rockets are good, choose to taste! But money is elementary for everything Wunderwaffen lacks. Where not to throw, everywhere a wedge. What is going on with the state program, VO readers are well aware. Unlike the USA, the printing press seems to be under control.
san4es
In the photo in the article, the anti-ship coastal complex ... In the article they write about the missile complex with a small-sized ICBM.
misti1973
All this is actually a discussion of non-existent things. Except Yars. They moved one project, abandoned another ... Maybe it will work out with Vanguard?
About NATO romance with Ruslans
The Russian airline Volga-Dnepr has notified the NATO command of the termination of the provision of services for the transportation of forces and assets of the Alliance with An-124 Ruslan aircraft. This decision was made before the rocket attack on Syria 14 in April by the US, UK and France.
And can you imagine for a moment that American companies in our time would serve the transfer of Russian military personnel and equipment, for example, for rotational purposes in Transnistria? Och.ch. it is difficult ... Although some American businessmen manage to load coal in Novorossiysk and sell it at an exorbitant price to Ukraine under the guise of the Pennsylvania democratic. Of course, things seem to be different - military and non-military - but still, Marx's thesis about capitalists and their pursuit of profit should not be forgotten. Some comrades are already saying to us here that, they say, this is an economic “suicide”, they themselves, they say, chop down the economic branch on which you sit. Somewhere we have already heard ... Oh, yes - Cudrinomics with Kudrilogia
Comments from our readers:
Turgon
Let's not blame as well. Beckon us with a honey dollar, we will provide our own planes to choose from. Precedents have already been.
Mihail177
And why not with 1 May of the current year? They do not impose sanctions a year after the announcement, but immediately ... and why should we pull something?
den3080
It was of course ingenious to haul enemy loads. With EBN, it started. It is good that everything is gradually being brought into conformity with reality.
Claims to Kazakhstan? And the stigma themselves are not in the gun? ..
The Russian resolution in the UN Security Council, which refers to an act of aggression against an independent state, in addition to Russia itself, is supported by two more states - members of the Security Council. This is the People's Republic of China and Bolivia. 8 members of the Security Council spoke against the document: the USA, France, Britain, Poland, Kuwait, Sweden, the Netherlands, Côte d'Ivoire (5 of eight are members of NATO, Sweden is already thinking about joining). And Kazakhstan decided to abstain.
Well, we still have not learned to believe in the brotherhood of nations. And the whole highlight is that it would be strange to be offended in this situation not only by the people, even by the authorities of Kazakhstan. Isn’t Kazakhstan headed by the same Nursultan Nazarbayev, until the very last, tried to keep the Union — even at the moment when the famous bathing trio in Viskuly already called George Bush with statements that they had designed the collapse. So, Kazakhstan is quite seriously afraid that they might “throw” it. And therefore, questions on voting should still be considered with an eye on historical retrospective.
Comments from our readers:
Piramidon
Kazakhs (people) and Nazarbayev (the ruling elite) are still slightly different concepts.
Xnumx vis
Kuchma in Ukraine finished badly in "multi-vector". Russia celebrated the Russian land with all sorts of muddy formations. They created "republics" - fifteen republics - fifteen sisters. Popular fraternity fire unquenchable. The specific khans and dukes with the princes sat down firmly. Betrayed desperately. For thirty pieces of silver ready to betray their mother.
Mwg
Exactly. And now these "little sisters" who are trying to marry a transatlantic guy are trying to jump out, and who are just spending the night with him. The guy seems to be major: we can make earrings, he will treat you to a hamburger, roll it on the helicopter, or just send a bubble dough))
askort154
Nazarbayev for 22 billion. Trump’s shoes will be cleaned if he “asks.”
Russia does not have friends, there are parasites. Just like the USA.
Russia does not have friends, there are parasites. Just like the USA.
Normal
In principle, nothing new in this world has been revealed. They always try to make friends with the strong, although the stronger one will not loom. You can hardly be offended by this, but it’s necessary to take it into account.
Airplane bright future
According to Yu. Borisov, the existing Su-33 and MiG-29K aircraft will gradually become obsolete, as a result, after about 10 years, the development of new aircraft will be required. At the same time, the military department already has plans for this. They provide for the development and production of new aircraft with a shortened or vertical take-off and landing.
In the future, of course, everything will be fine. No wonder it is bright. And therefore for planes with vertical takeoff, there is a place. The main thing is to believe. This time. Well, do not sit folded legs. These are two. Well, for now we will deal with the present.
Comments from our readers:
Borik
If they really decide to create such a plane, the babak will go, I think three times more than on the SU-57. Or our people want to show the mattress to us, that we like two fingers on the asphalt to create a plane with better TTX than their F-35. Create something to create, I do not argue. But whether we need it.
Andrey1978
And from the factory in Saratov, where these planes were assembled, they made a shopping center ... Several specialists personally know who participated in this program. Now they are old already, but there is no new shift of specialists.
Per se.
Can a plane with a "classic take-off" start from a short platform or from a ravine, pit? No, he can not. Can the VTOL aircraft use the start with the classic take-off and with the classic landing, yes it can. In wildlife, the "classic start" is used extremely rarely, shortened, and, especially, vertical, - the basis. Sooner or later, VTOL will become, if not the basis of the aircraft fleet, then rationally complement the range of capabilities of aircraft, which require helicopters, and convertiplanes, and VTOL. Fleet such machines are needed, moreover, not as an alternative to deck ejection aircraft, but as an addition to ships such as UDC or light aircraft carriers. VTOL will also be needed for unpaved airfields, especially in the event of destruction of a multi-kilometer runway and the entire aviation infrastructure of airfields, along with the aircraft of the "classic take-off and landing."
NI tank battle
14 April edition has published a new article with the traditionally loud title of “The T-90 Is Dangerous Weapon. Could It Beat America's Best Tank in Battle? ”(“ Russian T-90 is a dangerous weapon. Can it defeat America’s best tank in a battle? ”). As the title suggests, the author of the article, Charlie Gao, tried to compare the latest combat vehicles of the Russian armed forces and the American army. The newest model of modernized Russian-made equipment “participates” in this comparison, and therefore it is of particular interest.
Again, NI specialists with comparisons. It becomes their fad. Already looming on the horizon is a sort of Syrian Prokhorovka, where hundreds of T-90M and Abrams will come together in a fight. Certainly tank battle. If not in Syria, then on the banks of the Daugava. And it’s good that there are authors at the National Interest - at least there will be someone to ask for who will win in this fight ... Answer from NI: The strongest will win ... Such an analyst.
Comments from our readers:
okko077
Another gingerbread for dummies ... How much can you repeat that tanks are not used in a modern war, neither in the first nor in the second echelon !!! There is no need to project wars with partisans on a full-scale confrontation in Europe and other regions where the Americans will be in the ranks of the enemy .... tanks on the front line will be successfully destroyed by modern anti-tank weapons. who do not fall into the zone of their return fire ... And Armata will also burn ... Publish similar promotional articles for buyers of our tanks in other countries, why "hang noodles on the ears" to our readers.
Better talk about the complete absence of intelligence and target designation information in our tank units to protect at least against enemy helicopters, the ability to conduct this intelligence and target designation in real time ... Then, rather, after creating such systems, you can evaluate new opportunities and prospects tank strikes ... And so in all the troops .... Our new equipment is blind and deaf and does not see the enemy, there is no Combat Information Systems ... Syria has shown everything, there is nothing, we are not able to fight in a new way .... Instead BIS there spotters suicide bombers from the SSO for target designation ... who suffer losses and receive awards, and that is without ... a ground component ...
Better talk about the complete absence of intelligence and target designation information in our tank units to protect at least against enemy helicopters, the ability to conduct this intelligence and target designation in real time ... Then, rather, after creating such systems, you can evaluate new opportunities and prospects tank strikes ... And so in all the troops .... Our new equipment is blind and deaf and does not see the enemy, there is no Combat Information Systems ... Syria has shown everything, there is nothing, we are not able to fight in a new way .... Instead BIS there spotters suicide bombers from the SSO for target designation ... who suffer losses and receive awards, and that is without ... a ground component ...
kan123
This (not yet) nonsense was launched at Gorbachev - “why would we need these aircraft - they would take the whole standard of living away from us - without these tanks - missiles, everyone would have lived in Santa Barbara”.
Bombed, and then what? Put the sentries with jeeps on every corner? You would continue the thought, understand how stupid it is. A tank is the main strength of the army, and it always remains, and the fact that it is vulnerable in something is questions for engineers, which means they have problems or need to be changed.
Bombed, and then what? Put the sentries with jeeps on every corner? You would continue the thought, understand how stupid it is. A tank is the main strength of the army, and it always remains, and the fact that it is vulnerable in something is questions for engineers, which means they have problems or need to be changed.
Cxnumx
"Having studied the two newest armored vehicles, he came to the conclusion that the T-90M and M1A2 SEP v.3 will most likely be the winner of a tank with a more experienced and trained crew." We know this even by WWII when the Oskin crew on the T-34-85 burned royal tigers)))
Let's call things by their names
The times of easy-to-perform and hastily prepared massive missile strikes of the Western coalition against undesirable states are coming to an end. Today, most “objectionables” have at their disposal military-technical means that pose a serious threat to both the means of air attack and their carriers. This confirms the questionable effectiveness of the missile strike inflicted by the West on the strategic military facilities of Syria.
Did outdated air defense systems alone participate in the destruction of American missiles? Experts are not sure
On the reaction of European media to the missile attack of the SAR
Fiasco "beautiful and smart." Technical points failing Syria
Missiles shot down, but targets destroyed. The right look at things
On the reaction of European media to the missile attack of the SAR
Fiasco "beautiful and smart." Technical points failing Syria
Missiles shot down, but targets destroyed. The right look at things
By the way, in the West they do not feel the euphoria of the “victorious” strike at the SAR. Mr. Trump thanked the two France and Britain for the fact that the authorities of these countries supported the missile attack, but the Western press is critical about this.
For example, the AFP news agency explicitly announced the intervention of the United States, France and Britain in the course of the civil war in Syria.
And the German edition of the “Frankfurter Allgemeine Zeitung” almost gladly underlines that Chancellor Merkel has “prudently refused” to participate in the strikes against Syria.
A little more, and Europe, with the exception of Britain and France, will call Trump the aggressor.
Comments from our readers:
zyzx
Trump reached his goals, declared victory, the Yankees in joy. And we should not have so much fun while we were shooting down rockets, knowing where they were going.
zulusuluz
And the task of the short-range air defense system is precisely to protect the object, not the territory ... And they will not send the missile to destroy the latrine ... Therefore, we already know where the missiles will go. The most important thing was that they did not know when and from what direction.
co-creator
Everything speaks of what they knew, when, where, and the direction too. Trump did not set out to hurt Assad. The goal was to show who was the boss, and he showed that he would strike at any moment, and the Russian Federation would not be able to prevent him and would simply agree to the maximum for such conditions. The Russian Federation has shown that it does not have the strength or the spirit to protect its interests. Only today the United States agreed on a strike, and tomorrow they would simply warn and strike a real blow.
Sergey985
All three parties solved their problems. And they decided.
Stas157
Transfer money? Militarily? The United States beat our military ally with impunity, Konashenkov proudly reports that Russian air defense did not take part! This is how to perceive, as an invitation to strike more? I already wrote that this strike took place only because Russia never responds to the blows of its partners. Otherwise, the United States would never have decided on such a blow. Also: if this blow remained unanswered, then you need to wait for the next one.
This is a very simple event logic, which always works in life, but for some reason, the majority here try to ignore it. Instead, they are engaged in auto-training: they say, we won everybody again!
This is a very simple event logic, which always works in life, but for some reason, the majority here try to ignore it. Instead, they are engaged in auto-training: they say, we won everybody again!
Captain45
Like in football: a draw in a foreign field. Although such a draw on the balls counts as a victory.
Thanks for the rocket. They are already being studied
After American strikes on Syria, curious information appeared in the Western media: they say that during the bombing, the American high-precision air-to-surface cruise missiles AGM-158 JASSM were used for the first time.
However, there is no official confirmation of the use of these missiles. The media refer only to anonymous sources close to the operation.
Another source, also anonymous, spoke in Russia.
Two unexploded cruise missiles of the Western coalition and other precision-guided munitions were delivered to Russia from Syria, a military source told Interfax. "The list of high-precision ammunition samples delivered from Syria after the Saturday rocket attack is not limited to two cruise missiles," he said. According to the source, they are already being studied by Russian specialists. In particular, the management and navigation system, the radio-absorbing coating of the hull, and the element base are analyzed.
When striking Syria, the US experienced the latest missiles
The two surviving US coalition rockets are already in Russia. And not only they
The two surviving US coalition rockets are already in Russia. And not only they
By the way, the expert who commented on the message about the delivery of missiles to Russia, confirmed: the missiles that were used by France and the United Kingdom are quite new. And the American rocket Tomahawk Block IV is also of interest.
In a word, thanks for the rockets, western gentlemen! They are already being studied.
Comments from our readers:
ALEXX.
Were these superpuperrakety?
NIKNN
They say they were. The rocket is not bad. The point is that it is relatively new, the last modification is something under 1300 km range (the previous modification was one-third closer), the launch without entering the air defense zone ... Well, all missiles are modernized and everywhere, in fact, after upgrading become new ...
Kent0001
And it turns out that they were shot down by the Soviet air defense system overgrown with moss, which no one took into account? Then it is American slag, not a superracket.
just exp
1. Not the fact that these missiles were shot down.
2. “Armor” and “Buk-M2” didn’t manage to overgrow with moss.
2. “Armor” and “Buk-M2” didn’t manage to overgrow with moss.
Zubr
This is an ambush for our "partners." Probably, in Brussels, all the hair pulled out in immodest places ...
Monos
Trump's smart rockets decided to surrender. Indeed, clever!
She ran away
The British newspaper The Times, citing its sources in military circles, argues that the strike submarine of the Royal Navy of Great Britain was unable to strike cruise missiles at Syria due to the opposition of two Russian submarines of the 636 Varshavyanka project. Quote:
While British Prime Minister Theresa May made the decision to strike at Syria, drama was unfolding in the waters of the Eastern Mediterranean. A submarine of the Royal Navy, armed with cruise missiles, was supposed to be pursued by at least one, and possibly two Russian, submarines, which, for the extraordinary difficulty of detection in the West, were dubbed Black Holes. In addition, apparently, two Russian frigates and one anti-submarine aircraft were also engaged in the search for a British submarine. The Astute class submarine spent several days in this “tense and dangerous contest” to avoid detection.
And here is the result of the “operation” using the above-mentioned submarine: NATO silence!
Apparently, this NATO operation showed an extremely low effect, close to zero. After all, the British submarine, which has on board twenty Tomahawk cruise missiles, did not launch any!
The launch of even one rocket would give the exact location of the submarine. And so the royal sailors preferred underwater maneuvers to avoid detection. Simply put, they ran away from the Russians.
Comments from our readers:
zart_arn
Respect our submariners.
Alex777
Brit stupidly saved money. And they charged us off.
Geisenberg
One "Varshavyanka" apparently held the tail, and the second, apparently, did not allow to open the hatches of the rocket mines or from what they were shooting there ... They are such as "Varshavyanka", always piling in bulk and not following the lyuly rules!
No answer
The Minister of Foreign Affairs of the Russian Federation gave an interview to the British information service BBC. During the interview, the talk was about striking the US-Anglo-French trio on the territory of the Syrian Arab Republic. Lavrov once again repeated the thesis that for these countries actions without an answer from Russia will not remain. From the statement of Sergey Lavrov:
The consequences will definitely be. In essence, we are losing the last vestiges of trust in our western friends. First, they carry out punishment in the Duma in Syria, and then wait for the OPCW experts to conduct an on-site inspection. This proof through punishment is applied by a troika of western countries. Strikes on the basis of stuffing in social networks ...
Went otvetka. Meat grinder for pro-American militants on the border of Hama and Homs
US Assistant Secretary of State: The attack of Russian mercenaries on our forces in the SAR failed
US Assistant Secretary of State: The attack of Russian mercenaries on our forces in the SAR failed
What actions can Russia take if Moscow “loses the last vestiges of trust in its Western friends,” the head of the Russian foreign ministry chose not to report. He didn’t tell exactly what actions Russia intends to take against Washington, London and Paris for an act of aggression against Syria.
Damascus is still in effect: the Syrian government army launched a tank attack on the positions of militants supported by the West, in the area of the administrative border of the provinces of Homs and Hama.
Comments from our readers:
Topotun
Admittedly, GDP is a very cool player. He not only does not allow our country to be drawn into a war with Europe, but it effectively responds to attacks. God grant that there is always enough determination. As for our retaliatory actions, we declared that only when there was a direct threat to OUR citizens ... And even so, we seem to be on the sidelines, and the coalition’s blow of fire has turned out to be ...
maxxavto
And the warning of otvetku also remained valid.
gaura
They promised otvetku in the event of a threat to the lives of our servicemen so that this threat would not exist, the Americans warned where they were going to bomb. This was news. In the end, everyone is happy: they spat on evil Russians, bombed a bloody tyrant, the people rejoice. The Syrians did not get much damage, too happy. We have tested the systems in the fight against their missiles, generally cool. And everything would be fine if it were not for these promises to destroy the carriers. I am sure that they would not farted even if there was a threat. And when this threat is, when the coffins float to their homeland? Erdogan won some tomatoes answered for the downed aircraft. You do not need to make such loud statements, so that later would not be ashamed.
Abrascha
I want to note that no one promised anything to anybody, not to the Syrians, a few days ago, neither to the Russians in the Donbas in the spring of 2014 of the year. Well, if people there invented something in their heads, well, it’s still their own business.)))) It’s not forbidden to dream and dream something there.))) And the leadership of the Russian Federation always stood and will stand on firm and balanced position of respect for international law and other blah, blah, blah. Well, I think you yourself have heard it all, too lazy to trample on Claudia))))
There is no evidence, but "we have no doubt"
The United States is not ready to demonstrate to the world public evidence of the use of chemical weapons by Syria in the Duma due to the secrecy of data, Pentagon spokeswoman Dana White said.
“But we have no doubt. Just a lot of this is related to intelligence. I'm glad to show evidence if I can do it. But we are very confident in the decision, "- reports RIA" Novosti "White's answer to the question of why they should not present evidence to the whole world.
By the way, the Russia24 TV channel showed a report from Eastern Guta, the main character of which was the same Syrian boy who was whipped with water in front of the camera, shouting something about the "use of chemical weapons". The boy’s name is Hassan Diab, and he, along with his family, told how the events were actually developing.
We were in the basement. Mom told me that today there is nothing to eat, we'll eat only tomorrow. We heard a scream on the street, shouting: "Go to the hospital!" We ran to the hospital, and as soon as I entered, they grabbed me and began to pour water. After that, they put us on a bed with other people.
According to war correspondent Yevgeny Poddubny, the boy was promised a “generous reward”. A hungry child was offered dates, rice and cookies. And the boy’s father said that there was no chemical attack in the Duma, and all the statements of the militants were aimed only at one thing: to try to hold on to the Duma against the backdrop of the government offensive.
This is a secret! The Pentagon can not provide "evidence" himataki in the Duma
"White helmets" took advantage of a hungry child for a fake about himatake in the Duma
"White helmets" took advantage of a hungry child for a fake about himatake in the Duma
As we see, “White Helmets” and generally Western forces use all means to achieve goals. Taking advantage of the shortage of products, these figures decided to make the Syrian children hostage to the interests of those who themselves are actively sponsoring the white-eyed scenario, which was more than once the scenario.
This is the reason for raising the issue in the UN Security Council. "White helmets" it is high time to recognize a terrorist organization or accomplices of terrorists.
Comments from our readers:
Spartanez300
The worst thing is that everyone was up to the lantern, that it was another production, and that if the United States said that chimataka was, then it was, and no evidence was needed.
Vita vko
In fact, the United States is the only country that has not yet fulfilled its obligation to destroy chemical weapons. A country that, together with Britain, is engaged not only in its development, which follows from the availability of a patent, but transfers these technologies to terrorists in Syria. Therefore, it is completely incomprehensible why Russia has to constantly make excuses? Maybe it's time to stop the stupid practice of Gorbachev's trust in the West? The arrogance and naivety of the Russian special services, who are obsessed with the fight against terrorists, sometimes just leads to despair. Now Russia is surrounded not only by NATO bases, but also by the US biological laboratories, which are also in "friendly" countries (Kazakhstan). Waiting for epidemics? And then again in the UN Security Council we will argue that Russia, like Syria, did not use biological weapons against its people and "allies"?
freddyk
Really, what evidence? In the jungle, strong do not need proof, and America lives according to the laws of the jungle. International law is invented for the rest. America behaves like a gopnik, who understands only force, the laws are not written to him.
And we are now watching our answer on all TV channels.
And we are now watching our answer on all TV channels.
Relations between Russia and Israel have become "fragile"
The Israeli Air Force continued to attack the Syrian Arab Republic. Al-Sheyrat airbase in the province of Homs was attacked again. This is reported by the Lebanese information resource AMN, with reference to its own sources. The report says that the air defense intercepted several missiles fired by Israeli aircraft. This is about intercepting 6 missiles.
At the Pentagon, journalists' requests were answered that this time the United States had nothing to do with the rocket attack on Syria.
Israeli officials do not comment on the reports of the Lebanese information portal.
And one more "Israeli" news.
The prospect of Russia supplying Damascus with modern air defense systems has greatly alarmed Israel, even more than the United States, writes the American edition of Bloomberg. The article says that Israeli analysts and former military consider the only option for Israel’s response to delivering Russian C-300 to Syria “an immediate attempt to destroy them”.
According to the author of the article, this would destroy the fragile relations between Israel and Russia, which kept the channels of communication open, despite the support of opposing sides in Syria.
Israel attacked objects in Syria again
Bloomberg: Israel will destroy all delivered to Damascus C-300
Bloomberg: Israel will destroy all delivered to Damascus C-300
Earlier, the Chief of the Main Operations Directorate of the General Staff of the Armed Forces of Russia, Colonel-General Sergei Rudskoy, said that Russia could return to considering the issue of supplying C-300 air defense systems to Syria and other countries.
As for the rocket attacks on Syria and interceptions of missiles, on the eve of the briefing, the representative of the Russian Defense Ministry Igor Konashenkov noted that in Syria, Pantsir systems were used to intercept missiles launched during the US-Anglo-French aggression.
Comments from our readers:
hrych
The time has come to destroy targets in the sky over Lebanon, such a technique in the form of a C-300 will be presented, and what is the difference, say with C-200, you probably know yourself, like the military leadership of Israel. I will tell you, of course: this is the defeat of over-the-horizon targets (not all C-300 modifications). An air defense missile with an advanced semi-active and active gos gains height, increasing the radio horizon and itself finds and hits a sneaking target from above, whether it be Tomahawk or a fighter-bomber, including stealth, because in the upper hemisphere the EPR is not strong to reduce. The target coordinates are given by external target designation, because the complex does not have a trans-horizon radar (which is very cumbersome). The difference in the work of the old lamp complexes and the current ones is not great, the principle has not changed, of course, the reaction time and other quantitative indicators change. Fundamentally new in advanced C-300 and standard C-400 - it is the use of new over-the-horizon rocket missiles. This is a quality indicator ...
a housewife
Apparently, the Syrians decided to learn from NATO how to give all the information. There were missiles, but they were eliminated. And now you prove something there!
Topotun
The main thing is that Syria’s air bases are intact and continue to fight, but how do you assess the means of Syria’s air defense, your own business. Proving anything is nothing. It’s like chimatacs: they were, but nobody found their traces ...
konstantin68
In fairness, I want to note that the demonstration of debris from the "axes" would be very desirable. And all interested parties understand this. It is strange that there is still no photo. A fisherman doesn’t have to tell a lot about how much he caught “just like that” and “oh-oh from takennyh” yesterday, just throw a photo in “VK”. Unclear.
This is not a "Newbie." And it is not Russian
The research center in Switzerland, which analyzed the OPCW samples from the scene of the Salisbury incident, concluded that the substance BZ, which was in service with the United States and Britain, was used in Skripale poisoning, but was not done in the Russian Federation and the USSR, said Russian Foreign Minister Sergey Lavrov.
Later, the deputy director of the Institute of Strategic Studies and Forecasts of PFUR Nikita Danyuk explained why the Swiss laboratory, whose conclusions were referred to by Sergey Lavrov, did not comment on his words about BZ.
According to him, "at the moment, institutions that are responsible for regional and global security, including the OPCW, are subject to very serious pressure from external forces." Danyuk also believes that in the future at the official level it will be declared that Russia is not involved in the "Skripal case".
Skripale poisoned by the British agents. Lavrov voiced the conclusions of the Swiss Center
Why did the Swiss chemists "could not comment" the statement of Lavrov? The expert explained
Why did the Swiss chemists "could not comment" the statement of Lavrov? The expert explained
The assumption of the non-participation of Russia, voiced by any of the political figures of the West "at the official level", seems to us questionable. Is it possible that after twenty years some retired laboratory assistant or a retired special service agent who has drunk in a bar will share something of this sort. But that will not be the "official" position of Britain, or at least Switzerland.
And the one who will win the Cold War or will be able to stop it will be right. But in the fraternity and friendship of nations, more precisely, of states, in our time it is completely hard to believe.
Comments from our readers:
Ross xnumx
Why the Swiss could not comment on the statement of Sergei Lavrov? It remains to say to him only one thing: “Teach the Russian language, it will come in handy.”
sounddoc
Swiss chemists will not comment, British scientists will comment. Or American warriors. Or European mongrel ...
Sewer krainiy
According to Euronews, it was reported that the laboratory in Spitz confirmed the use of the Novice chemical substance in Salisbury. So who dances, he orders the music ... How many people thought at “VO”.
Cuba without Castro
Important information came from Freedom Island: the head of state Raul Castro left his post due to deteriorating health. The National Assembly (the highest legislative body in Cuba) elected Miguel Dias-Kanel to the posts of the State Council and the Council of Ministers (both held Raul Castro).
It is unlikely that a change of leader can be considered a sensation, since 86-year-old Raul Castro himself raised the issue of the country's new leader.
The new head of the State Council of Cuba and the Council of Ministers 57 years. He was the only candidate for these posts. Voting in the National Assembly was held in secret. The result is known: the candidacy of Miguel Diaz-Kanel was supported by an 603 deputy. The total number of voters - 605 people.
Will the era change with the leader? So far, only one thing is known: the newly elected head of the State Council of Cuba noted that he will continue to follow the political course that Cuba has been following these years. This is a course on social equality and improving the welfare of citizens.
Comments from our readers:
APASUS
Oh, and I have doubts! I heard already on the site that the American soft power is winning in Cuba on the sly. Now there is a cult of all American, as we have before, remember, jeans, chewing gum, Coca-Cola. But it was from this that everything began with us.
K.A.S.
Don't you want to live like in Cuba? You see, people want to live well! So you and I, for example, live well, have access to all sorts of good and interesting things, we can go on holiday abroad, we can buy things. Why shouldn't Cubans want this?
A friend recently returned from Cuba (tour). Poverty and the poor! I tried the Cuban rum and cigar!
A friend recently returned from Cuba (tour). Poverty and the poor! I tried the Cuban rum and cigar!
seti
Nothing much will change. Since the power is still the same comrades. We need fresh faces with a new look at world changes - this is not.
zombirusrev
They somehow sort out without us. We here in 90-x themselves completely climbed into the dummy, now how to wash?
Alber
We already have a sad experience with the choice of "fresh faces with a new look" and new thinking ... After such a fresh face, the great country of the USSR has come to an end.
Information