Modern mortars. Part of 1

43

The 60-mm mortar complex M224 LWCMS is carried by a calculation of four people. This is a regular armament of army infantry and marine corps intended for fire support of small maneuverable subunits of high-explosive, lighting and smoke mines.

Mortars are part of the field artillery. They are intended for mounted shooting at concealed targets, as well as for destroying field fortifications and differ from cannons firing at targets at direct low level trajectory and howitzers, which usually fire at concealed targets that are not visible from the position of attack, along the attached trajectory .

The mortar shoots its ammunition (mine) along a high trajectory, which allows you to hit targets behind hills, on narrow streets, in ravines and trenches; The latest combat quality made it particularly useful in the First World War trench warfare. A mortar can be a very simple system: just throw a projectile into the barrel and shoot as fast as a soldier can throw projectiles at the barrel (20 shots per minute; it is quite possible to throw every three seconds). Plus, mortar systems can be transferred by force of calculation, a light mortar can weigh up to 23 kg and even ready-to-fire heavy towed mortars weigh 150 kg, which is not in favor of, for example, the M155 777-mm howitzer from BAE Systems, which weighs 4200 kg. In addition, the range of light mortars can reach 3,5 km, and the newest heavy systems 10 km.

The mortar appeared as siege weapons, which could shoot over the fortress walls in order to destroy the guns and destroy the structures behind them. After the reappearance of mortars in World War I, this class of artillery became widespread during World War II, where it played an extremely important, though often underestimated, role in many combat episodes. For example, the doctrine of the Wehrmacht considered mortars as the primary means of fire support for infantry, while the “barrel” artillery was reserved for “main attacks”. The mortar took place as a “pocket” artillery of a small unit - a role that it continues to play in a broad sense today.

Modern mortars are divided into three categories: light mortars (usually 60 mm) used at the platoon and company level, medium mortars (81 mm for Western models or 82 mm for Russian and Chinese), used at the company or battalion level, and 120-mm battalion level mortars, also used in artillery units. The tendency is that the dismounted infantry at the battalion level is armed with 81-mm mortars, whereas mechanized units usually have 120-mm mortars mounted on vehicles. Modern mortars are lighter, shoot farther, have greater accuracy and damaging ability than those systems that were deployed even 15 years ago. All this is due to the widespread use of new alloys and composite materials in the manufacture of mortar barrels and base plates, automation and digitization of fire control and progress in fuses and mortar ammunition. These innovations have increased the capabilities of the mortar in the performance of direct fire support tasks, despite the changing dynamics of ground combat, with its large extent, diverse operations and asymmetry. The obvious conclusion is that under these conditions the value of the mortar as a weapon system, as well as its contribution to the outcome of the battle, increases for the combat commander.


High mobility is one of the main tactical advantages of the Stryker mechanized units of the US Army. The ability to immediately return fire indirectly is critical to preserve the maneuverability advantages of these units.

Light mortars

What kind of armament is most suitable as standard for a unit of a particular level is determined by two main factors. First, how does it fit into the combat obligations of a unit of this level? In particular, does it correspond to the interests and range of tasks? Second, is it compatible with the ability of the units to deploy the system, that is, can they move and maintain it? Although the advantage of owning weapons longer range is obvious, but if too many soldiers are needed to carry it or its components, this may be impractical. The difficulty of moving a heavy system and providing enough ammunition can negate the value of the increased range. It is necessary to achieve balance. Most armies in the world agree that the 60-mm mortar is the best choice for a company of light infantry. The US Army’s FM7-90 mortar combat guide says: “The advantage of the 60-mm mortar ... lies in its immediate response to the orders of the company commander and the speed with which he can take action.”

The US Army and Marine Corps are armed with a lightweight mortar system M224 LWCMS (Lightweight Company Mortar System) with a real fire range from 70 meters to 3500 meters. The minimum range of the weapon is as important as the maximum, because it determines how close it is in front of its own forces to fire. This may be critical for disrupting an attack that threatens to “overwhelm” its positions, or to deter an opponent trying to cling to the positions of the Allied forces and avoid returning artillery fire. The M224 mortar and its 20 percent-lightened version of the M224A1 is available from General Dynamics Ordnance and Tactical Systems (GDOTS). This family of mortars firing high-explosive, smoke (white and red phosphorus), lighting (visible and infrared spectrum) and practical mines. In turn, Saab offers its M1061 MAPAM (Multi-Purpose Anti-Personnel Anti-Materiel - a multipurpose, anti-personnel, anti-materiel) mortar ammunition that can be used with the M224 / A1 mortar and shoot at a smaller distance from its forces thanks to controlled scattering fragments; in addition, it is able to penetrate the most vulnerable spot of the armored vehicle - the roof, and with a delay detonate inside it.

Another lightweight infantry 60-mm mortar under the designation M6 Mortar produces the Austrian company Hirtenberger. In addition to the Austrian army, it was adopted by the British Army and Marine Corps under the designation M6-895 (895 barrel length in mm), the maximum range of which is 3800 meters. In the case of the British, the previous concept was completely changed, according to which the light mortar was excluded in favor of a hand grenade launcher. However, the combat experience during the UK invasion of Afghanistan in the 2001 – 2013 years made it possible to evaluate the advantages of a light mortar, which made it necessary to reconsider plans to replace it. A tripod-mounted automatic grenade launcher (AH) is also sometimes considered a substitute for a lightweight mortar. However, the characteristics of the trajectory of the projectile in AG are closer to the mounted fire of the howitzer. In the case of AH, this makes it difficult to shoot backward slopes. In addition, they do not have such a diverse range of ammunition.


Mortar M6 Mortar of the Austrian company Hirtenberger

One of the features of 60-mm mortar is that, although greater accuracy and range is achieved when installed on a bipod and using a mechanism for horizontal and vertical guidance, it allows you to visually aim and fire with your hands and thus quickly hit targets. Taking into account this aspect, DSG Technology has developed the iMortar ultra-light 60-mm mortar for small units. With a weight of 5,5 kg and a length of 900 mm with an integrated aiming system, it is well suited for a small battle group, as also indicated by its small long range 1,2 km.



Ultralight 60-mm iMortar mortar


The American army adopted the 120-mm smoothbore mortar Elbit Soltam, which in the land version with a bipod received the designation M120; this mortar is used at battalion level


Towed 120-mm heavy mortars were adopted by the US Marine Corps, because they can be easily transferred by helicopter. The EFSS self-propelled expeditionary fire support complex includes 120-mm TDA rifled mortar and Growler light tractor.

Medium mortars

The 81 mm caliber (actually, the 81,4 mm) is most common in the Western armies, while the 82 mm caliber is typical of Russian and Chinese weapons. Although 82-mm mortars were spread in the Soviet army during World War II, they were subsequently replaced by 120-mm mortars in most units. The exception was the transportable and towed and self-propelled smooth-bore 2B9 “Cornflower” caliber 82 mm on a wheeled chassis, put into service in the 1970 year and used during the Afghan war in the 1979 – 1989 years. He is also still in service with the Russian Airborne Forces. Unlike traditional mortars, this mortar fires either with single shots or in automatic mode using four-round shops. The range of a mortar capable of firing high-explosive, smoke, lighting and armor-piercing projectiles is 4270 meters. The Chinese army is armed with Type 67, a modernized Soviet regimental mortar PM-41, which was put into service in 1941 year. This mortar was widely used in the Vietnam War.


2B9 "Cornflower" smoothbore 82 caliber mm

In the United States, advanced technologies have improved their 81-mm mortars, among which the newest is the M252 model weighing 42,3 kg. It is the standard weapon of the battalion level of the army units of the light infantry, and is also adopted by the marine corps. This 81-mm mortar was also installed on the upgraded version of the M113 armored personnel carrier, designated M125; shooting from a mortar was conducted through the open hatch on the roof of the hull. It is also installed on the LAV-M Mortar Marine Corps and transported in a M1129 Styker mortar conveyor (the main weapon is an 120-mm mortar), where it is removed from the vehicle for firing. M252 has a range of 5608 meters when firing all types of 81-mm ammunition.

The Mo 81 LLR mortar (Leger Long Renforce - light long fortified) developed by the French company Thales is in service with the French and Irish armies and is offered with a shortened 1,1 meter trunk (Leger Couf) and an elongated 1,5 meter trunk (Leger long). The standard range is 3100 meters, but when fired with mines of increased range, it rises to 5600 meters. The French company Nexter delivers mortar ammunition through its subsidiary company Mecar, which produces several types, such as 155-mm MPM (Metric Precision Munition - meter precision) with a maximum range of 40 km. Nexter has also developed and prepared for the production on the basis of its combat armored vehicle VBCI (Trafficule Blinde de Combat d'Infanterie) 120-mm mobile mortar complex, which has been ordered but not yet purchased by the French army.

Modern mortars. Part of 1

Mortar Mo 81 LLR manufactured by the French company Thales

All 81-mm projectiles are feathered (with stabilizing planes), and the most common type is high-explosive. The adoption of multi-mode fuses for high-explosive fragmentation mines allows the calculation just before firing easy to choose the mode of detonation of the projectile. Such fuses, such as M734, can be installed in several modes: shock, with a delay (allows you to pierce the roof or cover) or remote (undermining in the air over the target with the scattering of fragments over a large area). For example, a temporary fuse of the lighting mine is installed so that in the case descending over the target on the parachute the lighting mixture ignites and burns for 50-60 seconds with the brightness of the 525000 candles. The lighting composition can be equipped either to create a backlight in the visible range, or in the infrared. Smoke shells are filled with granules of red phosphorus, which are ignited in order to obtain a thick smoke screen. Another filler of mortar shells - white phosphorus - instantly forms a smoke screen, impairing visibility in the visible and infrared spectrum. It burns violently and can cause burns, but thanks to its instantaneous action it is ideal for labeling purposes.


The Elbit mortar complex SPEAR of the recoil force when shooting is quite small, which allows you to install it on light tactical vehicles. The system installed on the pickup has already been tested by US special forces in Afghanistan
43 comments
Information
Dear reader, to leave comments on the publication, you must sign in.
  1. +6
    8 August 2016 06: 51
    A plus! Very effective "pocket" artillery, capable of determining the result of the battle of rifle units, if the presence of heavy equipment is excluded (reduced to a minimum). The simplicity of manufacture, excellent weight and dimensions, and low cost determine the spread of this type of weapon in modern arimia.
    I personally like the type of weapons feel soldier
    hi
    1. +3
      8 August 2016 18: 56
      this is not pocket artillery. I would include barrel mines as pocket mines. in our army there were such, for FN Fal. a blank cartridge is put directly on the barrel and in the store. you can shoot as you like, even at an angle of 45 or 82 degrees. although the caliber is too small, 55 mm and 61, but it is quite possible to throw such a thing into a trench or over a hillock. the knapsack held up to 5 minutes. well, or a grenade (you can call it that) in Greek is called "ovida", ovids are called any projectile that can be fired at a mortar or a howitzer.
  2. +2
    8 August 2016 07: 38
    - It’s very bad that all these pretty effective weapons can be used against our soldiers ...
  3. +5
    8 August 2016 09: 42
    According to my own feelings. Caliber 82mm is nothing. They worked for me and "Cornflowers". But when 120mm fly up, that's when you feel the love of life.
    1. 0
      8 August 2016 10: 17
      But when 120mm fly up, then you feel the love of life.


      This question in the Soviet army had a long history of istria, about which the article says

      Although 82 mm mortars were distributed in the Soviet army during World War II, they were subsequently replaced in most parts by 120 mm mortars.
    2. +4
      8 August 2016 19: 56
      black

      By the way, do you know why in the USSR 82 mm, and the alliance has 81?

      So you can shoot the mines of the alliance.
  4. +3
    8 August 2016 09: 45
    With this in mind, DSG Technology has developed the ultralight iMortar 60mm mortar for smaller units.

    1. +2
      8 August 2016 20: 02
      Professor

      Such a small caliber is of course easier to carry. But with such a small caliber, you need to be able to hit the hardball, otherwise the wearable ammunition will not be enough.

      Unfortunately I can’t see it.

      And that soldier, as he suggests by leveling?

      Know the principles of guidance, target designation, types of targets, the time of continuous firing until the moment of retaliation in order to suppress. Are there any systems for determining counter-battery combat? General tactical use.

      Something not really I would like to hang around in the middle of the street, until the sniping from 400 meters began to heal you.
      1. 0
        8 August 2016 20: 40
        will not fly so far and usually fragments are smaller
      2. The comment was deleted.
  5. 0
    8 August 2016 10: 29
    Now the 120-mm mortars are most in demand - both in terms of firepower and in range and accuracy (using adjustable mines).

    The 81 / 82-mm mortar (not to mention the 60-mm) is already nothing - it is successfully replaced by the RPG-7 and modified rocket-propelled grenades with 81 / 82-mm high-explosive fragmentation mines installed instead of cumulative charges
    1. +5
      8 August 2016 11: 30
      RPG is still designed for flat shooting, and to send a projectile from it along an almost vertical path, to put it mildly, is complicated ....
      1. +7
        8 August 2016 12: 22
        High-explosive fragmentation mines from RPG-7 are fired along a hinged trajectory, and not vertically, at an angle of up to 45 degrees (restriction on the jet reflected from the ground) at a range of up to 400 meters.

        As an aiming device for mounted shooting on the RPG-7, a hinged frame sight from the AGS-40, RG-6, M79 grenade launchers and their analogues is installed.

        Modification of the RPG-7 and the shots to it have so far been made directly by the troops in weapons workshops.
        1. +1
          8 August 2016 17: 30
          HM interesting. In this case, someone should develop for the RPG-7 a normal machine with a sight and shooting tables smile .
      2. Alf
        0
        8 August 2016 22: 10
        Quote: alex-cn
        and to send a projectile from it along an almost vertical trajectory, to put it mildly, is complicated ....

        Sending something is easy, but getting there ...
  6. +2
    8 August 2016 10: 42
    Article goodwaiting for the continuation ...
  7. +5
    8 August 2016 11: 15
    It would be nice, but - from the photos there is only one "Cornflower" from all the domestic nomenclature? Despite the fact that in the article there is a clear dominance of photos of American mortars.
    It’s rather strange, considering that in fact the first mortar that deserves this name was invented in the Russian Empire, and not at all in the USA.
    1. -2
      9 August 2016 09: 57
      It’s rather strange, considering that in fact the first mortar that deserves this name was invented in the Russian Empire, and not at all in the USA.


      The article is called "modern mortars". It would seem that what does the Russo-Japanese War have to do with it?
    2. 0
      29 January 2017 15: 20
      Quote: Fei_Wong
      the article observes a clear dominance of photos of American mortars.

      And it is most likely from the American magazine / site-for-dummies stripped off, with a quick translation made (the structure of the language into Russian is different, a lot of Americanisms are felt even in a kind of Russian text), with a typical * US citizens * style of presentation for idiots, with the appropriate selection of material and point of view on its presentation.
    3. 0
      29 January 2017 15: 26
      Quote: Fei_Wong
      the first mortar worthy of this name was invented in the Russian Empire, and not at all in the USA.

      Russia is the birthplace of elephants, of course, but if you return to reality, the mortar was invented from different sides in all developed countries of the late 19th and early 20th centuries, the self-made construction of Gobyato in this series is not the only and not the main stage.

      Erhard achieved success in creating caliber heavy mortars, for example, in Germany, in creating a classic modern mortar - the French Brand and the English Stokes, etc.
  8. +1
    8 August 2016 11: 29
    Quote: Operator
    The 81 / 82-mm mortar (not to mention the 60-mm) is already nothing - it is successfully replaced by the RPG-7 and modified rocket-propelled grenades with 81 / 82-mm high-explosive fragmentation mines installed instead of cumulative charges

    First, replace the RPG-7 flat trajectory of fire with a mounted mortar (it is advisable to recollect all the laws of physics, because how to do it differently and at the same time maintain accurate ballistic characteristics and correspondence to the calculated artillery tables - I can’t imagine, although you know better). Then yes. You can write off the average mortars in the scrap.
    1. +2
      8 August 2016 12: 33
      Video shooting from an RPG-7 shot with an 82 mm mine
      https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=lVyA-3Rx8zk
      1. +1
        8 August 2016 15: 56
        cool, but this thing will not replace a light mortar :)
  9. +2
    8 August 2016 11: 49
    Forgot about the LAV-M - a self-propelled 107-mm mortar, based on the Canadian LAV-25. It is in service with the US Marine Corps.
    1. 0
      28 January 2017 15: 06
      Thanks to the author for the article. In the Red Army existed; 37-mm mortar spade of the minimum caliber. (after the Finnish company, our superiors cooled it, showed poor performance), 3 type 50 mm mortars, were disarmed in 1943 (due to low efficiency, and in vain, companies couldn’t do anything with German machine guns), 4 type 82 mm mortars (Sample 1937 was in 3 MSB (mountain) 181 MSP, 108 MSD 40 army, it was written in the regiment staff that it was an honor to command, it was very difficult and inconvenient to carry it around the mountains, they took no more than 3's to the mountains, the remaining personnel of the min.batra were used as porters of bp) 107mm mountain mines The children (who stopped production in 1941, began to produce 45 mm ptp at this plant) were so lacking in Afghanistan, but our commanders always cared about improving physical fitness, so they carried 82 mm mortars in the mountains, soldiers on their hump, including in Afghanistan, 120mm mortars (several types), 160mm mortars and 240mm mortars, 420 mm mortars (prototypes). At the moment I know that a new 82mm silent mortar has arrived and forgot about the Cornflower (82mm automatic mortar, the same were in the battalion). Thanks to the author for the article.
  10. 0
    8 August 2016 12: 40
    120mm Soviet regiment fired at 5,9 - 6,5km

    infantry fire support, especially in defense - mortars caused the greatest damage to the SA

    the fledged mine falls almost vertically, so the fragmentation damage from its lateral surface is much higher than that of a heavier howitzer shell, even without any remote fuses

    all this is in open literature, it is strange that attention is ignored here in the article
  11. +3
    8 August 2016 18: 43
    The mortar appeared as a siege weapon, which could shoot over the fortress walls with the aim of destroying the guns and destroying the structures behind them.

    I always thought that the mortar (bomb), captain Gobyato invented in the Russian-Japanese war, just with the opposite goal - to repel the attacks of the Japanese assaulting Port Arthur.
    1. 0
      8 August 2016 20: 52
      kvs207

      Why invent a mortar ...

      This is the praise of the mortars. Just in a modern concept.
      1. +2
        8 August 2016 21: 17
        mortar is a prototype of howitzers

        the first classic modern caliber mortar with all its specific advantages is the Stokes PMV system
  12. +8
    8 August 2016 19: 20
    but most of all I like the Russian 120 mm mortar 2B11 "Sani" feel . that’s really a well-thought-out thing from all angles. and then in the Greek army the American 120 mm recourse and there were cases with a mine burst in the barrel and the whole crew died. three were killed on the spot, another in the 424th hospital died. 82 mm ripped one more time, but this is when I served in 1996. also it is not clear because of what. two were injured. and in general I tend to trust Russian weapons more. we had BMP1, when Germany united then they gave us a lot of things. including BMP and Bobiki, callash to the heap, bassoons. and everything is still working properly. only BMP 1 half were pure rubbish, killed, well, for spare parts. and those that are on the go are many times better than the M-113 and our Leonidas. if they still had a rear ramp and a Thunder cannon changed to 30 mm, then there would generally be a song. but the Americans shoved us in again, though this time without money another 300 M-113 vehicles ... if only we would not buy from Russia new BMPs or spare parts for old ones. and M-113 is such a sad shit. there are no words. crying
  13. +4
    8 August 2016 20: 03
    We had such a piece of iron. Although usually it was used for hanging lighting missiles.
    1. +6
      9 August 2016 01: 20
      there are also lighting ones, they descend by parachute, there are chemical, and high-explosive, or just smoke, in case you need to indicate the landing point or where there are your own in which square. we shot OF s. but since the Greeks decided to feed the children at first. so Styer arrived at the beginning, they gave everyone a puff of cheese, and the shells lay unpacked in the sun. I told our captain that they say they’ll heat up now, in the sun, we had + 40-42 degrees ..but he waved off. and then the first 6 runaway ... flew to Bulgaria, and exploded there in corn. well, there were still no people in the fields. the captain cursed (I learned so many new combinations in Greek laughing with matyuki) the soldiers ran ... and I was funny to the point of hysteria. Of course, they did not find the guilty ones ... they shoved everything to the expelling charges for min.mol the old ones turned out to be. but then they always listened to me, listened. I even later downloaded in the arms. I was carrying the weight of army junk, sat mending. where the trigger is where the shutter itself, where the front sight will align. until they sent illegal immigrants to the Albanian border to catch. there ... was JO PA .. with a capital letter. I wanted to go home right away. what Well, just chasing the Albanians in the mountains is not much fun. not only did they run like saigas, and they always had weapons with them. sometimes shot at us. some distracted, while others at this moment, on the other hand, passed the border under the guise. and our site was 18 km. the car will not work, but if it rains, hang yourself. mud is liquid, up to the chest. here you come and how in shit failed. the mules got stuck in the mud right up to their belly. and cold. damp ... what kind of place is this. if you don’t drown in the mud, then mosquitoes will eat. well, we didn’t have to take the mortars there. all the heavy weapons in the unit remained. we didn’t even take personal weapons with us. instead of FN they gave out German G-3 A3 or A4 with a retractable butt, but I got NK 11. ruch. machine gun . but I still took his G-3 from a friend and walked with a rifle. and then carry 10 kg of weapons 18km on a pedestal ... something has incurred me .. all. I won’t be anymore .. empty.
  14. +1
    8 August 2016 20: 56
    I read from someone in his memoirs how he witnessed the mortar crew perishing.

    Two mortar throwers threw worlds into the barrel in turn. And from the firing of this deaf.
    One mine gave a delay, but the mortar did not notice. He threw a second into the trunk.
    1. Alf
      +4
      8 August 2016 22: 24
      Quote: gladcu2
      I read from someone in his memoirs how he witnessed the mortar crew perishing.

      Two mortar throwers threw worlds into the barrel in turn. And from the firing of this deaf.
      One mine gave a delay, but the mortar did not notice. He threw a second into the trunk.

      If my memory serves me right, it was just for our 82 mm that a device was created that prevents recharging.
      1. +1
        9 August 2016 12: 37
        At the beginning of the XNUMXs, the magazine had an article about a double-loading fuse, both the Allies and the Germans had problems with double-loading, our allies provided documentation on it. In the photo of the new mortars it is no longer visible, apparently somehow solved the problem?
  15. +1
    8 August 2016 22: 29
    If anyone is interested about mortars, it is interestingly written by A.B. Shirokorada: in particular, on the development of Soviet mortars before and during the Second World War, pluses and minuses in comparison with barreled artillery, etc.

    Shirokorad A. B. Secrets of Russian artillery. - M .: Yauza, Eksmo, 2003 .-- 480 s, ill. ISBN 5-8153-0172-8
    1. 0
      29 January 2017 15: 12
      Shirokorad requires careful attention and a certain preparedness of the reader. Preparedness is not in the sense that it is difficult for him to understand something - but because his texts are replete with errors and unsubstantiated statements that an unprepared reader is ready to accept on faith.

      But he can also find a lot of useful facts.
  16. 0
    29 January 2017 15: 08
    The language of the article reveals that this is a translation, and it’s clumsy, and the original article was from some popular foreign magazine or from a site similar in purpose.
    The content is also not happy. Chewing on already obvious concepts, plus a heap of some arbitrarily torn up actual facts, without sane analysis and discussion.
  17. 0
    9 March 2024 17: 49
    Which weapons are most suitable as standard weapons for a unit at a particular level are determined by two main factors. First, how does it fit into the combat responsibilities of a unit at this level? In particular, does it correspond to interests and range of tasks? Second, is it compatible with the units' ability to deploy the system, that is, can they move and maintain it?

    light mortars are only suitable for saboteurs and task forces operating behind enemy lines.
    The infantry does not need them on the battlefield - low accuracy, weak ammunition, logistics problems when moving a unit to the battlefield.