Metal to replace gunpowder

35
Metal to replace gunpowderAlready that century is the basis of the vast majority weapons is gunpowder. Until now, the invention of the ancient Chinese has not lost its relevance and will not lose it in the near future. Moreover, the very concept of throwing ammunition with the help of explosive release of gases with a special mixture will remain practically applicable even when mankind will also fight in space. In this case, firearms, with a number of relevant modifications, will be one of the most formidable arguments of the space forces. If the laser beam can be “fought off” with a suitable mirror coating, then kinetic ammunition will be stopped only by armor, which makes the equipment heavier, and therefore increases the cost of its launch into space. Only by the time of the first fights in space could metallurgy have time to make new light sorts of armor. Not to refuse on this occasion the shells, hitting the target due to the kinetic energy? Yes, and on Earth there is still where to fight.

The existing powder ammunition has reached its limits. Weapon chemistry has already “welded” almost all possible types of gunpowder with maximum propelling properties. The heat of combustion of the most "strong" varieties does not reach 4 MJ / kg. Accordingly, it would be logical to use other substances instead of gunpowder, with large numbers of heat of combustion, for example, metals, which have this indicator many times more. So, to achieve the same effect, you can put in the sleeve less active substance. This concept of ammunition was called pneumoelectric cartridge / projectile. Now we will consider this idea in more detail, and it will become clear why it was called this way.

What is a pneumatic cartridge. In appearance, it vaguely resembles ordinary powder, although it has smaller dimensions, especially length. Instead of a capsule, a flammable element (a spiral or something similar) is placed in it, and instead of powder there is metal powder and a certain amount of compressed oxidant gas (oxygen or even fluorine). There is also a certain amount of another gas, it may be a substance from the right edge of the periodic table - an inert gas, or an excess amount of oxidizer. The principle of operation of the cartridge is simple: the electric igniter of the weapon applies voltage to the igniting element, which ignites the metal powder. It, in turn, burns in an oxygen atmosphere at high speed and produces a large amount of heat. Since the volume of gases generated during combustion is insufficient for firing, the heat heats up the inert gas and that, respectively, adds the missing pressure. Combustion products together with heated inert gas push the bullet out of the cartridge and the barrel. "Electro" in the name of the ammunition says about the method of ignition, and "pneumatic" - about the method of acceleration of the bullet. The fact is that the main impulse is given to it by a heated and expanded “additional” gas.

Pneumoelectric cartridges in the "laboratory conditions" have the following advantages over powder:
- large specific power charge. This will allow both to increase the initial speed of the bullet / projectile, and to reduce the size of the ammunition while maintaining the characteristics. Accordingly, it is possible to increase the capacity of the ammunition of an individual fighter.

- no need to spend part of the energy of gases on the work of automation. It should be noted that this thesis requires the use of batteries of sufficient capacity and power on weapons. If they are not there, then instead of the gas engine that is traditional for powder automatons, a generator with suitable characteristics can be installed, which will ensure the work, or you can keep the usual gas automatics adapted to the new working conditions.
- simplifying the design of the weapon and reducing the number of moving parts. Completely get rid of the latter will not succeed, but the layout and operation should become easier.

- complete failure of any external power source or built-in battery. When using the relevant material of the igniting spiral in pneumoelectric weapons, it is possible to use a piezoelectric element associated with a trigger as a generator. However, in this case, you will have to either take away some of the gases for the gas engine, or do mechanics similar to double-action revolvers, where when you press the trigger the drum rotates, the trigger is cocked and lowered.

Nevertheless, the creation of practically applicable pneumoelectric ammunition requires the solution of a number of problems:
- thermal. The high heat of combustion of the metallic charge of the cartridge requires the use of new materials with better heat resistance. Otherwise, if the barrel of a weapon, etc. to do with current technology, a gun or machine gun can melt down or even catch fire in the hands of the shooter. Also, a metal barrel, under certain circumstances, can also react with an oxidizing gas or its excess, intended to disperse a bullet.
- chemical and abrasive properties. In the pneumoelectric weapon, as in the powder, carbon deposits are formed. Moreover, the soot from the metal charge will have greater abrasive properties than powder. This problem can be solved in conjunction with the previous one by applying special barrel coatings like Teflon. Additionally, the weapon can be equipped with a purge system with “outboard” air, which will partially cool and clean the barrel. Also, metals can be replaced by other substances whose oxides have a lower hardness.
- reaction time. The burning rate of most metals under normal conditions is insufficient for use in weapons "as is". To accelerate the combustion reaction is proposed using catalysts, changing the shape or size of the particles of the working substance. As an alternative, you can consider the increased pressure of the oxidant gas or even use it in a liquefied form.
- features of the electrical circuit. The use of a large number of electrical parts in weapons requires appropriate sealing in order to avoid short circuits and failure. For this, the electrical igniter assembly can be made as a separate unit having a good seal.

For example, the entire electrical “stuffing” on a pneumatic electric weapon with a gas engine of automation (piezoelectric element connected with the trigger, a set of capacitors and contacts of the igniter) can be placed in a single case, additionally filled with epoxy resin or other similar material. However, the repair node will have to perform a complete replacement.

Despite the fact that pneumoelectric charges do not constitute an explosive in the classical sense, they can be used not only for throwing ammunition. One of the “alternative” applications of pneumoelectric weapons is to increase the effectiveness of high-explosive fragmentation projectiles. In this connection, the following example is often cited: the surface of the internal cavity of the projectile is made of zirconium or of an alloy based on it, and the cavity itself is filled with oxygen or oxygen mixed with another gas. In a twenty kilogram-like projectile, if it hits the target, it is only due to the impact that the combustion reaction can start, due to which per kilogram of oxygen accounts for about 2,8 kg of reacted zirconium. During the reaction with this amount of the starting materials, about 80 MJ of thermal energy is released, which corresponds to approximately 20-22 kilograms of TNT. The remaining three or four kilograms of oxygen, for example, heat up sharply and tear up the shell of the projectile, scattering the surrounding space with shrapnel and causing the surrounding objects to ignite. Also, instead of an excess amount of oxygen, a more effective oxidizing agent fluorine or heat-resistant toxic substances can be pumped into the projectile.

However, the greater interest is not the substance used in the projectile, but its quantity: in the specified example, the projectile weighs 20 kg, and the reacted substances are less than four, which is less than 20% of the total mass. If we add to them the four kilograms of substances that lead to the rupture of the projectile, then all of its chemical part is only 40%. Thus, firstly, you can increase the power of the munition, keeping the same dimensions, and secondly, to create fragments, a sufficient amount of metal remains comparable to existing projectiles. But the most interesting fact in the practical aspect is that the zirconium-oxygen pneumoelectric projectile is similar in mass and heat indicators to a projectile entirely made of TNT.

As for the reliability of the projectile, it is unlikely that the designers, when it comes to at least prototypes, will rely on the heat generated upon impact. It will be much more profitable to use an electric or chemical fuse, which releases the energy necessary to start the reaction. In addition to the creation of artillery shells, it is possible to create hand grenades, mortar mines, anti-tank mines and aviation bombs with a similar principle of action.

However, despite all the advantages of the pneumoelectric weapon and the patent on the principle of action, the work on the topic is going extremely slowly and sluggishly. Coupled with a whole range of problems that prevent the use of pneumoelectric ammunition, this slowness does not give reason for optimism. If all the works go the same way as now, then the first prototypes will be dealt with by the year 2020, and then, with good luck and no additional difficulties have arisen.
35 comments
Information
Dear reader, to leave comments on the publication, you must sign in.
  1. +24
    26 December 2011 08: 38
    "If the laser beam can be bounced off with a suitable mirror coating,"

    Seriously? At all wavelengths? A suitable coating for an x-ray laser in the studio!

    "Only by the time of the first battles in space can metallurgy have time to make new light types of armor"


    it is not metallurgy that can make new light grades of armor, but rather the chemistry and technology of composites

    "instead of gunpowder - metal powder and a certain amount of compressed oxidizing gas (oxygen or even fluorine)."

    What the fuck fluoride? After the third shot, all arrows without a gas mask die?

    "special barrel coatings like Teflon."

    Remind me how hard it is to scratch the Teflon coating :)


    "outboard air blowing system"


    Yes, yes, so that fluorine disperses better!


    "The burning rate of most metals is not sufficient under normal conditions."


    Highly dependent on metal particle size

    "a pistol or machine gun can melt or even catch fire in the hands of the shooter."

    No power to comment on this :)))


    "Instead of an excess amount of oxygen, a more effective oxidizer, fluorine, or heat-resistant toxic substances can be injected into the projectile."


    Do you know that chemical weapons are prohibited by international conventions and destroyed in the United States and Russia?
    1. Lech e-mine
      +2
      26 December 2011 08: 47
      Remember our submarine where people who poisoned with these gases died during the tests. (Fire extinguishing system seems to work)
      1. Trezvomag
        0
        26 December 2011 21: 05
        This boat is Nerpa, which will be leased to India. And the fire extinguishing system worked there because of the sailor-gouging, who just clicked the button to turn on the fire extinguishing system (and without warning anyone). But the gases with which people were poisoned were not these. In theory, there should have been freon (which would have led to the death of people anyway), but the plant decided to save money and poured into the cylinders another no less toxic gas (I don’t remember the exact name)
        1. -1
          27 December 2011 19: 38
          The gas that was used (possibly used) in domestic technology is freon. Used not only on submarines. Much more toxic than freon, but requires less concentration to extinguish. As far as I remember, the Ministry of Defense decided to save then. As usual, the main thing is cheaper and faster. And people somehow ...
          1. 0
            27 December 2011 20: 21
            The full name of the gas is tetrafluorodibromoethane, grade 114B2. Besides the fact that it itself is toxic (but not too much like chemical weapons) it turns into phosgene at high temperatures - here it’s already two breaths in a week, three breaths at once ... On submarines and military facilities (in particular underground bunkers ) The Ministry of Defense of the Russian Federation is still applied.
    2. +2
      26 December 2011 11: 16
      I will tell you a secret: these women have so many problems and such dull tactical prospects that no one gives them money. So they don't even shoot in laboratories. wink
  2. dred
    0
    26 December 2011 12: 07
    Maybe they are also expensive.
    1. Artemka
      -1
      26 December 2011 14: 41
      Yes, perhaps soon there will be energy weapons.
  3. Dmitry.V
    +1
    26 December 2011 12: 22
    People can easily come up with something new to kill their own kind, so it's not worth worrying about gunpowder.
  4. +2
    26 December 2011 12: 26
    But in the photo, what a wunderwafer ???
    1. Dmitry.V
      +3
      26 December 2011 12: 32
      Like a railgun or a Gauss gun
      1. 0
        27 December 2011 20: 52
        In "Popular Mechanics" it is described how to make a "Gauss cannon" from five disposable cameras, a couple of batteries and some other common rubbish. A shell (a nail, I don’t remember exactly) from 10 meters pierces a glass bottle, judging by the article. Haven't tried it, but interesting.
  5. marauder
    -3
    26 December 2011 12: 43
    It's amazing how much this nonsense was missed.

    Quote: Syrdon
    high specific charge power. This will allow both to increase the initial velocity of the bullet / projectile, and to reduce the size of the ammunition while maintaining the characteristics.


    generally mass flies. The light bullet stops quickly.
    what hepa then make a large-caliber weapon.
    accelerate faster and all. gunpowder allows this, but there is no bullet body,
    deformed.
  6. +1
    26 December 2011 14: 56
    I don’t know about this unit, but I liked the first comment, but in my opinion a more promising direction is a sleeveless firearm ...
    What is a pneumoelectric cartridge. In appearance, it is vaguely reminiscent of the usual powder, although it has smaller dimensions, especially length. Instead of a capsule, a flammable element (a spiral or something similar) is placed in it, and instead of gunpowder - a metal powder and a certain amount of compressed oxidizing gas (oxygen or even fluorine).

    Something like -

    instead of gunpowder - metal powder and a certain amount of compressed oxidizing gas
  7. 0
    26 December 2011 15: 04
    "then the kinetic ammunition will be stopped only by the armor, which makes the equipment heavier, and therefore increases the cost of its launch into space"
    wink
    At space speeds, the armor does not play a role, unless the prohibitive mass of the armor.

    "Instead of a capsule, it houses a flammable element (a spiral or something like that), and instead of gunpowder, a metal powder and a certain amount of compressed oxidizing gas (oxygen or even fluorine)."
    wink
    If only we would look in the directory the temperature of the beginning of the reaction. As a result, two competing directions are mixed.

    "by using special barrel coatings like Teflon"
    wink
    There is nothing to comment on, rather in the directory.
    On this, I counted a few more places of luggage of knowledge.
    In general, the gaping spaces of the authors in the school education that is usual for our locality, even the middle classes, are depressing.
    Regards, Best regards.

    then the kinetic ammunition will be stopped only by the armor, which makes the equipment heavier, and, therefore, increases the cost of its output into space
    wink
    At space speeds, the armor does not play a role, unless the prohibitive mass of the armor.

    Instead of a capsule, a flammable element (a spiral or something similar) is placed in it, and instead of gunpowder - a metal powder and a certain amount of compressed oxidizing gas (oxygen or even fluorine).
    wink
    If only we would look in the directory the temperature of the beginning of the reaction. As a result, two competing directions are mixed.

    by applying special barrel coatings like teflon
    wink
    There is nothing to comment on, rather in the directory.
    On this, I counted a few more places of luggage of knowledge.
    In general, the gaping spaces of the authors in the school education that is usual for our locality, even the middle classes, are depressing.
    Sincerely, thanks for the topic, with best wishes.
  8. 0
    26 December 2011 15: 05
    then the kinetic ammunition will be stopped only by the armor, which makes the equipment heavier, and, therefore, increases the cost of its output into space
    smile
    At space speeds, the armor does not play a role, unless the prohibitive mass of the armor.

    Instead of a capsule, a flammable element (a spiral or something similar) is placed in it, and instead of gunpowder - a metal powder and a certain amount of compressed oxidizing gas (oxygen or even fluorine).
    smile
    If only we would look in the directory the temperature of the beginning of the reaction. As a result, two competing directions are mixed.

    by applying special barrel coatings like teflon
    smile
    There is nothing to comment on, rather in the directory.
    On this, I counted a few more places of luggage of knowledge.
    In general, the gaping spaces of the authors in the school education that is usual for our locality, even the middle classes, are depressing.
    Sincerely, thanks for the topic, with best wishes.
  9. mar.tira
    0
    26 December 2011 15: 07
    Soldiers in the army at the training ground are still eating porridge, and you talk about some kind of star wars!
    1. 0
      26 December 2011 16: 38
      pearl barley and buckwheat. oatmeal, this shit let the lords devour. :)
    2. 0
      26 December 2011 17: 02
      In fact, there were "star wars" in the USSR. If the people are interested, I will try to carve out a little time and write about one well-known design bureau (we will not name names), where combat lasers were developed.
      1. 0
        26 December 2011 18: 29
        About these KB: http://topwar.ru/8946-boevye-kvantovye-generatory-sssr.html?
        1. -1
          26 December 2011 19: 56
          Not. About ours is not even mentioned here. Our topic was supersonic flow chemical lasers: deuterium fluorine, oxygen iodine, and excimer lasers.

          Moreover, the problem indicated in your link, "no compact and super-powerful energy source" was not a problem for chemical lasers, so they were considered as the main option for space
          1. -1
            27 December 2011 19: 50
            Interesting. I read about chemically pumped lasers. I even read that the Americans used the idea. They even tried to develop aviation systems with such lasers. In nete about 2-3 years ago, an article slipped that such a laser was already developed for ganship (like the S-130H).
  10. Fuck_usa
    0
    26 December 2011 15: 41
    Straight Star Warriors some ....
  11. +1
    26 December 2011 16: 37
    still haite our generals, who ignore everything new, they don’t need anything if the Pindos don’t have such a dick. the atomic bomb was also fantastic, a piece of metal explodes. a bunch of examples. do not reject everything at once.
    1. -1
      26 December 2011 17: 05
      No one rejects new good ideas. The problem is that the authors of such articles often have gaps not only in higher, but even in secondary technical education.
      1. +2
        26 December 2011 17: 12
        Nowadays, higher education is not an indicator. we know how students are studying now. a mess rather than study, a mess in the literal sense.
  12. +3
    26 December 2011 17: 36
    do not reject everything at once.

    Then why do you need AB, let's develop and build these:

    1. Lech e-mine
      -1
      27 December 2011 19: 52
      oooooooooooooooooooooooooooo Star Wars - nothing comes to mind.
      1. +1
        27 December 2011 20: 38
        Galaxy...
  13. +1
    26 December 2011 19: 50
    The whole article is, in my opinion, the green mare. What are the dimensions of the ammunition, if there are: metal, two gas components and another spiral from the boiler to heat up all this infernal mixture.
  14. +2
    26 December 2011 21: 01
    For starters, let the normal gunshots do. and then let them take on fiction! The Gauss system is perfectly applied by amers, worked out with a bang, it was not in vain that a bunch of dough were thrown. I believe that energy weapons are a promising area. Moreover, all the developments are there. it is only necessary to bring together and bring to mind. In Soviet times, how many developments in this direction were buried!
    1. eJik
      0
      27 December 2011 08: 18
      http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=xOXAalLvp90&feature=related про эту систему которая только умеет дырявить микроволновки и застревает в картоне? wink
  15. Strabo
    +1
    27 December 2011 20: 34
    Damn, invent that the next war will be with spears and arrows. It would be better to think how to treat, and not how best to kill and cripple.
    1. 0
      27 December 2011 20: 46
      Yes, you are a respected pacifist!
  16. Grin
    0
    8 January 2012 21: 17
    Well, electric ignition is not a novelty, but the same OCA works in my opinion. So they will certainly replace the gunpowder, but they will put it on the stream in the next century.
  17. 0
    1 January 2015 13: 30
    I understand that all work in general is in the theory stage, not even experiments.