Rifle with the functions of a machine gun. FN HAMR

61


At the beginning of this century, the command of the US Marine Corps preoccupied itself with increasing the mobility of fighters and units by rearming them. Hitherto, the marines used M249 SAW as a light machine gun, a variant of the Belgian FN Minimi, modified to meet American requirements and manufactured in the United States under license. "Saw" and was supposed to be replaced by a new, more convenient weapon. In general, KPM was the first to hit upon the problem of firepower and mobility of units in this way: they ordered a kind of hybrid of a light machine gun and an assault rifle. Although sometimes there is an opinion that the marines simply wanted to get new infantry weapons without special economic and political problems - so they decided to replace the old M249, and not the new M4 rifles. The competition for the development of the replacement "Pila" was called very "original": IAR (Infantry Automatic Rifle - Infantry Automatic Rifle).

FN, Heckler-Koch and Colt submitted their applications for the competition. In the first company, or rather in its American department (FN USA), they decided to base on the already existing “in iron” rifle FN SCAR. After a number of improvements, designed to adapt the automatic mechanism to the features of the machine gun, the FN IAR project was “budding” from FN SCAR. As you can see, the company also decided not to philosophize about the name. Later, the weapon will be renamed, and it will be called FN HAMR (Heat Adaptive Modular Rifle - Modular rifle with thermal adaptation). Probably, now the rifle should have attracted a potential customer already at the title stage. Moreover, representatives of FN have not been tired of repeating every year that this very system of thermal adaptation is a revolutionary innovation, which in the future will become the standard for all weapons, and everyone will remember their company with a kind word.

What is an adaptation system? By default, the FN HAMR fires with the shutter closed. This is achieved shooting performance, acceptable for an assault rifle. You can shoot with both bursts and single shots. If a unit needs a machine gun, the fighter with the FN HAMR starts using his weapon in an appropriate way. Moreover, the rifle ammunition in the “machine-gun” mode can be carried out both from a regular box magazine on 30 cartridges, and from other designs that are compatible with the corresponding STANAG standard. So, for example, for the FN HAMR as a machine gun, the use of Beta C-Mag shops (two-drum for a hundred rounds) is most appropriate. However, in this case, the rifle, which has become a machine gun, will experience completely different temperature loads, which may have a very bad effect on the firing rates. In this case, FN USA came up with an interesting mechanism that regulates the operation of automation depending on the temperature of the rifle internals. Naturally, FN does not share its know-how, but the most likely and logical way to operate thermoregulation is as follows: a bimetallic plate contacts the rifle chamber, which, when a certain temperature is exceeded, “locks” the bolt in the rear position through the system. Shooting is now conducted, respectively, with an open shutter. Due to this, the air circulation in the receiver improves, and the temperature of the structure gradually decreases. Upon reaching the recommended mechanism releases the shutter and then the FN HAMR shoots “in an automatic way” from the closed shutter. The designers note that all these switchings occur fully automatically, without human intervention. So now the shooter does not need to monitor the number of shot rounds and replace the barrel in time.



With the exception of the temperature adaptation mechanism and the FN HAMR barrel, it is similar to the basic SCAR rifle in the light version. This weapon was created under the patron 5,56x45 mm of NATO. Automatics HAMR venting with a short stroke. The barrel is locked with the help of a pivotal larva on seven lugs. From the ancestor rifle, the HAMR has a double-block arrangement of the receiver. In the upper part, made of aluminum, the barrel and the mechanics of the bolt are fixed, and in the lower part of the polymer - the trigger mechanism, the pistol grip and the receiver of the stores. The rifle barrel with temperature adaptation, like the SCAR, is removable, but has a large wall thickness - again, in order to withstand the increased temperature loads. The trigger mechanism FN HAMR allows you to fire single shots and bursts, adjusting the length of the last designers have not provided. The three-position flag of the translator of fire (blocking USM, single, automatic), as on a large number of modern types of weapons, is located on both sides above the pistol grip, which allows you to switch it with both hands. Also, for the convenience of left-handed shooters, the possibility of quick and easy rearrangement of the loading handle on the left side (initially located on the right) is provided. To do this, on both sides of the receiver there are slots, and on the gate - holes for the handle. In addition, the store latch has buttons on both sides. In order that the left-handed shooter did not injure the face of the departing sleeve, there is a reflector detail in the rear part of the ejection window.

At the factory, the FN HAMR rifle is completed with folding aiming devices consisting of a diopter rear sight and an open front sight. The first has an adjustment of the firing range. Butt, like SCAR, folding (right) and can be adjusted in length. The modularity of the name on the HAMR is provided by three Picatinny strips: at the top of the receiver, under the forend and on its left side. In addition to the "tactical body kit," they can be mounted with a grenade launcher FN EGLM, designed specifically for the SCAR line. According to unconfirmed reports, the factory-equipped FN HAMR has an additional front handle that folds into a two-legged bipod for using the weapon in machine gun mode.

Rifle with the functions of a machine gun. FN HAMR


In 2009, according to the results of comparative tests, the United States Marine Corps Competition Commission recommended the adoption of the Heckler-Koch M27 assault rifle. In a number of sources there is information that prior to 2014, the Commission will receive 6-7 thousands of copies of Heckler-Koch. At the same time, it is impossible to exclude the possibility that the marines will decide to purchase Belgian-American rifles, because the IAR competition was, first of all, an experiment on changing the structure of units. If the experiment is considered successful, then it is quite possible to purchase the FN HAMR, especially since by that time the rifle will have time to finally bring it to mind.
61 comment
Information
Dear reader, to leave comments on the publication, you must sign in.
  1. Igor
    +8
    17 December 2011 09: 09
    Class !!! This is the thing, if you want a machine gun or an automatic machine, just rearrange the parts, and if you want to shoot an under-barrel grenade launcher with an automatic machine or blind yourself a separate grenade launcher.
    1. VALENOK
      0
      18 December 2011 15: 57
      Pay attention to what his strong recoil is, to the left upward, and the instructor shoots lying when the whole body mass extinguishes the recoil, it is not without reason that he shows the names of the lying, without showing us long lines. This suggests that this sample is poorly adapted to heap shooting with a dense vision of fire at the target.
  2. -8
    17 December 2011 09: 51
    Crap! AK - BETTER!
    1. +5
      17 December 2011 10: 19
      Try to make from Kalash - a sniper at a distance of up to 800 meters, it turns out from Scara, but from Kalash - alas, no:

      FN SCAR-L STD (Standard)

      FN SCAR-L SV (Sniper Variant)
      1. -4
        17 December 2011 14: 05
        my dear friend! on AK-74M there is a side loading onto which 1П29 (TULIP) clings or any optics
        1. NovoSibirets
          +4
          17 December 2011 14: 48
          Not from a good life, this filling. So as not to change the cover of the receiver!
          My opinion is that this option is more convenient and practical. The influx is great rubbing your back, but this is not the main thing, the straps will allow you to use any body kit, including that removed from the enemy, to customize it on your own. This is buzzing.

          1. -2
            17 December 2011 15: 28
            I didn’t rub me! But my nose with an aim when I crawled broke
            1. NovoSibirets
              +1
              17 December 2011 15: 31
              Quote: kosmos84
              here’s nose when sight crawled broke

              Move it a little bit on the bars yes? )))))
              But the influx does not give such an opportunity.
              Stop! When crawling!))) Well, here excuse me, you need to hold it right!)))
      2. Mr. Truth
        0
        18 December 2011 11: 31
        No 5,56 barrel as a sniper can pull at 800 meters.
    2. Ion coaelung
      -1
      17 December 2011 20: 39
      Kalashnikov assault rifles of series 101, 103, 107 and 108 have an aiming range of 1000 m.
      All machines of the hundredth series have side-folding plastic stocks and a standard side bar for mounting brackets for various sights (optical, collimator, night). In the 107th and 108th series, a great advantage is given to the modified design of the automation, which received a second gas piston with a mass counter mounted on its stem, and a synchronizing device located between the bolt frame and the balancer, which can significantly improve the characteristics of the weapon when firing bursts of any length, compared to traditional machines.

      1. +5
        17 December 2011 20: 59
        Attention! You do not have permission to view hidden text.

        And what needs to be hung on him, what would he hit at such a range? hyperion? Do not tell, SVD with domestic optics up to 1000 m on target, not counting snipers (specialists), very few people can get ...
        1. NovoSibirets
          0
          17 December 2011 21: 06
          Nothing. Put the AK aside, take the PKK and put optics on it. Harm also without an elongated barrel, and without optics will not take such a distance. Well, in general, the distance is certainly not for an automatic rifle!
  3. dred
    +1
    17 December 2011 10: 32
    AK-47 and its modifications are outdated for a long time, even AK-12 doesn’t help; there’s no sense in changing the soap. We need to adopt something new, either Aek-973 or, at worst, Ak-107.
    1. NovoSibirets
      +2
      17 December 2011 16: 53
      Quote: dred
      even ak-12 will not help here

      Quote: dred
      It is necessary to take into service something new, either the Aek-973 or, at worst, the ak-107.


      Here are those times! And how are your Aek and AK-107 different from AK? )))

      AK-107




      Fundamentally only a balanced mechanism!
      So he is present in the AK-12, as far as infa faithful appeared ...
      1. 0
        17 December 2011 21: 07
        Fundamentally only a balanced mechanism!

        The gears turned out to be too dumb (more dumb than the abocan cables), so for now HZ, what kind of machine will be the future weapon of the RF Armed Forces, I think the AK74M, as well as earlier models ...
        1. NovoSibirets
          -1
          17 December 2011 21: 09
          Yes, I also heard, but I also heard that it is disposable. We will see.
  4. Igor
    +5
    17 December 2011 11: 09
    Yes, it’s just that we have only old people left in the weapons bureaus whose machines have been making weapons since the war, there is no production of high-quality plastic, the youth do not stay there for a long time with such salaries, and what about the elderly, they have already created their 20th century machine gun for which they honor and praise, for 60 years it was finalized and modernized and it was the best in its class, but I think it’s already difficult for them to create something new if they will create a new machine based on the good old AK, that the latest news confirm this, and ours MO does not give them technical assignments. Probably a military secret smile
  5. +4
    17 December 2011 11: 28
    Undoubtedly, a very good trunk. Modular design, plastic, soft automation.
    And they can do this with us, but we don’t print a dollar, so we don’t allocate extra money for this!
  6. wk
    0
    17 December 2011 12: 54
    [in harsh conditions of protracted hostilities, it is too early to write off such a reliable MACHINE as an AK, and change it to catchy screwdrivers with an elegant plastic body kit, and really not containing any news!
  7. wk
    +3
    17 December 2011 13: 00
    Quote: dred
    AK-47 and its modifications are outdated for a long time, even AK-12 doesn’t help; there’s no sense in changing the soap. We need to adopt something new, either Aek-973 or, at worst, Ak-107.





    in harsh war conditions, it’s too early to write off such a reliable MACHINE as the AK, and change it to catchy screwdrivers with an elegant plastic body kit.
    1. NovoSibirets
      +11
      17 December 2011 14: 34
      Absolutely in the hole! It is completely unknown how this "violin" will behave in our harsh conditions! When there is no hot coffee and weapons have to be cleaned and repaired in the trench, at a temperature of -20 - 30 degrees! And AK will do its job!
      Shoot from it, but into the snow, or into the swamp mud! The complex mechanism is icing up and everything, hello partisan! )) Well, I do not. War is not a show in front of a photographer!
      My choice is AK, under 5,56, with slats, grenade launcher and calimator. I don’t even insist on a balanced scheme, since I was taught to shoot at "22", not to tumble the floor of the horn unnecessarily.
      Something like that:

  8. Igor
    +3
    17 December 2011 13: 42
    wk,
    Yes, no one says that if they write off Kalash, let them be stored in warehouses for up to an hour X, you need to gradually switch to a new machine, of course we don’t have a printing press like Amers’s, but you can first equip contractors, special military units such as special forces, airborne forces, marines, and then it’s already possible to keep up with the smoothly rearm infantry until 2025.
    1. NovoSibirets
      +1
      17 December 2011 15: 40
      Quote: Igorek
      need to gradually switch to a new machine

      Which one specifically?
  9. wk
    +2
    17 December 2011 13: 53
    Quote: Igorek
    until 2025 you can meet it.

    "Wait to attack us until 2025, we have not had time to rearm yet" - what if tomorrow is a war? re-arm "well, but seriously, of course new developments are needed.
    1. +4
      17 December 2011 14: 42
      and if tomorrow is war?

      SKS, AK, AKM, AKMS, PC, PKM from mobile warehouses at your service ...
  10. NovoSibirets
    +3
    17 December 2011 14: 51
    And here by the way sea quotes in Astana. )))

    1. 0
      17 December 2011 15: 23
      Left and right are made in Nevada, according to Bulgarian technology, in the center of HZ ...
      1. NovoSibirets
        +2
        17 December 2011 15: 29
        From this they did not cease to be AK, right?
        1. 0
          20 December 2011 10: 44
          True, there is a Chinese version of rhino-trimmed wink
          http://ipkins.ru/post148571736
  11. 0
    17 December 2011 15: 05
    It will overheat if it works like a machine gun, there is a lot of advertising, IMHO of course, but it sounds flimsy like that, it will fuck you or just spit, it’s going to the kraynyak after the 50th cartridge and it’s all
    1. +1
      17 December 2011 15: 24
      I don’t know, the Americans laid out on YouTube - 6 horns without stopping, only the forend caught fire ...
    2. Igor
      +1
      17 December 2011 15: 29
      The Scar that comes with a short barrel there is a standard caliber 5.56, and the long Scar uses a 7.62 cartridge, which gives it more power and you can dazzle it with a PSih2097 sniper rifle in the picture, I don’t think that a store with 250 rounds of ammunition is likely to go to it normal at 30.
      1. +1
        17 December 2011 15: 36
        the sniper skar has the letter L - light 5.56 mm, and the heavy one under 7.62 has the letter - H.
        1. Igor
          +1
          17 December 2011 15: 54
          Quote: PSih2097
          the sniper skar has the letter L - light 5.56 mm, and the heavy one under 7.62 has the letter - H.

          I repent confused
  12. Igor
    0
    17 December 2011 15: 07
    NovoSibirets,
    It is completely unknown how this "violin" will behave in our harsh conditions!
    What TTX designers will ask this violin so it will work, if you need to fight in outer space with this violin, then I think such a machine will make the question only the price, now they make counterguerrilla weapons, before they needed a weapon like AK when the two most powerful armies could clash at any moment.
    And for those AKs that are depicted in the picture, they have the same drawbacks as their predecessors.
    1. NovoSibirets
      +1
      17 December 2011 15: 25
      Quote: Igorek
      What performance characteristics will the designers give to this fiddle so will it work

      Blessed are the believers! Designers suggest, and the real conditions of the battle have.
      Quote: Igorek
      before yes you needed a weapon like AK

      Such a weapon will always be in demand for the army! Not like all these "pills" that come out of nowhere and disappear into nowhere.
      Quote: Igorek
      AK, which are depicted in the picture, they have the same disadvantages as their predecessors.

      Which ones do you think?
      1. Igor
        +1
        17 December 2011 15: 49
        Quote: NovoSibirets
        Blessed are the believers! Designers suggest, and the real conditions of the battle have.

        So the weapon is created on the basis of real hostilities, there was a competition for a new machine in the scoop, but the scoop fell apart before it was created.
        Quote: NovoSibirets
        Such a weapon will always be in demand for the army! Not like all these "pills" that come out of nowhere and disappear into nowhere.

        Let it be in their warehouses with us 17.000.000 maybe seventeen armies to arm.
        Quote: NovoSibirets
        Which ones do you think?

        Accuracy and accuracy.
        1. NovoSibirets
          +2
          17 December 2011 16: 04
          Quote: Igorek
          So the weapon is created on the basis of real hostilities, in Sovka there was a competition for a new machine

          Actual hostilities have changed, but not for the infantry. A field is a field, a city is a city. Of course, under each condition of the battle it is preferable to have your own weapon, but this is not real. Even for amers. Modularity helps. But AK modularity does not exclude. They are working on it now, as far as I know. Keeping reliability.
          Quote: Igorek
          Accuracy and accuracy.

          Even taking into account that the performance characteristics of AKs are constantly improving, and in AK-12 they will be at the level of Western standards, they even now allow us to solve all the tasks. It is only necessary to provide the fighter with a good body kit. And enough for the infantry. Specura is another matter.
          1. Igor
            +4
            17 December 2011 16: 26
            Quote: NovoSibirets
            Actual hostilities have changed, but not for the infantry. A field is a field, a city is a city. Of course, under each condition of the battle it is preferable to have your own weapon, but this is not real. Even for amers. Modularity helps. But AK modularity does not exclude. They are working on it now, as far as I know. Keeping reliability.

            Nothing really has changed with our infantry, but with Amers they have changed, they have very well learned how to fight remotely and, God forbid, someday they will see this in our army.
            Quote: NovoSibirets
            Even taking into account that the performance characteristics of AKs are constantly improving, and in AK-12 they will be at the level of Western standards, they even now allow us to solve all the tasks. It is only necessary to provide the fighter with a good body kit. And enough for the infantry. Specura is another matter.

            Well, at least she is the most combat-ready with us.
            1. NovoSibirets
              +1
              17 December 2011 16: 38
              Quote: Igorek
              but the amers have changed, they have very well learned how to fight remotely

              ))) What is it like? On the internet ?!
              Or that they approached, met resistance, withdrew, called in aircraft and won? So what? Or a drone gamer shot an infantry column and ate cake ?! May be! This has nothing to do with small arms!
              What distance are we talking about?
              Quote: Igorek
              intelligence they have god forbid

              Who or what do you mean by intelligence?
              1. Igor
                0
                17 December 2011 17: 19
                [quote = NovoSibirets] Only to small arms this has nothing to do [/ quote
                As far as amers have it, they even make automatic machines for themselves based on their doctrine of distance war, of course, in close combat on the drum, what do you have in your hands AK or Skar, but at a distance of 150 meters it will be clearly on Skar’s side?

                [quote = NovoSibirets] Who or what do you mean by intelligence? [/ quote]
                Satellites, drones, thermal imagers and night vision devices (almost every fighter) .Have you ever seen Amer columns with armored vehicles shoot from mountains in Afghanistan, unlike us when we had combat experience in Afghanistan, they stepped on the same rake in Chechnya.
                1. NovoSibirets
                  +2
                  17 December 2011 17: 39
                  Quote: Igorek
                  but at distances of meters with 150 advantages will be clearly on the side of Skar

                  Igor, sorry for the question, you probably served in the army, remember this exercise with the AK "shooter in the window opening"? Remind me at what distance is the target positioned?
                  And we green cadets fell it at a time. So what is the advantage of SCAR over AK at a distance of 150 meters? Yes, nothing. In battle, it is only possible to aim faster due to the presence of a caliber sight. And that’s it, this distance is for AK seeds.
                  Quote: Igorek
                  Satellites, drones, thermal imagers and NVD (almost every fighter)

                  This is demagoguery, Igorek. All this has nothing to do with the problem we are considering. - "The sufficiency of the TTX AK for conducting a competitive battle, and the advantage of foreign models over it" Something like that. True?
                  Thermal imagers and NVDs are naturally an advantage! You can’t argue here, well, let’s make them, unify them in our small arms, which we’ll also improve, and not look at the West in a ritual trance)) Do you agree? Moreover, their samples are not impressive, and are not tested by Russian conditions, which is very important.
                  1. Igor
                    +1
                    17 December 2011 19: 00
                    Quote: NovoSibirets
                    Igor, sorry for the question, you probably served in the army, remember this exercise with the AK "shooter in the window opening"? Remind me at what distance the target is located? And we, green cadets, brought it down at a time. So what is the advantage of SCAR over AK at a distance of 150 meters? Yes, nothing. In battle, only in the ability to aim faster due to the presence of a calimator sight. And that's all, this distance is for AK seeds.

                    Although I served in the army for 1 year, I don’t know the exercises like ARROW IN THE WINDOW OPENING; I generally only pulled 3 bullets for the whole service after training, like my whole call, the world financial crisis was not rounds then. recourse
                    Quote: NovoSibirets
                    and not look in a ritual trance to the West

                    Yes, I don’t urge you to look like that, I don’t say that we need the exact same rifle, we just have some kind of deficit of ideas or some kind of uncertainty, some say we need a new machine gun, while others always shout why we need a new machine gun we are served in the army alone and the dengirates cannot even be trusted with a stick, and in the new machine there will be 3 parts more than in the Kalash.
                    Quote: NovoSibirets
                    This is demagoguery, Igorek. All this has nothing to do with the problem we are considering. - "The sufficiency of the TTX AK for conducting a competitive battle, and the advantage of foreign models over it" Something like that. True? Thermal imagers and night vision devices are a natural advantage! You can't argue here, well, let's make them, unify them in our small arms, which we will also improve, and not look to the West in a ritual trance)) Do you agree? Moreover, their samples are not impressive, and have not been tested in Russian conditions, which is very important.

                    I agree, this is demagogy, in short we will wait for the new AK-12
                    1. NovoSibirets
                      0
                      17 December 2011 19: 25
                      The target is located 300 meters away! So 150 for AK is a trifle. A good kalimator would have seen the enemy, quickly jumped up - "at home"! ))

                      Quote: Igorek
                      generally for the entire service only 3 bullets pulnul after training


                      But this is definitely a disaster! As if they were afraid of barrel wear, or they saved ammunition! It's ridiculous! Warehouses are stocked, to the eyeballs! Evil takes. To teach a fighter to shoot is already more than half the battle! He will work wonders from AK. Learn only! Some kind of sabotage!

                      Quote: Igorek
                      we will wait for the new AK-12


                      Yes, I was already puzzled, almost every day I use the search engine, maybe the infection seemed!)))

                      I see you are a person interested, here are a couple of links interesting on the topic, and of course the comments to them are certainly no less interesting and informative. Get a sign. )))

                      http://kungurov.livejournal.com/35438.html
                      in four parts.

                      http://werewolf0001.livejournal.com/8941.html

                      (a lot of criticism of the AK, by the way)))
  13. +1
    17 December 2011 15: 45
    with their plastic butt eblo enemies do not smash
    1. Igor
      0
      17 December 2011 15: 52
      Quote: kosmos84
      with their plastic butt eblo enemies do not smash

      Good old practice, we throw a hurricane at our corpses.
      1. +3
        17 December 2011 15: 56
        there is always a chance of hand-to-hand fighting, and there the butt and knife and glade are irreplaceable
    2. bogdan_z
      0
      26 December 2011 17: 07
      If the American commander allowed melee - he will go to trial. And the soldier has a gun for emergency situations.
      1. 0
        3 March 2012 11: 52
        if it comes out of melee safely and reaches the courthouse! What is unlikely! The Americans, in the infantry, practically do not teach hand-to-hand combat. So, a trifle, the basics, to at least know something! and they believe that a bayonet-knife to the rifle is not needed!
  14. Igor
    +1
    17 December 2011 16: 08
    Quote: kosmos84
    there is always a chance of hand-to-hand fighting, and there the butt and knife and glade are irreplaceable

    Kalash also has a plastic butt, and some even have a wooden butt, but you can think of a bayonet with a cannon for this gun
  15. n key
    +2
    17 December 2011 18: 13
    he’s not so sophisticated, so already about the fact that aka shoots everywhere and other machine guns are clogged, it’s time to move away from this thought.
  16. NovoSibirets
    +2
    17 December 2011 20: 50


    Incomplete disassembly.
    1. 0
      17 December 2011 20: 57
      By the way, with the help of one multitool ...
      1. NovoSibirets
        0
        17 December 2011 21: 00
        Do not understand? Can’t you make it out without him ?!
        Fun. If so, then the crap is full! Dances with tambourines will begin in the fields.
      2. bogdan_z
        0
        26 December 2011 17: 08
        Squeeze a pair of pegs with a cartridge. Which multitool?
    2. Igor
      0
      18 December 2011 08: 19
      Quote: NovoSibirets
      Incomplete disassembly.

      In my opinion, nothing complicated, the second barrel is also more painful here, I think in a real battle if it is jammed like Kalash, nobody will have to disassemble their machine gun in order to clean it, but I will read ATP for links.
      1. NovoSibirets
        0
        18 December 2011 10: 59
        Especially when you consider that incomplete disassembly is possible only with the butt removed))
        And the person above about the need for multitool for disassembly told. Nothing complicated in the field! )) God forbid, still in battle.
  17. 0
    17 December 2011 21: 20
    I shot both from the AK 100 series and from Abakan, from Kovrovsky, I liked Kovrovsky under 7.62 (5.45 - not much wrong), which was AEK 973, although the stocks were: telescopes - a la M16, full-fledged AK of the hundredth series and native. .. the first two - that’s it, the last one is not very good, but you can get used to it ... It runs exceptionally well, like AK ...
  18. saratt
    +1
    18 December 2011 00: 29
    everyone says you’d better say that he’s better not to be afraid of dirt, etc., what's the difference if you get shot before your bullets fly somehow meaningfully. Only high-class specialists can shoot well from the Kalash. Or do you think that with 30 rounds you can become a good shooter ?
    1. NovoSibirets
      0
      18 December 2011 10: 56
      saratt, with all due respect, while learning algebra, spelling, or what’s going on in schools right now, it’s too early for you to talk about these matters. He was piled up so that even answering was somehow inconvenient ..
  19. German
    +1
    18 December 2011 04: 15
    one of the gunsmiths (sorry I do not remember) said: it’s difficult, simple to do. but to make it simple is difficult!
    1. 0
      18 December 2011 13: 13
      Attributed to many, but most likely it is Shpagin.
  20. zavesa01
    +2
    18 December 2011 16: 43
    The future is with modular weapons. (Personal opinion)
  21. 0
    19 December 2011 17: 03
    Actually, I wanted to talk about a new tactical weapon for the USCM. The Marines know exactly what they want. The Belgians proposed a solution, the design, as it turned out, was not finalized.
    By the way, the "Pecheneg" machine gun uses forced cooling of the barrel by "blow-blow" shutter.
    1. 0
      19 December 2011 18: 25
      There is not a shutter, but a flame arrester. When firing, gases passing through the flame arrester "pump" air through the barrel casing. Intake windows on the casing under the carrying handle.