The return of reusable spacecraft

30
The return of reusable spacecraft

Roskosmos placed an order for the development of a preliminary design, which is most likely to be carried out by the Khrunichev Center. The space agency allocates 250 million rubles and allocates two years to the project of a new type of transport.

The lot, put up for tender, is called “reusable space launch system of the first stage” (MRKS-1). The discussion is about the development of a universal returnable first stage with the possibility of use for various spacecraft. The stage will deliver into the reference orbit (200 kilometers) 7 –60 tons of payload. To overcome this distance, most of the fuel and energy of modern launch vehicles goes away. Having reached the reference orbit, the reusable medium should be separated and automatically returned.



After separation, the outputted spacecraft continues on its way further or offline (if the low near-earth orbit is the target), or will fly further using the second and third stages.

The idea of ​​a transport system like the MRX-1 was formulated about 10 years ago. In many ways, a similar project, called “Baikal-Angara”, was presented by the Khrunichev Space Center. The goal of the project is to create a rocket accelerator, which, after separation from the carrier, automatically returns to the home airport. According to the developers, this method of removal will help in solving the problem of pollution of the planet with waste steps, and will also reduce the cost of putting the payload into orbit by 25 – 50%.

In an interview with Izvestia, Anatoly Kuzin, deputy. General Director of "Center Khrunichev", said that the company will participate in the tender.

“We have been conducting this topic for a long time, and over the past few years the project has been developed as a research project,” said Kuzin. - It is necessary to understand that while we are talking about the development of the project, and the creation of the carrier itself will be carried out not earlier than 2020 of the year. Such a system of breeding, in our opinion, is economically justified and promising. We are working to eliminate the shortcomings of reusable spacecraft developed earlier - their high cost of inter-flight service and heavy thermal protection.

According to Ivan Moiseev, the scientific director of the Space Policy Institute, the issue of creating a spacecraft of this type will not become relevant in the coming decades:

- There are no tasks for which this system is needed. Now it makes no sense to make reusable ships, since the start of the project requires too large capital investments, says Moiseyev. - We donated money for research - well, but most likely it will not come to practical creation. A significant amount is needed for an unknown product that may not pay off in the end. American shuttles are a vivid example. They would pay off at the weekly start. In our case, the same problem - because in those. Roscosmos mission is about 20 launches per year.

Vitaly Lopota, General Designer of RSC Energia, believes that the economic component will be decisive in the fate of the project.

- Reusable rockets and ships can be created only if they are cheap. The rocket services of the total cost of the mission amount to 20 – 30%, says Lopota. - Now only promising components of missiles are being made, and not promising carriers. Creating a new rocket is relevant only if we want to fly into space.

The documents for the competition contain the requirement to work out the options for the take-off / landing of the complex from all the cosmodromes at the disposal of Russia: the existing Baikonur, Plesetsk, as well as the designed Vostochny.
30 comments
Information
Dear reader, to leave comments on the publication, you must sign in.
  1. Zhenya88
    0
    17 November 2011 19: 47
    But what about Buran ???
  2. +7
    17 November 2011 19: 58
    finally we return to the "Buran", the "ENERGIA-BURAN" system is very reliable, but it was also very expensive even for the USSR
    1. vadimus
      0
      19 November 2011 01: 01
      It's time to leave for a breakthrough
  3. +6
    17 November 2011 20: 01
    The main thing is not to stop R&D and maintain the production base.
    If necessary, then in a short time, you can implement a similar program.
    1. +4
      17 November 2011 21: 15
      Quote: Ivan Tarasov
      If necessary, then in a short time, you can implement a similar program.

      Unfortunately, this is practically impossible! After the Energia-Buran program was closed, we lost not only technologies, but entire production complexes. Rebuilding or re-profiling other industries is a huge amount of money! And perhaps the most important thing is the time that we do not have. This ship is needed now not in 15-20 years.
      I am writing this because I took a small part in the manufacture of thermal protection for Buran, and now garages are produced in the workshops of our enterprise!
  4. +4
    17 November 2011 20: 07
    “Energy” is a universal system, it can launch a variety of vehicles into different near-earth orbits, as well as launch interplanetary and lunar spacecraft. In this regard, Energia has no analogues in world practice, and its comparison with the well-known American Space Shuttle system is valid only for the case of the launch of the Buran orbiter. Here are some comparative characteristics of both systems - for each characteristic, the data of the Energy - Buran system are given first, and then the data of the Space Shuttle system in brackets:

    The mass of the payload brought to the reference orbit with a height of 200 km is 30 tons with an inclination of the orbit of 50,7 ° (29,5 with an inclination of the orbit of 28 °).

    The mass of the payload returned from orbit to the Earth is 15-20 tons (14,5 tons).

    Starting weight - about 2400 tons (2040 tons).

    The mass of the orbital ship with a maximum payload is 105 tons (114,2 tons).

    The number of crew members is 2-10 people (3-10 people).

    The duration of the functioning of the spacecraft in orbit is 7-30 days (7-30 days).

    The number of first-stage engines is 4 oxygen-kerosene rocket engines (2 solid fuel).

    The number of engines of the second stage is 4 oxygen-hydrogen LRE (3 oxygen-hydrogen LRE).

    The range of the side maneuver of the ship upon its descent to the Earth is up to 2000 km (up to 2040 km).

    The multiplicity of the ship is 100 times (100 times).

    The first stage block rescue scheme is land landing (landing on water). in addition, the snowstorm, unlike the shuttle, could independently take off by plane
    1. snek
      +5
      18 November 2011 08: 29
      It is simply impossible to compare Energia-Buran and Space Shuttle. This is a rare example when two fundamentally different systems are hidden behind the external similarity.
      What we have in the case of the shuttle: the energy center of the system is the shuttle itself, whose engines are powered by a huge tank (such a large, orange in the center). for add. thrust return accelerators to the side. The main idea of ​​the project is that only fuel is wasted, and engines are used many times.
      Now, what we have in the case of Energia-Buran: An excellent heavy rocket (though one-time) with the possibility of its further modernization (project "Volcano"). And to this wonderful rocket Buran is attached (which does not take part in entering orbit in any way). The ship is simply unique for its time, literally an alloy of all the best that science and industry of the USSR of that time can offer. And at the same time it is absolutely useless. What to do with it? carry satellites into orbit? so you can put them on the same Energy and not drag along with them a bunch of tons of dead weight. Return your companions (for example, for repair and subsequent launch) or steal strangers. In the first case, sending Buran for a satellite, its return, repair and subsequent restart make this idea simply prohibitively unprofitable. But stealing has its own problems.

      And the news itself is good - the future of astronautics is with reusable systems.
  5. -2
    17 November 2011 20: 12
    The goals seem to be clear. The tasks are almost set. Is there a desire to fly into space? While there is no obvious one word. Buran-ruined Buran. Now they are destroying space in full. How many unsuccessful launches, and who is to blame? Locksmith? The true culprits are not defined. We are managed by successful managers. Until experts take power into their own hands, complete lawlessness will continue. A change of power is needed. The sooner the better.
    1. +4
      18 November 2011 10: 22
      Whining is not tired yet, doing something useful for the country !!! weak ??
  6. Sergh
    +4
    17 November 2011 20: 28
    Flight tests of the Baikal reusable booster are supposed to be carried out in several stages. At the first stage "Baikal" is installed on the fuselage of a specially equipped carrier aircraft VM-T "Atlant". After takeoff and climb “Baikal” is separated from the carrier and landed in autonomous mode. At the next stage, "Baikal" without the second stage is launched from the launch complex of the "Angara" carrier rocket. And, finally, at the final stage, it is planned to launch Angara A1-B in the standard configuration: the Baikal system plus the second stage Briz-KM.

    As mentioned earlier, the Baikal reusable booster is versatile and can be used on launch vehicles of various classes: American shuttles, French Ariane 5 and a number of other launch vehicles. At the initial stage, it is planned to use "Baikal" in the "Angara" launch vehicle of the light class. "Baikal" will be the first stage in it. However, the market for lightweight carriers is currently not large enough to recoup such an expensive reusable stage. In the early 90s, it was assumed that light rockets would be in great demand due to the projected sharp increase in the number of small spacecraft. However, this did not happen: the number of small spacecraft projects has decreased in recent years. In connection with this circumstance, many launches of light-class missiles were not required, and the large resource that is laid in "Baikal" (200 flights) in the version of a light rocket, most likely, will not be developed by the time of the moral "aging" of the system. Therefore, the creation of a reusable rocket booster will be justified only if it is used in the most popular medium and heavy launch vehicles.

    A promising development of the Angara project is Angara-V of medium and heavy classes. We are talking here about replacing the side universal rocket modules with reusable Baikal boosters. In particular, it is planned to install two boosters (Angara A3-B) on the medium-class carrier Angara A3, and replace four side URMs with four reusable boosters (Angara A5-V) on the heavy-class carrier rocket Angara-A5. ). The option of using accelerators on the "Angara-A4" with an oxygen-hydrogen second stage ("Angara A4-B") is also being considered. But the use of 2-4 reusable boosters on a single launch vehicle causes a number of problems. When assembling the "Angara A5-B" and "Angara A4-B", it was already necessary to make folding horizontal tail fins at two of the four boosters, which, of course, complicates the system.

    The Khrunichev Center and NPO Molniya are developing a version of the project for launching an Angara carrier rocket equipped with a Baikal system from an An-124 Ruslan carrier aircraft. This is a very promising direction, since it allows you to apply the developments created in the framework of the Spiral and Max projects. As part of other promising studies, GKNPTs are working on fully reusable systems, consisting of "Baikal" and a reusable second stage. However, their implementation is a matter of the distant future. According to the staff of the Khrunichev Center, the development of technologies similar to Baikal will inevitably lead to the creation of hypersonic aircraft-carriers of "space" stages. In the future, such aircraft will be equipped with efficient combined engines and converted into full-fledged single-stage aerospace aircraft. They will be fully reusable vehicles for launching crews and cargo into Earth orbit. But for their creation, apparently, more advanced technologies will be required ...









    On the left "Baikal", on the right "Baikal-Angara".
    1. +5
      17 November 2011 22: 01
      In the beginning there was a "Spiral"


      at first we were ahead of the USA. In 1965, everything related to the “winged astronautics” was entrusted to OKB-155 A.I. Mikoyan. The topic of creating an air-orbital aircraft (VOS) received the index "Spiral". Few people know that one of the project managers was cosmonaut No. 2 German. The military leadership did not understand then the prospects for the development of this topic. Then Artem Ivanovich Mikoyan, the mastermind and developer of this topic, as it were, died, and she died with him. Later, when they learned that the Americans were working on the Shuttle system, the leadership was outraged: why do they have and we don’t? Urgently began work on the "Buran". We returned to the Spiral. Used this scheme to work out issues of aerodynamics, thermodynamics. They made four launches into orbit according to the Gagarin single-turn flight scheme. The "spiral" showed very good characteristics. However, in the future, the developers took the path of "cheating" - redrawn the Shuttle diagram and "created" Buran.

      At the Central Aerohydrodynamic Institute (TsAGI), studies of the aerospace complex designed for intercontinental flights at a speed close to the first space one - about 20 thousand km / h. According to the TsAGI press service, the system consists of a subsonic carrier aircraft and an aerospace aircraft (VKS) with a liquid rocket engine. At a range of 16-17 thousand km, the flight time of an aerospace aircraft passes in three stages - active launch into orbit, space flight at near-orbit speed, and planning in the atmosphere. Moreover, this flight does not take more than 50 minutes.

      As a carrier aircraft can be used IL-76MF and IL-96-400T. It is a transport aircraft that must raise the main accelerated module to a great height. After that, the aerospace plane will independently go into orbit, pick up speed up to 20 thousand kilometers per hour, and then plan in the atmosphere for the desired target.
      1. +2
        18 November 2011 09: 36
        and in the figure An-224 Mriya and not Il No.
        1. +1
          18 November 2011 21: 26
          Quote: Dart Weyder
          and in the figure An-224 Mriya and not Il


          I know, but get attention -can used IL-76MF and IL-96-400T
  7. +1
    17 November 2011 22: 12
    Hooray! Good luck in that direction.
  8. Alexey Prikazchikov
    0
    18 November 2011 07: 42
    Uryaaa congratulate all Russians on this event wink , Now it’s clear why the development of Russia was covered up, but these are my thoughts.
  9. +2
    18 November 2011 09: 16
    I think this will be a "worthy and effective response" to the Yusov missile defense system. Here, only, with "not expensive" - ​​perhaps a bobble. The Yankees are preparing for a global strike through space, using hypersound, and the surest way is to have a "watchdog" in orbit.
    1. Alexey Prikazchikov
      0
      18 November 2011 09: 24
      It seems that everybody started to launch garbage into orbit that will accelerate and everything will hurt the fuck than not an option.
      1. +2
        18 November 2011 09: 39
        Yes - by the way, I once heard the theory about launching "pastures with nuts" into orbit - all satellites will be swept away! for the states - it's like Armageddon, the army will go blind, they, for the most part, will not get to the toilet without a navigator! wink
        1. Alexey Prikazchikov
          +1
          18 November 2011 10: 04
          There is one thing, but we can also beat it, but we know about our little meanness, and it is possible to transport satellites a little higher or lower.
          1. snek
            +1
            18 November 2011 10: 15
            There is only one SMALL drawback - the road to space for all mankind will be closed for many generations. And so - a great plan
            1. Alexey Prikazchikov
              0
              18 November 2011 11: 38
              Well, not a fact, not a fact, there are no unsolvable problems.
      2. +1
        18 November 2011 19: 12
        Alexey Prikazchikov, hello! About garbage in space, I have read so much on the ViM from the guys there - sheer waste! wink One even said something like the following: "Yes, if he really squeezes, we launch a carriage with nails (neither yours, nor ours!) Into space, explode and into the Bolshoi on" Three Sisters "by Chekhov! wink This is a variation of "Weider's theory"! lol
  10. 0
    18 November 2011 10: 21
    There were developments on the "Spiral", they scored. There was the Clipper project, and it faded. Now, again, a reusable cargo ... I really want to hope that something will work out ... unfortunately, it is hard to believe ... very similar to a cut ... although in any case, if this is really work on the project, I wish you luck.
  11. Ion coaelung
    0
    18 November 2011 11: 35
    Do you want to build a space elevator? In my opinion, it will be more rational to use for transporting not very large loads back and forth. Of course I jump too far, but it seems you should not ignore such a question! And of course, do not forget about the heavy cargo delivered to orbit.
  12. boos24
    0
    18 November 2011 12: 46
    it’s good that the best practices on the topic of the sea can be taken from each and a decent truck will turn out
    1. Indigo
      0
      18 November 2011 16: 23
      regarding a truck - a question - but is it worth it, a truck "pushing into orbit with a load is extra weight. Launching only the load is much more rational. To remove something from orbit - why, repair and back - there is no point. Only one thing - a repair team for troubleshooting (like Phobos-soil).
      1. Drcoks
        0
        20 November 2011 11: 57
        By the way, and if we had Buran now, he could theoretically remove that Phobos-soil?
        I think "Rus" or something like that should be (it is also partially reusable in my opinion) and a couple of Burans for the repair and withdrawal of large loads. And by the way, and "Parom" was also closed or the project is still alive nobody knows?
  13. dred
    -1
    20 November 2011 09: 31
    The return of the prodigal planes.
  14. belarus
    0
    20 November 2011 23: 52
    snek, the future belongs to Chinese cheap disposable satellites

    Regarding phobos, it would theoretically be nice to have a so-called rem satellite that would approach a damaged satellite and have repair capabilities (manipulators. sets of rem sets. remote repair robots. cameras to monitor the repair process from the ground)
  15. 0
    8 May 2013 02: 15
    Good news.
    Reusable spaceships are also not forgotten.
  16. 0
    10 December 2014 21: 31
    Why is it. Return in 70. By the way, they themselves recognize the unnecessary development.