New Czech machine CZ-805 BREN

42
New Czech machine CZ-805 BREN


Recently, in many modern foreign armies, a need has arisen for a modular infantry weapons variable configuration, with the possibility of its adaptation to various combat situations, depending on the task. The development of this small arms has been going on for quite some time, today many examples of modular small arms are known, such as the Belgian SCAR, the Italian ARX-160 and the sample of American gunsmiths Bushmaster ACR. Czech developers and arms manufacturers did not stand aside from developments in this promising direction.

Back in 2009, during the IDET exhibition, they presented their new creation to the public - the CZ-805 BREN assault rifle, made by the well-known Cheska Zbrojovka weapons company in Uherske Brod. The same model of small arms in the same year won the competition of the Ministry of Defense of the Czech Republic for the supply of weapons as part of the re-equipment of all units of the Czech army planned for the coming years. It is assumed that it is the CZ-805 BREN that will replace the already outdated 7,62-mm automaton Sa. Vz. 58, also known as the “58 pattern,” adopted over 50 years ago. At the moment, it became known that the Czech Ministry of Defense ordered the first batch of new assault rifles, the delivery of which is scheduled for three years. Moreover, half of this batch of rifles should be placed in the armed forces of the Czech Republic by the end of 2011. So far, there are several hundred CZ-805 BREN 5,56 mm caliber units in the Czech Army used for training purposes.





At the recent presentation of the new CZ-805 BREN assault rifle, recently launched at the Libava test site, Alexander Vondra, the Czech defense minister, made several successful shots at the targets. After that, in his statement to the media representatives present at the presentation, he stated: “With my eyesight in 12 diopter 15, the target hit is quite a good result, which proves the excellent fighting qualities of the new machine gun”.

Assault rifle (automatic) CZ-805 BREN is a multi-caliber and modular design with a classic vapor-automatic with a gas piston, located above the barrel, and a rotary locking mechanism of the bolt. The barrel box of the machine gun is made of aluminum alloy, to which the firing-trigger mechanism with a pistol grip and an interchangeable magazine mount are fastened to the bottom. Cocking the shutter can be done on both sides of the rifle, since the handle is installed on either side. This, according to the manufacturers, is made for the convenience of shooting "left-handed" fighters. Also, a fuse and a firing mode switch are installed on both sides, with the possibility of switching to a single shot, shooting in long or short bursts (two shots each).



All assault rifles are equipped with quick-change air-cooling trunks, if necessary, you can quickly change the barrel, the shaft of the store, the bolt-locking mechanism, thereby remaking the machine for 7,62 mmx39, 5,56 mm (NATO standard) or 6,8 mm Rem SPC. A replaceable mine for a shop allows you to use the most diverse NATO standards for shooting. The gun’s rate of fire is 750 rounds per minute, firing range (sighting) from 500 meters, depending on the length of the replacement barrel used. The automatic, in addition to those already installed on the special grounds of the diopter pillar and the front sight, can be equipped with sights of various types, both night and day. The possibility of installing a “tactical silencer” (a device for low-noise firing) is provided on the barrel of the machine gun. The standard automaton shop is made of durable transparent plastic, so that it is possible to control the consumption of cartridges, which is an important factor in the transience and intensity of modern combat. The length-adjustable plastic butt folds to the side on the right side or can be removed from the machine. In addition to the assault rifle, a bayonet knife specially designed for it or a CZ G 805 grenade launcher can be mounted.



Currently, there are three versions of the CZ-805 BREN assault rifle: the standard version (CZ-805 BREN A1), designed for the 5,56 mm cartridge, the 360 mm barrel length, the shortened-barrel version (CZ-805 BREN A2) and the third version (CZ-805 BREN A3) with an extended barrel for use as a machine gun or sniper rifle, equipped with a removable bipod and a tactical flashlight. The weight of the standard version is 3,6 kg, length with folded butt 670 mm.
42 comments
Information
Dear reader, to leave comments on the publication, you must sign in.
  1. Alexey Prikazchikov
    +2
    18 November 2011 07: 39
    Well, why ours cannot do the same sad damn it really even the Czechs in small arms began to overtake us, the Slavs were also male, otherwise we were rushing about with our abakan, but what good was it ...
    1. +17
      18 November 2011 08: 00
      The Czechs are technically very savvy guys, "even the Czechs" is not the correct wording. It may be "even Poles, Hungarians and Romanians," but the Czechs, in this regard, cannot be underestimated.
      1. +9
        18 November 2011 11: 07
        Quote: VadimIS
        Chekhov, in this regard, cannot be underestimated.


        CZ has always been a world-class company.
        1. vadimus
          +1
          19 November 2011 01: 07
          Nice and relevant
    2. Tjumenec72
      +11
      18 November 2011 08: 28
      IMHO
      - we design trunks elderly people (in the sense of the old canons) youth (with innovations) do not go (salary is not very)
      - MO doesn’t give TK (without TK you don’t want to do it at your own peril and risk) and it wants a child prodigy for a penny (or rather, “I don’t know what I want, but you surprise me, and I can later pay”)
      - The Czech Republic is a small country and not a lot of machine guns are needed, therefore, it can afford to purchase "expensive" weapons in small quantities. Accordingly, he designs with such a calculation.

      Conclusion - we need a systematic approach, we need a confident desire of the Ministry of Defense.
  2. SAVA555.IVANOV
    +3
    18 November 2011 07: 47
    In the courtyard of the 21st century !!! Many technologies are no longer a secret. For example, China. And still, our boobies neither cars nor machines can do anything, not to mention computers, etc., etc., It’s disgusting
    1. Alexey Prikazchikov
      +4
      18 November 2011 08: 05
      It’s not computers that have started making true laptops for the military on the basis of Elbrus and supercomputers, but the journey of 1000 miles begins with the first step
      http://sdelanounas.ru/blogs/9078/ вот ссылка но это так пример мобилы делать первые началиhttp://sdelanounas.ru/blogs/9613/

      http://www.sdelanounas.ru/blogs/9080/ вот ссылка на новую стратегию ваза если все выгорит то будет просто заебись[
      so it’s not so bad, but with weapons and me, our developers here began to strain me, although I think we will someday make such beauty.
    2. +1
      20 November 2011 05: 13
      -Out of the 21st century !!! Many technologies are no longer a secret. For example, China. And still, our boobies neither cars nor machines can do anything, not to mention computers, etc., etc., It’s disgusting

      Just a fool? Our machines, for example, are buying UWB.
      1. SAVA555.IVANOV
        +1
        20 November 2011 06: 05
        antosha have you ever been to the factory ?? look at them there are manufacturers. what do you wear and what do you eat? then give examples. and if you want to explain something? then explain to me why VAZ hired a former volvo designer? no need to go far at what computer are you sitting woodpecker ??? if only the "mice" were produced or disassembled and ripped apart at least one Toyota. and our machines are bought for further remelting. for OUR citizens it is necessary to produce and not for UWB
        1. tehotdeloren
          +1
          9 February 2012 17: 13
          Dear SAVA555.IVANOV / if it's not a secret, have you ever considered calculating for some product? there are such items as: depreciation charges, etc. So, in Russia they are one of the highest, because our WINTER is very long and we will not be able to compete with Koreans and Chinese. This is me for the production of "MOUSE" ...
  3. +9
    18 November 2011 07: 59
    Why are citizens whining! ??? is that a miracle blaster! ???? just a barrel - not tested, but advertised! and in general I did not understand: - "firing range (sighting) from 500 meters"how is it! ?????? but you can't get closer! ??? wink are you talking about Staer, too, screaming when he appeared !? - there are also for left-handed people, for right-handed people and interchangeable trunks! - and what! ????? half the world is still fighting with AK, and obviously not from cheapness - bow and spear will be cheaper! (alarmists you)
    1. Alexey Prikazchikov
      -5
      18 November 2011 08: 07
      It’s just a shame that our dodges are all running around with their fucking aeks and abakans and
      1. +5
        18 November 2011 09: 18
        everything has its time - how many Chekhov should be armed - and how many of ours! ??? (the need for a modular barrel expensive for bells and whistles for artillerymen and drivers, grenade launchers and signalmen, and others is expensive, and the combined arms assault rifle should be one, it will simply ruin the country, you must first create, verify and justify rearmament) and this is a work by Chekhov - for now only a novelty, that's when it will show itself in hostilities - we will compare and if that envy
      2. Staff_
        +2
        18 November 2011 09: 43
        AEK will be better, except for the removable barrel, the Chekhov machine has no more advantages.
        1. Alexey Prikazchikov
          0
          18 November 2011 11: 52
          And ergonomics ???
    2. +7
      18 November 2011 15: 16
      Quote: Dart Weyder
      what do citizens whine! ??? Is that a miracle blaster! ????


      Well, it looks very similar



      This is an FN SCAR assault rifle
      1. +4
        18 November 2011 15: 28
        so it turns out - just PLAGIARISM or find 10 differences! wink (color and curled boutiques do not count)
        1. 0
          20 November 2011 05: 32
          -here and it turns out - just just PLAGIAT or find 10 differences!

          So, first of all, not an "assault rifle", but a machine gun. Secondly, as soon as I saw the photo, I thought: "Another development machine G-36." Although only amateurs judge by appearance, you need to look at what kind of mechanics there is. But I doubt that it is different from the same basic G-36 or Belgian assault rifle.

          And so:
          G-36 - based on automation with a gas engine with a short stroke of the gas piston (on the principle of removal of powder gases)

          SCAR is a gas engine with a short stroke of a gas piston separate from the gate frame.

          CheZet - classic gas vent automation.

          That is, what we see is a similar scheme of the mechanisms. Perhaps it was implemented in different ways, i.e. not 1 in 1. But something tells me that everything was licked by nemchury. By license. Or the Belgians. I can’t judge here, although I put it on the Bunduses, as more masterly.
          1. +1
            20 November 2011 06: 55
            dear Anton S, - I, as well as more than sure, the other participants in this forum are incredibly happy to see among us gray and illiterate in weapons practicing (or practicing) gunsmith in your face (it dawned on me about your qualifications right after the word DELETANTS!!!!!! and if it weren’t for your constructive criticism regarding the automation of the assault data .... excuse me - AUTOMATOV, - we would never know their differences, and the similarities - and the dog was buried in automation, as you correctly noticed! ,,,,,, although - if you had bothered to carefully study the sites, Wikipedia, or I don’t know where you get your knowledge from, but even without such an undeniable database of information I’ll say this - the difference between machine gun and assault rifle expressions - exists only in the languages ​​of countries and no more, and you corrected so beautifully:
            Anton STak-s, firstly, not an "assault rifle", but a machine gun.
            there are no other special design differences and knock-outs, and the automatic reloading system may have been taken taking into account previous experience, and, as an option, AK experience is locking the bore by turning the shutter, and rather massive parts, which increases reliability when clogged.
            Will you be so kind, the next time you give constructive (destructive) criticism, if you are not a gunsmith at work - to refrain from loud words like DELITANTS, and incorrect remarks about the inapplicability of the word assault rifle to the AUTOMATIC machine, I will be very glad!

            You have overestimated a lot of weapons in general! (of the present)
            1. 0
              29 February 2012 10: 09
              Wah, what a garach! Alas, I just read your message now. The fact that you took the word "dIletant" at your own expense speaks volumes. It is necessary to read carefully. In fact, we had no differences. And try to continue to make fewer mistakes, please, if, of course, you are not a banderlog from the Canadian country. And less youthful maximalism. Well, the fact that you mentioned pedagogy, I will leave this without a response. :-) I advise you to forget about it. In short, we read it once again on a sober head, if it's not immediately clear, it will come in handy for the future. Chessword, put yourself in an awkward position. Good luck.
  4. +9
    18 November 2011 09: 02
    Let them with their bagpipes go to Iraq or Afghanistan, fight, then we'll see.
  5. Artemka
    +1
    18 November 2011 09: 39
    Let's see what this rifle is worth.
  6. aleksandr1959
    +6
    18 November 2011 10: 05
    In 1980, he somehow hinted at the training ground (there were specialists from Izhmash) about the desirability of a transparent store, they sprayed saliva by 2 meters ... And Bren - the cars were successful.
  7. German
    +4
    18 November 2011 10: 08
    Czechs have always created interesting samples .... take the same "Scorpion" or "cheska zbroevka" .....
    1. Tyumen
      +2
      18 November 2011 18: 40
      Quote: German
      "cheska zbroevka" ..

      This is not a sample, but the plant itself. Cz
  8. +1
    18 November 2011 10: 24
    and what aek or abakan is bad?
    1. +1
      20 November 2011 23: 00
      Not for the conscript who came to serve the year .. And the Czechs know how to make weapons. A well-known company, by the way, make excellent pistols. It is very similar to SKAR, and indeed to ACR, and to HK416-417. For me, the main thing is reliability criterion
  9. +5
    18 November 2011 11: 31
    ..And in the end, most decided ... anyway, Kalash is better .. :-))))))))))))))
    there, too, for left-handed people, for right-handed people and interchangeable trunks! - and what! ????? half the world is still fighting with AK, and obviously not from cheapness - bow and spear will be cheaper! (alarmists you)

    crowbar argument
    1. +6
      18 November 2011 13: 14
      it’s just that the soldiers will soon be like women - who has a more glamorous barrel !!!!! the people on the strike are crazy - they attach a bunch of crap to a futuristic layout and go flaunting each other - who is more beautiful! fellow there are a lot of criteria by which weapons are evaluated - even looking at frequent reports from hot spots, special operations you can see what specialists from different countries of the world work with (especially since they don’t refuse weapons) - there are a lot of them strewn with sights, grenades, fanars and others device trunks !? - not at all - they have worthless financing! ??? don't think so! and this is for specialists - who, depending on the operation, can pick up weapons for themselves, but here they howl - so that they can rearm the whole army! great strategists !!!
  10. +1
    18 November 2011 12: 54
    According to the drawings, everything seems to be good. As always, one of the main characteristics - the "issue price" is hushed up. :)
  11. dred
    0
    18 November 2011 12: 57
    It hurts like a G36.
    1. +5
      18 November 2011 13: 03
      I will not be surprised at all if "inside" EVERYTHING is very similar.
  12. +5
    18 November 2011 13: 39
    Czechs of course masters - but this is almost a complete copy of the German wink
  13. +7
    18 November 2011 14: 12
    There are no new technical solutions. Modularity was implemented a very long time ago at the Austrian AUG. Body kits ... Look at guns.ru, how can you clone an AK clone, Saigu-MK, if you wish.
    In addition to modularity, we need new opportunities for accuracy in firing bursts, which was exactly what the Abakan competition consisted of. Reliability is also a very important indicator.
    I think the Czechs created a machine no worse than the G36.
    For our army, of course, we need a new machine gun, but I think it’s not worth going along the path of the Germans, Czechs and Israelis.
    A truly new machine must have at least two of the following attributes:
    1) modular design and good ergonomics - the trend of the times
    2) a new principle of automation. To date, balanced automation (AEK, AK107), in my opinion, is more optimal than automation with a movable carriage (AN94).
    3) new ammunition. Everything is very complicated here, as large financial costs are needed to switch to a new ammunition. You can recall the story with G11. But the transition to the new barrel-munition complex gives greater efficiency.
    1. Alexey Prikazchikov
      -4
      18 November 2011 16: 18
      I completely agree, but I think that abakan and aek are a dead end better than trying new ammunition without blasting need to experiment with cartridges all the same the barrel is it launch 4 the platform does all the main work the cartridge does the same job its accuracy is much higher than that of most barrels but its cartridge and it greatly worsens its characteristics I think that it is necessary to focus efforts on the new ammunition
      1. Charon
        +4
        19 November 2011 00: 34
        "... but I think that Abakan and Aek are a dead end, it is better to try new Blazgilz ammunition, it is necessary to experiment ..."

        They have already experimented with cartridgeless cartridges. Germans. As a result, they adopted the classic version of the assault rifle.

        About the dead end is also not worth it. Weaponry weapons almost reached the ceiling of excellence. Let not 100%, but 98%. To pull another 1%, you need to spend such efforts and money that this does not justify itself.
        What the Czechs did beautifully, but there is no qualitative leap in sight. By a qualitative leap, I mean, for example, the transition from a store rifle to a self-loading rifle.
        There is a new product in beautiful packaging that can be sold profitably. At least that's how I feel about it.
  14. makrus
    +5
    18 November 2011 16: 08
    Quote: saruman
    But the transition to the new barrel-munition complex gives greater efficiency.
    This is the most important thing, everything else is secondary. Until this point is implemented, we will not get decisive progress.
    From the fact that we have AK hundredth series are good, as a transitional option completely.
    Regarding body kits, I would like to note that on the German, G-36, no one catches it, because he is already good, the same can be attributed to AK 107. wink
  15. +4
    18 November 2011 21: 31
    The main idea - I think from here:

    Shop and stock - from here:

    We took two trunks and created something in between
    1. +2
      19 November 2011 01: 43
      I forgot to add about the bottom of the box, it is also copied from the G36, otherwise the store will not work, all the same Scar and Hk are different.
    2. 0
      18 February 2012 13: 18
      As far as I know, this CZ 805 Bren machine was tested with FN SCAR.
      http://ru.wikipedia.org/wiki/CZ_805
      http://world.guns.ru/assault/chex/cz-05-r.html
      It says he won the contest with FN SCAR. It is believed that it was created under the influence of the Belgian model, because SCAR appeared earlier.
      By the way. the modular design does not have to be similar to the FN SCAR - examples: Magpul Masada (former), Beretta ARX-160. And here, unfortunately, is very similar to the FN SCAR ... Although, if there are professionals, correct it.
  16. J_silver
    +1
    19 November 2011 00: 07
    Again, I do not understand what the hell should weapons be modular? What is convenience here? What a bunch of trash should be attached to each cartoon? Why change trunks? It is clear when interchangeable barrels for a machine gun are necessary, but for a machine gun or rifle? Weapons specialize in their intended purpose - so why bother the constructor? In battle, you will have no time to fool around with collecting a suitable device from Lego ...

    And these battery-powered batteries only look beautiful in the picture - in reality, the weight of all the necessary batteries will be greater than the weight of the cartridges, and charging sockets are rarely found in trenches, forests or mountains ...
    1. +2
      19 November 2011 01: 31
      Well, suppose a war has begun (God forbid, of course ...), they give you an AK74M, and (just suppose) you go into the RF arms, where you were sent according to the mobile prescription, and you see there is a gun shop, which isn’t there: both the AC and BCC and Kalash of all modifications, in all possible body kits, a bunch of snipers ... What do you personally take? A bunch of trunks? Or suppose that the MO sharply fell into place, and there is one barrel for one caliber, but with the possibility of use in almost any situation, although the army has two: Kalash and sniper up to 1 km ... IMHO I personally (if this happens someday) I prefer the second. War is not a stalker, it’s easier to drag a second barrel with a receiver and optics for something like that (ala skar) than Kalash and SVD ... From our AEK, but it will never become a sniper, although some work has been rumored but they were screwed up by MO ...
      In general, this is a dispute between the blind and the deaf, someone prefers a single trunk, someone modular ... there are advantages in both one and the other.
      1. J_silver
        +2
        19 November 2011 15: 50
        This is all talk about picking weapons for the task! We already discussed here that there may be several variants of the same weapon with interchangeable barrels - so why? Just changing the barrel of a machine gun in a sniper rifle can not be redone! The cartridge should be different - that means the whole automation is different, and the sniper isn’t particularly needed ... The design is complicated ... Just replacing the barrel with a machine gun doesn’t turn it into a machine gun - it's a different task if you consider that the machine gun is a means of amplification in any way units - again, the cartridge must be different, the design is more powerful ... the result - the weapon becomes more complicated, reliability drops, the cost grows, so it will be useful only to manufacturers ...
        1. 0
          20 November 2011 06: 08
          they forgot to add that by replacing the barrel, an attack soldier, or, according to our classification, a shooter, you cannot turn a sniper. Preparation is radically different.
  17. OvsyannikovVA
    +4
    19 November 2011 21: 45




    Speak plagiarism? Wash clearly sho brothers. Each country has its own M-16 of the XNUMXst century
    1. +3
      20 November 2011 07: 00
      I bayonet very reminiscent of something old, and familiar ...... not really from Kalashnikov !? wink
      1. +1
        18 February 2012 13: 30
        According to the illustrated reference book, Weapons of Modern Infantry, S. Fedoseyev, the bayonet-knife for the G-36 was borrowed from the AK-74 analogue manufactured by the German Democratic Republic.
  18. Cardamom
    +2
    20 November 2011 00: 15
    Gentlemen, there is no point in arguing! A small, high-tech and expensive machine gun is, of course, the lot of the rapid reaction units, that is, the Special Forces. If this is an operation in the forest - one story, if in urban conditions, as a rule, it is somewhat different. In Russia, first of all, weapons that are not expensive to manufacture and easy to maintain are needed, because in the event of a war (GOD DON'T !!!), the calculation, again, will be for a large army, that is, you need to equip immediately so as not to lie, a million a person for example (although who knows how much, depending on whom we will fight with soap) and that everyone immediately understands him. And the whole Czech Republic in terms of population, like Moscow, or even less. So they rely on special forces, and since they themselves produce excellent barrels, it means that they buy cheaper from themselves and may well afford all sorts of "trinkets". And regarding the modern barrel, we can say that the main convenience in operation and reliability, for example, the Israelis gave birth to "Tavor". It is difficult to judge how good it is, but they fumble about it.
  19. 0
    20 November 2011 06: 31
    Squeak she is squeak, although the Czechs are savvy in technology. Just as they still do not understand, their whole notion, albeit even in demand and good, .... nobody will need a turbulence while they are in NATO. All this joy is only in the mode of exhibition samples for stripping technologies, or for small-scale production for special services ... The quality determines the production, and piece samples for gourmets .... They went to the west - so imitate an orgasm
  20. 0
    20 November 2011 06: 38
    One bullet can release one bullet at a time, and ten out of ten. That's the whole explanation of why the military and even hunters have been using a variety of multi-barrel weapons for centuries. More trunks - more killing effect. Why, then, is not all generally small arms multilateral? Firstly, with a large number of trunks it is more difficult to manage (clean there, charge); secondly, several trunks are heavier than one; thirdly, sometimes it’s necessary not to kill everyone more, but to incapacitate someone specifically without hitting temporarily innocent people. Nevertheless, the desire to make fun straight from the hands so that nothing is left of the enemy, even for the funeral, now and then returns the inventors of weapons to multi-barreled schemes. We already told you about the American Liberator and Defender, and today we will briefly talk about the three-barreled brainchild of German Alexandrovich Korobov - the TKB-059 volley fire machine (aka “3B device”; by the way, we have one beautiful machine gun of this designer here already flickered). If you had to shoot from a machine gun and see what the target turns into when you release only one 30 round of cartridges at it, and most importantly, how quickly this can happen if you shoot in a long burst, try to imagine that you have three machine, whose mechanisms are reduced to one trigger hook. Presented? Now, if you build one, the effect will be almost TKB-059. “Almost” - because Korobov in the distant 1962 year did not just combine three barrels - he tried to achieve the fastest possible shooting from each of them. The line should have been so swift that the machine did not have time to deviate from the recoil. Thanks to this, as well as, of course, to three trunks, in state tests, miracle weapons showed unprecedented accuracy, plus the rate of fire of the 1400 — 1800 rounds per minute. The State Commission, however, the machine seemed too sophisticated. In addition, the army already had AKM and there was no particular need to change it to something else, albeit a three-barrel one.

  21. 0
    20 November 2011 06: 45

    TKB-059 (“3B device”) is the Soviet experimental three-barrel assembly machine “Bullpap”, developed by German Aleksandrovich Korobov in 1962 under the standard cartridge of 7,6239 mm caliber.

    During development, the stake was placed on an ultrafast turn, in which the machine did not have time to deviate from the recoil, which would ensure a high accuracy of fire. Combining several barrels in one weapon allowed the launch of multiple launch rockets. The rate of fire at the same time increased to 1400 — 1800 rounds per minute. To unify the machine, some parts and components were borrowed from AK.

    In state trials, thanks to the almost simultaneous shot of three rounds in the line, the machine gun really showed extremely high accuracy. However, the specificity of the design, the complexity of the equipment of the built-up stores, as well as the lack of demand for replacing the AKM, determined the refusal to accept this model for service.
    TKB-059
    3B device
    Type: automatic
    Country: Union of Soviet Socialist Republics of the USSR
    Service history
    Years of operation: was not adopted
    History of production
    Designer: German Korobov
    Designed: 1962 year
    Producer: TsKIB SOO
    Features
    Weight, kg: 4,3
    Cartridge: 7,6239 mm
    Caliber, mm: 7,62
    Principles of operation: removal of powder gases
    Rate of fire
    rounds / min: 1400 — 1800
    Type of ammunition: a built-up box magazine on 30 cartridges
    Sight: open

  22. J_silver
    0
    20 November 2011 20: 00
    In the pictures, robotic clowns - would I look at them in the late autumn, turning into winter, in a couple of weeks in the trenches ... I wonder how he is going to shoot a rifle with an optical sight at a fast-running enemy, and staying under fire does not contribute to slowness? This is not a white sahib on a hunt in Africa in a nature reserve, where he will put a fight and a tripod for him, and he will hold the second and the target by the rope ...
  23. 0
    3 December 2011 23: 54
    Modularity, in my opinion, is a good thing. Take, for example, the Masada ACR. Changing the barrel and magazine, you can use cartridges for AK. And, accordingly, on the contrary, 5,56