US Naval Institute: The End of the Carrier Era
The flagships of the US Navy, the embodiment of American scope, power and flight of engineering and military-technical thought are ready to disappear from the seas and oceans. Like dinosaurs that once lived in a multitude and then disappeared completely and forever ...
Such prospects for the monsters of the American military fleet draws Ben Ho Van Beng, a senior analyst at the prestigious School of International Studies, headquartered in Singapore. It was his report on the topic of threats to aircraft carriers, published by the US Naval Institute and sounds like a requiem for the timelessly leaving the present day in depth. stories this type of ships.
Firstly, this is a fairly small deck radius aviation. Most F-18 fighter bombers (McDonnell Douglas F / A-18 Hornet) cannot retire from the base more than 500 nautical miles (926 km). And provided that the ship is at such a distance from the shore, the Hornet (as translated from English Hornet) is deprived of the possibility of penetrating deep into the territory of the enemy. If the object of the attack is not a shallow island, but a country with a "strategic depth" - then there is no sense in F-18.
The F-35 promised to replace him (in the American press, the development of this project does not hesitate to call it a “soap opera”), too, does not solve the problem, because its combat radius is more than 10% in the Hornet (reaches 550 offshore miles or xnumx km).
Second, the two main probable opponents of the United States — China and Russia — are developing a new generation of long-range missiles that can be “pushed” deep into the continent — the above-mentioned expert believes that they can really be launched from a distance of 800 miles (1482 km) from coast for targets that are within the maximum range of US carrier-based aviation. The line of missile defense, due to its distance from the coast, high speed and low altitude of the missiles makes them virtually invisible to aircraft carriers.
Thus, the defending side does not need to attack aircraft carriers with dozens of coastal aircraft - it is enough, according to the expert, to hit one DF-21 rocket produced by China to put a vessel with a length of 335 meters to the bottom, together with a crew of approximately 6000 people. It is difficult to say where the planes that fly away from the mission will land after that (and on their aircraft carriers of the Nimitz class from 66 to 84 units).
Planned new series - class "Gerald Ford." The first one was launched in the 2013 year. On 2019, the second is scheduled for construction. Tactical performance (TTX) is slightly different from those of the “Nimitz”.
The need to use this type of ship, in the existing conditions, disappears. Just as the need for building new ones disappears.
Carriers that, by their mere appearance near enemy territory, were to inflict animal fear on the enemy and give birth in his head the only thought - to surrender, turn into a bulky vessel, suitable at best as a prop for filming. At worst - for scrap. Titans are transformed into "Titanic."
And the global program of their construction, it seems, is more for “sawing” the funds allocated by the state: few people will be able to scare someone with such armament, and it’s easy to push money offshore.
There is another reason for which the US military can insist on “continuing the banquet” with aircraft carriers - similarly in the 80 of the last century, the USA pushed the USSR to invest huge money in the program-response to the US SDI (Strategic Defense Initiative). “Star Wars” ended up being a pure bluff, but the blow to the Soviet economy was very powerful. But if today the American "Nimitz" and "Geralda Fords" unwind with the same purpose, then it is unlikely that someone in the Russian Defense Ministry will bite again on such a bait.
Information