What kind of equipment has the modern military industrial complex already donated to the Russian army?

41
What kind of equipment has the modern military industrial complex already donated to the Russian army?


Perhaps, the military-industrial complex of Russia has recently been one of the most dynamically developing sectors of the country. In past materials we already told about some promising developments in this area. However, any innovations, even if reaching the final straight, but still not launched into the series, leave the spiteful vents for criticism of the Russian defense industry - they say, all this is nothing more than interesting projects, but in fact the army still uses the technique that was born in Soviet Union. And it’s not the friendliest foreign policy situation that sometimes makes us wonder if our country has any time before the adoption of modern models for service. Do not have to let outdated models go into battle, should a conflict occur in the near future? That is why this time we will talk about equipment that meets the requirements of today, already entering the Russian armed forces.

Military shipping

Fighting is not just about gunfights, air raids and armored vehicles collisions. This is a whole complex of measures, one of which is the prompt transfer of troops to the desired point. For this purpose, use the military transport Aviation. For a long time, this task was performed by IL-76 aircraft, manufactured since the 70s of the last century. They managed to best prove themselves in business not only as part of our army, but also in the armed forces of other countries of the post-Soviet space, as well as Algeria, India, Iran, Iraq, Libya, Syria, China and other states.

Nevertheless constructively IL-76 can hardly be called a modern aircraft. But the main problem is not even that. As it often happened with military equipment of the times of the USSR, with the collapse of the Union, the production of 76's remained outside of Russia - in this case in Uzbekistan. In the 2005 year, for example, this nuance did not allow us to fulfill the obligation to manufacture and supply 38 aircraft data to China. At the same time, the Russian leadership was concerned with organizing the assembly of an upgraded version of the Il-76 on its own territory, and from 2006, the Aviastar-SP Ulyanovsk plant took up this task.

At the same time, the transfer of production was out of the question, we made a new aircraft based on the drawings used in Tashkent at the early stages of producing the IL-76, and on the existing sample of the aircraft delivered specifically for various measurements. “It was not without curious moments,” recalls the deputy head of the project, Sergey Bondarenko. - Antenna radar, located under the cockpit, and its fairing were made in accordance with the dimensions that we copied from the classic "Elah". But as soon as the test flights began, it turned out that the locator in motion “shakes” about the fairing and gradually wipes it. Why the old aircraft did not have such a problem, it was never possible to find out, but the St. Petersburg company Kotlin-Novator, which created avionics for the new modification, was given the task to slightly raise the heel of the locator. Additional time was required for completion and subsequent certification actions, but we solved the problem. ”

It is not surprising that as a result, the new aircraft, called IL-76MD-90А, resembled its Tashkent ancestor rather only outwardly. The transport worker was thoroughly reworked. Due to the use of one-piece long panels, it was possible to create wings without a joint in the middle, which not only increased their service life, but also, in combination with new engines and a reinforced chassis, increased the capacity of the vehicle. The maximum take-off weight increased by 20 tons - to 210, and the possible payload began to reach 60 tons against 48 in IL-76.

New engines on 12 percent more economical than the previous ones, which provides a significant increase in flight range without refueling (from 4000 to 5000 kilometers with a load of 52 tons). And the length of the takeoff of the Ulyanovsk aircraft with the maximum take-off mass on the contrary was reduced by 150 meters.

Analog flight-navigation system, automatic control system and instruments in the cockpit are completely replaced by digital ones. There is a satellite system.

This year, Aviastar has already launched two aircraft as part of the order of the Ministry of Defense, the third in line. In 2016, production capacity promises to bring aircraft to 6 a year, and in 2018, to 18 units annually. In total, under the terms of the state order, troops will receive 39 of such aircraft. In addition, based on the IL-76MD-90A, a new air tanker is being developed, as well as a spy plane "Premier".

The closest foreign analogue of the Ulyanovsk aircraft is the American C-17. Globemaster III, which started production in 1991, and will officially end in 2015. Over the years, two and a half hundred of these aircraft, which can be found in the armies of the United States, Australia, Canada, India, Great Britain and other countries, rolled off the assembly line.

By their capabilities, the devices are very similar. The American has a greater payload - the maximum payload of the order of 78 tons. However, the standard load in 56 tons is comparable to ours - 52 tons. At the same time, despite the large payload, the C-17 is slightly inferior to the Ulyanovsk "Ilu" in terms of the infantry capacity: the paratrooper 102 versus the 126 soldier or the 144 soldier vs 145 (and when the second deck is installed, 225!), Respectively. When using airplanes as mobile hospitals, a little more affected people will also fit in our device.

But the main advantage of the Russian aircraft is unpretentiousness. Landing on the ice or the ground without preparation, in the absence of ground navigation, and in difficult climatic conditions - the task feasible for Ulyanovsk, but inaccessible to delicate foreign samples.

Elements in the service

Descending from heaven to earth, it is worth telling about new multiple launch rocket systems - the main fire support of the motorized rifle troops. Our country has always been famous for its MLRS, which cost only Katyusha. However, over time, we began to lose leadership in this segment, and the Grad systems produced from 1960 to 1988 remained the best equipment in service with the Russian army. Eliminate the growing gap and take their baton called MLRS "Tornado".

Tornado was ready in 2012 year, but then Defense Minister Anatoly Serdyukov closed the project, considering them to be outdated and not too seriously modernized versions of Grad. In the Army, this decision was taken with surprise. The Grads and Hurricanes, which were in service with weapons, hardly met modern requirements, and large-caliber Smerches could not be used at the battalion-brigade level.

To call the “Tornado” systems, nevertheless adopted by 2014, the “slightly modernized versions” of the previous MLRS, the language does not turn. Intended to destroy open and sheltered manpower, armored vehicles, artillery and mortar batteries and command posts of a potential enemy, the installations have a modular structure and are available in three versions: Tornado-G for Grad 122-mm caliber shells, Tornado In "under the caliber of" Hurricane "in 220 millimeters and" Tornado-S "under the largest 300-millimeter shells, which shoots the" Smerch. " The modules required for a specific task are placed on a unified chassis, which greatly facilitates the maintenance of the systems (formerly there were separate chassis for Smerches and Hurricanes, and there were already three of them under Grads).

The analog and mechanical sighting systems of the previous MLRS in the Tornado are replaced by digital ones, which facilitates the exchange of information between the commander and the calculation of the launcher. The on-board computer allows you to fire without prior to the geodetic binding of the machine, hovering directly from the cab. The crew of the MLRS was reduced to two people.

But more interesting are the changes in the striking ability. According to the developers themselves, Tornado-G surpasses the Grad in efficiency by 15. It was possible to achieve such impressive results by working on projectiles: they began to use composite fuel instead of fuel sticks. Due to this, it was possible to increase the firing range in 2,5, from 40 kilometers to 90-100. The shells themselves, the shell of which is a high-strength thin-walled tube, have become cheaper and easier to manufacture.

The time taken for the next volley has been significantly reduced: from seven to three minutes. Ammunition is enough for three volleys. As for each of them, the Tornado-G launches 40 missiles in 38 seconds, and preparation for firing a machine that has taken a position takes one minute. In this case, the released package of ammunition can cover an area of ​​840 000 square meters against 40 000, which previously could hit "Grad".

And in order not to be hit by himself, the Tornado manages to retire to 4-5 kilometers from the moment of the shot until the last shell hits the target. The car can move at a speed of 60 kilometers per hour and travel 650 kilometers at a single station.

The main competitor of the "Tornado" abroad is 227-millimeter MLRS HIMARS from USA. Supporters of Serdyukov’s decision to close the Tornado project explained their position by its presence. In their opinion, domestic development was inferior to American in two main parameters. First, she used half the caliber. And secondly, it had an insufficient range of fire - HIMARS, using ATACMS series ammunition, is capable of hitting the target at a distance of 270 kilometers, which is more than twice the maximum distance of the Tornado shot.

However, skeptics do not take into account two important points. Firstly, the Tornado-G is inferior to the American counterpart in caliber, while the Tornado-U is comparable with it, and the Tornado-S surpasses it altogether. Secondly, the shorter range only makes the Russian MLRS not so universal that it is easily compensated by working in a parka with the same Iskanders that the American HIMARS do well with this indicator.

If we consider the MLRS in terms of the tasks for which they were thinking, that is, shelling a large area, then the reload time is extremely important. And it is here that the Russian system triumphs - the installation from the United States requires a seven-minute break between volleys, and during this time the Tornado will have time to shoot three times and leave for a considerable distance.
41 comment
Information
Dear reader, to leave comments on the publication, you must sign in.
  1. +6
    12 July 2015 06: 17
    Yeah, if there would be even more of these gifts, but for now these are "flowers, not gifts."
    1. +12
      12 July 2015 09: 11
      The article describes the transporter and the multiple launch rocket system. Not much at all somehow. Could have added corvettes here, Boreas, Ash, Ka-52, Mi-28n, SU-35, this is the first thing that came to mind.
      1. +5
        12 July 2015 10: 57
        Quote: р_у_с_с_к_и_й
        The article describes the transporter and the multiple launch rocket system.

        Indeed, a strange review. request
        1. +2
          12 July 2015 12: 14
          Yes, it obviously doesn’t “pull” the "completeness".
        2. The comment was deleted.
        3. +3
          12 July 2015 13: 38
          judging by the headline as in a proverb - swing for the ruble, a blow for a penny ..
          1. +1
            12 July 2015 20: 07
            Quote: sub307
            Yes, it obviously doesn’t “pull” the "completeness".

            for completeness lol ...

            Quote: igorka357
            New equipment only on the "armata" platform

            At the Saratov Aggregate Plant, they began to create a heavy anti-tank missile system, which in the future will replace the Chrysanthemum-S complex (pictured). The new development will be implemented on a unified tracked platform "Armata", Director General of the plant Igor Ivanov said today at a meeting of the regional government.

            info from: http: //tass.ru/ural-news/1144051
    2. The comment was deleted.
    3. -1
      14 July 2015 14: 37
      one hell all due to the Soviet scientific and technical reserve
      1. -1
        17 July 2015 10: 58
        Level 70s. Stone age count
        1. 0
          17 July 2015 11: 36
          Thanks for the rating, but we are somehow without American or Israeli tanks that are manually charged by blacks. And without Ukrainian T-64 wink
  2. +5
    12 July 2015 06: 37
    New equipment only on the platform "Armata", "Kurganets", T-14, ACS "Coalition", "Boomerang"! From the Air Force only PAK FA T-50! Strategic Rocket Forces "Yars"! Everything else is deep modernization, you are still AK of the hundredth series new name!
  3. +10
    12 July 2015 06: 46
    The topic of the article is not disclosed. Why write on the run about anything? ...
  4. dFG
    +5
    12 July 2015 07: 12
    the article is not even half-hearted, so the author chose three four samples, it’s not even clear on the basis of what he chose, there’s nothing but a heading ..... why not cover the Platform O project, walk around the EW or guided missile weapons samples?
  5. +13
    12 July 2015 08: 08
    . A satellite system has appeared.

    Satellite system of what? Communication, navigation?

    According to the developers themselves, Tornado-G surpasses Grad in efficiency by 15 times

    What is it like? Will 15 Grad batteries work now with one Tornado-G battery?
    1. +2
      12 July 2015 11: 36
      And in the arsenal of a single launcher Tornado U and Tornado C did not accept - still experimental non-serial samples.
      1. +3
        12 July 2015 12: 34
        What equipment has the modern military-industrial complex already presented


        I would have given them to upgrade the BMP-1.2.3 by installing a unified combat module B05Я01 (BM) weighing 3 tons ...

        TTX BM: 2A42 automatic cannon, placement of two Kornet-E ATGM launchers on the sides of the turret, each for two missiles ready for launch, with independent electromechanical vertical guidance drives.
        installation of a combined gunner’s sight with an independent stabilization system for the line of sight, including optical, thermal imaging and laser rangefinder channels, as well as a guided missile guidance channel.
        installation of a digital on-board computer with a sensor system.
        tele-teplovizovny automatic tracking machine.
        30-mm grenade launcher with independent VN drive and power magazine on the 300 grenade.
        panoramic sight of the commander with an independent system of stabilization of the line of sight, including television and laser rangefinder channels.
        high precision digital weapon stabilizer.

        Upgraded BMP-1 with BM B05Я01


        Upgraded BMP-2 with BM B05Я01


        Upgraded BMP-3 with BM B05Я01
        1. +2
          12 July 2015 14: 40
          so no thanks .. Better change it to "Kurgan", or even to T-15
          1. +2
            12 July 2015 17: 51
            Quote: tchoni
            so no thanks .. Better change it to "Kurgan", or even to T-15

            "Kurganets" Eugene in the troops, I think we will see no earlier than 17-18 years ... and this is an optimistic forecast ... and the T-15 ....
            1. +1
              13 July 2015 10: 31
              And there are already enough coffins numbered 1, 2 and 3 .... They only need a high-quality overhaul repair, and not attach a number of ATGMs on top of the tower, loudly calling all this "modernization"
              1. +2
                13 July 2015 13: 11
                Quote: tchoni
                behind the number 1, 2 and 3 there is enough.


                You understand very well that this is on ... no one needs it ... the main thing is I drank a boble ..... there’s no modernization of the BMP-1,2 ...

                BMP-2 M, not a bad upgrade ... but in the troops of such ZZZ ...
                1. 0
                  14 July 2015 09: 43
                  BMP-2 in general, the car is not bad, when everything works in it ....
                  But, the chassis is not adapted for a little extra load ... the cross-country ability and survivability of the chassis in case of overload suffer thoroughly ...
    2. 0
      13 July 2015 22: 25
      Quote: professor
      Satellite system of what? Communication, navigation?


      MARITIME SPACE SYSTEM FOR RECONNAISSANCE AND TARGETING “LIANA”
      "Lotus-S" 14Ф138, "Lotus-S" 14Ф145 and "Peony-NKS" 14Ф139
      this year another "Pion-NKS
      and another 2ea "Lotus" probably
      The Arsenal machine-building plant has begun production of new spacecraft of the Liana series, the company says in its quarterly report for 2014, the report is dated 15.02.15.


      a satellite reconnaissance system under the code “Watercolor”, nearing the finish line
      -----------------

      six radar reconnaissance spacecraft (SC) are supported (2 - 11Ф688 and 4 - 17Ф688), six Tselina radio reconnaissance spacecraft and about three dozen Araks photo-reconnaissance and optoelectronic reconnaissance spacecraft



      Quote: professor
      What is it like? Will 15 Grad batteries work now with one Tornado-G battery?


      Warhead weight 25 kg, against 18,4, increase 35%
      Range 37 km against 21, an increase of 76%. They write that the improved 9М521, already flies on 100km
      NURA body, which has a container 10 times lighter than that of the "Grad"
      Car crew reduced from 3 to 2 people, improvement by 33%
      Deployment time on an unprepared combat position is reduced to 6 minutes, and on prepared to 1 minutes, an improvement of 500%
      ACS and LMS, I don’t know how much% to add
      So with "the world on a string" probably came out 15 times
  6. +1
    12 July 2015 09: 06
    "interesting" publication, especially against the background of the Minsk tractor.
  7. +3
    12 July 2015 09: 36
    To avoid PR, the title should be replaced with "What technique Soviet Has the military-industrial complex already presented it to the Russian army? "
  8. 0
    12 July 2015 10: 03
    Serdyukov and here managed to spoil.
  9. +4
    12 July 2015 11: 31
    Largely due to this, it was possible to increase the firing range in 2,5 times - from 40 kilometers to 90-100

    This is when the BM-21 fired at 40 km?
    1. +2
      13 July 2015 00: 55
      Quote: pin313
      Largely due to this, it was possible to increase the firing range in 2,5 times - from 40 kilometers to 90-100

      This is when the BM-21 fired at 40 km?

      The author of the article has a hangover in his head ....... request what tongue
    2. gjv
      +1
      13 July 2015 10: 30
      Quote: pin313
      This is when the BM-21 fired at 40 km?

      Read carefully not from a hangover... The article says about the 1998 "Tornado-G" with 9M521 ammunition.
    3. The comment was deleted.
  10. 52
    +4
    12 July 2015 12: 29
    Honestly, a crap article! Deserved minus! Just an article about two copies, and even with a "crooked" presentation of the factual material!
    1. +3
      12 July 2015 12: 59
      The amateur sprinkled the article, the numbers were sucked from the unwashed finger.
      1. +3
        12 July 2015 13: 16
        And in order not to be hit by himself, the Tornado manages to retire 4-5 kilometers from the moment of the shot until the last shell reaches its target. Is this formula1 or the shell flies so slowly?
    2. +1
      13 July 2015 00: 57
      Quote: 52gim
      Honestly, a crap article! Deserved minus! Just an article about two copies, and even with a "crooked" presentation of the factual material!

      A very correct assessment of the article ... No. recourse
  11. +8
    12 July 2015 13: 07
    And again, this unbearable Serdyukov ... wassat
    No one will tell me how many days ago he was removed from the post of Minister of Defense?

    In general, the article is complete nonsense. At least in relation to MLRS.
    1. +1
      12 July 2015 18: 01
      Quote: Spade
      In general, the article is complete nonsense. At least in relation to MLRS.

      with us, with planning for the purchase and development of new types of weapons-BRED ...

      NO, PLANNED ECONOMY, and without it, even the Americans now do not work ...

      and in Russia there is a lack of an analogue of the organization "DARPA"
      DARPA - US Defense Agency for Advanced Research
      developments. The main objective of DARPA is to keep the state of defense equipment at the forefront
      so that in the event of an attack, the United States is "on the crest of technology." DARPA's founding
      1958 was in response to the launch of the first artificial Earth satellite from the USSR. With the filing of ARPA
      (old name DARPA) the Internet appeared, which was developed as a local military network for communications. At the moment, as you know, DARPA sponsors the development of robot cars and
      carries out short-term but interesting projects, mainly of a military nature.

      http://www.darpa.mil/news

      need breakthrough technology .....
      1. The comment was deleted.
      2. +3
        12 July 2015 19: 37
        Lopatovhow do you like this info ...

        translation from chinese lol published June 19 2015 of the year by Jeffrey Lin ...
        The new 125mm gun technician demonstrator received state and high profile to send away, complete with a large complement of staff floor, speeches by representatives of CNU officials and interested onlookers. The cartridge shell on the left side of the table is more than 1 meters in length.


        the Chinese made a tank gun 120 mm / 125 mm for a unitary shot, for a new MBT ... long barrel 60 calibres ... BOPS has an initial speed of 2000 m / s ...

        клик
        1. +1
          12 July 2015 19: 39
          and another photo, closer ...

          клик
          1. 0
            12 July 2015 19: 43
            and more ... like a metal sleeve, for 125 mm unitary shot ... in the foreground ...

            клик
            1. 0
              12 July 2015 20: 48
              interesting info with the theme ... new tank ammunition for GAZ40

              Americans and Jews and Germans are using a variety of OF now - with a reinforced front part made by the method of surfacing metal drops. This results in a projectile with good concrete impact and strong fragmentation, especially in the front. The fuse is a programmable bottom fuse that can undermine a projectile above a trench or when flying over a wall. Also works great on LMWs while tearing inside a car. In a word, a truly universal shell. But the shell is quite expensive and technologically sophisticated. Not for Russian industry


              info from: http: //www.dtic.mil/ndia/2012armaments/Tuesday14105ewert.pdf
              c: http: //www.docstoc.com/docs/28826040/Tank-Ammunition
              1. wk
                +1
                13 July 2015 02: 49
                Quote: cosmos111
                In a word, a truly universal shell. But the shell is quite expensive and technologically sophisticated. Not for Russian industry

                the absence of a unitary projectile is the main miscalculation of the Soviet MBT designers ... and a very dangerous miscalculation ... if not deliberate sabotage, given the extreme danger of a cap charge .... and if you also look at tank biathlon, with what "accuracy" the T72 guns shoot ... .imagine what will be the massacre God forbid ours to confront the NATO tanks.
                1. +2
                  13 July 2015 13: 16
                  Quote: wk
                  tank biathlon, with what "accuracy" the t72 guns shoot


                  the best calculations of RA ... from the spot, but how will they shoot in motion ???
                  1. wk
                    +1
                    13 July 2015 23: 40
                    Quote: cosmos111
                    But how will they shoot in motion ???

                    on the "internal" TB, such an exercise was .... also very sad .... in general, our tank guns are the Stone Age ... any weapon is deformed with each shot and every next projectile has deviations .... on NATO tanks there are devices that measure these errors and introduce them into the correction for the aiming device ... we do NOT have them! ... but is that the only thing? ... eh!
                    1. wk
                      +1
                      14 July 2015 00: 00
                      I wonder who put the minus now, understood what was said .... or does he only understand .... doesn’t have any tax in the world? .... Kiselev’s victim!
                    2. The comment was deleted.
                  2. The comment was deleted.
              2. The comment was deleted.
  12. +1
    12 July 2015 14: 13
    Yes, the article was not impressive - very short
  13. +1
    12 July 2015 16: 08
    The author slightly confused this "Grad", shot for 40s at 21,5 km, and "Tornado-g" shoots for 40 km, I think the same (I do not know), again, the time of loading by whom or what? under TPM
  14. +2
    12 July 2015 18: 23
    The article, of course, does not attract a full review. In principle, only 2 samples are described. Further, it is not indicated for what period. For the last year (2015), for the last 5 years. I tend to believe that for 2015, the article has one clue. Then yes, you can probably agree (if we are talking about large products)

    Quote: igorka357
    New equipment only on the platform "Armata", "Kurganets", T-14, ACS "Coalition", "Boomerang"! From the Air Force only PAK FA T-50! Strategic Rocket Forces "Yars"! Everything else is deep modernization, you are still AK of the hundredth series new name!

    Armata platform and its variants, Coalition, T-50 - these samples are not yet in series. "Yars" has been supplied to the troops for several years. This, as I understand it, is about serial products for the last year (2015)

    Quote: dfg
    the article is not even half-hearted, so the author chose three four samples, it’s not even clear on the basis of what he chose, there’s nothing but a heading ..... why not cover the Platform O project, walk around the EW or guided missile weapons samples?

    "Platform-O" is not yet in the series. For electronic warfare - yes, probably it could be covered. The article, of course, does not pull the review
  15. +1
    12 July 2015 20: 32
    The article is weird. The author did not notice such an "elephant" as the nuclear submarine "Vladimir Monomakh". The Russian defense industry made the boat, but not aliens presented it.
    1. +2
      12 July 2015 20: 49
      Tornado G:

  16. +2
    13 July 2015 01: 04
    It is much easier and faster to find information on the Internet (moreover, very complete, detailed) about the Chinese "analogues" of the "Tornado" than about the "Tornado" system itself request
  17. +1
    13 July 2015 09: 10
    It follows from the title of the article that sincerely generous people gathered under the auspices of the defense industry complex, were distracted from their direct duties and acquired gifts for our army wherever they could at their own expense.
  18. -2
    17 July 2015 10: 56
    Tales for quilted jackets. Raska is dying, everyone is running, money is being taken out of the country, and fairy tales about technology tell them cattle
  19. 0
    3 August 2015 09: 04
    Terpene
    Quote: Vladimir.
    "flowers, not gifts".

    Patience Dear .. We harness for a long time and then drive fast. In this hurry is harmful.