Sphinx SDP Modular Guns

Production models of Sphinx Systems pistols line started about 30 years ago. It all started with the release of pistols CZ-75 in Czechoslovakia on behalf of the Swiss company, known in 80-x under the name ITM. The AT-84, AT-84S pistol models eventually gained popularity and, after upgrading, appeared like AT-2000 and AT-3000. By 2010, the Sphinx brand became part of the international holding KRISS International, the website reports http://www.all4shooters.com.

This international group is engaged in the release of small weapons. Not so long ago, another modernization of the Vector-KRISS "Vector Gen.2" submachine gun with an adjustable telescopic butt, folding in a horizontal plane, was released on behalf of KRISS International.

Returning to the "Sphinx", it should be noted that this company over the years has offered buyers self-loading pistols of the series Special Duty Pistols. Representatives of this line of weapons were shown at the international arms exhibition in the German Nuremberg. We are talking about guns Sphinx SDP, which was originally conceived as a weapon for shooting sports and self-defense. The company set ambitious goals to create a pistol, which the client will pay attention to because of the high quality and reliability of the weapon.

The Sphinx SDP model is based on the technological principles of the proven and highly reliable CZ-75 with a single-action or double-action trigger mechanism with a low-profile trigger. It should be noted that for Sphinx SDP pistols a single caliber is provided - 9 mm. In addition, all models of the pistol use ammunition from a double-row magazine for a different number of rounds: 10, 13, 15 and 17 units. The shop is made of metal, and the number of cartridges in it depends on the model of the gun. At the same guns Sphinx SDP created in rich color and texture palette. It is not only a classic of black color, but also pistols with light, color and “metallized” frames.

The Sphinx SDP weapon line is distinguished from other similar company lines by the rich selection of color and texture palettes, as well as the originality of the frame design itself. For manufacturing-shutter casing stainless steel applied with a special coating layer of titanium nitride-aluminum coupling TiAlN. This coating provides high wear resistance. A similar coating, by the way, is used for cutting plumbing (carpentry) tools.

The frame of the gun consists of 2-x parts. Its upper part is made of anodized machined aluminum. It can be supplied (depending on the variant of the weapon and its length) with a strap "Picatinny" allows to install additional gun tactical accessories. The lower part of the pistol frame is a technological product made of high-strength polymer. It should be noted that the polymer formula of the company KRISS Arms keeps a secret, stating only that this is a multicomponent composition of a special combination.

Pistols of the Sphinx SDP series will be provided in three different sizes. This is the SDP "Standard" model with a barrel length of 4.5 "(114,3 mm). The total length of the gun is 8.3 inches (21,08 cm) and the weight will be 891 g. The next model is the SDP model" Compact "with a barrel about 95 mm in total 188 mm long and weighing about 924 g. And the third option is SDP "Subcompact", the name of which implies that its dimensions are minimized. Thus, the gun comes with a barrel 79,5 mm long, total length not more than 168 mm and weight of all 709 year

Option SDP gun "Standard" was conceived for shooting IPSC competitions. Its alternative name is "Production". The pistol will be supplied with a finely tuned trigger, also with fully adjustable sights.

Comments

[corporal]

I would like to add with guns.ru
"These pistols in various versions are in service with the police units of Australia, Belgium, Venezuela, Norway, Switzerland. Sphinx pistols in the world of weapons are comparable to Swiss watches - they are distinguished by the highest quality workmanship, excellent ergonomics, almost 100% reliability and a very high price." (from)

"Several variants of pistols are produced, differing in that they have either a conventional safety catch, locking the trigger and sear both in the deflated and cocked state, as well as variants with a safety trigger lever instead of a safety catch" (c)

[alex-cn]

And how are they modular? Or didn’t I understand something?

[corporal]

I also did not understand about the modularity - neither the caliber nor the length of the barrel does not change.
Magazine capacity and handle pads are not "modular".
Z.Y. Maybe translation features?

[Hell's Angel]

"VO" is "poisoning the soul" again. Of course not, you need to write about the achievements of gunsmiths in other countries. But! Specifically for pistols, well, this is impossible without the development of the civilian weapons market. I'm specifically talking about allowing civilians to own and carry pistols. When the "ruble will vote" for this or that model, then the manufacturers will "move". And the power structures will take everything they have! Where to go.

[candy wrapper13]

* I’m specifically talking about allowing civilians to own and carry pistols.*-

[Verum]

Quote: Hell Angel

"VO" is "poisoning the soul" again. Specifically for pistols, well, this is impossible without the development of the civilian weapons market.

Why do you need a weapon? Self-esteem can be raised without it. After all, a solid "IPSC instructor".

[Hell's Angel]

Why do you need a weapon? Self-esteem can be raised without it. After all, a solid "IPSC instructor".
Well, I’m serving yet. I am not about myself, but the rest of the citizens. If you know what I mean.

[Verum]

Quote: Hell Angel

Well, I’m serving yet.

Tell me also that in 273 RCs or military unit 55433.

Quote: Hell Angel

I am not about myself, but the rest of the citizens.

In the current reality, our citizens need weapons like a cow's saddle, for there is no and will not be a culture of handling weapons or just real prices for these weapons, as well as normal laws. Who needs a weapon, he already has it for a long time.

Quote: Hell Angel

If you know what I mean.

This meaningful saying. Do you understand the very essence of the issue?

[would]

for no culture of handling weapons

Which is a kind of spherical horse that seems to be there, but where exactly no one can say. But everyone mentions him. There is no culture of handling weapons in the modern world, but what was before was just ritual activities. There are simple rules for handling weapons that are not learned by an idiot in a few hours.

or just real prices

It seems like normal prices.

[Verum]

Quote: rait

Which is a kind of spherical horse which seems to be

It can be seen for you this is really a spherical horse. Just do not take into account that having a weapon other than possession, you should know how to use it, and not go and shoot at a neighbor who turned on the drill on Sunday. By the way, 50% of injury owners do this, wave them anyway.

Quote: rait

It seems like normal prices

Well, yes, Glock from 1000 bucks, a Viking for 500 bucks, GSh-18S for 700 bucks. Despite the fact that these trunks abroad are at least 2 times cheaper.

[vladimir_krm]

Again, with us AK can be taken for 35 bucks, PM is even cheaper, I invite :) And then they will give it for free.
Yes, and a three-room apartment in a 9-story Brezhnevka for 400 bucks ...

[would]

Just do not take into account that having a weapon besides possession, you must know how to use it

This is exactly what I was talking about. The fact that you are citing as an example has nothing to do with the mythical culture of gun ownership, but is the rules for handling weapons in which, among other things, the boundaries of application are very clearly spelled out. Actually knowing the other adherents of the myth of the "culture of gun ownership" you will continue to pass off the elementary rules of handling weapons for "culture of gun ownership."

Injuries are not weapons at all and are a separate issue.

Well, yes, Glock from 1000 bucks, a Viking for 500 bucks, GSh-18S for 700 bucks

So I was not talking about pistols because they cannot be bought now, alas. And about the long barrel :)

[would]

Why do you need a fire extinguisher in a car? Self-esteem can be raised without it.

I could still remember about a mobile phone, a first-aid kit, medical skills and so on. The bottom of the logic would be the same.

[vitalius]

Quote: Verum

Why do you need a weapon? Self-esteem can be raised without it. After all, a solid "IPSC instructor".

Do not judge by yourself, for a normal person, self-esteem is far from the main reason for acquiring weapons.

[vladimir_krm]

Well, let's say I perfectly own a firearm, and it may happen that he helps me in defense. And even then in court it will be possible to prove (gee-gee) that I fought back from bandits, and not from innocent babies-majors with rich dads who were just asked to smoke. But most likely I’ll sit, and not they.

But.

I will not say that my beautiful wife also owns him, and at the right moment she won’t be confused. The same can be said of an elderly mother. And the son is still a minor, he is not supposed to. I don’t feel like thinking about my daughter at all. And I physically cannot accompany and protect them all at once! Just not torn.

Conclusion? It is necessary to demand not firearms, but order in the country, so that a firearm could not be needed. And to whom to raise self-conceit is pliz to us, in the Donbass. At least on one side of the front, at least on the other, according to beliefs. What problems? Are they shooting here? What do you want? :)

[Alex_Rarog]

And who you respected at first was in the militia, won't you forgive "nude hunters or poachers? (Himself such)" Didn't they give zvizdyuly to geeks at first? But what if every adequate person in Donbass and Lugansk had at least one PM or Vepr? What would be worse?
Nah ... your self-esteem, nah ... all show off, if it weren’t for the second warehouse in my pocket, I would lie with my wife in the depths ...

[otto meer]

Quote: Alex_Rarog

if it weren’t for the second warehouse in my pocket, I would lie with my wife in the depths ...

I am sincerely happy for you and completely in solidarity, it’s better to let me be judged by 12 than by 6 ... I also had the "good fortune" to break a road "baseball player" in front of my wife and little son. It's still a pleasure. And if she and her son would be traveling alone? What then? So everything is true

Quote: Alex_Rarog

Nah ... your self-esteem, nah ... all show off

[vladimir_krm]

But what if every adequate person in Donbass and Lugansk had at least a PM or a Boar? What would be worse?

No PM against the tanks will help. Will we allow tanks for personal use? :)

if it weren’t for the second warehouse in my pocket, I would lie with my wife in the depths ...

And if the wife was alone? What about a 15 year old daughter? :(
We have already obtained permits for karate (they were also once forbidden), for gas cartridges and stun guns, gas pistols, injuries, not to mention useless flaubers, and I don’t know how it is with pneumatics, but in the free sale there are such that they break through the twenty ... Where is the limit? Tank? Remember the joke about "... and no women!" :)

[would]

But most likely I’ll sit, and not they.

This is not a matter of weapons, but of the law.

so that the firearm could not be needed.

This is a utopia where there are fortunetellers who predict any crime or force fields that will protect against any encroachment. In our harsh reality, even in countries with a low crime rate and a good law enforcement system, you will have to defend yourself at least until the arrival of the police.

[vladimir_krm]

This is not a matter of weapons, but of the law.

More precisely - corrupt judges. Or judges who are threatened by very large uncles, against whom the firearm will not save, even though they have one.

It is in utopia

I was born and raised in this utopia ...

[would]

More precisely - corrupt judges

It depends. In our country, laws are written like this together with orders of the Ministry of Internal Affairs and others ...

I was born and raised in this utopia.

So carefully closed their eyes to the surrounding reality.

[vladimir_krm]

In our country, laws are written like this together with orders of the Ministry of Internal Affairs and others ...

Well, what am I talking about? You can pass a law on firearms. And you can edit the same laws to do without weapons. What's better?

So carefully closed their eyes to the surrounding reality

Apparently, you are too young, not caught ... Back in the 60s, fights were according to the rules of a kind of ethics: one-on-one, until the first blood, they do not beat someone lying down, etc. And even more so they did not finish off with their feet. By the end of the 60s, this was gradually forgotten. At the same time, the word "dudes" and the Western cult of cynicism and selfishness appeared ... the film was not so long ago ...
But in some closed towns, like in Priozersk, and in the 80s, you could walk all night - no one will touch you unless you ask. If you ask for it - it’s not a pity, they’ll write out :)

Injuries are not weapons at all and are a separate issue.

History:
1. Banned karate in the 80s. They got permission. With the same complaints about the need for defense. Now karate is known to bandits and rare athletes. And the inhabitants said that karate is not a weapon, and began to advocate for gas canisters.
2. Allowed cans. So what? Do many wear them? No, "this is not a weapon at all," gas pistols were demanded.
3. Allowed. Again, it’s not a weapon at all. We demand trauma.
4. "it's not a weapon at all." We require firearms. Where is the limit ??
Guys, if all of the above did not help you, the gunshot will not help either!
In addition, I recall that the PM has an aiming range of 50 meters, but the lethal force is 350! You are defending yourself against gopniks in the gateway, and a child is walking a couple of hundred meters away. Are you ready to become his killer? Then neither PM nor even a sawn fly will help you save his precious skin from his dad. And, frankly, the road is there for you. You do not think about your children, much less others, do not think about your parents and wives - you only think about yourself, your beloved.

[would]

Back in the 60s, fights were according to the rules of a kind of ethics: one on one, until the first blood, they didn’t beat the speed bump, etc.

Apply the particular to the big picture further on. And in the 60s, they killed with chains, cut them with knives, and so on. You just need to distinguish between an ordinary brawl, "valiant prowess" and crime. At the same time, during the times of the liberal USSR, the same geologists were given military firearms not registered anywhere so that they could fight off poachers and various diggers, including the "redhead" (do you at least know what it is?). A couple of shots "somewhere there" saved the lives of more than one geologist. In general, the USSR was extremely liberal at certain periods, and my parents also fired rifles in schools without any excesses.

Now karate bandits and rare athletes know

AND? I’ll tell you a terrible secret, but karate is not a technique of self-defense but a martial art applicable maximum on the tatami. And no special skills are needed for an attack, so the bandits didn’t know karate and don’t know because discipline is needed here, studying with no practical result on the street. But a typical attack by a crowd with armatures that does not require any special skills allows you to beat to death even a FSO veteran who has been taught the applied defense system for decades.

Do many wear them? No, "this is not a weapon at all," gas pistols were demanded.

And again, a typical generalization is underway. Those who want to wear it and yes: A gas spray is not a weapon, but an effective means of neutralization in a certain situation. Then comes the mention of a gas pistol and trauma which are other types of special equipment and are applicable in other situations where a spray can is often not applicable. The gunshot is again another tool that is used in a completely different situation where no spray can help. But you don’t care, the main thing is to pile everything up and state.

Guys, if all of the above did not help you, the gunshot will not help either!

After all, you are not familiar with the materiel and weapons from the word and do not understand that the funds you listed are used in different situations and have a different mechanism of action. Well, why find out something? After all, you can just write a different nonsense and consider yourself right. If you describe how these funds neutralize the goal, then I will apologize and take my words back.

In addition, I recall that the PM has an aiming range of 50 meters, but the lethal force is 350!

Another pearl of a person who is unfamiliar with weapons, even at a theoretical level. Slaughter force in meters is not measured.

[would]

You are defending yourself against gopniks in the gateway, and a child is walking a couple of hundred meters away. Are you ready to become his killer?

Another pearl. I’m already silent about the typical fantasy of the situation when there is a child in the gateway when the gopniks attack (they hang out right next to the fights) several hundred meters away (the gateway is hundreds of meters, yeah). If you were familiar with the shooting technique at least at a theoretical level, you would know the main rule "shoot at a target knowing what is behind the target and only at the target" and the rules of terminal ballistics together with the design of the bullet, which is developed according to this science. The bullet of the pistol is designed in such a way that it would enter the body and reach the internal organs, but not leave it, which is why penetrating wounds are a phenomenon and even if they are present, the semi-jacketed bullet is too deformed and has lost energy to cause any harm. That is why I am not aware of a single such case, including even when using firearms in broad daylight in a busy place.

At the same time, as a stranger to you, even with minimal knowledge, you don’t have an understanding that I will use the spray can first of all against the gopniks, and I’ll grasp the firearm only in the absence of other options, all the more so for PM with meager 9x18. Just spray can in a certain situation is more effective than a firearm. However, you don’t even understand what it is all about and how injury, spray can, gunshot neutralize the attacker and therefore write such nonsense.

In this case, the message is a typical delirium of hoplophoba

. And you can edit the same laws to do without weapons.

The fact that the law is a piece of paper which can be wiped as part of an attack does not concern you by itself. That is why the police carry as a weapon not the Criminal Code and Coapp RF, but a pistol. The guys with AK walking under my windows every day also have some kind of law there and some kind of charter do not wear them as weapons.

And, frankly, the road is there for you. You do not think about your children, much less others, do not think about your parents and wives - you only think about yourself, your beloved.

Typical hoplophobic unfounded accusation. Only this is what you are proposing to make a citizen defenseless against crime, it is you who are proposing to give robbers rob and kill with impunity, it is you who suggest killers knowing that there will be no answer.

[vitalius]

Quote: vladimir_krm

Well, let's say I perfectly own a firearm, and it may happen that he helps me in defense. And even then in court it will be possible to prove (gee-gee) that I fought back from bandits, and not from innocent babies-majors with rich dads who were just asked to smoke. But most likely I’ll sit, and not they.
But.
I will not say that my beautiful wife also owns him, and at the right moment she won’t be confused. The same can be said of an elderly mother. And the son is still a minor, he is not supposed to. I don’t feel like thinking about my daughter at all. And I physically cannot accompany and protect them all at once! Just not torn.

Yes, even if they put you in prison, you or those who are dear to you will be alive, you can get out of prison, but you can’t leave the grave.

Quote: vladimir_krm

It is necessary to demand not firearms, but order in the country, so that a firearm could not be needed.

As soon as the police officer’s teleport is invented at the victim’s mental request to the crime scene, then the need for a firearm may disappear.

Quote: vladimir_krm

And to whom to raise self-conceit is pliz to us, in the Donbass. At least on one side of the front, at least on the other, according to beliefs. What problems? Are they shooting here? What do you want? :)

Do not judge by yourself, for a normal person, self-esteem is far from the main reason for acquiring weapons.

[Hell's Angel]

Tell me also that in 273 RCs or military unit 55433.
No. And should?
for there is no culture of handling weapons or simply real prices for these weapons
And where does all this come from if there is no market?
This meaningful saying. Do you understand the very essence of the issue?
I understand. AND YOU?

[Verum]

Quote: angel of hell

No. And should?

You declare yourself as an experienced veteran. Yes, and training is only in 55433.
There are no others in Novosib. But the trouble is, there is no fixed weapon in the training ...

Quote: Hell Angel

And where does all this come from if there is no market?

What market are you talking about? Does the market provide a weapon culture? In how you bent. In the days of the USSR, the culture of circulation developed at the lessons of the NVP, where even girls knew how to handle weapons. Not to mention the basics of shooting.

Quote: Hell Angel

I understand. AND YOU?

I understand that only readers of this thread are not telepathic.

[Hell's Angel]

In the days of the USSR, the culture of circulation developed at the lessons of the NVP, where even girls knew how to handle weapons. Not to mention the basics of shooting.
Here - and then "the dog rummaged"! You almost answered your own question (Do you understand the very essence of the issue?)
With CWP, the tension is now, with the desire of a person to engage in shooting sport is also not easy. And with "permission to own", there will be shooting ranges and shooting ranges and price competition.

[Verum]

Quote: Hell Angel

And with "permission to own", there will be shooting ranges and shooting ranges and price competition.

Not really? But the article on exceeding the necessary self-defense has not yet been canceled, and is unlikely to be canceled. And with it, whether you have a weapon or not, the one who used the weapon is always to blame. And while those in power are afraid that these weapons will turn against them, there will be no legalizations and free sales.

Quote: Hell Angel

"permission to own"

Permission to store or carry.

[Hell's Angel]

But the article on exceeding the necessary self-defense has not yet been canceled, and is unlikely to be canceled. And with it, whether you have a weapon or not, the one who used the weapon is always to blame. And while those in power are afraid that these weapons will turn against them, there will be no legalizations and free sales.

Here you are right! By the way, in the "allow - not allow" disputes, almost everyone agrees on this.

Yes, and training is only in 55433.
There are no others in Novosib.
There is. Offhand: the Institute of the FSB and the UCHT FSIN ... Maybe look there? Or where else ...?
But the trouble is, there is no fixed weapon in the training ...
Is.

[Verum]

Quote: Hell Angel

Institute of the FSB and UchTs FSIN

1. The Institute is engaged in the retraining of lawyers, shoot go to ROSNO
2. Not UchTs, but SMUTs - a sight laser shooting range.

Quote: Hell Angel

Maybe look there? Or where else ...?

As the saying goes, look and find ...

Quote: Hell Angel

Is.

Yes, there is a weapon, but it is not assigned to anyone, there is a responsible person who deals with it. Weakly know the subject ...

[otto meer]

All "breaking copies" on the topic allow-forbid are meaningless at the moment. While there is no normal law on self-defense, on the inviolability of life and property, this is all from the category of reasoning "is there life on Mars." The words that “if you allow it, then everyone will shoot each other right there”, in my opinion, is stupidity and an insult to the people. So says the one who thinks that the Russian people consists entirely of unbalanced alcoholics-drug addicts, with pronounced destructive inclinations. This is not at all the case. "In Russia today there are more than five million registered hunting weapons, including rifled ones. According to statistics, the percentage of [criminal] use of firearms permitted for hunting is less than tenths of a percent. In Russia, according to statistics, legal weapons (also weapons with rifled barrel) is used in crimes against the person extremely rarely - about 5-10 cases per year throughout the country. " This is a statistic, and there is no condemnation against it. Or here's another. "Professor David Mustard recently published a study in the Journal of Law and Economics that states that states where citizens are allowed to carry weapons are dropping by two percent annually.
Independent Institute of the United States, University of Chicago, studies have been conducted. In states where concealed carrying of weapons is allowed, the overall level of criminal manifestations is less by 22 percent, the rate of homicide is 33 percent, robberies are 37, and serious bodily harm is 14.
States in America where covert carrying weapons are allowed, citizens kill twice as many criminals as police officers. According to statistics, states in America where citizens are allowed to carry weapons in secret have an overall violent crime rate that is 18% LOWER compared to states where they carry weapons. forbidden. The murder rate in the 'armed' states is 33% LOWER, the robbery rate is 37% LOWER. "
Is there anything to object to?
But once again, this is all nonsense, without a normal legislative framework.

[gladcu2]

It makes no sense to carry weapons hidden if they are legally permitted to be worn. Moreover, openly demonstrative wearing warns in advance of the conflict.

Strange statistics you give. From experience, I did not pay attention to statistics. She is often manipulated in her own interests.
Trust in life logic.

[vladimir_krm]

Picture: 30 degrees of heat, a T-shirt, shorts and ... a hefty holster on its side :)

[gladcu2]

Yes, that's right. So in Israel they go. But with a hefty holster for more than 2 weeks, only finished fans or fools go.

For these purposes, a compact with a small store is suitable.

But the subcompact is for hidden wear. It should be small, light and smooth, without sharp corners. Without sights (flies) and of course without ribbed picatini.

The fact is that the subcompact has only one normal place where it can be worn. This is in a belt holster or behind a belt on a clip dedicated to a gun. In either case, the gun touches bare skin and over time creates significant inconvenience.
Subcompact exotic worn on the ankle, in a special holster. But this is a big nonsense. There have been cases of the loss of a pistol while running, all the more.

So all three niches of the army pistol, compact and subcompact have their purpose.

[vladimir_krm]

So says the one who thinks that the Russian people consist entirely of unbalanced alcoholic drug addicts, with pronounced destructive inclinations

Are all the gopniks and bandits foreigners?

use of firearms permitted for hunting - less than tenths of a percent

Well, I have Izh-12. Hefty and heavy. I introduced myself to him on the street :)

In states of America where secretive weapons are permitted, citizens kill twice as much criminalsthan the police ... Is there anything to object to?

Who is the criminal decides the court. And in the United States, policemen now use weapons without thinking, even against children. Read the press. If not for permission to wear, they would at least have thought. And so - they also think that their lives are more expensive.

[otto meer]

Quote: gladcu2

It makes no sense to carry weapons hidden

But if it is a subcompact, then wearing it openly is at least just ridiculous. And if "Weapons Carrier" is a lady?

Quote: gladcu2

Moreover, openly demonstrative wearing warns in advance of the conflict.

In the case of some kind of "spontaneous" conflict - yes, I agree.

Quote: gladcu2

Strange statistics you give.

And why did it seem strange to you. Whoever would say that, but you with American weapons with you and more knowledgeable and competent in this matter simply can not be found.

Quote: vladimir_krm

So says the one who thinks that the Russian people consist entirely of unbalanced alcoholic drug addicts, with pronounced destructive inclinations
Are all the gopniks and bandits foreigners?

Not when I was not interested in what the Gopniks and bandits think to themselves. Foreigners gopnik? You decidedly confused me! I ask - make your idea simpler. I don’t understand what you mean by that.

Quote: vladimir_krm

Well, I have Izh-12. Hefty and heavy. I introduced myself to him on the street :)

Now imagine this "caramultuk" in the hands of an alcoholic neighbor, it's not so much fun, right? No need to bring it to the point of absurdity.

Quote: vladimir_krm

Who is the criminal decides the court.

and let him decide, for God's sake. Only when Gopniks are foreigners (no offense, I just really liked it, really!) You will be cut with laces in the park, then I assure you, not before the court.

Quote: vladimir_krm

And in the United States, policemen now use weapons without thinking, even against children. Read the press. If not for permission to wear, they would at least have thought.

And we now have such a company, "like in the States, everything sucks!" Have you been there for a long time? Have you seen everything with your own eyes? I'm not saying that this is not there. There is. But these are isolated cases. It's just that our media give these cases a certain resonance. Artificially inflated. Or do you think we don't have that? It's just that it is "hushed up". That's all.

Quote: vladimir_krm

And so - they also think that their lives are more expensive.

I apologize, but do you think otherwise?

[gerc]

Nice pistols, Sphinx SDP "Compact" is practically a copy of my CZ 75 P-07 Duty, but for sure much more expensive, Duty took $ 450.

[gladcu2]

With a weapon, self-esteem is easier to raise. Without weapons, you have to go to gyms for years.

Modularity apparently includes stem changes. This is a trend.

It's nice that they began to separate the compact and subcompact. Since the destination is completely different. There seems to be a weight error in the article.

A little annoying angularity of the pistol in the compact class. Smoothed forms are also priority.
The price bar associated with workmanship is fully justified. 300 dollars to start and up to 2000 at the finish is quite normal price range.

For subcompact picatini is not needed.

[31rus]

With our lawmakers, you yourself, dear ones, do not want to have a trunk (if there is a law), and they cut the police all, so you need to write correctly, you will find that according to the law, that without it, there is one result when applied, so everyone chooses for himself

[Massik]

Well, judging by the comments - as in a saying: Started for health, finished for peace!

[ingenera]

I imagined: here all (or many) carry weapons ... Will it be the same as with car owners? With PMs they will give way to everyone, with Stechkin it is already abruptly, and if Glock or Beretta, then just hold on! Joke! In the concept of "culture of handling ... (anything)" the key word is "culture".

[Zingvar]

Nice trunk. Give two.

[gladcu2]

A subcompact (almost compact) is not ashamed to carry openly, if allowed. Subcompact is the size of the PM. This size is best suited for everyday wear by officials and civilians.

The compact is designed for hidden wear.
It is a weapon to increase self-esteem or confidence. Weapons that in principle will never be needed, which is why they created it. It is, as it were, but it is not. Because real efficiency is low. This is a weapon of last chance.

Full-size pistol, army. A striking example of Colt 1911. Huge. Not every hand can reach. Heavy