Multi-purpose helicopter Sikorsky CH-37 Mojave

16
Sikorsky CH-37 "Mojave" (Sikorsky CH-37 Mojave, designation of the company - S-56) - a multi-purpose American helicopter, created by Sikorsky. His first flight machine made 18 December 1953 of the year. The helicopter was in service with the American army; in just 7 years of production, 156 of such helicopters were produced in various modifications, including experienced ones. Some machines (at least 4 units) were used in Vietnam as transport helicopters. By the end of the 60-s of the last century were completely replaced by a helicopter Sikorsky СH-54 Tarhe.

The S-56 helicopter was one of the first helicopters in the world to transport heavy loads. In the version of the helicopter in the CH-37B Mojave version, the maximum carrying capacity on the external sling reached 4536 kg. Until the US Army Sikorsky CH-54 Tarhe entered service, the CH-37 helicopter remained the most heavy-duty army helicopter in the US Army.

The appearance of this helicopter was preceded by a competition that was announced by the US Marine Corps. In 1951, KMP ordered the Sikorsky company to develop a large amphibious helicopter that could take up to 26 soldiers and 3 jeep vehicles or 24 wounded people placed on stretchers. Loading and unloading was to be carried out through the folding nose of the helicopter fuselage. It is worth noting that the S-56 was the first twin-engined helicopter of the Sikorsky company. The helicopter was equipped with two engines R-2800-50, developing on 1900 hp each, which were installed at the ends of the short wing. Serial machines were equipped with more powerful engines R-2800-54, developing power in 2100 hp. The main landing gear was cleaned in the engine nacelles, this solution was first used on a production helicopter.



Approaching the creation of a new multi-purpose helicopter, I. I. Sikorsky decided to give the car the shape and size of the popular DC-3 “Dakota” transport aircraft. While working on the general view of the helicopter and its layout, the famous designer of Russian origin once again showed everyone his amazing ability to implement non-standard solutions. In order to free the entire fuselage of the car, making it more voluminous, Sikorsky decides to place both sufficiently powerful Pratt-Whitney R-2800 engines in the nacelles located on the horizontal pylons on the sides of the fuselage. These pylons had the shape of wings and in flight created additional lift, unloading the rotor of the machine. Inside the pylons were oil coolers and fuel tanks.

The use of such a layout had a positive effect on the operation of the engines in flight and simplified access to them during the necessary maintenance on the ground. In accordance with the rotorcraft concept fashionable in those years, Igor Sikorsky provided for the possibility of upgrading his S-56. To do this, it was necessary only to mount over a pulling propeller in front of each nacelle, as well as additional wings on them. Also on the sides of the fuselage could be suspended two additional fuel tanks.

Rotation of the rotor was carried out through transmission shafts, which were connected with the main gearbox, located in the pylon above the cargo compartment, and the steering screw - with the help of transmission shafts passing through the intermediate and tail gearboxes. These shafts turned out to be very long and while refining the helicopter its creators were faced with the appearance of resonance. In 1956, the so-called supercritical transmission shafts were used for the first time in the S-56 helicopter.



Main screw for the first time in stories Immediately received 5 blades. The design of this screw did not differ from what was used on the model S-55, but its size has increased significantly. The diameter of the main rotor at the time of the creation of this helicopter was the largest in the world. A successful scheme developed by the S-55 helicopter allowed Sikorsky to achieve undoubted success with his new car. The four-blade tail rotor was located on the end rail, which for the first time was shaped like a keel with a trimmer. Such a beam-keel made it possible to completely unload the tail rotor during the flight at high speed, increasing its service life and transmission resource, and also contributed to the reduction of fuel consumption. Behind on the fuselage of the machine was installed controlled stabilizer.

Initially, it was intended to install flaps on the pylons of the engine nacelle in order to reduce the resistance to blow losses on a hover, but after some time they decided to abandon this idea. For the first time in the world, the S-56 helicopter was equipped with an automatic folding of the main rotor blades and the end beam. Due to this, the required compactness was achieved with a deck-based helicopter. The streamlined helicopter fuselage was all-metal and made of magnesium alloys. The helicopter had an impressive cargo compartment length - 9,24 m, width - 2,36 m, and height - 2,03 m. The volume of the cargo compartment was 42,5 cubic meters. Inside the helicopter could easily accommodate up to 26 paratroopers or 3 jeep. For unloading and loading of passengers and cargo in the nose of the fuselage was made a hatch with two wings, which opened sideways, there was a ladder. At the same time, the equipment could enter the helicopter under its own power. In addition, there were two doors on the sides of the helicopter. A two-seater cabin and a cargo cabin were connected by a hatch. Oversized cargo (for example, a wedge M-56) could carry a helicopter on an external sling.

The “airplane” fuselage of the helicopter not only contributed to the improvement of the aerodynamic characteristics of the car, but also promoted the use of a landing gear with a tail wheel, which facilitated taxiing on the ground. The helicopter was very stable on the run after landing on autorotation, in addition, there was no danger of hitting the blade on the beam - a shortage of helicopters made in a single-rotor scheme common in those years. To achieve high speeds on a S-56 helicopter, a retractable landing gear was first implemented. The rear support was pulled directly into the fuselage, and the main support - in the engine nacelle.



The folding of the end beam and blades, the opening of the doors of the cargo hatch and the feeding of the ladder were carried out with the help of hydraulic drives, and the cleaning and release of the chassis required all of the designers' attention. They had to work on the system of joint and separate control of engines. In general, it can be noted that all the components and assemblies of the new multi-purpose helicopter turned out to be unique, not having world analogues at that time.

In total, the US Army ground forces ordered a Mojave 91 helicopter. At the beginning of the 1960s, most of the helicopters ordered, which were originally designated as H-37A, were converted to the H-37В version. The H-37В helicopter was distinguished by the presence of an autopilot, shock-proof fuel tanks, reinforced flaps of the forward cargo hatch, as well as a more advanced set of flight equipment. In 1962, the H-37A and H-37В helicopters were renamed CH-37A and CH-37В, respectively.

At the same time, the American army Mojave had the opportunity to enter the "warpath". In May 1963, the first 4 CH-37V helicopters were sent to Detachment A of the 19th aviation companies of the US Army located in Vietnam. Here they replaced the helicopters SN-21 "Shan" design Pyasetskogo. Later, heavy multi-purpose helicopters were introduced into the composition and other companies of the army aviation of the army. These helicopters proved to be extremely efficient machines during the evacuation of American aircraft shot down by the enemy. The carrying capacity of the CH-37 Mojave helicopters was enough to transport damaged aircraft without first disassembling them from the territory occupied by the enemy. From the autumn of 1963 to 1965, only two Mojave helicopters, which were assigned to the 611th company, were able to evacuate 139 damaged machines, including Bell UH-1 Iroquois and SN-21 Shani helicopters.



The US Army Marine Corps received 55 such helicopters, which were originally designated as HR2S-1 (since 1962 - SN-37C). Another 2 helicopters acquired the US Navy. These were the helicopter radar surveillance and early warning HR2S-1W in the deck version. The largest helicopters were installed on these helicopters ( navy) AN / APS-20E radar manufactured by General Electric. Antennas for these radars were installed under the cockpit in a bulging plastic cowl-shaped cowl. For a long time, the Sikorsky helicopter continued to be the most lifting and largest of the first-generation helicopters in series. In a record flight, which took place in November 1956, the N-37A army helicopter was able to lift a cargo weighing 6 tons to a height of 2000 meters and 5 tons to a height of 3688 meters. Good aerodynamic qualities coupled with a powerful propulsion system allowed Mojave to set an absolute record for flight speed - 262 km / h. The combination even now is amazing - the most lifting helicopter at that time was also the fastest.

For seven years of production, the company "Sikorsky" has released all X-NUMX helicopters S-156 of all modifications. Delays in the delivery of the machine adversely affected orders. In this case, the helicopter industry was already on the verge of switching to fundamentally new helicopter models equipped with more powerful gas turbine engines. For this reason, the US military preferred to save money to order more advanced machines. And the company "Sikorsky" has remained unfulfilled a number of very interesting modifications of the helicopter, in particular, the heavy anti-submarine and passenger version. But despite this, the multi-purpose helicopter CH-56 Mojave can be considered an outstanding event in the history of the helicopter. The machine taught a lot to American designers, raising the bar for creating helicopters to a new height.



Flight performance of the CH-37 Mojave:

Overall dimensions: length - 19,58 m, height - 6,71 m.
The diameter of the rotor - 21,95 m.
The diameter of the tail rotor - 4,57 m.
Normal take-off mass - 14 062 kg, empty mass - 9449 kg.
Fuel reserve - 1514 liters + 2271 liters optional.
The power plant is a Pratt Whitney R-2-2800 54 xPD, each 1566 kW.
The maximum flight speed is 209 km / h.
Cruising flight speed - 185 km / h.
Rate of climb - 277 m / min.
The range of action - 233 km.
Practical ceiling - 2650 m.
Static ceiling - 335 m.
Crew - 3 person.
The payload is up to 26 paratroopers or 24 injured on stretchers, up to 4536 kg of cargo in the cabin or on an external sling.







Information sources:
http://www.airwar.ru/enc/ch/ch37.html
http://www.aviastar.org/helicopters_rus/sik_s-56-r.html
http://aviadejavu.ru/Site/Crafts/Craft21857.htm
http://igor113.livejournal.com/465508.html
16 comments
Information
Dear reader, to leave comments on the publication, you must sign in.
  1. 0
    12 February 2015 08: 23
    Analog Yak-24
    1. +2
      12 February 2015 08: 49
      An analogue of the Yak-24 was and remains the "Chinook" - a two-screw longitudinal layout of the rotors. Here is the Yak-24:
      1. +1
        12 February 2015 09: 38
        Quote: inkass_98
        The Chinook was and remains an analogue of the Yak-24

        Okay, Chinook "grew" out of the brainchild of Piasecki, whose Piasecki Helicopter Corporation transformed into Vertol Corporation and became Boeing where the Boeing Vertol division was formed.
        Ehrlich, creating the Yak-24, spied on the longitudinal scheme from Frank Pyasetsky, who by that time had created a series of "flying bananas".
        1. +1
          15 February 2015 12: 47
          It is not clear where you saw the discrepancy? Does the Chinook have a longitudinal (carriage) layout? The Yak-24 is not the same? Let me remind you that an analogue is "similar" (from the Latin analogia - "also spoken"), and the fact that the Yak-24 is made in the likeness of Pyasetsky's designs does not make it "not an analog". There is nothing to be found here. Your listing where this "pyasetsky" then went does not add any arguments. Empty talk. negative
    2. +1
      12 February 2015 08: 51
      And here is the Chinook:
    3. 0
      12 February 2015 09: 32
      Quote: qwert
      Analog Yak-24

      How arrogant and deceitful it sounds ...
      The retriever from Pyasetsky is clearly unknown to you, like all his "flying bananas" ...
    4. +1
      12 February 2015 09: 38
      The Pyasetsk SN-21 helicopter served as a catalyst for the construction of our Yak-24, and there Chinook appeared.
      1. gjv
        +1
        12 February 2015 11: 17
        Quote: veteran66
        The Pyasetsk SN-21 helicopter served as a catalyst for the construction of our Yak-24, and there Chinook appeared.

        Quote: inkass_98
        An analogue of the Yak-24 was and remains the "Chinook" - a two-screw longitudinal layout of the rotors.

        Quote: Nayhas
        Ehrlich, creating the Yak-24, spied on the longitudinal scheme from Frank Pyasetsky, who by that time had created a series of "flying bananas".

        The Piasecki H-21 Work Horse flew on April 11, 1952, and the Yak-24 (NATO codification: Horse) flew on July 3 of the same 1952. It is hardly possible to be so inspired in three months, even with a catalyst, to release a new helicopter. The design and performance characteristics of the Yak-24 are different with both the H-21 and the CH-47 Chinook (which means no one stole the drawings from anyone). Rather, the Yak-24 is more similar in silhouette, as Eugene writes, to the Piasecki H-25 Retriever, which flew much earlier in 1948 and in much larger quantities of 370 units. (against 40 pcs. Yak-24, mb because there were no aircraft carriers in the USSR, on which the H-25 was actively used for search and rescue operations and landing). Here is the H-25 Retriever and served as a "catalyst" for the application of the "flying banana" scheme, which was in fact, again, the American Piasecki HRP Rescuer (1947, 30 pcs.).
      2. The comment was deleted.
    5. 0
      15 February 2015 12: 41
      I think that there were no direct analogues to him in the USSR, but according to technical data, it turns out something close to the Mi-8 and Mi-6 (parameters of capacity and carrying capacity, an extensive cargo hatch for vehicle entry), and in design (piston engines in outboard nacelles) something similar to the Ka-26. But with the Yak-24 - nothing to do. In the United States, it corresponds to "Chinook" and, it seems, "Sea-Knight" (of which the first is still used in the US Marine Corps). Considering the date of creation - a serious technical breakthrough. good
      Amused by the fact that the Sikorsky and Pyasetsky mentioned in the text are both emigrants from the Russian Empire. In general, the aircraft industry in the United States rose very seriously in the 30-50s due to the "former Russians" (and it doesn't matter that they were not only Russians, but also Georgians, Poles)... This is another argument against revolutions, civil wars and other social cataclysms - only our enemies and competitors (also "non-friends") benefit from them. Let me remind you that according to the forecasts of Dmitry Ivanovich Mendeleev, Russia by the 50s should have had a population of at least 500 million people. Our patriots declared to the Gestapo something like: "We are 150 million! You won't shoot everyone!"
      Mdja ... sad crying negative
  2. 0
    12 February 2015 08: 31
    Interesting car. The only thing, its appearance is a bit surprising.
    1. gjv
      +2
      12 February 2015 11: 52
      Quote: Takashi
      Interesting car. The only thing, its appearance is a bit surprising.

      This interesting car at least flew, 156 pcs. It was built.
      And here is another interesting B-12 machine, unfortunately - three flights - two museums. But the look and design is also amazing!
      1. 0
        15 February 2015 12: 56
        I think that this project was simply not "inserted" into the transport flows of the USSR. Still, like it or not, air transport in the USSR was much less developed than in the United States. Railways dominated more. B12 was made "in a bundle" to An-22 "Antey". The latter also did not find adequate application in Russia.
        I always liked the wit in the modular design of the Mi-6, Mi-8 and Mi-12 (B-12): in fact, the engine-screw complex of a single sample was used, but what are the results! At least the following fact speaks about the genius of the Mi-8 (Mi-17) design: how many years has this device been successfully operated and continues to be produced ... What machine can still boast such durability while maintaining relevance?
    2. The comment was deleted.
  3. +4
    12 February 2015 10: 08
    Quote: inkass_98
    The Chinook was and remains an analogue of the Yak-24

    Quote: Nayhas
    Analog Yak-24
    How arrogant and deceitful it sounds ..


    Gentlemen, an analogue is an apparatus of a similar purpose and capabilities, not a circuit !!! The latest example ... An Indian tender where Chinook opposed Mi-26. For Indians, they are analogues.

    Two piston engines for one and a half thousand horses, and a large cockpit for cocking soldiers from the Yak-24 and CH-37. Here they are analogues.

    In addition, the word analog does not specify which machine was created before and does not talk about priorities.
    1. +2
      12 February 2015 10: 10
      Quote: qwert
      Gentlemen, an analogue is an apparatus of a similar purpose and capabilities, not a circuit !!!

      I take my words back.
    2. The comment was deleted.
    3. gjv
      +1
      12 February 2015 12: 08
      And here is another "analogue" and "follower" of the Yak-24 - Boeing CH-47 Chinook - since 1961, 1179 units have been produced. and has not yet been discontinued, and still flies. And skiing "willing".
    4. 0
      15 February 2015 13: 01
      You are not accurate here. I think that, in order to avoid misunderstandings and meaningless "knocking with horns", it is useful to distinguish between technical (constructive) and tactical (in terms of application) analogy. So if you say exactly about similar usethen your opponents tend to talk about a similar design decision.
      In fact, your reproaches are inappropriate, because they did not understand you because You yourself are not specifically expressed. fool
      As I understand it, this haste and carelessness in expressions haunts you at the moment. What kind of Indians are you talking about? If you mean Indians, say so. A Hindu is an adherent of the Hindu religion. In India, by the way, there are a lot of Muslims and Sikhs. Did you mean that among the Indian representatives there were only fans of Hinduism from the Kshatriya caste? Perhaps you are right (although it is unlikely that there are a lot of Sikhs among the military in India now), but where does this information come from? What is your statement based on? Again, will you reproach your opponents that "they misunderstood you" and point your finger at the explanatory dictionary? By the way, surely among the meeting delegation from Russia there are not only Christians, but also agnostics, atheists and Muslims (a Buddhist could easily get in the way).
  4. 0
    13 February 2015 01: 25
    And I was interested in a slightly different aspect, all the cars about which the commentators and the Mohav itself recalled, were the search for the most rational size of the army transport helicopter. The article mentions this - Sikorsky adjusted the size of the cargo cabin to that of the main air transport army vehicle of those years, machines based on DC-3. The most successful helicopter of this class to date I consider "Chinook". It is a pity that in the USSR such a machine was never created. Probably the closest was the Mi-6, perhaps as a result of systematic modernization it would be possible to create on it was based on the same efficient machine as the CH-47, but did not work out.
    1. 0
      15 February 2015 13: 17
      I do not agree with you. If my sclerosis does not let me down, the Mi-6 could in no way be analogous to the Mojavu application, since it was originally designed to interface with heavier cargo aircraft and the parameters are more serious:
      Designed under the direction of M.P. Andriashev, the streamlined fuselage was an all-metal riveted half-monocoque. The dimensions of the cargo compartment of the Mi-6 (12x2,65x2,5 m) were close to the dimensions of the cargo cabins of the An-8 and AN-12 aircraft. Along its sides and in the middle, it was possible to install 61 easily removable folding seats, and in the sanitary version to place 41 patients on a stretcher and two paramedics. Moreover, this capacity was not extreme for the Mi-6: in extreme situations, when operating a helicopter, up to 150 people were transported on it. The reinforced floor with mooring units provided for transportation of various types of equipment and heavy loads in the cargo compartment. For example, two ASu-57 self-propelled gun mounts or the BTR-152 armored personnel carrier, various guns and howitzers with standard tractors, or engineering equipment of the corresponding mass. The dismantled external suspension system provided transportation of bulky goods weighing up to 8 tons.

      Quote from "Corner of the Sky" http://www.airwar.ru/enc/ch/mi6.html
      According to TTX, it corresponds to the widely known Mi-8
      Mojave:
      Crew - 3 person.
      The payload is up to 26 paratroopers or 24 injured on stretchers, up to 4536 kg of cargo in the cabin or on an external sling.

      Mi-8T:
      Crew, people 2-3
      Payload: 32 soldiers or 12 stretchers with attendants or 4000 kg of cargo in the cabin or 3000 kg on the suspension
      Combat load - 1000 kg on 4 suspension units:

      Later modifications, where the coincidence of operational characteristics is more complete, I do not quote. hi
      1. 0
        15 February 2015 13: 47
        I draw your attention to the number of soldiers and goods transported in the cargo compartment.
        The differences in the number of wounded transported are due to the fact that the rules of military medical evacuation: in the United States, as in many NATO armies, it was customary to very tightly "pack" the wounded, tied to a stretcher. For example, the British, at times, were even simply hung from the outside of the helicopter ("there is no room in the cockpit, but we will carry off a couple!"). It was believed that it was necessary to take the wounded as soon as possible, and they would be rescued in the hospital ... In this situation, say, in the UAZ "nurse" five "carcasses" are quite crammed, while in the UAZ "ambulance" - 1-2 the patient.
        In the traditions of the Soviet Army, it was imperative that the wounded were escorted by medical personnel to partially provide assistance along the route, for which there were certainly places for medical personnel and passages between the stretchers to move them with the aim of observing and treating the wounded. The experience of the Second World War affected, and not only when the car might get stuck somewhere ... Source - textbook on military medical training wink