Our weapons are back in Iraq

26
Our weapons are back in Iraq


In June of this year, in the Iraqi port of Umm-Qasr, another batch of three Solntsepek TOR-1A flame-throwing systems delivered from Russia was unloaded from a transport vessel. It is powerful weapon production of Uralvagonzavod Research and Production Corporation was commissioned by Iraq as part of a large contract for the purchase of a land weapon in Russia worth 2013 billion dollars in 1,6. The current Solntsepek party is already the third in a row - together with a significant amount of other the weapons supplied in recent years makes it possible to speak of the full restoration of military-technical cooperation (MTC) of the two countries. After more than a 20-year break.

The first batches of weapons from the USSR came to this Middle Eastern country as early as 1958, immediately after the 14 revolution of July, as a result of which the monarchy was overthrown, a republic was proclaimed, and the British military bases were withdrawn from the country. The golden period of the Soviet-Iraqi military-technical cooperation came during the rule of Saddam Hussein, who came to power in Iraq in 1979 year. Unlike many of the so-called partners of the USSR, who received the mountains of Soviet weapons for free or on loans that no one was going to give, Iraq paid for deliveries in cash and easily convertible money into oil. Soon after coming to power, Saddam nationalized the country's main wealth — oil fields and the corresponding oil industry. The state acquired financial resources that allowed it to create with the help of Soviet supplies one of the strongest armies in the region.

The total value of contracts for the supply of arms from the USSR between 1958 and 1990 amounted to $ 30,5 billion at current prices, of which, before the invasion of Kuwait, Iraq managed to pay $ 22,413 billion ($ 8,152 billion in oil). In addition to the direct supply of equipment, the USSR trained Iraqi officers and specialists, Soviet enterprises carried out repairs of the supplied special equipment. An important component of the bilateral military-technical cooperation was the construction of facilities for the Iraqi military industry with the help of Soviet specialists. In the city of El Iskandariya, factories were built for the production of artillery ammunition, pyroxylin powder, rocket fuel, aviation ammunition and bombs. The USSR sold and transferred more than 60 licenses to Baghdad for the independent production of weapons, ammunition and military equipment, including Kalashnikov assault rifles, which quickly filled the entire Middle East. A huge amount of supplied Soviet weapons was enough for Iraq and for the Arab-Israeli wars, and for suppressing the Kurdish resistance, and for the exhausting Iran-Iraq war.

The large-scale and mutually beneficial military-technical cooperation between the two countries was violated by the Kuwaiti adventure of Saddam Hussein.

In response to the Iraqi aggression in early August 1990, the UN Security Council adopted Resolution No. 661, according to which, among other things, all states should have banned the transfer of weapons and military equipment to Iraq. For more than a decade, Iraq has left the list of significant players in the arms market. It was only after the overthrow of Saddam Hussein and the adoption of resolution No. 2003 of the UN Security Council on the lifting of international sanctions from Iraq and the resolution of 1483 on the creation of Iraqi security forces in Russia in 2004 and Russia had the legal opportunity to return to the Iraqi market.

AFTER A LONG BREAK

However, the conditions in the country - political, economic - have changed dramatically. The country was de facto under American occupation, and the political and military leadership was under the control of the United States, which was in no hurry to return the Russians to the Iraqi arms market. Destroyed by a decade of sanctions and a US invasion, the country could no longer spend tens of billions of dollars on weapons in Saddam. In addition, the New Army of Iraq’s forces were initially extremely limited in number (35 thousand). Therefore, the rapid return of Russia to the Iraqi market soon after the overthrow of Saddam Hussein and the lifting of the sanctions did not happen.

The situation began to change at the end of 2011, when the last American soldiers left Iraq and the nine-year occupation of the country ended. On the one hand, the Iraqi leadership gained some freedom of action regarding the choice of partners for military-technical cooperation, managed to recover after the lifting of sanctions and the oil industry - the main source of revenue for military procurement. On the other hand, the numerous Iraqi insurgent groups, which gained strength after the overthrow of Saddam Hussein, now concentrated their armed struggle against the central Iraqi government. With new force broke out the conflict between various religious and ethnic groups. Therefore, the Iraqi leadership began to look for a reliable source of modern weapons to counter the threats to which the country remained.


Installations TOC-1A "Sunlight" pass through the streets of Baghdad. Reutes Photo


And in the 2012 year, following several visits to Russia by an Iraqi delegation led by Acting Iraqi Defense Minister Saadun Duleimi and a meeting of Russian and Iraqi Prime Ministers Dmitry Medvedev and Nuri al-Maliki, several contracts were signed for the supply of weapons and military weapons to Iraq. equipment worth about 4,2 billion dollars. The package included the delivery of 48 anti-aircraft missile-gun systems "Armor-C1" and 36 (later - to 40) attack helicopters Mi-28НЭ.

The Americans decided not to put up with the loss of the Iraqi market share and launched an information campaign to discredit the Russian-Iraqi military-technical cooperation. Allegedly, the transactions were concluded with obvious corruption violations and require verification. However, after the trial, the adviser to the Iraqi Prime Minister Ali al-Mousawi said that the deal was given the green light. An advance payment was made for the supplied weapons, in addition, in April 2013, an additional contract was concluded for the delivery of six Mi-35М helicopters to Iraq. In November 2013, Iraq received the first four helicopters manufactured by Rostvertol. In 2014, Russian military helicopters Mi-28HE were delivered to Iraq.

FRIENDSHIP VERIFIED IN BAD

By this time, the Iraqi state was faced with a new, much larger threat: in January 2014, the international terrorist organization Islamic State (IG) launched a large-scale offensive in Iraq. 1 January 2014, IG militants attacked the city of Mosul, 2 January they captured Ramadi, 4 January, Iraqi troops left the city Fallujah. The offensive was accompanied by a series of large-scale terrorist attacks in Baghdad and other major cities of the country. Great efforts by the government forces managed to stabilize the situation and repel a number of settlements. However, in June 2014, a new large-scale IS attack began in northern Iraq. Over 1300, armed militants seized military facilities and Mosul International Airport. Fearing the massacre, up to half a million of its inhabitants fled from the city. 11 June IG militants seized the city of Tikrit - an important point on the way to Baghdad. There was a threat of seizure of the capital of Iraq.

In these difficult conditions, the United States struck the back of the Iraqi government. The US government has delayed the shipment to Iraq of a batch of F-16IQ fighters purchased by Iraqis as part of the 12-billion package of contracts for the supply of American weapons to Iraq. The delivery was postponed indefinitely with the rather cynical in the current situation wording “until the security situation [in Iraq] improves.” Together with the F-16IQ, the Iraqis were to receive guided bombs and other weapons that could help stop the IS.

In the face of the actual refusal of the United States to supply the necessary weapons to Baghdad, the Iraqi government turned for urgent help to its long-time and trusted partner in military-technical cooperation - Russia. Already 28 of June, a few days after the appeal, the first five attack aircraft Su-25 were delivered to Iraq. They were delivered from a strategic reserve of the Ministry of Defense of the Russian Federation.

Artillery systems followed the attack aircraft. 28 July 2014, the first three heavy jet-flame-throwing systems TOC-1A "Solntsepek" were delivered to Baghdad by the An-124-100 "Ruslan" aircraft of the Volga-Dnepr Airlines. The resulting technology was soon sent into battle and helped to contain the onset of the IG. Thus, Russia not only managed to return to the arms market of Iraq after the 20-year break, but also helped the Iraqi authorities to keep the country from being captured by Islamists.

There was a significant contrast in which Russian diplomats and arms exporters played. On the one hand, the Americans, who were considered allies of the new Iraqi authorities, but refused to supply the F-16IQs to the Iraqis at the key moment, on the other hand, Russia, which promptly responded to the request of the Iraqi government.

PENTAGON EXPRESSLY CRUSHED

Meanwhile, relations between Iraq and the United States continued to deteriorate. F-16IQ fighters, whose delivery was scheduled for September 2014, have not yet been delivered. The next named delivery time is the second half of 2015 of the year. Moreover, a number of reports have appeared in Iraqi media referring to sources in the country's intelligence circles that the United States is supplying arms to their enemy, the IS militants. Evidence is given of the fact that military cargoes have been dropped on the territory controlled by the militants, numerous photo and video evidence of the presence of American weapons among the IG fighters, and evidence of individuals about the participation of the American military in the training of militants. With all the controversial and conspiracy the version of the American support of the IG, it enjoys considerable popularity among the part of the Iraqi establishment. There is no added understanding between the United States and Iraq of the facts of direct US support for Kurdish formations in Iraq’s territory, which are in opposition to the country's central government. Against this background, a picks between American and Iraqi officials, which took place after the IS capture of the settlement of Ramadi in May of this year, is indicative. Commenting on this event on CNN, the head of the Pentagon Ashton Carter accused Iraqi troops of lack of fighting spirit: "We question the desire of the Iraqi authorities to resist the IG and defend themselves."

In response, Prime Minister Haider Al-Abadi said that the head of the Pentagon "used inaccurate information about the strength and capabilities of the Iraqi army in the battles against the IS." Iraqi Interior Minister Mohammed Salem al-Qabban said on the RT television channel that the Iraqi authorities are hoping for help from Russia in their struggle against the Islamists. All this creates an additional window for Russia and Russian arms manufacturers for the delivery of Russian military products to Iraq. There is a situation of mutually beneficial and financial-military-political cooperation that is not so often found on the arms market. By supporting the secular government of Iraq, Russia rescues its long-time partner from destruction under the blows of the Islamists, thereby strengthening its military and political influence in the region.
26 comments
Information
Dear reader, to leave comments on the publication, you must sign in.
  1. +17
    5 July 2015 07: 28
    now we do not deliver but sell-hosh; buy not hosh as hosh; I don’t see anything criminal, ordinary trade, we also rearm the army, so we need money and in general the military-industrial complex pays off on such contracts; Well, unless of course some Medvedev will not put sticks in the wheels of Rogozin
  2. or
    +8
    5 July 2015 07: 42
    And again Russia is raking out the post-American "Augean Stables". Well, where are they all without us? Friends are known in "food"?
  3. +6
    5 July 2015 08: 21
    -Americans who were considered allies of the new Iraqi government, but refused at a key moment to supply Iraqis with F-16IQ.
    ISIS is taken care of.
    PS American AT-4 portable missile systems can penetrate 20 cm thick defense and hit targets at a distance of up to 500 meters, Russian Cornet systems can penetrate 30 cm defense and hit targets at a distance of up to 2300 meters.
    1. +13
      5 July 2015 08: 29
      Well AT-4 = RPG or Fly. Cornet is an anti-tank system, you should not compare them.


      By f-xnumx. Again postponed. An Iraqi general was killed who was engaged in acceptance on one of the Iraqi sides, the first two pairs were to be distilled in September. Now postponed indefinitely, not earlier than 16 of the year.
    2. 0
      7 July 2015 18: 08
      AT-4 - NOT a Swedish anti-tank grenade launcher. He originally
      Thought against lightly armored targets.
  4. +13
    5 July 2015 08: 23
    Personally, this situation frankly pleases me.
    Not that of course there is a war going on in Iraq, but the fact that the Americans themselves once again, without any intervention from us, are most effectively destroying the myths they themselves created about what kind of USA is a democratic, humane and philanthropic state.
    During the Soviet era and in the early 90s, the United States played very successfully on INTENTIONS, in which they were always just a model of the righteous, and beautiful tales about democracy, individual freedoms, and so on made Russia an evil empire (which they successfully used on the world stage) .But in the last 20 years (earlier this was also the case, but it was hushed up more successfully), continuing to declare INTENTIONS, the United States has become less and less concerned with "legend" of its ACTIONS. And actions began to give RESULTS from which the world's hair stood on end.
    And it turned out that the world as a whole was not ready to speak black and white, just because the US had said so. It turns out that there are still forces in the world trying to play by their own rules, but the USA somehow did not foresee this.
    Well, somehow it seemed to them - now the Union will collapse, and the whole world is at our feet. They dumped, weakened, didn’t finish, decided that even if they carry absolute nonsense and commit any meanness, then everyone will close their eyes ... they did not close.
    But the United States turned out to be unprepared for this, and continues to drive ahead, completely discrediting itself.
    By historical standards, a negligible time has passed, but it has already managed to show what the United States is.
    Even their most faithful lackeys no longer unconditionally follow in the wake of their "politics" in everything, people in these countries will not soon re-elect their puppets, and then the interesting will begin.
    And the most attractive to me personally in all of this is that the USA really has no one to blame for all its mistakes and mistakes, NOBODY interfered with, their NOBODY besides its greed did not draw into all these squabbles. Whoever they try to designate a scapegoat is their fault, and the whole world understands this, although not everyone is ready to say it out loud.
    1. +3
      5 July 2015 17: 54
      It is like an unexpectedly fallen wealth on an unprepared person. And on top of euphoria, such a one quickly spends all his money on pleasure and the feeling that the whole world is at your feet. As a result, after the allotted time, it turns out that he was looking in the wrong direction and was doing what was not needed. So is America. It seems that they were left alone, they got everything they wanted ... It seems that you could establish a peaceful life and gain authority. And the whole world would go around ... BUT! After all, the most powerful, the enemy is no more. And the bacchanalia began! a lot of ill-conceived steps, unnecessary wars, sacrifices, deceit and lies just to make sure everyone is how cool we are ... exceptional ...
      But only everyone was convinced of the opposite ... Liars, hypocrites, cynics, snobs and other epithets! One can object, say that people are different, this government is such ... But every nation deserves such a government that it deserves ... hi
      Personally, my attitude towards America is purely negative. request
  5. +7
    5 July 2015 08: 26
    Iraq, Iraq. At first, the mattress makers were "tricked", the IG was raised and fed, and now they "washed their hands." Get it out yourself if you can. So Iraq rushed after Russian weapons - the memory remained. And we don't mind - buy. You look, and you will beat IS.
    1. +7
      5 July 2015 12: 20
      Quote: Mountain Shooter
      Iraq, Iraq. At first, the mattress makers were "tricked", the IG was raised and fed, and now they "washed their hands."

      But wasn’t this the case with Yugoslavia or Afghanistan? After the bombing and sweeping, the Americans wash their hands without even trying to restore anything. And then Russia begins to clean up and restore what the hegemon has gouged.
      And the world does not learn anything and continues to look into the mouth of world leaders, in the hope that their life and security will become better.
  6. +3
    5 July 2015 08: 51
    Iraqis dragged a bunch of mattress weapons, left military depots, now all this is at ISIS. It’s a pity if the Solntsepeks will perish. Even if fully paid.
    1. +3
      5 July 2015 14: 39
      It is beneficial for Americans to spread rumors that the Iraqi army has profiled a bunch of weapons, and ISIS has captured all this. They, amers, need to somehow veil their military assistance to ISIS, so they * will publish about the seizure of warehouses ..
  7. +8
    5 July 2015 08: 52
    Americans "well done" trade on the right and on the left, in the sense of "both yours and ours." It's a good war for them. The war is far from their borders, instability in the world is growing, weapons are being sold with a bang, and the main thing is that the "Papuans" are wetting themselves with frenzy. One drawback, Russia does not want to get in there, but they want it so much that there is no urine.
    1. +3
      5 July 2015 13: 57
      General instability in the Middle East gives the United States the opportunity to influence the oil market. In this situation, one should not harbor illusions, firstly, the "deterioration" of US-Iraqi relations is when the OWNER punishes his dog (I mean, including the situation with F- 16); secondly, the amers simply do not want to spend money on re-equipping the Iraqi army, because this is not only the samples themselves, but also the infrastructure, retraining of personnel. It is easier and more expedient to give those few Iraqis who are ready to fight for the government, what they can use. The situation is the same in Afghanistan. Russia is simply allowed to slightly venerate the "Middle East pie", if it were not so, it would be a question of purchasing hundreds of units.
  8. +2
    5 July 2015 13: 33
    It would be interesting to know the opinion of the Iraqis themselves about the use of our weapons in battles, in fact it is partially faced with American means of destruction and defense
  9. +2
    5 July 2015 13: 39
    Trading is good, especially for cash and not on credit. The main thing is not to fit
    into the mess started by our "partners". Let them clean up their brew themselves.
  10. 0
    5 July 2015 13: 44
    ratfly SU Today, 08:51 AM New
    Iraqis dragged a bunch of mattress weapons, left military depots, now all this is at ISIS. It’s a pity if the Solntsepeks will perish. Even if fully paid.

    The main thing is not the installation, the main thing is the rockets, or rather the filling in them.
    1. +2
      5 July 2015 14: 23
      Do you think that we are supplying Solntsepek installations to Iraq without missiles? If ISIS captures (God forbid!) These installations, they are certainly not empty! The Iraqis will not risk their own skin, like ours in 1941, so as not to hand over the Katyushas to the Germans!
  11. +2
    5 July 2015 13: 57
    dojjdik (2) SU Today, 07:28 AM
    now we don’t supply but sell-hosh buy not hosh how hosh

    Trading is good, especially for cash and not for debt. The main thing is not to get into
    someone else's heap piled up by our "partners". Let them sort out the handiwork themselves,
    rather cf * to their own!
  12. +1
    5 July 2015 14: 12
    And Iraqis complain about the American Humvees. 1500 kilometers and the suspension can be thrown out.
  13. wanderer_032
    +1
    5 July 2015 14: 38
    Supporting the secular government of Iraq, Russia saves its long-standing partner from destruction under the blows of the Islamists, thereby strengthening its military and political influence in the region.

    The "secular" government of Iraq, in the majority - American puppets, who were put in these positions by the US occupation authorities. Who, after the departure of the amerikosov, were left alone with the local partisans and ISIS.
    So whose influence are we strengthening there and who are we supporting?

    It was necessary to write simply - we make money there by selling military equipment. Just a business and nothing personal. smile
    1. +1
      5 July 2015 15: 32
      Quote: wanderer_032
      It was necessary to write simply - we make money there by selling military equipment. Just a business and nothing personal.

      no, not really like that! Yes, business too, and there’s nothing wrong with that! all the more so Iraq is not dill, they have money and are settled immediately, upon delivery, without proceedings in international courts. wink
      It is very beneficial for us that ISIL fought in Iraq and in Syria and Iran, too, did not sit idly by. Otherwise, in the worst case scenario for us and Iran, the Islamic State invades the whole of Iraq, Syria. The fortified and wintering one will go to the Caucasus, which the Islamic State is already openly declaring. So what is more profitable for us so that both Iraq and Syria and the Kurds and Iran would slaughter these things from all that is possible, or do you still wait for them in the South Caucasus and the North Caucasus, eh? wassat
      hi
  14. +2
    5 July 2015 18: 36
    Quote: Semyonitch
    It is beneficial for Americans to spread rumors that the Iraqi army has profiled a bunch of weapons, and ISIS has captured all this. They, amers, need to somehow veil their military assistance to ISIS, so they * will publish about the seizure of warehouses ..

    And this was not only declared by the Americans, but also ours. And not only warehouses. in particular, ours reported that ISIL captured a large number of isotopes at a university ...

    Quote: senima56
    Do you think that we are supplying Solntsepek installations to Iraq without missiles? If ISIS captures (God forbid!) These installations, they are certainly not empty! The Iraqis will not risk their own skin, like ours in 1941, so as not to hand over the Katyushas to the Germans!

    And in such a situation, someone will also say that Russia supplies ISIS with weapons? laughing
  15. +1
    5 July 2015 19: 32
    They will drop everything and run away from the terrorists. These are the warriors. The weapon will be in the wrong hands. You yourself need to burn the ig, or their creators specifically set.
    1. Dam
      +1
      5 July 2015 22: 21
      They are normal warriors. Remember the Iran-Iraq war. They just do not see the point of fighting for traitors in power. All the loud surrender of arms depots took place not without orders from the venal headquarters, where from a mile away you could see mattress ears. Yes, gentlemen, moderators, why did the word Penguin in Serbian equate to a mat? Mattresses and they are
  16. +1
    6 July 2015 00: 35
    Americans buy oil from IS militants (through supply companies) for half the price (well, as if they were stolen), so why do they need to buy the same from the Iraqi government at world (market) prices (that's why the USA IG is sponsored, only business, nothing personal).
  17. +1
    6 July 2015 07: 57
    Mattresses bomb the IS, show it to the whole world. A sort of anti-terrorism advertisement. And when IS fighters captured the city of Ramadi in Iraq, the American pilots had a day off for a couple of days. Well, purely by accident.
  18. +1
    6 July 2015 17: 01
    Ooh, the new equipment for ISIS is coming, no matter how sad the Iraqi warriors are already, there’s no state or homeland.
  19. 0
    12 July 2015 19: 10
    And it’s interesting that we’ll throw off the old J-T-55 there like that, otherwise everything is new and why not very much.