Why Night Hunter Loses to Longbow

368


We are accustomed to believe that our helicopters are among the best in the world, and some of them have no equal at all. However, as we know, as a result of a long-term tender, the Indian Ministry of Defense ultimately decided to purchase American Ap-64D helicopters Apache Longbow (“Longbow” from English - “Longbow”), and not Russian Mi- 28HNE "Night Hunter". Is "Apache" superior to our "Mi"? Let's try to figure it out.

It is known that electronic equipment has become an important part of helicopter armament. The effectiveness of reconnaissance and control greatly depends on it. weapons. The beginning of the creation of the Mi-28HE helicopter was a response of the Soviet Union to the appearance of the American Apache helicopter. It should be recalled that the completion of work on the Mi-28HE fell on the period of Russian reforms, when the backlog of our country from the West in electronic, micro- and nano-electronic, as well as computer technologies continued to increase. Today, none of the created models of Russian weapons can not be provided for 100% elements of domestic production. The backward element base causes an increase in the mass, dimensions of the apparatus and its insufficient efficiency and reliability.

Let us consider which combat characteristics of the Apache helicopters forced the Indian Defense Ministry to purchase them.

EXPORT DIGNITY AN-64D "APACH LONGBOU"


The on-board radio-electronic equipment (avionics) of the Apache helicopter and the homing heads of various modifications of the Hellfire missile were developed under conditions of a high level of development of radio-electronic and other technologies. The Hellfire anti-tank guided missile (ATGM) was constantly upgraded and went from a second-generation missile (AGM-114A) from a semi-active laser seeker to a third-generation missile (AGM-114B) using a radar (HL) GPS.

When creating an ATGM complex for the Apache, the task was to significantly reduce the time the helicopter was under enemy sighting when hitting missiles thanks to highly intelligent avionics and the ability to launch a salvo launch of long-range missiles using armored vehicles.

The main advantage of the Apache Longbow helicopter avionics is that by the time the helicopter reaches the optimum height for salvo firing, targets are already determined in order of importance and the missiles are aimed at them. The avionics of the American helicopter, having the ability to determine the differences between anti-aircraft complexes and wheeled vehicles, as well as other targets, significantly increases the survivability of the Apache on the battlefield.

The onboard electronic equipment "Apache Longbow" provides: automatic detection of fixed and mobile targets at the maximum firing range; identification and determination of the degree of importance of each goal in five classes (classifies and allocates priority); tracking of targets, the coordinates of which are relative to the helicopter are transmitted to the rocket, if it is located outside the capture zone by the homing head; the transfer of the exact coordinates of the detected targets to other helicopters, strike aircraft or ground points.

The tandem warhead (warhead) of the Hellfire rocket due to the imperfection of the Russian dynamic defense (DZ) design tanks (the length of the DZ element is 250 mm) has a probability of overcoming it of 0,8–0,9 and armor penetration of 1000 mm, which ensures a high probability of damage to armored vehicles.

The high level of development of electronics allows the US DoD to start adopting a fourth-generation universal universal JAGM ATGM from the 2016 for installation on various ground forces, air force and naval forces. The new missile installed on the Apache will have an 16 km firing range, which will significantly increase the effectiveness of hitting enemy tanks (the firing range of ATGM from aircraft - to 28 km). As a result, thanks to the long-range JAGM missile firing range, the helicopter does not enter the enemy's short-range attack zone.

This ATGM has the following main tactical and technical characteristics: armor penetration - 1200 mm, type of warhead - cumulative tandem / high-explosive fragmentation, type of guidance system - inertial, digital autopilot and multi-mode homing, type of propulsion system - RTDT, launch weight of the rocket - 52 kg , rocket length - 1,72 m, rocket body diameter - 0,178 m.

INSUFFICIENT LIFE

The Mi-28HE helicopter is designed to engage ground and air targets. In the reference editions are listed components of the avionics of this machine. But for some reason there is no assessment of the conformity of the appearance of the avionics with the functional purpose of the attack helicopter. Particular attention in this regard deserves the analysis of the process of destruction of armored vehicles and other ground targets using the “Attack” anti-personnel missile system, which forms the basis of the Mi-28HE ammunition. In this case, to control the rocket, a semi-automatic guidance method is used, in which the gunner holds the sight on the target, and the guidance system automatically leads the rocket to it. The coordinates of the rocket relative to the sighting line are determined using the optical system (located on the Mi-28HE) and the tracer mounted on the rocket. The control commands from the helicopter are transmitted to the rocket by radio.

ATGM “Attack” has the following main characteristics: rocket mass - 42,5 kg, mass transport and launch container with a rocket - 48,5 kg, rocket diameter - 130 mm, firing range - 6000 m, average flight speed - 400 m / s, warhead - tandem, rod, SLM (volume-detonating mixture), warhead weight - 7,4 kg, armor penetration - 800 mm, probability of overcoming the built-in DZ 500 mm long - 0,5.

The use of the Attack ATGM is extremely dangerous, since the total time for a visual search for a ground target and a missile control is longer than the response time of modern air defense systems. Reaction time is understood as the time from the detection of a helicopter to the launch of an anti-aircraft missile from a launcher, which for a short-range anti-aircraft missile system (ZRPK) is 4 – 10 с. The Mi-28HE is most susceptible when firing at a range of 4 – 6 km, which requires an increase in flight altitude to ensure reliable visual contact with the target. With the price of the helicopter equal to the price of 3 – 4 tanks, it is doubtful that the Mi-28HE with the second-generation anti-tank systems will solve the problem of destroying targets, taking into account the cost-effectiveness criterion.

In relation to the solution of a particular combat mission, 7 variants of the Mi-28NE ammunition are provided, consisting of various combinations of obsolete ammunition: ATRA ATGM, Igla anti-aircraft guided missiles (SAM), and unguided aviation missiles (NAR) S-8 and S-13, as well as shots to the 30 mm cannon 2A42. The “Attack” missile can be equipped with either a cumulative tandem warhead for hitting armored vehicles, or a rod for hitting air targets, or a warhead equipped with a volume-detonating mixture to hit ground targets.

In fact, the Attack ATGM is a modernized version of the second-generation Sturm missile. But today it is unacceptable to equip expensive second-generation attack helicopters and anti-aircraft missiles of the second generation. Only the installation of third-generation anti-tank guided missile systems and modern avionics will improve the efficiency of helicopter armament.

The 2А42 helicopter gun has a mass twice that of the Apache helicopter’s M230 gun, and the ammunition of the latter is almost three times that of our helicopter, all with the same caliber. Note that if the M-230 gun was specially designed for the Apache helicopter, the 2-42 was “borrowed” from the BMP-2.

The results of the comparison of weapons and avionics of the Mi-28HE and AN-64D helicopters are not in our favor.

The Igla anti-aircraft missile system was put into service in the 1983 year. The probability of hitting a fighter with a single anti-aircraft Igla guided missile equipped with a thermal homing head is 0,4 – 0,6. The speed of the fighter should not exceed 300 m / s. When shooting targets for thermal noise, the probability of their being hit by one missile defense will be 0,2 – 0,3.

Uncontrolled C-8 aircraft missile (maximum firing range - 4 km) with a cumulative fragmentation warhead has armor penetration 400 mm, which is sufficient for effective destruction of unarmored and lightly armored vehicles. But Mi-28HE using this weapon can be shot down not only by short-range air defense systems, but also as a result of shelling by portable anti-aircraft missile systems ("Stinger", "Mistral") that are in the battle formations of the enemy.

The media notes that the Mi-28НЭ has a high level of combat survivability, the crew cabin of which is fully armored. But is it really? Anything that flies cannot have a serious reservation. What kind of reservation can we talk about when small arms are capable of disabling rotary-winged cars? For example, the 12,7-mm armor-piercing and incendiary bullet (index 7БЗ-1) penetrates the armor with a thickness 20 mm at a distance of 1500 m. At the same time, the crew’s armored box is made of 10-mm aluminum alloy sheets on which ceramic tiles are glued. This design can save the crew from bullets caliber 7,62 mm.

The main drawback of the Mi-28HE is obsolete weapons, unable to hit targets without entering the enemy's short-range air defense system. These helicopters in the ranks of the army aviation are unlikely to make a significant contribution to the aviation support of the Ground Forces.

INFORMATION TO THOUGHT


The meeting of the State Commission, chaired by Air Force Commander Alexander Zelin, at which a decision was made to adopt the Mi-28HE helicopter, took place on the last days of the 2008 of the year. It should be noted that the creation of this machine lasted 30 years. A year before this event, the article “Peculiarities of military scientific research on the substantiation of the concepts and appearance of promising aviation complexes” appeared in the journal “Military Thought” (No. 8 for 2007 year), prepared by a team of authors: Colonel Ph.D. A.L. Gusev, Lieutenant Colonel Ph.D. A.K. Denisenko, Colonel Dr. of Sc. Vs Platunov. In this work, a great deal of attention at the initial stage of the creation of aviation complexes (AK), including helicopters, was paid to military-scientific research related to the substantiation of the concepts, looks and requirements for the promising and modernized AK. It can be assumed that after this article there was no instruction to carry out work on the basis of the modernization of the Mi-28HNE to substantiate the new weapons and the avionics, which would really correspond to the new attack helicopter. It is puzzling that this article, being a breakthrough in the AK methodology, turned out to be unused in relation to the Mi-28H helicopter.

The Mi-28HE helicopter was intended mainly for the defeat of American tanks. But the Americans actively improved the armored vehicles, as a result of which modifications from the M1 to the M1А1, М1А2, М1А2 SEP appeared. To date, thousands of tanks have been upgraded. For example, a Mi-28HE helicopter is completely useless to fire an MkNUMXA1 SEP tank with an Attack missile, which is equipped with a highly effective active protection system. Modernization of the Abrams should end in 2 year.

It must be assumed that the creators of the Mi-28HE did not follow the modernization of foreign armored vehicles and did not carry out adequate technical measures. This is evidenced by the fact that the tactical and technical tasks and tactical and technical requirements issued to the creators of the Mi-28HE in the 1978 year, through the 30 years needed to be clarified. But that did not happen.

What did the Americans achieve by winning the tender, where the attack helicopters were presented? They strengthened the Indian army "Apache" to fight with Chinese tanks. This is a review of the US policy of containing China. Following this event, the Apache helicopter base will be organized, where American instructors will be able to conduct training sessions on helicopter materiel and piloting. Ammunition storage facilities and helicopter repair shops will be equipped.

Russia for a long time gave up its place in India in attack helicopters, which harmed the Mi-28HE brand. This situation requires disassembly and adoption of appropriate decisions in order to prevent a crisis in the creation of domestic attack helicopters.
368 comments
Information
Dear reader, to leave comments on the publication, you must sign in.
  1. +1
    April 28 2017 22: 18
    It is stupid to worry that India has not purchased our helicopters, because if you carefully analyze the facts, then our helicopters were created on the blood of Russian pilots, through trial and error in real combat conditions. And helicopters for the most part in the United States are equipment for the war with the Papuans. Therefore, you should not draw conclusions ahead of time, because as practice and life have shown, our tanks are just as better than American ones, even without air conditioning and toilet paper. Just like our planes are still outperforming American ones in training battles or demonstrations. And I don’t even need to talk about ships and submarines. After all, it is a known historical fact that it was Rus' and the Russians who began trading iron when Europe first began to use bronze.
  2. 0
    6 May 2017 21: 15
    One thing is clear: without boosting the economy and developing industry, including electronics, Russia is doomed. The complex of moral qualities of the Soviet man in Russia is replaced by a golden calf introduced like a “Trojan Horse” by our enemy. Now the availability of finance determines the success of any project, and when the economy is in devastation, it is very difficult to stimulate the activities of specialists with sheer necessity.
  3. 0
    14 May 2017 17: 04
    “The tandem warhead (warhead) of the Hellfire missile due to the imperfection of the dynamic protection (DZ) design of Russian tanks” and “For example, it is completely useless for the Mi-28NE helicopter to fire the Ataka missile at the M1A2 SEP tank, on which a highly effective active protection complex is installed” is apparently in the author's wet dreams? The author modestly apparently kept silent about the fact that the 2A42 cannon is more powerful than the M230. This is so by the way, whether this power is needed with good missiles is another question; simply when describing a weapon you cannot talk about one thing and keep silent about another. And the fact that the Mi-28 will destroy the same cart, infantry fighting vehicle, armored personnel carrier from a distance of 3-4 km with the help of a cannon, and the Apache will spend a missile that is 5 times more expensive than these targets.
  4. 0
    3 October 2017 14: 36
    Allow me your 5 cents...
    According to Wikipedia
    https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Joint_Air-to-Ground
    _Missile
    JAGM will have a firing range of 5 miles (8 km)
    Semi-automatic laser guidance system + millimeter wave radar.
    BUT! In 2012, the KMP abandoned this program. Deliveries are expected to begin in 2018...
    I think that the author is somewhat incorrectly comparing the advantages of weapons that will only be
    with what we have...
  5. +1
    8 October 2017 11: 36
    absolutely true material. Well, a country where there is no PRODUCTION, where science has been destroyed, where there is no electronic base... cannot produce a modern product!!! All that a clear example is capable of is TAZakh
  6. +1
    10 November 2017 14: 42
    The article is a concoction of fact and fiction. Titanium armored capsules are used to armor the cabin, and the glazing of the Mi-28 can withstand DShK. Another thing is that not the entire helicopter is armored and it can be shot down, but on the American Apache there is no armored glass at all and its crew can be shot from a shotgun if you get within firing range... As for missiles, yes, missiles with a semi-active homing head are outdated, but this issue is already being resolved. In the USA and Ukraine they like to talk about the supposed invulnerability of their tanks, but in reality they burn like candles, along with the vaunted German Leopard-2.
  7. 0
    14 November 2017 15: 31
    Without having your own microelectronics production, what can you dream about? 10-20 years behind? 50. Minimum.
  8. 0
    15 November 2017 00: 11
    "What kind of armor can we talk about when small arms are capable of disabling rotary-wing aircraft."
    It is better for the author to compile collections of jokes. Much the same can be said about the Abrams: what kind of tank is it that is disabled by a primitive grenade launcher from 60 years ago? wink
    As they say, “wherever you go” wink
    Especially for Mikhail Rastopshin: the choice of weapons, especially foreign-made, is associated not only with performance characteristics, but also with other circumstances that cannot be exchanged for a ruble.
    Whether “Night Stalker” loses to the American can only be verified in a real battle, and everything else is verbiage.
  9. 0
    25 November 2017 08: 46
    After the line: “... as a result of a tender held by the Indian Ministry of Defense, a decision was made to purchase...” there was no need to read further! In my opinion, only polar bears do not know how Indians make decisions “based on the results of tenders.” In this country, everything is done under the influence of lobbyists and the immutable rule of “don’t put all your eggs in one basket.”
    And regarding the given performance characteristics about the supposed “electronic” superiority of the Apache, this is rather a disadvantage! In a modern war, with the use of super-effective electronic warfare systems, all these American Pentiums will fall from the sky like overripe apples!