292 object, caliber 152,4 mm

15
One of the main combat tasks of modern tank is a guaranteed defeat not only of already existing models of armored vehicles of a potential enemy, but also those that, given the prospect of modernization, may appear in the near future. Increasing the power of the main armament of an armored car is one way to solve this problem. Towards the end of the 80s of the last century, prerequisites appeared that suggested that the USSR began to lose its position as a leader in world tank building powers, therefore, engineers and tank designers of the Soviet Union, realizing the need to increase the firepower of domestic tanks produced in series, were actively looking for various opportunities for them modernization and improvement. In addition to work on creating machines with an uninhabited tower, work was carried out all over the world in the direction of installing high-powered guns in an inhabited tower.

292 object, caliber 152,4 mm


The development of a new main battle tank, designated the “292 object”, is a prime example of advancing design thinking in this direction. “Object-292” was created by a group of Soviet engineers of the design bureau of the Leningrad Kirov Plant (now JSC “Spetsmash”) together with scientists and engineers of the VNII “Transmash”. The general management of the work was carried out by the general designer N.S. Popov, A.K. Dziavgo, it was he who later will tell you that originally it was planned to install an 152,4-mm rifled gun on a tank. The ballistic performance of the 152,4-mm guns was better than that of the 125-mm, but its dimensions did not allow it to be installed in the “native” T-80 tower. From his statement: “We agreed with the director of the Petrel Research Institute (the Petrel Research Institute) (it was in this Central Research Institute that work was carried out to create a rifled gun) N.N. Khudkov on the implementation of ideas for the development of six-inch rifled gun caliber 152,4 mm. We liked this idea not only because it is one of the main calibers of land and naval artillery, and, therefore, in the future highly unified, but also because it made it possible to use a projectile of increased power to fight tanks, helicopters and infantry . But soon it was necessary to correct the intended plan - the supporters of the smooth-bore cannon “won” ... ”. It can be added that another reason for which it was decided to abandon the rifled gun in favor of a smooth-bore gun was the fact that after the collapse of the USSR all the funding aimed at its creation was discontinued.



The first and only copy of the OBT "Object-292" was built in September 1990. The prototype was a machine created on the basis of the T-80U tank chassis (undercarriage, body booking, individual torsion bar suspension design - everything was left unchanged). In fact, it was a T-80U with a new, specially designed turret installed, capable of holding a 152,4-mm cannon. Also from the T-80U "Object-292" differed in the design of the fighting compartment. A characteristic feature of the new design was the thoughtful location of the ammunition, it was placed in a special turret niche, which reduced the risk of detonation of the ammunition during the penetration of the frontal armor of the tower. In 1991, the new tank was tested at the Rzhevsky range, and, according to experts, the car showed excellent fighting qualities. This showed that the idea of ​​installing an 152,4 mm tank on a tank is a quite feasible task and has the right to continue to exist.

All work was carried out under the direction of General Designer N.S. Popov. His deputy, twice State Prize winner A.K. Dziavgo, said: “We agreed with the director of the Central Research Institute Nikolai Nikolayevich Khudkov on the implementation of the idea of ​​developing a six-inch rifled gun with 152,4 mm caliber. We liked this idea not only because it is one of the main calibers of land and naval artillery, and, therefore, in the future highly unified, but also because it made it possible to use a projectile of increased power to fight tanks, helicopters and infantry . But soon it was necessary to correct the intended plan - the supporters of the smooth-bore cannon “won”. However, this only increased the pace of work. ”



The creation of a sample of a tank armed with a cannon more than 125 mm refuted the existing opinion that the 140 mm limit for tank guns, after which insurmountable obstacles in the form of low survivability and plastic deformation of the barrel arise. In addition to the cannon, it was allegedly planned to install one 7,62-mm machine gun and ATGM on the tank. However, due to subsequent events in the USSR, then the “Object-292” events were never brought to adoption and launch into mass production, remaining in a single copy. It is difficult to say now what the further fate of this unusual tank would be if the Soviet Union had not collapsed and the work on the project had been brought to its logical conclusion. But it can be argued that the majority of the results obtained during its creation will be seen in future samples of both domestic and foreign tank building. "Object-292", in essence, is a transitional model in the process of creating a fourth-generation tank.
15 comments
Information
Dear reader, to leave comments on the publication, you must sign in.
  1. +4
    2 December 2011 10: 03
    according to experts, the car showed excellent fighting qualities.

    But the series did not go. It is necessary to introduce article 58 in CC
    1. 0
      2 December 2011 11: 06
      Interestingly, protection as they experienced ???
  2. 0
    2 December 2011 11: 53
    With all due respect, the 152 mm gun in the tank is too much. Especially rifled.
    1. +1
      2 December 2011 14: 12
      Quote: Andrey77
      152 mm gun in the tank - bust. T


      Yes, I understand, Andrey, but how convenient it is, I mean unification. In addition, remember the KV-2 with a 152 mm tank howitzer mod. 1938/40 Unfortunately, the technology of that time did not allow to create a full-fledged car
      1. Phoenixl
        +1
        2 December 2011 14: 18
        Where I read that there is no unification
        The same caliber and no more i.e. shells do not fit
    2. 0
      10 September 2015 09: 05
      Quote: Andrey77
      With all due respect, the 152 mm gun in the tank is too much. Especially rifled.

      This is not busting but what you need.
  3. mamadey
    0
    2 December 2011 12: 25
    so they didn’t put a word on God to the series. In RUSSIA, they still know how to make a medium-sized tank (up to 60 tons) aircraft and missiles. NADO an average tank on a gas turbine engine of up to 100 km / h and 152 mm smoothbore fluff so that rockets can be naughty by 10 km.
    1. Phoenixl
      0
      2 December 2011 14: 14
      GTE theme failed
      And where did you see the 10km line of sight? I doubt that there are many cases when you can shoot a rocket at 5km.

      You still write that instead of PCT you need KPVT
  4. Artemka
    -3
    2 December 2011 13: 14
    The gas turbine engine is very picky, this one stands on Abrams and that eats a lot, the sand is packed into the filters and the whole tank rises.
  5. ESCANDER
    +3
    2 December 2011 14: 25
    In my opinion, it is not necessary to take in caliber, but in the quality of ammunition and explosives, which we have always been lame in.
    And without increasing the caliber to increase the power of BP reserves abound.
  6. 0
    2 December 2011 15: 28
    152.4 mm rifled cannon .... I would like to see an abram or fourth merkava which will get from such a gun)
    1. +4
      2 December 2011 17: 59
      Quote: Dimka off
      I would like to see the abram or the fourth merkava which will get from such a gun)


      Go to the trash



      Hit in a German tank (most likely Pz.lV.) 152 mm shell ISU-152



      And "Hummel" in Konigsberg
      1. 0
        3 December 2011 12: 36
        thank you)
  7. dred
    0
    12 December 2011 17: 28
    Diesel is the best GTD proved by the pendos.
    1. Gromila78
      +1
      9 March 2012 14: 26
      During the trial operation of the T64, T-72 and T-80 (as far as I remember, the battalions tested), the state commission came to the conclusion that it was necessary to create a single tank on the T-80 chassis, the T-72 tower and the T-64 combat control system, i.e. proved its advantage. In general, Tagil knows how to advertise his products and likes to trample competitors in the mud. For comparison, the specific power of the T-80U is 27,1 hp / t, the T-90 is 21,5 hp / t (engine power / mass) - here you have the diesel, hence the deterioration of maneuverability.
  8. 0
    26 December 2011 21: 21
    I believe that the tank needs to stop for firing with such a caliber, and even a rifled barrel, on the move when it is fired, it will probably blow the tower. and a standing tank is a wrecked tank.
  9. 0
    8 May 2016 10: 07
    I saw him in Cuban last year. handsome man