Unusual tanks of Russia and the USSR. Tank TG 1931 g

9
In the USSR at the end of the 20s of the last century, tank building was not fully developed. The basis of the armored forces of the Red Army were machines made under license on the basis of imported light samples tanks. The leadership of the country, realizing the urgent need to produce their own domestic-made cars, made every effort to promote a wide variety of projects of Soviet engineers and designers. Every year, the UMM Red Army Commission examined dozens of projects, made decisions on the allocation of huge funds for their development. One of the important directions of domestic tank building was the creation of medium tanks capable of accompanying infantry both in a deep offensive and in breaking through fortified enemy defense lines. The lack of experience of Soviet engineers in creating this type of machine led to the failure of several such projects, and a decision was made to invite and engage foreign specialists in the creation of new models. So the German engineer Edward Grote was invited to the USSR. Having arrived in the Soviet Union in March 1930, E. Grote, together with a group of German technicians and engineers, already in April begins work on his new project for the medium maneuverable tank TG or Tank Grote.

Unusual tanks of Russia and the USSR. Tank TG 1931 g


The TG project was developed in a specially created design bureau ABO-5 of the Bolshevik plant. According to the idea of ​​E. Grote, according to the learned technical assignment, this should be a tank weighing no more than 18 tons, capable of traveling with a speed of at least 30 km per hour, highly maneuverable, well armed and protected by a katana with 20-35 mm anti-ballistic armor. In April 1931, a prototype machine was built and already in July was submitted for testing, which lasted more than two months. Having shown good speed results, 34 km per hour, high maneuverability and maneuverability, the Grote tank thanks to the reverse mechanism and a six-speed gearbox had the ability to move back and forth at the same speed. The shielded chassis of the machine consisted of five rubberized rollers of large diameter, equipped with an individual coil spring and a brake mechanism. Six support rollers, guide and rear (with drive wheel gear installed inside it) on board. Caterpillar tracks were made by hot stamping and had a high durability. In the stern of the armored hull was placed a V-shaped 12-cylinder aviation engine M-6 carburetor type with a capacity of 305 hp The armored hull of the car was completely welded, size: length 7,5 m, width 3,1 m, height 2,84 m, of rolled armored plates with an inclined installation, the armor was: forehead - 44 mm, side - 24 mm, feed - 20 mm.

The armament deployment scheme was three-tiered, the first tier of armament consisted of two 7,62-mm tank guns DT-29, installed in ball bearings and housed in the onboard body armor plates. The second tier included an 76,2-mm joint design P.N. Syachentov and E. Grote and three 7,62-mm machine guns of the Maxim system, also installed in ball bearings and housed in a tall underbog box. The third tier - one 37-mm PS-1 gun mounted in a rotating turret, which had a large angle of vertical guidance, which allowed firing at air targets.

To monitor the progress of the battle, a commander's cupola was installed on the roof of the rotating turret, equipped with a tank periscope.


1931 year. TG on trial

In general, the car had a favorable impression on the members of the commission; however, a number of significant shortcomings were identified, one of which was a small space, the close position of the crew made it impossible to simultaneously fire cannons and machine guns. It was noted poor cooling of the engine, which led to its rapid overheating. The unfortunate location of the gearbox and side clutches made it difficult to access these nodes for repairs in the event of a breakdown. October 4 1931 was ordered to thoroughly examine and study the “Grotto tank” in depth. After examining the car carefully, the commission concluded: "Tank Grote considered an experimental model." However, not only the technical shortcomings of the machine were the reason for the refusal to adopt it and launch into the series. Among other things, the complexity of the design in the production affected, which made the car very expensive, its cost exceeded 1 500 000 rubles. Soon all the work on the TG project was discontinued, engineer E. Grote began to develop new projects for the creation of TG-4 and TG-5 heavy tanks. However, the experience gained by Soviet engineers and designers who worked together with German colleagues, was later successfully applied in the following projects.
9 comments
Information
Dear reader, to leave comments on the publication, you must sign in.
  1. +2
    17 October 2011 09: 28


    Tests of the tank showed an equal number of both advantages and disadvantages. TG guns were distinguished by good accuracy of fire, and the 76-mm gun exceeded the power of all tank guns of that time. The control of the tank was extremely easy, and the course was smooth. At the same time, the Grote tank had poor patency on soft soils and too close a fighting compartment; it was difficult to repair the engine and gearbox.
    And the main obstacle to putting the tank into mass production was its huge cost (like the 25 BT-2 tanks)!
  2. 0
    17 October 2011 15: 19
    negative experience is also an experience!
  3. 0
    17 October 2011 17: 18
    Quote: Vadivak
    And the main obstacle to putting the tank into mass production was its huge cost (like the 25 BT-2 tanks)!

    But is the comparison legitimate, are the cars of the class hoo how different?
    1. 0
      18 October 2011 10: 47
      Given the then light tank fashion, this argument could be cited.
      1. 0
        18 October 2011 14: 05
        somehow out of place, because in addition to the "flying" and heavy T-35s were
        1. -1
          18 October 2011 14: 30
          So 35's of all 63 units were built, including prototypes. Even before BT-5 with its ~ 1800 pieces, whistle and whistle.
  4. 0
    18 October 2011 14: 40
    let's take "lighter", and KV?
    1. -1
      18 October 2011 14: 48
      There are more of these, but KV is already from those times when thousands of fast tanks in foreign territory somehow played enough and turned their attention to armor with weapons.
  5. SIA
    SIA
    +1
    18 October 2011 15: 13
    The caterpillars are narrow, and therefore patency on soft roads is useless. If the tracks were wider and with good lugs, this would reduce the specific load on the soil.