The company OTO Melara showed a new artillery installation Forty Light

22
The IDEX-2015 exhibition in Abu Dhabi became the site for the first show of a wide range of various weapons and equipment that were not previously shown to the general public. In particular, the Italian company OTO Melara, part of the Finmeccanica group, presented its new development at this exhibition. Arms developers showed potential buyers their new naval gun mount Forty Light.

The company OTO Melara showed a new artillery installation Forty Light


The name of the Forty Light project (“Forty-light”) reveals some of its features. New ship installation was created with two basic requirements. The first concerned raising the firepower of naval artillery systems. Existing 30-mm automatic guns have a fairly high firepower, but in certain situations it may be insufficient. 40 mm caliber guns, in turn, are able to effectively carry out a number of combat missions associated with firing air and surface targets. Thus, based on considerations of increasing the firepower of boats and small ships, OTO Melara decided to create a new artillery unit based on 40 mm caliber guns.

The second important feature of the Forty Light system is its size and weight. Boats and small ships impose certain restrictions on the design of the weapons installed on them, due to the available volumes of holds and structural strength. In order to expand the list of possible carriers, the new OTO Melara Forty Light artillery installation received a turret with a gun, but does not have any underdeck units. As a result, the installation can be mounted directly on the deck of a suitable vessel without the need to modify its design.

The main element of the artillery installation Forty Light is a tower of a characteristic many-sided form. In developing this tower, some of the developments on the subject of stealth technology were used, which affected its shape. The body of the tower is formed by several rectilinear carbon fiber panels, placed at an angle to each other. Inside the casing are all the necessary units, including an automatic gun and ammunition systems. On the existing photos it is clear that the side panels of the tower provide hatches for maintenance.

Artillery installation OTO Melara Forty Light should be mounted directly on the deck of the base ship or boat. To do this, in the lower part of the tower there is a swivel base, with which the installation is attached to the deck. The base provides circular guidance. weapons (except for some sector in which the superstructure of the vessel is located). The proposed artillery system does not require any modifications to the ship’s design, with the exception of the power and control cables.

The Forty Light installation consists of three main units: the supporting platform, the lower part of the tower with a set of units and the swinging block with a tool. Due to the use of lightweight materials, the installation fully justifies its name: the total weight of the system (without ammunition) does not exceed 1900 kg. This feature of the installation should further expand the list of boats and ships that can carry it.



In the upper swinging OTO Melara Forty Light installation module, an automatic gun of the caliber 40 mm is mounted. The Italian gunsmiths did not begin to develop a new weapon, but decided to use the existing and widely used one. On the new artillery installation gun used Breda Bofors 40 / L70, created a few decades ago. This gun has a rate of fire at the level of 300 shots per minute and accelerates the projectile to a speed of more than 1000 m / s. The characteristics of the gun used were completely satisfied by the developers, as a result of which it was decided to improve the artillery installation only at the expense of additional equipment, control systems, etc.

Inside the turret there is a magazine on 72 projectile 40х364 mm R. There are two types of projectiles in the magazine. Such an opportunity has arisen due to the used double ammunition supply system. Depending on the type of target attacked, the installation operator may select the most appropriate type of projectile. Changing the type of ammunition should be made "on the fly", without any complicated and lengthy procedures. For the release of spent cartridges in the front wall of the casing there is a small rectangular window.

The used ammunition system has some drawbacks associated with the general layout of the artillery. Thus, due to the lack of under deck units, the installation operators will have to go on deck to recharge the store. In some situations, such a replacement of ammunition can be associated with certain risks. However, such disadvantages should be fully compensated by the main advantage in the form of the possibility of installing an artillery system on light ships and boats.

It is proposed to include a new high-explosive fragmentation projectile with a programmable fuse 4A40 OM in the OTO Melara Forty Light artillery installation. Such a fuse can operate in four modes, thereby further increasing the power of the projectiles. Depending on the need, the system operator can choose to undermine at a given distance or after a certain period of time after the shot; installed non-contact blasting; controlled non-contact blasting; contact blasting. In addition, the possibility of self-destruction of the projectile in the event of a miss. It is expected that the programmable fuse will be able to increase the effectiveness of shooting due to the detonation at the optimal point in time when the projectile is in close proximity to the target.

For aiming the gun in the installation of the OTO Melara Forty Light are used electric actuators with digital control. To search for targets and guidance tools can be used various radio-electronic means. Thus, an artillery installation can be used in conjunction with a naval combat information and control system. In addition, it is possible to create a special separate control panel. There is information about the development of an optical-electronic system for searching for targets and aiming weapons. This equipment can be either made as a separate module or mounted in a tower.

By combining different systems, three versions of the OTO Melara Forty Light installation were developed, with minimal differences in the design of the units. In the future, customers will be offered the following systems:
- Forty LightType A. A modification designed to be integrated into a ship / boat weapon system. It is controlled by the existing CICS;
- Forty LightType B. Type A version with built-in optical-electronic system, providing the possibility of autonomous operation. Communication is maintained with the ship's BIOS;
- Forty LightType C. Fully autonomous version with its own means of observation and without communication with the ship electronics.

At the moment there is only a demo model of a new artillery installation, which in the near future will carry on various exhibitions. The development of project documentation is now being completed. The assembly of the first prototype, which will be put to the test in the summer, should begin soon. Other deadlines for the implementation of various phases of the project have not yet been named. Probably, the new OTO Melara Forty Light shipborne artillery installation will be offered to customers no earlier than next year.

Judging by the published data, the Forty Light project is of great interest from a technical point of view. The new artillery installation of the Italian design differs from other systems of similar purpose by the relative ease of mounting on a ship or boat. Installation is made in the form of a relatively light tower, which does not require seriously modifying the design of the ship carrier. At the same time, the installation has a sufficiently high firepower and effective firing range, and is also capable of using projectiles with a programmable fuse. Thus, the OTO Melara Forty Light system may indeed be of interest to foreign customers. Nevertheless, it will be possible to talk about the real prospects of this installation only after the end of the tests, which will reveal all its real pros and cons.


On the materials of the sites:
http://navyrecognition.com/
http://shephardmedia.com/
http://janes.com/
http://bmpd.livejournal.com/
22 comments
Information
Dear reader, to leave comments on the publication, you must sign in.
  1. padonok.71
    +1
    26 February 2015 06: 40
    Not for the future C-RAM systems "Milarians" hurry up? The developers will begin to think about what kind of artillery module to stick in, and Milara already has a comprehensive solution.
    1. +3
      26 February 2015 11: 57
      Under C-RAM, they already have a ready-made car with a 76 mm cannon.
      1. +2
        26 February 2015 13: 34
        This kind of "scratching" begins to appear after aroused interest in other samples.
        For example:
        http://www.rg.ru/2015/02/22/pushka-site.html
        1. +2
          26 February 2015 13: 53
          This is not for Oto Melara. They themselves are "trendsetters".

          They have guns of caliber 155, 127, 105, 76, 30, 25 mm. And now the 40 mm
          1. padonok.71
            +1
            26 February 2015 16: 22
            Quote: Spade
            Under C-RAM, they already have a ready-made car with a 76 mm cannon.
            Well, 76m is not the only one alive C-RAM, as far as I remember it all started from the 155th. And then the 40th will still be more mobile than the 76th, while maintaining the necessary power to intercept (destroy). So you can put it not on 8x8 or a goose, but, for example, on some "Crusher", creating highly mobile (aero / aquamobile) nodes. And again, a person is not required to the AZU. Well, or with a person, for example on a Humvee. Is it logical?
            1. +1
              26 February 2015 19: 13
              Quote: padonok.71
              And then the 40th will still be more mobile than the 76th,

              20-mm "Centurion"

              35-mm "Praying Mantis"
              1. padonok.71
                +1
                26 February 2015 22: 12
                Quote: Spade
                20-mm "Centurion"

                Quote: Spade
                35-mm "Praying Mantis"

                Yes, I’m not talking about that, I’m talking about only an external control gun platform. Without radar.
                1. +1
                  26 February 2015 22: 42
                  Will not work. The small caliber has to be compensated for by a high rate of fire. With the appropriate load on the base. So, it’s drummed. True, the 76 mm has a huge plus range. These are generalists, not only C-RAM but also pure air defense. And to wind a helicopter with an artillery mount at a distance of 8 km is cool and in demand.

                  And if you need a C-RAM complex for transportation to the Humvee, you need rockets. For example, the EAPS vertical launch micro-rocket
                  They were tested in the year 12, then everything seemed to die out, but most likely after Donbass, where artillery reigns, interest will reappear.





    2. 0
      26 February 2015 18: 45
      Quote: padonok.71
      Not for the future C-RAM systems "Milarians" hurry up? The developers will begin to think about what kind of artillery module to stick in, and Milara already has a comprehensive solution.

      I do not dispute the performance characteristics of this weapon and have never been an admirer of Western design, but it looks very poor.
      1. padonok.71
        0
        26 February 2015 22: 14
        Quote: APASUS
        never been an admirer of western design, but it looks very poor.

        Wow, I agree. Not in the subject, but for comparison.
        1. Robespierre9
          +3
          27 February 2015 02: 50
          I served on this, the opinions are ambiguous, according to the reviews of the TOP it is steeper, mainly in terms of reaction time, it is at an unattainable height for the Tunguska, the Tunguska is difficult to control, the bicaliber rocket is expensive and complex and at the same time with manual control, if something moves fast enough, you get a hell of a , TOP is a robot, it can work without a crew, the technology is actually a different level, the Tunguska bypasses in all parameters, especially the reaction speed, Tunguska takes a long time to roll up and unfold, plus everything is backward in technology - strobes, some manipulators, everything is like from x is difficult and inconvenient, you can aim the cannon with a manipulator just fine - everything is very rude, you can make out the machine-radish you will be tortured, as for me something is better, like the S-50 on the chassis and missiles on a separate carrier, let everything be guided by an automatic machine, and not with "claws" , something like this. The classified information is not "dropped out" I hope).
          1. Boos
            0
            3 March 2015 19: 18
            Informative! It’s great to learn from a human practitioner.
  2. Dudu
    0
    26 February 2015 09: 00
    Melara has been developing interesting models for a long time, but they are being trampled upon by Americans with enviable persistence wherever large orders shine. Allies to the grave!
    1. +1
      26 February 2015 09: 38
      Nobody canceled competition in the market. Marketing laws. If you have the opportunity and finances to crush your opponent, then use it, even if your opponent has better "goods". It's easier to buy, of course, but somehow expensive: "Let's bomb it! And then we'll take everything for free!"
      1. gjv
        0
        26 February 2015 15: 38
        Quote: Ka-52
        Melara has been developing interesting models for a long time.

        For some reason, they consistently go to reduce the caliber and the number of trunks.
        Quote: Dudu
        however, Americans are trampling them with enviable persistence wherever large orders shine.

        Quote: Ka-52
        Nobody canceled competition in the market. Marketing laws. If you have the opportunity and finances to crush your opponent, then use it, even if your opponent has better "goods". It's easier of course to buy, but somehow expensive

        It seems that the Yankees of the Italians have not yet bombed, but, on the contrary, they bought a license from them for the 76-mm gun mount Mk 75.
      2. The comment was deleted.
  3. +4
    26 February 2015 09: 36
    This is the same famous anti-aircraft gun Bofors
    of the 2 World War only in the new
    packaging (and with more sophisticated shells).
    1. +1
      26 February 2015 10: 47
      Quote: voyaka uh
      This is the same famous anti-aircraft gun Bofors
      of the 2 World War only in the new

      but what is the anti-aircraft gun C-60, 57 mm worse ????

      C-60 at the Israel Museum .....
      1. 0
        26 February 2015 20: 17
        Quote: cosmos111
        C-60 at the Israel Museum .....

        ABOUT! Such were the neighbors! GSVG 1971 year. There was also a station with a plate on the chassis of the Urals and cables for guns.
      2. Robespierre9
        0
        27 February 2015 03: 21
        Nothing, ammunition is the main thing to do new and - a wunderwafer wassat (I'm completely serious)
    2. 0
      26 February 2015 16: 57
      I do not agree, only the dimensions of the projectile and the principle of operation of automation are common with that Bofors, everything else is different.
      The truth of the other in the gun is not so much left. :)
  4. +4
    26 February 2015 11: 54
    Did Lucas go to design weapons to draw ...
  5. +1
    26 February 2015 12: 09
    Mm mm .... And where to use such a thing? Again against the Basmachi?
    Indeed, if you put on a boat, he will have to go to the shore. And there is ATGM (well, or they will). Disguised and not opened. Mariupol events testify ...
    When a pair of boats was destroyed ....
  6. +1
    26 February 2015 12: 17
    The gun makes a strange impression. Futuristic design solution for exhibitions will be held. Beautifully made and shiny. The caliber of 40 mm is an intermediate one. And not a 30 mm machine with a high rate of fire, and not real fluff. In general - neither that nor that. Our fleet uses a 57 mm gun. The difference in caliber does not seem to be large, but in terms of characteristics it is significant. Well, programmable shells - it takes time to learn how to use them correctly. And how much will it be. There are more questions than answers. Moreover, the tests have not been carried out. And so, I repeat - a pretty little thing, glitters. smile
    1. +3
      26 February 2015 12: 52
      The caliber of 40 mm is an intermediate one. And not a 30 mm machine with a high rate of fire, and not real fluff. In general - neither that nor that. Our fleet uses a 57 mm gun. The difference in caliber does not seem to be large, but in terms of characteristics it is significant.

      40-mm - the minimum caliber for ZAK, in which it is possible to switch when working on anti-ship missiles from undermining warheads to work on a glider. Smaller calibers simply do not have the effective range and power of the shells to inflict damage on the RCC glider sufficient to remove the missile from the ship.
      Larger calibers lack rate of fire - especially if the target maneuvers.

      By the way, is the 57-mm cannon in our fleet, in an hour, not an ancient monster AK-725? On tests, of course, she worked well - but she did not save the "Monsoon" from anti-ship missiles, although the fire from it was carried out almost until the moment of impact.
      1. +1
        26 February 2015 14: 22
        Quote: Alexey RA
        Larger calibers lack rate of fire - especially if the target maneuvers.

        And if it is a 76-mm sub-caliber high-explosive guided projectile With an initial speed of 1100 m / s? smile
        http://www.otomelara.it/products-services/guided-ammunition/dart-1?WT.ac=DART
        1. Robespierre9
          0
          27 February 2015 03: 24
          I look at some Beaufors rival, they have the same ones ..
    2. Boos
      0
      3 March 2015 19: 30
      Yes, expensive shots are obtained, and the reliability of Italian weapons is questionable. I only know that the Beretta "Brigadier" is a reliable one for them, although in my opinion it is heavy. But on the other hand, it is also an automatic machine.
    3. 0
      5 February 2021 08: 36
      Read about the characteristics: projectiles with controlled detonation. Accuracy.
      Moreover, all this is mass-produced, but some advertised prototype (programming technology and projectile detonation).