Russian Air Force waited for a new aircraft

34
Joint tests of the SU-34 front-line bomber were successfully completed. Commander-in-Chief of the Air Force, Alexander Zelin, signed the September 19 test act, which recommends adopting a new vehicle. In total it is supposed to put into operation 120 airplanes of this model before 2020 of the year. According to the plans of the Ministry of Defense, the aircraft should be replaced by outdated SU-24 bombers, which, however, will not be completely discarded, but left to perform their respective tasks. Deliveries are supposed to be carried out in several stages. Thus, the RF Air Force will have at its disposal five squadrons of SU-34 and 24 units each. The project cost was about 20 trillion rubles. The novelty will be exported only after the formation of the first strike force in the Russian Air Force.

Russian Air Force waited for a new aircraft


Americans are confused, they lack something similar to our new product and in the near future it is unlikely that a competitive model of this type will appear. There is something to panic about, because they simply have nothing to oppose to the creation of the Sukhoi Design Bureau.

The new aircraft, in its ability to perform tasks, approaches the class of distant aviation. Due to the ability to refuel in the air, its radius of action is limited only by the presence of a flying refueling tank in its area of ​​operation. The first air refueling was carried out on it during a non-stop flight from the western part of Russia to the Far East, to the venue of the East 2010 exercises. Pilots have the opportunity to relax, replacing each other, and eat, warming in the microwave onboard rations. In addition, to reduce fatigue, the pilot seats are equipped with a massage backrest, first used in military aviation. In general, according to the reviews of the pilots, the car turned out to be reliable, powerful and comfortable.

On technical equipment SU-34 has no equal in any Air Force of the world. It carries up to eight tons of various weapons on the 12 external suspension points, its arsenal includes new air-to-air and air-to-surface missiles. Ammunition corrected by a satellite system can be used, thanks to which the aircraft becomes a unique means of accurately suppressing small targets, such as terrorist bases, command posts and various military depots. New radar with active phased array capable of detecting targets at long range. The 30 caliber gun, mm, is included in the standard weapon kit; an upgraded L-150 “Pastel” installation serves as a warning of detection by an enemy air defense system.



The power plant of the novelty is represented by the AL-31F turbojet engines, which, with 80,9 kilo-newtons in flight mode and 132,3 kilo-newtons in the afterburner, can give the car a speed around the ground 1400 km / h, and at an altitude of about 10000 meters, 1900 kilometers per hour. All this with a take-off weight of more than 44 tons. At the same time, the onboard supply of fuel provides the range to 4000 kilometers.

The safety of the crew in this aircraft is at its highest level thanks to the armored cabin with a wall thickness of 17 millimeters. Such armor protects pilots and equipment from being hit by small-caliber guns and missile fragments; a similar cockpit stood on the Su-25 attack aircraft. In an emergency situation both in the air and on the ground, the catapult allows the crew to leave the aircraft almost instantly.

It is worth noting a curious fact from the still short biography of SU-34. Being not yet officially accepted into service, he had already managed to show himself in real combat operations. We are talking about the war in South Ossetia in 2008, during the operation to interact with the forces of the strike aircraft of the Russian Air Force the plane was fighting with the Georgian air defense systems. As a result of the combat use of anti-radar missiles, the enemy’s 36D6-M radar was destroyed. By the way, this is not the first experience of using weapons that have not yet been adopted by the army, this practice was widely used during the Soviet era.



Sukhoi Design Bureau began the development of the SU-34 at the end of the eighties, and already in April 1990, the prototype front-line bomber, designated as "Т10В-1", took off. It was based on the heavy SU-27 fighter, designed to gain air supremacy, and introduced a number of innovations. Thus, when designing the aircraft, the glider received additional horizontal tail; the pilots' seats were not located in tandem, as is customary, but next to each other. The entrance to the cab also moved from the traditional place for cars of this class and is now located in the niche of the front landing gear. The engines received an additional gas turbine installation TA14-130-55, thanks to which it became possible to start the main engines without the use of airfield equipment. This makes front-line bombers independent of the equipment of airfields in the front line. State tests of the SU-34 began in the 2006 year, in the 2011 year a few more changes were made to the design of the aircraft, and in this form it appeared before the selection committee.



The production of a new bomber is deployed on the basis of NAPO named after V. Chkalov, founded in 1931 year. Since 1996, the association has been part of the Sukhoi holding and, apart from the production of SU-34, is engaged in the program of creating the fifth generation fighter. To ensure timely deliveries of aircraft to the troops, NAPO has embarked on a project to modernize production and plans to spend about 2 billion rubles on this. Required to purchase and install new machining centers in the shops of the association. Part of the funds is provided under the program of modernization of the military-industrial complex, voiced by Vladimir Putin in April of this year. As the representatives of NAPO say, this will allow us to simultaneously assemble up to 20 machines and thereby prevent the delivery deadlines set by the government of the Russian Federation.

Finally, Russian aviation will receive an entirely new model, and not another modification, as it was many years before!
34 comments
Information
Dear reader, to leave comments on the publication, you must sign in.
  1. ballian
    -22
    22 September 2011 08: 40
    "Americans are confused, they lack something like our new product and are unlikely to appear in the near future."
    __________________________
    Is it that the site earns so?
    1. +17
      22 September 2011 08: 47
      Aha, to us as you in the US State Department do not give out salary ... wink
      1. ballian
        -14
        22 September 2011 09: 02
        Here is an analog
        http://ru.wikipedia.org/wiki/F-15SE_Silent_Eagle
        1. +10
          22 September 2011 09: 28
          and you believe that IB F-15SE with a load of 13 tons can fly at a speed of 2,5 m? Blessed is he who believes .....
          1. +4
            22 September 2011 09: 40
            LOL ... wikipedia as a source of information ... laughter ... soon at a pace when discussing weapons and equipment will be links to VKontakte and classmates ...
            1. ballian
              -8
              22 September 2011 10: 03
              Wikipedia - for ignoramuses who are not aware that the analogue of SU is 34 - F-15SE_Silent_Eagle.
              Or do you think that Makarov Roman has more to you than Wikipedia? :)))
              1. Jaguar
                +1
                22 September 2011 12: 12
                F-15E Strike Eagle already went for a fighter-bomber
                1. ballian
                  -1
                  22 September 2011 12: 37
                  There the classification by terms is different. Their Su-34 is also considered a "fighter-bomber"
                  1. +2
                    22 September 2011 12: 44
                    Well, we are not "there", we are "here" (well, who is like, apparently). so let's look like "here".
            2. Sanzyro
              +1
              22 September 2011 16: 03
              Believe it or not, they are already coming !!! I was recently stunned by this "argument". Whinnied for a long time. I just didn't want to answer! Why should a person break such a paradoxical perception of the world ?! feel
          2. ballian
            -1
            22 September 2011 09: 51
            If, of course, not with an external suspension, his design allows some of the types of weapons to be driven into "inside" (for stealth + aerodynamics), if necessary, he can add an external suspension.
            1. jamert
              +2
              22 September 2011 12: 38
              Silent Eagle is prepared purely for export. A shock function in the future will perform the F-35.
              1. +3
                22 September 2011 13: 20
                F-35B (modification of F-35 with GDP) is very close to the Yak-141 in design and layout. A combined power plant is also used here (1 PMD + 1 lift fan), the compartment with the lift fan (it performs the same function as the PD on the Yak) is also located behind the cockpit, and the lift-sustainer engine nozzle is also covered by tail beams although their length is less. The PMD nozzle design does use the idea first embodied in the R79V-300 (segments rotating in opposite directions). It happened because in the mid-1990s, the F-35 development company, Lockheed Martin, collaborated with Yakovlev Design Bureau for a short time. According to some reports, in 1995, Yakovlevites, with the permission of the Russian government, sold the Americans all the documentation for the Yak-38 and Yak-141.
                Another fifth-generation supersonic VTOL aircraft project is the Boeing X-32B. It uses the layout, as on Harrier type aircraft - with a single F119-614C lift-march engine. This engine is a modification of the engine designed for the F-22 Raptor, however, in addition to the flat nozzle, it has two front small nozzles and jet rudders for GDP. The main plus of the X-32B, like the F-35B, in front of the Yak is the ability to fly over-the-air without using afterburner. Also, both aircraft surpass the Yak-141 in maximum combat load - 2600 kg for the Yak versus 6350 kg for the X-32B and 6800 kg for the F-35B. Well, besides this, an important advantage of the F-35B (as well as the latest versions of the Harrier) is the possibility of refueling in the air, which allows to increase the combat radius.
                It should be noted that the comparison of the Yak-141 with the F-35B and X-32B is not entirely correct, since the latter are representatives of the fifth generation of fighters, while the "Yak" refers to the fourth. Nevertheless, many of the ideas used on it were used to create the F-35B, which defeated the X-32B in the competition to create a single strike fighter (JSF) and is now undergoing state tests.
        2. +3
          22 September 2011 12: 57
          F-15SE_Silent_Eagle
          First flight July 8, 2010
          Status being tested
          Units produced 1 (demo and flying)


          And from the same wiki:
          "The first Su-34s were used during the war in South Ossetia. The aircraft was used to cover the actions of strike aviation, conducting electronic warfare against Georgian air defense systems. To suppress the electronic systems, the Su-34 put interference from battle formations, which did not allow the Georgian air defense system to successfully detach from The Su-125 hit with anti-radar missiles at the most dangerous REMs of the Buk and S-34 air defense missiles. The container of active jamming of the Su-34 group defense showed high efficiency in the course of hostilities. During the combat use, the Su-34 destroyed the key Georgian radar 36D6-M near the village of Shavshvebi near Gori. "

          So at the moment there are no analogues of the Su-34.
          1. ballian
            -8
            22 September 2011 18: 57
            F -15 (and early modifications) he is ANALOGUE - educate.
            1. +6
              23 September 2011 00: 36
              Quote: ballian
              F -15 (and early modifications) he is ANALOGUE - educate.

              Actually, it is you who are enlightened.
              First, open your favorite Vika:
              "McDonnell Douglas F-15 Eagle" (English McDonnell Douglas F-15 Eagle) - American fourth-generation all-weather tactical fighter... Designed for air superiority. Introduced into service in 1976. "
              It is not an analogue of the Su-34, but the MiG-29. For the Su-34 is front-line bomber, and not a fighter, but the MiG is just XNUMXth / XNUMXth generation Soviet / Russian multirole fighterdeveloped at the MiG Design Bureau.
        3. 0
          22 September 2011 13: 05
          F-15SE_Silent_Eagle
          First flight July 8, 2010
          Status being tested
          Units produced 1 (demo and flying)


          And from the same wiki:
          "The first Su-34s were used during the war in South Ossetia. The aircraft was used to cover the actions of strike aviation, conducting electronic warfare against Georgian air defense systems. To suppress the electronic systems, the Su-34 put interference from battle formations, which did not allow the Georgian air defense system to successfully detach from The Su-125 hit with anti-radar missiles at the most dangerous REMs of the Buk and S-34 air defense missiles. The container of active jamming of the Su-34 group defense showed high efficiency in the course of hostilities. During the combat use, the Su-34 destroyed the key Georgian radar 36D6-M near the village of Shavshvebi near Gori. "

          So at the moment there are no analogues of the Su-34.
        4. 0
          22 September 2011 13: 06
          F-15SE_Silent_Eagle
          First flight July 8, 2010
          Status being tested
          Units produced 1 (demo and flying)


          And from the same wiki:
          "The first Su-34s were used during the war in South Ossetia. The aircraft was used to cover the actions of strike aviation, conducting electronic warfare against Georgian air defense systems. To suppress the electronic systems, the Su-34 put interference from battle formations, which did not allow the Georgian air defense system to successfully detach from The Su-125 hit with anti-radar missiles at the most dangerous REMs of the Buk and S-34 air defense missiles. The container of active jamming of the Su-34 group defense showed high efficiency in the course of hostilities. During the combat use, the Su-34 destroyed the key Georgian radar 36D6-M near the village of Shavshvebi near Gori. "

          So at the moment there are no analogues of the Su-34.
        5. +3
          23 September 2011 04: 52
          ballian - you, it seems, are not a fool and you could compare the weight and energy pumping of both platforms before your comment - compared the tuned "trabant" with the "Hummer"
          1. ballian
            -5
            23 September 2011 07: 29
            Where do you see a fundamental difference? He on earth can work just as well with a no lesser combat load.
            1. ballian
              0
              23 September 2011 09: 25
              To replace the Su-24 aircraft, the Sukhoi Design Bureau has created a promising multifunctional bomber Su-27IB (Su-34), (IS fighter - bomber)
              Designed to destroy ground and surface (including small, mobile, highly protected) objects in the tactical and operational depths of the enemy, as well as air targets day and night, in simple and difficult weather conditions. Able to fly in the following terrain, conduct a defensive air battle with all types of foreign fighters.
              Work on the creation of the Su-34 was launched in 1989. The aircraft was conceived as a counterweight to the American fighter-bomber F-15E.
            2. +1
              26 September 2011 05: 08
              ballian - a difference of ten kg kg well, of course, it doesn’t count, apparently, the fittings were put into the dryer and sold by weight ... although, comparing the characteristics, there is something to think about ... the machines are both good, but the drying is more extreme.
          2. ballian
            -5
            23 September 2011 10: 12
            And - so you don’t even know that the difference between F - 15 and F - 15 E (double) is that F - 15 E is a fighter-bomber.
            1. +2
              23 September 2011 18: 42
              Quote: ballian
              And - so you don’t even know that the difference between F - 15 and F - 15 E (double) is that F - 15 E is a fighter-bomber.


              You write about the F-15, and not about the F-15E.
              Quote: ballian
              F -15 (and early modifications) he is ANALOGUE - educate.

              And what early modifications of the F-15 do you mean?
              With the same success, we can say that the Mi-15 is an analogue of the F-21.
    2. +3
      27 December 2011 16: 24
      Sorry for being rude, but it seems to me that you have a diagnosis like Saakashvili’s, I feel sorry for both of you sad
  2. asavchenko59
    0
    22 September 2011 09: 44
    The car is excellent, but I'm afraid that there will be no capacities for its production and competent personnel. It's a pity.
  3. +6
    22 September 2011 09: 49
    But seriously, I was very pleased with this:

    "The novelty will be exported only after the formation of the first strike force in the Russian Air Force."

    The most important thing in my opinion. Not as usual, they did something, they don’t have any money, so we are exporting.
  4. mitrich
    +7
    22 September 2011 10: 51
    Nice to read such articles. I don’t know what the Air Force commander SPECIALLY said, but most likely:
    - it was a matter of regiments, not squadrons (24 cars in the squadron are too much, usually 9-10 working machines);
    - the cost of the project (20 trillion rubles ??? !!!!!!) also raises big doubts wink . Most likely the journalist was half listening, so I think that it was all about billions, not trillions.
    However, yesterday on the Zvezda TV channel they showed an experienced GA pilot, indicating 12000 ... kilometers as a sign of his experience (for the uninformed: flight hours are measured in hours, not in kilometers).
    Nice plane, I see no reason for skepticism ...
  5. Sergh
    +10
    22 September 2011 11: 56
    Yeah, guys, you got it! I have been living a kilometer from the Chkalov NAPO for about 50 years. I saw all sorts of samoli, in short, 24-ki "Chkalda" (as we call it), produces even now, Madeira of course, and so, 5 years ago and more, the plant was not heard at all, it was not visible, well, like died ... 3-4 back, suddenly made a little noise, then at night he began to snort (drive engines), but louder and longer. And since last year, well, we can a little earlier, and until now it yells day and night, I'm not even offended, but on the contrary ..! And, therefore, they are overhang now, as they flooded into the sky, and 34's engines are mighty, they will turn their ass in my direction, as much as their ears are laid and the grass is covered with ripples. So they thundered the summer, I looked, well, like, finally, our equipment will trample, yeah, in August they see the factory delivery to the customer, as I understand it, so a week, already in low clouds, in pairs, every day in the morning until the evening. What was going on here, on a shave, with barrels and a sharp candle to the top, turning to the ground, then one, then the next in loops. The roar was incredible overhead, even when the breeze was blowing in my direction from the nozzles, but two of them were twisting in the air at once, I stood with my head up for half an hour, people passed by, asked what kind of thing happened ... in Novosibirsk, too. Of course, 34 is a little heavy, but I think by the 15th year they will still change some modifi to AL-41. Generally cool fishing!
  6. Max
    Max
    +1
    22 September 2011 15: 42
    One question interests. The main difference between the Su-34 and the Su-35 is primarily that it is a bomber. Those. it should have less maneuverability due to a larger combat load. But for both cars it is 8t. Strange enough, don’t you?
    1. Jaguar
      +3
      22 September 2011 16: 21
      the Su-34 has armor and an extra pilot. That's the whole reason
    2. Sergh
      0
      22 September 2011 16: 44
      Well, look at such a thing. Let's say a motorcycle, and then they took a stroller and glued it to it, like the same engine, and more stupid things can be done on it, if you look at the current situation, the same Land Cruiser is a passenger car, but there is one with a box, it takes less passengers, and there is more manure, but in the very thing, it seems like nothing has changed, but he began to perform the tasks differently. Although the agility remained the same. So on airplanes, 34 seems to be a navigator-gunner, a bomber-shooter who has a steering wheel up to a bold. And the 35th single-handedly steamed, he was only entrusted to smack in the air, there are grenades on the ground, but this is rare, this is when there is no one, well, like everyone in the shop is sitting with beer. So front-line attack aircraft are needed to quietly, quickly, abruptly and from afar to shmalnu and dump, and if a potential "friend" is in the air, then to gamble him, so as not to fumble anywhere. But about the load, this is correct, but here's a jamb, but what the hell is more for him (they load up to 34 tons on the 10th), the whole load on the grenades has already settled down. If necessary, I went to the "Kamaz" and moved it, loaded it higher than the boards and moved somewhere, but on a dump truck I won't spin like that, but slowly, and you can see me far away. Well, okay, you will finish it somehow. Oh, while the clumsy, Seabiscuit 34 took off outside the window, it was even late, the candles were pulled out steeply, even the speed did not drop, he went to the west.
  7. +5
    22 September 2011 19: 38
    Su-34 was created to replace the Su-24.
    This is a front-line bomber, unlike the SU-35 fighter, the functions and training of the crews are also different, respectively. The SU-34 will suppress enemy air defense and any enemy ground means with a flight height of 50 m with enveloping the terrain at supersonic speed, the fighter does not have such an opportunity. 2 people allow the pilot to control the machine, and the navigator to use weapons without distraction. Refueling in the air and the ability of the crew to take turns to relax, as well as prepare a small lunch, makes it possible for the aircraft to stay on air for very long periods. with enemy aircraft.
  8. mishan
    +5
    24 September 2011 21: 54
    "The cost of the project was about 20 trillion rubles."
    We have the entire GPV until 2020 is these same 20 trillion. Typo ?!
  9. Yaroslav
    +1
    3 October 2011 05: 28
    120 cars are somehow not enough.
  10. bober
    -3
    17 November 2011 09: 46
    you as always have no analogues)))))))))))))))))
  11. NickitaDembelnulsa
    +1
    10 December 2011 15: 32
    I haven’t seen a better car, but just the sight of this handsome man makes the enemy think: Do I need to dig a grave for myself, a shovel in the form of a Su-34