Development and role of air defense missile systems in the air defense system. Part 6

49


The end of the "cold war" and the collapse of the USSR for some time reduced the threat of a large-scale military conflict. Against this background, serious cuts in the armed forces and military budgets have occurred in the countries of the global confrontation. It seemed to many that after the collapse of the communist ideology, humanity finally entered an era of peaceful coexistence and the primacy of international law.

Against this background, the military and political leadership of many states has lost interest in defensive anti-aircraft systems. Work on the creation of new and modernization of existing complexes has slowed down or completely ceased. Moreover, in order to save, many air defense missile systems with a large residual resource and modernization potential were written off.

To a greater degree this affected the armies of Eastern European countries, former participants of the Warsaw Pact and the former Soviet republics. In 70-80-s, dozens of medium-range and long-range air defense missile systems were deployed in the states of the Eastern Bloc, which formed a kind of air defense barrier protecting the western borders of the Soviet Union.


Satellite image of Google earth: the layout of the position of the air defense system of the Cold War in Europe


At that time, not much less anti-aircraft complexes were deployed in the territory of the European countries-allies of the USA, especially in terms of the number of positions of the air defense missile system, West Germany stood out.


Satellite image of Google earth: air defense system deployed in Europe as of 2010 year


Currently, the number of deployed positions of anti-aircraft complexes in Europe has decreased significantly. Many former allies of the USSR, changing their orientation, switched to Western standards of weapons.


Satellite image of Google earth: the position of the Polish C-125 air defense system in the Gdansk region


The exception is Poland, where the modernized Soviet air defense systems C-125, Romania with the old C-75 in the area of ​​Bucharest and Albania with their unique for Europe Chinese HQ-2 (copy C-75) remained in service.

Development and role of air defense missile systems in the air defense system. Part 6

Polish C-125 ADMS on T-55 chassis


The rest of the states either finally demolished the old Soviet complexes, or transferred them to "storage". However, in some European countries, Russian long-range air defense systems will remain in service for a long time. The air defense systems of the C-XNUMPPMU and PMU-300 export versions are available in Bulgaria, Slovakia and Greece.

European countries that have anti-aircraft complexes in their arsenals are almost entirely armed with American air defense systems. Somewhere in service are still preserved late modifications of the air defense system "Hawk", but their cancellation is the matter of the near future. The last positions of the Nike-Hercules long-range air defense system in Italy and Turkey were eliminated in the early 2000s. To replace the outdated anti-aircraft systems, the United States is actively promoting the Patriot air defense system. Thus, under pressure from the Americans, Turkey disavowed the decision made by purchasing the Chinese air defense system HQ-9.


Patriot submarine Patriot PAC-3 US Army, deployed in Turkey


In April, 2015, Warsaw, officially approved the purchase of the American Patriot air defense missile systems as part of a project to create a national air defense system, the Vistula. In total, Poland plans to purchase eight batteries of the Patriot air defense missile system worth over $ 4,3 billion.


Satellite image of Google earth: the position of the Patriot air defense system in Germany


Currently, Patriot complexes are permanently deployed in Europe, Germany, the Netherlands, Greece, Turkey and Spain.

In addition to the US-made SAM systems in Italy, modernized 2000 Spud systems are used to cover air bases.


Satellite image of Google earth: the layout of the 2000 Spread SAM system in Italy


France, which, until recently, pursued an independent policy of military development, does not have medium and long-range anti-aircraft systems on alert. Air defense of the country is provided by fighter aviation. However, from time to time not far from the air bases and important centers of industry and energy at pre-prepared positions, the deployment of the Crotale-NG short-range air defense system takes place.


Satellite image of Google earth: ZRK position ZRK "Crotal" near Orleans


After the start of “market reforms”, the leadership of Russia began a landslide reduction of the armed forces, and this fully affected the air defense units. As of the year 1990, the Soviet air defense missile defense missile defense missile system had more than 6500 medium and long range air defense missile systems, of which more than 1700 C-300P civil defense missile systems. Most of this inheritance went to Russia.

After 5 years, the number of air defense systems carrying combat duty decreased several times. Of course, the decommissioning of obsolete types of air defense systems was inevitable, but along with the old ones, in our country, complexes that still had a large residual resource and modernization potential were written off.

At that time, it would be reasonable to extend the operation with the subsequent phased modernization of long-range air defense systems C-200D, placing them on the border - coastal directions (European North of the Russian Federation and the Far East) where there is the greatest activity of reconnaissance and combat aircraft of "potential partners". Even today, this air defense system remains unsurpassed in terms of range, the mass production of new 40H6E long-range missiles for C-400 SAMs, which should have a range of up to 400 km, is not yet established. But in the 90s, the then leadership of the Russian Federation was no longer concerned about protecting the airspace, but about how to please the "American partners."

This fully applies to the low-altitude medium-range air defense system S-125. Later modifications of this complex could still be effectively operated, performing the tasks of covering long-range air defense systems and protecting objects deep in the territory of the Russian Federation. The S-125 air defense system has far from exhausted its capabilities; subject to modernization, it is able to successfully carry out tasks to combat tactical aircraft, cruise missiles and drones, complementing more modern and long-range systems.


Satellite image of Google earth: C-125 air defense system in Armenia


Russia has successfully implemented C-125 export modernization programs. There is even a competition of proposals from various Russian manufacturers: Almaz-Anteya offers the Pechora-2А variant, and Defense Systems JSC offers the С-125-2М Pechora-2М variant. To date, not only has the old systems been upgraded for these projects in a number of countries, but Russian enterprises have concluded a number of contracts for the supply of modified complexes to countries where C-125 was not in service (Myanmar, Venezuela).


Mobile PU ZRK C-125-2М “Pechora-2М” air defense of Venezuela


Until now, in many countries where Soviet-made air defense systems were supplied, their operation continues. This provides ample opportunities for their modernization and delivery of new complexes. However, for this you need to stop looking at the opinion of Washington.


Google Earth satellite image: ZRK position of Z-200VE ZRK in Iran


In 90-ies there was a global trend of decline in interest in air defense systems, slowing down the pace of production and the development of new complexes. Contrary to this trend in Israel at the same time, a number of new interesting patterns were created corresponding to the highest international standards. This is explained by the fact that by the middle of the 80's, the Israeli military-industrial complex had reached the necessary technological level, and the design engineers had gained some experience. In addition, Israel, in contrast to post-Soviet Russia, has never saved on basic scientific research and has generously paid high-class specialists, including from other countries. The development of its own air defense and missile defense systems in Israel was fueled by the traditionally hostile Arab environment and regular rocket attacks. A special threat was presented by the OTR available in neighboring countries and developed by MRBM capable of carrying warheads with weapons of mass destruction. Therefore, special emphasis was placed on the development of anti-missile systems.


Arrow anti-missile test launch


In 1990, the first test launch of the anti-missile Arrow, created jointly by experts from the American Corporation "Lockheed-Martin" and the Israeli firm IAI, took place. An enhanced version of the Arrow-2 as part of the Hets missile defense system was deployed in March 2000 at the Palmachim airbase, south of Tel Aviv. The second anti-missile battery was deployed and put on alert in October 2002 at Ein Shemer airbase. Deployed batteries, which are directly subordinate to the Israeli Air Defense Command, provide cover for up to 85% of the country. Arrow-2 anti-missiles are designed to destroy enemy missiles in the stratosphere. The Arrow-2 system is capable of detecting and tracking up to 12 targets simultaneously, as well as directing one of them to two anti-missile systems capable of speeding up to 2,5 km per second.


Satellite image of Google earth: the deployment of long-range anti-aircraft and anti-missile systems in Israel as of 2010 year

The territory of Israel is very well covered by a long-range air defense system, today it is the only state, most of whose territory is protected by a centralized missile defense system. Given the relatively small area of ​​the state of Israel, the density of the location of the air defense system, he gets tired only of the Moscow region.

To protect against unguided tactical missiles at ranges from 4 to 70 kilometers, the Iron Dome tactical missile defense system (“Iron Dome”) is intended. The first battery went into combat duty in March 2011 of the year.


The Iron Dome launches a rocket during Operation Cloud Pillar


In the middle of the 2014 of the year, combat duty was carried by 9 batteries throughout Israel. By the end of 2014, the Iron Dome batteries had successfully shot down over 1000 missiles. The number of successfully intercepted targets is estimated at 85%. The system is capable of detecting a threat in 100% of cases, but the complex did not always succeed in destroying several simultaneously launched projectiles.

On the 2012 year, each launch of the Iron Dome missile system cost in 30 — 40 thousand US dollars, which is many times higher than the cost of any of the possible intercepted missiles. Thus, even with 100% efficiency, intercepting the attack is much more expensive than the cost of the attack itself. But the economic efficiency of the system lies in the fact that previously, when a rocket hit a residential quarter, the state paid at least one million shekels (about 250 000 dollars) of compensation to the city and its inhabitants.

During the "Second Lebanon War" in July-August, 2006 was launched around Israel around 4000 missiles, 1000 of which hit settlements. Only direct damage amounted to about 1,5 billion dollars. Using the Iron Dome would have cost 50 — 100 million dollars. The same can be seen on the example of the operation “Cast Lead”. Thus, in the event of a long-term conflict, the costs of missiles account for only 3 — 7% of the cost of possible damage. Confirmation of the effectiveness of the "Iron Dome" can be seen with the naked eye in the sky over Israeli cities.



In 2013, the developers of the Iron Dome reported that they managed to significantly reduce the price of interceptor missiles - up to several thousand dollars. The main reduction was achieved by simplifying the missile guidance system, which, incidentally, did not affect its effectiveness.

In November, 2012, representatives of the Israel Defense Forces reported on the successful testing of the “Trout David” missile defense system. The missile defense system designed to intercept medium-range missiles should be commissioned by the Israeli army in 2015.

The basis of the complex - anti-missile Stunner. This two-stage rocket is equipped with two guidance systems (optical-electronic and radar). "David's sling" is capable of hitting ballistic targets with a range from 70 to 300 kilometers. The new system is designed to deal with long-range missiles, missed missile defense systems "Hetz".

The September 11 attacks of 2001 revealed weak protection of the US territory from air attacks. Built with fighter-interceptor support, the air defense system was unable to counter all threats.

After the terrorist attacks, in which captured civilian airliners were used around a number of important objects, including the White House in Washington, the Avenger short-range air defense system was deployed.


Short-range air defense system "Avenger"


Mass deliveries of this complex to the troops began at the beginning of the 90's. Avenger is designed to hit air targets at 0,5-5,5 km distances, 0,5-3,8 km altitudes on heading courses and in pursuit. The complex is equipped with a Stinger MANPADS missile with a thermal homing head.

Placing the Avengers in the city center immediately after the attacks was rather a demonstration and psychological step designed to stop panic and calm public opinion. This complex could not intercept a multi-ton airliner at a safe distance from the protected object. In this regard, in the vicinity of Washington in May 2004, three SLAMRAAM launchers were placed. Thus, the capital has become the only object in the United States which is protected by medium-range air defense systems, carrying combat duty on an ongoing basis.


Satellite image of Google earth: the layout of the SLAMRAAM SAM system in the vicinity of Washington


SAM SLAMRAAM - this is the American version of the Norwegian-American complex NASAMS. A jointly developed complex created using the US air-to-air missile system AIM-120 AMRAAM entered service with the Norwegian Air Force in the middle of the 90's. SLAMRAAM SAM can hit air targets at a range - up to 40 km and at a height - up to 16 km.


PU SAM SLAMRAAM


SAM SLAMRAAM - this is the American version of the Norwegian-American complex NASAMS. A jointly developed complex created using the US air-to-air missile system AIM-120 AMRAAM entered service with the Norwegian Air Force in the middle of the 90's. SLAMRAAM SAM can hit air targets at a range - up to 40 km and at a height - up to 16 km.

In the first decade of the 21 century, the armed forces of many states expressed a desire to upgrade existing anti-aircraft systems. This was mainly due to the destabilizing role of the United States and the unleashing of a number of regional conflicts by this country. The intensification of the development and procurement of the air defense missile system is consistent with the characteristic of modern wars and conflicts, the continuous strengthening of the role of aviation and air attack weapons. As well as an increase in demand for funds intended to protect tactical ballistic missiles and operational-tactical ballistic missiles from attacks. Replacement of systems and air defense systems of previous generations due to their mass and complete obsolescence is ripe. In this regard, many countries have intensified work on the creation of their own medium-range and long-range air defense systems. Along the way, with an increase in defense capability, the independent development and production of anti-aircraft systems makes it possible to increase the national scientific and technical potential, create new jobs and reduce dependence on foreign arms manufacturers.

In 2000, the French short-range air defense system VL MICA was presented in Singapore at Asian Aerospace. SAM VL MICA developed on the basis of the MICA air-to-air missile. The complex is compact, high efficiency. The standard composition of ground-based VL MICA air defense system consists of four launchers, a command center of the complex and a radar detection system.


SAM VL MICA


The modular design of the MICA missile makes it possible to have in the ammunition package of the complex means of destruction with various homing systems and to use their advantages depending on the combat situation. The MICA missile can be equipped with an active pulse-Doppler radar homing head (MICA-EM) or thermal imaging (MICA-IR). The maximum firing range is 20 km, the maximum height of the targets hit is 10 km.

Initially, the 2000's in Israel completed the development of a short-range and medium-range Spyder mobile air defense system designed for air defense of ground forces units and infrastructure against aircraft, helicopter, cruise missiles and unmanned aerial vehicles. The complex ensures the defeat of single and group targets at any time of the day.


Mobile PU ZRK Spyder


SAM Spyder belongs to the family of anti-aircraft complexes, using as a means of destruction of aircraft missiles. A feature of the complex is the presence in its ammunition of rockets with different homing systems - a guided Derby missile with an active radar seeker and a Phyton missile with a thermal seeker. This combination ensures the all-weather, stealthness and effectiveness of the combat use of the complex at a distance of 35 km.

The complex includes: a command post, a radar station, self-propelled launchers with four TLC missiles and transport-loading machines. Elements of the air defense missile system are installed on the chassis of the vehicle.

The Israeli anti-aircraft missile system "Spider" is actively promoting the international arms market. Currently in the SPYDER-SR version it is in service with the ground forces of Georgia, India, Singapore and Azerbaijan.

One of the latest Israeli developments was the Barak-8 SAM system, which is a variant of the ship complex adapted for ground air defense. The Barak-8 rocket is a two-stage solid-propellant missile defense system with a length of 4,5 m, equipped with an active homing system. The rocket is launched using a vertical launcher and is capable of intercepting a target at a distance of 70-80 km in difficult weather conditions at any time of the day. After launch, the rocket receives target designation from the radar guidance. On approaching the target, the ZUR activates the radar seeker.

Together with the three European states, France, Italy and the UK, the SAMP-T ZRS was created. This development envisaged the creation of a universal land-based and sea-based system based on Aster 15 / 30 missiles, capable of fighting both aircraft and ballistic targets. The design and testing of the system lasted more than 20 years, and reached the final stretch only in the 2000-s. Prior to this, the characteristics of the system, and its fate were very vague.


Test start Zur Aster 30


As a result, the developers managed to create an air defense system that is capable of creating competition for the American Patriot air defense system. Tests conducted in 2011-2014 years confirmed the ability of SAMP-T SAMs to fight both air targets at a distance of 3-100 km, flying at an altitude up to 25 km and intercept ballistic missiles at a distance of 3-35 km.

SAMP-T ZRS is able to conduct circular shooting at 360 degrees, has a modular design and highly maneuverable rockets. This system is already in trial operation in France and in Italy.

What is called the Franco-Italian system SAMP-T "comes on the heels" of the MEADS. The development of the system is carried out in the interests of three states: the USA, Germany and Italy. To date, the United States has invested a billion dollars in the development of the 1,5 complex. The MEADS system is capable of firing two types of missiles: PAC-3 MSE and IRIS-T SL. The first is an upgraded version of the PAC-3 rocket and is used in the Patriot air defense system, the second is the ground version of the German air-to-air melee rocket IRIS-T. The fully equipped unit consists of one circular radar station, two fire control machines, six mobile launchers with 12 missiles.


MEADS ZRS


According to preliminary specifications, the new air and missile defense system will be capable of striking both aircraft and tactical medium-range ballistic missiles with a range of up to 1000 kilometers. Initially, MEADS was created to replace the Patriot air defense system. Currently, the anti-aircraft system is in the process of debugging and control tests. As expected, the MEADS ZRS can be fitted into the 2018 year.



To be continued ...


Based on:
http://rbase.new-factoria.ru
http://geimint.blogspot.ru/
http://www.designation-systems.net/
http://www.ausairpower.net/APA-PLA-Div-ADS.html

ARTICLES FROM THIS SERIES:

Development and role of air defense missile systems in the air defense system. Part 1
Development and role of air defense missile systems in the air defense system. Part 2
Development and role of air defense missile systems in the air defense system. Part 3
Development and role of air defense missile systems in the air defense system. Part 4
Development and role of air defense missile systems in the air defense system. Part 5
49 comments
Information
Dear reader, to leave comments on the publication, you must sign in.
  1. +9
    8 May 2015 06: 57
    Very interesting articles from a knowledgeable author. Many thanks!
    1. +1
      8 May 2015 10: 30
      Everything flows, everything changes. Other times have come with us. In principle, the missile defense system is very relevant for us now, we are gradually converting long-range air defense systems to missile defense missions - the missiles from the missile defense system have come out and are creating it from scratch — a revolutionary way, and we have taken the evolutionary path c300, c400, c500.
      1. +1
        9 May 2015 22: 44
        Quote: Malkor
        amer_y from the ABM came out and create it from scratch -

        They have been indulging in this missile defense system since the 50s of that century.
  2. +2
    8 May 2015 09: 12
    Speaking of the supply of S-300 to Iran. Israel is already training to overcome the air defense system.
    http://theaviationist.com/2015/05/06/iaf-f-16-vs-haf-s300s/
    1. +9
      8 May 2015 09: 25
      Quote: Lt. air force reserve
      Speaking of the supply of C-300 to Iran. Israel is already training to overcome the pro system.

      Well, probably not About а Defense, although Israel has the ability to carry nuclear weapons. On the other hand, what surprises you is a perfectly reasonable step, it would be strange if such a pragmatic people did not take this opportunity. Israelis are not the first to do this Yes Or do you think that the aviation of "potential partners" will miss the opportunity to train on the real S-300P air defense systems that they have?
      1. +1
        8 May 2015 09: 29
        Quote: Bongo
        Or do you think that the aviation of "potential partners" will miss the opportunity to train on the real S-300P air defense systems that they have?

        In a certain subject, the opposite was stated to me. That there is no evidence of opposition to the C-300 systems in the exercises by Western countries.
        1. +7
          8 May 2015 09: 41
          Quote: Lt. air force reserve
          In a certain subject, the opposite was stated to me. That there is no evidence of opposition to the C-300 systems in the exercises by Western countries.

          Did I argue? stop It would be strange if they were not trained. You will be unpleasantly surprised to find out how many active Soviet radars and strategic missile systems are in the NATO countries. In the USA, they still use C-300P sold by him in 90 during the exercises.
          1. +1
            11 May 2015 18: 05
            sold by Ukraine?
            1. +2
              12 May 2015 02: 13
              Quote: ArikKhab
              sold by Ukraine?

              In Ukraine, they bought 36D6 radars. S-300Belarus was sold through the mediation of Rosvooruzhenie.
              http://www.kapyar.ru/index.php?pg=417
        2. +4
          8 May 2015 11: 28
          Quote: Lt. air force reserve
          That there is no evidence of opposition to the S-300 systems at the exercises by Western countries.

          Israel "tested" its aircraft on the S-300 in Greece.
          1. 0
            11 May 2015 18: 06
            yes, Israel is quite closely cooperating with Greece in the military field
      2. +3
        8 May 2015 09: 58
        Quote: Bongo
        Well, probably not ABM but air defense,

        Now air defense systems can shoot down cruise missiles and conduct limited fire on ballistic targets.
        Quote: Bongo
        In the United States, the S-300P sold by him in the 90s is still used in exercises.

        In any case, the modernized C-300 will most likely be sold to Iran. And all that NATO countries have are the old C-300 models.
        1. +6
          8 May 2015 10: 09
          Quote: Lt. air force reserve
          Now air defense systems can shoot down cruise missiles and fire limited ballistic targets

          Certainly Yes Your link is new: http: //theaviationist.com/2015/05/06/iaf-f-16-vs-haf-s300s/
          We are talking about the Israeli fighter F-16I, which train on the Greek S-300PMU. What does this have to do with missile defense?
          Quote: Lt. air force reserve
          In any case, the modernized C-300 will most likely be sold to Iran. And all that NATO countries have are the old C-300 models.

          Those. Do you want to say that the S-300PMU and PMU-1 available in NATO are outdated models, despite the fact that about our S-300PS, which compare the basis of air defense in the domestic media, they write as "Having no analogues"?
          1. 0
            8 May 2015 10: 26
            Quote: Bongo
            Those. Do you want to say that the S-300PMU and PMU-1 available in NATO are outdated models, despite the fact that about our S-300PS, which compare the basis of air defense in the domestic media, they write as "Having no analogues"?

            All modifications of our S-300s are now being upgraded to modification B4. The S-300 is now discontinued, so either S-300B4 will be delivered from its reserves or the Antey-2500 modification will be sold.
            Quote: Bongo
            We are talking about the Israeli fighter F-16I, which train on the Greek S-300PMU. What does this have to do with missile defense?

            They train to enter the air defense system and launch cruise missiles, so most likely the system will work with missiles, not planes, that is, perform missile defense functions (when they say missile defense is not only intercepting intercontinental ballistic missiles, but generally any missiles in principle) .
            1. +8
              8 May 2015 10: 37
              You will excuse me, of course, I don’t know how professional you are in the Air Force, but you understand superficially in air defense systems. What is only this statement worth:
              Quote: Lt. air force reserve
              All modifications of our C-300 are now being upgraded to the B4 modification.
              wassat Excuse me, how do you propose upgrading the S-300PS air defense system in the army S-300В4?
              Quote: Lt. air force reserve
              when they say missile defense is not only the interception of intercontinental ballistic missiles, but generally any missiles in principle

              Please tell the ZRV officers about this, they will certainly learn a lot. How is the defeat of the Kyrgyz Republic fundamentally different from a fighter or a drone? There is a very big difference when hitting a ballistic and aerodynamic target.
              1. +1
                8 May 2015 11: 09
                Quote: Bongo
                Excuse me, how do you propose upgrading the S-300PS air defense system in the army S-300В4?

                Slightly mistaken with ps, pmu, sms all sorts. S-300PS will be replaced by S-400, modification of the PS will be displayed in reserve.
                The C-300B4 air defense system represents a further modernization of the S-300V and S-300VM air defense systems.
                Quote: Bongo
                Please tell the ZRV officers about this, they will certainly learn a lot. How is the defeat of the Kyrgyz Republic fundamentally different from a fighter or a drone? There is a very big difference when hitting a ballistic and aerodynamic target.

                This is not about defeat, but about the ability of all modern modifications of the C-300 to work on a wide range of goals, which include aircraft and cruise missiles and limited ballistic.
                1. +4
                  8 May 2015 14: 43
                  Quote: Lt. air force reserve
                  This is not about defeat, but about the ability of all modern modifications of the C-300 to work on a wide range of goals, which include aircraft and cruise missiles and limited ballistic.

                  What do you mean by modern? The most modern modifications of the C-300PM in service in the Russian Federation entered the troops in the middle of the 90's. I have great doubts that they are able to work effectively on ballistic goals. Especially for the fight against TBR, an army C-300В with a 9М82 missile was created, this missile is not included in the S-300P ammunition. Unfortunately, the beginning of the mass production of С-300В coincided with the collapse of the USSR and therefore it was built approximately 10 times less than С-300П.
        2. +2
          8 May 2015 11: 33
          Quote: Lt. air force reserve
          In any case, the modernized C-300 will most likely be sold to Iran. And all that NATO countries have are the old C-300 models.

          S-300s are no longer being produced; they planned to sell Iran air defense missile systems removed from combat duty ... with refinement of the recognition system, of course ...
  3. +2
    8 May 2015 09: 29
    It is strange that the author did not mention the S-300PMU2 and S-400, will there probably be a separate article?
    Well ... MEADS is certainly a promising complex and has already passed many tests, but it has not been adopted yet. Moreover, the clouds of termination of funding have repeatedly gathered over him ...
    In fact, currently the main air defense systems in the world are the S-300PMU2, S-400, SAMP-T (aka MAMBA) and Patriot PAC-3 with a range of 100 km. and further. Well, the Chinese with their cat in a bag HQ-9 ...
    It is unclear why the Poles decided to stock up the Patriot PAC-3, so MEADS will be abruptly ...
    1. 0
      8 May 2015 10: 38
      Quote: Nayhas
      It is unclear why the Poles decided to stock up the Patriot PAC-3, so MEADS will be abruptly ...

      What would Polish apples be exchanged immediately for barter for THAAD.
  4. +6
    8 May 2015 09: 36
    Quote: Nayhas
    It is strange that the author did not mention С-300ПМУ2 and С-400, there will probably be a separate article?

    C-300ПМУ2 is a purely export option, I don’t see any sense on it separately, but I will definitely be talking about c-400.
    Quote: Nayhas
    Well ... MEADS is certainly a promising complex and has already passed many tests, but it has not been adopted yet.

    The publication does not state that it has been adopted. But personally, my opinion is that they will bring it to mind, too much has been invested in it.
    Quote: Nayhas
    It is unclear why the Poles decided to stock up the Patriot PAC-3, so MEADS will be abruptly ...

    This is a purely political step, in principle, they could have bought something in Russia.
    1. +3
      8 May 2015 11: 26
      Quote: Bongo
      and about the s-400 will be sure.

      Okay ...
      Quote: Bongo
      The publication does not state that it has been adopted. But personally, my opinion is that they will bring it to mind, too much has been invested in it.

      Is not a fact. History knows cases when Americans chopped seemingly promising systems ... Around MEADS constantly bad statements are made. After all, it was conceived as a joint project of the United States and Europe, but before the Crimea, Europeans often whined about the crisis and declared that they were leaving the project (it’s more profitable to spend money on the idle loafers from Africa). Now they will probably find the means, although also not a fact.
      Quote: Bongo
      This is a purely political step, in principle, they could have bought something in Russia.

      It would be strange to hear about such a contract.
    2. +1
      8 May 2015 13: 27
      Quote: Bongo
      This is a purely political step, in principle, they could have bought something in Russia.

      Who will allow them
    3. iv_v
      0
      10 May 2015 12: 03
      Quote: Bongo
      But personally, my opinion is that they will bring it to mind, too much has been invested in it


      1,5 yards? Americans spend more on changing camouflage.

      The problem with ground-based air defense systems for amers is, first of all, that they themselves did not need them. The US Army did not encounter ground operations with aircraft. On the other hand, you are right, there is more and more ballistic junk on the planet. So the Americans, judging by the throwing with the purchase of the LCD, understand that something needs to be invented, but have not yet decided what. IMHO, with this administration they will not decide. The military seems to be trying to make lasers to be the most fashionable.
  5. The comment was deleted.
  6. +2
    8 May 2015 12: 49
    You better look at the cards. How will they protect regions where air defense systems are no longer there. About tomorrow (s) from the government we have already heard.
    1. +4
      8 May 2015 14: 51
      Quote: andrei.yandex
      You better look at the cards. How will they protect regions where air defense systems are no longer there. About tomorrow (s) from the government we have already heard.

      I plan in the final part to dwell on this in more detail.
  7. iv_v
    0
    8 May 2015 14: 15
    Explanatory reviews, thanks.

    There are, of course, oddities in style. I’m not sure that the comments of the US foreign policy are so necessary in the arms review (all the more so, experts in this case will run into the comments). But this is now a common misfortune
    1. +6
      8 May 2015 14: 49
      Quote: iv_v
      Explanatory reviews, thanks.

      Thank you hi
      Quote: iv_v
      Of course there are oddities in style

      The taste and color ... request
      Quote: iv_v
      Not sure if US foreign policy commentary is really needed in arms review

      I usually try to refrain from this, but the publication claims not only a description of weapons, but also a minimal analysis of development trends of air defense systems. In my opinion, it was the US aggression against Yugoslavia and Iraq that in many respects provoked an increase in interest in medium and long-range air defense systems.
      1. +1
        8 May 2015 15: 38
        Previously, I read that the LCD spends on each missile partisans Hamas and Hezbollah, two missiles. How would you not mention it this way or not?
        In addition, the spread of missiles, for example, Hamas, is so great that, at best, protected LCDs fly at best 1-2 missiles the rest anywhere but only not at a given object. Hence the myth of the high efficiency of the LCD.
        On the expansion of Hamas-a missiles and in general on the number of simultaneously fired, you can see, for example, on this video, you can clearly see that the number in the salvo is slightly more or equal to 1-6 pieces.
        1. 0
          8 May 2015 15: 47
          And a few more I disagree with this fragment of yours:
          In addition, Israel, unlike post-Soviet Russia, never saved on basic scientific research and generously paid high-class specialists, including from other countries.

          It was not the United States that paid for the development of missile defense, but the United States. In the best cases, Israeli experts developed these systems and this is highly doubtful.

          1. +3
            8 May 2015 16: 01
            Quote: quilted jacket
            And a few more I do not agree with this fragment of yours

            To agree or not - your right ... request
            Quote: quilted jacket
            It was not the United States that paid for the development of missile defense, but the United States. In the best cases, Israeli experts developed these systems and this is highly doubtful.

            The United States, of course, participated, including financially, but the system was developed and put on the database in Israel. The video looked, the usual journalistic blah, blah, blah ... Unfortunately, there are no technical characteristics and facts.
            1. +1
              8 May 2015 17: 00
              Quote: Bongo
              The video looked, the usual journalistic blah, blah, blah ... Unfortunately, there are no technical characteristics and facts.

              So all the stories about the fact that the LCD was developed in Israel is also the usual blah-blah-blah. Not any fact about this except for the Jewish "stories" - no smile
          2. iv_v
            +2
            8 May 2015 16: 09
            Now, I think, the Jews will attack and explain in more detail, but on my own I will advise you not to spread the materials of the Republic of Tajikistan, except in patriotic discussions. When discussing a sane article of this kind of nonsense is inappropriate.
            1. 0
              8 May 2015 16: 22
              Quote: iv_v
              but on my own I advise you not to spread the materials of the Republic of Tajikistan, except in patriotic discussions. When discussing a sane article of this kind of nonsense is inappropriate.

              RT is "nonsense" smile
              It is very interesting that then is not nonsense? Israeli sources glorifying the army of Tel Aviv? lol
              This is generally complete "nonsense" and "fairy tales for children."

              But let's not clog a good topic.
              1. iv_v
                +4
                8 May 2015 16: 58
                You see, just watch the video. If you cannot perceive from sound, try writing text on paper.
                1. RT is worried that the Israeli government is squandering taxpayers' money and lying impudently. He makes his way to tears. Today, by the way, they read the sentence of Vasilyeva.
                2. Mr. Hever, the "writer" who appears in the video as an expert. In terms of the organization of missile defense, his competence is comparable to the late Ms. Novodvorskaya. By the way, Mr. Hever speaks about the same "universal" positions for which he receives EU grants.
                The problem with his position is that a hundred-dollar tube of gunpowder kills Jews from time to time. Apart from the death of the Jews as a problem (and Mr. Hever does not consider it), then knocking down tubes with expensive missiles is irrational. The Israeli government has a different opinion.
                3. Mr. Pedatzur, military analyst. Quite a peculiar type, now deceased. He did not like practically anything the IDF did. In this regard, he resembled Mahatma Gandhi. One cannot but admit that there can be many complaints against the IDF. However, Mr. Pedatzur, as far as I know, merged when asked about more effective complexes.
                As a matter of fact, both theses, which he refutes, are lies.
                No one has ever stated that the system will shoot down 84% of the missiles in its range. It was said about 84% of successful shootings. The feature of the system is the selection of NURSs. If the NURS flies "into the milk" - the system does not work at all and missiles missed are not included in the statistics.
                No one claimed that Sderot’s defense was the only purpose of the dome. Unfortunately, the range of Palestinian missiles is not 1,5 km. (the distance from Gaza to Sderot), but significantly higher. So 9 batteries of the dome protect not one Sderot, but all of Israel.
                To shoot down missiles at distances like Sderot, the Phalanx or Tunguska are certainly better suited. But artillery systems, don't go to a fortune-teller, they will quickly cross over some school in Gaza, this is not the sea, after all. Moreover, it is from schools that the Arab brothers love to launch their rockets. Such a little bird.

                And finally. The text of the journalist of RT is untied from the facts that he reports. He does not talk about the ID system. He denounces Israeli plutocrats and suckers from the United States, who were first bred into grandmas. Actually, under this topic, the Republic of Tatarstan bred suckers from another state on the headstock.
                1. 0
                  8 May 2015 17: 15
                  iv_v
                  RT is worried that the Israeli government is squandering taxpayers' money and lying impudently. He makes his way to tears. Today, by the way, they read the sentence of Vasilyeva.

                  By the way, doesn’t it bother her that she is Jewish?
                  Mr. Pedatsur, military analyst. Quite a peculiar type, now deceased. He did not like practically anything the IDF did.

                  Deal with your "master" Pedatzur yourself. Personally, I think he speaks the pure truth.
                  No one has ever stated that the system will shoot down 84% of the missiles in its range. It was said about 84% of successful shootings. The feature of the system is the selection of NURSs. If the NURS flies "into the milk" - the system does not work at all and missiles missed are not included in the statistics.

                  Is it really bad that Hamas is responding to Israeli aggression by the Kassam? Although it somehow punishes the invaders.
                  Moreover, just from schools, Arab brothers love to launch their rockets.

                  Apparently it was from this that Israel killed more than 500 children in the gas.

                  Personally, for example, I believe in our sources more than in Israel, they are solid - "lies", "storytellers" - they are known all over the world smile
                  1. iv_v
                    +1
                    8 May 2015 17: 57
                    is she jewish


                    Is that what it is all about? To the fact that in Russia only Jews steal budget money?

                    he is telling the truth


                    He speaks the pure truth. The Kupol does not shoot down 84% of the missiles that are in its range. The Kupol shoots down 84% of the missiles that the system estimates will hit homes.

                    This is the rhetorical reception of Ignoratio elenchi, it seems. Make an idiotic statement on behalf of an imaginary opponent and completely honestly refute it. Real opponents have never said such a thing.

                    Deal with your "master" Pedatzur yourself


                    You should deal with him, since you bring his opinion.

                    Is it really bad that Hamas is responding to Israeli aggression by the Kassam? Although it somehow punishes the invaders.


                    And what do these ideas have to do with the effectiveness of a missile defense system? Or that the worse she knocks down kasama - the better?

                    By the way, put, for fun, in your phrase instead of Hamas "Ichkerian rebels and soldiers of Allah."

                    killed over 500 children in the gas


                    Children in Gaza are out of luck with geography. As in Grozny. As in Donetsk. Again, this has nothing to do with the effectiveness of missile defense.
                    1. +2
                      8 May 2015 18: 37
                      Quote: iv_v
                      Is that what it is all about? To the fact that in Russia only Jews steal budget money?

                      You started about Vasilyev. smile
                      The Kupol does not shoot down 84% of the missiles that are in its range. The Kupol shoots down 84% of the missiles that the system estimates will hit homes.

                      Your dome is a large bubble advertised for the purpose of selling it. But the world understands this very well, therefore, it is not bought by more than one country in the world.
                      You should deal with him, since you bring his opinion.

                      To me personally, your Israeli experts ".... from the high bell tower." "Chew" each other will only get better.
                      You should deal with him, since you bring his opinion.

                      Absolutely two incomparable situations, we fought against international terrorism, while Israel carries out purely punitive actions aimed at destroying people who do not want to obey and accept the occupation of Palestinian land by the Israeli regime.
                      Children in Gaza are out of luck with geography. As in Grozny. Like in Donetsk

                      Children in Gaza, Donetsk and Lugansk were not "lucky" to find themselves there and there next to the Nazis in Ukraine and unscrupulous invaders in Israel.

                      Although I have already read such "nonsense" about LCD:
                      US and Israel may sell Iron Dome to Poland and Ukraine
                      In addition, in this case, the opportunity will open to sell the Iron Dome batteries to friendly countries such as Poland, Ukraine and South Korea, which have already shown interest in the Israeli missile defense system.
                      http://eajc.org/page16/news47966.html

                      But to date, no one has ever bought this "super-efficient" product and, most likely, will never buy it.
                      1. iv_v
                        0
                        8 May 2015 21: 31
                        advertised for the purpose of selling it

                        Poland, Ukraine and South Korea, which have already shown interest in the Israeli missile defense system

                        no one has ever bought this "super-efficient" product, and most likely will never buy


                        So far, they write, the Jews themselves do not have enough. ZhK is a specialized system, "sharpened", first of all, to intercept NURSs, with a range greater than the Buk. Few people have problems with NURS, and ZhK does not help much from aircraft and tactical missiles. Here Buk, for example, helps with airplanes, although it is unlikely to help from Grad.

                        Personally to me on your Israeli experts


                        Again. You give their opinion. It is inappropriate to put the speech of a "writer" on a technical topic. On the historical and patriotic - please. There sane people do not show themselves with their hands, only writers.

                        Absolutely two incomparable situations


                        (It seems that the wrong quote was copied). You're not right. The late Mr. Dudayev was not an "international terrorist". International terrorist are those who kill Americans like Mr. Tsarnaev. Hamas, by the way, is a member of this company. Those who kill mainly Russians, like Mr. Dudayev, are the Ichkerian rebels. By the way, he also said that he was fighting the invaders. All rebels are struggling with them, such a job. It is on this basis that the EU considers Hamas to be rebels, not terrorists.

                        found themselves next to fascists in Ukraine and unprincipled invaders in Israel


                        You are not entirely accurate. Not near, but at medium ranges. Children in the den of liquid fascism Dnepropetrovsk, like hundreds of thousands of Arab children in Israel, were much more fortunate. And yes, children are usually not lucky in those places where rebels hang out. Either a bad omen, or something.
                  2. +2
                    11 May 2015 18: 28
                    Do you know Arabs from Gaza? many of them are still quite flattering about the times of the Israeli mandate - there was work, medical care and social services. which is not now. and it seems that Israel is not installing PU in schools?
                    there was a dispute with friends from St. Petersburg - they attacked me, they say, why are they bombing Gaza? I asked them - let's just hypothetically (the "can't be" option is not accepted) let's imagine a group of "Karelian rebels" who suddenly start from the first Finnish border town to shoot St. Petersburg with NURS and demand independence (from whom? from what? it doesn't matter). what is the expected reaction from russia? fell silent, thoughtful. And what do you think ?
                    PS By the way, about "500 children" ... Hamas statistics are the most statistical in the world ... if anything ...
          3. 0
            11 May 2015 18: 15
            Yes, like Israel seems to be on the list of major lenders, and American help is seen as an interest-free loan
        2. +4
          8 May 2015 15: 51
          Quote: quilted jacket
          Previously, I read that the LCD spends on each missile partisans Hamas and Hezbollah, two missiles. How would you not mention it this way or not?
          Quote from publication:
          In the middle of the 2014 year, combat duty carried 9 batteries throughout Israel. By the end of 2014, more than 1000 missiles had been successfully shot down with Iron Dome batteries. The number of successfully intercepted targets is estimated at 85%.
          I do not have reliable information about the probability of being hit by a single missile, but it can be assumed from the text that it equals 0,85. It is logical that two anti-missiles are aimed at one BR.
          Quote: quilted jacket
          In addition, the spread of missiles, for example, Hamas, is so great that, at best, protected LCDs fly at best 1-2 missiles the rest anywhere but only not at a given object. Hence the myth of the high efficiency of the LCD.

          the fact is that the Israeli authorities pay very substantial compensation to the population in the event of damage from shelling, so that the JK is economically viable. I think a "professor" to whom many are so partial could tell in more detail about the Israeli missile defense system.
          PS The video is unfortunately not playing request
          1. 0
            8 May 2015 16: 02
            Quote: Bongo
            I do not have reliable information about the probability of being hit by a single missile, but it can be assumed from the text that it equals 0,85. It is logical that two anti-missiles are aimed at one BR.

            Maybe I asked a little wrong. I meant that for each Kassama they fire - TWO - with LCD missiles.
            PS The video is unfortunately not playing

            Strange it is reproducing.
            1. +1
              8 May 2015 16: 10
              Quote: quilted jacket
              Maybe I asked a little wrong. I meant that for each Kassama they fire - TWO - with LCD missiles.

              And there is Yes The video mentions the probability of 0,84 defeat. So when intercepting a single missile, a minimum of two anti-missiles is induced.
              The video was played but not the first time, Internet glitches ... request
              1. 0
                8 May 2015 16: 14
                Quote: Bongo
                So when firing a single missile - at least two missiles are induced.

                Thanks, now I understand. Two missile defense missiles on one cashier.
                1. +5
                  8 May 2015 16: 23
                  Quote: quilted jacket
                  Thanks, now I understand. Two missile defense missiles on one cashier.

                  Yes, in general, it is common practice to fire several anti-aircraft missiles at one target for a greater probability of defeat. In our S-300P air defense system, this firing mode is also used. In addition, in addition to the failure of guidance or a miss, there is always the possibility of failure of the interceptor missile. Of course, at first glance, the LCD is an absolutely economically disastrous system if we compare the cost of Kasams and interceptor missiles. But the Israelis deliberately go to this, after all, the material and image damage in the event of entering residential areas is even greater.
            2. 0
              11 May 2015 18: 35
              it seems like the s-300 also launches 2 missiles for 1 target?
        3. +2
          11 May 2015 18: 13
          the LCD system "weeds out" missiles that are supposed to fall on the "wasteland" and does not spend expensive missiles on them. the effectiveness was not calculated on the basis of all the missiles launched by Hezbollah, but only those that threatened cities and which were fired at. something like this
      2. iv_v
        +1
        8 May 2015 15: 54
        Quote: Bongo
        In my opinion, it was the US aggression against Yugoslavia and Iraq that in many respects provoked an increase in interest in medium and long-range air defense systems


        In France, Israel, Italy and the USA? Well, except in the sense of trading ...
        1. +5
          8 May 2015 16: 04
          Quote: iv_v
          In France, Israel, Italy and the USA? Well, except in the sense of trading ...

          Including... Yes But do not forget that the escalation of international tension has led many countries to acquire ballistic missiles as a "weapon of deterrence and retaliation."
          1. iv_v
            +1
            8 May 2015 16: 33
            Are you talking about North Korea, Iran and Pakistan? I suppose, the deterrence and retaliation in these cases, the United States is not particularly concerned, they all have closer to whom to crash.
        2. +2
          11 May 2015 18: 37
          Isn't Israel on the list? like ka regularly shelled (unlike the rest)
          1. iv_v
            0
            12 May 2015 10: 52
            Is this for my post? I also believe that Israel is shelling regardless of the escalation of international tension. There is always enough tension there.
  8. +2
    8 May 2015 17: 08
    So what is the role of air defense systems in the air defense system? It simply describes the history of creation and the current state of the air defense system. This, of course, is also interesting for professionals, as well as for amateur amateurs. Although experts really know more than that. After all, there are still many radio engineering parts in which the devil is buried.
    If an anti-aircraft missile flies hundreds of kilometers, the question arises - is it possible to intercept it and bring down another anti-aircraft missile launched by the opposing side, like an enemy aircraft. On the other hand, is it possible for her to attack, for example, another air defense system, an enemy air defense system? So we can get to the fighting - SAM against SAM.
    1. +1
      8 May 2015 23: 01
      "- is it possible to intercept and shoot it down with another anti-aircraft missile" ///

      Sure. In general, in recent years, the terms: missile defense, missile defense, missile explosives or
      OTs blur. There were light in weight, very maneuverable (turn around 180
      degrees) equipped with a multifunctional seeker rocket.
      They can be launched from anywhere and anywhere.
      For example, the BB Python-5 missile is successfully used as a missile launcher, and missile defense missile defense missiles
      remake for striking the ground.
      I foresee the appearance of large CR "queens", from which, on approaching the target, there will be
      launch small VZ missiles. Moreover, small missiles can successfully protect the "womb"
      from enemy rockets attacking her.
      1. iv_v
        0
        8 May 2015 23: 12
        Hard inserted.

        But why do I "foresee"? Such a thing has existed for a long time, it is called an attack drone. Unlike the described hypothetical missile, it is a returnable one. And protecting the CD from attacking enemy missiles is a strange fantasy. Defending an automatic kamikaze at a height of 30 meters? Discharging enemy missiles on himself is his minimum task. Those following him will carry out radars and launchers.
      2. +2
        9 May 2015 01: 23
        And what does it mean - a VZ rocket?
    2. iv_v
      +2
      8 May 2015 23: 45
      So we can get to the fighting - SAM against SAM


      Can not. This is obvious enough. Long-range air defense missiles have high speed, maneuverability, altitude and electrical bells and whistles, since they shoot down the most complex (small, high-speed, maneuvering, equipped with electronic warfare) targets. As a result, they are incomparably larger, more expensive and more complex than the ZZ missiles, while they have very modest characteristics by the standards of ZZ in terms of the range and weight of the warhead. Since there are no people willing to pay for the S-400 and throw the Hurricane warhead at the Tornado range, there are no ZZ warheads for such missiles.

      It is another matter if, say, our former North Atlantic friends need to urgently cut down the INF Treaty in view of, for example, Russia's foreign policy successes. Then screwing the Pershing warhead, say, to the CM-3 is a task that can be solved in a matter of months. The W85 warhead is just the right size. Only the anti-aircraft qualities of the missile will be lost in this case as unnecessary.
      1. +1
        9 May 2015 01: 21
        I will not say that I understand all your abbreviations. But I don’t see anything strange if I try to hit, for example, the Patriot or Taad antenna post with a S-400 rocket. Expensive? Maybe. But phased antennas are also expensive. Very expensive. And in order to find an antenna at a distance of 400 km - a lot of mind is needed in the head of a rocket - you must agree, as well as great energy to fly, and speed so that the rocket is not shot down. And a kickback is possible for the same reasons. In addition, it is possible to load specialized missiles for such attacks in advance, if they are foreseen. It's cheaper than losing planes with pilots.
        1. iv_v
          +1
          9 May 2015 01: 43
          Yes, hard.

          Anti-aircraft guided missile.
          Missile defense missile.
          Air to air.
          Air-to-ground (now they often write air-to-surface, i.e. including a ship).
          Earth to earth.
          Combat unit.
          Cruise missile.

          You see, the range of long-range air defense systems is also the range of rocket artillery and tactical missiles, which are incomparably cheaper and more numerous. And also easily find the radar according to intelligence. Yes, at least they will find on Googlemaps, the thing is noticeable. See pictures in the article. To put a long-range air defense system on the territory that the enemy can cover with AT-UMS / ATACMS - this must be a complete complete id and ot. Among citizens who have the opportunity to purchase such equipment - there are few.
        2. iv_v
          +2
          9 May 2015 02: 01
          you can pre-load specialized missiles in the SAM


          Can. Only this will not be an air defense system, since it cannot be recharged on the battlefield already. And it is possible to accompany the armor and the Torah for self-defense, and to protect it with ground weapons from the ground, because long-range air defense systems are clearly not the only weapons in the group. This is considered more reasonable, for some reason.
          1. 0
            9 May 2015 14: 53
            Only this will not be an air defense system, since it cannot be recharged on the battlefield already.

            Of course, I mean that some of the missiles can be specialized, and not all.
            Let them be cheap.
            To put a long-range air defense system on the territory that the enemy can cover with AT-UMS / ATACMS - this must be a complete complete id and ot.

            In places like St. Petersburg and the region, Murmansk, Kaliningrad, maybe Vladivostok, this will have to be done. For opponents - similarly: Tallinn, Helsinki, Vilnos, etc.
            1. iv_v
              +1
              9 May 2015 15: 11
              You should teach the materiel.

              The S-300 division has 80 missiles. For example, one tomahawk needs 2. But there are many tomahawks. But this division costs about $ 1 billion. Less missiles - more likely that the tomahawks will break through the missile defense and then you can already bomb for your own pleasure.

              So to cram point-U in the S-300 launcher (9A84) is technically not a problem at all. Shove it, hammer it on the sides with rags so that it does not fall out. Only there are no people who want to do this.

              I repeat for persistent. There is no need to waste the resources of air defense systems on rubbish. Countries with large air defense systems have simpler tactical missiles of the same range.
              1. -1
                9 May 2015 15: 40
                You should not give me advice. Look what an adviser.
                The fact that there are 300 missiles in the S-80 division is not a constitutional norm of the Russian Federation. How much is needed, so much must be included there. I talk about the prospects. And by the way, in what specific modification are they included 80? Enlighten if you are such an advanced connoisseur.
                1. iv_v
                  +2
                  9 May 2015 16: 40
                  OK, do not learn the materiel. You are right in something, it’s easier.

                  Google to the rescue.
            2. iv_v
              0
              9 May 2015 21: 21
              Not immediately cast a spell. And what did Helsinki not please? It is not even a member of NATO. Are there gays?
  9. 0
    9 May 2015 11: 52
    Quote: quilted jacket
    Thank you now it’s clear. Two missile defense missiles on one cashier.


    Already a relatively long time alone. After the modernization, which is constantly going on, this is one of the many improvements that went through the LCD. True, I don’t remember exactly the speech about the modernization of all LCDs or only part (new) ones.
    Of course, sometimes they launch two anti-missiles, but this mainly concerns situations where it’s not just about simple rockets like Kasam and Grad, but about missiles like J-80, R-160 M-302, Iranian faders and others, then there are missiles that are already quite expensive, better, fly further and suffer more damage, and of course, when they fly to the center of Israel, where a large number of people and important objects are concentrated.

    In any case, now, according to some estimates, 11-13 LCDs have already been built.
    They wrote about the imminent arrival of the 10th ZhK in July 2014. Yes, and during the last operation in Gaza, if I am not mistaken, 3 ZhK and 10th were supposed to become the 4th at once.

    And the larger the LC, the greater the coverage, the greater the chances of intercepting volley fire (although the LCD intercepted volleys and decent-there is a video of this and has already been given on this site) and the less missiles need to be launched.
  10. +2
    9 May 2015 19: 22
    Good review, informative! Continue on. Success!
  11. 0
    9 May 2015 20: 09
    The use of air defense missiles as tactical on the example of the Dvina s-75, it was possible that the complex included a special warhead with a nuclear charge, it was used to repel aerial attacks from the air and, in extreme cases, a shot could be fired at the ground, but it was definitely not good the essence was just a Nurs with a nuclear warhead. But it’s turned out to be better to hit the missiles with a carob, there was already an opportunity to direct a missile at a lacquer, and the incident with the American aircraft bridge in the Gulf of Tonki could not be accidental by launching a missile ...
    1. iv_v
      +3
      9 May 2015 21: 11
      Can I use the Igloo instead of the grenade launcher?

      Yes, probably you can. Only, for some reason, they usually don’t.
  12. 0
    10 May 2015 06: 08
    I read the article, and thought that about the development of Israel's missile defense, someone needs to write a separate article. Israeli citizens (coupled with American dollars) are taking leaps and bounds on missile defense.
    1. iv_v
      +2
      10 May 2015 16: 37
      Read the topic of air defense systems. Israel’s missile defense regularly includes articles and mega-doctors.

      In short, Israel has the opportunity to test its systems (primarily the C-RAM format) in combat conditions. Therefore, they are developing at the speed of wartime, not peace.
  13. 0
    11 May 2015 17: 57
    "Arrow" in English = "Hetz" (arrow) in Hebrew