Destroy at a depth of 20 meters: Russian weapons in Syria

For a long time, Russia fought the “Islamic state” (banned in Russia) on its territory with the help of FSB investigators and operatives, who were actively calculating the Russians who wanted to leave for jihad. But time passed, and the front-line role in the struggle against the followers of the Caliphate took aviationcarrying under its wings hundreds of kilograms of deathly gifts for executioners and slave owners. "Military.RF" figured out what our bombers and attack aircraft take off, flying over the Syrian desert, and whether the jihadist can hide from the pilots of the Su-34.


In the last week, the headlines of various media outlets and the presenters' speeches are almost entirely made up of solid "bombers", "attack aircraft", "air strikes" and so on. Perhaps, even the most distant from the army and geopolitics, Russian citizens know which planes of the Aerospace Force were sent to Syria to bomb the positions of militants of the Islamic State terrorist organization banned in the Russian Federation and what makes Su-24 different from Su-25. And at the same time, little is said about the armament with which our planes are equipped. At the same time, some bombs are the latest developments and are used for the first time in combat conditions.

Destroy at a depth of 20 meters: Russian weapons in Syria

Take off Su-25 with FAB-500

A high-tech novelty, without a doubt, is the bomb KAB-500С adjusted via GLONASS. It falls along a ballistic trajectory, and targeting to a target occurs automatically according to the coordinates specified before the reset. The pilot marks the target with a kind of "black mark" and after dropping the bomb begins to plan for it. The distance that the projectile can deviate from the designated coordinates is five meters. The weight of the bomb is 534 kg with the weight of the warhead 400 kg. Discharge range (except for ammunition with an engine) - 6-8 kilometers. And it is precisely the range of application of this weapons along with the cost of about three million rubles per unit at one time were the main objects of criticism from the Ministry of Defense.



Three years ago, an anonymous officer of the High Command, then the Air Force, told the media that the military had finally decided to abandon the use of the smart bomb. However, in the video above, the Su-34 bomber is equipped with it, although there were no official reports that this bomb was accepted into service by the Russian army.

It turns out that in Syria for the first time it will be used for real, not educational purposes. So the slaughtering militants of the IS and the representatives of the "moderate Syrian opposition" who do not disdain abductions and terrorist acts can help our videoconferencing with new tests in combat by their very existence.

Another adjustable bomb on our aircraft in Syria is the KAB-1500L-F. As the name implies, its mass is about 1500 kilogram. It is worth noting that this representative of the family of bombs like KAB can literally get terrorists out of the ground, penetrating the ground to a depth of 20 meters and exploding there already. And the love of jihadists hiding under the ground makes the bomb an indispensable object under the “belly” of the Russian Su-34.



Bombing can be performed using a television head or laser targeting from the ground. This large-caliber version is designed to hit targets in especially strong fortifications and fortification points. The bomb is able to penetrate through the ceiling thickness of up to three meters. But with a deviation from the target, the 1500-kilogram projectile is worse than the lighter “relatives”. KAB-1500 deviates from the set target at a distance of 10 meters. In most cases, this does not play a special role, given the power of the projectile, but to call it a "precision weapon" with such a level of deviation is only possible with a stretch.


Adjustable aerial bomb KAB-1500

Another Russian weapon used in Syria, capable of reaching terrorists even in their sturdy shelters, is the concrete bomb BETAB-500. It was with this type of missile that the US bombed Iraqi underground bunkers in the hope of getting Saddam Hussein during his last invasion of this country.

BETAB-500 weighs 500 kilograms and is produced in two forms: free fall (BETAB-500U) and with a jet accelerator (BETAB-500ШП). The first version of the bomb breaks through the reinforced concrete meter 1,2, dropped from altitudes from 150 to 20 000 meters at aircraft speed from 500 to 2 300 kilometers per hour. The shell was created for the destruction of underground warehouses and concrete shelters for military equipment. By the way, with the help of its Su-34 bomber, the Russian Aerospace Forces have already destroyed the underground command post of IG militants.



A variant of a bomb equipped with a jet accelerator is designed to destroy runways and roads. When exploded, the ammunition creates a funnel with a diameter of 4-6 meters, and if it hits the asphalt road section, the surface is damaged over an area of ​​up to 50 square meters. At the same time, the armor-piercing rate of the bomb is reduced by more than half compared to the previous version. BETAB-500SP pierces armor up to 55 centimeters thick.

The speed and heights at which it can be dropped are also limited. The bomb is used at aircraft speeds from 700 to 1150 kilometers per hour and altitudes from 170 to 1000 meters. It is easy to see that when finding at such a speed and height the plane becomes especially vulnerable for enemy air defense systems. Moreover, bombers at such a height can suffer even from outdated anti-aircraft artillery systems. The objectives of the use of this bomb and the indicators that the aircraft must reach for its discharge, indicate that BETAB-500ШП is unlikely to be used in this conflict.

Despite the above technological weapons, high-explosive aerial bombs FAB-250 and FAB-500 remain the main "workhorses" of the Russian Aerospace Forces in Syria. This can be judged by the video of the air strikes submitted by the Ministry of Defense and the return of the planes with the Kabb-series not thrown bombs, but with the "fabs" missing under the wings.

High-explosive aerial bombs (FAB) have quite a destructive effect acceptable for a given conflict. They are used for manpower and equipment of the enemy, as well as not fortified communications. It is worth noting that fortifications of the IG are for the most part artisanal, so the need for dropping bombs or penetrating concrete on them is not always the case, it is often possible to dispense with FAB, as during an air strike, the record of which is presented below.

Such aerial bombs in the Russian military warehouses have accumulated a huge amount, and an alternative to dropping them onto jihadist heads is disposal at the test site. Given this, as well as the decent performance of these weapons, it can be said that the widespread use of FAB will continue.

Also on our aircraft in Syria, high-precision air-to-surface X-29L missiles were observed. The letter "L" in the name of the rocket means that it is equipped with a laser homing system. When a rocket is launched, the pilot illuminates the desired target with a laser, while there is no need for further actions to hold the beam on the target, it all happens in automatic mode. The mass of the missile warhead is 500 kilograms.


Rocket X-29 in the museum


X-29L is capable of hitting targets with an accuracy of plus or minus two meters. In addition, it has an increased factor of high-explosive and fragmentation action. According to the Russian Defense Ministry, the missile has already been used against the militants in Syria. According to open sources, the unit cost of such a rocket can reach 7000 dollars (approximately 450 thousand rubles).

A weak, but still deadly, air-to-surface missile X-25ML with a semi-active laser homing head is noted in Syria. The mass of the warhead of this rocket is significantly lower than X-29 and is approximately 90 kilograms.

It is worth noting that the position of the militants of our aviation has to be bombed according to intelligence information provided by the Syrian ground forces. Then this information is further confirmed using Russian UAVs. Because of all this, the work that has to be done even before the Russian bomber or attack aircraft begin to prepare for departure, becomes very time consuming. Such temporary costs practically exclude the probability of destroying a target that is constantly moving through the territory, and our aviation has to be content with the destroyed ammunition depots rather than prominent amirs and commanders of the Islamic State (prohibited in Russia).
Ctrl Enter

Noticed a mistake Highlight text and press. Ctrl + Enter

116 comments
Information
Dear reader, to leave comments on the publication, you must to register.

I have an account? Sign in

  1. Strashila 10 October 2015 06: 58 New
    • 19
    • 0
    +19
    It's the same thing to test weapons in real combat.
    Perhaps we will call the combat zone in Syria the Kura-2 training ground ... and launch from Severodvinsk from the wall of the pier in one gulp the entire ammunition of one of the boats, Sineva with a simple warhead ... that can reach the target much deeper than 20 meters.
    1. Alex_Rarog 10 October 2015 07: 42 New
      • 22
      • 0
      +22
      Not here already the scribe will be! For so far no one has learned to distinguish the equipment of ICBMs in flight.
      1. bulvas 10 October 2015 08: 56 New
        • 9
        • 0
        +9

        If these devils sooner or later reach us from the south, experience will be very useful to us.


        1. sub307 10 October 2015 14: 41 New
          • 8
          • 0
          +8
          “These devils”, to my personal regret, have already come “to us,” but they are fighting there (like 2000 individuals were voiced in the media). So, to "calculate" and "pick out" these ISIS adherents, as they say - it's time "yesterday".
        2. Sterlya 10 October 2015 19: 38 New
          • 1
          • 0
          +1
          Buratin and Solntsepekov are not visible. It is necessary to test on the IG.
          1. Bad_gr 11 October 2015 16: 53 New
            • 2
            • 0
            +2
            Quote: Sterlya
            Buratin and Solntsepekov are not visible. It is necessary to test on the IG.

            “.... Hard times are coming for the militants in Syria. Not only are Russian aircraft operating in their positions, so are the Solntsepek’s heavy flamethrower systems transferred to the front. At least this is evidenced by photographs that appeared on the Internet. On them a trailer with a Volvo tractor throws TOS. The combat vehicle is painted in camouflage characteristic of the Syrian army. .... "
            http://vestnik-rm.ru/news-4-13730.htm
            1. Bad_gr 11 October 2015 17: 07 New
              • 0
              • 0
              0
              With the prices of ammunition, some kind of confusion:
              "... the KAB-500S bomb corrected through GLONASS - 3 000 000 rubles per unit ... "
              "... an air-to-surface missile of the Kh-29L ... Mass of the warhead of the missile is 500 kilograms. - 450 000 rubles.
              That is,
              the Glonas bomb is 6 times more expensive than a laser-guided missile (this is with almost the same warhead)
              ?
              1. Aleksandr81 12 October 2015 03: 30 New
                • 1
                • 0
                +1
                TTX look at both ammunition. The x-29 differs little from the planning air bomb in range, and the accuracy depends on the GOS that is installed.
          2. Cat man null 11 October 2015 17: 08 New
            • 4
            • 0
            +4
            Quote: Sterlya
            Buratin and Solntsepekov are not visible. It is necessary to test on the IG

            Well, here's what you got attached to these flamethrowers?

            The secrecy of their movement is zero, but rather negative. In the presence of at least some kind of aerial reconnaissance - it burns at once.

            The ultimate range is 6 km. With minimal artillery / ATGM is an ideal target.

            Well, Nirazu Pinocchio (and Solntsepek too) is not a child prodigy .. Although the impression, of course, makes. The problem is that too greenhouse conditions are needed for its application, and it does not make sense to apply it for any purpose.

            Because there are few of them in the troops, and they were used in real life only a few times.
            1. Shalalak 11 October 2015 20: 41 New
              • 2
              • 0
              +2
              And what, in fact, does not like 6 km? Even with binoculars you can see his figs at such a distance, especially if you skillfully use the folds of the terrain.
              In Syria, the spaces are slightly different than in Russia. There, by our standards, Asadovites and Opps have been pushing their elbows for a decade on the territory of one decent city. Therefore, a 6-kilometer hand is completely prodigal, if it can wipe everything in its reach from the face.
              1. Cat man null 11 October 2015 23: 19 New
                • 1
                • 0
                +1
                Quote: Shalalak
                A 6-kilometer hand is completely prodigal if it can wipe everything within its reach from the face.

                Sometimes it's better to chew ..
            2. Starley from the south 12 October 2015 20: 22 New
              • 1
              • 0
              +1
              Quote: Cat Man Null
              The secrecy of their movement is zero, but rather negative. In the presence of at least some kind of aerial reconnaissance - it burns at once.

              Therefore, it is advisable to use them when stripping small towns, because no fortifications will save from volumetric detonating incendiary mixture. But aerial reconnaissance ... ISIS terrorists do not have it.
          3. Starley from the south 12 October 2015 20: 18 New
            • 1
            • 0
            +1
            Quote: Sterlya
            Buratin and Solntsepekov are not visible. It is necessary to test on the IG.

            The Iraqi army has pinocchio - our set. So the ISIS did not dare to tempt fate and stay away from it, because you can not hear about the use of Pinocchio.
      2. The comment was deleted.
    2. Talgat 10 October 2015 09: 51 New
      • 8
      • 0
      +8
      Quote: Strashila
      Same thing check weapons in real combat


      I agree - testing new weapons in real combat (but of course these are all the second and third goals - the first is still geopolitical - to protect Syria and Iran)

      And of course the disposal of accumulated old bombs

      Americans did the same when they bombed Libya Iraq Yugoslavia Afghanistan
    3. Sweles 10 October 2015 10: 30 New
      • 4
      • 0
      +4
      The bomb is capable of penetrating through ceilings up to three meters thick. But with a deviation from the target, the 1500-pound shell is already worse than the lighter "relatives". KAB-1500 deviates from a given target by a distance of 10 meters. In most cases, this does not play a special role, given the power of the projectile, but to call it a "high-precision weapon" at this level of deviation can only be a stretch.


      I wonder why this is so? that heavy ammunition is worse managed? it’s unlikely that something was underworked here.
      1. The comment was deleted.
      2. Sweles 10 October 2015 10: 46 New
        • 1
        • 0
        +1
        although other sources have other data on the accuracy of guidance 4-7m

        http://www.ktrv.ru/production/68/685/799/
      3. WUA 518 10 October 2015 14: 02 New
        • 4
        • 0
        +4
        Quote: Sveles
        I wonder why this is so?

        Laser-guided KAB is guided by a reflected beam. Illumination is carried out from a carrier aircraft, another aircraft or from the ground. The hit depends on the accuracy of the illumination of the target, it also depends on the presence of a haze of fog, which reduces the accuracy of the hit. CAB with television guidance, implemented the principle of dropped and forgotten. But here, not everything is so smooth. The accuracy of the hit is affected by the slightest change in the contrast of the target, a change in lighting, a shadow from the clouds, again the presence of haze, fog, dust.
    4. The comment was deleted.
    5. marlin1203 10 October 2015 21: 09 New
      • 0
      • 0
      0
      The price tag for bombs is not frail! laughing Maybe Obama ask for a loan for this good deed ... irrevocable .. yes
      1. Varyag_1973 12 October 2015 10: 05 New
        • 1
        • 0
        +1
        Why irrevocable ?! We can return in kind, in the sense of bombs, with delivery to the final consumer!
    6. DenZ 12 October 2015 09: 26 New
      • 1
      • 0
      +1
      О Each launching ballistic missiles we warn our potential friends. And it’s expensive to shoot Sineva according to ISIS. Very expensive.
    7. DenZ 12 October 2015 09: 26 New
      • 0
      • 0
      0
      О Each launching ballistic missiles we warn our potential friends. And it’s expensive to shoot Sineva according to ISIS. Very expensive.
  2. Kos_kalinki9 10 October 2015 07: 18 New
    • 16
    • 0
    +16
    our aviation still has to be content with destroyed warehouses with ammunition, and not prominent amirs and commanders of the "Islamic State" (prohibited
    in Russia).

    And a lot of these prominent emirs and commanders without ammunition will fight. With a saber pinned against the tank. Kill the mat. part. Mandatory.
    1. Alekseev 10 October 2015 08: 55 New
      • 10
      • 0
      +10
      Quote: Kos_kalinki9
      And a lot of these prominent emirs and commanders without ammunition will fight.

      Amirov and commanders there "more than to hell." Destroy them, of course, necessary. To make others afraid. And not only by aviation, they are not always jumping through the desert.
      But the main thing is to undermine the material foundation of ISIS and the bearded hamadrils that joined it.
      In addition, the successful "heavenly punishment" causes an irresistible desire to quit fighting and sit at the negotiation table with the so-called moderates.
      1. Kos_kalinki9 10 October 2015 09: 58 New
        • 2
        • 0
        +2
        [quote = alekseev] [/ quote]
        Amirov and commanders there "more than to hell." [/ quote]
        Yes, consider in every village or village, I do not know what they have called there.
    2. ostrom 10 October 2015 10: 02 New
      • 2
      • 0
      +2
      Well, aviation will still not be able to hit every action movie, but Pinocchio and Solntsepeki would help in this case.
      1. Kos_kalinki9 10 October 2015 10: 21 New
        • 3
        • 0
        +3
        Of course he can’t. But if you can deprive the bases and warehouses with weapons and ammunition. And how many of these "emirs" will fight without support bases? It was then that Cheburashki (hello Geletei-Ilovaisky, or who blurted it out, I do not remember exactly) Assad’s armies would be very useful.
        1. thinker 10 October 2015 13: 46 New
          • 3
          • 0
          +3
          According to your wishes, have already arrived -
          Journalists from the SAR published photographs taken in Syria, which recorded the heavy Solntsek flamethrower system, which was transported by truck. The number of flamethrower systems located in Syria is still unknown.
        2. dyksi
          dyksi 10 October 2015 15: 01 New
          • 5
          • 0
          +5
          I agree that this is exactly what our aviation is doing there now, they need to be “immobilized” if they can put it this way, deprived of fuel, command centers, weapons and ammunition depots, fuel and lubricant depots, military equipment, centralized command and the fruits are already there. Several settlements were taken, many heights, communications around Idlib were also captured, the army began to advance along the Turkish border. Our aviation works super, those turntables generally don’t touch the roofs of houses.
          1. mongolos 12 October 2015 18: 21 New
            • 1
            • 0
            +1
            Super Assy Flyers !!!! admiration for courage and skill ... good luck to the guys and good !!!!!
      2. Cat man null 10 October 2015 16: 33 New
        • -2
        • 0
        -2
        Quote: ostrom
        beat every action movie

        Quote: ostrom
        Pinocchio and Sunshine would help

        Do you understand what you said? laughing

        That got it already. Dos ta lo.

        - people heard the word "Pinocchio." What is it, why is it - people have no idea ..
        - and now he begins this word everywhere where it is necessary and not necessary.

        Pinocchio - for those who are on an armored car - can be used:

        - in conditions when the enemy is not able to provide fire resistance
        - in conditions when the enemy has no intelligence. From the word "not at all"
        - the maximum range for Pinocchio - 6 km

        Such is the "prodigy"
      3. Ze Kot 10 October 2015 19: 35 New
        • 1
        • 0
        +1
        Quote: ostrom
        Well, aviation will still not be able to hit every action movie, but Pinocchio and Solntsepeki would help in this case.



        And what is the range of "Pinocchio and Solntsepeka"? And who will manage them? This is a direct land clash, which the Russian command is trying to avoid.
      4. Starley from the south 12 October 2015 20: 28 New
        • 1
        • 0
        +1
        Quote: ostrom
        Well, aviation will still not be able to hit every action movie, but Pinocchio and Solntsepeki would help in this case.

        Why did everyone come up against Pinocchio and Solntsepeka? After all, we have a slightly less powerful, but more long-range weapon - Hurricane and Tornado are called. I don’t know just whether they are being delivered to Syria or just planning.
  3. Reptiloid 10 October 2015 07: 18 New
    • 0
    • 0
    0
    LET from fear of our weapons All kinds of bandits and terrorists are Middle Eastern, European, North American. KNOWLEDGE about our weapons will fix the retarded.
  4. Professor 10 October 2015 07: 21 New
    • 17
    • 0
    +17
    KAB-1500 deviates from a given target by a distance of 10 meters. In most cases, this does not play a special role, given the power of the projectile, but to call it a "high-precision weapon" at this level of deviation can only be a stretch.

    No stretch. This is a precision weapon.

    High-explosive bombs (FAB) have a damaging effect that is quite acceptable for a given conflict. They are used in manpower and enemy technology, as well as in non-fortified communications.

    I do not agree with the author. Fighting takes place among civilians and stupid bombs do more damage to attackers than to attacked. Moreover, the caliber of 250 kg is excessive in such operations. Need 100 kilograms maximum.

    X-29L is capable of hitting targets with an accuracy of plus or minus two meters.

    Not certainly in that way. This KVO is 1-2 meters from the aiming point, or rather the backlight point. That is, 50% of the ammunition will fall at such a distance from the aiming point. Now imagine the plane at high speed and altitude provides this backlight. The spot will jump around the target and the real accuracy will be far from 1-2 meters. In such cases, an external observer from the ground is preferred by an advanced gunner. As far as I know, Assad does not have such.
    1. Kos_kalinki9 10 October 2015 07: 50 New
      • 7
      • 0
      +7
      Professor, good morning, and you can’t get sick.
      Quote: Professor
      . As far as I know, Assad does not have such.
      Do you have an informant there ???????
    2. Gregazov 10 October 2015 09: 41 New
      • 8
      • 0
      +8
      Quote: Professor

      X-29L is capable of hitting targets with an accuracy of plus or minus two meters.

      Not certainly in that way. This KVO is 1-2 meters from the aiming point, or rather the backlight point. That is, 50% of the ammunition will fall at such a distance from the aiming point. Now imagine the plane at high speed and altitude provides this backlight. The spot will jump around the target and the real accuracy will be far from 1-2 meters. In such cases, an external observer from the ground is preferred by an advanced gunner. As far as I know, Assad does not have such.

      But there are UAVs hanging over the target and capable of highlighting it.
      1. Professor 10 October 2015 09: 52 New
        • -6
        • 0
        -6
        Quote: GregAzov
        But there are UAVs hanging over the target and capable of highlighting it.

        Who has such drones?
        1. Kos_kalinki9 10 October 2015 11: 02 New
          • 0
          • 0
          0
          Quote: Professor
          Quote: GregAzov
          But there are UAVs hanging over the target and capable of highlighting it.

          Who has such drones?

          Moscow, October 1. A short video of the bombing of the Islamic State’s positions, published by the Russian Ministry of Defense, provides specialists with a lot of valuable information. So, for example, for the first time in the history of modern wars, Russia fully began to use drones.

          “The fact that there is video tracking suggests that the shooting was carried out from drones. It is very important. For a long time, the Russian army did not use unmanned aircraft on a real scale. As for the theater of operations, it is typical of Syria: no mountains, desert. The attacks were carried out in the suburbs and areas of the road, so that later the Syrian army, which operates on the ground in conjunction with our aircraft, would already launch an attack on these areas. It is clear that strikes are inflicted on the infrastructure of the militants, first of all, ”said Ivan Konovalov, director of the Center for Strategic Market Studies, on the LifeNews television channel.
          1. Professor 10 October 2015 12: 01 New
            • 2
            • 0
            +2
            Quote: Kos_kalinki9
            typical for Syria: no mountains, desert.

            Who is bad with geography? fool
        2. Scraptor 10 October 2015 14: 53 New
          • 1
          • 0
          +1
          Of course, only Israel is over lol

          power can reduce power
          but about the stabilization system have you heard something?
    3. Vadim237 10 October 2015 11: 23 New
      • 2
      • 0
      +2
      Rather, it needs small guided missiles with a warhead of 10 kilograms and a smart fuse like the RMG, a similar missile in the USA was made for drones, only it has a warhead of only 3 kilograms.
    4. EvgNik 10 October 2015 12: 23 New
      • 1
      • 0
      +1
      Quote: Professor
      No stretch. This is a precision weapon.

      This for the states can be highly accurate: a kilometer there, two here - highly accurate. We, apparently, are called high-precision that strikes sniper. And this, in general, is correct.
      1. Professor 10 October 2015 12: 31 New
        • 0
        • 0
        0
        Quote: EvgNik
        This for the states can be highly accurate: a kilometer there, two here - highly accurate. We, apparently, are called high-precision that strikes sniper. And this, in general, is correct.

        Among the bourgeois, the modern high-precision weapon KVO is already being described, since there accuracy is an absolute pinpoint. You don't have such a weapon yet. So do not even start doing phalometry. It will not be in your favor.

        And the accuracy of 10 m for such a bomb is considered high-precision, sniper.
        1. Scraptor 10 October 2015 14: 55 New
          • 4
          • 0
          +4
          absolute precision does not happen - "everything is relative" tongue

          let's be measured again already laughing
          1. Professor 10 October 2015 17: 38 New
            • -4
            • 0
            -4
            Quote: Scraptor
            absolute precision does not happen - "everything is relative"

            It happens. It is called pinpoint.

            Quote: Terner38
            10 days of operation - oil + $ 5 = 10%. Accordingly, oil industry revenues, taxes + defense industry work and hard workers income. The layout is very positive across the country.

            The price of oil has nothing to do with the latest developments in Syria, but only with stocks in the United States.

            Quote: Scraptor
            USSR ammunition has flown into the ventilation shafts of bunkers and even into the embrasure of bunkers since the beginning of the 70s, the price of the issue is 100 thousand rubles new. On the contrary, the United States reached such a level only in 2007 ...

            For example?
            1. Scraptor 10 October 2015 17: 54 New
              • 1
              • 0
              +1
              absolute accuracy, this is the "0" th accuracy, that is, nowhere.
              Professor, "compile" is better ... especially in accordance with the postulates of your prototype.

              what, for example?
              1. Professor 10 October 2015 17: 58 New
                • -10
                • 0
                -10
                Quote: Scraptor
                Professor, "compile" is better ... especially in accordance with the postulates of your prototype.

                If I compile then you are looking for the answer in Google. Before ... I will not throw beads.
                1. Scraptor 10 October 2015 18: 03 New
                  • 2
                  • 0
                  +2
                  Beads are thrown in front of you here, and Google is collecting questions ... bully
                2. Scraptor 10 October 2015 20: 20 New
                  • 1
                  • 0
                  +1
                  What about the beads where did you read? Failed to fuse - have you already been baptized?
            2. Sterlya 10 October 2015 21: 34 New
              • 1
              • 0
              +1
              Quote: Professor
              The price of oil has nothing to do with the latest developments in Syria, but only with stocks in the United States.

              Are you sure?
            3. Starley from the south 12 October 2015 20: 36 New
              • 1
              • 0
              +1
              Quote: Professor
              It happens. It is called pinpoint.

              Professor, did you study physics at the institute?
              1. Scraptor 12 October 2015 20: 42 New
                • -1
                • 0
                -1
                only the theory of relativity - it’s already written about this somewhere lol

                Quote: Scraptor
                to the professor love

                laughing
        2. dyksi
          dyksi 10 October 2015 15: 13 New
          • 2
          • 0
          +2
          Here you are right professor, in high-precision weapons, we are lagging behind, for some reason this direction was considered by us as secondary. GBU, we wouldn’t be disturbed there right now, things are very effective.
          1. Scraptor 10 October 2015 16: 28 New
            • 1
            • 0
            +1
            Who are you? The WTO came from the USSR, with the invention of a laser and a high-pressure seeker in it. Everything has already been done for a long time ...
        3. Starley from the south 12 October 2015 20: 34 New
          • 1
          • 0
          +1
          Quote: Professor
          Among the bourgeois, the modern high-precision weapon KVO is already being described, since there accuracy is an absolute pinpoint.

          Is it such a bomb (or rocket) with a television camera that is guided by a pilot in an airplane in real time and can fly into the window?
          1. Professor 13 October 2015 07: 34 New
            • 1
            • 0
            +1
            Quote: Starley from the South
            Is it such a bomb (or rocket) with a television camera that is guided by a pilot in an airplane in real time and can fly into the window?

            And that too.

            Professor, did you study physics at the institute?

            Yes.
    5. Boa kaa 10 October 2015 20: 05 New
      • 3
      • 0
      +3
      Quote: Professor
      In such cases, an external observer from the ground is preferred by an advanced gunner. As far as I know, Assad does not have such.
      Oleg, and what, your sworn * friends * - Iranians of such B. Assad cannot borrow for a certain fee? Or did the SAR-Iran military coalition take shape only at the level of the Information Center, but there is no one in the troops?
      1. Professor 10 October 2015 20: 15 New
        • -3
        • 0
        -3
        Quote: BoA KAA
        Oleg, and what, your sworn * friends * - Iranians of such B. Asad cannot borrow for a certain fee

        It’s hard to borrow what you don’t have.
        1. Scraptor 10 October 2015 20: 23 New
          • 2
          • 0
          +2
          Strange, Iran, unlike Arabs, even makes planes itself ... Or they could buy Chinese.
    6. srelock 12 October 2015 02: 13 New
      • 1
      • 0
      +1
      Quote: Professor
      I do not agree with the author. Fighting takes place among civilians and stupid bombs do more damage to attackers than to attacked. Moreover, the caliber of 250 kg is excessive in such operations. Need 100 kilograms maximum.
      I think that the type of ammunition is more dependent on the specific situation.
      In such cases, an external observer from the ground is preferred by an advanced gunner. As far as I know, Assad does not have such.

      What if there is ...
      1. mongolos 12 October 2015 20: 15 New
        • -2
        • 0
        -2
        ...Russian speech!!! art spotters get ours ?? although for so many years of fighting, the sirs had to "get their hands on" .....
    7. Black Colonel 12 October 2015 18: 12 New
      • 0
      • 0
      0
      Is backlighting from a drone possible?
      1. Professor 13 October 2015 07: 33 New
        • 1
        • 0
        +1
        Quote: Black Colonel
        Is backlighting from a drone possible?

        Theoretically possible. Practically embodied among the bourgeois.
        1. Scraptor 13 October 2015 07: 41 New
          • 0
          • 0
          0
          Professor, are satellites usually drones? With them (radar intelligence), this has already been done for a long time.
          1. Professor 13 October 2015 07: 47 New
            • 1
            • 0
            +1
            Quote: Scraptor
            Professor, are satellites usually drones? With them (radar intelligence), this has already been done for a long time.

            Are the satellites here? Highlighting targets on earth, they still do not carry out.
            1. Scraptor 13 October 2015 07: 53 New
              • 0
              • 0
              0
              Despite the fact that they are usually driftless. Radar intelligence or optoelectronic - carry out.
              1. Professor 13 October 2015 07: 59 New
                • 1
                • 0
                +1
                Quote: Scraptor
                Despite the fact that they are usually driftless. Radar intelligence or optoelectronic - carry out.

                Is the satellite a UAV? Does it illuminate the target? Oh well... wassat
                1. Scraptor 13 October 2015 08: 19 New
                  • 0
                  • 0
                  0
                  Manned rarely happen ... And what are the principal objections? Don't radars make it happen?
                  1. Professor 13 October 2015 08: 27 New
                    • 1
                    • 0
                    +1
                    Quote: Scraptor
                    Manned rarely happen ... And what are the principal objections? Don't radars make it happen?

                    Stop turning on the fool. fool
                    1. The satellite is not a drone.
                    2. Illumination of targets from satellites is not carried out.
                    1. Scraptor 13 October 2015 11: 43 New
                      • 0
                      • 0
                      0
                      It doesn’t turn off for you:
                      Changing their orbit (and not just their orientation), or Buran or X-37 is also not a drone?
                      Passive radar seeker is what? And what is the radar? How does it work - without highlighting?
                      1. Professor 13 October 2015 11: 58 New
                        • 1
                        • 0
                        +1
                        This is my last comment to you. I will not waste time on such ...

                        Quote: Scraptor
                        Changing their orbit (and not just their orientation), or Buran or X-37 is also not a drone?

                        No, not a drone. Teach materiel.

                        Quote: Scraptor
                        Passive radar seeker is what? And what is the radar? How does it work - without highlighting?

                        Satellites do not illuminate ground targets. At least for the time being.
                      2. Scraptor 13 October 2015 12: 06 New
                        • 0
                        • 0
                        0
                        The crow has sworn ... (google will prompt further) laughing

                        And the Intersеate TDR-1 is also not a drone? (there is no such picture). D-21 - drone. Why is the X-37 or Buran not a drone? Or at least a satellite changing its orbit, if not just an orientation in space, and not a course?
                        When studying the materiel, at least occasionally you need to turn on the head and not constantly show people in decent condition ...

                        So you still do not know how the radar works and that there are such semi-active radar radar seekers.
  • Hubun 10 October 2015 07: 21 New
    • 7
    • 0
    +7
    Wherever you put everywhere the benefits, and experience, and testing, and disposal. Yes, and this scum to thin out one of the main tasks.
    1. mongolos 12 October 2015 20: 16 New
      • 0
      • 0
      0
      ... with recycling !!!! the bull's eye ))))))
  • Nehist 10 October 2015 07: 35 New
    • -10
    • 0
    -10
    The author at the beginning of the article wrote such nonsense !!! In general, the worse the worse, adequate people miss. Either patriots cheers or everything is gone !!! Apparently the mind atrophied, the bulk!
    1. Lord of Wrath 10 October 2015 08: 37 New
      • -14
      • 0
      -14
      Judging by the reports of the Ministry of Defense on the number of targets destroyed, the militants will soon end) According to the 1 reports, the strike = 200 to the militants
  • SeregaBoss 10 October 2015 07: 38 New
    • -20
    • 0
    -20
    Wow KAB500С costs about 3 lyamov? Richly and effectively, we save Assad.
    1. Kos_kalinki9 10 October 2015 08: 26 New
      • 4
      • 0
      +4
      Quote: Serge Boss
      The Ministry of Defense has video of air strikes and the return of aircraft with unbroken bombs of the KAB series, but with “fabs” missing under the wings.

      video of airstrikes and the return of aircraft with non-dropped bombs of the KAB series, but with “fabs” missing under the wings.

      Our pilots protect KABA. Money in vain in the desert is not thrown into the wind.
    2. Petrovich1952 10 October 2015 08: 39 New
      • -3
      • 0
      -3
      Wow KAB500C costs about 3 lyam? We save and save Assad richly and efficiently. After we’ll provide the bill, did you think you could launch rockets and bombs for free?
      1. avia1991 10 October 2015 09: 23 New
        • 5
        • 0
        +5
        Quote: Petrovich1952
        and you thought we let loose bombs and bombs?

        I think no one thinks about this in this vein.
        Confusion about inconsistencies in the author’s presentation: the KAB-500 costs 3 lyamas, and the X-29, with a large warhead mass and greater accuracy,
        the unit cost of such a rocket can reach $ 7000 (approximately 450 thousand rubles).
        Is this an "unverified source" about the QAB, or different manufacturers "break" so different prices ???
    3. GRAY 10 October 2015 09: 01 New
      • 35
      • 0
      +35
      Quote: Serge Boss
      Wow KAB500С costs about 3 lyamov? Richly and effectively, we save Assad.

      I really like the position of our beloved liberals:
      They are bombed by the FABs - an obsolete ineffective weapon and a sign of Russia's lag in the field of high technology.
      They bomb them with CABs - a waste of huge money, it is better to spend them on pensions / medicine / education / to distribute to orphans (underline as necessary).
      Where not to throw - everything is not a horse feed. smile
      1. Vladimirets 10 October 2015 09: 36 New
        • 37
        • 0
        +37
        Quote: GRAY
        Where not to throw - everything is not a horse feed.

        Maybe it is better to dump liberals on ISIS? Cheap and effective. smile
        1. GRAY 10 October 2015 10: 11 New
          • 7
          • 0
          +7
          Quote: Vladimirets
          Maybe it is better to dump liberals on ISIS? Cheap and effective.

          Here's another thing, spend fuel on them, they’re self-propelled - they will reach smile
          There is, however, a problem - they are directed only at democratic values.
          The shelling of Tseyevropa by homing liberals has been ongoing for a long time, skakly this case was cut and counteracted.
          Open in new tab:
          1. skifd 10 October 2015 13: 13 New
            • 2
            • 0
            +2
            Quote: GRAY
            skakly this business cut through


            Decently "thanked". Traitors who need it. Or those who forever overwhelm in w (below the spine) oppe.
            1. Michael_59 10 October 2015 18: 24 New
              • 2
              • 0
              +2
              Quote: skifd
              Traitors who need it.


              Well this turns out - even traitors are not needed traitors?
              1. skifd 10 October 2015 18: 37 New
                • 0
                • 0
                0
                Quote: Michael_59
                Well this turns out - even traitors are not needed traitors?


                It turns out something like this ... When I wrote, he was about the same "complicated" wassat request .
        2. Yuyuka 10 October 2015 12: 06 New
          • 6
          • 0
          +6
          Quote: Vladimirets
          Maybe it is better to dump liberals on ISIS? Cheap and effective.

          in no case! there’s a complete stench from them, and when a large pile of “illiquid” falls on top of the “moderate”, they will also accuse us of using chemical weapons belay
        3. realdiamond 10 October 2015 12: 44 New
          • 3
          • 0
          +3
          They them them .. kiss to death. And they are pleased and we are well.
        4. Rader 10 October 2015 21: 36 New
          • 1
          • 0
          +1
          Quote: Vladimirets
          Quote: GRAY
          Where not to throw - everything is not a horse feed.

          Maybe it is better to dump liberals on ISIS? Cheap and effective. smile

          This is not humane towards ISIS wassat
      2. Kos_kalinki9 10 October 2015 09: 52 New
        • 1
        • 0
        +1
        Quote: GRAY
        Quote: Serge Boss
        Wow KAB500С costs about 3 lyamov? Richly and effectively, we save Assad.


        Where not to throw - everything is not a horse feed. smile

        Yeah, it’s better to pay tribute to the bearded then, but liberally hi
      3. Corsair 10 October 2015 17: 54 New
        • 1
        • 0
        +1
        Quote: GRAY
        I really like the position of our beloved liberals:
        They are bombed by the FABs - an obsolete ineffective weapon and a sign of Russia's lag in the field of high technology.
        They bomb them with CABs - a waste of huge money, it is better to spend them on pensions / medicine / education / to distribute to orphans (underline as necessary).
        Where not to throw - everything is not a horse feed.

        laughing I just read one more argument yesterday from this - they say in 2015 only 1 tram was built.
    4. Terner38 10 October 2015 12: 49 New
      • 8
      • 0
      +8
      10 days of operation - oil + $ 5 = 10%. Accordingly, oil industry revenues, taxes + defense industry work and hard workers income. The layout is very positive across the country.
    5. Andrey Skokovsky 10 October 2015 18: 45 New
      • 3
      • 0
      +3
      Quote: Serge Boss
      Wow KAB500С costs about 3 lyamov? Richly and effectively, we save Assad.

      do not give a reference why today TODAY such a price for cab500s?
      it’s just by god that this liberal gundezhik is already fed up

      the amount of 3 million rubles was announced in the 2003 year !!! when it was developed, today the price is a state secret

      I hope you are familiar with such concepts as cost reduction in mass production and design optimization for cheaper products?
  • The comment was deleted.
  • Tujh 10 October 2015 07: 48 New
    • 9
    • 0
    +9
    Quote: Professor
    High-explosive bombs (FAB) have a damaging effect that is quite acceptable for a given conflict. They are used in manpower and enemy technology, as well as in non-fortified communications.

    I do not agree with the author. Fighting takes place among civilians and stupid bombs do more damage to attackers than to attacked. Moreover, the caliber of 250 kg is excessive in such operations. Need 100 kilograms maximum.

    Somehow I’m not very sure of the presence of civilians in the headquarters and training camps of terrorists, unless of course they are hostages. Secondly, bombs of this caliber are not weapons of direct support to the ground forces - what kind of casualties are the attackers talking about?
    1. Professor 10 October 2015 07: 54 New
      • -3
      • 0
      -3
      Quote: Tujh
      Somehow I’m not very sure of the presence of civilians in the headquarters and training camps of terrorists, unless of course they are hostages.

      They and their children are deeply mixed in the civilian population. Their infrastructure is in mosques, schools and hospitals. Training camps (how loud it sounds) is a primitive obstacle course with a shooting range next to villages in which, in addition to children, the local population lives.

      Quote: Tujh
      Secondly, bombs of this caliber are not weapons of direct support to the ground forces - what kind of casualties are the attackers talking about?

      Hmm ... And yours write, "Assad troops went on the offensive with the direct support of the Russian Air Force." What do they support? Nurses seen on crocodiles. And also?
      1. GRAY 10 October 2015 08: 17 New
        • 3
        • 0
        +3
        Quote: Professor
        And yet?

        Su-25 yet, with a full set.
        1. Professor 10 October 2015 09: 34 New
          • -5
          • 0
          -5
          Quote: GRAY
          Su-25 yet, with a full set.

          Judging by the reports from Latakia there does not smell like a full set. Suppose he is. What are its high-precision components?

          Quote: avia1991
          And what is not enough? Su-25 bombs of small caliber roll in handfuls

          On the contrary. Too much and not too accurate. need smaller and more precise.

          Quote: Tujh
          If this is a school, are you sure that classes are still being held there with schoolchildren? If this is a hospital, what do you think - do they conduct operations and a course of treatment for civilians there?

          That’s what they do, they hide behind the civilian population.
          1. GRAY 10 October 2015 10: 26 New
            • 11
            • 0
            +11
            Quote: Professor
            Judging by the reports from Latakia there does not smell like a full set. Suppose he is. What are its high-precision components?

            But why are they needed for direct support of the troops?
            FABami spattered on the area and the end.
            About the civilian population, I just do not need to rinse my brain, it is not on the line of contact.
          2. Kos_kalinki9 10 October 2015 10: 42 New
            • 0
            • 0
            0
            Quote: Professor
            they are children
            1. Kos_kalinki9 10 October 2015 10: 45 New
              • 2
              • 0
              +2
              Is it also children?
          3. aiden 10 October 2015 20: 07 New
            • 1
            • 0
            +1
            Quote: Professor
            On the contrary. Too much and not too accurate. need smaller and more precise.

            Do not be afraid, they will not fall into the territory of Israel
      2. avia1991 10 October 2015 09: 27 New
        • 2
        • 0
        +2
        Quote: Professor
        Nurses seen on crocodiles. And also?

        And what is not enough? Su-25 bombs of small caliber roll in handfuls wassat
      3. Kos_kalinki9 10 October 2015 10: 15 New
        • 2
        • 0
        +2
        Professor, excuse me, you are like a hackneyed gramophone: they are children, they are children. Take something else out of the depths.
      4. SIvan 10 October 2015 10: 50 New
        • 1
        • 0
        +1
        Quote: Professor
        Hmm ... And yours write, "Assad troops went on the offensive with the direct support of the Russian Air Force." What do they support? Nurses seen on crocodiles. And also?


        In reports on the same Crocodiles, in addition to NURSs, there were ATGMs.
    2. aiden 10 October 2015 20: 05 New
      • 0
      • 0
      0
      And there the Israeli civilian population
  • valokordin 10 October 2015 07: 49 New
    • 8
    • 0
    +8
    Quote: Nehist
    The author at the beginning of the article wrote such nonsense !!! In general, the worse the worse, adequate people miss. Either patriots cheers or everything is gone !!! Apparently the mind atrophied, the bulk!

    Dear Colonel, have you woken up yet? How many errors in the text and WRONG is written as rubbish. Cha, schu write through a, chu, schu write through y.
  • Tujh 10 October 2015 08: 17 New
    • 8
    • 0
    +8
    Quote: Professor
    They and their children are deeply mixed in the civilian population. Their infrastructure is in mosques, schools and hospitals. Training camps (how loud it sounds) is a primitive obstacle course with a shooting range next to villages in which, in addition to children, the local population lives.

    If this is a school, are you sure that classes are still being held there with schoolchildren? If this is a hospital, what do you think - do they conduct operations and a course of treatment for civilians there? Moreover, why besides aerial intelligence use ground intelligence and intelligence? To extinguish everyone, like the Americans, calling it "collateral losses"? Then it would be easier to smash all MLRS and not to bathe.
    Quote: Professor
    Hmm ... And yours write, "Assad troops went on the offensive with the direct support of the Russian Air Force." What do they support? Nurses seen on crocodiles. And also?

    And how would you feel when land units attacked from the front with the support of “crocodiles” with NURSs, and reinforcements coming to the aid of the same FABs mix in the rear?
  • mamont5 10 October 2015 08: 28 New
    • 4
    • 0
    +4
    Quote: Serge Boss
    Wow KAB500С costs about 3 lyamov? Richly and effectively, we save Assad.

    A weapon is an expensive thing. Moreover, modern weapons. It is only batons cheap.
  • Alexy 10 October 2015 08: 34 New
    • 2
    • 0
    +2
    Weapons still need to be tested. Ideal in combat.
  • vell.65 10 October 2015 08: 59 New
    • 2
    • 0
    +2
    Quote: Kos_kalinki9
    our aviation still has to be content with destroyed ammunition depots,

    Why did the Americans and the howl raised that it’s not where the air strikes of our aircraft are aimed.
    1. Kos_kalinki9 10 October 2015 11: 07 New
      • 2
      • 0
      +2
      Quote: vell.65
      Quote: Kos_kalinki9
      our aviation still has to be content with destroyed ammunition depots,

      Why did the Americans and the howl raised that it’s not where the air strikes of our aircraft are aimed.

      So you will raise a howl if your CHILD, so to speak, from a mother’s hand is fed up with a hollow. They are moderate (this is about the opposition in Syria)
  • The comment was deleted.
  • MATROSKIN-53 10 October 2015 10: 07 New
    • 3
    • 0
    +3
    Of course, it is better for the flyers to speak out on this issue. They are docks in this business. But what is written is also impressive.
  • bashmak 10 October 2015 10: 09 New
    • 3
    • 0
    +3
    Quote: Professor
    I do not agree with the author. The fighting takes place among civilians

    The fighting takes place during the WAR! Russia is at war with this riffraff! And in the war zone the presence of civilians is a problem for the civilians themselves. Evacuate, switch sides, partisan! Remember the story!
    1. Professor 10 October 2015 11: 51 New
      • -8
      • 0
      -8
      Quote: bashmak
      The fighting takes place during the WAR! Russia is at war with this riffraff! And in the war zone the presence of civilians is a problem for the civilians themselves. Evacuate, switch sides, partisan! Remember the story!

      Is Russia at war? request So, this shusher, as you put it, has the weight of the right to attack the civilian population of Russia on the territory of Russia itself, following your own formula "Evacuate, switch sides, partisan"?

      Quote: GRAY
      But why are they needed for direct support of the troops?

      At least not to fuck your own. I have an article about this.

      Quote: GRAY
      FABami spattered on the area and the end.

      There are armies and front lines. Fighting is conducted mainly in urban areas. What area? Lenin Square? wink And yours? What about civilians?

      Quote: GRAY
      About the civilian population, I just do not need to rinse my brain, it is not on the line of contact.

      There is always. It went hundreds of times. I can tell heartbreaking stories and video show:


      Quote: SIvan
      In reports on the same Crocodiles, in addition to NURSs, there were ATGMs.

      Show please.

      Quote: Kos_kalinki9
      Professor, excuse me, you are like a hackneyed gramophone: they are children, they are children. Take something else out of the depths.

      That’s exactly what your terrorists are called dividing them into actually “terrorists” (Ishil) and “onihedeti” (Hamas and Hezbollah).
      1. Scraptor 10 October 2015 15: 00 New
        • 0
        • 0
        0
        it means - military facilities, but not "de-houseing" with residents
  • Sergey-8848 10 October 2015 11: 47 New
    • 1
    • 0
    +1
    The mantra that an organization like ISIS "banned in the Russian Federation", it would be possible not to cite as much as twice. Not a single report or message on TV, radio, or in newspapers is complete without this spell. Everyone already knows about this.
  • bashmak 10 October 2015 12: 09 New
    • 2
    • 0
    +2
    Quote: Professor
    So, this shusher, as you put it, has the weight of the right to attack the civilian population of Russia on the territory of Russia itself, following your own formula "Evacuate, switch sides, partisan"?

    From their point of view, it has! The war is the opposition of ideologies with the help of weapons. If our country carries out military operations in Syria, then it, that is, we must be ready for retaliatory action.
    1. Professor 10 October 2015 12: 14 New
      • -3
      • 0
      -3
      Quote: bashmak
      From their point of view, it has!

      With yours, dear, with yours?
      1. bashmak 10 October 2015 12: 52 New
        • 3
        • 0
        +3
        My point of view, GUYS, LET'S LIVE FRIENDLY !!! But seriously, how many lives and fates take these games of politicians. WHERE DOES THE WORLD GO?
        1. skifd 10 October 2015 13: 21 New
          • 4
          • 0
          +4
          Lord! "Professor" today is very correct, the posts are sensible. Why provoke a quarrel? "Strength of habit" (stamp) ??
  • Agent 008 10 October 2015 12: 10 New
    • 3
    • 0
    +3
    Disposing militants with bombs is a good idea! And also the benefit is that what remains of the militants interspersed with their shit goes to fertilizer ...
  • SeregaBoss 10 October 2015 12: 21 New
    • 2
    • 0
    +2
    Quote: GRAY
    Quote: Serge Boss
    Wow KAB500С costs about 3 lyamov? Richly and effectively, we save Assad.

    I really like the position of our beloved liberals:
    They are bombed by the FABs - an obsolete ineffective weapon and a sign of Russia's lag in the field of high technology.
    They bomb them with CABs - a waste of huge money, it is better to spend them on pensions / medicine / education / to distribute to orphans (underline as necessary).
    Where not to throw - everything is not a horse feed. smile


    Yes, I look I lit up the oil-filled Democrats. I live in your society and did not consider myself a liberalist.
    I think for every purpose I have my own ammunition, at the prices I am surprised because it is really expensive, no one else thinks so? And who will convince me that Assad we are not saving?
    In a democratic society, everyone has their own opinion and right, or not? It is commonplace, yes.
  • Yuyuka 10 October 2015 12: 23 New
    • 7
    • 0
    +7
    Is Russia at war? request So, this shusher, as you put it, has the weight of the right to attack the civilian population of Russia on the territory of Russia itself, following your own formula "Evacuate, switch sides, partisan"?


    Well, about rights - who gives them what rights? What kind of laws do they fight? belay They finally can drum all the laws and rules, including Islam, which hide behind! and they declared war on everyone, including Russia, if you don’t know! hi It’s the same as a bear attacks you in the taiga, and you start telling him about your rights to life, is it interesting to the second point that you will reach the king of nature? or will he first explain his rights to food to you?
  • Nehist 10 October 2015 13: 52 New
    • -13
    • 0
    -13
    For once, having read the comments, I agree with the professor. And yet, yes, when did Russia declare war? By the way, we are now acting like Americans, without looking back at international opinion, we are conducting operations in our own interests, and there is no smell of fighting the international terrorism here. As one director told the CIA, if there hadn’t been terrorism, it would have been worth inventing.
    1. skifd 10 October 2015 14: 39 New
      • 3
      • 0
      +3
      Quote: Nehist
      without looking back international opinion


      Well, damn it .. And this is the most "view""international"becomes only because it is mainly" arrogant "?? am In addition to this podlatnennogo bunch, no one has the right "v.a.k.a.t" ?! Very understandable, it’s difficult with this "linguistic construction" - "between the (?) Backward thinking" .....
      1. padded jacket 10 October 2015 14: 54 New
        • 3
        • 0
        +3
        The results of our VKS strike on terrorists and bandits.
        Only the Russian armed forces will be able to destroy the alliance - terrorists + USA + mercenaries + Israel + Wahhabis - this alliance of "evil" can be stopped only with bombs. There is simply no other solution.
    2. Yuyuka 10 October 2015 15: 03 New
      • 3
      • 0
      +3
      Quote: Nehist
      And yet, yes, when did Russia declare war? By the way, we are acting like Americans


      Well, firstly, the war on terrorism has been declared for a long time, and secondly, international opinion is now being formed easily - no one has canceled the information war! yes, and a little shit - we are in Syria in compliance with international standards, we play according to the rules that exist, unlike our "worst" friends who make their own every morning. Well, but it doesn't smell about it - I agree, there’s a different smell now, hydrogen sulfide repeat
  • Tujh 10 October 2015 14: 54 New
    • 3
    • 0
    +3
    Quote: Professor
    Quote: bashmak
    The fighting takes place during the WAR! Russia is at war with this riffraff! And in the war zone the presence of civilians is a problem for the civilians themselves. Evacuate, switch sides, partisan! Remember the story!

    Is Russia at war? request So, this shusher, as you put it, has the weight of the right to attack the civilian population of Russia on the territory of Russia itself, following your own formula "Evacuate, switch sides, partisan"?

    And you did not forget that this "riffraff" since the mid-90s already in Russia? And note those: they are not playing pranks here.
  • olezenka1 10 October 2015 14: 58 New
    • 1
    • 0
    +1
    Quote: Strashila
    It's the same thing to test weapons in real combat.
    Perhaps we will call the combat zone in Syria the Kura-2 training ground ... and launch from Severodvinsk from the wall of the pier in one gulp the entire ammunition of one of the boats, Sineva with a simple warhead ... that can reach the target much deeper than 20 meters.

    This is too tempting ...) But it must be very effective! ..
    1. padded jacket 10 October 2015 15: 51 New
      • 1
      • 0
      +1
      Syria thanks Russia and its people for their assistance in the fight against terrorism.
      Russia has managed to do more in a few days than the coalition in a year

      And in the meantime:
      Russian Aerospace Forces increased the intensity of sorties in Syria
  • Kibl 10 October 2015 15: 55 New
    • 0
    • 0
    0
    Volumetric explosions must be fucked !!!
  • Mountain shooter 10 October 2015 16: 58 New
    • 2
    • 0
    +2
    With such an intensity of work on large objects, soon they simply will not remain. For such ammunition. Therefore, the professor is right. So far, no such bombs and missiles have been hit with a point and a reduced radius of destruction. So far, no such tasks have been set for ammunition developers. True, ground battles must be fought by Syrian troops. And the VKS are unlikely to be able to support them with bombing in street battles (well, except perhaps by helicopters, but this is a mortal risk for the crews). And there is no longer to minimal damage ...
    1. Scraptor 10 October 2015 17: 04 New
      • 2
      • 0
      +2
      USSR ammunition has flown into the ventilation shafts of bunkers and even into the embrasure of bunkers since the beginning of the 70s, the price of the issue is 100 thousand rubles new. On the contrary, the United States reached such a level only in 2007 ...
  • Redfox3k 10 October 2015 20: 50 New
    • 0
    • 0
    0
    Quote: Nehist
    For once, having read the comments, I agree with the professor. And yet, yes, when did Russia declare war? By the way, we are now acting like Americans, without looking back at international opinion, we are conducting operations in our own interests, and there is no smell of fighting the international terrorism here. As one director told the CIA, if there hadn’t been terrorism, it would have been worth inventing.

    Do you either understand nothing or pretend to be? Confess right away.
  • mich 10 October 2015 21: 00 New
    • 0
    • 0
    0
    The noise flies to the far south
    To Turk and Hungarian -
    And buckets of Slavic sound
    The Germans do not like!
  • hly
    hly 10 October 2015 21: 13 New
    • 2
    • 0
    +2
    GDP comes to work on 8 numbers. With a hangover. Sushnyak. Calls Shoigu .- Seryozha, what was it yesterday? - Yes, all is well.
    - Were there any guests?
    - There were.
    - Was there a bath?
    - It was.
    - Fireworks allowed?
    - Let it go.
    - How did everything go?
    - Yes, everything is fine, Vova.
    - Well then, let's get down to business. How is ISIS?
    - And after your fireworks, Vova, there is no ISIS anymore.
  • arrows 10 October 2015 21: 25 New
    • 0
    • 0
    0
    Quote: Sveles
    although other sources have other data on the accuracy of guidance 4-7m

    http://www.ktrv.ru/production/68/685/799/

    There is data with an even smaller error, as they say, 1-2 meters is a zero error, the above data are very early indicators. 15 meters was a very long time ago, at an early stage.
  • arrows 10 October 2015 21: 31 New
    • 0
    • 0
    0
    Quote: Nehist
    For once, having read the comments, I agree with the professor. And yet, yes, when did Russia declare war? By the way, we are now acting like Americans, without looking back at international opinion, we are conducting operations in our own interests, and there is no smell of fighting the international terrorism here. As one director told the CIA, if there hadn’t been terrorism, it would have been worth inventing.

    You can continue, as one CIA director said: it wouldn’t be nehista, it would be worth it to come up
  • kirillovleva 10 October 2015 22: 26 New
    • 0
    • 0
    0
    prominent emirs and amirs are not the main goal, judging by the war in the Caucasus - they appear like the felled heads of dragons, and the absence of ammunition and fuel is a serious factor
    1. voyaka uh 11 October 2015 14: 55 New
      • 0
      • 0
      0
      I can not agree with you. Talented charismatic
      many leaders are not born. And for mediocrity people
      do not go. Therefore, sometimes the liquidation of the commander of the movement
      eliminates the movement itself. We had such examples:
      killed the commander of the militants, the whole group is self-destructing - the fighters
      just went home.
      Unfortunately, an unpleasant thing happened in Syria - the Iranian died in battle
      the general who was preparing the offensive of the Syrian army.

      But, of course, destroying the arms depot is also very important.
  • dvvv 11 October 2015 15: 22 New
    • 0
    • 0
    0
    It looks like a martyr, and the Iranian Minister of Defense ...
    "Minister of Defense Hossein Dehgan announced the successful test of a long-range high-precision Emad ballistic missile, reports the IRNA portal."

    "Reuters quotes Anthony Kordsman, a researcher at the Center for Strategic and International Studies, who wrote that the range of the Emad rocket can be 1700 km, it can carry 750 kg of payload. According to him, Emad is a modernization of a liquid-fuel rocket "Shahab-3," but the new missile represents a "big leap in terms of accuracy."

    Read more at RBC:
    http://www.rbc.ru/politics/11/10/2015/561a18f29a7947221629cc89
    Profesor, it’s interesting to ask: Does this missile belong to high-precision ammunition or do we have to wait until they come up with a special charge?
  • win
    win 12 October 2015 10: 20 New
    • 2
    • 0
    +2
    what our bombers and attack aircraft take off, flying over the Syrian desert, and whether the jihadist can hide from the pilots of the Su-34.


    Is it worth it to hide? Can immediately "dig into the hole and not live"?
    Exaggerated by the Western media is the power of jihadists. Without the help of the West, they are ZERO.
  • win
    win 12 October 2015 10: 40 New
    • 2
    • 0
    +2
    High-explosive bombs (FAB) have a damaging effect quite acceptable for a given conflict

    A huge number of such aerial bombs have been accumulated in Russian military depots, and disposal at the landfill serves as an alternative to dropping them onto the heads of jihadists.

    That's all they need to be reset. Nothing is sorry for the enemy ...
  • Lumumba 12 October 2015 15: 05 New
    • 0
    • 0
    0
    In my opinion, for a half-ton of explosives, it makes no sense to develop "high-precision guidance for a million." Moreover, the formulation of such a task non-falsely hints at the cut and rollback of budget money allocated for the development of the defense industry. A KVO of 10 to 50 meters is more than enough for a bomb with so many explosives. And it is precisely the hit ability of a conventional enemy in this radius that determines the "precision" of the weapon.

    If with a KVO of 50 meters, within a radius of 50 meters there will be nothing alive and shooting, then such a weapon is certainly highly accurate. And if in a radius of only 25 meters, with a KVO of 50, then this is clearly not a precision weapon.
  • jurijsv 12 October 2015 15: 51 New
    • 0
    • 0
    0
    The main thing is not to rest on our laurels and finish everything to the end, so that again the “truce” does not occur
  • Madcape 12 October 2015 22: 33 New
    • 0
    • 0
    0
    And when will the “Night Hunters” and “Sharks” be checked ?!
  • misterwulf 12 October 2015 23: 12 New
    • 0
    • 0
    0
    Well, maybe. Perhaps you want to believe.