"Terminator" at the exhibition in Nizhny Tagil

Not so long ago on the site was posted a detailed article on this technique: Russian Terminator. BMPT is a multi-purpose combat vehicle created on the basis of tank T-90S. During the presentation, visitors to the salon were shown the action of the armament control of the BMPT tower.

According to the manufacturer’s description, the Terminator is intended to destroy enemy personnel armed with anti-tank grenade launchers, missile systems and also small arms weapons.

Also, BMPT is capable of hitting lightly armored targets, enemy tanks and infantry fighting vehicles, helicopters and low-flying low-speed aircraft. Thanks to good security and high maneuverability, the "Terminator" can be effectively used in combat conditions in mountainous and wooded areas and urban areas.

Comments

[panzersoldat]

Why isn't it being adopted? Or our tanks "as usual" and without support cope.?

[Vadivak]

http://btvt.narod.ru/3/bmpt_future/bmpt_future.htm
There are many opinions, read this

[Bogatir]

Why is it needed?

[Joker]

Quote: Bogatir

Vadivak

I join, an explanatory article.

Quote: Bogatir

Why is it needed?

It’s just written there.

[kagorta]

And I do not think that we need BMPT. We need a heavy infantry fighting vehicle with a good weapon module (in my opinion, the 30-mm guns are rather weak, we need 40). Yes, and just how to include them in the units. To platoon in a tank company?

[Zhylan]

I think the military instead of BMPT with 5 crew members more needs a heavy BMP with 3 crew members and 7 motorized rifles on board. The weapons module is of course subject to discussion, but for me it’s not necessary to come up with a Bahce-U bike that still drives. And another increase in guns with a 30-mm leads to a decrease in rate of fire and a decrease in the quantity of ammunition carried.

[kesa1111]

Both are needed.

[esso]

Have you ever seen at least once how a 30mm 2A42 cannon shoots? You don’t have to talk about any weakness. Don’t bring any bullshit. You do not need to change the caliber. This will do. There is certainly a better one on BMP 3 (2A72).
But the main thing is to focus on upgrading this gun and making new ammunition for it. We need BMPs, they need to be transferred to the tank company as support. But not in this form. It is worth upgrading the guns on the combat module. Add ATGM to 8 at least. Improve 30mm guns.
Well, before a heavy bmp, it will appear after the appearance of the armata. There will be a single combat platform on which you can put any module. And if you put a module on a heavy bmp with a large number of guns where the crew will fit.

[Evil Tatar]

Do not speed...
Shoot with the PM ...

[stalker]

For the conditions of the Middle East (desert and plateau) is suitable. It will go along with the tanks, detect it, or it will be given target designation for a grenade launcher, anti-tank missile system, an unmanned aerial vehicle and from all barrels along it. But tanks do not need to use ammunition for these purposes, they will burn fortifications and armored vehicles.

[Owl]

Controversial vehicle: for the deployment of brigades and staffing (if adopted), and for the selection of weapons for the combat module and deployment of weapons.

[frame5]

Five crew members, two of them are responsible for course grenade launchers with small aiming angles. Obviously, why it was not accepted into service, the car is far-fetched and serves more than the purpose of finding loot.

[Superduck]

Quote: frame5

Five crew members, two of them are responsible for course grenade launchers with small aiming angles.

This is the day before yesterday, a full-fledged SLA really from the field of space exploration.

[svvaulsh]

As an armament module, you can install a "shell" module (it works great on the ground), and the LMS is worked out there. It remains to change the ZR to ATGMs.

[mishan]

Every year, for ten years, if not more, they say that this is a novelty. And they take everything into service.

[Mr. Truth]

and instead of 125 mm they didn’t try to put a pair of 30 mm?

[datur]

an interesting thing but secondary and worse than the one that was made in the USSR.

[- = 999 = -]

I AGREE TO THOSE WHO SAY THAT BMPT IS NEEDED FOR US. BUT IT IS NOT SIMPLE NEEDED IT IS NEEDED FROM THE MOST TIME AS THE FIRST TANK WAS ENDED TO THE CITY. AND ABOUT THE POINT I DO NOT SHARE SHORTLY SHORT. ONLY THE FIRE FIGHTER IS NOT ENOUGH.
PS WHAT IS MORE IN WEAPONS IN THE ARMY THAN IT IS VARIETY AND SPECIFIC THEN BETTER.

[PSih2097]

Instead of peter, RPO, MPO, and RMG are needed.

[panzersoldat]

I agree that RPO is necessary for the city.

[kosmos84]

solve the war SOLDIERS

[iceviper]

kosmos84,
politicians decide the war

[andrey903]

Can try uninhabited tower on small calibers