Machine of the future. Wait is not long

46
2011 year turned out to be rich in sensational or sometimes even scandalous news relative to the Russian Armed Forces. The reform is moving along the planned path, and not all its nuances are understandable to the narrow-minded masses. Yes, and scandalous news regularly receive official denial.

Another wave of disputes began in September. Then the Ministry of Defense stated that it no longer intends to purchase new copies of the AK-74 assault rifle. Immediately, the near-armed public was divided into two irreconcilable camps: some began to repeat that it was time to stop buying this “old” and start equipping troops with new weapons, especially since the new types are more than enough, while others began to appeal to the price, reliability and other "consumer characteristics" of the 74. There is, however, another group of people who reacted to this news as always: they demanded that the Defense Ministry be dispersed, they all were jailed and shot for reliability.

But these are emotions, and in the military, they cannot be trusted in any way. Let's try to figure out why the ministry decided to stop the purchase of AK-74, for what purpose it was done and what will be in the hands of our soldiers in a few years.

At the moment, AK-74 and its modifications are the main small arms of the Russian army. The total number of 74-x issued exceeds 5 million units, and the production of AK-74M and the "hundredth" line continues to this day.

However, a new army machine is needed. And the sooner the better. For this role, experts and amateurs nominate both Kovrov AEK-971 and Izhevsk AN-94. But economically and technologically more profitable will be the continuation of the Kalashnikov line.



In this case, you should pay attention to the AK-107 and AK-108 machines. Like AN-94 and AEK-971, they have balanced automation. Those. when firing recoil decreases, which has a positive effect on accuracy and accuracy. In 107 and Kalashnikovs 108, a system with two gas pistons is used: when one of them cocks the automatics when fired, the second moves in the opposite direction and compensates for the impulse of the first. A similar scheme has been applied in AEK-971, but the Kalashnikov has a simpler and less prone to clogging structure.

In 2009, Izhmash announced the start of work on the 200 series. These machines, according to the then general director of the enterprise V. Gorodetsky, will be the new fifth generation of the Kalashnikov family, and their characteristics will be half the fourth generation (the first generation - AK arr. 49 of the year, the second - AKM, the third - AK-74 and its modifications, the fourth - the "hundredth" series). It was originally planned to start the tests of AK-200 this year, but due to financial problems of the enterprise, the dates have shifted. Now, the Ministry of Defense issued "Izhmash" a new technical task. How far the two hundredth series in its current form satisfies it is unknown.



But we will try to analyze the foreign experience, the desire of "end users" and imagine what the new model of weapon will look like.

Dimensions. For mass production, the classical scheme is now the most advantageous: the store in front, the handle and the trigger - in the back. But in terms of convenience and size it is more profitable to build a bullpup. At the same time, the latter option has its drawbacks - a left-handed shooter can easily get a sleeve in the face.



Cartridge. In the coming years, revolutionary new ammunition is not expected. Yes, and warehouses, clogged finished cartridges, can not be forgotten. Most likely, the cartridge will remain the same - low-pulse 5,45x39 mm. So the dimensions of the store will also remain the same, and the capacity in 30 cartridges suits everyone.

Materials. Receiver with a lid, barrel and other "stuffing" will still remain metal, you can not even talk about it. But the butt, grip, shop and handguard will be plastic. This is not a tribute to fashion, but concern for the soldier and nature. The same wooden or metal parts weigh more. Perhaps plastic of new varieties, more durable and resistant to impact, will be used. But the massive use of such composite materials, of which it will be possible to make a receiver, will have to wait until the sixth or seventh generation.

Automation. The most promising is a system similar to the AK-107, with two pistons. The scheme is a bit more complicated than usual, but it has an excellent effect on accuracy - it improves up to two times. Hopefully, the soldiers of the future will not get confused, which piston to insert.

Sights. The classic "front sight - open sight" system is not going anywhere. There will also be a side plate for mounting the sight. But on the export versions of the machine is quite possible to install Picatinny rail or Weaver. Accordingly, on the machine you can install any sight, compatible with the seat. The machine gun is planned for mass production in the amount of hundreds of thousands of pieces, so you should not wait for the “native” collimator sight, as on the German G36 rifle. It is very expensive toy for mass weapons.

"Body kit." Of course, to be a device for mounting under-barrel grenade launcher. Perhaps even under the forearm will also be installed mounting strips. Moreover, this structural feature should be to the liking of the special forces: a “tactical” grip, a flashlight, or something else can be attached to a regular forearm. In the meantime, it is necessary either to install on a machine not a native forearm, or to reinvent eerie constructions from a machine gun, a lantern and scotch.

But these are only assumptions. How much they will be correct, we learn only in 2012 year. It was then that the new machine should be submitted to the state tests.

One can hope that Izhmash will cope in time, because the financial problems of the enterprise are slowly beginning to be solved. At the beginning of this month (October 2011), the debt restructuring of NPO Izhmash to Sberbank was announced.

The existing technical project and the intention to continue to create their own weapons add points to the image of Russia. Many developed foreign countries, for example, arm their armies with purchased weapons or make them under license. And the Russian defense industry not only provides its own army, but also works for export.
Patriotic shooting weapon assault rifles

46 comments
Information
Dear reader, to leave comments on the publication, you must sign in.
  1. ZEBRASH
    +1
    12 October 2011 07: 40
    Correctly abandoned the AK-74. I think it will be possible to sell half of the AK-74 from warehouses, and fill the empty space of the AK hundredth or two hundredth series fellow But the caliber will probably again be 5,45, as the author said sad I do not respect him No.
    1. artem9570
      -1
      24 October 2012 21: 25
      7.62 is most suitable. add balanced automation and better m16 will be less accurate
  2. Mr. Truth
    -1
    12 October 2011 08: 51
    The author shorten the pussy for himself, and do not touch the barrel and 5,45 and, 7,62 are optimized for 415 mm.
  3. Ion coaelung
    +5
    12 October 2011 10: 10
    AK hundredth series + bullpup scheme (to solve the issue of ejection of the sleeve, similar to the development of Korobov, where the sleeves fly forward). In my opinion, in the bullpup version, tasks like reducing the size and weight of weapons are well solved. You can attach something useful to the trunk not in terms of size and weight. Moreover, the canopy on the front will have a good effect on the center of gravity. The truth is significantly more expensive design. What is more important, profitability or ergonomics?
  4. Alexey Prikazchikov
    -15
    12 October 2011 11: 03
    Damn, didn’t we really forget how to make weapons, then you would have bought a license for the production of the same gun, and that the platform is multi-modular, and you have a carbine and rifle for a Marxman and a light machine gun, whatever you want to put on it, damn it, give me boh so that I’m not right at the expense of designers, at least once in their lives, do something worthwhile.
    1. +2
      12 October 2011 11: 25
      The present is AEK. Skar has many shortcomings just because of its multi-caliber. But the cartridge needs 7,62, AEK with this cartridge has the same accuracy as with 5,45. With 7,62 there would generally be a killer gun.
      1. Alexey Prikazchikov
        -1
        12 October 2011 17: 32
        At the expense of disadvantages for more details ???
        1. +1
          12 October 2011 19: 51
          At the expense of disadvantages for more details ???

          It’s more complicated than Abakan, so they don’t want to take it into service, the sample is already ready and tested - it can be launched in a series. This is me about kickbacks in defense mines and other bureaucrats ...
      2. +4
        12 October 2011 19: 45
        With 7,62 there would generally be a killer gun.


        971x5.45 AEK-39 assault rifle, early prototype

        Automatic AEK-973 caliber 7.62x39, an early experimental version

        971x5.45 AEK-39 assault rifle, early production version, with a collimator sight installed

        Automatic machine AEK-973C caliber 7.62x39, late version

        Caliber: 5.45x39mm (AEK-971), 5.56x45mm NATO (AEK-972) and 7.62x39 (AEK-973)
        Length: 965 mm
        Barrel length: 420 mm
        Weight: 3.3 kg without magazine
        TKMP firing: 800-900 rounds per minute
        Magazine: 30 rounds, standard from AKM and AK-74 acc. caliber
        1. kesa1111
          0
          22 October 2011 19: 47
          Does the AEK-973C with ergonomics be all right? (fire control handle).
  5. MKALEKSEY
    0
    12 October 2011 13: 19
    All wishes for a new machine gun in this article are a description of the Tula A-91 machine gun (IMHO, he only needs a little refinement in terms of guides and the location of the fire translator, well, balanced automatics will not hurt). - decrease the length of the store.
  6. 0
    12 October 2011 16: 55
    I am not a military man, but in my opinion, bullpup systems have one very significant drawback. The overall length of the weapon makes bayonet placement extremely ineffective. The "long" body lengthens a kind of "shaft" of the bayonet.

    In modern wars, there is little to go into bayonet attacks, but during assaults this device can be very valuable ...
    1. Mahamont
      -8
      12 October 2011 17: 16
      Bull-pal can be held in one hand. A knife or gun in another.
      1. ESCANDER
        +3
        12 October 2011 19: 28
        Mahamont

        A grenade - in the third ...
        Do you understand what you said?
        Have you tried it at least once?
        The bullpup is compact, good wherever you are in the tank, but for the infantry in close contact - sucks, the lever is small, "not the bayonet, not the club." 1 second is enough for me on the “AK bayonet-butt”, while you will deal with your own hands.
    2. Alexey Prikazchikov
      0
      12 October 2011 17: 33
      Not a damn thing, it’s invaluable to catch the main fire in an urban battle.
    3. +1
      12 October 2011 19: 09
      The overall length of the weapon makes bayonet placement extremely ineffective. The "long" body lengthens a kind of "shaft" of the bayonet.

      but during assaults, this device can be very valuable ...

      for the assault - a bayonet? during the assault, you don’t have to go that far or use another barrel, the same thunderstorm or bison ...
    4. +1
      12 October 2011 19: 25
      The British do not soar bullpups, there is a bayonet.
      1. valex
        0
        23 June 2012 15: 15
        You can't even talk about the English L-86 with an aluminum box! In addition, the "bullpup" has one drawback, about which for some reason they are silent: try to quickly change the store somewhere under the armpit, without moving the barrel away from the target direction
    5. 0
      17 October 2011 20: 29
      yeah, and the line in the half-store will extend the bayonet shaft to infinity
  7. +1
    12 October 2011 18: 49
    For some reason, diligently in the arisen discussion about the need for a new machine gun, one of the existing ones, but not adopted for service, is hushed up. Moreover, this machine has several times higher accuracy than the "Kalash". I mean the Baryshev machine gun.
  8. +3
    12 October 2011 19: 05
    In the first photo of AEK,
    on the second AK-74 with a telescopic butt a la m4a1, a rice forend and a pistol grip, then why is there an Akogovsky sight and a tactical grip with a flashlight and ltsu - is that for the army? even in the same fucking states this is not there, you need a principle there - you buy ....
    everything is already indicated here, for the automaton of the future or at least the present:
  9. ALEX26659
    -4
    12 October 2011 19: 22
    I am for - to disperse the Ministry of Defense, to transplant everyone and shoot for reliability)))
  10. 0
    12 October 2011 21: 22
    Funny, funny, but in kind, it's time to put these freaks to the wall.
  11. +3
    13 October 2011 00: 53
    Yes, they waved already with AEK-971 and AN-94 or the hundredth series with .. bodykits ... they are 30 years old ... they need to break ahead ... and ... or do something revolutionary and so it was it makes no sense to change ....
    1. 0
      13 October 2011 20: 10
      Yes, they waved already with AEK-971 and AN-94 or the hundredth series with .. bodykits ... they are 30 years old ... they need to break ahead ... and ... or do something revolutionary and so it was it makes no sense to change ....

      For example, a gaus rifle, a la "stalker"? To be honest, Aek liked more than the same abakan (cleaning) and AK (recoil), but back it's just my opinion, about the body kit - so it can be ordered on the same ebay, somewhere for $ 300 - for everything except the sight ( there was a need).
  12. mind1954
    +8
    13 October 2011 02: 27
    I’m not a specialist in small arms, but I love him,
    as an engineer. Therefore, I believe that no accuracy
    may justify the presence of a moving trunk.
    Bullpap, of course a little thing spectacular, but the center of gravity
    is changing. Is it good ?

    But actually, here one viewer correctly sent on TV
    transfer offer! If the Kalashnikov assault rifles
    they don’t need their 17 million pieces, they don’t know where to put them,
    then LET WE BUY THEM and support our gunsmiths !!!
    I am pleased to support this proposal!
    I will take it off from myself as much as I need, I will not regret it.
    Are we worse than the Swiss? (And they get it for free!).
    1. Joker
      +1
      13 October 2011 09: 45
      I support, you give a trunk to each house.
      1. +11
        13 October 2011 10: 18
        Remark: Give a barrel to everyone Russian house!
    2. 0
      13 October 2011 20: 05
      I completely agree ... You still forgot Israel ...
  13. +2
    13 October 2011 10: 22
    In general, the AK circuit is too utilitarian; abandoning it will be very difficult. One way or another, no matter what machine gun is adopted, it will carry in itself the same scheme of 1949 ...
    It seems to me that the Kalashnikov assault rifle will live until the end of the era of gunpowder firearms.
  14. Owl
    +4
    13 October 2011 13: 39
    For conscripts ("goyushnikov"), a mob is enough for the next 20-25 years. stocks AK-74, for special units (work in the forest, work indoors, "low-noise" shooting and covert work in the dark, it is necessary to develop a similar, in terms of reliability, machine gun, which has various shooting devices, attachments and has (for different units and various tasks performed) calibers 5,45x39, 7,62x39 and 9x39.
  15. +3
    13 October 2011 16: 32
    The article is written in the "banter" style. And who is the author making fun of? Yes above all of us: "The reform is moving along the planned path, and not all of its nuances are clear to the philistine masses!"
    I am very happy for the author who understands the course of the military reform, but the course of the reform is incomprehensible to the Supreme Commander-in-Chief, neither the Minister of Defense, nor the Chief of the General Staff. Everyone knows their official statements contradicting their recent statements on their vision of the new appearance of the Armed Forces. So to go into details does not make sense: THE PLAN OF REFORMING THE ACTION WASN’T WAS AND NO.
    It is outraged by the approach of the leading officials of the Moscow Region to solving such problems. WITHOUT PRELIMINARY RESEARCHES OF THE QUESTION, ITS DETAILED WORK, ANOTHER VOLUNTARIAN DECISION IS TAKEN.
    Bloggers have already expressed their opinions on similar decisions by the leaders of the Moscow Region. As a result of which, not only weapons and types of ships are undeservedly destroyed, but also are put on the brink of survival of the defense industry.
    No one is against a GOOD AND RELIABLE, battle-tested weapon, but one should not become like the "pig by the oak" from Krylov's fable and destroy the weapon that saved many of our fighters and which today has a well-deserved authority in the world.
    Interestingly, to what "masses" does the author count himself?
    1. Imperialist
      -1
      13 October 2011 19: 57
      Anyone who wants one will understand one who does not want one and will not understand.

      Let’s not reform the army, but leave it as it was a piece of the Soviet army created for a completely different country and military infrastructure, not even capable of effectively resolving local conflicts.

      Let's abandon the AK. The Moisin rifle is still more reliable and easy to use.
      You should not destroy those weapons that have been tested by two world wars and saved the lives of many of our fighters and which today have a well-deserved authority in the world.
  16. +5
    13 October 2011 21: 28
    What is the debate about accuracy? Indeed, in a real battle, not a single reasonable shooter will release the entire store in one turn. During the years of my service in the SA, we were taught to cut off 2-3 rounds. And then there was AKM. With sufficient practice, aiming in principle is not necessary - the machine becomes an extension of your hands. The only thing missing was the NVD. At night, you only shoot at the flash, and it may be too late.
    1. 0
      13 October 2011 21: 36
      In general, I am for modularity and multi-caliber, it is very approved - on one condition - from AEK (AK) do not try to make a sniper ...
  17. Tjumenec72
    0
    19 October 2011 13: 25
    Nobody refuses from the AK-74; it will continue to lie in warehouses in anticipation of the general mobilization. And for modern (local) wars, you need a qualitatively different weapon!
    And it is not necessary to mass-produce it at all, quick response groups should arm and that’s it. Even expensive and complex systems are suitable - the main thing is that they meet the task. You can also select the caliber necessary for this matter.
    And the existing AK stocks are slowly being customized for the same draftees.
  18. +2
    3 November 2011 11: 58
    we will argue for a long time. to collect all this iron to a heap and to test everything on the training ground. then it will be seen
  19. posad636
    -1
    11 November 2011 01: 40
    Maybe it's time to stop all this psychosis with guns? There are so many that there’s nowhere to go! 50 years is enough for the eyes! What do they offer us? Something fundamentally new? Of course not. Then why dope? Money nowhere to go?
    In Afghanistan, the spirits used primitive weapons and achieved amazing results. The point is not in the machines, but in the ability to use them. AK-47, AKM, AK-74 will be pleased with their results for a long time.
    I’ll add from myself that I respect the caliber 7, 62. 5, 45 very much, as I didn’t show myself in Afghanistan .....
  20. nikolai-kuvaldin
    -1
    11 November 2011 22: 06
    AK with all its modifications, AEK and others resemble Chinese toys. First, figure out what it is for. It is better to run into a bayonet with a "Mosinka" or a spear, storm the enemy's trenches as in the Second World War and spend three of ours on one fritz. In simplicity and reliability, Kalash, and most importantly in convenience and accuracy, surpassed the Austrians and Israelis. AK, AEK and other our developments are based on the WWII platform and were developed 20-30 years ago. About Kalash were AK, AKM, AK-74 (S, U, N), and the designations of AK-47 were NOT in the USSR!
    1. posad636
      +1
      11 November 2011 22: 23
      You would not be dishonored here.
      1. +2
        11 November 2011 23: 58
        So you are embarrassed by your stupid comments, the person expresses his opinion, and you climb to plant. Better go learn lessons on Monday, otherwise mom will scold.
  21. nikolai-kuvaldin
    +1
    12 November 2011 19: 34
    at the expense of disgrace did not understand in what place. If about AK, then "SHOOTING INSTRUCTIONS 7,62-mm KALASHNIKOV AUTOMATOR (AK)" no more "47" NO-THAT! About reliability, the telescopic sight of the Austrian assault rifle AUG heated up to 120 in the sauna and threw itself into the snow at -30 degrees (requirements of the Austrian army). Who fired with AK in fur coats in winter? In the AUG, the trigger guard allows you to shoot with mittens (HERE AND EUROPE). We just got hung up on the principles of Kalashnikov. He is a good man and a good machine gun, but the world does not stand still. Materials and technology have gone far ahead. If you buy new assault rifles, you first need to determine for WHOM, and then the Ministry of Defense should set REQUIREMENTS, and only after that the military-industrial complex should offer new and modernized weapons, and not require the army to order what is available. So it was under the Tsar, under Stalin, and over the hill too.
    1. valex
      +1
      23 June 2012 15: 21
      Have you tried to shoot in mittens?
    2. 0
      24 January 2014 13: 18
      Quote: nikolai-kuvaldin
      If you buy new machine guns, you first need to determine for WHO, and then the Ministry of Defense should set REQUIREMENTS, and only after that the military-industrial complex should offer new and modernized weapons

      I agree with this. Do not suck the weapon out of your finger and use the principles of the order: "but invent a new machine gun for us ... For what purposes and conditions? Yes, hell knows. Then we'll figure it out ... (but what would be reliable as an AK and a squirrel in the eye from 5 km. . yes, that would cost no more than a can of sprat and any stupid person could handle it ...) "
      If the Defense Ministry nevertheless spawns a distinct TK on small arms, our Kulibins (with normal funding, of course) will issue SUCH WEAPON that the remaining weapon barons will only have to return to the issue of bows and spears. lol
  22. dred
    0
    25 November 2011 19: 29
    I’ll hurry to look at the AK-12
  23. 0
    31 December 2011 12: 33
    guys not all komenty read. but here are my comments on your conclusions. The use of small arms occurs squarely by the nesting method, i.e. the number of bullets in a certain time per unit area. learn the sergeant’s textbook. in Europe it was understood back in the 16th century and was successfully used. and apply so far.

    guys not all komenty read. but here are my comments on your conclusions. The use of small arms occurs squarely by the nesting method, i.e. the number of bullets in a certain time per unit area. learn the sergeant’s textbook. in Europe it was understood in the century so it is 16 and has been successfully applied and is still being applied. AK47 and ACX 74 AK74 are the best option.
  24. AK61
    0
    17 January 2012 13: 57
    IMHO 7,62+ "bullpup", and to return to the original barrel length of the AKM - that's what we call the AK-300.
    1. 0
      18 January 2012 11: 34
      Bullpup A-91 was originally created for the caliber of 7,62, has a standard barrel length (like AKM), the release of cartridges (and at the same time the powder gases of the automation mechanism) forward, far from the face. Integrated grenade launcher (if desired, can be removed). http://topwar.ru/6727-556a-91-malogabaritnyy-avtomat.html
      In general, different types of small arms and bullpups and classics should go to the Army. For example, in a city a convenient bullpup, in a field and in the mountains, is more convenient than a classic.
      The choice should be for those who directly solve problems, and not for those who are sitting in the office.
      1. AK61
        0
        18 January 2012 15: 47
        Well, what am I talking about?
  25. 0
    13 February 2012 02: 37
    my opinion the machine should always work ......... until they make a trouble-free cartridge case without a cartridge ...... or I don’t know there is a rifle firing plasma. AK replacement will not be ......... yes less accurate yes ergonomics at the level of 2 WWII ........ Norod we have such a machine .......... (this is us did not praise) ... but it is necessary to work in this direction. the engineering idea should not stagnate. but here the trouble is in the absence of a civilian arms market
    .All our gunsmiths are doing things that no one would have bought in comparison with any Western model because all this seems to be done poorly .............. reliability yes. but wretchedly like everything with us
  26. Vilis
    0
    24 February 2012 20: 15
    What I like more and more on this site! So this is the inconsistency of the authors of the articles !! Some write that they’ve dropped out of armament, while others write that they don’t !! I am personally for a new weapon rather than an old one! Ak is certainly cool, but old people have to stomp the way young, whatever it is !! sad fellow