BMPT (Tank Support Fighting Vehicle) "99 Frame" - Terminator

13
Mud and puddles Tanks Do not be afraid on their own. But so that they would not be afraid of a sniper with a grenade launcher, who sat on a tree, this tank support machine was invented. Although it would be more honest to call the “Frame 99” a death machine.

TTX BMPT "Frame-99"

Combat weight - 47 t
Crew - 3 person
Engine - a multi-fuel diesel B-92C2, 740.31-240 with a turbocharger 1000 l. with.
Speed, max - 65 km / h
Power reserve - 550 km
Armament - two 30-mm automatic guns 2А42, a PKTM machine gun and a PKT machine gun or a 7,62-mm machine gun or two 30-mm AG-17D grenade launcher and the Kornet PT-TUR



The fruit of mutual love "Uralvagonzavod" and "Ural Bureau of Transport Engineering" - the first in its class tank support fighting machine. The official name is like a Soviet haircut, by golly: “Frame-99”. However, the military quickly renamed the new product to the "Terminator" - this is more solid, and more accurately conveys the purpose of the car. The power of its weapons is crushing: here you have both guns, and four launchers for anti-tank missiles, and a machine gun, and automatic grenade launchers. BMPT per minute can shoot nine hundred 30-mm projectiles, six hundred 30-mm grenades and two thousand 7,62-mm bullets, and enough ammunition to burn everything alive on an area of ​​3 square. km Needless to say, BMPT missiles pierce the armor of any tanks and concrete bunkers at a distance of 5 km, and can also shoot down a helicopter and even low-flying enemy aircraft. Well, the AG-17 grenade launchers with a mounted grenade trajectory ensure the destruction of targets in the trenches in the area up to 1 km.

Start developing BMPT military forced the changed conditions of warfare. Previously, we naively prepared for some kind of global confrontation of tank armadas, but now life compels us to fight with partisans or militants. You probably remember what losses we had in tanks and BMPs during the storming of Grozny in 1995 year. When any building serves as an ideal shelter for a grenade launcher, the tank does not last long. So, it is necessary to give him something to help him, which would quickly and often solve the walls of houses, turning them into mincers of enemies hiding behind them. It would be nice to cover this “something” with reliable armor. Based on such considerations, the designers created the “Frame” based on the famous T-90 tank, providing it with a multi-fuel engine for a thousand “horses”. It is impossible to get away from the “Frame” even in potholes: a car rushing at a speed of 60 km / h jumps over three-meter-long ditches and crawls easily through one-and-a-half-meter walls!

By the way, being a completely new type of weapons, the BMPT does not fall under the cuts under the CFE Treaty (the treaty on conventional armed forces in Europe). This class of equipment simply did not exist at the time of drawing up the contract, because “Frame-99” is not a tank or an armored vehicle. So, no one will forbid us to stock them more.



Photos from the site http://btvt.narod.ru

13 comments
Information
Dear reader, to leave comments on the publication, you must sign in.
  1. Eugene
    0
    3 July 2010 16: 38
    And how much is this "MIRACLE".
  2. 0
    31 March 2011 14: 56
    SHELEZYAK
  3. 0
    14 November 2011 01: 17
    Already a heart beat! The charm! But what is she in battle, to know ...
    1. 0
      14 November 2011 01: 23
      You do not know in any way, they will not be purchased.
  4. dred
    0
    2 January 2012 17: 21
    It is in service with Kazakhstan.
  5. +1
    26 July 2012 02: 09
    What is this piece of hardware intended for? Can it replace infantry and can tanks attack without motorized rifles now?
    But tanks without infantry are a pile of metal. Infantry without tanks is a mountain of corpses.
    And this crap is just a waste of a meager military budget, under a "noble" pretext.
  6. Odessa16
    0
    31 October 2012 18: 54
    The machine, of course, is not so hot, as the relevant department very correctly emphasized, but you should not completely abandon it. In the end, it's better with this car than without it. But in my opinion - there are few channels of fire. AG have a small angle, the removed AP module and ATGM are poorly protected. You need to install the AG in small swivel turrets (with a firing angle of 0-135 degrees horizontally and -5 +45 degrees vertically), a tower like "Shilka" (with armor similar to a tank one) and a remote control machine-gun mount on it. 4 channels of fire with the same crew.
    P.S. Of course, such a machine will not replace pedestrian shooters, and it should not. If you need to take a building, you can’t do without them. What is needed here are not recruits (in my opinion, not a necessary element in the modern army — monkeys with a grenade), but professional, specially equipped special forces or other detachments prepared to storm the fortified structures.
    And so - a good machine would be. If it were, even with all its shortcomings in Chechnya or Afghanistan, there would be significantly less losses. After all, the first shot for her is nothing, and she will not give a second shot.
  7. ksandr45
    0
    22 November 2012 14: 04
    True, it’s better to fight with her than without her
  8. 0
    17 January 2013 08: 24
    normal machine!
    two thirty will crush the NATO trenches, and the birds flip the Abrams!
    well done designers !!!
  9. -1
    17 January 2013 08: 40
    GO TO EUROPE !!!
  10. Alikovo
    0
    14 February 2013 12: 39
    new kind of technology
  11. aleks-s2011
    0
    18 March 2013 17: 29
    for me it’s such a very wonderful machine. especially since she has undeniable advantages. this is ammunition protection. and the most important crew is all sitting in the hull. more likely to survive.
  12. Nail
    0
    13 March 2015 11: 46
    was not destiny to defend against an air attack? hang a couple of "pipes" and in order