Old air defense systems continue to maintain their effectiveness.

22
Old air defense systems continue to maintain their effectiveness.


The recent shooting by the Russian Ministry of Defense proved the effectiveness of the use of the Osa anti-aircraft missile system manufactured by 70. Parts of the air defense forces demonstrated the Osa anti-aircraft complex in action. This complex is the oldest and most common in the modern Russian army. "Wasps" entered service with the army of the Soviet Union in 1974 year. Since then, "Wasp" serves faithfully to our military and sailors. Currently, more than 400 of such systems are on duty. "Wasps" reliably cover ground and surface objects from possible air strikes.

Historical reference

"Wasp" (NATO classification: SA-8Gecko-Gecko) is an automated combined-arms anti-aircraft missile system made in the USSR. The complex is used in all weather conditions and is designed to provide cover for the forces and means of motorized rifle (tank) divisions in any type of combat. The development of the complex began in October 1960. According to the decree of the USSR Council of Ministers No. 1157-487 dated 27.07.1960/1962/XNUMX, work has begun on the creation of an air defense missile system under the code name "Wasp" (in the process of elaborating the requirements, this project was temporarily called "Ellipsoid"). The work was carried out sometimes hard, the deadlines were constantly missed. Therefore, by XNUMX, the development process had not even passed the stage of laboratory experimental verification.

The complex was developed mainly on the basis of SRI-20 GKRE under the supervision of the chief designer M.M. Kosichkina. For the creation of missiles for the complex was responsible Tushinsky engineering plant. Above the launcher worked design office compressor engineering at GKAT.

The Tushinsky Ministry of Health did not reach the set deadlines, therefore, in September 1964, by a decision of the Central Committee of the CPSU and the USSR Council of Ministers, all the work on the missile defense was appointed by the OKB-2, led by PDGushin. A new date was set for the launch of an air defense missile system for testing: the spring of the year 1970. In addition, the post of the chief designer of "Wasps" was taken by V.P.Efremov, and his deputy - I.M. Drizay. The wheel chassis for the OSA Osa was developed at the Bryansk Automobile Plant. In the spring of 1970, the Osa air defense system passed scheduled annual tests. The adoption of the "Wasps" was adopted through 11 years after the start of work on its creation: in October 1971.

The complexes began to actively enter into service with the army by 1974. However, in the 1989 year, the production of "Os" completely stopped, but the complex remained the most common in the armed forces to this day. At the beginning of 2008, the Wasp was recognized as the most numerous means of military air defense in Russia.

The complex is equipped with 4. 9M33 guided missiles, and Osa-AK and Osa-AKM versions - 6. missiles brands 9М33М2 and 9М33М3 respectively.

Osa rocket hit Tomahawk

According to the newspaper "Izvestia", air defense specialists of the Land Forces of the Russian Federation demonstrated the capabilities of the Osa anti-aircraft complex. In the course of the exercises, “Wasp” successfully coped with simulators of tactical missiles of the ATACMS system (analogue of the domestic Iskander) and the famous cruise missile from the US Tomahawk (analogue of our X55). - The exercises were conducted in difficult weather conditions: during a dust storm and heat, reaching 50 degrees.

The representative of the Ground Forces of the Russian Federation, Viktor Dvoinov: "Units that imitate the enemy, littered the radio with interference, despite this the system showed excellent fighting qualities."

However, despite accurate hits, the experts doubt, exactly the “Wasps” in real combat.

According to Igor Korotchenko, editor of the National Defense magazine, the target missiles used in such exercises do not provide a complete picture of how the original Tomahawk behaves in the event of an attack. During the exercises in Kapustin Yar, the role of the Tomahawk cruise missile was played by one of the very first Russian anti-aircraft systems, the Berkut C-25, and the tactical ATACMS, by the Saman rocket.

The military assure that the flight characteristics of these missiles are completely identical to the flight parameters of the American originals. According to the representative of the Ground Forces, it is not at all necessary that the training objective should look just like a potential enemy rocket. It is much more important that the target move at the same speed and along the same trajectory as the original. The representative added that for programming the trajectory of the training targets, data from real flights of cruise and tactical Tomahawk missiles and during their use by NATO forces during operations in Yugoslavia and Iraq were used.

"Saman", which imitated ATACMS, had a speed of 600 m / s, and "Wasp" hit it through 40 seconds after the start. During the exercise, other air defense systems were also tested: transported by Buk, Thor, Tunguska, C-300В and portable Igla and Strela-10. By 2020, these complexes should be replaced with new ones: “Tunguska” will be replaced by “Armor”, “Buk” - by “Vityaz”, C-300 - by C-400. And the "Wasp", it seems, will continue to carry on combat duty further.
22 comments
Information
Dear reader, to leave comments on the publication, you must sign in.
  1. +4
    26 August 2011 09: 23
    What's this? Perdyukovites are trying to convince that you can fight with old weapons? So let's put ERA on the T-34-85, load it with shells and go into battle. "Abrams" and "Leopards" also move at the same speed and along the same trajectories as "Tigers" with "Panthers"
    1. His
      0
      27 August 2011 12: 26
      The main thing is in what hands it is. Arabs at least tamahawks give no sense to them, savages
    2. +2
      13 February 2012 10: 47
      1. Tomahawk, too, was not invented yesterday.
      2. The principle of operation of rockets differs little from those that were then
      3. With the same success can be attributed: Makarov and Stechkin pistols, AK, T-72, Mi 8 / 24 and a bunch of other weapons.

      Conclusion: as long as weapons meet modern requirements, obsolescence means little.
      PS But this does not mean that it is not necessary to create new samples.
    3. lars
      +1
      10 March 2012 19: 31
      The Serbs knocked down the "invisible" Neva.
  2. 0
    26 August 2011 09: 29
    famous cruise missile from the US "Tomahawk" (analogue of our X55)

    Tomahawk was adopted in March 1983, and ХХNUMX in December of the same year. Therefore, rather, the X55 analogue of Tomahawk, and not as stated here.

    It was necessary to check the combat capability of the complex, which was ceased to be produced in 1989, in the mode of using modern EW tools. And only if successful, declare:
    And the "Wasp", it seems, will continue to carry on combat duty further.
    1. Superduck
      0
      26 August 2011 10: 56
      Recently Belarus demonstrated the modernization of the T38 Stiletto wasp. The new Ukrainian missiles from the Luch Design Bureau are almost ready for it.
      Features:
      It affects those moving at speeds of up to 900 m / s at altitudes of 0,025-10 km. The probability of hitting a target of one SAM, is 0,9, the maximum slant range of hitting targets is 20 km, and the maximum course parameter of hitting targets is 10 km. Coagulation / deployment time of SAM - 5 min.
      Standard Wasp:
      The complex was intended to hit targets flying at altitudes from 50 - 100 m to 5 km at a speed of up to 500 m / s at ranges from 0,8-1 km to 8-10 km.
      Those. normal, indicators are increased, on paper almost 2 times.
      However, experts say that the noise immunity of a standard Wasp is lower than the plinth.
      1. 0
        26 August 2011 19: 40
        However, experts say that the noise immunity of a standard Wasp is lower than the plinth.

        I'm just about that.
  3. -1
    26 August 2011 11: 19
    Weapon lovers for the Papuans
    http://gunm.ru/news/bgm_109_tomahawk/2011-03-22-139
  4. 0
    26 August 2011 15: 19
    but Tomuszaw’s and their lot later .... and this is a problem
  5. Dvormen
    0
    26 August 2011 17: 55
    And what to do if you can’t see anything new in realities. Matroskin, + 5!
    1. Superduck
      0
      26 August 2011 19: 44
      Well, as I understand it - the shell is in the same segment and is completely new and modern.
      1. Insurgent
        0
        27 August 2011 09: 56
        and how many of these shells?
        1. Daniil
          0
          27 August 2011 10: 55
          6 pieces for sure - they were shown at the parade ...
      2. His
        +2
        27 August 2011 13: 15
        Watch the series shock force, there is an interview with designers. Better to listen to specialists
        1. Superduck
          -1
          28 August 2011 23: 23
          My friend, striking force and military secret are precisely those programs that are not worth quoting in a decent society.
  6. +5
    28 August 2011 23: 37
    The good news is that during the exercises, the alleged enemy is no longer disguised as illegal armed groups with which we fought in the Caucasus.
    1. Marat
      +2
      29 August 2011 00: 08
      Great comment, Figwam! Yes, I remember - my friends and I often laughed - when in "perestroika and democracy" all the exercises - even with the use of aviation and air defense bashfully called anti-terrorism.

      They discussed a lot - what kind of terrorists are these with aviation, the means of the reb

      I especially liked it when the terrorists were mentioned during the joint maneuvers of Russia and China a few years ago - I watched on TV (obviously to reflect the landing from the ocean) The exercises envisaged counteracting the satellites of the "terrorists" of their aviation and the sea landing of the same "terrorists"
      1. +2
        29 August 2011 19: 42
        Here, here I am about the same thing, if they were hiding the truth then, they were afraid to admit that the Cold War was continuing, now something had changed in my head.
  7. mga04
    +2
    15 September 2011 16: 25
    We saw the effectiveness of the Wasp in Libya.
    1. 0
      30 September 2011 10: 06
      Exactly, the effectiveness against modern electronic warfare is lower than the baseboard, and our military just wants to put money in their pocket and not buy shells ... and they don’t need new tanks, like now nobody is fighting them, we’ll reflect aggression on the 72-st streets .. and new purely for the parade of pieces 5 buy so be it ..
      If the military-industrial complex is not in demand in its homeland, how can other countries evaluate it .. here the demand falls ..

      In modern conditions, the armed forces of the same Syria, Iran, and the former Libya, have a greater combat readiness than ours, they at least actively use what they have, for comparison, pilots collect 30-40 flight hours per year, NATO 250-300, and Hindus and even more.
      1. 0
        23 October 2011 19: 54
        So let the troops train on what they have, on the "Wasps" or on the "Wasps". In this case, they will still be of greater use in a combat situation. They can't sit in the barracks and eat up the military budget.
        And the fact that it is necessary to purchase more advanced systems for the army, I think the author of the article does not deny.
  8. Railways
    +1
    4 March 2012 09: 12
    The reaction time is long for her, about 10 seconds it seems that the OSA-AKM can fire both on planes and helicopters on the ground, the main thing is that the engine would work. She swims is also a plus. Generally a great thing. High noise immunity.
  9. saramb
    0
    22 November 2013 00: 33
    The carapace does not replace Tunguska, it has a place in the cover of airfields and other infrastructure facilities, and Tunguska should be left in infantry regiments and tank formations due to its patency.