ADATS multipurpose missile system

36
ADATS (Air Defense Anti-Tank System - anti-aircraft and anti-tank system) is a short-range anti-aircraft missile system designed to destroy both low-flying air targets and ground-based armored targets. It was created by the Swiss company Oerlikon Contraves (now Rheinmetall Defense) and Oerlikon Aerospace from Quebec (now Rheinmetall Canada).

ADATS is in service with the Canadian army as a low-altitude anti-aircraft complex. The first complex was delivered in 1988 year. In total, 1994 complexes were supplied before 36. Thai Air Forces have one shelter complex integrated with Skyguard fire control system.



The complex has a modular design and can be installed on tracked or wheeled vehicles of various types, such as M113 and M3 Bradley. For example, the version of the complex for the Canadian army is made on the M113 BTR chassis, and the option for the American army is on the M3A1 Bradley chassis. In addition, there were attempts to integrate the ADATS complex with the MOWAG Piranha type chassis (1995x10 wheel formula) in 10. This version of the complex was to perform the tasks of air defense of airfields, power plants and other important objects.

Canadian complex is installed on the armored vehicle M113. Also available is its fixed version on the platform for installation in the shelter; This option can be integrated with the Skyshield anti-aircraft complex from Oerlikon Contraves.

ADATS multipurpose missile system


Multi-purpose machine complex ADATS MULTI-MISSION EFFECTS VEHICLE (MMEV)

In September 2005, the Canadian Armed Forces announced the design and development of 33 Multi-Mission Effects Vehicles (MMEV) based on the ADATS complex. The MMEV was supposed to combine anti-tank and anti-aircraft capabilities in one platform and be capable of destroying ground targets such as armored vehicles and underground structures, as well as aircraft, helicopters, unmanned vehicles and cruise missiles. The vehicle was to be developed by the Canadian Armed Forces in conjunction with Rheinmetall Canada and Defense R&D Canada.

The MMEV system was to be based on the existing ADATS complex installed on LAV III 8x8 vehicles from General Dynamics Land Systems, which have been in service with the Canadian army since 2001. Along with the ADATS rocket, it was supposed that the MMEV system would fire an armored-piercing long-range missile and an indirect-guidance missile. In November 2006, the Canadian Army closed the MMEV project.




Who died in the Bose project MMEV

Network structure of the ADATS complex

ADATS complexes can be combined into a network structure consisting of six complexes located at a distance of 20 km. Any ADATS complex can become the main one, and the entire tactical node can be connected to other command objects in real time.

Fully automatic real-time data exchange includes airspace control data, weapon control, fire control, target identification data, the status of each system and vehicle position, assignment of target priorities and optimized weapon distribution, target lock conditions, weapon status, and electronic suppression triangulation data . A tactical unit of six complexes can capture air and ground targets simultaneously up to 48.

Communication channels are provided by radio stations with fast frequency tuning or a landline wire line. The fast tunable channel uses more than 2000 frequencies with 25 kHz channel spacing. The system architecture provides full-duplex data exchange and simultaneous half-duplex voice exchange.

Missile MIM-XNUMHA complex ADATS

The ADATS missile can destroy all types of low-flying targets, including assault helicopters flying at very low altitudes at distances beyond the range of hand-held complexes. ADATS anti-aircraft missile system has a range of 10 km for aerial or ground targets.

The rocket is guided by the laser beam, and the laser-guided grid is digitally encoded to increase accuracy and immunity to electronic countermeasure measures. Jet propulsion rocket smokeless, operating in the "acceleration-inertial motion." The maximum speed of the missile is more than 3M, and its maneuverability - 60g.

The rocket has a laser fuse with a different delay time, which is automatically set when the rocket is launched. The cumulative fragmentation warhead weighs 12 kg and has armor penetration up to 900 mm rolled homogeneous armor. The complex consists of eight anti-aircraft guided missiles in transport-launch containers.



Fire control and surveillance

ADATS optical-electronic systems for tracking targets and missile guidance are supplied by Lockheed Martin Missiles and Fire Control and are based on an improved version of the target detection system and target designation / night vision of the Apache helicopter TADS / PNVS.

The infrared front vision system (FLIR), based on the American universal module, operates in the range from 8 to 12 microns. It provides full operational readiness in all weather conditions. Other systems include a television system on a vidicon for daytime conditions, a carbon dioxide laser for pointing missiles and a range finder on a neodymium laser on an yttrium aluminum garnet, operating at a frequency of 1,06 microns.

Pulse-Doppler two-beam radar circular view, operating in the X range (from 5200 to 10900 MHz) is an improved version of the LPD-20 radar, developed by the Italian branch of the company Oerlikon Contraves. It is used to capture and identify targets and allows the ADATS complex to operate autonomously. The radar has a fast frequency tuning and is truly coherent. The radar of the main ADATS complex can transmit targets to other complexes in the tactical node, while their radars operate in silent mode.

The capabilities of the radar to work in target tracking mode during the scanning process and computer-aided evaluation of 20 targets in the network configuration simultaneously allow the operator to distribute the means of destruction for targets with the highest priority. The system can also conduct a programmed search in motion and search by sector. The range of action is 25 km to a height of 8600 meters.

The sequence of capture and destruction of targets

The time from the initial detection of the target to the launch of a rocket is less than five seconds. The capture sequence begins with the detection of the target and the corresponding rotation of the turret, in the case of firing at air targets using radar, an infrared front view system and a television system, and in the case of firing at ground targets using an infrared front view system and a television system. The sequence of searching and capturing targets for tracking is performed using an infrared front-view system and a television guidance system.

The launch and guidance of the rocket is carried out using infrared and television target tracking systems and a carbon dioxide laser beam. The time required for the launch of the second rocket after the completion of the first cycle is less than two seconds.





















Materials used:
www.army-technology.com
www.bemil.chosun.com
www.designation-systems.net
www.rbase.new-factoria.ru
www.wikipedia.ru
www.wikipedia.com
36 comments
Information
Dear reader, to leave comments on the publication, you must sign in.
  1. -10
    5 March 2015 06: 35
    Aw, handsome!
    Where are we like? am
    1. +6
      5 March 2015 06: 56
      Quote: Corporal
      Aw, handsome!
      Where are we like? am

      Than you do not like the tunguska and the carapace the same thing, only the tank will not pierce in the forehead and the attachments will carry it
      1. +7
        5 March 2015 07: 51
        I really like this handsome man much more successfully ADATS will be
        1. wanderer_032
          +3
          5 March 2015 18: 03
          Quote: insafufa
          I really like this handsome man much more successfully ADATS will be


          Only on the ground, the Tunguska cannot work with its missile weapons.
          Yes, and with the guidance on the "ground" of cannon armament, too, there are certain problems.

          And if the "Tunguska" is put in an advantageous and well-equipped position in terms of engineering, only then it will be of use.
          And then we have "smart" "generals" in the 1st Chechen war, drove them to storm Grozny. Where they were successfully fighters and roasted from RPGs.
        2. 0
          6 March 2015 16: 54
          It will be if the ATGMs are included in the ammunition load, the number of missiles is increased to 8 (4PTUR, 4ZUR). The ATGMs can be equipped with different warheads, add to the cumulative thermobaric
        3. 0
          6 March 2015 16: 54
          It will be if the ATGMs are included in the ammunition load, the number of missiles is increased to 8 (4PTUR, 4ZUR). The ATGMs can be equipped with different warheads, add to the cumulative thermobaric
      2. -1
        5 March 2015 18: 51
        Quote: insafufa
        only the tank will not penetrate the forehead

        fool
        This is from the series: "We have a good hunting rifle that has no analogues in the world, hurray hurray hurray. Only it does not bring down a bear." wassat
      3. +2
        5 March 2015 19: 54
        The presence of universal missiles allows the use of air defense of the first echelon with a minimum of protection, or without it at all.
        Such complexes should be located in close proximity to guarded positions, sometimes right behind the tanks. And they will have to provide additional protection to the detriment of the main forces of the offensive.
        The fact that universal missiles are capable of hitting ground targets like ATGMs does not mean that this machine MUST hit ground targets. This is an emergency option, but it should be available.

        Honestly, I’m upset that we don’t make such cars (the Tunguska still won’t do anything to the tank, no matter how much you admire it). In our army, highly specialized troops are adored to act as divisions, as in textbooks. This is suitable for a global war, but for small local conflicts the versatility of weapons and the ability to quickly adapt to the situation is more important.
        And something tells me that local conflicts happen more often than global wars of states.
        1. +1
          6 March 2015 16: 59
          I’ll add that different missiles from this complex fly around tanks and planes
        2. 0
          6 March 2015 16: 59
          I’ll add that different missiles from this complex fly around tanks and planes
        3. +1
          7 March 2015 18: 12
          Why won't Tunguska do anything to the tank? One turn of 30 millimeters and the tank will lose combat efficiency. It will not penetrate the frontal armor, but it will destroy all sights and observation devices. Such experiments were carried out.
          Take a closer look at the tanks, you will see these things sticking out. And very, very vulnerable.
    2. +2
      5 March 2015 07: 26
      Quote: Corporal
      Where are we like?

      Well, there’s no such thing directly, we don’t use laser guidance for missiles ...
      The closest analogue of 9K33M3 "Osa-AKM" ... the truth on earth can not ...
      1. +4
        5 March 2015 08: 19
        Quote: Nayhas
        Well, there’s no such thing, we don’t use laser guidance

        Used as extra. canal in the shell.
    3. 0
      6 March 2015 16: 50
      There is Tunguska, but it is necessary to develop. Finalize the same Terminator and include it in the ammunition
    4. 0
      6 March 2015 16: 50
      There is Tunguska, but it is necessary to develop. Finalize the same Terminator and include it in the ammunition
      1. 0
        7 March 2015 01: 33
        Terminator and so the ear is "overloaded". Where there to shove the missile defense?
  2. +4
    5 March 2015 07: 17
    The complex is clear weather. I didn’t quite understand by the channel - 8 targets are being followed, but how many are firing at the same time? So is reaction and fire performance?
  3. +5
    5 March 2015 07: 25
    In fact, the car is unsuccessful, not anti-tank and anti-aircraft missile systems. And the photo with the NARs snapped me at all.
  4. +6
    5 March 2015 08: 11
    I remember it was actively advertised at the beginning of the 90 x. It was shown at all arms exhibitions. I read about it for the first time in the Western Military District. There was also a picture where the complex was shooting, it was spectacularly made.
    1. +2
      5 March 2015 14: 54
      Quote: Magic Archer
      I remember it was actively advertised at the beginning of the 90 x. It was shown at all arms exhibitions. I read about it for the first time in the Western Military District. There was also a picture where the complex was shooting, it was spectacularly made.

      It is interesting that detailed information about ADATS is in the issues of the Foreign Military Review back in 1983-84, although the complex itself was adopted only in 1986. Still, Soviet specialists carefully studied foreign novelties of military equipment)
  5. +4
    5 March 2015 08: 23
    An interesting complex. good
  6. +9
    5 March 2015 08: 59
    In my opinion, it is better to have a separate good ATGM and a separate good air defense system than an under-ATGM combined with an under-air defense system.
    1. iAi
      +1
      24 May 2015 16: 14
      ATGM and air defense systems - just in case, but there are different cases.

      In Russia, they make a similar air defense system "Sosna"
      http://topwar.ru/75473-letom-nachnutsya-itogovye-ispytaniya-mobilnogo-zrk-sosna.
      html
  7. +4
    5 March 2015 08: 59
    MMEV had to combine anti-tank and anti-aircraft capabilities in one platform and be able to destroy ground targets such as armored vehicles and underground structures, as well as aircraft, helicopters, unmanned aerial vehicles and cruise missiles.

    Damn clever guys. BMPT lovers - the car for you. A real wunderwolf. Ours, praise be to Allah, did not think of this in the "shell" ... I can imagine what will happen to the containers of missiles and radar if the car gets under the usual mortar shelling ... And I am silent about more serious calibers ...
    1. +1
      6 March 2015 01: 23
      The BMPT of the second performance is somewhat modified, the containers with missiles and the gun are protected by bulletproof and anti-shatter armoring, this machine has a perspective. At the expense of the versatility of the air defense system .... I completely agree with you! it’s like with all-weather tires, they are good only in the fall and spring, they simply are not suitable for winter and summer.
  8. -1
    5 March 2015 09: 09
    Quote: Corporal
    Aw, handsome!
    Where are we like? am

    ATGM "Chrysanthemum" is capable of not only hitting ground targets, but also work at high-altitude targets.
    1. +1
      5 March 2015 18: 59
      Obviously, Chrysanthemum has a ceiling height of not 5 km.
      The complex is newer, TTX worse.
  9. +2
    5 March 2015 09: 45
    Crossed a hedgehog and a snake. As an engineer, I can safely say that the requirements for missiles for hitting air and ground targets differ markedly. And the semi-active homing head with a laser target designation channel for air defense systems is at least a controversial step.
    1. +1
      5 March 2015 11: 23
      Do not say so boldly. smile
      Israel successfully produces (and is used in combat)
      universal missiles that can also be used as anti-tank missiles,
      and as an explosives, and as an explosive, and as an explosive ...
      The rocket is the same. Only the LMS and the software changes.
      1. +5
        5 March 2015 11: 58
        Quote: voyaka uh
        Israel successfully produces (and is used in combat)
        universal missiles that can also be used as anti-tank missiles,
        and as an explosives, and as an explosive, and as an explosive ...

        I don’t mind, only the ATGMs do not need a speed of 3,5-4 M, and the warheads of the SAM and ATGMs are different and the homing heads. Therefore, it is possible to make a universal rocket only cost it will be as 4 specialized, or it will be limited in application. By the way, many ATGMs can be used by helicopters (for example, 9M123, 9M120)
        1. 0
          5 March 2015 14: 41
          Quote: igor36
          ATGM speed 3,5-4 M nafig not needed


          Why so? High speeds are less likely to intercept.
        2. +2
          5 March 2015 16: 22
          "Therefore, you can make a universal rocket only if it costs
          will be like 4 specialized "///

          This is true, the price is high, but there is no headache: provide these with such missiles, and
          these others ... some from one factory, others from another. Now some are missing, then others.
          And the accuracy with the combined GOS increases at times: either IR video, or heat,
          or a laser light, or an optical cable .. Not so, so this way the target will find.
      2. 0
        5 March 2015 12: 09
        Quote: voyaka uh
        Do not say so boldly. smile
        Israel successfully produces (and is used in combat)
        universal missiles that can also be used as anti-tank missiles,
        and as an explosives, and as an explosive, and as an explosive ...
        The rocket is the same. Only the LMS and the software changes.

        give examples
      3. +3
        5 March 2015 14: 52
        And what is the practical sense in this kind of unification? The parameters of the product are very mediocre, and the price of development and production does not increase linearly.
      4. +1
        5 March 2015 15: 23
        Good afternoon!
        Quote: voyaka uh
        Israel successfully produces (and is used in combat)
        universal missiles that can also be used as anti-tank missiles,
        and as an explosives, and as an explosive, and as an explosive ...
        The rocket is the same. Only the LMS and the software changes.

        Yes, as much as necessary, and not only in Israel. Each of our ATGMs in the "instructions" says that it can be used against low-speed air targets. But, this is not the same as SAM.
  10. 0
    5 March 2015 12: 50
    Nice complex, but the grandfather RBS-70/90 copes with the same tasks, and at times cheaper.
  11. +2
    5 March 2015 17: 54
    Dear, in practice, how many complexes are in operation 36, so it turns out that from the beginning of production to this day it is not in demand, that’s the answer to all questions and disputes
  12. wanderer_032
    0
    5 March 2015 17: 55
    The complex is not ultramodern of course, but the very realized idea of ​​combining air defense systems and anti-tank systems on the same platform is very interesting.
    With the development of modern technology, it can be made more compact and easier.
    Such a thing as a missile weapon on BMPT, beauty ... winked
  13. 0
    5 March 2015 20: 24
    The complex was designed during the Cold War. A kind of replacement for Chaparelu, + ATGM functions. But the USSR ordered to live long, therefore ADAST was not in demand, like many other weapons systems. With complete air supremacy, spending on air defense systems is unnecessary. So the Pentagon decided, and they were right. Those who will now start to object, I would like to ask you to answer the question: "Where and when did the US Armed Forces use short-range air defense systems since the collapse of the USSR?" That is that! ADAST would be useful in the USSR-USA confrontation. In other wars it is not needed; it is very expensive for export. But believe me, if there was a need for it, this complex would replace Chaparel in the US Army.
  14. 0
    8 March 2015 09: 13
    Our SAM Pine, similar.
    But this is the only air defense system without compromise.
  15. 0
    9 March 2015 15: 39
    The complex is daring!
  16. 0
    8 February 2016 23: 06
    But how many NATO and the USA in particular?