Many barrels - many bullets

26
Since the advent of firearms weapons its designers tried to increase the rate of fire, tk. almost immediately the advantages of massive fire became clear. For quite a long time, the rate of fire was increased indirectly: by training the shooter. But no matter how you train a soldier, the rate of fire will not increase significantly. Some idea was needed to improve the design of weapons. One of the very first and simple ideas was to equip the gun with several barrels.

Volley from Europe

The first samples of such systems appeared more than five centuries ago. But loading from the muzzle, without detracting from the density of fire, had a bad effect on the overall rate of fire. As a result, the overall effectiveness of the weapon was not much higher than that of individual shooters. The idea with several trunks had to be postponed for the time being.

Many barrels - many bullets

Austro-Hungarian mitrailleuse Montigny, 1870 model. Numbers indicate 1 - reloading lever, 2 - magazine, 3 - chamber


The time of multi-barrel systems came only in the middle of the 1851th century. In 1859, the Belgian Montigny made a gun with a block of gun barrels loaded from the breech. The recently appeared unitary cartridges also turned out to be very useful. They were easy to load into special clips that looked like a metal plate with holes. The clip was inserted into the breech of the installation and all the cartridges were fired at the same time. Due to the clip, in comparison with the guns of the XV century, the rate of fire has increased significantly. Already in XNUMX, this model was adopted in France under the name "mitralise". In Russia, this word was translated literally - gambler. However, the bullets flew in a small "flock" and the area of ​​​​damage was low. It happened that one enemy soldier managed to "catch" several pieces of lead at once. Dispersion reached acceptable values ​​only at very large distances, where the energy of the bullets was reduced to unacceptable values. Another problem with the first mitrailleuses was the simultaneous firing of all barrels. On later models, ammunition was saved by firing several rows of barrels in turn. But even with this innovation, the card players did not receive much fame. The fact is that the French did not bother to develop tactics for their use, and simply put them on the battlefield in rows, almost “anywhere”, and not in potentially dangerous areas.

barrel organ of death

Overseas, in the United States of America, at that time, the doctor R. J. Gatling was working on his brainchild. He also decided to use several barrels, but not for firing in volleys. If a cartridge has to be loaded into the barrel, then it fires, and then the cartridge case must be ejected ... Why not make several barrels, each of which is loaded and ejects the cartridge case while others are firing? That's what Gatling thought. The result of his inventions was an easel apparatus with six barrels. The shooter, like on a barrel organ, twisted the handle in the breech of the weapon, setting the block of barrels in motion. Cartridges from a box magazine at the top of the gun were fed under their own weight into the chambers. For each turn of the block, each individual barrel managed to receive a cartridge, shoot and eject the sleeve. The extraction of spent cartridges, it is worth noting, was also carried out due to gravity. It is necessary to make a reservation: the very idea of ​​​​a rotating block of the barrel was not new, by that time multiply-charged pepperbox-type revolvers already existed. The main merit of Gatling is the cartridge supply system and the distribution of the loading-shot-extraction cycle during the rotation of the block.


The main components of R. Gatling's shotguns: 1 - bore, 2 - rotating magazine, 3 - chamber, 4 - axis of rotation of the barrels


The original Gatling gun was patented in 1862 and adopted by the Army of the North in 1866. The first models could fire up to 200 rounds per minute. Later, using gears, it was possible to bring the rate of fire to almost a thousand shots. Since the source of energy was external (for the then Gatling gun - a person), the machine gun fired as long as there were cartridges in the magazine, until a misfire occurred or a cartridge jammed in the barrel. Later, an automatic weapon with an external drive would be called a mechanized automatic. But before this name there were still several decades.

At the end of the 2500th century, attempts were made to “wean” a person from turning the handle and replace him with an electric motor. But at that time, the electrical components had such dimensions that no 3000-XNUMX rounds per minute, to which they accelerated the machine gun, could give them a start in life. In addition, the notorious H. Maxim has already launched his much more mobile machine gun on the market, the maximum rate of fire of which was at the level of the first Gatling devices. Gradually, multi-barreled machine guns were removed from service, and then they were completely forgotten.

One hundred years after Dr. Gatling

In the middle of the XNUMXth century, weapons with a high rate of fire were again required. In particular, it required aviation and air defense: they now had to fight with such fast targets that the rate of fire even at one and a half thousand could not be enough. It was possible, of course, to use developments on machine guns like UltraShKAS (about 3000 rounds per minute), but its caliber was insufficient, and it was not profitable to rework the design for other cartridges. Another factor that prevented designers from overclocking the classic scheme was in temperatures. One barrel heats up during continuous firing, and, having gained a certain temperature, it can collapse. Of course, before that, ballistics will drastically deteriorate due to deformation. This is where the Gatling system came in handy. There was already experience with overclocking it to two or three thousand shots, which, together with new alloys for barrels, looked encouraging.


Six-barreled gun "Volcano"


Experiments were going on in many countries, but the first serial model of the "new" Gatling guns was the American M61 Vulcan. Designed in 1949, it had six 20mm barrels with a hydraulic block drive. The Vulkan has two firing modes - 4 and 6 thousand rounds per minute. The design allowed more, but there were concerns about the stable behavior of the cartridge belt links. Therefore, the new modification of the M61A1 gun received generally linkless ammunition. Even six thousand shots were enough to make the Vulcan cannon the standard weapon for American fighters for many years to come.

Later in the United States, several more samples of Gatling Guns will be created under a different cartridge and with a different drive. The smallest caliber was in an experimental machine gun with an electric drive XM214 Microgun of the 70s - 5,56 mm; the largest - also in the experimental T249 Vigilante of the 56th year - 37 mm.



In the Soviet Union, too, they did not ignore weapons with a rotating block of barrels. Back in 1939 I.I. Slostin made his eight-barreled 7,62 mm machine gun. For a number of reasons (heavy weight and damp design), he did not go into series, but some developments were used later. Work on multi-barrel systems was resumed in the early 60s, when the fleet ordered a six-barreled gun of 30 mm caliber from gunsmiths. Thanks to the Tula KBP and designers V.P. Gryazev and A.G. Shipunov, the sailors received the AK-630 ship anti-aircraft gun, a little later, the GSH-6-30 aircraft gun will be created on its basis. This gun had a rate of fire of 4-5 thousand rds / min, which, together with the caliber, was more than enough to destroy most of the targets that fighters work with. Almost simultaneously with the 30 mm cannon, a smaller caliber gun GSh-6-23 (23 mm) was created. It was already originally an aircraft gun with a rate of fire of up to nine thousand shots. Both Tula weapons, GSh-6-30 and GSh-6-23, have a gas engine for rotating the barrel block, but differ in the starter: on the first gun it is pneumatic, on the second it is pyrotechnic.


GSH-6-23



GShG


In the late 60s, work began on multi-barreled machine guns. These were four-barreled GShG (Tula KBP) chambered for 7,62x54R, giving up to 6 thousand rounds per minute and YakB-12.7 (TsKIB, designers P.G. Yakushev and B.A. Borzov) chambered for 12,7x108 mm, with rate of fire 4-4,5 thousand rds / min. Both machine guns were intended for use on helicopters. In particular, the YakB-12,7 was installed on a number of modifications of the Mi-24 in a mobile unit.
Several interesting rumors or, if you like, legends are associated with Soviet multi-barreled guns. Both concern GSh-6-30. According to the first, this gun was tested not on trucks, like other weapons, but on tanks, because with a rate of fire of 6000 rounds, the complete destruction of the first required a volley less than a second long. The second legend says that when firing from the GSh-6-30, shells fly out so often that they almost bump into each other in the air. Interestingly, interesting things are also told about the American gun GAU-8 / A Avenger (7 barrels, 30 mm, up to 3,9 thousand rds / min). For example, when firing from it, the A-10 attack aircraft stops in the air from recoil. Here it is, the glory of the people.

Germans, cartridges, two barrels

Multi-barrel weapon systems don't end with the Gatling pattern. There is another, slightly less popular and less well-known scheme - the Gast system. In 1917, the German gunsmith K. Gast combined automation with a short barrel stroke and multi-barrel in one machine gun. His machine gun called Gast-Maschinengewehr Modell 1917 caliber 7,92 mm worked according to the following principle: one of the two barrels, rolling back after the shot, loaded the second barrel through a special bracket and vice versa. On tests, the Gast machine gun accelerated to 1600 rounds per minute.



In 1965, the designers of the Tula KBP created their own version of the weapon according to the Gast scheme - GSh-23. She was equipped with various types of aircraft and helicopters. Moreover, both in the version of course weapons (MiG-23, Su-7B, etc.), and for installation on mobile rifle installations (Tu-95MS, Il-76, etc.). Interestingly, despite the lower rate of fire (up to 4 thousand rounds per minute) than that of the six-barreled GSh-6-23, the GSh-23 turned out to be one and a half times lighter - 50,5 kg versus 76.

In the late 70s, the GSH-25-30 gun, also made according to the Gast scheme, was specially designed for the Su-2 attack aircraft, which was then being created. Its two barrels give out only three thousand shots, but this is compensated by the caliber of 30 millimeters. Later, a version of the gun with longer barrels was created, designed for installation on Mi-24P helicopters.

What's next?

Next year, the Gatling system will be 150 years old. Gast's scheme is a bit younger. Unlike their predecessors - mitraliasis - these systems are actively used and no one is going to abandon them yet. At the same time, for a long time, multi-barreled systems did not have significant increases in the rate of fire. There are two main reasons for this: firstly, new materials and technologies are needed for the next increase in the rate of fire. The Americans, for example, have already had to deal with jamming of the then-existing link projectile belts. Secondly, frankly speaking, there is little point in dispersing cannons or machine guns: the density of fire will grow exclusively along with the consumption of ammunition. Based on the foregoing, it can be assumed that in the future the appearance of multi-barreled weapons will not change, but new materials and various know-how will be introduced.
26 comments
Information
Dear reader, to leave comments on the publication, you must sign in.
  1. German
    +4
    25 November 2011 09: 27
    I saw shooting from the A-630 once --- amazing!
    1. +9
      25 November 2011 10: 32
      Good article without unnecessary load and with interesting details
  2. vadimus
    +4
    25 November 2011 09: 33
    The very idea is impressive.
  3. Net
    Net
    +4
    25 November 2011 10: 31
    I could be wrong, but in my opinion, "the plane stops in the air" is about testing the GSh-6-23 with a rate of fire of 10 rpm. on the Su-000. Arkady Shipunov told in some program.
    1. Tyumen
      +1
      25 November 2011 17: 49
      The output of the GAU-8/A is exactly half of the thrust of the A-10 engines.
  4. dred
    +1
    25 November 2011 10: 45
    Heard about a new setup that shoots 10000 wt.min.
    1. 0
      25 November 2011 16: 36
  5. Ion coaelung
    0
    25 November 2011 11: 11
    How much money do such guns fire per minute? belay
    1. schta
      +6
      25 November 2011 13: 53
      How much money do such guns fire per minute? belay

      Much cheaper than a downed enemy aircraft
      1. 0
        2 December 2011 17: 52
        consider the price of an enemy aircraft? Why, you need to consider the price of your ship on which this gun stood
    2. 0
      11 May 2015 21: 12
      Quote: Ion Coaelung
      How much money do such guns fire per minute?

      Not money, but a kilogram!!
  6. Artemka
    0
    25 November 2011 11: 16
    Yes, the consumption of one such gun is huge, what can we say about all the guns at once.
  7. +2
    25 November 2011 15: 24
    not a word about Vietnam .. and there, on the turntables, the amers began to use "miniguns" with might and main
  8. +3
    25 November 2011 16: 00
    Gryazev and Shipunov are unsurpassed designers in this field. The Americans were not even close.
    1. German
      +2
      25 November 2011 22: 39
      no need to think that there are fools. just a different approach.
      1. 0
        25 November 2011 22: 55
        http://topwar.ru/8535-novyy-cheshskiy-avtomat-cz-805-bren.html#comment-id-73739
    2. 0
      12 January 2014 23: 02
      I liked the GSh-30K very much. The Gast scheme personally seems to me more promising than the Gatling scheme.
  9. +1
    25 November 2011 16: 05
    The main disadvantage of Gatlings is their electric drive.
    GSh is pure mechanics.
    1. Jaguar
      0
      25 November 2011 23: 13
      Quote: Pharao7766
      GSh is pure mechanics.
      Why are you posting false information? GSh-6-30L with electric drive, unlike others http://www.tulamash.ru/prod_ao18.htm
      1. +1
        29 November 2011 10: 17
        I agree that GSh-6-30L has an electric drive. But, if you pay attention to other products of "GSh" - GSh-6-30 (9-A-621), GSh-6-30K, GSh-6-23 they all have gas engines. And even at the development stage, Gryazev and Shipunov decided to abandon the electric motor .... which, as you understand, makes it possible to use (albeit conditional) from de-energized equipment.
        So the GSh-6-30L is more of an exception than a practice.
        http://www.vvkure.org/vvkure/6-30
    2. bober
      0
      27 November 2011 14: 25
      you have to be naive to think that the Americans can’t make a gas propulsion. and what’s so special about the air engine that is used on various rotating pneumatic tools? but as they say there are no analogues))))))))))))
  10. 0
    25 November 2011 19: 06
    if I'm not mistaken, the XM214 Microgun was at the iron arnie in the 2nd terminator)) And now the amers are trying to fit it to their own, still raw, exoskeleton for the marines.
    1. German
      0
      25 November 2011 22: 42
      it was a combined shooting - blank charges were used to reduce. power and support for Arnie, otherwise I would have given him a seat on his feet.
    2. 0
      25 November 2011 23: 09
      Jesse Ventura managed to run around with this bandura before him. Plus, the jungle. And recently Taktarov joined them. wink
  11. Perry
    0
    8 December 2011 16: 18
    on planes with "volcanoes" they did not build a machine gun into the plane, but the plane was built around a machine gun
  12. 0
    30 July 2017 23: 57
    Wow what articles Kirill Ryabov wrote before! And there is no human language and no self-repetitions, and there are no special blunders to be seen. Looks like the hand of a fighter is tired of writing.