REA-2011 totals




Just a few days ago, the eighth international exhibition of armaments RUSSIAN EXPO ARMS - 2011, which was held in Nizhny Tagil, ended. In addition to weapons at the exhibition were presented ammunition and military equipment. Total participated about 300 enterprises from all over Russia. There were more foreign guests than ever, around 400 representatives from 40 countries, and 20 companies from five countries showed their products. None of the previous exhibitions gathered more press representatives - 650 journalists from 145 media.

The nature of the exhibits was emphasized by one of the phrases of the motto: “Offensive innovative policy of enterprises”. The general director of the local metal testing institute, Valery Rudenko, said that the nomenclature of exhibition samples had significantly expanded, in particular, through the products of the rocket industry.

An armored car was shown to everyone on the proving ground. "Lynx",



armored car "Tiger-M",



self-propelled anti-aircraft installations "Tunguska M1"



и "Buk-M2E",



long-range anti-aircraft missile system С400,



as well as operational tactical missile system "Iskander M".



For the first time, an anti-tank missile system was shown at the exhibition. "Chrysanthemum-S"



and Terminator, a support combat vehicle tanks.

The new, fundamentally different from the other vehicles, the unit of high maneuverability on tracks was introduced by the Vityaz enterprise. It is possible to use it both in military operations and for peaceful purposes, wherever there are great difficulties with the traffic.

Russian developments are fully capable of competing with foreign counterparts. For example, wheeled armored personnel carrier BTR-82A



According to experts, the Russian motorized rifle divisions and similar NATO units can equalize.

"Tiger-M" is equipped with an engine that meets the standard "Euro-4", the system of protection against weapons mass destruction. The armored car “Lynx”, the brainchild of Russian-Italian friendship, is capable of patrolling and escorting on the territory of hostilities. The principle of "safety capsules", which organized the internal space of the machine, helps to effectively protect the life of the crew. More than a dozen states already have such armored cars in service. Finally, he came to Russia.

T-90 riveted everyone's attention

The main highlight of the exhibition, its most interesting exhibit, was the tank T-90С. Viewers saw how he easily overcomes a water barrier, rushes past at full speed and shoots in flight, jumping on a springboard. Noise, crashing, burning targets - the spectacle is very colorful and unforgettable.



The upgraded version of the tank differs from its predecessors by the presence of a guided missile, which is capable of firing at a distance of 5 km. The tank mass is increased, which is now equal to 48 tons, and still it is much lighter than the similar Americans and Germans. The new engine allows you to reduce fuel consumption, at the same time it is more powerful than the previous model and is quite comparable in power with foreign analogues. And the established steering wheel control significantly reduces the load on the driver. To improve the comfort of the crew even provides air conditioning. The T-90 is capable of speeding up to 60 km / h on the highway. To improve maneuverability, a rear-view camera and a combined night vision device were installed on the tank.



The developers say that this tank is a new stage in the development of Russian tank construction. The possibilities of fire destruction, protection against most anti-tank weapons, high mobility and a reliable life support system - all this suggests that T-90С is much better than its predecessors. T-90C - "tank soldier": reliable and versatile.

The visit of Vladimir Putin

Visited the exhibition of weapons and the Prime Minister. With great interest, Vladimir Putin examined the new military equipment: an unmanned aircraft, an armored Ural truck, as well as a modified T-90C. After watching the video praising the tank, Putin could not resist getting into the cockpit, which he did, assessing the degree of comfort and testing the tank control system.

Deputy Prime Minister Sergei Ivanov said that the tank exists in a single copy, and for military needs will be purchased modernized T-72, almost the same in performance, but twice cheaper.

Using the example of T-90C, Vladimir Putin said that this technique is Russia's pride, and since the defense-industrial complex has such scientific, personnel and production potential, special attention will be paid to its development. A serious statement was made - 64 billion rubles or more 2 billion dollars will be allocated from the state budget. Experts say that this will be a great opportunity for the domestic military industry to make a serious breakthrough that will allow us to continue to hold the palm in the production of the most modern combat equipment. All these subsidies will go to the development of "Uralvagonzavod", which today produces the most modern domestic tanks - Т90С.

Alas, over the past years, Uralvagonzavod practically did not receive large orders and fulfilled only small orders of foreign companies. As a result, it was a waste - for 2009 a year its revenue amounted to 36,2 billion rubles. Thus, the net loss of the company amounted to more than 7 billion rubles. Practically the same tendency was preserved in 2010, and only state subsidies in the amount of 28 billion rubles made it possible to correct the situation a little. Therefore, the specialists of the company have placed many hopes on receiving subsidies in the amount of 64 billion rubles. This will allow not only to pay off debts, but also to carry out a number of upgrades at the plant.

Results of the exhibition

Nizhny Tagil proving ground "Staratel", where the exhibition was held, will become the main federal platform for demonstrating the capabilities of military equipment. In addition to the visit of the Prime Minister, the exhibition was marked by the presentation of many new products, the main star was the modern T-90С tank.

The exhibition was even more successful than expected by the organizers. And, although the information about the concluded contracts was not disclosed, the information that 11 states were interested in the new domestic tank was announced.

Photos of other exhibits are presented below.















































Photos used:
http://gurkhan.blogspot.com
Ctrl Enter

Noticed a mistake Highlight text and press. Ctrl + Enter

52 comments
Information
Dear reader, to leave comments on the publication, you must to register.

I have an account? Sign in

  1. pokermen
    pokermen 13 September 2011 09: 31 New
    • -4
    • 0
    -4
    All the more insistent and insistent hints that it’s not worth taking Russian ... ...... French armored personnel carriers and howitzers have already added to the mistral, lynx and drones ....... soon we will change the Kalashnikov to M16
  2. Joker
    Joker 13 September 2011 09: 40 New
    • 10
    • 0
    +10
    I liked the mounted armor on the BMD-4 and BMP-3, the option of upgrading the BMP-1 also looks solid.
    1. Rustam 14 September 2011 00: 29 New
      • 3
      • 0
      +3
      BMP-1 modernization option also looks solid
      ________________
      only the Ukrainian flurry system looks solid (wow) the BMP-1 itself needs to retire
      By the way, in Ossetia, 5 BMPs were captured by ours in a similar configuration as trophies
      1. Joker
        Joker 14 September 2011 09: 24 New
        • 6
        • 0
        +6
        If there is money for the re-equipment with the new BMP-3, this is wonderful, but if they don’t find the money, then putting the module and hanging up the armor is still better than using the original with a 73-mm thunder gun.
        1. Rustam 14 September 2011 09: 41 New
          • 2
          • 0
          +2
          true about this I wrote below !!!! about BMP-3 (deplorable situation of the Kurganmashzavod depressing) the management collected loans and let them go, now bankruptcy proceedings are in progress
          last year’s debt of the Ministry of Defense’s Kurganmash plant is short delivery 75 BMP-3-LET FIRST DELIVER THESE-which I strongly doubt
          because of this, 10 bmd-4m will they get airborne this year?
  3. jamert
    jamert 13 September 2011 12: 02 New
    • 0
    • 0
    0
    as well as the Iskander M anti-aircraft missile system.


    It's just not clear when Iskander became an anti-aircraft missile system.
  4. Esso 13 September 2011 14: 22 New
    • 2
    • 0
    +2
    Dear author, where have you read such a .....!
    It’s just that the video did not say that in the event of a breakdown, the engine of the American analogue changes in 35 minutes, and the same operation for the T-90S can be carried out only in three days.
    You have seen enough American videos about their much-praised Abrams. I explain to you. It took place in Iraq. The American engine changes only at the factory. Within 1 day. In the field, this is not possible. The tank must be evacuated to the location of the repair base where it can at least under patching. The crew cannot do this. The Russian T-90s engine was removed in just a couple of hours, with the help of trees and tankers the engine was removed and repaired in the field in 2 days. This was in India during the T-90 test. I did not change the mark, but repaired. At that time, the replacement engine in a spare area cost the crew 2 hours.

    Deputy Prime Minister Sergei Ivanov said that the tank exists in a single copy, and for military needs will be purchased modernized T-72, almost the same in performance, but twice cheaper.
    We’re stupid Minister Ivanov. The T-72 will no longer be produced. Most likely, the mothballed cars will be modernized.
    The armored car "Lynx", the brainchild of Russian-Italian friendship, is able to patrol and escort on the territory of hostilities. The principle of “safety capsules”, by which the interior of the machine is organized, helps to effectively protect the life of the crew. More than a dozen states already have similar armored vehicles in service. Finally, he reached Russia.
    What for us a lynx. From its production all plants refused. Lynx is the same Italian Iveco. Not better.
    1. Maximum
      Maximum 13 September 2011 18: 40 New
      • 1
      • 0
      +1
      I join the opinion of Esso, but a little inaccuracy, everything is true, as for the fact that in the field we managed to remove the engine and fix it, but on the T-90))) I doubt that the designers took a step back on this modification))) the principle of modularity very in demand by all engineers))) therefore, the competence of the author of the article begins to bother me.
  5. ZEBRASH
    ZEBRASH 13 September 2011 14: 29 New
    • 2
    • 0
    +2
    Deputy Prime Minister Sergei Ivanov said that the tank exists in a single copy, and for military needs will be purchased modernized T-72, almost the same in performance, but twice cheaper.

    I doubt that the modernized T-72 will be at the level of T-90C with twice lower price belay It seems to me the price (or quality) of the T-72 is slightly underestimated no
  6. kagorta 13 September 2011 15: 11 New
    • 0
    • 0
    0
    And who knows what kind of machine it is with a machine gun in the tower, very much like the German T-2 from the Second World War because of this? For intelligence or what?
    1. Joker
      Joker 13 September 2011 15: 13 New
      • 1
      • 0
      +1
      The control machine for chrysanthemums.
  7. petor41
    petor41 13 September 2011 15: 20 New
    • 1
    • 0
    +1
    I was at this exhibition! Honestly, I was disappointed specifically! There’s nothing to watch at all! The organizers need to tear their heads and hands behind half-empty pavilions! There was nothing small arms or equipment! In the best case, a representative came from some factory and hung up a plasma with a roller and sits distributing booklets! That in 2002 I was there, that in 2011 there were no more new models of equipment except the tiger and lynx, on the contrary, it even decreased! The exhibition is degrading from year to year!
  8. Civil 13 September 2011 15: 51 New
    • 1
    • 0
    +1
    OOOO famous "secret" fire tank)))))
  9. Max
    Max 13 September 2011 15: 54 New
    • -2
    • 0
    -2
    Forget about the tanks, they have almost outlived themselves .. Now the emphasis will be on the Ka-52 and Mi-28 combat helicopters. They plan to build about 1000 in 2-3 years. One such vert will put several tanks at such a distance that they will not even have time to fart.
    1. Joker
      Joker 13 September 2011 15: 58 New
      • 5
      • 0
      +5
      Can a helicopter cover your position? Or hold fire (in the city limits for example)? A variety of anti-tank weapons only proves its value. In addition, no one canceled the air defense system. But helicopters are certainly needed.
    2. svvaulsh
      svvaulsh 13 September 2011 19: 56 New
      • 2
      • 0
      +2
      1000, this includes Mi-8 and all sorts of "Ansats." Do not forget that the combined arms battle is not a tank attack, but a balanced system of warfare, including military air defense, to protect the advancing (defending) units from army air strikes.
    3. Esso 13 September 2011 20: 14 New
      • 1
      • 0
      +1
      And one soldier with a modern man-portable air defense system can drive away our turntables. With a clash in an open field, our turntables do not argue with enemy tanks. But under other conditions?
      1. zczczc
        zczczc 13 September 2011 20: 17 New
        • 1
        • 0
        +1
        It is impossible to compare different arms and arms directly. They are effective only in interaction - some attack, others cover, and vice versa.
  10. figwam 13 September 2011 16: 01 New
    • 1
    • 0
    +1
    The tanks will remain, only the armament needs to be changed. A large number of universal guided missiles will allow him to fight with any kind of equipment, and the gun is obsolete.
    1. kagorta 13 September 2011 16: 04 New
      • 2
      • 0
      +2
      Expensive missiles, and shells cheaper because of this economy, the gun will not die for a long time.
      1. Joker
        Joker 13 September 2011 16: 10 New
        • 4
        • 0
        +4
        We have already passed purely missile tanks, IT-1 has not taken root.
      2. figwam 13 September 2011 16: 45 New
        • 1
        • 0
        +1
        On planes, the cannon remained, but as a secondary firearm in battle, the main missiles. Having left one gun, the tank is doomed. Compare how many shells are needed to suppress one target and how many missiles.

        Joker, New, well-forgotten old. At that time, missiles were not so effective.
        1. Joker
          Joker 13 September 2011 16: 55 New
          • 3
          • 0
          +3
          figwam

          Missile weapons of course should be, but I think that a tank is better to compare if it’s flying with a helicopter, and there the cannon (machine gun) is one of the main means.

          IMHO to supplement the machine gun on the roof with an anti-personnel grenade launcher. I think this will save ammunition, for example, you can comb the brilliant green (if thermobaric) and supplement the tanks with support vehicles with advanced missile weapons (BMPT, heavy infantry fighting vehicles, etc.).
          1. figwam 13 September 2011 17: 10 New
            • 1
            • 0
            +1
            What will happen to the column of advancing armored vehicles if enemy helicopters with anti-tank missiles come on them, plus drones will fly to them.
            1. Joker
              Joker 13 September 2011 17: 18 New
              • 2
              • 0
              +2
              And in the situation under consideration, a convoy with air defense systems?

              If there are no anti-aircraft guns, then the column n **** c.
              1. figwam 13 September 2011 17: 28 New
                • 2
                • 0
                +2
                So you answered my question. In this collision, in order to survive, the convoy needs air defense, and missile defense. You can’t trample a helicopter with a cannon against the missiles. You need to connect the tank to the Shell, with the ability to hit ground targets.
                Remember our convoy of equipment on 08.08.08., Georgian su-25s dropped freely falling bombs on them with impunity, and if they have modern helicopters and adjustable bombs and missiles?
                1. Joker
                  Joker 13 September 2011 17: 38 New
                  • 2
                  • 0
                  +2
                  Theoretically, a tank and a projectile with controlled detonation can cause damage to a helicopter, which means the whole question, or almost all in tracking systems (conditionally radar). It has decent dimensions and is quite vulnerable by tank standards. You can try placing a retractable lacquer on a support machine. Or do you mean the placement of the Igla block as on a stalker?

                  The conversation began with the fact that the cannon as the main weapon to cancel or not. I think it's too early to think about it.
                  1. kagorta 13 September 2011 19: 43 New
                    • 0
                    • 0
                    0
                    Theoretically, do not forget about invar. They can hit the helicopters through the barrel. But if you also hang an air defense system on the tank, it’s too heavy and enormous. There should be a battalion-tactical group with its own air defense, a brigade with its own air defense such as beech, and the corps (I just dream, all these brigades in my opinion only fight with the partisans) should cover the s-300.
                  2. figwam 13 September 2011 19: 46 New
                    • 1
                    • 0
                    +1
                    I think the right direction is chosen in the form of BMPT Terminator.
                    The gun may remain, but as a secondary weapon, missiles should be the main one, otherwise the tank will turn from an offensive weapon into a defensive one.
                    1. kagorta 13 September 2011 20: 08 New
                      • 1
                      • 0
                      +1
                      This is in the distant future, such a combat platform, with a radar, a bunch of missiles. And BMPT in our form, this is the wrong direction for a large crew, the missile unit is open and not protected, and it is primarily conceived to combat infantry. And just offer a tactical unit along with BMPT, as you see it.
                      1. svvaulsh
                        svvaulsh 13 September 2011 20: 19 New
                        • 0
                        • 0
                        0
                        I also asked such a question, but no one answered. In my opinion, a BMPT platoon in a tank company seems to be, although this will entail the development of new tactical techniques.
                      2. kagorta 13 September 2011 20: 22 New
                        • 0
                        • 0
                        0
                        Even if it is a Russian company with 10 tanks + three BMPTs, I don’t like something, since the load on the company commander will increase very much.
                      3. svvaulsh
                        svvaulsh 13 September 2011 20: 30 New
                        • 1
                        • 0
                        +1
                        You can fall to the squad in the platoon (not +, but instead). The commander is again in chocolate.
                      4. kagorta 13 September 2011 20: 42 New
                        • 0
                        • 0
                        0
                        For me, right now there should still be BTGs (battalion-tactical groups - a battalion of motorized rifles on heavy infantry fighting vehicles, only a 30mm cannon on an infantry fighting vehicle + tank company + artillery, covered by air defense either on their own or at the level of the brigade and UAV, platoon and company UAVs, like Raven Pindosovsky). A BMPT overload.
                2. figwam 13 September 2011 20: 42 New
                  • 0
                  • 0
                  0
                  BMPT, as the direction is correct, only rockets should be located inside the machine for about 20 pieces with the possibility of hitting ground equipment, helicopters and UAVs, a cannon, several machine guns to destroy manpower and lightly armored vehicles. Then such a unit can operate independently, otherwise the tanks will be attacked in the attack from the air with impunity.
                3. kagorta 13 September 2011 20: 54 New
                  • 0
                  • 0
                  0
                  How much will such a monster weigh?
                4. figwam 13 September 2011 21: 57 New
                  • 1
                  • 0
                  +1
                  The caliber of the gun is 30mm, there is no large turret, the defense is active armor. Tank missiles must hit all types of ground attacking equipment of the enemy within a radius of 6-8 km and all subsonic aircraft in height up to 5-7 km.
        2. Esso 13 September 2011 20: 23 New
          • 0
          • 0
          0
          But it’s better to hit the turntables with a guided missile.
      3. Esso 13 September 2011 20: 22 New
        • 0
        • 0
        0
        Firstly, the carapace can strike directly at the target. Secondly, there is an interesting version of the Slovenia T-72M1 Modern tank. It can have 2x30 2A42 guns on the sides of the tower. Thirdly, there will be a single tracked platform from the Armata tank, if it appears. you can put everything on it.
        Well, in the fourth. The columns moved haphazardly. Without support. There was no connection. Everybody got lost where. Air defense in one place of the motorized infantry in the third. This is not about air defense, but in organization and coordination.
        1. PSih2097 14 September 2011 16: 04 New
          • 0
          • 0
          0
          Secondly, there is an interesting version of the Slovenian T-72M1 Modern tank. It can have 2 X 30mm 2A42 guns on the sides of the tower. Third, there will be a single tracked platform from the Armata tank, if it appears. Here you can put everything on it.


          In general, for such things there is a tunguska and a shell that should be part of the tank units.
  11. avdkrd 3 November 2011 13: 44 New
    • 0
    • 0
    0
    with a column of armored vehicles (unless of course this is a target), the following will happen: it will be dispersed before the air targets fly up, and regular anti-aircraft systems will begin to methodically destroy air targets. Each tank regiment has an anti-aircraft division, whose task is to provide cover for armored vehicles on the march and even in battle. Of course, to combat UAVs, appropriate equipment is required. It exists (developed), poorly. that it’s almost absent in the troops (I mean Armor), but let’s say the Tungusks do an excellent job of detecting and destroying small-sized aircraft.
  • svvaulsh
    svvaulsh 13 September 2011 20: 02 New
    • 0
    • 0
    0
    Quote: figvam
    On planes, the gun remained, but as a secondary firearm

    And when intercepting balloons, we used guns with highly sensitive air defense, because the missiles were ineffective, and in the warhead the gun is much more convenient than missiles. So I don’t agree about the secondary.
  • Max
    Max 13 September 2011 16: 23 New
    • -3
    • 0
    -3
    Werth is harder to hit. he has higher maneuverability and a longer range. Tanks are definitely needed during battles in the city and to cover infantry. But when fighting in an open area, the tank battalion will demolish several kaeks and mikes in 10 minutes, and neither the tanks themselves nor the air defense system operators will understand where the attack came from.
    1. PSih2097 14 September 2011 23: 11 New
      • 0
      • 0
      0
      Do you even understand what you wrote?
      C'mon, Tunguska makes no difference to its (helicopter) maneuverability, like its shell.
  • Maksim
    Maksim 13 September 2011 19: 38 New
    • 2
    • 0
    +2
    If Russia doused so much money into military equipment as the United States invests, then the technology would be the best in the world, but I do not say that Russia has a bad one, I really like it! God forbid, sooner or unexpectedly in Russia, the best military equipment in the whole world.
    1. Esso 13 September 2011 20: 10 New
      • 5
      • 0
      +5
      With the help of a hammer, brake fluid and a pair of swear words. Our brave tankers will repair any engine in any conditions.
  • datur 13 September 2011 20: 39 New
    • 0
    • 0
    0
    Khokhlyatsky flurry is not bad, but in my KBPshny module for BMP will be better.
    1. Esso 13 September 2011 21: 33 New
      • 1
      • 0
      +1
      It seems that we were interested in a flurry. But why take this all outdated option. We have something similar. But the base of the bmp is outdated. You can put it if you really want to buy these modules on our bmp. But it will not fix the car. Then they will be heard on the air phrases. "I am injured, BMP incapacitation ... help needed."
    2. Rustam 14 September 2011 00: 35 New
      • 0
      • 0
      0
      not a fact !!! a flurry of what is good (this is the modernization of a huge number of BMP-1s and especially BMP-2s which are in service with our army, there is still a saving, but this is a specific module and is not needed in large quantities
  • sergant89 13 September 2011 21: 29 New
    • 0
    • 0
    0
    IT'S ABOUT MONEY INVESTMENT IN THE ARMY The President of the Russian Federation promised the rearmament of the army for 20 trillion rubles, according to Kudrin, has no sources of funding [b].] “The announced number of 20 trillions in the long run is now, in principle, not provided with sources at all. This means that this will require a tax increase, ”said the head of the Ministry of Finance. recourseSomeone was talking about a thousand helicopters, here they are.
  • rumpeljschtizhen 15 September 2011 17: 57 New
    • 0
    • 0
    0
    it is strange that there is no review about the 2011 England exhibition DSEi
  • frame5 16 September 2011 23: 34 New
    • 0
    • 0
    0
    Russian developments are quite capable of competing with foreign counterparts. For example, wheeled armored personnel carrier BTR-82A


    If only for cheapness. The whole world is trying with all its might to increase armor protection and explosive resistance of armored personnel carriers, and our fellows put a new tower on a cardboard coffin.
  • mark021105 22 September 2011 18: 57 New
    • 0
    • 0
    0
    The main thing is that the State REALLY invests in Defense.