Dear "dad Makarov"

43

In the autumn of 2011, the Makarov pistol celebrates its anniversary. 60 years in service - a very decent time. Although private weapon fairly “conservative” and well-proven systems can remain in service for a long time, while in other types of weapons and military equipment, more than one generation of samples may be replaced. For a start it is worth remembering how and why PM was once created.

Winner of the Stalin Prize

Competition for the new gun was announced in the USSR in 1945 year. The task formulated by GAU featured cartridges 7,62x25 TT, 7,65x17, promising cartridge 9x18. Experimental design set thoroughly. The competition was attended by both experienced designers “with the name” —F.V. Tokarev, P.V. Voevodin, S.A. Korovin, I.I. Rakov, S.G. Simonov, and the young, while little-known — N F. Makarov and K. A. Baryshev from Tula, G. V. Sevryugin, A. A. Klimov and A. I. Lobanov from Izhevsk.

As early as October 1945, the ground tests of Makarov, Sevryugin, Korovin, Rakov, Simonov, Baryshev, Voevodina pistols began. Makarov introduced the 7,65-mm experienced pistol TKB-412 and 9-mm TKB-429. Pistols have been thoroughly tested at the test site of small and mortar weapons in Shchurov. For comparison, foreign pistols were tested with them: “Walter” PP, “Mauser” HSc, “Browning” 1922, “Sauer” 38H, “Beret” 1934, and also TT.

The success fell to the share of TsKB-14 of the Ministry of Armaments Nikolai Fedorovich Makarov. His main competitor at the final stage of the competition was the Baryshev pistol. Tests of 9-mm samples were carried out in 1948-m. The commission selected a sample of Makarov, which was put into service in 1951, under the designation "Makarov's 9-mm pistol (PM) arr. 1951. GAU assigned him an 56-A-125 index. Together with the gun entered service and cartridge type 9х18, developed by B.V. Semin and N.M. Elizarov at the Scientific Research Institute -44 (future TsNIITOCHMASH).

In 1952, Makarov was awarded the III degree Stalin Prize for developing the pistol. 8 on April of the same year, an order was issued by the Chief of 5, the Main Directorate of the Ministry of Arms, to start production of the PM. The issue was organized in Izhevsk at plant number 622 (later Izhevsk Mechanical Plant).

German equivalent: similarities and differences

It is unnecessary to describe the device of the Makarov pistol: it is well known to many. However, until now there are often voices claiming that "Makarov" is only a "slightly modified copy" of the German "Walter" PP, and the cartridge 9х18 is a variation of the 9-mm cartridge "Ultra" by the German company "Geko".

Indeed, after the end of the Great Patriotic War, a significant part of the production of "Karl Walter" in Zella-Melis went to the Soviet side. Moreover, experts of the People's Commissariat (Ministry) of weapons recommended in the development of a gun to focus on the system "Walter". The small-sized Walter RR was indeed one of the best self-loading pistols of the Old and New Worlds, and its scheme after World War II became almost the most replicable in the world. The “Ultra” cartridge, developed before the war to “reinforce” the same “Walter” PP, was between two common 9-mm pistol cartridges - “Parabellum” and “Browning Short”.

Prototypes chosen very well. However, neither the Makarov pistol, nor the pistol cartridge Semin and Elizarov were direct copies of their German counterparts. The design of the PM has been substantially reworked in detail, which makes it possible to consider it a completely independent model - in any case, a more independent system than most of the imitations of the Walter PP scheme in other countries.

Tactical and technical characteristics of PM and small-sized pistols of comparable power, which appeared later
Dear "dad Makarov"


The wide use of the principle of multi-functionality of parts has allowed to simplify the design and increase the reliability of the mechanisms. In particular, the helical combat spring is replaced by a double plate, which acts with a wide pen on the trigger, a narrow one on the cocking lever and the trigger pull, and the lower bend of the spring serves as a magazine latch. The cocking lever at the end of the trigger rod also serves as an uncoupler, while the shutter stop is a reflector of the extracted sleeve.

Replacing a number of axles with axles on the details simplified disassembly and assembly of the gun compared with the same "Walter" PP. Flap non-automatic fuse in the PM made better than in the "Walter" PP: its action is more reliable, and turning the flag when turning off from top to bottom is more natural for the fingers of the hand holding the weapon.

The design of the PM includes all 29 parts, while the Walter PP had about 50, for example, the Czechoslovak CZ 82 (much more successful, by the way) created already later (already 55).

By way of improvement

Establishment of mass production "Makarov" took time. The PM didn’t immediately turn into a standard for a reliable small-sized pistol and was accepted by both users and production workers. The first were mainly officers of the Soviet army, accustomed to ballistics and dimensions of the TT. Although a more convenient grip PM, the descent with a "warning", smaller ballistic impulse and the ratio of recoil energy to the mass of weapons contributed to an increase in shooting accuracy at short distances.


Production workers initially found PM a model of "non-technological design." The aforementioned multifunctionality of parts made them rather complicated for the available technologies, the form was great, the volume of fitting operations. The Izhevsk designers and technologists, among them G.V. Sevryugin, A. A. Klimov, A. A. Belikov, A. N. Molodchenkov, E. V. Lopatkin, M. B. Dorfman, A. M. Pestov, A. V. Kamerilov.

Of course, Makarov himself participated in the production. Especially since I had to make some amendments to the design. In 1953, the shape of the pistol frame was changed, simplifying the trigger guard. The problem of complete interchangeability of parts was solved only by the end of 50-x. Until the beginning of the 60-ies, when the mass production of PM was adjusted, it remained in service with the TT.

In the 60 – 90-ies, V. S. Chuguevsky, A. G. Pasynkov, V. A. Ivanov, A. E. Subbotin, V. A. Kuchumov, have worked to improve the production of Makarov. PM took a lot of technological innovations. Chrome-plating of the bore was introduced, milling of parts from steel forgings was replaced by casting with subsequent milling (casting was introduced during the making of the sear, fuse, trigger, trigger), the handle milled from PCB was pressed.

At the end of the 80-ies began the manufacture of the frame and shutter of the pistol by the method of high-precision investment casting. The result - the complexity of manufacturing one PM with 90 normal hours during the development of mass production decreased to 5 - 18 times. The utilization rate of the metal (the ratio of the mass of the finished part to the mass of the workpiece) in the production of the pistol from the original 0,12 increased almost threefold, the return of the standard pistols from the preliminary tests decreased from 30 to one percent.

Basis for other samples

Not for nothing, it is clear that the authoritative weapon editions of the world, compiling personal weapon ratings, include the PM among the best small-sized pistols, noting the combination of size and weight with the stopping effect of a bullet at short distances, high reliability and survivability. Although both military and police services still prefer small-sized combat pistols for more powerful cartridges - the same 9x19 “Parabellum” for example.


PM - one of the most massive pistols of the second half of the XX century. The number of "Makarov", released only Izhmehom, estimated at about five million units. And you need to take into account the production abroad.

"Makarov" was in service in a dozen states (here it is inferior to its predecessor TT), among which are the former members of the Warsaw Pact and China. Options PM made in Bulgaria, China, GDR, Yugoslavia. Cartridges 9x18 PM are produced or issued in addition to these countries in Libya, Poland, Czechoslovakia, Romania.

It must be admitted that reducing the size of the pistol and cartridge cost ballistic qualities. With the change of the scope and conditions of use of weapons, it became obvious. In 80-ies, it was imperative to increase the accuracy and accuracy of firing of a military pistol, punching the action of the bullet while maintaining stopping action and high readiness for the first shot, increase the capacity of the magazine 1.5-2 times. As part of the developmental work on the “Rook” theme, among others, the development of a high-pulse cartridge 9x18 (7H16) and a pistol modernized under it were retained, while maintaining the basic PM scheme. This option was presented (under the code "Grach-3") Izhevsk designers B. M. Pletsky and R. G. Shigapov. Later, this gun, designed to fire with a regular and high-pulse cartridge 9х18, with a two-row magazine for 12 cartridges, was designated PMM (modernized Makarov pistol) and 56-А-125М index.

From 1994, PMM was serially produced by Izhmekh, delivered to the Ministry of Internal Affairs, the Federal Guard Service, and in small quantities to the army. However, the PMM cartridge was never adopted. In addition to the problems common to the defense industry, the concern was that the high-impulse cartridge with its increased pressure of powder gases would start firing from regular PM, which could lead to accidents and injuries. Together with the patron, PMM’s career gradually faded away. Especially after the adoption of new pistols in 2004 for more powerful cartridges, which were much better suited to the requirements of a modern army pistol.

At the beginning of 2000, Izhmekh presented a variant of the PM system facilitation - young designer D. A. Bogdanov, under the leadership of R. G. Shigapov, created the MP-448 "Skif" and MP-448 "Skiff-mini" pistols for 9х18 and 9Х17 cartridges, which saved basic scheme, but with a completely new plastic frame and some minor changes. Pistols are still experienced.

At the same time, in 90, the changed political and economic situation affected the fate of the PM. The gun served as the basis for commercial, official and civilian designs. So, Izhmekh released export models IZH-70, IZH-70-17 (IZH-70-200), IZH-70 ХЦ (IZH-70-100), auxiliary IZH-71 chambered for 9 x17 “Kurz” several calibers. The IZH-79-2004T traumatic pistol, better known as the Makarych, became more popular and went on sale in 79.

And the bulletproof vest will not save

Together with a pistol six decades of his service, notes and pistol cartridge 9x18 PM. During this time, in addition to the “military” versions with an ordinary shell bullet, many modifications of ammunition were developed, which significantly expanded the capabilities of the complex. Ordinary bullet originally had a lead core (P bullet, 57-H-181 cartridge), but in 1954, a Pst steel bullet with a steel core (57-H-181 cartridge) appeared cheaper in mass production. The cartridge case in 1956 became non-brass bimetallic, the cartridge was sealed with varnish. Steel varnished sleeves were made from 1993. “Stop” ordinary bullets 9x18 PM capable flak jackets hidden and open wearing 1-th class of protection, armored glass class II (IIA).

Developed by V. V. Trunov and P. F. Sazonov, a tracer bullet with a range of tracing up to 150 meters more suited to submachine guns and did not get used with pistols. But its production was restored in 90-e, when interest in machine pistols resumed.

Since the PM entered service not only in the army, but also in the law enforcement agencies, TsNIITOCHMASH developed a cartridge version that meets the specific requirements of their structures.


At the end of the 70-s, by order of the KGB of the USSR, a special cartridge was released for the special units, with a bullet with an armor-piercing core protruding from the shell. The cartridge provides the defeat of manpower in body armor 028-th class of protection with rigid elements such as domestic ZZT-2M. In 71, special 1989x9 cartridges for the MIA appeared.

Despite the emergence of new combat pistol complexes, it is obvious that the PM will remain in service for a long time - the retirement age will certainly increase for him. Moreover, the numerous "Makarovs" have not lost their reliability.

In this regard, developed new versions of the cartridge with a high penetration effect of a bullet for firing from a regular PM. In 1996, NZNVA presented the 7H15 cartridge with an armor-piercing bullet 9 millimeters BJT, but already in 1997 a more successful cartridge with an armor-piercing bullet 9 millimeters PBM developed by the Tula KBP appeared. This ammunition was put into service in the 2005 year and received an index 7H25. Its 3,55 gram bullet (comparable to 6,1 g in Pst bullet) with a protruding armor-piercing core and an initial speed of up to 480 m / s is capable of piercing a steel sheet 10 mm thick (XnUMX bullet 5 mm) or 1,5-mm titanium plate at a distance of 1,4 meters and 30 layers of Kevlar-type fabric, while retaining lethal effects. This allows you to hit a live target in a bullet-proof vest 2-grade protection. At the same time, a cartridge with a low ricochetting bullet with a lead core was created - it received the characteristic designation 9x18 PPO (law-enforcement patron).

By the way, in 1996, for the needs of the Ministry of Internal Affairs in TsKIB SOO under the direction of G. A. Korobov, an original OT-15 “Lin” device was developed for a Makarov pistol - for throwing a thin line from a PM, for example, on a roof or through an obstacle.

It is worth considering the considerable number of holsters and sets of equipment for open and hidden wearing PM created over the past decade and a half for use in various structures. And this is also a component of the pistol complex. Service of the hero of the day continues.
43 comments
Information
Dear reader, to leave comments on the publication, you must sign in.
  1. +1
    26 October 2011 08: 29
    Good old PM!
    1. Old man pohabych
      -3
      28 October 2011 00: 16
      Old? Yes! Kind? I do not agree. Better Tula Tokareva. A separate
      cases - a revolver "Nagant". This one will definitely not let you down! And it doesn't matter that the problem is with recharging. In case of failure "Makara" (at least skew in the chamber) of the second
      they still won’t give a chance!
  2. +3
    26 October 2011 10: 05
    Reliable and simple like all of our weapons. During the time when I used it, there was not enough cartridge power, now I don’t know, I didn’t shoot for 15 years
    1. sirToad
      0
      26 October 2011 10: 10
      nevertheless, it has a somewhat small barrel length. (my personal opinion)
  3. +3
    26 October 2011 11: 04
    It's time to change! Weapon for dispersal of sparrows. How much effort, time, ammunition, had to be spent to teach an ordinary shooter to get out of it. All 8 rounds were shot at a vantage point without stopping, and people who knocked out an average of 90 out of 100 points and hit the target, at best, 2-3, and anywhere. And what can we say about a simple servant shooting at a shooting range of 3 sighting and 3 credits once a month, or even not. The reason for such a low hit rate is a short barrel, strong recoil energy, which is why the bullet’s flight path is very unstable (derivation).
    Of course, many will say that professionals get everything. But! Not all professionals! Ah, a gun is a service weapon!
    My opinion is long over. GSH-18 for example.
    1. 0
      26 October 2011 12: 40
      My opinion is long over. GSH-18 for example.

      I don’t argue for the army and the committee, 92 is enough for the police and the Beretta (according to Nurgaliyev) ...
      1. +1
        13 February 2012 19: 30
        In my opinion, Nurgaliev has "Wishlist" - if true!
    2. Hans grohman
      +1
      2 February 2012 01: 10
      Sancho, I fundamentally disagree with you! PM - a very good machine for its purpose (not military). Soft recoil, quite acceptable accuracy, even to this day, quite normal dimensions and weight. The number of rounds is certainly not enough, but the Pentagon cannot capture it. As for me, the TT will be better.
      And further on mistakes:
      Quote: sancho
      and people who knocked out an average of 90 out of 100 points,

      Which PM exercise do you mean? In the PM - 8 rounds, in the target "bullseye" - it is 10 points. 10 by 8 = 80. Where are the numbers from? Maybe you confused with exercise # 1 for AK?
      Quote: sancho
      The reason for such a low hit rate is a short barrel, strong recoil energy, which is why the bullet’s flight path is very unstable (derivation).

      I don’t like to cite the wiki as a source, but I think in this case it is possible: "Derivation in military affairs means the deviation of shells and bullets of rifled weapons in the direction of rotation [1] when flying from a given trajectory due to the gyroscopic effect." On my own I would like to add, the derrivation when shooting 7.62 * 54, begins to affect 800 meters (if the target is closer, then D. is not taken into account).

      I am not a professional, but from PM, I got confidently and stably. Yes, an exercise with shooting for a while, we also shot - most, quite tolerably. I won’t tell you for GSh-18, because I’m not personally familiar with it, but I would take PM - if such an opportunity happened.
    3. +1
      13 February 2012 19: 28
      I support! But it’s expensive, probably ... And cartridges!
      1. Hans grohman
        0
        17 February 2012 00: 01
        Quote: Bear52
        But it’s expensive, probably ... And cartridges!

        If you are talking about PM, then it is not so much expensive (about 200-300 American rubles), but not entirely legal, with all that it implies. And cartridges are much easier to get than, say, the same .45, but in general I agree, "it's troublesome" (c)
    4. valex
      0
      23 September 2012 22: 43
      - "because of which the trajectory of the bullet is not very stable (derivation)." - With such "deep knowledge of external ballistics" and only reach the rank of major! You should at least be a field marshal! Derivation is the deflection of the bullet by about two minutes from the line of sight, due to the rotation under the influence of the rifling. And, since the energy of the Luger cartridge is greater, then the recoil force is also greater
  4. Owl
    +2
    26 October 2011 12: 16
    Reliable, unpretentious, as a weapon for self-defense is sufficient, if you take "to work", then only as a "second barrel", during business trips he carried with him a PM equipped with 9 rounds and a spare magazine with 8 rounds (for inspecting basements, buses, so as not to get captured).
    1. sirToad
      +2
      26 October 2011 12: 38
      who argues! Himself 6 years with this went to the service. and was on business trips with him. but the trunk is still a bit short. and so of course - one to send all the rest, as it should.
  5. +2
    26 October 2011 12: 37
    In my opinion, it is necessary to divide the pistols into military, police and for special services. If the police in the city of Makarka is enough, then for the army it is already weak ... IMHO a weapon for suicide ...
    1. 0
      13 February 2012 19: 36
      I support! For a long time it is necessary to move away from universality! The same pistol for a combat officer and a policeman - in no way can be equally good!
  6. dred
    +1
    26 October 2011 13: 17
    weak cartridge
    1. sirToad
      +2
      26 October 2011 13: 50
      why weak?
      1. Old man pohabych
        -1
        28 October 2011 00: 19
        Strong only for the temple of the owner of this "fart"!
  7. KASKAD
    +1
    26 October 2011 14: 06
    To stop the enemy’s manpower, in addition to the cartridge, a morally obsolete magazine, and the method of changing it, sights, also not so good in rate of fire and accuracy, and the barrel resource is scanty compared to the same Glock, Glock is probably one of the most advanced pistols of which I shot, although the Grand Power K100 was not inferior to him in quality and thoughtfulness nevertheless, Glock is a more elaborate design. And the PM was morally obsolete a long time ago, even its 9 * 18 cartridge is banned for sale in many European countries for self-defense weapons as it is not capable of guaranteed stopping the enemy.
    1. Owl
      -1
      26 October 2011 14: 39
      try "expansive"
      1. KASKAD
        +2
        26 October 2011 18: 09
        There is no expansive 9 * 18, this is the second time the expansion against bronik is zero in the third PM and so oblique due to the short barrel and with the expansive you will fall half a meter to the right or left, and if you make an expansive bullet for 9 * 18 then with speed 315m \ s it will have even less stopping action than a bullet with a Full Metal Jacket.
        Who else will offer what?
        1. Owl
          +1
          27 October 2011 12: 17
          exist, if you have not seen them, then I periodically shoot them and with me on business trips one store was filled with them, in NIIST they shot 9x18 expansive ones on "soft" armor (SVM or Kevlar) and got a better result than a standard bullet (effect "chisels", the fabric was simply cut down)
        2. Hans grohman
          0
          2 February 2012 01: 13
          Quote: KASKAD
          PM and so oblique because of the short trunk

          A bad dancer is a good father!
          No offense.
    2. Uncle Sam
      -1
      26 October 2011 23: 34
      for sure, while you’re yanking the clip out of it especially in the parking lot and if your hands are wet
      1. Owl
        +3
        27 October 2011 12: 19
        learn to shoot, if YOU learn to shoot from PM, you will successfully shoot from any sample of short-barreled weapons
  8. SIA
    SIA
    +3
    26 October 2011 18: 12
    On the very first photo, the gasman generally lies, 6P42-7.62mm. If only they wouldn’t save on the pictures, they would put the original PM.
    1. KASKAD
      0
      26 October 2011 18: 14
      By the way, I also wanted to write about it.
  9. Uncle Sam
    -3
    26 October 2011 22: 10
    Yes, the gun is just shit, only shoot point-blank at the wall, tt two heads higher, on all the offsets from tt was the leader, pm you take it - at least catch the target
    1. +2
      26 October 2011 22: 35
      Yes, the TT thing is of course ... Just removed it from service for some reason, as for me it’s so super barrel.
      1. Uncle Sam
        -1
        26 October 2011 23: 31
        many in Chechnya had TT and stechkina and margolins
        1. Owl
          -2
          27 October 2011 12: 21
          there were still bows, arrows and spears
      2. Old man pohabych
        +1
        28 October 2011 00: 23
        For its time, the instrument is very good, and now, in certain circles, it is respected for its reliability, simplicity and excellent powerful 7,62x25.
    2. Owl
      +2
      27 October 2011 12: 20
      learn to shoot
      1. 0
        28 October 2011 00: 47
        learn to shoot

        Of what?
    3. Hans grohman
      +1
      2 February 2012 01: 18
      Quote: Uncle Sam
      Yes, the gun is just shit, only shoot point-blank at the wall, tt two heads higher, on all the offsets from tt was the leader, pm you take it - at least catch the target

      Before writing this, it would be useful to shoot from both systems !!!
      In fact, everything is exactly the opposite! And yes - when shooting at a shooting range (especially with poor bullets) at 25 meters, you can get non-acid return from the TT! From PM - excluded.
  10. boos24
    +1
    27 October 2011 10: 12
    I’m very pleased with the barrel for wearing Baikal-442 all the time, I never misfired super and never got stuck, of course there was something more powerful for the army and a beautiful trunk for self-defense
  11. zavesa01
    +2
    28 October 2011 10: 30
    you need to be able to shoot, it’s a fact, but the fact that the stopping effect of the cartridge is weak is yes.
  12. dred
    0
    18 November 2011 13: 15
    TT is better. Personally my opinion.
  13. +2
    8 January 2012 22: 55
    I still remember my native PM, number IU 3626, which has never failed me. And I put all the bullets from it at 10,9, 8. An excellent gun. You just need to be able to shoot!
  14. +1
    18 January 2012 22: 50
    To burn two or three hundred rounds a month is the dream of any servant. And if they still do not interfere, the limit of dreams. But they noticed correctly, the cartridge is weak and there are not enough 8 in the clip, even 9 with a reload. But another 9 mm PAR has 8.8 mm in diameter, and PM-9.2 mm. Why not initially reduce the caliber and arrange the cartridges in a checkerboard pattern. A large number does not happen to be superfluous, it is not vodka.
  15. +2
    28 January 2012 22: 01
    I don't understand why the owl is being minus. He correctly says: "Learn to shoot!" If you know the materiel and know how to make a smooth descent, you will get to where you aim. Train your hands and eye! And if legs grow from the shoulders, then even the most sophisticated trunk will not save you trouble. I have a PM 1953 release. And I don't fire a bullet from the nine. I adhere to the rule "Weapon - that a woman - loves affection and care." Those who live by the principle - "a gun that a woman - will never refuse" are quickly disappointed in their point of view. I have never had a weapon failure.
    1. +1
      29 January 2012 01: 19
      For training — even the initial one — it’s necessary to use a barrel specially designed for this, even with the most worn mechanism. This is to prevent premature wear of personal weapons. In the case of training with a gun, a kink in the trigger head often occurred at the location axis of the striker. When training with a margolin or other weapon with a circular ignition capsule, the striker malfunctions or kinks. In weapons with a striker, protruding part of the shutter-cup stop of the bottom of the sleeve, the shutter does not close and the trigger does not work. The same goes for the trigger mechanisms. Of course, one must shoot one’s own weapon — there aren’t two perfectly identical sighting lines. Well, to clean, lubricate and store, God himself ordered it!
  16. Axel
    0
    2 May 2012 22: 29
    In the shooting range, he fired from a PMa with a maximum of 27 from 25m and then after long training of 10 PMs, two were not badly shot, the PM-12 was replaced by Fort-30 without shooting for the first time, shooting 25 from XNUMXm