Furious world beauty will not save! Top 10 Warships

126

"AT stories Maritime peoples have a long tradition concerning the aesthetics of the design of warships. In addition to its main role of warfare, warships served as a political tool for the effective projection of sea power, prestige and influence of the nation ... "

- Consultant at the US Navy Engineering Center Herbert A. Meier.

Designing a warship is a problem of arranging various payloads. In the process of designing, “lines of force” are born, uniting the visual composition of the object and projecting its force into the surrounding space. They are given by the lines of the frontal projection of the superstructures and the protrusion of the side, the size of the horizontal interval between the lines of the decks and superstructures, the height of the side, the longitudinal deflection of the hull.

Verticals contribute to making the object static, while the sloping lines from the visual center towards the bow and stern add dynamism to the silhouette. External perception of the appearance of the ship is determined by the degree of extension of its add-ons up and down, creating the overall impression of swiftness and readiness for action. The relatively large horizontal intervals between the lines of the decks and superstructures give rise to a feeling of cumbersome stability, while small ones emphasize the strength and dynamism of the ship. The power of the lines of force further enhances the slope of the surface of the ship and the stem.

Highlighting the criteria for analysis and examining the appearance of ships of various countries according to their methods, the specialists of the US Navy Engineering Center unanimously recognized the best Soviet shipbuilding school ... The Reds ships always differed by their unique charisma and the most sinister silhouette.

“A warship is an instrument of politics, chiefly weapons which is an effective belief. Aesthetic perfection strengthens the convincingness of a warship, reinforcing confidence in national politics. The appearance of Soviet warships was a conscious attempt to ensure the maximum propaganda effect of the application fleetthrough the use of artistic design style. ”

- G. Meyer, cont.

I bring to your attention a selection of the most beautiful surface warships covering the time interval over the last 70 years. The power, beauty and pride of all the fleets of the world.

10 Place - Teutonic Knight

Furious world beauty will not save! Top 10 Warships


The armored fat men did not like to be filmed in full face: their body, deeply planted in the water, with huge awkward boules, was visible. Disgusting view! The only of the battleships in whose appearance though the external swiftness remained at least a bit was the battlecruisers of the Scharnhorst type.

A long, relatively narrow body for its displacement, ending with a high “Atlantic” nose (it was just ending; the numbering of the frames from the Germans was conducted from the stern).

Glittering metal fire control blisters. The ominous shape of the towers of the main caliber, somewhat resembling a fascist helmet. And serving, along most of the length of the body, a strip of armor belt. All this made Scharnhorst and Gneisenau the most charismatic battleships whose hull lines confirm the seriousness of intentions.





9 place - “Misl Spunge” (missile catcher)

Hounds of the North Atlantic. The 50 series of Oliver H. Perry missile frigates, promising to be a reliable and cheap means of controlling maritime communications around the world. A sharp, swift bow in the waves, like a knife. Long solid superstructure. Two helicopter hangars and an elegant “one-armed bandit” in the nose of the hull (universal launcher Mk.13).



“Perry” reminds tea clippers of past eras. And its modern nickname is a reflection of the fact of the dismantling of all missile weapons. In its current form, the frigate is suitable only for chasing the boats of drug couriers, since no more serious tasks can not perform. What will happen to him in the event of an enemy attack? Missile Catcher.

However, this does not prevent the Perry from being a fantastically beautiful frigate.




8 place - Skinny American

Unlike the battleships of the epoch of “armor and steam”, the Ticonderoga missile cruiser, on the contrary, should be photographed exclusively from forward angles. In this case, the mass of the modern ship, in whose appearance lies the whole power of the Pentagon’s defense technologies, will soar in front of us.



The American is proud of her graceful bow with a 40-meter bulwark. But it is necessary to change the angle - and a gangly barge decorated with 83 antennas will appear before us. Dirty exterior “Tikonderogi” complement the two huge “tower”, on the walls of which are hung grille.






7 Place - Pyramid

The most modern warship, subtle rocket-artillery destroyer "Zamvolt". The floating pyramid in height with the 16-storeyed house opened a new era in the history of the fleet. An era of amazing layout and bold technical solutions.



Everything is unusual here - from the strange blockage of the sides to the inclined bow-breakwater, which resembles the form of the destroyers of the Russian-Japanese war. Extremely large, high-tech destroyer, whose appearance fully reflects the technical advantage and ambitions of the country in which this ship was built.



6 place - “Golden Eagle”

A masterpiece of domestic shipbuilding. The mighty cruiser, surpassing any of its foreign peers for a whole decade (1970-80).



The large anti-submarine ship of the 1134B project “Berkut-B” (also known by the name of the lead ship, “Nikolaev”) is impressive in the number of weapons and antenna posts installed on it. Four anti-aircraft missile systems supported by the power of anti-submarine weapons and aids were able to accommodate in a modest but surprisingly elegant case with a displacement of 8 thousand tons.

According to analysts of the US Navy, the large anti-submarine ship (BOD) “Nikolaev” made an impression of the “Superstructure-ready fighter” Superstructure and cruiser hull “showed consistent and targeted lines of force”.



5 place - “Remove”

Swan song of the Soviet shipbuilding. The large anti-submarine ships of the 1155 project, which replaced the “Golden Eagles”, have become a worthy continuation of the class of Soviet destroyers with hypertrophied anti-submarine weapons.



The BOD Ave. 1155 “Deleted” deservedly fall into this list for the unbearably beautiful curves of their body lines. The impression is reinforced by the traditional, for Soviet ships, layout with the placement of a large number of weapons on the upper deck.



4 place - “Orlan”

Atomic giant with a monumental appearance.



What was this ship built for? Even the creators of Orlan don't know the answer to this question. Jam-packed with rockets, he continues to plow the seas, inspiring horror and awe at “likely adversaries”.

In the 250-meter case of TARKR there is not a single free space where a rocket, gun or radar would not be installed. However, due to its outstanding size, the Orlan, unlike the Golden Eagles, does not seem to be overloaded with weapons. On the contrary, the perspective layout with the placement of weapons in the under-deck space gives the cruiser a polite and noble look.





3 place - “Nimitz”

100 thousand tons of diplomacy. A grand floating airfield with a side height of over 20 meters. All this is an ominous fusion of marine and aviation technology, amazing observer for its size.



The largest warship in the history of mankind, an aircraft carrier of the Nimitz type, exceeded all permissible limits in terms of dimensions and cost. At the same time, his noble posture and magnificence turned out to be so strong that they are able to sow panic in the media all over the world.





2 place - Her Majesty's War Dragon

The famous pirate and murderer Sir Francis Drake argued that the best emblem for a warship is the corpse of the enemy nailed to the stem. The stem of a new British destroyer is decorated with a red Welsh dragon. Symbol of the integrity and security of the protected object.



The beautiful “Daring” broke all the stereotypes about modern destroyers. The look defines its essence. Inside the tall pyramids hides an unprecedented set of tools to control the airspace.





1 place. Remains free!

Everyone who is fascinated by the theme of the Navy, has its own ideas about the beauty of warships. I invite all readers to express their opinions in the comments!

126 comments
Information
Dear reader, to leave comments on the publication, you must sign in.
  1. +13
    April 27 2015 05: 58
    The Italian cruisers of World War II are also very beautiful.
    1. +25
      April 27 2015 09: 52
      "Every time," the captain of the 1st rank of the US Navy Garry Alendorfer, the captain of the 1977st rank of the US Navy, sadly reflects, "when you enter a foreign port and cannot immediately see the state flags on the masts of the ships standing there, choose the most beautiful, clean and well-groomed of them. In nine out of ten cases, you will not be mistaken - it will be Russian ships. "I copied this quote into my notebook in 204 during my service (I don’t remember the source, it seems from Anatoly Elkin’s book" Atomic Leaves on Alarm ", written about the formation of the Soviet submarine nuclear fleet). This list should have included the IPC of project 1124 - handsome, IPC of project XNUMX.
      1. The comment was deleted.
      2. The comment was deleted.
      3. +21
        April 27 2015 12: 37
        As they say: evaluate the difference.
        Both look gorgeous .... but ours is somehow more formidable or something))))
        1. 0
          1 May 2015 13: 24
          Yes, and more weapons will be.
    2. +5
      April 27 2015 12: 24
      I agree that Italians are extremely strong in design. But in power and simple open strength, I suppose there is no equal to our "Peter the Great", even the vaunted "Dering" did not stand nearby (and did not walk a mile).
      1. +6
        April 27 2015 16: 33
        First place! good
  2. +25
    April 27 2015 06: 05
    As for me, Soviet-era ships are the most beautiful from an aesthetic point of view ...
    1. +23
      April 27 2015 09: 05
      Quote: Hagakure
      Soviet ships are the most beautiful
      I also like them very much, it’s not even clear what the NATO and German troughs are doing in the TOP 10. But aren't Russians beautiful? IMHO corvette project 20380 is very cute.
      1. +13
        April 27 2015 09: 30
        You have the wrong angle!

        Here he is, in full splendor -
      2. +1
        April 27 2015 10: 34
        And what is bad about the cruiser "Moskva" (board No. 121)?
        1. +5
          April 27 2015 14: 10
          Quote: zubkoff46
          And what is bad about the cruiser "Moskva" (board No. 121)?
          It’s not bad at all, it’s just that the modern Russian ships also have a good design.
      3. +10
        April 27 2015 18: 09
        Quote: enot73
        I also like them very much, it’s not even clear what the NATO and German troughs are doing in TOP 10 ...


        You mean you have not seen what the present trough fellow

        USS Long Beach Floating Nuclear Stand (CGN-9)

        1. +4
          April 27 2015 21: 13
          Appearance futuristic, for an amateur

          But this is 1959, the world's first nuclear-powered missile cruiser with three anti-aircraft systems, one of which hit 180 km (incredible Talos air defense system)



          A radar with a phased array was first installed on the cruiser. Huge antenna arrays were mounted on the walls of the superstructure, which created such an unusual, "box-shaped" appearance



          By the way, he served until the year 1995, after modernization he became generally handsome

          As if wholly cast from metal, transom feed. Far visible armored boxes with Tomahawks
  3. +2
    April 27 2015 06: 42
    I like corvettes
  4. +10
    April 27 2015 06: 43
    clearly prettier Zamvolt's iron
    1. +2
      April 27 2015 11: 21
      For Futurism 1. Visby 2 Zumvalt 3. Gorshkov 4.Coronado
      50-90 ships must be evaluated separately
      battleships also separately
      Well, sailing ships must be a separate rating
    2. +4
      April 27 2015 11: 23
      Swedes created beauties
      1. +6
        April 27 2015 13: 24
        Well, at least kill me, I don’t like all these stealths. They are bulky tall and generally bandura. There is no swiftness and predation of a warship.
        1. +5
          April 28 2015 01: 50
          Very reminiscent of: 1) floating sheds, 2) icebergs (only penguins are not enough) laughing
  5. +23
    April 27 2015 06: 47
    The eagles were created as ships that must fight as part of warrants with American AUGs. The author about the misunderstanding of the creators of the Eagles themselves, for which they are clearly bent. But thanks for the photo shoot. Interesting.
  6. +3
    April 27 2015 07: 02
    I didn’t understand, but where is 1164 ?!
    1. +8
      April 27 2015 07: 13
      Quote: denssss
      I didn’t understand, but where is 1164 ?!

      Duc to see a hint did not understand. Oleg began with a photo of Atlanta and left the first place to choose ... which is not obvious to everyone ...
  7. +4
    April 27 2015 07: 04
    In the first place I offer the battleship Marat, nee Petropavlovsk. After modernization, his appearance
    became not certain, but I like it!
  8. +8
    April 27 2015 07: 04
    I noticed that Soviet / Russian weapons (Everything, not just ships) are really beautiful. Regarding this article - my opinion - 1st place is uniquely "Orlan".
  9. +11
    April 27 2015 07: 10
    http://topwar.ru/uploads/images/2015/300/zjmx845.jpg
    Here is my winner - Richelieu!
    Beautiful ship !!!
    1. 0
      April 27 2015 17: 11
      Quote: Rurikovich
      Here is my winner - Richelieu!
      Beautiful ship !!!

      Leader "Tashkent", Black Sea, heroic, "Blue Cruiser".
      Built, by the way, in Italy ...

      The picture can be enlarged.





      1. +2
        April 27 2015 22: 27
        Quote: BDRM 667
        Built, by the way, in Italy ...
        Soviet destroyers of Project 7 were also practically Italian design.
        1. 0
          April 28 2015 10: 54
          I wanted about them ... But you got ahead.
  10. +3
    April 27 2015 07: 12
    In my opinion, this top should have the destroyer pr.956, and according to the second world French LKR Dunkirk and LK Richelieu look certainly not worse than Teuton.
    Well, the first place is probably Atlant.
  11. +7
    April 27 2015 07: 13
    Yamato. It turned out to be useless, but damn threatening and handsome.
    1. +3
      April 28 2015 09: 41
      Quote...
      Yamato. It turned out to be useless, but damn threatening and handsome.

      Well, a photo of him to the heap! hi
  12. +5
    April 27 2015 07: 21
    The cruiser Varyag is good !!!
  13. +3
    April 27 2015 07: 33
    Also good and beautiful ...
    1. +11
      April 27 2015 09: 35
      Quote: inkass_98
      Also good and beautiful ...

      The main thing is not to remove the battleship in front

      greasy hog, it's not completely sitting in the water
  14. +5
    April 27 2015 07: 33
    Ships of the last century had their own unique chic! In modern ships, functionality rules the style.
  15. +15
    April 27 2015 07: 53
    1st place - remains free

    Tempter ... Is it possible on Monday? Work in bulk, and here ...
    Ready to divide the first place among modern ships between three ships:
    Of our undoubtedly BOD “Admiral Chabanenko” (950)

    Japanese missile destroyer Akizuki DD-115

    And as if acting in a different weight category USS America (LHA-6)

    Being on the list of such a monster as USS America (LHA-6) may not be entirely justified, but I like it ...
    1. +2
      April 27 2015 12: 56
      About "Chabanenko" - I fully support
    2. +1
      April 27 2015 17: 20
      Quote: Nayhas
      Being on the list of such a monster as USS America (LHA-6) may not be entirely justified, but I like it ...

      It looks like a Mistral from this perspective ...
    3. +2
      April 27 2015 18: 17
      Quote: Nayhas
      And as if speaking in a different weight category ...


      Everyone forgot about the trifle, small but toothy missile boats of the Chilean Navy.

      1. +1
        April 28 2015 09: 45
        Quote...
        Everyone forgot about the trifle, small but toothy missile boats of the Chilean Navy.

        By the way, yes! It is not at all necessary that someone huge and majestic would take 1st place! hi
  16. 0
    April 27 2015 07: 55
    Strange rating. 8,9,7,4,2 places are very difficult to call handsome. As well as rendered in the title 1164. Number 7 - generally ugliness of the highest degree! In this case, I would definitely put in this rating BOD project 61.
    1. +1
      April 27 2015 07: 56
      Quote: Alex_59
      Strange rating. 8,9,7,4,2 places are very difficult to call handsome. As well as rendered in the title 1164. Number 7 - generally ugliness of the highest degree! In this case, I would definitely put in this rating BOD project 61.

      The most important is who is "numerically uno" and here Oleg gives everyone the opportunity to speak, so put forward your own version ...
    2. +5
      April 27 2015 08: 29
      Quote: Alex_59
      Number 7 - generally ugliness of the highest degree!

      What is ugly in it?

      Mysticism and futurism, a clear silhouette, minimalism in external details
      "Zamvolt" as if it came from the future



      1. +7
        April 27 2015 11: 46
        The design was dangling from the French industrial designer Philippe Starck. Blohm + Voss shipyard. It is simply called "A". Ordered in 2004 and since 2008 on the water. Its owner, Andrey Melnichenko, pays about $ 20.000.000 a year for its maintenance.
        What the funniest search on this image in google gives- Zumvalt
      2. +2
        April 27 2015 21: 11
        Only serial ships need to be represented.
        1. jjj
          +1
          April 27 2015 22: 50
          Pictures with the appearance of DDG 1000 were published at the end of the last century. Truth in proportions deceived
  17. +14
    April 27 2015 08: 04
    And I like our "Kuzya"
    1. mileo73
      0
      1 May 2015 17: 56
      Yes, Kuznetsov is graceful !!!!!
  18. +9
    April 27 2015 08: 04
    I was aboard one of six Australian frigates of the Oliver Hazard Perry class during his visit to our Adelaide. It actually looks pretty unpresentable. Quite a small boat, there is nothing formidable or intimidating in it, the location of the main weapon seemed strange. Generally very weakly armed. Some special not even "fantastic" beauty did not notice. The Russian "Gorshkov" does not look like an example more solid, although perhaps this comparison is not entirely correct, after all, the ships are divided by a whole generation, at least 25 years.
  19. +7
    April 27 2015 08: 06
    7 place - Zwolt is a rare freak! How did he get into the top of beautiful ships?

    And about Ticonderoga it is somehow poorly written - a beautiful ship. And about battleships, too, it’s not very good - on the contrary, I like the front view of the battleships.
    1. +9
      April 27 2015 08: 26
      Quote: -Dmitry-
      7 place - Zwolt is a rare freak! How did he get into the top of beautiful ships?

      Zamvolt has only one drawback - it is American

      Wonderful, in every way, the ship. A masterpiece of futurism, a huge floating pyramid with a bow tilted back

  20. +6
    April 27 2015 08: 07
    if you shoot in dynamics - many, even the most modest ships, look handsome. Pictured: The French frigate Latouche Treville transforms from an ugly duckling into a real swan.
    Therefore, the Zumvolt's box at the pier does not evoke any aesthetic emotions, while the Visby, running along the waves, evokes.
    1. +8
      April 27 2015 10: 29
      Quote: Tlauicol
      Pictured: The French frigate Latouche Treville transforms from an ugly duckling into a real swan.

      And how is he against the background of his great-grandfather?


      The frigate Latouche-Tréville D646 escorts the outgoing replica (launched in 2012) of the Germiona frigate, in which General Lafayette arrived in the New World in 1780 to participate in the War of Independence on the side of the colonists.
  21. +3
    April 27 2015 08: 07
    Definitely "Udaloy" - he is like a Su-27 among aircraft, ideal lines - in each of them beauty and tension.
    Atlas, of course, has a toothy appearance, but the Daredevil is more beautiful.
  22. 0
    April 27 2015 08: 16
    And really what was the Orlan built for? I, of course, was not in the head of the designers, but a bunch of air defense systems and anti-ship missiles seem to hint that his task is to drown such unloved comrades. Kaptsov aircraft carriers, or at least their air wings. Atlanta is doing the same.
    1. -3
      April 27 2015 08: 57
      Quote: EvilLion
      And really what was the Orlan built for?

      In general, I thought of it as a BOD with AEU, but it turned out something unimaginable ... the creators themselves had no idea what they were creating and why ...
      1. +4
        April 27 2015 14: 59
        If you do not have a clue why anti-aircraft and anti-ship missiles are needed, this does not mean that the creators do not.
  23. +2
    April 27 2015 08: 16
    Beauty as a projection of strength, advanced achievements and something else from the golden triangle, and individual preferences of each, is very difficult.
    The most powerful Nimitz / Ohio, the most advanced - Zamwolt, and the beauty in them - the cat cried. Maybe Bismarck / Tirpitz in profile.
    1. 0
      April 28 2015 09: 50
      Quote...
      Maybe Bismarck / Tirpitz in profile.

      Very, very "presentable" by the way! hi
  24. +13
    April 27 2015 08: 35
    But what about this beauties, one of the most beautiful ships of our time, for my taste.
    1. +2
      April 27 2015 08: 38
      From a different angle
      1. The comment was deleted.
    2. +1
      April 27 2015 08: 43
      and another perspective
    3. +2
      April 27 2015 10: 10
      Definitely the first place, I also wanted to lay it out good
    4. +1
      April 27 2015 19: 29
      I agree. Such a laconic sophisticated design came out. Excellent proportions, swift silhouette.
    5. 0
      April 30 2015 11: 42
      Oh, damn phone, constantly letting me down, of course "Handsome", you yourself also need to be more careful ..
  25. -5
    April 27 2015 08: 43
    Her Majesty's Fleet!

    1. jjj
      +1
      April 27 2015 22: 53
      The British deck is covered with a dark anti-slip coating. They really do not mop the decks. And walking during a storm is safer. Well, the truth is now everything is like in a submarine inside the hull and superstructures. The tavern on the forecastle can not be corrupted
  26. The comment was deleted.
  27. +2
    April 27 2015 08: 48
    I do not quite understand how topography is determined and who is topical. In my opinion, this top 10 is holy random
    1. +1
      April 27 2015 21: 13
      Quote: tchoni
      I do not quite understand how topography is determined

      Elementary - by the addictions of the author.
  28. The comment was deleted.
  29. +3
    April 27 2015 08: 53
    There is no ship worse than the Oliver Perry. In this he is a champion. The Ticonderoga-class cruisers were also not far from him. The Soviet ships made me happy. All our shipbuilders knew how to combine strength and beauty.
    1. +1
      April 27 2015 09: 26
      Quote: Artyom25
      There is no ship worse than the Oliver Perry. In this he is a champion.

      What is this?

      vintage masterpiece from the 70's




      you have a biased attitude towards America
  30. +6
    April 27 2015 08: 56
    Here is also a good instance

    1. +3
      April 27 2015 09: 23
      Singapore Fomedebel (optional - "Kang Ding" of the Taiwanese Navy)

      Both - the development of the French stealth frigate "Lafayette"



  31. 3axap
    +1
    April 27 2015 08: 58
    Author Oleg Kaptsov +++++++. Thank you for the photo shoot. On Monday morning, and such beauties. And also thanks for the provocation towards the members of the forum. How subtly he divided everyone who was not indifferent to the fleet. All the members of the forum were off for your comments. and love of the sea. hi From the land worm. But the baskets are really beautiful. hi
  32. +17
    April 27 2015 09: 04
    As for me, from the point of view of a seaman, all ships are living creatures and they are beautiful, each in its own way. A sailor cannot help but love his ship, his house.
    The discussion is not very correct, because the taste and color of all the markers are different, and the ship, like a person, has favorable and unfavorable angles for shooting. This is like women, like all normal men, but everyone has different preferences.
  33. +6
    April 27 2015 09: 10
    Yes, the rating clearly lacks battleships. Moreover, the article belongs to Comrade. Kaptsova. laughing
    The introductory part about the projection of force and the other and the other with quotes by G. Mayer is taken from a long-standing article in which the Americans tried to understand why the Soviet warships outwardly absolutely devoted their American counterparts. The authors accepted as a fact that the Russian ships look more beautiful, stronger, more impressive, more powerful, faster, and tried to explain to themselves the reasons for such external superiority. As a result, they revealed a certain set of design principles that were characteristic of the Soviet school of shipbuilding in the second half of the XNUMXth century, which distinguished its offspring so favorably.
    Why am I writing all this: if you approach the rating presented here from the point of view of G. Mayer's theory, half of the ships represented in it should be excluded from it. US-British half.
    As for the Scharnhorst type LKR: I agree, the ship is beautiful. But here it is more correct to consider the German shipbuilding program of the 30s. as a whole, consistently giving the Reich "Eugens", "Scharnhorst" and "Bismarck". The silhouettes of all three types are similar, but "Bismarck" in this chain is the crown and the pinnacle of development, and therefore "the best". I would point to him, not Scharnhorst.
    1. -7
      April 27 2015 09: 16
      Quote: netslave
      "Bismarck" in this chain is the crown and peak of development

      Bismarck t @ lstozhop
      disgusting

      1. +4
        April 27 2015 09: 43
        All LC, as you put it, are fat asses. A stable artillery platform should be wide enough.
        1. -3
          April 27 2015 09: 49
          Quote: netslave
          A stable artillery platform should be wide enough.

          Well, here we are talking about beauty

          LK, alas, do not pull
          1. +4
            April 27 2015 10: 12
            Beauty is relative. In my opinion pull, and how.
            1. jjj
              +1
              April 27 2015 22: 55
              It's just that these ships were shot on a long focus. It turns out optical illusion. And shoot a wide angle - slender
      2. +7
        April 27 2015 14: 12
        Well, yes, well, yes, the Bismarck is disgusting, and the Zumwalt is beautiful!
        Brilliant battleship, look at its lateral projection!
        AND STAFF IRON !!!
        It's like comparing Malevich's Black Square and Aivazovsky's paintings ...
        Choose the correct projection (this does not apply to "Zamvolt", no matter how you look - IRON) and you will be happy.
        Everything is sad for you with the concept of beauty and aesthetics ...
      3. +2
        April 28 2015 10: 28
        Quote: SWEET_SIXTEEN
        Bismarck t @ lstozhop
        disgusting

        Association.
    2. +6
      April 27 2015 09: 37
      Quote: netslave
      The authors accepted as a fact that the Russian ships look more beautiful, stronger, more impressive, more powerful, faster, and tried to explain to themselves the reasons for such external superiority

      I note that Mayer took Project 1134B as a basis, which is truly a masterpiece from an aesthetic point of view. It will not be spoiled by any angle. It should be put in the first place. Next to him, "Udalaya" looks like a clumsy bloated monster with a hypertrophied nose. Of the amerskih ships, the most beautiful EM "Spryuens", which did not receive the author's attention at all. And such freaks as "Zamwalt" and "Daring" can only be liked by fans of the "Black Square" and Cubism. It is good that there were no littoral ships from the USA and Sweden.
      1. +4
        April 27 2015 09: 54
        Quote: Silhouette
        Of the amerskih ships, the most beautiful EM "Spruens", which did not receive the author's attention at all.

        Quote: Silhouette
        And such freaks as "Zamwalt" and "Daring" can only be liked by fans of "Black Square" and Cubism.

        Well, whoever had a bust with Cubism was destroyers like Spruins ...
        I believe the shipbuilders were terribly happy to build them, all the way straight and perpendicular ...
        1. 0
          April 27 2015 10: 12
          At "Spruens", straight lines of superstructures are harmoniously combined with an elegant hull and do not spoil the impression of harmony of the whole appearance of the ship. Cubism is not straight lines, it is something else. This is when a woman is drawn with squares, triangles and rhombuses (Picasso)
  34. The comment was deleted.
  35. +1
    April 27 2015 09: 27
    The first place rightfully belongs to Orlan
    1. +3
      April 27 2015 09: 39
      Quote: Arctidian
      The first place rightfully belongs to Orlan

      Or maybe "North Carolina"?))


    2. +4
      April 27 2015 18: 30
      Quote: Arctidian
      The first place rightfully belongs to Orlan


      Net !!! tongue

      fellow

  36. +9
    April 27 2015 09: 34
    In my opinion a beautiful ship patrolman pr.1135
    "Okay" and its name is appropriate.

    The article is in the good traditions of VO and is written well, thanks to the author.
    1. +4
      April 27 2015 09: 59
      Quote: saturn.mmm
      In my opinion a beautiful ship patrolman pr.1135

      PSKR pr.11351 will be more beautiful. I saw Menzhinsky live in Nakhodka, I was very impressed ...
      1. +2
        April 27 2015 11: 29
        Quote: Nayhas
        PSKR pr.11351 will be more beautiful. I saw Menzhinsky live in Nakhodka, I was very impressed ...

        My dream is to visit Kamchatka.
        Beautiful ship and shot from a good angle.
        There is a photo, TFR pr.11540 "Fearless".
        Hawk surrounded by American cruisers.
      2. gjv
        0
        12 May 2015 17: 53
        Quote: Nayhas
        PSKR pr.11351 will be more beautiful. I saw Menzhinsky live in Nakhodka, I was very impressed ...

        Only this Getman Sagaidachny Navy of Ukraine.
        Here is PSKR "Menzhinsky".

  37. +3
    April 27 2015 09: 42
    Only Yamato claims to be 1st place and no one else is able to take this place !!!
  38. Clone
    +3
    April 27 2015 09: 54
    For me, the land explorer, the Americans were not standing next to our ships.
  39. +1
    April 27 2015 10: 11
    "Orlan". Crammed full of missiles, he continues to plow the seas, terrifying and awe of “probable opponents”.
    There is not a single free space in the TARKR 250-meter building where no rocket, gun or radar was installed.


    Why carry ballast? drinks
  40. Bombardier
    0
    April 27 2015 10: 12
    Gracious theme! How many people how many opinions! Nice to read both the article and the comments!
    Who else would write about the underwater "giants". - their beauty is no less attractive.
  41. +6
    April 27 2015 10: 15
    I would also add frigate 11356, not as handsome as "Gorshkov" but still
  42. +4
    April 27 2015 10: 17
    I personally find it strange that they included "Tikanderogu" and "Peri", but passed "Worley Burke".
    Of course everything tastes and color, but the superstructure perpendicular to the deck looks somehow bulky and stupid.
    In general, I am a fan of stealth lines and silhouettes. I am for our modern 22350 and 20380. BUT, despite the stealth, I still consider the "Eagles" to be the pinnacle of shipbuilding.
  43. +12
    April 27 2015 10: 46
    The cruiser "Aurora" is very beautiful good

    Like the Varyag aircraft carrier sold to the Chinese

    Vikmaditya sold to India

    I also like "Cosmonaut Yuri Gagarin", although he is not a military one.
  44. +2
    April 27 2015 10: 52
    A beautiful view of the cruiser "Sverdlov"
    1. +3
      April 27 2015 19: 15
      That's about the cruisers of the 68th project really undeservedly forgot
  45. +2
    April 27 2015 11: 03
    The avionic cruiser Admiral Kuznetsov has a little secret. Super secret military secret. However, the Americans know her, we do not. If a carrier-based fighter is 100% loaded with rockets and bombs, and a full tank of fuel is filled, it will not take off. The reason is a springboard. In this case, you need a catapult, like the Americans. Also, the ship is relatively small and rocks it decently. The Americans, by the way, specifically criticize their nuclear-powered aircraft carriers, but continue to build them so that we fall for their trick and build an expensive ship that does not fulfill its tasks as an aircraft carrier. This was done on purpose. The springboard is a sabotage.
    1. 0
      April 27 2015 14: 39
      Springboard is of course an anachronism .. Then I agree
  46. +5
    April 27 2015 11: 05
    I'm crazy about Novik type destroyers !!!
  47. +5
    April 27 2015 11: 17
    Here he is handsome !!!!! Battleship "TSESAREVICH" !!!
  48. +1
    April 27 2015 11: 20
    Handsome man! 956 is good.
    1. +2
      April 27 2015 14: 39
      By far the most definitive is the destroyer of project 956 Sarych. Live with a dark ball color is just something.
      1. +1
        April 27 2015 18: 57
        Quote: 1c-inform-city
        Handsome man! 956 is good.

        Quote: Pauls_77
        By far the most definitive is the 956 Sarych project destroyer.

        According to the brother-sailor who served in the Northern Fleet and according to his colleagues, the 956 project “Sarych” is the most beautiful and elegant warship in the world, a predator, a sea cheetah, a true fighter ...
  49. +3
    April 27 2015 11: 29
    Probably the most beautiful ship is the destroyer Novik
  50. +3
    April 27 2015 11: 46
    "Arlie Burke" looks more familiar and proportional to "Ticonderoga".
  51. +3
    April 27 2015 11: 50
    Perhaps OUR ALL! Pyotr Alekseevich looks from above and rejoices.
  52. +1
    April 27 2015 12: 01
    First place is definitely the Project 1164 cruiser Atlant. The most beautiful ship and the deadliest.
  53. 0
    April 27 2015 12: 53
    Quote: Nayhas
    Well, whoever had a bust with Cubism was destroyers like Spruins ...
    I believe the shipbuilders were terribly happy to build them, all the way straight and perpendicular ...

    What can you say about the cruiser Long Beach?) There is a large “bedside table” on the hull.)
  54. +1
    April 27 2015 13: 09
    There are so many people, so many opinions, everyone agrees on one thing: the Soviet-Russian school of shipbuilding created VERY beautiful ships. For my taste, there are also Italian cruisers of World War II and modern Japanese destroyers.
  55. 0
    April 27 2015 13: 16

    Bismarck t @ lstozhop
    disgusting

    I have a Bismarck in 1/200 right in front of my eyes - and it looks very chic)
    In addition to Bismarck, I would also add the Iowa Sisterships here. but American frigates (I associate them with floating sheds request ) I would remove it altogether. I also don’t understand what is the beauty of the Nimitz - they, frigates and aircraft carriers - contradict the introductory remarks)
  56. 0
    April 27 2015 13: 25
    The sailboats are all beautiful. Why not build a small patrol ship to patrol distant waters? For example, Cousteau had the ship "Halcion". Provide a drone and provide all living conditions for a small crew.
  57. +4
    April 27 2015 14: 13
    Sorry, for some reason I couldn’t find a photo of “Mercury” :-(
    1. 0
      April 27 2015 17: 51
      Quote: litus
      Sorry, for some reason I couldn’t find a photo of “Mercury” :-(


      And, alas, you won’t find it. But the ship called “Memory of Mercury” will definitely be part of our fleet one way or another. An example for posterity!
    2. gjv
      0
      12 May 2015 18: 22
      Quote: litus
      Sorry, for some reason I couldn’t find a photo of “Mercury” :-(

      Quote: Jon_ Quiet
      And, alas, you won’t find it. But the ship called “Memory of Mercury” will definitely be part of our fleet one way or another. An example for posterity!

      The cruiser "Memory of Mercury" in Sevastopol on the roadstead

  58. 0
    April 27 2015 14: 16
    An article from the category of comparing soft with warm.
  59. -1
    April 27 2015 14: 25
    In many ways, one can argue with the author of the article and his choice. But there is no arguing about tastes. I personally (and by far and not only me) outwardly most like the ships on which I personally served: BOD pr. 61 and SKR pr. 1135. But the main thing in the beauty of a ship is not its shape and architecture or the main dimensions. They are always determined by the combat purpose of the ship. And every sailor who loves naval service considers his ship the most beautiful. And the beauty of a ship is determined by its well-groomed, smart crew and zealous adherence to ship rules, the beauty of mooring and performing evolutions at sea, the ability to perfectly control their weapons and military equipment. There are no other definitions and there cannot be. Therefore, I consider this article simply a slap at the sailors, for which I give it a big minus.
  60. 0
    April 27 2015 14: 40
    Everyone who is fascinated by the theme of the Navy, has its own ideas about the beauty of warships. I invite all readers to express their opinions in the comments!
    Any ship is beautiful in its beauty, but in addition to beauty, warships must also have functionality. What's the point of talking about the beauty of its contours if the ship, after firing a salvo, cannot turn sharply off course (sailors will understand). What is the use of an aircraft-carrying squadron that, having released its planes, cannot receive them onto a torn deck?
    I'm not against beautiful ships, but they should be functional...IMHO.
  61. Yaroslav
    0
    April 27 2015 14: 43
    The most beautiful ships are ours USSR times. I would like to mention SKR pr. 1135 and Atlant.
    1. Yaroslav
      0
      April 27 2015 15: 20
      I was mistaken: not “Atlant”, but “Orlan”. If we're going to prioritize)
  62. 0
    April 27 2015 15: 47
    The topic is interesting. But (IMHO) the aesthetics of ship silhouettes are best considered in different time categories:
    From the time of WW2, my championship (only in terms of external beauty (without performance characteristics)) goes to the leading Italian destroyers!
    And if we take the end of the last century and the current ones: of ours, except for the BOD Project 1134, the TFR Project 1135 was elegant and well-designed!
  63. +2
    April 27 2015 16: 03
    The German heavy cruiser Prinz Eugen looks beautiful:
  64. +6
    April 27 2015 16: 52
    Peter the Great 1st Place!!!!
  65. 0
    April 27 2015 17: 48
    I definitely don't agree with the second place...
  66. +4
    April 27 2015 18: 31
    Of course, I understand that everyone’s taste and color are different. But to call “Oliver Hazard Perry”, “Ticonderoga” and even more so “Zamvolt” beautiful is, as Matroskin the Cat said, too much!
    For me, this ship is truly beautiful - the nuclear cruiser "Peter the Great":
  67. +1
    April 27 2015 20: 07
    Quote: VohaAhov
    Probably the most beautiful ship is the destroyer Novik

    Destroyers, in general, are for the most part beautiful ships. I really like the Flame-class destroyers. This is where harmony and rationality come in one bottle.
  68. 0
    April 27 2015 20: 52
    Why evaluate? Miss Ship 2015...or what?
    There is nothing dearer to any sailor than his ship. Or the first...
    ...
    Thanks to everyone who took part in the discussion. Because such a selection needs to be collected and climbed separately.
    And here it’s simple - take it and keep it.
    And admire the variable desktop background.
    ...
    I’ll just ask you - will you work for me?
    ...
    And thanks to Oleg Kaptsov. For a great topic.
  69. 0
    April 27 2015 21: 56
    Quote: ametist415
    The reason is the springboard. In this case, you need a catapult, like the Americans. Also, the ship is relatively small and rocks quite well. The Americans, by the way, specifically criticize their nuclear aircraft carriers, but continue to build them so that we fall for their trick and build an expensive ship that does not fulfill its tasks as an aircraft carrier. This was done on purpose. A springboard is a diversion.

    That's it, I crawled under the table... don't pull me out of there until they invent a steam catapult capable of working in Northern latitudes...
  70. 0
    April 28 2015 00: 19
    And I like this one:
  71. Granatkin
    +1
    April 28 2015 00: 43
    For me, the most beautiful ship is the one that raised the signal, which is indicated by three flags - “Hat” (Sh), “Live” (W) and “Az” (A). This is a different type of beauty. Elegant contour lines and the power of any type of weapon fade in front of him. The adversaries surrender before this beauty of spirit!!! And they are very scared!!!!

    PS The most remarkable thing is that the fleets of other states have never had a complete semantic analogue.
  72. 0
    April 28 2015 02: 37
    I was very upset that everyone forgot this wonderful ship, and in all respects it deserves one of the first places, and not all those lousy scumbags!

    (The picture is greatly enlarged!)
    1. 0
      April 28 2015 04: 13
      don’t forget))))))))) I wrote a comment, but its functionality raises doubts, especially the lack of at least shields on deck 152 canoes.
    2. +1
      April 28 2015 06: 41
      biased comment.
      The Zamvolts are lousy, but the Varyag (the same American cruiser) is wonderful? The ship is beautiful, but it is a masterpiece of American shipbuilding. If Zamvolt walked under the St. Andrew's flag, you would call him handsome
      1. 0
        April 28 2015 19: 50
        If you tried to show off your erudition here, then only the lazy don’t know about its American construction.
    3. Granatkin
      0
      1 May 2015 22: 20
      How nice that at least one of those discussing the topic can read flags!!!! Thank you, brother, for understanding!!!!! Congratulations, V.V.
  73. -1
    April 28 2015 03: 42
    I thought for a long time who Zamvolt reminds me of. By design, this is a submarine and its place is under water!
  74. 0
    April 28 2015 06: 14
    Quote: SaVL
    I thought for a long time who Zamvolt reminds me of. By design, this is a submarine and its place is under water!

    For me, this is a Soviet iron, bought by my mother in 1972 and still working well in my household. Heavy, with massive contours, pot-bellied, a carbolite handle - the superstructure and behind the handle a rear protrusion - the stern. Visible to everyone from afar.
  75. 0
    April 29 2015 01: 37
    There’s really no arguing about tastes, but for me, “Novik” is just damn beautiful.
  76. -1
    April 29 2015 09: 33
    How did a British freak top the list of beautiful ships? How did this freak even get into this rating? Where are Bismarck, Yamato, Iowa? Aren't they handsome? How did 8th and 9th place get on the list? Is this beauty according to you? Our ships, the same Sarych, are many times more graceful, more elegant, and with all their menacing appearance they show their power. Even Western experts believe that the silhouettes of our ships look much more aggressive and faster than Western barges. For me, first place goes to the Orlans and there are no options.
    1. 0
      April 29 2015 13: 27
      The main criterion for beauty was swiftness in outline.
      I don’t know about others, but I think one of the fastest torpedo boats, the G5, is simply ugly.
  77. 0
    April 29 2015 10: 26
    every man to his own taste. I would name 2 beautiful ships - Richelieu and the battleship Väinemäinen
  78. +2
    April 29 2015 11: 30
    The article struck me with its fantastic duality! That is, the author quotes the “enemies” who recognized Soviet ships as the pinnacle of military aesthetics, and immediately compiles an awkward rating, which includes floating structures that are generally alien to any kind of engineering aestheticism! What is so beautiful about an aircraft carrier, no matter what it is? Well, I spent half a month on the Kuz, crawled from keel to keel and saw nothing but stinking holds. A month of combat service on the Peter the Great, on the contrary, made me fall in love with the beauty of this ship, which is beautiful from ALL angles, especially when you go around it in a motor boat. I went down under the bottoms of both of these cruisers, but everything there looks like it - a flat, upside-down football field. As for the palm, I would give it to either project 1144 or project 1134, amazing from any angle. And I love MY ships, which may seem unsightly to others - the Moskva anti-ship missile of Project 1123, which looks gorgeous in profile, and the Lenok SPL of Project 940, which looked great from the very forward point of the bow superstructure.
  79. +2
    April 29 2015 20: 33
    no one will ever prove anything to me tongue
  80. 0
    1 May 2015 08: 27
    Sharnhost is great, why only 10th place xs :).