When striking Syria, the US experienced the latest missiles

255
After the American attacks on Syria, the Western media reported that during the bombing of Damascus, the first combat use of American high-precision air-to-surface cruise missiles AGM-158 JASSM took place, according to Western media.

A photograph of the missiles on supersonic bombers B-1B, allegedly taking part in the attack on Syria, publishes The Drive portal.



When striking Syria, the US experienced the latest missiles


There is no official confirmation of the use of these missiles, the media refer to anonymous "sources" close to the operation. The result of the use of missiles is also unknown.

Previously, analysts have noted that the use of this weapons will allow the Americans to avoid accidental defeat of Russian objects. In addition, high-precision missiles can strike from outside the Syrian airspace. A feature of these missiles is reduced radar visibility. Each rocket costs several hundred thousand dollars and is intended for the destruction of especially important and protected targets.
  • https://twitter.com/Aviation_Intel
Our news channels

Subscribe and stay up to date with the latest news and the most important events of the day.

255 comments
Information
Dear reader, to leave comments on the publication, you must sign in.
  1. +10
    April 14 2018 13: 49
    And were these superfood missiles?
    1. +18
      April 14 2018 13: 52
      Quote: ALEXX.
      And were these superfood missiles?

      They said they were. The rocket is not bad. The point is that it is relatively new ..., the last modification there is a range of 1300 km (the previous modification beat a third closer), launch without entering the air defense zone ... Well, all missiles are modernized everywhere, in fact after modernization, they become new ...
      1. +43
        April 14 2018 14: 02
        And it turns out that they were shot down by the "overgrown moss" of the Soviet SAM, which no one took into account? Then this is American slag, not a super rocket.
        1. +40
          April 14 2018 14: 07
          1) not the fact that these missiles were shot down.
          2) the shell and beech-m2 with moss did not have time to overgrow.
          1. +12
            April 14 2018 14: 40
            if they worked with a coefficient of 0,7 - then write them off to the scrap.
            1. +14
              April 14 2018 15: 37
              But how can you say the coefficient without knowing the number of missiles launched? And the second 0.7 is a very good coefficient that takes into account the launch of 2 missiles for 1 missile to shoot down! American missiles have a coefficient lower than this and that they are happy shouting that it is the best!
            2. +1
              April 15 2018 01: 42
              Quote: Kent0001
              if they worked with a coefficient of 0,7 - then write them off to the scrap.

              Don’t, Emelya. How many were destroyed by Buki 2M, how many others? 0,7 = this is an average. Get the info about the work only BUK-2M, and then tweet.
              1. +2
                April 15 2018 13: 20
                The S-125 also works well, but the Americans were unlucky to see the work of the S-400.
          2. +16
            April 14 2018 15: 57
            Not the fact that missiles were shot down at all ...
            You can declare anything (after using frames of a computer game as evidence of faith in our MO’s word, there were 71 missiles shot down - show the debris of exactly 71 missiles, if there are none, then there are no missiles shot down.
            In fact, not the newest planes attacked Syria with impunity, and we tightened our tail and shouted that it didn’t hurt us ... Well, now wait for the arrival of such missiles every minute, Trump will no longer warn in two days ...
            1. +16
              April 14 2018 16: 30
              Of course not a fact, not a fact, and the fact that the United States generally fired so many rockets. In general, everything is not a fact, then on what basis do you conclude that Syria was attacked with impunity? So that all Trump are afraid?
            2. +5
              April 14 2018 16: 48
              Are you confused with the Pentagon? It was they who launched a fake with a computer game
              1. +5
                April 14 2018 17: 57
                Quote: Usher
                Are you confused with the Pentagon? It was they who launched a fake with a computer game

                about how, the Pentagon has already launched a fake, yeah, selective, what kind of memory do some citizens have wassat

                1. +3
                  April 14 2018 20: 59
                  What about the fact that my favorite country, when counting about the bombing of the igles, showed our pictures? with Cyrillic instead of Latin?
                  1. +1
                    April 14 2018 21: 03
                    too lazy to search but if you ask me to find) briefing
                    1. 0
                      April 14 2018 21: 34
                      Quote: noct
                      too lazy to search but if you ask me to find) briefing

                      no, no need to look, still overdo it, your sofa’s defenses will suffer, well, how can I ask for this ... lol
            3. +11
              April 14 2018 17: 55
              Syrian Observatory for Human Rights, based in the glorious city of London, the main mouthpiece of the "green" aka moderate terrorists
              He stated that according to their data they shot down more than 65 missiles
              The least interested source in exalting the AAA anti-aircraft defense and lowering the capabilities of the USA and NATO simply does not exist in nature
              So look, 71 missile was shot down

              http://www.syriahr.com/en/?p=89324
              1. 0
                April 14 2018 21: 28
                maybe they are asking for more ...
            4. 0
              April 14 2018 23: 11
              Quote: Ratmir_Ryazan
              Not the fact that missiles were shot down at all ...

              I think the facts will be much later. When rocket fragments are collected, then we will find out, maybe ... In any case, we must wait.
            5. 0
              April 15 2018 13: 27
              Quote: Ratmir_Ryazan
              ... In fact, not the newest planes attacked Syria with impunity, and we curled our tail while screaming that it doesn’t hurt us ...

              In fact, you are a sofa troll that has nothing to do with the army. Hollower and bullshit, the fact that the forum drew the "captain" for you is a huge mistake. You can hang maximum corporal.
              And in Syria, attacking with their massive modern weapons, and hoping to get a limited response from Russia, the United States achieved absolutely nothing, and even disgraced, the second launch, and the second time, no losses, most of the missiles were destroyed by old Soviet missiles, and the most advanced the world of Russian air defense has not yet been disclosed. Again, when you try to attack Russia, it is completely unknown in the context of a massive Russian response. Again there will be no third world war.
              1. 0
                April 15 2018 13: 35
                Quote: Bratkov Oleg
                most of the missiles were destroyed by old Soviet missiles,

                And how can one be convinced of this?
                1. 0
                  April 16 2018 23: 08
                  Well, “Shell” and “Buk” turned out to have the highest rate of collapse.
                  Received official data from the Ministry of Defense of Russia.
                  Buy Russian weapons!
                  1. 0
                    April 17 2018 07: 56
                    Quote: Bratkov Oleg
                    Well, “Shell” and “Buk” turned out to have the highest rate of collapse.
                    Received official data from the Ministry of Defense of Russia.
                    Buy Russian weapons!

                    "Believe." Russian weapons advanced very much after Saddam and Yugoslavia. good Congratulations.
            6. 0
              April 19 2018 23: 25
              I completely agree with you, but alas, talking about this is useless. Most komenty from the category of "what Americans are stupid." I won’t believe that modern cruise missiles were shot down by the USSR-s technology developed in the 60s. And false information about the number of shot down missiles is thrown intentionally in Syria to raise the spirits of the military, in Russia to further brainwash “cheers to patriots” - although much further. They did the same thing during the Second World War, talked about non-existent victories and came up with non-existent heroes, this is already a proven fact.
          3. +4
            April 14 2018 16: 37
            They said that B-1 bombers went into the eastern part of Syria and were bombarded with new GBU-39 gliding bombs, if there were cruise missiles, they would be hit from a long distance.
            1. 0
              April 14 2018 19: 37
              He bombed with AGM 158 missiles.
            2. +1
              April 14 2018 21: 20
              I also tend to this option ... GBU-39 Therefore, they did not intercept ...
              1. +2
                April 15 2018 08: 01
                Russian Defense Ministry said that GBU-38 were used. They have a planning distance from the discharge point of 30 km. In any case, it is necessary to enter the coverage area of ​​both S-125 and S-200.
              2. 0
                April 15 2018 14: 33
                GBU-39 here - they have nothing to do with strategic bombers.
                1. 0
                  April 15 2018 14: 53
                  Vadim237

                  I wonder what is your erroneous opinion based on?
        2. +12
          April 14 2018 14: 30
          One thing is clear - there will be more people willing to buy Russian-made air defense systems!
          1. +5
            April 14 2018 15: 59
            Russian air defense did not show themselves, if they shot down even one plane, it would be, a reason to be glad, and so what did they show ?! Downed rockets ?! And whoever confirms that they shot down more than 70 out of 100, the Americans scream out that everyone was struck successfully ...
            1. +8
              April 14 2018 16: 34
              It was clearly stated that the missiles were not included in the coverage area of ​​the Russian air defense systems, for which this nagging. Are you sure that in the cabins of the Syrian air defense systems sat only the Syrian calculations?
            2. +4
              April 14 2018 17: 38
              With such a missile attack, there are no victims.
            3. +2
              April 14 2018 21: 05
              is it really so ?: does Syria have NATO air defense? they do not have ancient systems of Soviet production. 71 out of 103 is normal for dinosaurs.
            4. +3
              April 14 2018 21: 52
              And they took you and then laid out who shot where and where! And the fact that the Americans shout is a deliberate lie, sarin, soman, like other gases, do not detonate and retain their properties for a very long time on the ground, which means that if a rocket gets into such a warehouse, the infection strip would creep-in accordance with the wind rose, destroying everything in its path even very democratic ISIS rebels!
              1. 0
                April 15 2018 13: 31
                Zarin disintegrates in 3 hours. But it is absorbed in rubber parts, in car tires, and they will be dangerous for a longer time.
            5. +2
              April 14 2018 23: 34
              It’s not how much they shot down. The main thing is to complete the task or not. 3 goals were assigned. They are destroyed. The outfit of weapons of destruction shows that the United States and its allies do not have a shortage of precision weapons, which they allude to. This means that they simply fill up any missile defense system with missiles. Please note, the Allies did not wait for the arrival of the reinforced AUG-iron and 8 ships. What if? Can you imagine the power of a volley?
              1. +1
                April 15 2018 13: 33
                AUG is a collection of troughs, drowned once and twice. that is why they were all taken away, because if they had a conflict with Russia they would have sunk everyone.
                Americans are excellent liars, and indeed all Anglo-Saxons in general, their main thing is Ponte. They still dream that they were on the moon, although the first time they flew into space only in 1971, thanks to the Soviet technology transferred to them.
        3. Don
          +20
          April 14 2018 14: 32
          Quote: Kent0001
          And it turns out that they were shot down by the "overgrown moss" of the Soviet SAM, which no one took into account? Then this is American slag, not a super rocket.

          Of course, slag, and their aircraft carriers are troughs, and the planes are irons, or it’s our business, which has no analogues in the world of weapons fellow
          1. +12
            April 14 2018 14: 33
            Taki in fact yes judging by the result
            1. Don
              +10
              April 14 2018 14: 36
              Quote: yaros
              Taki in fact yes judging by the result

              And were you definitely interested in the results or trying to find evidence for your opinion? The Iranians here give data that 120 was shot down from 13 missiles. Or are they also ranked by the State Department?
              1. +16
                April 14 2018 14: 42
                And where then super damage from 100 axes? And if there is no damage from getting 90 axes, then slag in the cube.
                1. +2
                  April 14 2018 16: 49
                  Damage - loss of face.
                  1. +1
                    April 14 2018 20: 32
                    So you have not had it for a long time, some faces on avatars
                    1. +1
                      April 15 2018 00: 11
                      And it seems that you didn’t have it. There is nothing to lose, nothing to regret.
              2. +10
                April 14 2018 15: 08
                Well, to refute the words of the Russian Defense Ministry is simple. I think the Israeli and US military need to provide satellite images of the "bombed" Syria airfields. request Bye silence lol They must be digesting what went wrong wassat
                1. +3
                  April 14 2018 15: 13
                  Quote: Traveler
                  Well, to refute the words of the Russian Ministry of Defense is simply

                  only who will believe them?



                  Quote: Traveler
                  . I think the military of Israel and the United States need to provide satellite images of the "bombed" Syria airfields

                  a couple of days
                  Quote: Traveler
                  Bye silence

                  how much time has passed ?
                  They at least publish.
                  MO - nothing at all.
                  1. The comment was deleted.
                    1. 0
                      April 14 2018 19: 13
                      Well, what has not been done so far! Scat!
                      1. 0
                        April 15 2018 00: 17
                        Beat the drum louder. I do not hear you.
                  2. +4
                    April 14 2018 23: 48
                    I'm starting to quietly hate this kipod. And you?
                    1. +3
                      April 15 2018 00: 02
                      Quote: sabakina
                      I'm starting to quietly hate this kipod. And you?

                      Muddy frame! I already posted a "conversation" to him, but the "conversation" disappeared from the page ...
              3. The comment was deleted.
              4. The comment was deleted.
              5. +3
                April 14 2018 21: 59
                You or not, the operation doesn’t have military significance, there are no OMs in nature in Syria, 6 people were injured, 6 -Karl, OMs are not destroyed by a simple explosion, General from the Committee of Chiefs Headquarters P.R.I.D.U. R.O.K!
              6. 0
                April 15 2018 13: 35
                This is Iran producing the S-300, S400 ... Wow, I didn’t know, you opened your eyes directly to everyone.
                Quote: Donskoy
                The Iranians here give data that 120 out of 13 missiles were shot down. Or are they also ranked as the State Department?
          2. +10
            April 14 2018 14: 38
            There was no talk besides rockets for other weapons. If rockets are shot down, then slag is a super smart staff weapon. A carrier can also be drowned in several ways. Do not distort.
          3. +7
            April 14 2018 14: 52
            Quote: Donskoy
            whether our unparalleled weapons

            estessssna! ...
            their miserable smart missiles as soon as they approached our area of ​​responsibility, they were all frightened and immediately fell to the earth ...
            almost killed themselves Yes
            it’s scary to imagine what would happen if our air defense worked! belay
            1. +2
              April 14 2018 19: 15
              However, for all your worship of their weapons, give the answer: why didn’t they fly into the area of ​​our air defense? Why warned in advance? The truth is somewhere in between ...
              1. +3
                April 14 2018 19: 27
                Quote: konstantin68
                However, for all your worship of their weapons,

                take it sweet ... wassat
                is the word sarcasm known?
                or is it difficult to read what I usually write about? request
                and no need to invent for others and especially speak for them Yes
              2. +3
                April 14 2018 23: 51
                Quote: konstantin68
                The truth is somewhere in between ...

          4. +5
            April 14 2018 15: 58
            Only we are afraid to use it
        4. +9
          April 14 2018 14: 37
          "they were shot down" overgrown with moss "Soviet SAM"
          Who said that?))) Of course, those who make a good face with a bad game. Watch channels other than Vesti. There you will see Syrian objects shattered into slivers
          1. +14
            April 14 2018 14: 44
            Are you talking about adobe sheds and abandoned in the desert?
            1. +3
              April 14 2018 19: 18
              No, the institute was shown to him destroyed by 76 axes.
          2. +12
            April 14 2018 14: 54
            Quote: sefevi
            Who said that?))) Of course, those who make a good face with a bad game. Watch channels other than Vesti. There you will see Syrian objects shattered into slivers

            You are probably happy to hear about the failure of the Russian Federation! Do not put on pants, or maybe you don’t wear them?
            1. +1
              April 15 2018 13: 39
              Quote: astronom1973n
              You are probably happy to hear about the failure of the Russian Federation! Do not put on pants, or maybe you don’t wear them?

              THIS WHERE FAILURE OF RUSSIA ????
              2/3 of the missiles were shot down, the old Russian air defense, and the TTX of the new American could not be revealed, they only disgraced themselves and still do not know what to expect from Russian air defense in an attack on Russia. But the whole world saw how the old export weapons of Russia work, and the new export will work even better, even with export restrictions. And what to expect from the best air defense, from Russian, is still a surprise.
              1. +2
                April 15 2018 13: 46
                Quote: Bratkov Oleg
                new
                Quote: astronom1973n
                You are probably happy to hear about the failure of the Russian Federation! Do not put on pants, or maybe you don’t wear them?
                THIS WHERE FAILURE OF RUSSIA ????
                2/3 of the missiles were shot down, the old Russian air defense, and the TTX of the new American could not be revealed, they only disgraced themselves and still do not know what to expect from Russian air defense in an attack on Russia. But the whole world saw how the old export weapons of Russia work, and the new export will work even better, even with export restrictions. And what to expect from the best air defense, from Russian, is still a surprise.

                Olezhek, read the text with your head, to whom and what I answered. And the meaning of the written. Be healthy.
        5. +3
          April 14 2018 14: 50
          Quote: Kent0001
          And it turns out that they were shot down by the "overgrown moss" of the Soviet SAM, which no one took into account? Then this is American slag, not a super rocket.

          Who said they were shot down?
          1. +3
            April 14 2018 15: 03
            Super rockets will not be hit on barns in the desert. and over the airfields all that attacked them was shot down. Something like this.
        6. +1
          April 14 2018 18: 27
          Quote: Kent0001
          And it turns out that they were shot down by the "overgrown moss" of the Soviet SAM, which no one took into account? Then this is American slag, not a super rocket.

          The result of the shelling of Syria’s air defense absorbed 70% of the missiles with the old TOP, BUK systems of the first series. And this is a huge reputational damage to the exclusivity of mattress weapons.
          Quote: just explo
          the shell and beech-m2 did not have time to overgrow with moss.

          As far as I know, the Syrians have no shells yet. But I’m sure that they will appear soon.
          1. 0
            April 17 2018 19: 48
            Or maybe the Americans for the first time stupidly highlighted the main locations of the Syrian air defense?
            After the verification, they can make adjustments and extinguish all air defense with the second wave, the third wave will be stupidly bombing, they will not touch ours, but Assad’s warehouses, armaments, energy centers, hospitals will cover it all. Now Trump will bargain with GDP, which is the question. No planes will still be the 2nd and 3rd wave, the Pentagon will squeeze Trump, and we will smother for the wrong forces in that region and supplies to wage even a local war.
        7. 0
          April 15 2018 15: 07
          What are you all as small children? Do you have any idea who actually shot down most of their missiles? It's just that neither the "partners" nor the Russians are interested in declaring this. But for Russia, this is an invaluable combat experience in repelling a massive airstrike. And it is quite possible that there will soon be a continuation, and perhaps more seriously. In the meantime, it is working on bugs. But Trump is really an agent of the Kremlin - who else would help him like that smile
      2. +7
        April 14 2018 14: 07
        If a fight is inevitable, it is necessary to beat first - Vladimir Putin, a fight can still be avoided feel request
        1. +6
          April 14 2018 14: 21
          Quote: Karakurt
          If a fight is inevitable, it is necessary to beat first - Vladimir Putin, a fight can still be avoided

          Do not avoid, but stitch. Only if I don’t know the point.
          1. +2
            April 14 2018 14: 33
            Quote: Pirogov
            Quote: Karakurt
            If a fight is inevitable, it is necessary to beat first - Vladimir Putin, a fight can still be avoided

            Do not avoid, but stitch. Only if I don’t know the point.

            I agree with you this is a clearer definition, but it makes sense to defer anyway it will be necessary to beat and no matter the first or not
          2. 0
            April 14 2018 20: 35
            Well then it’s not yet completely ready
          3. +2
            April 14 2018 21: 10
            as if the announced "daggers" and so on still need to be riveted in the required quantity. before you need to pull the port
      3. 0
        April 14 2018 21: 35
        1300 you waved it? up to 1000 km maximum!
    2. +26
      April 14 2018 13: 53
      And is it important? It is important that our "generals" beat their heels in the chest for the umpteenth time, and at that time the star-striped democrats wipe their feet on them.
      1. +23
        April 14 2018 14: 09
        Quote: Black_Jacket
        And is it important? It is important that our "generals" beat their heels in the chest for the umpteenth time, and at that time the star-striped democrats wipe their feet on them.

        Caved in under the striped bosses? Take the carrot.
        1. +19
          April 14 2018 14: 28
          Armor-piercing logic. It was not I who caved in, but our politicians from expensive Italian jackets, whose children live there, study there, spending money there too.
          And you can stick a carrot for yourself .... well, you’ll figure it out yourself.
          1. +7
            April 14 2018 17: 01
            Quote: Black_Jacket
            Armor-piercing logic. It was not I who caved in, but our politicians from expensive Italian jackets, whose children live there, study there, spending money there too ...

            Well, it’s a direct ideological character from Navalny’s headquarters. Have you started shooting the second film about corruption?
            1. +7
              April 14 2018 17: 50
              When there is one gyrus in the head, then the owner of such a head always has a black and white world. There are no other colors.
              Or you write from the “successes” of the Russian authorities, and if not, then you are a traitor from Navalny’s headquarters, a pro-American liberal from the fifth column.
              1. +9
                April 14 2018 19: 22
                Quote: Black_Jacket
                When there is one gyrus in the head, then the owner of such a head always has a black and white world. There are no other colors.

                I have at least two brains. One - statutory, remained from the time of my military service. The second is a commercial furrow, left over from baryzny affairs, with which I am still engaged.
                Quote: Black_Jacket
                Or you write from the “successes” of the Russian authorities, and if not, then you are a traitor from Navalny’s headquarters, a pro-American liberal from the fifth column.

                It seems I said I’m bending about you in vain. Sorry, confused. hi But you do not go bad. There is nothing to breed a panic. Nothing is missing. Putin neither Syria nor the Donbass leaked. We will still fight, but later. The war is not going anywhere from us. Just start the war, it is not necessary according to Trump’s plan (the USA started, we answered, because we have nowhere to go?), But when it’s better and more convenient for us. We managed to avoid the Western plan of the war now - great. So there’s still time to prepare. And the country is preparing, I know for sure. We take any period of time in recent years, as they began to emerge from the shadows - we are becoming stronger than before. How many screamers there were in 2014, in 2015, in 2016, in 2017, offering enthusiastic "to strike at the amers, so it would be disastrous!" But then we still did not have Daggers on combat duty and the Perimeter was unfinished. Yes, much has not happened! And now everything is not yet completed.
                I know that I am not the General Staff of the RF Armed Forces. I don’t know much. The most important decisions, like hitting or not hitting the US destroyer, need to be made not on the basis of emotions, sitting on the couch without full knowledge of the situation, but after receiving and analyzing three cars of information from different sources. There is such information in the General Staff, for that he and the General Staff. I do not have. I proceed from the fact that in my country the General Staff is headed by people who are smart and devoted to their homeland. If we proceed from the fact that a gang of traitors has sat down at the helm, then it’s easier to go to the bathroom and shoot yourself.
                1. 0
                  April 14 2018 21: 13
                  Nicholas. without words. there is simply nothing to add plus
                2. +1
                  April 14 2018 23: 49
                  Are you sure that smart and loyal people are sitting in the General Staff. Rutsky’s words are almost literally “If you strike Damascus, this will be the last thing you do.” Where are the actions !!!!. It's time to answer for your words with Putin and Rutsky and Gerasimov. This is a blow not only to Syria, but also to Russia. There is a war against us. Only a significant part of people prefer not to notice it. And there will be no answer as long as the children of laurel, Putin and other pseudo-elites live in the United States and Europe and more than 1 trillion. dollars invested in the US economy. So we’re getting ready for a strike against Khmeimim and Tartus. The USA always brings what it has started to its logical conclusion.
        2. +6
          April 14 2018 14: 39
          Listen, colleagues. For some reason, I am inclined to the idea that the mattresses are somehow correct. They are right that Bashar Hafez al-Assad must leave.
          Does he even somehow control the situation? He never says anything anywhere. He, the legal president of the country of a UN member, flies incognito to Moscow with a suitcase and returns with a suitcase.
          He does not have a country, but a walk-field. Everyone who is not lazy in the country is running around with guns, blowing up, poisoning them with gas, Yankees bombing, Russians moving their interests. Why should Maria Zakharova explain to him to the World that there are no gas attacks, that the Americans in white helmets lie.
          Here, Comrade Eun said a couple of affectionate Trump, he was about to bomb Korea.
          And this one is silent. What is silent?
          1. +8
            April 14 2018 15: 40
            he is an optometrist, not an otolaryngologist
            or maybe his performances just don’t show you
            because you don’t know Arabic lol
            1. 0
              April 14 2018 15: 54
              Quote: YELLOWSTONE
              he is an optometrist, not an otolaryngologist

              Do not express yourself Billy. (with)
              Why not show it?
              At all negotiations and conferences, high representatives of Iran, Russia and Turkey are trying to solve the problem of a peaceful settlement in Syria. The United States, for its part, wants to solve this Syrian crisis.
              Where is Assad? What summits did he attend? What does he even offer? Why they don’t show it on TV. The Russian media would certainly have shown his performances.
              The Ministry of Defense of the Russian Federation considers for him the shot down missiles and counts the victims.
              He is being bombed, but he is silent as it should not today.
              Erdogan would have Washington dismantled bricks in such a situation (well, of course)
              1. +5
                April 14 2018 16: 09
                maybe he needs to get an account on twitter, like all decent people?
                or do you like how the representative of the Russian foreign ministry re-read the whole nonsense of the British press aloud to the tired audience?
                1. +1
                  April 14 2018 16: 34
                  You can tweet, you can in the newspaper True account. The main result. To hear him.
                  Or do you think that when the capital is bombed, the president should be silent?
                  I don't know Arabic, that's for sure. And comrade Trump does not know Korean (for some reason it seems to me), but he perfectly understood what Eun told him.
                  1. 0
                    April 14 2018 21: 26
                    it’s not the first time they have been bombed, did Stalin report to the Pravda newspaper for every raid on Moscow?
                    he has good translators from Chinese
          2. +6
            April 14 2018 16: 49
            Quote: kit88
            Listen, colleagues. For some reason, I am inclined to the idea that the mattresses are somehow correct.
            Interesting, interesting - in something, what is it?
            Quote: kit88
            They are right that Bashar Hafez al-Assad must leave.

            Of course they are right, but it's their truth - they sleep and see that Assad is not. Milosevic, Saddam Hussein, Gaddafi is gone. They, and not only them, have interest in this regard. Assad and Russia to do with it?
            Quote: kit88
            ... Russians are moving their interests.
            these are your words.
            Quote: kit88
            He does not have a country, but a walk-field. All and sundry around the country with machine guns run, blow up, poison gas, Yankees bomb ...
            Not someone is not lazy, but to whom the sponsors paid and whom they armed. Which country has no nuclear weapons, it is not immune from such a fate. If you have the resources or you are developing dynamically, be sure that American democracy with humanitarian bombing of satellites will knock on your door. The fighters for Assad’s head promise $ 25 million, whose money is clear?
            Quote: kit88
            Here comrade Eun said a couple of affectionate Trump, he was about to bomb Korea

            You have a Russian flag, but think like a European "elite", there, even between a woman and a man, they no longer see the difference. Comrade Eun has nuclear weapons! And the point here is not that "Trump has turned around," but that Koreans understand that you cannot make concessions and they have a stern argument.
            Quote: kit88
            He never says anything anywhere ..... Why should Maria Zakharova explain to him to the World that there are no gas attacks, that the Americans in white helmets are lying .... And this one is silent. What is silent?

            What Zakharova says is her work. The president should not stoop to explain the platitudes, and to whom should he explain to whom should he make his people or Europe laugh? He does the job - leads the defense of the country, denials of non-involvement in the chemical. blows are made, the evidence base is being collected. And what is there to clarify to whom? In 2000, 97,29% of voters voted for Bashar al-Assad. The whole West was delighted with him. In 2007 in alternative elections, 88,7% voted for him - the West is tender. But Assad remembers how the friendship with the Americans ended in Yugoslavia, Iraq, Libya ... therefore, in the gas issue, in particular, he decided to be friends with Russia and Iran, rejecting the proposals of the USA and Qatar, and in 2011 sharply became a fiend of hell devouring babies. And to whom, what he must explain, everything is very clear here, that explaining to anyone is pointless, with the exception of:
            Quote: kit88
            ... incognito flies to Moscow with a suitcase and also returns with a suitcase.
            try to enlist the support of the beneficiaries, especially since there is a legal basis for military assistance. And what does he do wrong to leave? You yourself are not accidentally on a salary from the State Department?
            1. 0
              April 14 2018 17: 16
              Quote: V. Salama
              The president should not stoop to clarify platitudes

              Oh how! Tell me, dear colleague, who is so in your words, "dropped":

              July 3, 1941
              Comrades! Citizens! Brothers and sisters! Fighters of our army and navy! I appeal to you, my friends! ...


              Okay.
              And Eun would have found something to say even in such a situation. And he would not bend or be silent.
              I think so!
              1. +3
                April 14 2018 17: 45
                Quote: kit88

                July 3, 1941
                Comrades! Citizens! Brothers and sisters! Fighters of our army and navy! I appeal to you, my friends !.

                Don't you see the difference between the excuses for the slanderers and the call to fight? Of course it is sad.
                Quote: kit88
                And Eun would have found something to say even in such a situation.
                Why not say it? Eun was already born in an outcast country in which a harsh war took place. Now there is no war, it’s hot, but in the information war you can talk, if it makes sense, for example, respond to a threat with a threat. By the way, Eun did not go down to the rebuttal of defamation either. Remember how much his uncle used to say to him from a heavy machine gun he shot, one, the other ... I don’t remember everyone - silence. Then everyone turned out to be alive. Himself had to face a strange logic, in Russia in our country - "if you make excuses, it means you are to blame." I could not comprehend for a long time.
                Quote: kit88
                And he would not bend or be silent.

                Yes, and Assad does not bend, yes, in general, and is not silent - where necessary, what is needed, who needs.
                Quote: kit88
                I think so!
                It is your full right to have an opinion and submit it for discussion. But I have the right to understand why you think so, and if your arguments simply did not convince me, I would not have reacted. I believe that your ideas about the situation contradict our common interests and I would like to understand the reason - maybe I misunderstood something here?
                1. 0
                  April 14 2018 18: 40
                  It seems to me that the Syrian leader should lead the struggle of his people against the invaders. And the whole world should see this leader and respect. He may not have an atomic bomb, but he has a character. (About how pathetically wrote)
                  And in order to solve any problem it is necessary speak with an opponent. And I see that Russia, Iran, Turkey speak for Syria, but not Syria itself.
                  Well, let him not be a public person and not like any correspondents. But you need to communicate with other world leaders. Problems must be solved.
                  And now, no longer rumors need to be refuted. Real bombs are falling on Damascus, so a comparison with I.V. Stalin - it is quite appropriate.
                  1. +5
                    April 14 2018 20: 00
                    He leads this fight against the invaders, and their whole coalition. On his own, he will not cope. And the whole world sees and respects this, even enemies. And the enemy is one with which it is impossible to agree, or it is not the enemy, but, for example, a neighbor in the country. During the war, they do not agree, but fight until the enemy inflicts unacceptable damage - when the enemy loses his ability or desire to continue resistance (aggression). Even Stalin would not agree with the aggressor when he retreated or when he won. They saw no reason to enter into negotiations either Saddam or Gaddafi, and they did not have time for this. Russia in Syria does not lead the struggle of the Syrian people against the invaders, it acts strictly within the framework of the agreements. Since Russia is not at war with the United States, Great Britain, or France, that is, officially they are not our enemies and, logically, we can talk to them and, we say, because Russia in Syria, in the real sense, is opposing the expansion of the geopolitical enemy, that is, it defends its national interests, but has not yet fought against this adversary. When you need to shoot - do not talk, you need to shoot. It was necessary to think and talk earlier. Therefore, on a par with Russia, Iran and Turkey are doing the same thing - they are trying to reach out to reason, on the contrary, too, there are a lot of arguments, slanderous of course, in order to justify unjust aggression in front of their peoples. Well, with the exception of Israel, he does not slander, and he does his job with a quiet glanders - for their people, everything is registered in Kabbalah. How to communicate Assad with world leaders? Who are they world leaders, those who attacked? For them, he is a criminal and must be executed, definitely, and not because he is Assad. If you do not execute them, their own people will not understand, to whom they suggested that he is a fiend of hell. Any other general (as you suggested) will also be an enemy of the coalition if he continues his political course. It's not about Assad, but like a fable: You are only to blame for what I want to eat ....
                    Quote: kit88
                    And now, no longer rumors need to be refuted. Real bombs are falling on Damascus, so a comparison with I.V. Stalin - it is quite appropriate.

                    That's for sure, there is no reason to refute Assad’s rumors, I just don’t understand why right now, when the "bombs are falling"? Why is this fake blow worse than when “hailstones”, mortars, guns, tanks, machine guns were beaten, when ISIS slaughtered entire settlements, when they died tens and hundreds from starvation and disease during the blockade of the population to Europe, when under control Assad was less than 15% of the territory of Syria? I do not understand the logic. And I do not understand what the comparison with I.V. Stalin is. To appeal to the nation with an appeal "brothers and sisters - all to fight the aggressor"? This is clearly superfluous. There, everyone understood everything for a long time and are ready to die, defending the Fatherland, those who are not ready to die - those in Europe have long been, many are returning, believing that ISIS is over. And only the United States and other states whose special services sponsor militants can end ISIS - these are their proxies, the tool with which they realize their geopolitical interests. End with Assad - it will be the turn of Iran and Russia. They will transfer their fighters to us in the "underbelly". Here, Turkey will resume financing its proxies in the Crimea, in Kazakhstan, Azerbaijan, etc., everyone will reconcile with the expectation of receiving their piece of cake. This is all the plan of the “Anaconda” of the late 19th century to strangle and squeeze Russia to the north to the size of the Moscow Principality. So Assad cannot be handed over to us - it will become more expensive later.
                    1. 0
                      April 14 2018 20: 15
                      Competently. In the first part I agree completely. However, I want to add on my own behalf that world leaders live not only in Washington-London, but also in Turkey, China, India, Iran. I'm not an orientalist, but is Assad really the only enemy? Why is he not negotiating with non-enemies?
                      In the second part, I would say that we can’t surrender Syria, not Assad. Maybe I don’t fully understand something, and Assad in Syria - like the Sultan in Turkey - everyone fears and respects him and without him the country will fall apart and become mired in internecine wars (as is customary in the East). But for some reason, it seems to me that Assad is a Slab. And he must be changed to a stronger person loyal to Russia.
                      1. +2
                        April 15 2018 12: 05
                        Quote: kit88
                        .... but also in Turkey, China, India, Iran. ... Why doesn’t he conduct any negotiations with non-enemies?

                        All activities (negotiations) have a purpose. The realized goal is the result. For what purpose it is possible to negotiate not with enemies. With a request to provide assistance, to exert pressure on the aggressor, to take part in hostilities. Which country is capable of this without fear of becoming a global outcast and sanctions by the United States, which crushed the whole of Europe and international law? What can Syria offer them in return? Nothing that could compensate for the threatened damage. But there are such countries - those in whose interests to prevent the destruction of Syria, and even those that do not need Assad or Syria. Everything here is determined by the measure of participation in that ratio that would not exceed acceptable threats to one’s own interests. Turkey, for example, claims to be part of the territory of Syria (Erdogan from his friends rewrote Assad as an enemy), a hostage to the current situation, is currently cooperating with Russia. Iran is not interested in the fall of Syria and Assad, a member of the Iran-Syria-Iraq gas triad, which the United States did not like, makes its efforts in support of both Syria and Russian politics, has priority in its interests, but, as for Syria, it’s a partner, in the future, more reliable than Turkey. China - in matters of Syria, provides political support to Russia, at the very military-political confrontation with the United States, Assad - this is not the level at which China can work in this situation, at least officially. India is preoccupied with its problems; now it is quarreling with the United States - it means losing at least possible arms supplies. And why suddenly India?
                        Quote: kit88
                        In the second part, I would say that we can’t surrender Syria, not Assad.
                        Hand over Assad - what's the point? I have already tried to explain that it is not Assad’s business, but his politics. Handing over Assad is a severe blow to Russia's authority in international affairs, which is already not high in terms of supporting its partners, and this is a trick of the West in the expectation that they can intimidate, bribe, slip in a Cossack, and that's all. And you fell for this mantra. We already (pah - our "elite") bought it when we were told that "you will part with communism - you will enter our club" - they have deceived us, now they do not like Orthodoxy more than communism. And so it will be endlessly, until it is devoured.
                        Assad is a very strong personality and enjoys the real support of the majority of the people of Syria, which, judging by the media, may not be visible, but it’s also the media. “There are no independent journalists because there are no neutral consumers of information,” therefore, the media is a manipulation tool and a lot of money is pumped into them. But the logic is that where there is more money there are more opportunities to be more effective. Who can make money by covering Assad’s political activities? Much more will be earned by someone who tries to make sure that he is not heard, and only fables and half-truths are heard and visible, which is worse than a lie, because it is based on facts, with the help of skillful selection of which you can concoct a convincing lie.
          3. +3
            April 14 2018 16: 57
            In this case, you should leave this site. Why? I just don’t like you. And your opinion does not coincide with mine. I’ll drive the neighbors out. Somehow they behave suspiciously.
            In other words, FUCK to you, not Asvd
            1. 0
              April 14 2018 17: 31
              Somehow we think flatly. Like in 1996. Vote or lose. Choose from one candidate. Gennady Andreich didn’t count himself. Like 2018. There is no alternative.
              Surely there is no normal general in Syria who treats Russia well to take power from Assad. Well, Assad is not pulling already! It is necessary to change it. It is clear that to change to "his".
              1. 0
                April 14 2018 21: 35
                meaning? give this general a twitter, and let for the good of Syria PR
                1. 0
                  April 17 2018 07: 56
                  Quote: YELLOWSTONE
                  ... give this general a twitter, and let him PR for the benefit of Syria

                  Give him a sofa, beer, and he will still fight!
                  1. 0
                    April 17 2018 09: 24
                    one of the two, twitter or hookah, for beer is no longer enough.
            2. 0
              April 14 2018 21: 34
              yes, by the way, but this general would not want to help Assad, instead of interfering?
          4. +1
            April 15 2018 01: 23
            Here, Comrade Eun said a couple of affectionate Trump, he was about to bomb Korea.

            Eun can throw an otter in Japan and his immediate neighboring brothers so that even our Far East does not seem enough ... what and where can Assad throw?
          5. 0
            April 17 2018 19: 54
            Assad does not have a vigorous bomb at hand and there are no Amer bases where to throw it, the army has been fighting for 5 years. But Eun has rockets that regularly fly in the direction of the yap, and some kind of test the earth shakes from time to time.
      2. +13
        April 14 2018 14: 18
        Let’s be realistic ... If two-thirds of the missiles were shot down and this is true, then for the Syrian air defense the result is excellent. For ours, it’s not so. The efficiency of the air defense should be at least 0,8. Everyone remained at their best. The Syrians almost did not The Amersans fired back. Ours ... Too many tantrums now. We are of course offended that we didn’t erase the dust ... and the berks ... and our ships would go to the bottom. We could cry like that. then we do ..
        Quote: Black_Jacket
        And is it important? It is important that our "generals" beat their heels in the chest for the umpteenth time, and at that time the star-striped democrats wipe their feet on them.
        1. +6
          April 14 2018 14: 29
          Quote: 210ox
          Let’s be realistic ... If two-thirds of the missiles were shot down and this is true, then for the Syrian air defense the result is excellent. For ours, it’s not so. The efficiency of the air defense should be at least 0,8. Everyone remained at their best. The Syrians almost did not The Amersans fired back. Ours ... Too many tantrums now. We are of course offended that we didn’t erase the dust ... and the berks ... and our ships would go to the bottom. We could cry like that. then we do ..
          Quote: Black_Jacket
          And is it important? It is important that our "generals" beat their heels in the chest for the umpteenth time, and at that time the star-striped democrats wipe their feet on them.

          The image of Russia has suffered, at the moment this is the main thing. Russia warned and threatened with an answer, but the stripes struck, and Russia was silent. Why is not one plane or striped ship still destroyed? A slap in the face, will we really substitute a second cheek?
          1. +21
            April 14 2018 14: 48
            Quote: Lavrenty Pavlovich
            The image of Russia has suffered, at the moment this is the main thing

            Absurdity! The Russian military stated that there would be a "complete response" in cases where:
            1. Attack will affect Russian military installations in Syria ...
            2. Syrian sites where Russian troops, military equipment are under attack ...
            These "conditions" by the Merikos were not "fulfilled" ...! Therefore, do not hysteria and drive a wave of panic!
            1. +4
              April 14 2018 15: 03
              Having calmed down, I also thought about it. And it seems everyone remained with their ...
              But, it feels like a neighbor on the desk satchel on the head fluttered, and you're kind of out of business, draw fields in a notebook, prepare for a lesson what
              1. +2
                April 14 2018 16: 00
                I understand you ! No matter how you explain, the "sediment" is still present ...
                Quote: Ivan Tucha
                But, it feels like a neighbor on the desk satchel on the head fluttered, and you're kind of out of business, draw fields in a notebook, prepare for a lesson
              2. +2
                April 14 2018 17: 11
                Quote: Ivan Tucha
                Having calmed down, I also thought about it. And it seems everyone remained with their ...
                But, it feels like a neighbor on the desk satchel on the head fluttered, and you're kind of out of business, draw fields in a notebook, prepare for a lesson what

                Yes, there is such a feeling ... But he turned his head, looked - and they hit him not on the head, but on the desk. Neighbor Tselehonek. Aggressor inexplicably, shamefully withdrew to think about the situation. Either a neighbor got a hand, or someone helped ...
          2. +3
            April 14 2018 14: 55
            No, don’t substitute. You have to firmly bend your line. Yes, and someone should have a microphone taken from the MO. Give only the results. There’s your mixes and telephone conversations .. This is not given to me. Here I take Rogozin as an example .. Six months ago, he didn’t leave screens and cameras. Our broadcaster. Now they probably warned that he would keep the bazaar .. This concerns everyone now. It's a shame that the image. The image is all thirst. © Wait and see.
            Quote: Lavrenty Pavlovich
            Quote: 210ox
            Let’s be realistic ... If two-thirds of the missiles were shot down and this is true, then for the Syrian air defense the result is excellent. For ours, it’s not so. The efficiency of the air defense should be at least 0,8. Everyone remained at their best. The Syrians almost did not The Amersans fired back. Ours ... Too many tantrums now. We are of course offended that we didn’t erase the dust ... and the berks ... and our ships would go to the bottom. We could cry like that. then we do ..
            Quote: Black_Jacket
            And is it important? It is important that our "generals" beat their heels in the chest for the umpteenth time, and at that time the star-striped democrats wipe their feet on them.

            The image of Russia has suffered, at the moment this is the main thing. Russia warned and threatened with an answer, but the stripes struck, and Russia was silent. Why is not one plane or striped ship still destroyed? A slap in the face, will we really substitute a second cheek?
          3. +1
            April 14 2018 15: 10
            - At the same time, Russian military advisers, representatives of the Center for the Reconciliation of the warring parties and military police officers are in Damascus in the institutions and facilities of the Syrian Defense Ministry. In the event of a life threat to the servicemen from Russia, the Armed Forces will take retaliatory measures of [fire] impact on both the missiles and the carriers that will use them. - warned Valery Gerasimov.
          4. +3
            April 14 2018 15: 23
            A slap in the face, will we really substitute a second cheek?


            It’s not only a slap in the face of Russia ... from the end of the 80s I see one shame - the withdrawal of troops, the 1st Iraqi to the present day - the Syrian and suburban provocations with the arrest of ships and the bombing of LDNR, etc. I’m already getting used to it.

            More terrible is the other - we “threw” the allies' empty voices, which can be counted on the fingers of one hand ... request
            1. +4
              April 14 2018 16: 28
              Quote: freejack
              More terrible is the other - we “threw” the allies' empty voices, which can be counted on the fingers of one hand ...

              Got it? How? Has Russia not delivered to Syria the "recent" 40 complexes of the "Shell-S1"? And if the Syrians placed these "shells" in Damascus to protect state institutions, military institutions, and not around airfields, where did the Syrians transfer equipment to Russian military facilities ..... is Russia also "to blame"?
              But it doesn’t seem “strange” that the Syrians (about whom the Jews brag about having them when they “want” and where they “want” ...) suddenly abruptly shot down almost 70% (St. 2 / 3 ...) KR ? I "have no doubt" that these missile defense systems were shot down from the Syrian air defense positions ... and, even, the Syrian air defense systems ...! We will not guess: were there Russian "instructors" or "military advisers" at the Syrian air defense systems !!! And we do not need the speculation that the Russians secretly transferred to the Syrian positions of C-125, "Squares" "Armor-C1" !!!
              1. 0
                April 14 2018 23: 38
                But it does not seem "strange" ...


                No. it doesn't seem ... I just stopped believing in these numbers. These are the numbers of our MO. No one else confirmed them. And our cowardly elite, including Moscow Region, can also lie without blinking ... We'll look further ... But nothing seriously can change ... The psychology of cowards will remain the psychology of cowards ... It's a pity for our heroic guys - they gave their lives for nothing! !! ((((((((((((
          5. +2
            April 14 2018 16: 13
            The image of Russia suffered when Putin and Kudrin took the money from the sale of oil to the Americans. Kazakhstan has already been deprived of reserves, and soon they will be deprived of us. The economy must be developed, to achieve Chinese growth rates. While rattling air defense systems is Moska's barking.
          6. 0
            April 14 2018 16: 59
            Flight. .. Not enough. .. Wow x, carried. ...
          7. +1
            April 17 2018 08: 03
            Quote: Lavrenty Pavlovich
            The image of Russia has suffered, at the moment this is the main thing. Russia warned and threatened with an answer, but the stripes struck, and Russia was silent. Why is not one plane or striped ship still destroyed? A slap in the face, will we really substitute a second cheek?
            Because you are a sofa troll, that's all.
            They didn’t shoot at Russian military units, and one of the main objectives of the United States was a limited strike, that is, not a massive strike on Russian territory, but a small strike with the most modern American weapons on the territory of the third country that Russia defends, to provoke a response from Russian air defense - not reached. The Buki and Shells exported excellently, 0,92 from Shells, 23 targets with 25 missiles - not bad enough. And these are probably export complexes. But they didn’t untie the third world one, and again they didn’t see the S-400. TTX will be a surprise.
        2. +7
          April 14 2018 14: 33
          We had to show determination. It is we, our air defense, our generals and our diplomats with politicians. Until we do this, the Americans will quietly crush and advance on all fronts.
          And do not be afraid of nuclear war. We shot down them in Korea, shot down in Vietnam so that the pilots refused to perform tasks at all. They shot down their allies (Israel) in Egypt. Until the Americans smell the gunpowder in front of their nose, they will become impudent and crush, such is the nature of the Anglo-Saxons.
          Today, the legs of the Kremlin openly wiped out their image. This is a fact
          1. +8
            April 14 2018 14: 54
            You are a big specialist in geopolitics and of course you have all the necessary information.
            1. +1
              April 14 2018 14: 57
              By yourself, do not judge people and you will be happy.
              1. +1
                April 14 2018 15: 07
                With this joke, I only emphasized that you are in a hurry with conclusions, nothing more. Yes, we have many traitors in the country's leadership, but Gerasimov did not say that he would destroy US carriers because of attacks on Assad’s troops, he talked about retaliatory measures if there would be a threat to the Russian contingent and systems. I quoted below.
                1. +1
                  April 14 2018 15: 26
                  I do not rush to conclusions, but judge in fact. We pumped Georgia, Ukraine pumped, Libya too. Not today or tomorrow we’ll pump Central Asia, everything goes to this. Already today in the Baltic States are Amer aircraft, which fly to Peter 5 minutes. Already today, there are Amer, French and British tanks, which travel 600-700 km to Moscow. Etc. etc,
                  One, just one of our calculations of the C300 or C400 near Damascus, one statement that Russia also took part in nightly events to repel "democratic" aggression would be a strong step. I’m not saying that we should have gasped around Washington ...
                  1. +1
                    April 14 2018 16: 32
                    Quote: Black_Jacket Today, 15:26 ↑
                    I do not rush to conclusions, but judge in fact. We pumped Georgia, Ukraine pumped, Libya too.

                    Is it possible in more detail about Libya. How did we ride such an ally?
                    This is a colonel who has his tent near Sarkozy.
                    Yes, he allocated money for the election. What way did he close up to us as a friend?
                    1. +1
                      April 14 2018 16: 46
                      And you ask Dima, "You hold on there," Medvedev, how with his tacit consent Gaddafi was torn into rags.
                      Where did I say that Libya is our friend?
                      If you argue in terms of "friend is not friend", then in Syria we have nothing to do in Ukraine either. from the first minutes of her “independence”, to put it mildly, she’s not our friend.
                      Libya was an enemy of the United States and the entire Western world. From a geopolitical point of view, I think this is enough to help her.
                      1. +1
                        April 14 2018 18: 09
                        Black_Jacket Today, 16:46 ↑ New
                        And you ask Dima, "You hold on there," Medvedev, how with his tacit consent Gaddafi was torn into rags.
                        Where did I say that Libya is our friend?

                        Did I betray Libya? Libya is not a friend, not an enemy. Therefore, we could not betray and pump it.
        3. +1
          April 14 2018 14: 45
          Really, what are we? Everything is fine, nothing happened, but you’ll think about wiping yourself and go ahead, so what?
          1. +3
            April 14 2018 15: 00
            Alo! 1 Russia's Armed Forces will respond to a US-planned bombing raid on Damascus, if he will be a threat Russian military. As the chief of the General Staff Valery Gerasimov noted, in the areas of the Syrian capital that the United States can strike at, there are Russian troops

            Source: https://versia.ru/glava-genshtaba-valerij-gerasim
            ov-prigrozil-answer-na-vozmozhnyj-udar-ssha-po-d
            amasku
            1. 0
              April 15 2018 04: 50
              Of course, of course, we have already heard about it. Is Assad an ally or not?
              1. 0
                April 15 2018 11: 24
                The fact that Assad turned to Russia for help and we help him makes us "allies" only in the universal sense, among states relations are regulated in documents and the status of these or other relations is also noted, I also note that in these documents the obligations of the parties are fixed according to the points . So I would not apply your civil "ally" without knowing what status we have with Syria. With regard to the assistance provided to the ATS by Russia, we may have provided tacit assistance in repelling an attack on the ATS, but since we do not talk about this and do not comment on the official position of the authorities, the ATS itself repelled the coalition blow and Russian experts did not need help.
        4. +2
          April 14 2018 14: 48
          Hysterics? Yes, no one has it. There is an understanding that we are hostages of our enemies. And think how cool the Americans before the strike called us to say that they would hit, and that we sat and did not rock the boat .... and we sat and did not rock the boat, and then in the morning the guarantor in common phrases remembered nobody interested in international law .. .and? The USA are not directly identified as accomplices of terrorists. How do you like this situation.
        5. 0
          April 14 2018 15: 42
          Quote: 210ox
          Of course, we are insulted that we didn’t erase the dust .. and the berks ... and our ships would have gone to the bottom. And we have cried like that. So what we can, we do ..

          Americans have more ships, fleet exchange is not profitable for them bully
        6. +1
          April 14 2018 16: 44
          You have the wrong calculations. You count all missiles launched, and we are shot down flying into guarded objects. Look at the same "iron dome" in Yrzrail - they knock down there Only what flies into the guarded object, and everything that flies "into the desert" - well, let a piece of iron float to itself x *** " good
          According to our Ministry of Defense, they shot down ALL that flew along the airfields, even at some important facilities. It is not at all clear what they got into, whether it was protected, again everyone claims that Russia was warned and clearly not about time but about whole ones. Hence the only question - why didn’t we guarantee that ALL would be protected? request
          Why the Kremlin did not become a wall "for any attack - we will break in response"? I understand everything about the "delaying" of the great War, but more and more it reminds me "do not succumb to provocations," but on June 22, it is getting closer. And more and more analysts are confirming that if Stalin had applied a preemptive strike to the concentrating troops, or began to transfer the army to the military regime in My - Hitler or whether he would have been defeated with less losses, without a monstrous defeat for 41 years.
      3. +1
        April 14 2018 14: 55
        here no one wiped his feet, it seems more like an agreement.
      4. +1
        April 14 2018 19: 29
        I will tell you that having in this region such a military infrastructure and such allies (although the States themselves are a superpower), they wiped their feet just about them. Do not get excited, think. Ask yourself some very simple questions, such as: why was this attack carried out (military effectiveness is almost zero)? What actions, in your opinion, should the Russian Federation take and on what basis? Why was the attack announced in 2 days? Well, in this context ...
      5. 0
        April 14 2018 21: 39
        I don’t see wiping our feet about us, in this situation, the main thing is to gain time, shoot down missiles and portray an outside observer acting indirectly! And you see I can’t wait to burn out in a global nuclear fire?
    3. +2
      April 14 2018 13: 54
      These are the very smart missiles that the Lord of the universe has declared to the whole world.
      It would be interesting to know at least one smart rocket shot down?
      1. +5
        April 14 2018 14: 03
        Surely. If there is no speed, then the brain will not help much.
      2. +9
        April 14 2018 14: 14
        Quote: Borik
        It would be interesting to know at least one smart rocket shot down?

        No, these are the 17 missiles that were not shot down because they are “smart” and after launch they refused to fly to Syria.
    4. Maz
      +4
      April 14 2018 13: 57
      A-A-A. Well, our MO has news for them. These missiles are complete "DDDDD-O." Make new ones, and we’ll practice on these for now.
      1. +2
        April 14 2018 14: 01
        Quote: Maz
        A-A-A. Well, our MO has news for them. These missiles are complete "DDDDD-O." Make new ones, and we’ll practice on these for now.

        Maz, as always, you're right .. heh heh Many missed it, but it was something when they wet it in real mode, the mat was probably on the air a terrible hehe!
        Everything is fine (options, etc.), thanks Donald! hi
      2. 0
        April 14 2018 14: 53
        Quote: Maz
        A-A-A. Well, our MO has news for them. These missiles are complete "DDDDD-O." Make new ones, and we’ll practice on these for now.

        Lord, but where does this come from?
    5. +6
      April 14 2018 13: 59
      Found on whom to test, even to be tested on the Zulus. I would be glad if these missiles were shot down. Another failure of the US military-industrial complex, and taxpayer money wasted.
      1. +1
        April 14 2018 14: 20
        Everything is much worse there ... After all, there are PONTS! And they are much more expensive than money.
        Quote: RASKAT
        Found on whom to test, even to be tested on the Zulus. I would be glad if these missiles were shot down. Another failure of the US military-industrial complex, and taxpayer money wasted.
    6. +3
      April 14 2018 14: 09
      Quote: ALEXX.
      And were these superfood missiles?


      30 pieces ... those that circumvented outdated Soviet Air Defense
      1. +3
        April 14 2018 14: 31
        Quote: vorobey
        30 pieces ... those that circumvented outdated Soviet Air Defense

        Box "60 minutes" broadcast. So it announced the launch of 120 axes, 103 flew, 71 shot down ... But nothing was said about smart ones. Maybe they will be presented in another batch ...
        1. +3
          April 14 2018 14: 55
          Quote: Boa constrictor KAA
          it was announced the launch of 120 axes, 103 flew, 71 shot down

          So, their 120 didn’t fly at the start of 17? ...
          Not like the Arabs with air defense, in their own way? winked
          Probably again, the microwave ovens were brought from Serbia. what
    7. -1
      April 14 2018 18: 35
      When the US Secretary of Defense announced the destruction of about 200 Wagnerites near Dejerzor, our liars about 5 dead, no confidence. US Secretary, not glamorous Sands, and will not lie. Therefore, this blow will again have to get acquainted with the enemy information, because ours has become worse than the enemy ...
      1. 0
        April 14 2018 21: 34
        Well, believe everything that America says) we brought trump to the throne and trap and weed skripal and the teams we have under full doping without exception)
    8. 0
      April 15 2018 17: 31
      Kremlin experts all buzzed that this b1 only carries bombs without missiles.
  2. 0
    April 14 2018 13: 49
    Where are they the latest, when since 2008 have been released laughing
  3. +4
    April 14 2018 13: 50
    Tomahawks were tested in battle in 91, JAASM - the next generation in 2018. 30 years for a generation.
    1. +5
      April 14 2018 14: 03
      Only the cost is rather big ... 850 green .... apiece ...
      1. +3
        April 14 2018 14: 09
        On the channel of Russia 24 with might and main video of slander from the Tamagavki show ...
        And from this prodigy they will show for sure ...
        1. +8
          April 14 2018 14: 21
          Gauges are also not cheap, as you understand. And their shooting at buildings where ISIS fighters might have spent the night, was also more likely a test than a military one. KR - a specific long-range and accurate weapon, very, very expensive.
          It pays off only when hitting important objects. In other cases - more psychological weapons: "we can get you anywhere, even in the deep rear."
          1. +2
            April 14 2018 14: 27
            And there is also the option that you print money and you do not care how much they cost
            1. +3
              April 14 2018 14: 37
              Yeah, after Libya, they restored the supply of the Kyrgyz Republic for 5 years, if you don’t remember, then raise the topic how the English and French complained at the end of the company that there was nothing to bullet ....
              1. +3
                April 14 2018 14: 46
                It's right. The stock of KR in France and England was then very small.
                After the first volleys in Syria (when the entire stock was fired), Russia also intensively produced Caliber for three months to shoot them in the next volleys. What to do, weapons are very expensive.
                1. 0
                  April 14 2018 14: 58
                  In general, calibers in Syria were not a necessity, every meter could be thrown free-falling cheap bombs, which in warehouses in Russia would be enough for a few soldiers ahead.
                2. 0
                  April 14 2018 14: 59
                  Well, finally I saw a familiar nickname in the News section! maybe it seems to me, but more and more often, that they are sitting alone in the News, and in the Armament section, they are completely different!
          2. 0
            April 14 2018 15: 49
            rather, in order not to be warned by satellite (or whose instructors and journalists whisper in the ear) that it is time for them to change the place of spending the night and paint their helmets in a different color.
          3. dSK
            0
            April 14 2018 16: 12
            Quote: voyaka uh
            Gauges are also expensive - more psychological weapons: "we can get you anywhere, even in the deep rear."
            Keep in mind that in the past century the USSR unofficially “entered and exited” several times from the region. Now Russia will “officially” for at least half a century “stabilize” the peace in the region, and you understand that well.
      2. +6
        April 14 2018 14: 13
        Quote: NN52
        Only the cost is rather big ... 850 green .... apiece ...

        By today's American standards, this is a small cost. It is small, because the rockets themselves are old, they just modernized. If they had created a truly new rocket, then its cost would have been different and measured in millions.
        1. +1
          April 14 2018 14: 19
          Cost Tomahawk 1 cartoon green.
          Therefore, it is not clear where it is expensive, and where it is cheap with them ...
          And the cost for launching from an airplane, I think it will be a little expensive ...
          1. +2
            April 14 2018 17: 13
            Quote: NN52
            Cost Tomahawk 1 cartoon green.

            The cost of the Tomahawk, depending on the modification and warhead, can reach two million dollars.
      3. +1
        April 14 2018 14: 32
        The shed that the Americans burned with this clever rocket was probably zipped out of pure gold. wassat
      4. 0
        April 14 2018 21: 35
        1.400000 if memory serves me apiece
    2. +5
      April 14 2018 14: 03
      Quote: voyaka uh
      Tomahawks were tested in battle in 91, JAASM - the next generation in 2018. 30 years for a generation.

      Stop getting smart .. We will now test our missiles on you! Get ready .. hehe
      1. Don
        +1
        April 14 2018 14: 45
        Quote: MIKHAN
        Stop getting smart .. We will now test our missiles on you! Get ready .. hehe

        Soon again? belay But when will it come soon? I think not under the current government and the current system winked
        1. 0
          April 14 2018 15: 51
          very soon, experienced from the Caspian already.
  4. +7
    April 14 2018 13: 51
    Judging by the GPS window, she does not need it and it's bad! A closed system, you will not affect it EW!
    1. +1
      April 14 2018 13: 57
      Quote: Oleg147741
      AGM-158 JASSM

      As part of the combined guidance system, along with the thermal imaging seeker borrowed from the AGM-130 planning bomb (operating at the final guidance site), an inertial control system with correction according to the NAVSTAR ARS data and hardware and software for autonomous target recognition are used. To direct the missile at the target, correlation comparison algorithms for the detected object (targeting area) obtained in the IR range of the image are used with the reference signatures stored in the onboard computer, which also allows you to automatically select the optimal targeting point.
    2. Maz
      +4
      April 14 2018 13: 58
      How is it not a window? And on the nose what? Marker? Postcard?
      1. +2
        April 14 2018 14: 22
        So he said that there is! The window is ..
        Quote: Maz
        How is it not a window? And on the nose what? Marker? Postcard?
    3. +3
      April 14 2018 14: 13
      Quote: Oleg147741
      Judging by the GPS window, she does not need it and it's bad! A closed system, you will not affect it EW!

      Yeah, AI fully! Already got with AI!
    4. +2
      April 14 2018 14: 35
      Quote: Oleg147741
      you will not affect it EW!

      Have you tried an electromagnetic pulse? belay
      Try it, they say it turns out! Yes
  5. 0
    April 14 2018 13: 56
    Earlier, analysts noted that the use of this weapon will prevent the Americans from accidentally defeating Russian targets.
    Ahhhhhh! We tried our best! Do not hit us! what
  6. +19
    April 14 2018 13: 56
    Less than a month ago, Vladimir Vladimirovich promised all of us a whole decade of plague victories. Today in the early morning we saw the first victory from an endless series of subsequent victories.
    1. +4
      April 14 2018 14: 06
      Quote: Giants
      Less than a month ago, Vladimir Vladimirovich promised all of us a whole decade of plague victories. Today in the early morning we saw the first victory from an endless series of subsequent victories.

      Today is your holiday ... he he he Jews and liberals ..
      You are lucky for the red ones! negative
      1. +2
        April 14 2018 14: 25
        Greetings!
        It is well noticed that the fifth column stirred. Well and after them - all-crawler.
      2. +4
        April 14 2018 14: 28
        Quote: MIKHAN

        Today is your holiday ... he he he Jews and liberals ..

        Go to bed, grandfather, in the morning you work tirelessly. Look for Jews and liberals in the Kremlin.
      3. +1
        April 14 2018 14: 53
        Liberasty, just in the Kremlin, are also sitting in the White House, on the embankment.
      4. 0
        April 14 2018 14: 56
        Quote: MIKHAN
        Quote: Giants
        Less than a month ago, Vladimir Vladimirovich promised all of us a whole decade of plague victories. Today in the early morning we saw the first victory from an endless series of subsequent victories.

        Today is your holiday ... he he he Jews and liberals ..
        You are lucky for the red ones! negative

        Meehan. Your opinion has changed several times today, this is not normal.
    2. +3
      April 14 2018 14: 10
      On this site there is a direct propaganda team of such scavengers.
    3. +1
      April 14 2018 14: 16
      Quote: Giants
      Less than a month ago, Vladimir Vladimirovich promised all of us a whole decade of plague victories. Today in the early morning we saw the first victory from an endless series of subsequent victories.

      1. endless;
      2. who knows who promised what to anyone, Trump said different things before the election and after;
      3. yes;
      4. but how much imagination you need to show in order to bring this situation into your asset. and after all they try, though, basically, they write the same thing as if under carbon copy ...
      1. +1
        April 14 2018 14: 37
        Quote: Eduard Petrov
        4. but how much imagination you need to show in order to bring this situation into your asset. and after all they try, though, basically, they write the same thing as if under carbon copy ...

        You are wrong if you think I have a holiday today. Have you heard about the response in case of an attack? Yes they were. Did the answer follow? No. Will you argue with the fact that in us (in the country, not only in Putin) they spat again?
    4. +2
      April 14 2018 14: 17
      And what is “unbeaten”? Stripes before hitting the bottom asked permission to attack certain objects ... for status ...
    5. +10
      April 14 2018 14: 42
      Quote: Giants
      early morning we saw the first victory

      Observer horseradish.
      Well, what did you see?
      Launched more than a hundred missiles in Syria, what is the result? How many hundreds of kilometers was the nearest flight route of the Kyrgyz Republic from our bases? Did the business help the barmaleas?
      Yes, Trump Malenko began to feel more cheerful before the old freaking party members in Congress and didn’t offend our Bashar much, he warned in advance that he had to prepare, and, as a result, the damage was much less than the cost of the missiles. Pro-American barmaley will now be “wetted” in an ever-increasing way, Syria will most likely receive the S-300 (400), Iskander, which will greatly delight Israel and its Zionist lobbyists in the United States. If only Assad had special ammunition, they would simply “euphorize” it with joy.
      Well, all Americans, Europeans, voters are right after all indulging in their leaders - proteges of Russia, serpents and pasta. They say bluntly: we’ll lay our bones in a nuclear war, but we won’t disgrace shit democracy. lol There may be some, but not all are fucked on the head in the US and the EU.
      And yet, I heard it myself, the Shell has risen in price at times ...
  7. +4
    April 14 2018 14: 07
    No military damage, more media noise. We are heroes, we were fucking, we were not afraid ... The sense of these blows. We, too, can launch Caliber somewhere in the Mediterranean Sea and yell: and we are heroes, we answered, etc. etc.
    1. +1
      April 14 2018 15: 08
      The question is this; Syria is an ally or not? If so, then the fact of aggression on the face must be punished so that it is not disgraceful. Tomorrow, in order to raise political rating, the clown Tram-Pam-Pampamu will want to shoot at the DNI, again we’ll mop up? We pay taxes on the army to protect people. I do not want losses, but they will increase many times if the Saki inhumane feels impunity and the fear of our leadership will respond harshly. The Secretary General of the USSR clearly understood this, they besieged the bourgeoisie all over the planet, only sheets of skin flew from the equipment and the 200s and 300s came to the Union. How, then, when is the war?
      1. +1
        April 14 2018 18: 46
        Syria is an ally or not? If yes, then the fact of aggression on the face
        the fact of aggression has been on the face for a long time (the same state bases on the territory of Syria, outright assistance to terrorists, etc. etc.). One thing is clear that the answer must be - but it must be proportionate, otherwise we will be accused of incredible, unjustified aggression. For example, not a single Russian was injured from the launch of 100 KR, among Syrians, it is reported that 3 people were injured. Suppose, in response, we strike with a dagger drowned by a state destroyer with several hundred sailors. Can such an answer be considered proportionate? What all the world media will write about - that humane geldings really didn’t even hurt anyone, and aggressive and bloodthirsty Russia took the lives of hundreds of innocent American sailors. Will show everyone photos of really dead sailors, and who looking at the photo will say that they need it so?
        In short, the answer must be proportionate - on our part, no one died, so we must answer so that no one died on their part either.
        1. 0
          April 14 2018 21: 37
          How do you know that no one died? there are such ruins.
          if that story with the Su-24 is not enough, remind them of Kursk
          1. 0
            April 14 2018 21: 51
            There are no messages yet, except for a few wounded.
            1. 0
              April 14 2018 22: 25
              such a large complex of buildings was not guarded by anyone at all? then there and through the bunkers on the eve of the arrival of the unworthy OPCW, it was possible not only to bring tomahawks but even on foot to bring the necessary substances.
  8. +5
    April 14 2018 14: 07
    The Syrian ancient S-125s, which are still remembered by Phantoms in the Vietnamese sky, did not know anything about these "invisibles." Well did not tell them. And they beat them. Absolutely "illegitimate"
    1. +1
      April 14 2018 14: 31
      The Syrians Since 125 80th years of release - upgraded in the 2000s.
  9. +6
    April 14 2018 14: 08
    Of the 103 missiles, 71 were shot down. Normal move. Syrian Air Defense.
    drinks
  10. +1
    April 14 2018 14: 09
    I ask everyone not to be confused! Such a result - when 103 of the 71 missiles were destroyed, it was obtained as a result of the use of Russian electronic warfare ... Therefore, the United States and its allies were warned - as soon as, immediately and not only !!!
    1. +1
      April 14 2018 14: 13
      Previously, there were no such results ... And of course the use of the Shell and Buk complexes, although our media refute!
    2. 0
      April 14 2018 14: 17
      Official information. EW is not mentioned.
    3. +1
      April 15 2018 17: 37
      "71 were destroyed was obtained as a result of the use of Russian electronic warfare ..." ///

      No, the result was obtained in a different way. laughing
      The Syrian media wrote: "17 rockets shot down." But they write from right to left.
      And the Russian media turned 17 when translating 71.
      Without any electronic warfare and missiles shot down much more.
  11. The comment was deleted.
  12. +3
    April 14 2018 14: 18
    In response to: "ours blinked, not shot down, about ... whether, etc.". Syrian air defense - essentially the old Soviet. And landed a certain number (a little later, everyone will calculate and tell) the latest AGM-158. Suppose: (hypothetically) ours knew in advance about the attack, then they monitored in real time, made sure that our military was not hurt. And they did not use their own, more modern systems (I dare to hope they are a bit more efficient than the Syrian ones). And then: competently promoting this story - we get several bonuses:
    - The effectiveness of Soviet still developments is shown (more modern weapons are gently advertised)
    - The actual effectiveness of the latest developments (cr. missiles) against state. structures, and not against the Papuans, who have no means of countering cruise missiles.
    - A number of more modern systems will be transferred to Syria to ensure state security.
  13. 0
    April 14 2018 14: 23
    http://pda.mil.ru/pda/news_main.htm?id=12171300@e
    gNews
  14. The comment was deleted.
  15. +7
    April 14 2018 14: 28
    Let me summarize some of the results:
    Ally, we are so-so ... I would not have led such alliances.
    If it is true that more than half of Syria’s NATO air defense missiles have ebbed, then this is simply gorgeous news. That's real!
    There will be no fatal consequences for Assad and the Syrian armed forces. Everything is fine.
    Trump proved to be a cool cowboy, strengthened his image among the hawks of Congress and now will not touch Syria for a long time.
    Well and the last: V. Putin should be reminded that all revolutions and fermentations in Russia began with defeats and military humiliations (Crimean War, Russian-Japanese and partly World War I). It is necessary to draw conclusions. At least not let the Papuans saloids nightmare our fishermen and civilian sailors.
  16. 0
    April 14 2018 14: 28
    the use of American high-precision air-to-surface cruise missiles AGM-158 JASSM

    Lockheed Martin, an American corporation, introduced its high-precision KR AGM-2002 JASSM in 158. The Americans were able to achieve a range from 500 (base AGM-158) to 1300 km (AGM-158B with a significantly increased fuel supply and a more economical turbofan), hit accuracy (KVO) did not exceed 3 m, while the mass of the rocket is 1020 kg, and Warhead 430 kg. The missile has an inertial guidance principle with radio correction according to the information received by the NAVSTAR military satellite system in the main flight section and IR guidance in the final section and immediately before the target. When using a rocket at ranges over 200 km, it becomes necessary to use a strategic reconnaissance aircraft RC-135V, which plays the role of an air repeater, receiving and processing data from an infrared seeker, in which a thermal image of the target is currently transmitted
  17. +3
    April 14 2018 14: 29
    Quote: Bere
    Of the 103 missiles, 71 were shot down. Normal move. Syrian Air Defense.
    drinks

    Good advertisement for our defense industry. Capitalism in a word, the loot won.
    Arabs and Indians will now line up for newer air defense systems.
    Everyone vparivaet their products as they can.
    The Americans made good money in Japan and Korea.
    They expose to Comrade Kim the main condition for lifting sanctions - the cessation of the production of ICBMs capable of getting the United States.
    And they don’t even stutter about the INF, it’s necessary to pound the Japanese with something, so that they would run up to buy patriots with a kimono.
  18. +2
    April 14 2018 14: 35
    The era of the Tomahawks ingloriously ends ... The era of smart Pentagon missiles of the AGM-158 type is likely to end (before they start), because the range is 1000 km. for developed air defense is not a threat .... Russian KR fly 5000 km, and the new "Petrel" time and distance do not care at all ... and his warhead may be "the most unusual" ....
    1. +1
      April 14 2018 16: 15
      For advanced air defense, a massive attack by kamikaze drones is a threat, the AGM-158 will finish off all that remains - calculations without missiles.
  19. +5
    April 14 2018 14: 37
    Quote: Lavrenty Pavlovich
    Quote: 210ox
    Let’s be realistic ... If two-thirds of the missiles were shot down and this is true, then for the Syrian air defense the result is excellent. For ours, it’s not so. The efficiency of the air defense should be at least 0,8. Everyone remained at their best. The Syrians almost did not The Amersans fired back. Ours ... Too many tantrums now. We are of course offended that we didn’t erase the dust ... and the berks ... and our ships would go to the bottom. We could cry like that. then we do ..
    Quote: Black_Jacket
    And is it important? It is important that our "generals" beat their heels in the chest for the umpteenth time, and at that time the star-striped democrats wipe their feet on them.

    The image of Russia has suffered, at the moment this is the main thing. Russia warned and threatened with an answer, but the stripes struck, and Russia was silent. Why is not one plane or striped ship still destroyed? A slap in the face, will we really substitute a second cheek?

    How did you get the couch military. And with a summons to the draft board, is he ready to run for general mobilization? Db
    I just want to warn you, smartphones will be selected at the entrance.
  20. +2
    April 14 2018 14: 39
    Who often bukhtitel on the position of Belarus?

    Belarus strongly condemns attacks on Syria
    April 14, Minsk / Corr. BelTA /. Belarus strongly condemns the attacks on the territory of the Syrian Arab Republic on April 14, 2018. This is stated in a statement by the Belarusian Foreign Ministry, BelTA informs.
  21. +2
    April 14 2018 14: 41
    71 out of 103 for Syrian air defense is more than success, and they have not received any answers on the carriers, but how many vaunted missile defense systems will hit in response ??? it’s better to remain a mystery. And how many new ones were brought down will not be told by the truth, not one side of the conflict, some will work on missiles, others on missile defense.
    1. +1
      April 14 2018 16: 54
      And got a lot of experience, skills gained. Now, Israel will not just bomb Syria with impunity ... Good advertisement for the air defense system of the Russian Federation. Now, presumably, Moscow will strengthen the Syrians S-300 (400), and maybe it will add anti-ship missiles with electronic warfare. hi
  22. 0
    April 14 2018 14: 46
    It is already obvious that our military advisers worked successfully in Syrian air defense ...
    And our fellows did not allow to detect their radar and electronic warfare ... The Yankees did not achieve their goal ...
    1. 0
      April 14 2018 14: 58
      https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=_72YSz0fNCw
  23. The comment was deleted.
  24. The comment was deleted.
  25. The comment was deleted.
  26. +2
    April 14 2018 14: 53
    Quote: serezhen-s
    They say that artists of the Russian Ministry of Defense are right now for Putin urgently a new cartoon
    draw to answer adversaries.

    When you understand that what was shown in the cartoons (not, well, you immediately needed to present the latest developments with all the performance characteristics and photo-video, it is still advisable to touch it) is not intended to participate in local foreign conflicts. This is a weapon to destroy the aggressor, who opposed our country. After the use of such weapons, nothing else will have to be used. And we are unlikely to be able to discuss this.
  27. +1
    April 14 2018 14: 57
    Quote: sefevi
    Who said that?))) Of course, those who make a good face with a bad game. Watch channels other than Vesti. There you will see Syrian objects shattered into slivers

    ---------------------------------
    Are they just other news channels? I have the impression that other channels are even more propaganda, if even the BBC does not disdain staged filming for "news". I’m silent about news giants like Al Jazzira and CNN.
  28. 0
    April 14 2018 14: 59
    When striking Syria, the US experienced the latest missiles

    Two articles
    Shell C1 during a missile strike in Syria from 50 missiles shot down 44

    https://cont.ws/@4pion/915490?utm_campaign=transi
    t & utm_source = mirtesen & utm_medium = news &
    ;
    ; from = mirtesen
    The embarrassment of the day: Trump's smart missiles shot down in Syria by Soviet air defense

    https://cont.ws/@vityzeva/915394
  29. +1
    April 14 2018 15: 01
    Negotiated again;))) Nothing has changed since Vietnam. Personally, I expected something like this, the only question was “how many axes will be knocked down.” According to CNN, there was infa that ours didn’t even turn on tracking radars, they just monitored. And the planes did not take to the air. For fighters of the Kyrgyz Republic on the march, "fat duck", it was possible to train pilots, 30-50 pieces would surely have failed. Americans gouged empty buildings, trained Syrian air defense ... In general, an agreement, 100%.
  30. 0
    April 14 2018 15: 01
    Quote: Seaflame
    Ally, we are so-so ... I would not have led such alliances.
    If it is true that more than half of Syria’s NATO air defense missiles have ebbed, then this is simply gorgeous news. That's real!
    There will be no fatal consequences for Assad and the Syrian armed forces. Everything is fine.

    ---------------------------------
    We are very good ally, or are you suggesting, because of Syria, to start the World War as Nicholas II because of Serbia and to get into chaos? The result of 70% was achieved not by the "Syrian" air defense, but by the Syrian air defense we updated, with new radars and warning means. That "Syrian" air defense has long been echoed in 2011-2014.
  31. +1
    April 14 2018 15: 01
    Air defense of the SAR and calculations of electronic warfare of the Russian Federation worked hard this time
    Of the more than 100 “smart”, “beautiful”, “white” missiles, less than 25% reached the targets., We repeat less than 25%!
    Due to the coordinated and operational work of the Air Defense Center of the Russian Federation in the territory of the Syrian Arab Republic, all hits caused only minor material damage, since the evacuation and clarification of the objectives of the SAM
    Killed or wounded, among civilians and the military - no.
    https://m.vk.com/syriantube
    1. 0
      April 14 2018 15: 16
      in general, to be precise, they released 103 shot down 71 total 32 this is a little more than 30% and not 25% so it’s not worth cheating!
  32. 0
    April 14 2018 15: 05
    Although 70 shot down is hard to believe ... Maybe 70 flew out of 120 - this is more plausible ..
  33. +2
    April 14 2018 15: 06
    “Duvali airfield - 4 missiles, all shot down; - Dumeir airfield - 12 missiles, all shot down; - Bley airfield - 18 missiles, all shot down; - Shairat airfield - 12 missiles, all shot down; - unused Mezze airfield - 5 missiles shot down; - Homs airdrome - 16 of 13 missiles destroyed, no serious damage; - Objects in the area of ​​NP Barza and Jaramani - 30 missiles, 7 shot down; objects partially destroyed, the objects themselves have not been used for a long time, people and equipment were not on them. “None of the Kyrgyz Republic entered the zone of Russian air defense, Russian air defense was not used.” Colonel General Sergey Rudskoy.
  34. 0
    April 14 2018 15: 12
    Quote: Karakurt
    If a fight is inevitable, it is necessary to beat first - Vladimir Putin, a fight can still be avoided feel request

    Perhaps a fight ahead. They talked about a possible 600 or more CDs, but only 110 were pulled. Why would this be?
    1. +1
      April 14 2018 16: 18
      Reinforcements from the sea have not yet arrived - there will be 600 tomahawks and thousands of other things.
  35. 0
    April 14 2018 15: 13
    given the cost of tomahawk missiles from open sources of the order of 600 thousand for 1 pc. and considering that 71 pcs. not fulfilled its task a very tidy sum comes out! this is not taking into account the fact that when purchasing missiles they acquire spare parts and ... everything is interesting to Wikipedia, the sum is about $ 200-300 million. Given the good low-cost but fairly effective air defense of Syria, the United States suffered significant financial losses and it is not known whether they will continue! All this, apart from what is being discussed everywhere, suggests that this incident will raise even greater interest in Russian air defense systems, especially after the United States advertised its tomahawks in such a way that the Soviet systems were quite effective in knocking them down! and yes it’s good that there are no dead! theory is better than practice in such matters!
    1. 0
      April 14 2018 15: 25
      It has already been written that the massons (FRS) will print as much as they like and print the wrappers around the world. Why on the territory of the Russian Federation is everything tied to enemy paper cut? Citizens s / n and pensions in rubles, it seems, receive. And .... because capitalism. Duc, he needs a working man, some are not convenience.
  36. 0
    April 14 2018 15: 20
    So the advertisement was drawn not bad by our (quite not new) air defense laughing
    1. 0
      April 14 2018 15: 52
      The conclusion suggests itself, the Anglo-Saxons with rackets are afraid of nothing, to continue their work to free Syria from bandits and terrorists at an even faster pace, to finish off all the shortcomings ....
  37. 0
    April 14 2018 15: 45
    Quote: Donskoy
    Quote: yaros
    Taki in fact yes judging by the result

    And were you definitely interested in the results or trying to find evidence for your opinion? The Iranians here give data that 120 was shot down from 13 missiles. Or are they also ranked by the State Department?

    if they give such a reason, why don’t you refer to the source or should you all believe in words, maybe you generally read the sites of white helmets and then you push about the Iranians))))!
  38. +1
    April 14 2018 15: 45
    Sarmatians were adopted, therefore, Satan can, must be leased to Eun and Syria.
  39. 0
    April 14 2018 15: 51
    And where are the comments of the Israelis ?? They also have to write a lot in the media, even satellite images are used. Very interesting and "independent" assessments of the situation to learn;))
  40. 0
    April 14 2018 15: 51
    It doesn’t matter what inbound-outbound data was, but - “It's a shame for the State!” ©
  41. 0
    April 14 2018 16: 09
    -What kind of newest things are there ... -the usual subsonic stuff ... -for one and from the old they were freed ... and shot at targets ...
  42. +1
    April 14 2018 16: 13
    And these new missiles shot down? But what is especially worrying. so it is that Syria may not withstand a more massive blow. In addition, perhaps now the war will begin in the Donbass. The Kiev junta will want to support its western patrons. It is necessary to prepare for protection and the Donbass. All this is very dangerous.
  43. 0
    April 14 2018 16: 59
    It’s funny after the terrible Russian warnings that pin_os and the hangers-on still struck, it’s not about what new missiles they used, they didn’t fly, they just checked Russia, well, as expected (we were very worried) everything is fine, now you can bomb when if they want and how much they want, moreover now all the mongrels will dare and next time they will join to shoot, knowing that there won’t be anything. Well, they’ll debate at the UN they’ll scound the bastards, but they wouldn’t give a damn. fell under the bench, and the rest realized that it can be very painful, and do not violate international laws
  44. 0
    April 14 2018 17: 01
    I do not want to convince skeptics of the behavior of the Russian Armed Forces in this situation. It’s easier for them to decide what to write on the couch.
  45. +1
    April 14 2018 17: 04
    I did not understand the couple about smart missiles, those that shot down or those that were smart and did not fly
  46. +1
    April 14 2018 17: 10
    how many experts there are horror and Ukrainians and liberals and Chukchi and Tatars and Russophobes - languages ​​were dismissed as market women - then 120 missiles then 90 missiles then 13 shot down then 73 shot down - your imagination has no limits; you better play tanks and don't get distracted
  47. 0
    April 14 2018 17: 47
    To summarize. The President said 2 things: 1 Syria is our ally. 2 Russia will defend its territory and its allies. There were already 2 unpunished salvos with axes in Syria. Here the question arises: Belarus is our ally. Will Russia react in the same way when axes fly to Belarus? Think and give an answer yourself
    1. +2
      April 14 2018 17: 50
      Quote: synodontis
      To summarize. The President said 2 things: 1 Syria is our ally ...

      That's enough.
      You were not taught as a child that lying is bad?
      Campaign, no. But in vain - it’s possible to rake for something like that ... well, very nipadetski wink
      Quote: synodontis
      Will Russia react in the same way when axes fly to Belarus?

      Mandatory. Belarus is a member of the Collective Security Treaty Organization (Collective Security Treaty Organization). Syria - no, and did not lie close.
      There you have the difference. Everything is really very very simple Yes
      1. +1
        April 14 2018 18: 11
        Syria is an ally of Russia, but there is no agreement on allied relations with it, said presidential spokesman Dmitry Peskov.
        The building of the Council of the Federation of the Russian Federation. Archive photo
        © RIA Novosti / Vladimir Fedorenko
        Go to the photo bank
        Russia is ready for US sanctions over Syria, said in the Federation Council

        Earlier, Russian President Vladimir Putin said in a message to the Federal Assembly that Moscow would "consider any use of nuclear weapons against Russia or its allies as a nuclear attack on our country, the answer will be instant and with all the ensuing consequences."

        "As far as I know, Russia and Syria do not have a comprehensive document on allied relations. As far as I know, there is no such document," said Peskov, answering the question whether the Russian Federation would protect Syria if nuclear weapons are used.

        "She is an ally, of course, Syria is our ally, but, as you understand, from the point of view of international obligations, allied relations are formed using a contractual basis," he added.


        RIA Novosti https://ria.ru/syria/20180302/1515614732.html
        This is how it is now formulated ... Previously, completely different formulations sounded when the bases were provided for long times. You are a young man badly brought up
        1. +1
          April 14 2018 18: 25
          Quote: synodontis
          This is how it is now formulated ... Previously, completely different formulations sounded

          I do not know what and where "sounded before". But I know for sure that military alliances (and what about this alliance, ahem, are you trying to rub here?) Are documented.
          And I know for sure that Russia does not have such an agreement with Syria Yes
          Dot. Fatty. Like trolls grazing everywhere laughing
          And all of your further "multibolts" are about nothing.
          Quote: synodontis
          You are a young man badly brought up

          I repeat, I am not a girl to please everyone. And, yes - if I am a "young man" for you, then this ... is bad ... there was a hope that you would learn to control what you wrote. Now she's gone - you have a pretty solid age for this.
          Regrettably request
  48. 0
    April 14 2018 17: 57
    Yankees loot washed with junk
  49. +4
    April 14 2018 18: 15
    I read the comments and was stunned. It feels like a third of site visitors are moronic teenagers with increased aggressiveness due to a hormonal explosion. "Caved in, settled down, scared ..." didn’t drown a single ship, didn’t bring down a single plane ... Do you really want to see a nuclear mushroom? Or you live in a goat region and hope that you will not be hurt. But then you can play the survivors, like Berkem Al Atomi or Doronin. Everything is so fascinatingly described there!
    I was very anxious and uncomfortable with the last days. We, in Perm, have several goals for nuclear weapons. And indeed in the Urals there are few places where it will not fly. So hiding is useless.
    And if without emotions to consider the situation? In recent days, the inadequate president of the United States has said a lot of unnecessary things on Twitter. Our military and diplomats responded. As a result, it became extremely difficult to resolve the conflict without losing face. And the fact that the strike on Syria is an “agreement” is a very likely option that suits all parties. It seems that Trump fulfilled his threat, but the Russians did not suffer. And the Syrians practically did not suffer any damage. In general, it reminds a typically American form of the show - wrestling. It seems that the bogeys are beating scared and fiercely, and neither bruises nor blood.
  50. 0
    April 14 2018 20: 52
    Looks like our supposedly Zircon
  51. 0
    April 14 2018 21: 34
    The question immediately arises: the Ministry of Defense stated that almost all of the MISSILES were shot down, the defeat was mainly from gliding bombs. Question: either the missiles are crap, or the Defense Ministry is lying
  52. 0
    April 14 2018 21: 49
    these are floats from a seaplane
  53. The comment was deleted.
  54. The comment was deleted.
    1. 0
      April 15 2018 15: 35
      Where does the data come from? Not sarcasm, I really wonder where such confidence comes from.
  55. 0
    April 15 2018 17: 49
    Quote: just EXPL
    1) not the fact that these missiles were shot down.
    2) the shell and beech-m2 with moss did not have time to overgrow.

    Tomahawks were invented 30 years ago, so old weapons fought on both sides. Well, we experienced a little new
  56. 0
    April 15 2018 17: 59
    Quote: Artemy
    http://www.syriahr.com/en/?p=89324

    The most serious source
  57. 0
    April 18 2018 17: 43
    If the “newest” missiles are shot down in batches by weapons that were 40 years old, it means I am 40 years behind GREAT RUSSIA!!! that is FOREVER!!!
  58. 0
    April 19 2018 18: 18
    Quote: Ratmir_Ryazan
    Not the fact that missiles were shot down at all ...
    You can declare anything (after using frames of a computer game as evidence of faith in our MO’s word, there were 71 missiles shot down - show the debris of exactly 71 missiles, if there are none, then there are no missiles shot down.
    In fact, not the newest planes attacked Syria with impunity, and we tightened our tail and shouted that it didn’t hurt us ... Well, now wait for the arrival of such missiles every minute, Trump will no longer warn in two days ...

    The Syrians handed over two unexploded missiles in good condition to the Russian military... . sad
  59. 0
    April 20 2018 04: 04
    The missiles were smart - so smart that two missiles deserted and
    went over to the enemy's side. Russian scientists are happy to communicate with them!

"Right Sector" (banned in Russia), "Ukrainian Insurgent Army" (UPA) (banned in Russia), ISIS (banned in Russia), "Jabhat Fatah al-Sham" formerly "Jabhat al-Nusra" (banned in Russia) , Taliban (banned in Russia), Al-Qaeda (banned in Russia), Anti-Corruption Foundation (banned in Russia), Navalny Headquarters (banned in Russia), Facebook (banned in Russia), Instagram (banned in Russia), Meta (banned in Russia), Misanthropic Division (banned in Russia), Azov (banned in Russia), Muslim Brotherhood (banned in Russia), Aum Shinrikyo (banned in Russia), AUE (banned in Russia), UNA-UNSO (banned in Russia), Mejlis of the Crimean Tatar People (banned in Russia), Legion “Freedom of Russia” (armed formation, recognized as terrorist in the Russian Federation and banned)

“Non-profit organizations, unregistered public associations or individuals performing the functions of a foreign agent,” as well as media outlets performing the functions of a foreign agent: “Medusa”; "Voice of America"; "Realities"; "Present time"; "Radio Freedom"; Ponomarev; Savitskaya; Markelov; Kamalyagin; Apakhonchich; Makarevich; Dud; Gordon; Zhdanov; Medvedev; Fedorov; "Owl"; "Alliance of Doctors"; "RKK" "Levada Center"; "Memorial"; "Voice"; "Person and law"; "Rain"; "Mediazone"; "Deutsche Welle"; QMS "Caucasian Knot"; "Insider"; "New Newspaper"