US develops EW system

18
The rapid development of anti-ship weapons leads to the need to create appropriate means of protection. The main similar means are anti-aircraft missile and artillery systems designed to intercept missiles approaching the ship. Nevertheless, the developers of advanced protection systems do not forget about other means of counteraction. At present, preliminary work is being carried out in the United States on the AOEW project, the goal of which is to develop a new electronic warfare system.



The beginning of the development of the AOEW (Advance Off-board Electronic Warfare) complex was announced in mid-April of this year. The command of the US Navy wants to get a new EW system designed to be installed on existing deck helicopters and capable of suppressing enemy radio channels and interfering with the operation of its radio electronic equipment. According to official data, the helicopter MH-60R or MH-60S is supposed to be used as the carrier of the new system, and its main task will be to counter enemy controlled weapons.

Unfortunately, the basic requirements for the prospective system, as well as its intended appearance, have not yet been announced. Detailed information on the requirements of the US Navy is classified and transmitted only to companies and organizations that have expressed a desire to participate in the competition. Which companies received a package of secret documents is unknown.

As far as is known, in the past few months, the relevant management of the US Navy received a number of requests and sent out the necessary information. Tentatively, until the end of autumn, the companies participating in the tender were to submit their proposals. The AOEW project developer was supposed to be identified at the beginning of November, but so far the winner of the competition has not been officially announced.

Based on fragmentary data, you can try to determine the approximate appearance of the promising EW AOEW complex, as well as present the main prerequisites for the beginning of its development. There is reason to believe that the AOEW system will be made in the form of a container suitable for installation on various aircraft. Initially, its carrier will be helicopters available in the naval forces, and then, probably, airplanes and prospective unmanned aerial vehicles will be used as such.

Taking into account the proposed tasks, it can be argued that the main purpose of the AOEW system will be to counteract the operation of the radar homing heads of various anti-ship missiles. Ammunition of this class in most cases equipped with radar homing, providing accurate guidance to surface targets. Due to interference, AOEW systems installed on helicopters must “blind” the missiles' homing missiles and thereby disrupt the attack.

In the foreign press, suggestions are made about the reasons for starting the development of the AOEW complex. It is quite possible that American specialists have to start developing a new electronic warfare system due to the recent successes of the Russian and foreign defense industry. There are several types of modern high-performance anti-ship missiles in Russia and a number of other countries. It is the presence of such missiles may be one of the reasons for the start of the development of promising EW tools.

In the context of the AOEW system, the Russian anti-ship missile P-800 "Onyx" and its export version called "Yakhont" are sometimes mentioned. This rocket can be used as a weapon for coastal complexes, surface ships and submarines. Depending on the flight path, the P-800 rocket can accelerate to a speed of about 750 m / s and fly to a range of about 300 km. The missile delivers a warhead to the 300-kg target. The missile’s flight to the target area is carried out using an inertial guidance system, and an active-passive radar seeker is responsible for finding and destroying the target.

The further development of the Onyx rocket is the BrahMos product developed by Russian and Indian specialists. By its basic characteristics, this rocket is similar to the base P-800 and differs from it primarily from a technological point of view. Since the beginning of the two thousandth rocket "BrahMos" operated by the armed forces of India. A new anti-ship missile with even higher performance is currently under development.



The high speed and long range of the “Onyx” or “BrahMos” missiles, as well as the peculiarities of the homing head and the great power of the warhead seriously hamper their interception. All existing shipboard anti-aircraft systems have limitations on the maximum speed of the intercepted target and on the radius of action. In addition, the scale of a massive missile strike may exceed the capabilities of defense systems, with the result that some of the missiles will be shot down, but some will be able to break through to the target.

Thus, for effective protection against enemy anti-ship missiles, a ship must have not only anti-aircraft systems, but also electronic warfare equipment. Modern ships of leading countries carry similar equipment, which makes it difficult to detect and attack them. The AOEW complex is proposed to be mounted not on ships, but on helicopters. Probably, this way of using the system is proposed to expand the capabilities of its own ship systems.

A helicopter capable of operating at some distance from the base ship will improve the effectiveness of the combat use of the EW system. If necessary, the helicopter or helicopters will be able to carry out jamming, being at a certain distance from the ship and covering the dangerous direction. In this case, the protected ship or compound will have some time left in case the AOEW helicopter complex fails to interrupt the attack of all launched missiles.

In early November, it was planned to complete the analysis of the proposals received from the competing companies. Most likely, the US Navy has already made its choice, but has not yet announced its decision. Who exactly will be engaged in the development of a promising complex of electronic warfare - will be announced later.


On the materials of the sites:
http://militaryaerospace.com/
https://fbo.gov/
http://janes.com/
18 comments
Information
Dear reader, to leave comments on the publication, you must sign in.
  1. 0
    10 December 2014 07: 50
    They boasted that they had intercepted the onyx, it was possible that at an approach height of 3 meters at a speed of 2,5 ... 3 Machs were able to intercept or, as always, corrected a little.
    1. +3
      10 December 2014 09: 33
      Quote: bmv04636
      Really at an approach height of 3 meters at a speed of 2,5 ... 3 Mach

      Are you out of your mind? At a height of 3 meters, they do not fly at such a speed. On 3M "Onyx" flies at an altitude of 12 km ....
      1. 0
        10 December 2014 12: 14
        Quote: Nayhas
        At a height of 3 meters, they do not fly at this speed.

        Onyx has a surface velocity of 700 m / s. And this is 2500 km \ h.
    2. 0
      10 December 2014 09: 55
      Why "corrected as always"?
      1. 0
        10 December 2014 11: 09
        as I read about the Austrolisk jamming system based on UAVs
        1. 0
          10 December 2014 11: 57
          [media = http: //pentagonus.ru/navy/1998/1998-12-6.gif] In accordance with the agreement between the naval forces of the USA and Australia, the American company Sippican and the Australian ABA Defense Industries developed an individual protect the ship from anti-ship missiles (RBIs), called the "Nulka". It should ensure the effective evasion of the ship from attacking RBIs equipped with promising radar homing heads (GOS radar), due to the setting of false targets (LC) with the use of electronic suppression (REP) means. "Nulka", which was developed taking into account the experience of the combat use of LCs by American ships in the Persian Gulf, is intended to equip main surface combat ships.

          Fig. 1. The layout of the target-missile jamming system "Nulka"

          Fig. 2. The shipborne jamming system “Nulka” (the variant of its use for protection against RCC is given):
          1-target missile; 2 - ship fire control system; 3 - PU; 4 - firing control unit; 5 anti-ship missile

          The composition of this system includes: a set of one-time false targets (missiles with REP equipment), launchers (PU) and a firing control unit, which, like the REP equipment, was developed by an American company, and the rocket and launcher are Australian.
  2. 0
    10 December 2014 08: 02
    Everywhere confrontation - on land armor-shell, here and in the sky, orientation and positioning systems, communication and confrontation with electronic warfare systems!
    It would not be peaceful to create everything!
  3. +5
    10 December 2014 08: 47
    The United States wants to get a new electronic warfare system designed for installation on existing deck helicopters


    Once we had electronic warfare in a helicopter.

    Created in 1974, the Mi-8PP electronic warfare helicopter with the Pole complex was intended for jamming ground-based radar for detection, guidance and target designation. Suppression stations located on the helicopter also made it possible to use the Mi-8PP as a radio reconnaissance officer. The helicopter is easily distinguished by its container and cross-shaped dipole antennas on the sides of the fuselage. The modification adopted for service was subjected to in 1980 and 1982. improvements, resulting in a new modification of the Mi-8PPA.
    1. +1
      10 December 2014 09: 35
      Quote: Athenogen
      Created in 1974, the Mi-8PP electronic warfare helicopter with the Pole complex was intended for jamming ground-based radar for detection, guidance and target designation.

      And how will he help in the fight against anti-ship cruise missiles?
      1. 0
        10 December 2014 11: 00
        Quote: Nayhas
        And how will he help in the fight against anti-ship cruise missiles?



        He will no longer help with anything, this is the past, they probably wrote off for a long time and disassembled the equipment of the 70s. But it’s interesting, now in Russia there are modern EW developments in helicopters?
  4. +1
    10 December 2014 09: 48
    Specifically, this is no. But, in principle, under the X-band there was something flying
    1. 0
      10 December 2014 10: 20
      Quote: sivuch
      Specifically, this is no. But, in principle, under the X-band there was something flying

      Do you understand that Romeo’s new electronic warfare will be part of the avionics without replacing the PLO equipment? Mi-8PP is completely clogged with electronic warfare equipment and is no longer able to perform any functions, what for its analogue wasted on board?
      1. 0
        10 December 2014 11: 57
        A man asked about helicopter electronic warfare systems in general, and not specifically about offshore helicopters. Naturally, land Mi-8SMV-PGs cannot be put on a ship.
        Yes, and sense, in my opinion, no
  5. +2
    10 December 2014 11: 29
    I can hardly imagine how a helicopter with its response time can help in disrupting the attack of supersonic anti-ship missiles. Only if it is specifically displayed on the likely direction of the attack. At the same time, anti-ship missiles will attack the order from different directions, if it is a volley of several missiles. Multiple guidance channels will greatly reduce suppression. Missiles also use passive channels for guidance, including interference.
  6. -2
    10 December 2014 14: 18
    SCARED then just ONE SHIP and then the whole team Described! and then they decided to Catch us)))
  7. +1
    10 December 2014 21: 28
    Can you imagine what a contrasting thermal target a ship has against a background of water? I doubt that the creators of the RCC did not take this into account.
    1. 0
      11 December 2014 00: 23
      Of course, this is taken into account. He served in the Navy in the late 80s. I’ll tell you what I saw myself.
      1) Evasion of a torpedo attack. At the signal of the acoustics (attack detection), an anti-torpedo maneuver is carried out. A container is fired into the water. (We looked at its contents like aluminum powder.) When it enters the water, a metal spot the size of an aircraft carrier forms almost instantly on the surface of the water. (calculation on the selectivity of the torpedo. Choose a larger target). A noise simulator goes into the same spot. (Noisy specifically, as an acoustics I say). The ship at this time increases speed to maximum and makes zigzag maneuvers in different directions.
      2) Avoidance of a missile attack. At the signal of the radiometers, the same actions occur as with the torpedo. But with the additions. In addition to a large metal spot, two shells of the PK-10 and PK-16 installations are fired from the ship. One gives a foil wall with burning pieces. This temperature wall hangs for about 3-4 minutes. The second shell at break gives a cloud of small fiberglass fibers (well, in appearance it seemed). The ship at this time at full speed leaves from this wall.
      In general, conditions are being created for GOS missiles for volume, temperature, and metal. And believe me, this happens very very quickly, a maximum of a minute and a half. I think modern systems are much better. And do not forget about active protection, i.e. Air defense, anti-aircraft defense, etc.
    2. +1
      11 December 2014 00: 34
      By the way, this is what a wall of burning pieces of foil looks like. The temperature is much higher than that of a ship against the background of water. GOS missiles will go nowhere. PC-16 shot.
      1. +1
        11 December 2014 00: 49
        And so he sees the GOS thermal guidance missiles. As you know, she does not see the ship. It should be noted that in the same place there is a huge metal spot, a cloud of optical dust (creates volume), sometimes inflatable corner reflectors are shot. This is for other guidance systems of the same rocket. Those. it’s possible in principle to fool a rocket. But of course, electronic warfare facilities also need to be improved.
  8. Vita_vko
    0
    10 December 2014 22: 10
    By all standards, interfering with communication and control systems is considered an act of aggression. For the air defense forces, this is a clear signal of the beginning of a massive strike. Therefore, the problem with jammers should be resolved quickly and radically with the help of X-58UShKE type missiles, which will come complete with the Yakhont (Onyx) system.
  9. +3
    10 December 2014 22: 55
    US develops EW system

    Will she help them?