Airships can still return to the sky

33
It is believed that the century of classic airships ended in the 1937 year, and the century of airships that would have replaced them, still can not come. And this is despite the fact that airships are potentially the cheapest means at the moment for air cargo transportation. However, the Hindenburg catastrophe still looms on the horizon, preventing these brilliant ships in the past from revealing in the modern realities of the 21st century. But will this go on and on, or will the situation still change?

A classic airship is an aircraft lighter than air, a combination of a balloon and screw engines (electric or internal combustion), as well as a control system and orientation in the air (control surfaces), thanks to which this aircraft can move in any direction regardless of observable air currents and their directions. Since these vehicles are lighter than air, they can "float" in the air due to buoyancy if their average density is less than or equal to the density of the atmosphere. These air giants were in the air thanks to the Archimedean force. Most often, the airship envelope was filled with gas lighter than air. It could be hydrogen or helium. At the same time, the capacity of these aircraft was proportional to the internal volume of the shell, taking into account the mass of their design.

Records that were set in their time by these air giants resembling whales are impressive today. Suffice it to recall the nonstop flights from Germany to Rio de Janeiro, which are unthinkable today, with sleeping cabins and grand pianos on board. Thanks to the peculiarity that airships could hover at high altitude, they were able to moor to the spiers, on the tops of the skyscrapers of New York or to the ordinary fence somewhere on the outskirts of Paris. In calm weather, the aircraft could land on virtually any flat platform.



The key to these excesses was the already mentioned Archimedean force, thanks to which the airships were kept in the air. Thanks to this power, the airships did not feel the need for a constantly operating wing, on which it was necessary to supply the incoming air flow. Due to this, being much slower than their modern aircraft, airships spent significantly less fuel per passenger-kilometer. The same Archimedean force made them safer and undemanding to the airfield network. She mitigated the accident, not allowing airships to pick up too high speed when falling to the ground.

Even the most famous catastrophe with their participation, which, in fact, put an end to these aircraft, was not so terrible. The mysterious disaster of "Hindenburg" was, but she would not surprise anyone today in terms of the number of victims. Even with this catastrophe, the death rate among airship passengers was significantly lower than among passengers of aircraft of those years. Being in their weight close to the air, airships never fell down like a stone. At the same completely burnt-up airship "Hindenburg" 35 people died from the 97, who were on board.

The termination of the operation of these aircraft, rather, was associated not with an epochal fire, but with the psychological effect it caused. The planes of those years were significantly smaller, and their frequent accidents could not impress anyone. We can observe something similar in our days, when everyone perfectly understands that in aviation In accidents, an order of magnitude fewer people die than in ordinary road accidents, but with the large number of people who are afraid of air travel, it is almost impossible to find an avtomobophobe. The newsreel, which was filmed at the crash site of the Hindenburg, multiplied by the psychology of the masses, ignored the statistics - that is why the world for many years abandoned large-scale aeronautics, preferring wings.



However, at the end of the 20th century, interest in the air giants was revived again. Now, instead of explosive hydrogen on board the airship, inert helium is used, the production of which has become relatively cheap at the current stage of development of equipment and technologies. However, until now the scope of the airship is quite limited: observation of traffic, reconnaissance, advertising, or pleasure flights. Despite this, a number of projects exist and are being implemented that are aimed at reviving airships. In the first place as a modern vehicle, especially when it comes to transportation of goods of an unusual, non-standard form. Similar projects today are being implemented in many countries of Europe, in the USA and the Russian Federation. And if in Russia the emphasis is on transport airships, then in the US they are interested in the military, who want to get a cheap and simple means of intelligence.

Cheap reconnaissance airships for the US Army

From 2005, it began to seem that the situation with airships is beginning to change for the better. First, DARPA - Agency for promising research projects of the US Department of Defense, and then the Pentagon itself began to order the development and production of airships designed to conduct long-term reconnaissance in Afghanistan. Interest in the airships explained by economic motives. The fact of the matter is that the cost of flight hours for UAVs that were used in Afghanistan and Iraq reached several thousand dollars, and the satellites could not constantly monitor the same area.

At the same time, only for the period from 2010 to 2013 years, American UAVs in Afghanistan flew a million hours, resulting in multibillion-dollar costs. At the same time, the hour of the airship flight, which can be in the air for weeks, is much cheaper, and the installed equipment can be significantly larger, since the airship capacity is several tons instead of hundreds of kilograms of unmanned aerial vehicles. The US military expected to reduce their exploration expenditures and at the same time increase its effectiveness by installing a heavy Argus surveillance system on airships, which was able to track 6 square kilometers from 64 kilometers in height.



The first sign was to be the airship from the company Mav-6, which introduced the M1400 model with a volume of 37 thousand cubic meters. However, this project was not brought even to the stage of the first flight. In 2012, this project was finally terminated. The reason for the closure was the flaws that did not allow installing the Argus reconnaissance system and the protracted stage of creation on it. The military expected that the first airship would be able to begin combat tests in Afghanistan as early as February 2012, however, these plans were violated.

The LEMV airship, developed by the British company Hybrid Air Vehicles, was a much more promising project. The British managed to build the largest airship among all existing. At the same time they decided to save on its creation, leaving the car with a virtually soft lining (the presence of internal cable extensions for rigidity). Continuing the topic of savings, the British abandoned active ballasting. Instead, the airship was supposed to receive 40% of its lifting force not from helium, but from the oncoming air flow. For this the hull of the catamaran airship resembled a large wing, while for the take-off and landing it needed a runway.

It was assumed that the airship system LEMV will be able to take on board about 2 tons of payload. Up to three weeks he had to continuously carry out the tasks of collecting various information, reconnaissance and observation of the terrain at an altitude of up to 6 kilometers. For one of his duty, the duration of 21 day, the airship could cover a distance greater than 4 000 kilometers. The airship was unmanned. The system used on it could support the conduct of various operations even in remote areas, providing the possibility of combat control of the airship outside the line of sight. At the same time, an unmanned airship LEMV could independently carry out inspection and adjustment of the onboard equipment, launch and route a flight. In non-flying weather, he could land on his own at points that were agreed with the dispatcher.

Airship "LEMV"


However, this project was closed. The shortcomings of the apparatus directly flowed from its merits. The device could not rely on one Archimedean force and hang in one place, it needed a runway. And the fabric sheath of a LEMV airship in strong wind conditions could simply be crumpled, making it difficult to use the airship in bad weather conditions. At the same time, no one could guarantee the availability of good weather during a three-week flight. In 2013, the US military turned the project around.

Some hopes of the military associated with the project Aeroscraft. In January 2013, the first photographs of the novelties were published, which were of great interest. The prototype of this airship called Dragon Dream was ready to fly. With a successful scenario, this airship could be a real breakthrough in the aircraft industry, as the huge size (the prototype was much smaller than the planned production samples) and the lack of needs for a developed ground infrastructure could give a new breath to tourist cruises and military transport logistics. These two directions were basic for the Aeroscraft project.

According to preliminary information, which appeared in the press, created by the airline Aeros, based in California, the airship Aeroscraft could reach speeds in 222 km / h, the maximum height of its flight would be 3,7 km, and the maximum range - 9700 km. At the same time about 2 / 3 lifting of the aircraft was provided by helium, and another one third due to propellers, aerodynamic forms of the apparatus and its tail. Also, unlike the LEMV airship, it had a hard shell, which made it possible to use it in bad weather.

Dragon Dream Airship


But this project was pursued by failure. It was possible to create only a prototype Dragon Dream with a length of 81 meters and a volume of thousands of cubic meters in 17, only enough money for this demonstrator-technology. By fatal coincidence, the airship was based at Lakehurst, the same place where the famous Hindenburg burned in 1937. Placing it in the hangar, which has not been repaired since World War II, ended tragically - the collapse of the roof on the device, after which he was no longer subject to restoration. Here is a coincidence that made the Pentagon temporarily freeze all work in this direction, which does not mean that they will not be continued in the future, even if on other projects.

Russian "Atlant"

Over time, interest in aircraft that do not need roads and airfields that are scarce for Russia has also awakened in our country. In the second half of last year, RosAeroSystems, headed by Gennady Verba, was able to receive a small cash grant from the Skolkovo Foundation.

According to the vice-president of RosAeroSystems, Mikhail Talesnikov, interviewed by Lenta.ru journalists, the first part of the work on the Atlant airship is 9 months. The first part of the work is coming to an end, the preliminary design is almost ready. The airship itself with a flattened bottom surface is designed to be rigid; sheathing is used like a semi-monocoque. According to the calculations, the airship will be able to continue flying even with headwinds and side winds at a speed of 30 m / s (on a soft airship Au-30 produced by the same company, such a flight was possible at speeds up to 17 m / s).

Airship Au-30


In addition to active ballasting at the moment of take-off, it is planned to apply thrust from engines that twist downward-tilting screws. According to Talesnikov, after takeoff, the engines will be able to lift the large hull of the Atlant airship with a length of 75 meters and a width of 30 meters, operating as one large wing. It is planned that the cruising flight speed will be equal to 120 km / h, with the flight range of 4000 km and carrying capacity in 16 tons. In the absence of failures in financing the project, the first flight of the Atlant airship is scheduled for the end of 2018.

Unlike our overseas colleagues, Russian airships do not involve military use. The first airship "Atlant" should become a full-fledged transporter, which can replace the heavy Mi-26 helicopter. Although it will be inferior to it in carrying capacity (16 tons versus 20 tons), Atlant with a net weight of 25-30 tons will be able to transport much more bulky cargoes by air - its cargo compartment will exceed 1700 cubic meters against 110 cubic meters in the Mi-26 or 1000 cubic meters of the giant An-124 "Ruslan". At the same time, with the Atlantic having twice the lower cruising speed, it will be able to deliver the cargo not by 475 km, as the Mi-26 helicopter can do, but several times further.

According to the calculations of the company's specialists, the cost of shipping cargo on their airship will be just 75 cents per ton-kilometer (up to 24 thousand dollars for one flight with a full load within 2000 km radius). At the same time, like a helicopter, when unloading the airship can hang over any suitable platform. If it is necessary to sit down to receive a large load, the airship can be lowered onto an air cushion, details of which are currently being patented, so nothing is said about it. With it, he will be able to sit not only on any flat surface, but also on ice and water. For calm weather, it is sufficient to have a landing site with 100 dimensions on 50 meters, for an all-weather landing - 225 x 90 meters. Due to the fact that the Atlant may be 40% heavier than air, the airship will not become an easy toy of the wind. It will also allow year-round to be based on an unprepared site without a mooring mast and boathouse.

Airships can still return to the sky
"Atlanta"


Will the Russian creators of Atlanta succeed in bringing the matter to full-fledged mass production, or will they repeat the experience of their American colleagues, time will tell. So far this question is open. But in any case, the use of airships in our country, where the delivery of goods and equipment to the eastern part of the country often requires laying roads or strengthening bridges, looks promising. Over the territory of 70% of Russia, these sky giants are clearly more necessary than anywhere else on Earth.

Information sources:
http://lenta.ru/articles/2015/02/28/zeppelins
http://www.vonovke.ru/s/dirijabl_-_sovremennyie_dirijabli
http://aviations.ru/2012/05/30/vvs-ssha-zakrli-proekt-gigantskogo-dirizhablya
http://supercoolpics.com/2013/01/08/гигантский-aeroscraft-нечто-среднее-между-са
http://techvesti.ru/node/2499
33 comments
Information
Dear reader, to leave comments on the publication, you must sign in.
  1. +4
    3 March 2015 05: 54
    urgently for "Russian post". and for the northern delivery it would be nice too
    1. +3
      3 March 2015 06: 51
      There are no hangars on them.
      (note the three people in the lower left corner)
      1. 0
        3 March 2015 21: 40
        And you carefully read the article: Due to the fact that the Atlant can be 40% heavier than air, the airship will not become a light wind toy. It will also allow year-round to be based on an unprepared site without a mooring mast and boathouse.
      2. Kassandra
        +1
        5 March 2015 03: 26
        hangars are needed for maintenance work ...

        When does a ship enter a port, is it immediately put into a dry dock every time?

        the airship should fly, and not stand idle in the boathouse.
    2. +1
      3 March 2015 07: 58
      Quote: Russ_Dry
      and for a northern delivery it would also be nice

      Of course it is, but in this case, the carrying capacity is against, or more than 10 pieces will be needed
      1. 0
        3 March 2015 10: 58
        Hybrids can be used. Having a large load capacity with an equal volume
    3. Aspirin
      +2
      3 March 2015 18: 06
      The airship will bring much more benefit when transporting outsize cargo. There are no limits for him.
  2. +7
    3 March 2015 07: 10
    A very interesting and, in my opinion, perspective direction of aeronautics. Well, just humanly I want the airships to be. Beautiful cars.
  3. +3
    3 March 2015 07: 55
    We need airships very much now. At sawmills, so that roads do not lead there. In the mountains. Large air transportation, such as machine carriers. These are all great prospects. And if someone would build a kilometer airship, I would buy an apartment there. This it’s a fairy tale, not a car. The main thing is that this fairy tale would come true.
  4. +4
    3 March 2015 07: 55
    But I really don't like hybrid airships. In fact, there is a deliberate rejection of the canonical airship - which, even in the event of the failure of all engines and rudders, hangs quietly in the air. In a good way, an airship should be all-metal. Helium should give all lifting power. However, for an additional percentage of it, make the shape of the airship as aerodynamic as possible. To organize full electric movement - all engines, steering and marching - electric, with coaxial pushing screws in the ring. Power - from an atomic reactor on board - satellites with atomic reactors fly, atomic icebreakers and atomic cruisers go. And no one is afraid. What is the atomic airship afraid of then? And besides, the nuclear reactor will give the airship an unlimited cruising range and will allow thermal ballasting - a separate small chamber will be filled with hot air, ensuring the airship take off. When the air in the chamber is cold, the airship becomes heavier than air and sits smoothly. And the heat for this air in the chamber, so that the airship takes off, will give the nuclear reactor. And it can also be served on external surfaces so that it does not icy in flight. And of course, it must be very large to provide a load capacity of 500 tons of payload.
    1. +3
      3 March 2015 09: 36
      wink if you put a nuclear reactor on the airship, then helium is not needed, because there is so much heat released ... you can fly in hot air
    2. +1
      3 March 2015 09: 36
      wink if you put a nuclear reactor on the airship, then helium is not needed, because there is so much heat released ... you can fly in hot air
      1. 0
        3 March 2015 10: 12
        However, the lifting force of hot air is much less than that of helium.
        1. +2
          3 March 2015 18: 34
          Helium is a rather expensive gas, and Helium has a very small molecule size, so it easily "seeps" through any shell.
          - theoretical lift 1m3 Helium ~ 1kg
          - practical lifting force 1m3 Helium ~ 0,4kg
    3. +1
      3 March 2015 11: 40
      Quote: Basarev
      In fact, there is a deliberate rejection of the canonical airship - which, even in the event of the failure of all engines and rudders, hangs quietly in the air.

      Fantasy ... Calmly, because of its HUGE size and the winds blowing at a height, it will not hang.
      Therefore, "hybrid" is a perfectly normal alternative. It has both its pros and cons. "Each vegetable has its own garden"
      1. 0
        3 March 2015 12: 15
        However, hybrid ones have a critical drawback that crosses out all the advantages - they need a runway, which means that for Russia, where these same stripes are in terrible shortage, they are unsuitable.
        1. +3
          3 March 2015 12: 24
          Quote: Basarev
          which means - for Russia, where these same bands are in terrible shortage,

          Well, this is not a fact. You must first figure out which runways they need. So we have airdromes in every district center since Soviet times. So that.
          Yes, and for conventional airships, the infrastructure is still necessary, WHAT, some hangars are worth ...


          1. 0
            3 March 2015 13: 17
            In addition, hybrid ones are unable to freeze in place, in principle, which makes it impossible for their direct purpose - northern delivery. After all, how does everything happen with helicopters? The helicopter hangs and lowers the load to the ground with an external suspension, where it is disassembled.
            1. +1
              3 March 2015 20: 45
              Quote: Basarev
              In addition, hybrid freezes in place are incapable in principle

              Who told you that? They are different. There are hybrid type VERTOSTAT,

              read here in short ...

              http://olymp.as-club.ru/publ/arkhiv_rabot/devjataja_olimpiada_2012_13_uch_god/po

              chemu_pojavljajutsja_proekty_gibridnye_aehrostaticheskie_letatelnye_apparaty / 28-

              1-0-553
              1. 0
                3 March 2015 21: 07
                And the hybrid helicopter type has extremely vulnerable farms and fuel consumption is much higher than a canonical airship should.
                Yes, and he is ugly ...
  5. ICT
    +1
    3 March 2015 07: 56
    / / / / / / / / / /


  6. +1
    3 March 2015 08: 15
    Good luck to dirigible builders! They wanted to use an air cushion landing in ECIPE, an airplane which itself is a wing. In Atlanta, the lifting force created by the surfaces of the hull is also used. It would be nice if the ECIPs were revived, if there were any beauty at all!
  7. 0
    3 March 2015 08: 56
    How is Au-30 decrypted? Is Aurum Gold? Or is it Ai-? Aerostat Ivchenko ???
  8. 0
    3 March 2015 09: 17
    The article is not complete enough.
    But all the same - "plus".

    Yes, Skolkovo!

    Why is the work on the development and testing of airships and balloons of the Volsky VNIC of the RF Ministry of Defense not covered?
    Secret?
    And there, believe me, there is something to brag about!

    One gets the impression that, apart from Skolkovo, no one else deals with this topic. This is not the case.
  9. 0
    3 March 2015 09: 33
    At the same time, an hour of flight of an airship, which can be in the air for weeks, is much cheaper
    oh? Have you calculated the cost of ground handling?

    Due to the fact that the Atlant can be 40% heavier than air, the airship will not become a light wind toy.
    I understand that for this all helium will have to be released? What kind of helium consumption is it supposed to have to remove all of it from the shell?
    1. 0
      3 March 2015 10: 41
      You were inattentive when reading the article, engines create part of the lift, this compensates for the lack of lift.
    2. 0
      3 March 2015 10: 46
      Quote: tchoni
      At the same time, an hour of flight of an airship, which can be in the air for weeks, is much cheaper
      oh? Have you calculated the cost of ground handling?
      no more expensive than airplanes and helicopters
      Due to the fact that the Atlant can be 40% heavier than air, the airship will not become a light wind toy.
      I understand that for this all helium will have to be released? What kind of helium consumption is it supposed to have to remove all of it from the shell?

      Why exactly helium? Can hydrogen with a catalyst (used in cars)
      1. 0
        4 March 2015 09: 30
        Quote: Vasya
        Can hydrogen with a catalyst (used in cars)


        And what will be the weight of this non-combustible mixture? In the first world genos, the Germans conducted very extensive research in this area ... As far as I know, they did not achieve anything worthwhile. Either weighs a lot or burns well ...
        In cars, as far as I know, the task is just the opposite. Provide combustion ...
    3. 0
      3 March 2015 11: 02
      Helium is not "released". There are special tanks in which air is pumped to reduce the lifting force.
      1. 0
        3 March 2015 11: 19
        Quote: Spade
        Helium is not "released". There are special tanks in which air is pumped to reduce the lifting force.


        Isn't helium? In general, Atlant, in my opinion, is not the name, I think the Blue Whale is more suitable. In general, the first association is this. I did not know that we have analogues of the American dragon dream designing, it pleases. It would be nice if we were the first to launch them in a series. smile
        1. +3
          3 March 2015 11: 31
          There are tanks with helium, there are tanks with air. Two ways to reduce lift. Either pump helium into cylinders, or pump additional volumes of air into reservoirs and / or cylinders. Or both.
          Helium is not released in any case, except in an emergency. For dear ...

          The disadvantage is the response time to the control action. Because muddy with hybrids that have not only tanks with helium, but also aerodynamic planes to create lift.
      2. 0
        4 March 2015 09: 22
        As I understand it, in order to create weight - 40% of the mass of air displaced by the airship, REMOVE all helium. THE ENCLOSURE MUST BE CONSIDERED BY THE AIR BALLET. Then the mass of the structure, and it is quite small (all the flyers were built, not the tank) and will provide this weight. Ways to remove helium 1) squeeze with a balloon (pressure changes inversely with volume; therefore, decreasing V by 2 times, we get the effect of increasing pressure 2 times. Given the modest fact that, to ensure the stiffness of the shell, the gas is already slightly above atmospheric pressure (about 1.2 times, at least), we get an increase in pressure to 2.4 atmospheres (3 atmospheres in a car tire). In this regard, the question arises: will the casing withstand and can we quickly pump such pressure into the balloon? - the answer is rather this will not. And considering the fact that at the same time remain half (well, albeit somewhat less due to the increase in the density of 2 times) lift, come to the conclusion that this method does not suit us.)
      3. 0
        4 March 2015 09: 27
        We go further .... We try to remove helium in a specially trained high-pressure cylinder. theoretically there you can reduce the volume of hundreds or even thousands of times. but for this we need a high-pressure compressor, and its work does not happen fast .... Yes, and it weighs quite a bit ... So, in principle, it is possible. but in airfield conditions. So we got rid of the tower, added a compressor station ....
  10. 0
    3 March 2015 10: 37
    The creators of Atlanta good luck and mass production. The machine is needed, the economic effect on the face.
  11. 0
    3 March 2015 11: 07
    Dear ones, I have a question, why exactly are the giants, but small ones for surveillance and security, stationary, equipment-bound (patrol), easy to assemble, why work and work, and if you combine the airship and the air cushion?
    1. 0
      3 March 2015 12: 18
      In this segment drones rule now.
      1. Kassandra
        0
        5 March 2015 03: 35
        drones-balloons and drones dirigibles too ...

        in general, why as soon as it comes to the fact that the airships are specifically crushing to slow down the development of Siberia (even to the detriment of the Canadian taiga, because it is smaller), then a large number of colorful articles immediately appear with the explosion of the Hindenburg, although it is known that the German anti-fascist bombed it and refueled was it hydrogen because the firm was under US sanctions for the supply of helium?
  12. 0
    3 March 2015 11: 14
    Tell me better: how much will it fly from Vladivostok to Moscow time? how much does the ticket cost? and when will they start selling?
    1. 0
      3 March 2015 18: 38
      last year an 1 ticket for a pleasure flight ~ 3 an hour near Moscow cost 15000 rubles
    2. The comment was deleted.