General Burnside's carbine: the first with a metal cartridge

67
General Burnside's carbine: the first with a metal cartridge

General Ambrose Burnside. Commanding the Army of the Potomac, he grew such sideburns, which were later named after him.

He fired once, and fired two, and a bullet whistled into the bushes ...
"You shoot like a soldier," Kamal said, "show me how you drive."
R. Kipling. Ballad of West and East


Military affairs at the turn of the eras. Perhaps, not so often war spurs the development of society so rapidly as it was, for example, during the American Civil War in 1861-1865. It began with one weapons, but ended, in fact, already with another, and this at a time when the inertia of thinking was extremely powerful, downright crushing impenetrable. But the need compelled, and time rushed forward with unprecedented speed. This concerned, first of all, small arms, the most massive weapon of war.



In one of the past articles, the Hall rifle, the first breech-loading rifle in the United States, aroused great interest among VO readers. Today we will also talk about another example of small arms that appeared there at the turn of the century: Burnside's first breech-loading cartridge carbine.

Well, we will have to start by mentioning that the Hall carbine, which has served faithfully to the American cavalry for a long time, is outdated both morally and physically, and it was decided to replace it with something new. And on this "something" the US government was ready to pay 90 thousand dollars, the money at that time is very considerable. And, of course, many wanted to get them.

As for Ambrose Burnside, after graduating from West Point in 1847, he had already managed to fight both in Mexico and with the Indians, he knew well what problems cavalrymen have with weapons. And knowing, he tried to create a cavalry carbine, devoid of the shortcomings known to him. Moreover, he left the service already in 1853. Apparently, her hardships seemed too "painful" to the young officer.

Again, we recall that this was the time of the muzzle-loaded capsule weapon. The standard weapon of the American infantry in those years was precisely the musket of the 1855 model (modernized in 1861), which, of course, was in no way suitable for the rider, even when converted into a carbine.


Rifle (musket) 1861. By 1865, more than one million of them were produced, but everyone understood that the time of these weapons was up! Department stories technology, military history, National Museum of American History, Smithsonian Institution



Cook's carbine in .58 caliber (14,7 mm). Produced by Cook on the model of the English Enfield rifles. From 1861 to 1862, the firm was based in New Orleans, Louisiana, but was forced to leave the city with the approach of northern troops. In 1863, the firm settled in Athens, Georgia, where it continued to manufacture firearms for the army of the South. Department of History of Technology, History of the Armed Forces, National Museum of American History, Smithsonian Institution

Did Burnside have predecessors on whose designs he could look and take something from them? Yes, there were, in particular, Christian Sharps, who patented his rifle back in 1848; moreover, from 1850 it began to be produced by various American factories. It was also loaded from the breech with a traditional paper cartridge with a Minier bullet, it had primer ignition, but there was one interesting detail in its design: just a sharp edge at the vertically sliding bolt on the side adjacent to the breech. However, it was this find that made his weapon truly popular. Having manually inserted the cartridge into the barrel chamber, the shooter had only to return the shutter control lever, successfully combined with the trigger guard, to its original place. The bolt went up, cut off the bottom of the paper sleeve with a sharp edge, so now all that was left was to put the capsule on the hose and ... shoot. No more "knead the cartridge", "bite the cartridge", "push the cartridge into the barrel" was no longer required!


Sharps capsule breech-loading rifle of 1859. Weight 4,3 kg. Caliber 13,2 mm. Department of History of Technology, History of the Armed Forces, National Museum of American History, Smithsonian Institution


The receiver of the Sharps carbine in 1859. A brace with a ring indicates that it is a cavalry weapon. Department of History of Technology, History of the Armed Forces, National Museum of American History, Smithsonian Institution



Sharps carbine M1856 Royal Arsenal, Leeds


It is interesting that the Sharps M1856 carbine had a device for automatic installation of primers. A box with a door was attached to it, inside which was a gear wheel that rotated when the hammer was cocked. At the same time, a copper tape (like on children's toy pistols!) With an initiating compound pressed into it was fed to the brand tube, on which the firing pin of the trigger hit! However, this system still did not supplant the cylindrically worn capsules. Barrel length 451 mm. Total length 891 mm. Caliber .56. Royal Arsenal, Leeds

True, the paper sleeves were not always well removed, and besides, they were soaked in water, which Burnside did not like. Therefore, he simultaneously invented both a cartridge and a carbine, and as a result, it was his sample that became the first model of small arms in US history for a metal cartridge.


Cartridge for the Burnside carbine. The caliber of the cartridge is 13,72x48 mm (.54), the mass of the bullet is 32,4 grams, the weight of black powder is 4,2 grams, the muzzle velocity is 290 m / s. The cartridge has an unusual shape: there is a thickening in the sleeve filled with lubricating grease, a recess in the bottom of the cartridge and a hole covered with wax. When the trigger is hit on the primer (which is put on the hose separately), the flame burns through the wax and ignites the gunpowder. The lubricant protects the barrel from the effects of powder gases

This cartridge was Burnside's most significant innovation. It had a conical shape, was made of brass and was inserted into the bolt chamber from the side facing the barrel, when the bolt by the action of the lever located under the receiver was lifted up by the cartridge chamber. Unlike modern cartridges, it had no ignition source, and this was its main drawback. Each cartridge had a small hole in the bottom, covered with wax. Therefore, for firing from the outside of the bolt, a standard fire tube was provided, on which a standard shock capsule was worn. This cartridge was innovative and effective, but was already obsolete by the end of the war, so no serious effort was made to continue the production of Burnside carbines after the end of hostilities.


The receiver of the Burnside carbine. Let's pay attention, first of all, to the bracket that controls the shutter. It, as can be clearly seen, consists of two levers. The first internal one is the shutter fuse. Without wringing it out, it was impossible to open the shutter. However, it was easily pushed down if it was pressed simultaneously with the lower lever, which, in fact, controlled the shutter. On the right, on the high tide, the bolt lock is held by a pin sticking out from under it. The hairpin is recessed, the lock goes down, and thus the bolt together with the levers is removed from the receiver


Top view of the bolt of the Burnside carbine

So, in 1856, Burnside designed his carbine, and in 1857 he already won the competition at West Point, being the best among 17 other models of carbine presented to him. The government immediately ordered 200 carbines, but this was too few, and Burnside, no longer hoping for success, sold his share of the patents and company to a certain Charles Jackson in 1858. The situation changed with the outbreak of the civil war, during which more than 55 carbines were ordered for the Union cavalrymen in five gradually improving versions.


The bolt of the carbine is open. It is clearly seen that the shutter itself consists of three parts in the form of metal bars: the base of the shutter, to which the control lever is attached, a block with a brandtube and a block with a chamber itself. The block with the brandtube is movable and when the shutter is closed it presses the block with the chamber. As a result, the cartridge fits tightly into the barrel, which excludes the breakthrough of gases, and the block with the brandtube is tightly pressed against the bottom of the cartridge, which eliminates the breakthrough of gases back



Burnside's 1863 patent for an improved carbine. U.S. Patent Office

Burnside carbines were initially quite expensive to manufacture. So, in 1861, the cost of one carbine was $ 35,75. But gradually, as the technology was developed, it decreased. So in 1864, one carbine cost only $ 19.


Burnside carbine M1864. Weight 3,2 kg. Length 1000 mm. National Museum of American History

Since the Burnside carbine was produced in the thousands, this made it the third most popular rifle in the Civil War; only Sharps and Spencer carbines were somewhat better known. And let's just say these carbines were spoken of as more modern and successful. But on the other hand, the "Burnside" fought longer, and besides, they were used in all theaters of war. And there were so many of them that many carbines were captured as trophies by the Confederates. In this case, the main thing that the shooters who used these carbines complained about was that his sleeve sometimes got stuck in the breech after a shot.


Burnside cartridges packaging. Department of History of Technology, History of the Armed Forces, National Museum of American History, Smithsonian Institution

Based on the data on applications for ammunition, it was calculated that in the period 1863-1864. Burnside carbines were in service with 43 Union cavalry regiments. In addition, in the same period of time, they were armed with cavalrymen of 7 cavalry regiments of the Confederate army, albeit not entirely, but at least partially ... Interestingly, for all its shortcomings, it was produced not only in the USA, but also in England until 1870, and in total, about 100000 of these carbines were produced!

There are five known examples of this carbine. But by the end of the Civil War, their production ceased, and the Burnside Rifle Company switched to the production of Spencer carbines.


The Spencer carbine was one of the most popular types of firearms in the Civil War, although it was only produced from the second half of 1863.

Its distinctive feature is that it had a magazine that could hold seven metal rimfire cartridges, which were fed into the breech of the bolt by a spring in the magazine. The store was loaded through the rifle butt. When the trigger guard was lowered, the breech was also lowered, and the spent cartridge case was thrown away. When the trigger guard returned to its original position, the bolt moved up, grabbed a new cartridge and inserted it into the breech. To speed up the loading process, the Blakeslee box was developed, which contained several loaded magazines that could be quickly inserted into the stock. In total, the federal government purchased more than 95 Spencer carbines during the war.

Another contemporary of the Burnside carbine and its enemy rival was the .52 caliber carbine constructed by Jerome H. Tarpley of Greensboro, North Carolina, who was granted a patent for it by the Confederate government in February 1863. It was produced by J.I.F. Garrett's company in Greensboro from 1863 to 1864. But Tarpley carbines were rare. Only a few hundred of them were made.


The appearance of the Tarplei carbine. Department of History of Technology, History of the Armed Forces, National Museum of American History, Smithsonian Institution

The carbine had a unique design dictated by military necessity. The receiver was of untreated brass. The barrel was blued and the hammer tempered. The shutter was thrown back to the left. The main drawback of the carbine was that it did not have any seal to prevent gas leakage between the bolt and the barrel when fired. The gases produced by the combustion of black powder are highly erosive. Therefore, with each shot, the gap between the bolt and the barrel increased, which, of course, did not add to its reliability. But it used conventional paper ammunition. Although the carbine was produced primarily for the army, it was also sold commercially. It is the only Confederate firearm sold to the general public during the war. Tarpley had an attractive appearance, but it should only be used by people with strong nerves!


Tarpley carbine bolt. Looking at him, I just want to exclaim: "Tin!"


Tarpley carbine bolt. Right view

Gilbert Smith, who lived in Buttermilk Falls, New York, was a physician. But, like many enthusiasts of the time, he showed a great interest in small arms. In the 50s of the XIX century, he filed a number of applications for breech-loading small arms, and, like Burnside, he began by inventing a new cartridge with a rubber sheath.


Smith's cavalry carbine. Department of History of Technology, History of the Armed Forces, National Museum of American History, Smithsonian Institution


Gilbert Smith patrons

Well, his research ended with the fact that in 1857 he designed a carbine of a very elegant, if I may say so, design. It weighed 3,4 kg, had a total length of 1000 mm and a barrel length of 550 mm. Caliber .50 Smith. The carbine belonged to the type of "breakage", that is, shotguns with barrels that fold back for loading. But the barrel lock, shaped like a steel spring plate with a hole in the back, was right above the barrel! In front of the trigger was a "pusher", pressing on which raised the plate, the barrel was lowered, and its charging chamber opened. Simple and technological. However, at first the carbine also cost 35 dollars (1859), which is why it was not accepted for service. But the war changed everything. In 1861, the price fell to $ 32,5, and the government began to purchase Smith carbines. They were armed with 11 cavalry regiments of the northerners, and a total of 30062 units were released! The most important problem was the cartridge. Yes, it did not get wet, but it was not always convenient to remove it from the chamber, and besides, it caused misfires at the carbine.


Smith carbine M1857 with open chamber. The barrel lock and two square locking lugs for the hole on the lock are clearly visible: one on the barrel itself and the other on the bolt carrier. A pusher rod is visible behind, relieving the constipation

James Greene patented the unusual design of his breech-loading carbine back in 1854 and suggested that it be manufactured by the Massachusetts Arms Company of Chicopee Falls. He managed to sell 300 carbines to the US military. However, field trials in 1857 showed that they were too awkward for riders to use. Nevertheless, the British military placed a larger order on them, apparently intending to equip Cape Town's mounted riflemen with them.


Green's carbine М1857. Caliber .54. Department of History of Technology, History of the Armed Forces, National Museum of American History, Smithsonian Institution

British carbines had 18-inch barrels (American - 22-inch), but were otherwise identical to American guns. Green used a locking system in which the barrel rotates 90 degrees and is fixed by two large lugs in the locking grooves on the frame of the weapon. In this case, the barrel was spring-loaded and rotated on a guide rod located under it. Well, in order to make it convenient to rotate it, it has a faceted section located behind the sight. The cartridge is paper or linen, and in the center of the bolt a conical needle with a channel inside was provided, piercing the base of the cartridge when the bolt is closed. This needle directs the flow of gases directly into the powder charge of the cartridge, which, of course, was a rational decision. Two triggers shouldn't be surprised. The first trigger actually released the barrel stopper.


Green's carbine in loading position

The British spent several years testing ammunition for Green's carbines, but they could not find a material that was comfortable enough to pierce it with a bolt needle, but at the same time durable for use in the field. They were eventually destroyed or sold and never used in combat.


Cartridge bag for the Burnside carbine. Missouri Historical Museum


During the Civil War in the United States, the cavalry was armed with many types of small arms: 1 - the Smith carbine of .52 caliber (13,2 mm), 2 - the Starr carbine of .54 caliber (13,7 mm), 3 - the carbine "Jocelyn" caliber .52 (13,2 mm), 4 - carbine "Burnside" caliber .54 (13,7 mm), 5 - carbine "Maynard" caliber .50 (12,7 mm). Figure: L. I. F. Funkenov

As for Ambrose Burnside himself, he did climb the ranks and became a general, most likely precisely because his carbine was very well known. President Lincoln repeatedly demanded that he take command of the Union Army of the Potomac. And Burnside constantly refused him and honestly declared that he could not command such a large army. When in the end he was persuaded to do so, his command led to defeat at the Battle of Fredericksburg. Burnside's officers then began to complain about his incompetence to the White House and the War Department. And it all ended with the fact that he was put on trial, which accused him of a number of failures, but then he was acquitted, although he lost his general rank. But he went down in history with his carbine and sideburns!
67 comments
Information
Dear reader, to leave comments on the publication, you must sign in.
  1. +12
    13 September 2020 05: 35
    It seems you know a lot, read a lot many times, but you still catch yourself in moments of your ignorance! Thank you Vyacheslav Olegovich for the kind article for breakfast !!!
    Guys and girls all a good day, with respect, your cat !!!
    1. +5
      13 September 2020 06: 24
      You already have an article with pictures!
      1. +3
        13 September 2020 09: 28
        Thank you very much!!!!!
    2. +4
      13 September 2020 06: 25
      I see you have the first minus. Is politeness so out of favor with us?
      1. +10
        13 September 2020 06: 43
        Quote: kalibr
        I see you have the first minus. Is politeness so out of favor with us?

        someone just from an overabundance of feelings ..
        1. +2
          13 September 2020 11: 59
          No, ethno truncated from indigestion and, as a result, from an overabundance of not feelings, but waste. laughing
          1. +4
            13 September 2020 12: 05
            And brain atrophy. Count it up, Uncle Kostya, this creature was not too lazy this morning to retrospectively run through my comments 10 days ago and stick the cons. laughing
            1. +3
              13 September 2020 12: 07
              Stunned, and not too lazy. laughing There is in this some kind of unhealthy interest in your person.
              1. +4
                13 September 2020 12: 11
                I think not only to mine. Only, this scarecrow did not read the rules of the site, by which such actions are prohibited and punishable by "eternal account ban". There were precedents.
                1. +1
                  13 September 2020 12: 14
                  You can't catch it here, but he, Tihar, does not openly communicate, this is not a "simple soul" for you, Golovan, who did not cost anything to provoke himself into insults.
                  1. +3
                    13 September 2020 12: 20
                    And then there is no need to catch. Just write to the administration of the resource, it is their job to support the rules they have established.
                    1. +3
                      13 September 2020 12: 22
                      But why write there, let him ... he himself will die of an ulcer, such do not live long, not here, so in a neighboring pub on the tabla will work. laughing
                      1. +8
                        13 September 2020 17: 47
                        "These" always have time to give birth before the rat poison takes effect.
                      2. 0
                        13 September 2020 18: 10
                        Stupidity, it is not only contagious, but also inherited.
                      3. +8
                        13 September 2020 18: 15
                        So they have enough of the simplest functionality. "Minus" learned to push - everything, "in the kitchen" took. A kind of "ball" in a modern manner.
                      4. +1
                        13 September 2020 18: 20
                        Under the patronage of "Shvonders". laughing
                      5. +9
                        13 September 2020 18: 22
                        "Shvonders" are already those who know how to bomb the shameful "Complaint" button. laughing
            2. +1
              16 September 2020 17: 51
              Good afternoon. It only says that the person is working. How can ... hmm
      2. +5
        13 September 2020 08: 08
        This is some kind of alternatively gifted ghoul compensates for the unsatisfied PTSD. It was the same yesterday.
        Thank you, Vyacheslav Olegovich!
  2. +7
    13 September 2020 07: 22
    How long was the path to the cartridge case, primer, bullet so familiar to us ... In the forms they are now.
    Thank you, Vyacheslav Olegovich for the article.
  3. +9
    13 September 2020 10: 52
    Thank you, Vyacheslav Olegovich. I never even heard of Smith and rubber cartridges.
    1. +6
      13 September 2020 11: 57
      Quote: Icelord
      I never even heard of Smith and rubber cartridges.

      Will be detailed ...
      1. 0
        13 September 2020 18: 46
        thanks in advance!!! and in Europe at this time what was happening interesting ??? well in this area of ​​course
        1. +2
          13 September 2020 18: 50
          Damir! Here was my cycle of RIFLE BY COUNTRIES AND CONTINENTS. About all rifles and carbines in Europe, America, Asia ... 25 articles. Take a look at the profile ... It's just that there is something like a repetition on a deeper level. So you have to look at what was there so as NOT TO REPEAT!
          1. +1
            13 September 2020 18: 53
            many thanks!!! unfortunately, as always, the most interesting thing passes by, BUT !!! we will make up
  4. +8
    13 September 2020 11: 49

    Ambrose Everett Burnside went down in history with another invention, which is much more famous and popular than his carbine - his facial hair. This style was originally called burnsides.
    After some time, the name was transformed into sideburns - sideburns in the style of General Burnside. True, the Austrians believe that the first to propose this style was Emperor Franz Joseph.
    1. +2
      13 September 2020 15: 04
      But what about our Pushkin !!! laughing
      1. +4
        13 September 2020 16: 23
        And what about Pushkin? Pushkin is "our everything"! But in terms of "furry" is much inferior to Burnside. request
  5. +7
    13 September 2020 12: 03
    Vyacheslav, thanks! hi I promised about the carbine - and here's the article, I didn't have to wait long. smile
    The carabiner Tarplei simply touched, had never met this model before. It is somewhat reminiscent of children's rifles for the heirs to the throne in tsarist Russia.
    1. +6
      13 September 2020 12: 09
      It is always painful to wait and catch up. I know from myself how unpleasant it is. I had to hurry ...
      1. +7
        13 September 2020 12: 10
        But the article GOT, and this is the most important thing. smile
  6. +1
    13 September 2020 12: 46
    I did not understand the idea of ​​either lubricating grease, or even more so about lubricating grease that protects the barrel from powder gases.
    Firstly, the very idea of ​​liquid lubrication sprayed with powder gases looks inoperative, the fat will simply burn without residue during the spraying process, much like ecofuel on rapeseed or sunflower oil in a diesel engine. Second, what is its protective function? "Liquefy" carbon deposits? We will get a more chemically active liquid electrolyte, corrosion will only increase.
    It seems that this is a copy-paste from a patent, without the slightest attempt at comprehension, clearly illustrating the gloomy twists and turns of the design thought of the pioneers.
    1. +3
      13 September 2020 16: 02
      I can't say anything about this. I only know that on the first colts with a removable drum, it was recommended to fill the bullet in the drum with a mixture of lard and paraffin, or cover it with "cannon / rifle lard".
      1. +3
        13 September 2020 20: 12
        These revolvers had a "horse" gap between the barrel and the drum, and the escaping gases quite often ignited gunpowder in the adjacent chambers. To prevent this misfortune, the chambers were covered with wax.
  7. +5
    13 September 2020 12: 54
    During the Civil War in the United States, the cavalry was armed with many types of small arms:
    Not so much - seven. To those listed in the figure, add a Merrill carbine and a Remington Type 1 “Split Breech” Carbine.

    1. 0
      15 September 2020 20: 29
      Yours is not true. There were more than a dofig of them. Colt m 1855, Maynard m 1851, Gallagher m1866, Hall North m 1843. And another 100500 models))
      1. +1
        15 September 2020 20: 34
        We read carefully the previous comment: "During the Civil War in the United States, the cavalry was armed ..."
        That is, not "how many carbines were in the United States in those years," but "in service with the cavalry." Trophies, purchased, picked up in the forest are not counted.
        1. 0
          15 September 2020 20: 37
          It was in service, for example, the Hall North carbine was armed with the American Dragoon Regiment
          1. 0
            15 September 2020 20: 40
            All the models I have indicated, and many not indicated, were purchased by the US Army in tangible quantities
          2. 0
            15 September 2020 20: 58
            It was in service, for example, the Hall North carbine was armed with the American Dragoon Regiment
            In what years?
            1. 0
              15 September 2020 21: 05
              By the beginning of the civil war. Of course, to the very beginning, for 30 years in service. But this is the oldest sample, all the others I indicated were also purchased centrally
              1. 0
                15 September 2020 21: 58
                During the Civil War, over fifty different types of carbines were manufactured. But what exactly the dragoons used Hall North did not see an unambiguous source.
                1. 0
                  15 September 2020 23: 20
                  The very humor is that I just now remembered that Vyacheslav Olegovich had already written about them))) Sorry, honestly, I just did not pay attention. I just remembered that there was still a speculation scandal with them
                2. 0
                  15 September 2020 23: 30
                  Good source, Carl Russell's book "Guns, Muskets and Pistols of the New World"
                  1. 0
                    15 September 2020 23: 38
                    As for me, Civil War Firearms: Their Historical Background and Tactical Use is better in this matter.
                    1. 0
                      16 September 2020 01: 32
                      It's still more convenient to read in Russian. And the paintings of Fritz Kredel where the dragoons with Hall-North are depicted are not there))
  8. +2
    13 September 2020 15: 48
    I wonder why it was vyyzhivatsya with this weapon, when the Winchester Rifles were walking. They certainly didn’t leave anyone a chance.
    1. +4
      13 September 2020 15: 57
      It was believed that they are EXPENSIVE and UNSUITABLE FOR SERVICE IN THE ARMY. Look: a cowboy was making $ 30 a day, just like a soldier. And the Winchester costs 80 ... It's not for nothing that they nicknamed it "sovereign". What the hell ?! And then the military believed that he had a weak cartridge.
      1. +4
        13 September 2020 16: 15
        Rather, the military, as always, the question arose, and not a lot of ammunition soldiers will spend, and suddenly he stops aiming. Until now. Damn snipers.
      2. +3
        13 September 2020 16: 28
        Eeee ... Vyacheslav Olegovich, like cowboys, in the classical sense of the term, did not exist in the decade described.
        1. +4
          13 September 2020 16: 36
          But already in the 70s they were. And it was then that the army refused to buy winchesters in favor of springfield carbines (single-shot), and Smith and Wesson refused to use revolvers, preferring the Colt-73 not to self-cocking.
      3. +4
        13 September 2020 18: 30
        Well, not a day, but rather a month. And so a Kalash costs about 1000-1200 bucks, a contract soldier gets 400 bucks. Nafig such weapons are expensive, you need to switch to metal sticks. laughing
        1. +3
          13 September 2020 19: 32
          Of course a month. Wrong. $ 1 a day, but the cook - $ 2!
      4. 0
        15 September 2020 20: 33
        Some colonels used their own money to buy Henry carbines for their soldiers. This is the first Winchester. When Winchester bought the patent, he simply renamed it
        1. 0
          15 September 2020 20: 45
          Yes, exactly so, but that first winchester was very much to load, although it included 15 rounds!
          1. 0
            15 September 2020 20: 51
            And the rifle cartridge is still rather weak. 44.40 seems
  9. +4
    13 September 2020 20: 43
    Not a bad review. Thanks to the author of course! And some kind of perverted carbine, you need to push the cartridge backwards into the feeder. It gives off a strong oblique look from Hall's gun, which is also strange in layout.

    The most interesting of the first, in my opinion, is the Sharps carbine. Especially with the capsule store. Not paper-tape, but with separate feeding of capsules to the shelf. Such a scheme will work even with a silicon lock; it is enough to use cups of pulp instead of capsules, as in artillery.
  10. +3
    13 September 2020 20: 44
    Well, yes .... The American Civil War fell on the "era of historic change"! The era is very interesting and difficult! (It is not for nothing that when the Chinese wanted to "maternal" someone, they wanted to live in that very ... "era of change" ...!) Indeed, in this American period there appeared "many" exotic time of weapon systems! But all this "set" can be divided into several "types" ... such as one group - the weapon of the breaking system; the other is hinged chamber valves ... the third is vertical slide valves ... and so on! As for the cartridges, with the apparent "abundance" of ,, varieties ,, it is also enough to single out “one or two” ,, categories ,, ... If the maximum is “shirshe”, then this is: 1. "paper" cartridge; 2. "metal" cartridge; 3. "rubber" cartridge ... 4. "nipple" cartridge ...! Of particular interest is such a "category" as "charge in a cartridge"! ... In general, it was interesting to live, it was interesting to fight! I went on the attack ... and you don't know from what and with what they will shoot you! belay
    1. +1
      15 September 2020 20: 44
      Quote: Nikolaevich I
      I went on the attack ... and you don't know from what and with what they will shoot you!

      Soon I will write about one completely unique revolver of that time ... its creator has already thought of it ...
      1. +1
        15 September 2020 20: 50
        Quote: kalibr
        completely unique revolver of that time

        Intrigued! Now I think: I know about this, or not! I'm looking forward to! hi
        1. +1
          15 September 2020 21: 08
          I intrigued myself at first. Found in US Patent Office documents. Well, another Colt ... But for something they gave a patent, right? Enlarged the image, peered ... mama-mia, miracle of wonders, you will not regret it when you see!
      2. 0
        17 September 2020 09: 19
        In my opinion, the most amazing is Le Ma's revolver, with a shot barrel
        1. +1
          17 September 2020 10: 52
          I thought so too, dear Igor, until I found the one I was about to write about ... Wait!
          1. 0
            17 September 2020 11: 08
            Look forward to. Thank you in advance
  11. +3
    14 September 2020 00: 05
    Very interesting article. In fiction came across:
    Spencer's rifle, Smith's carbine, but had a vague idea of ​​what it was.
    1. +1
      15 September 2020 20: 42
      Well, now you can imagine it as if you were holding them in your hands!
  12. 0
    21 September 2020 21: 25
    Thank you! Very interesting!