Shotgun High Standard Model 10 (HS-10)

20
The HS-10 Combat Shotgun (High Standard Model 10) was originally designed to be used by the police and special forces. This is an American semi-automatic rifle, the production of which was engaged in the company High Standard Manufacturing Company. In terms of its design, the 10 Model was based on the Flite King self-loading rifle, which was remade to fit the bullpup. To recharge this weapons used energy powder gases. Series production of the HS-10 shotgun began in the 1967 year.

The idea of ​​developing a combat shotgun (based on the existing smooth-bore gun) in the new layout of the bullpup belongs to the American engineer, police sergeant Alfred Crouch, who patented the “device for firing from a gun with one hand” in 1957-1961. This device was a bullpup box made of aluminum with a pistol grip and butt plate, which rotated around a longitudinal axis. Such a solution made it possible to fire a weapon not only from the shoulder, but also with just one hand, resting the butt pad, turned horizontally, into the biceps of the shooting arm. As a basis for his development, he chose the self-loading shotgun Remington 11-48 that he had as a police officer.

It is worth noting that the novelty was perceived by no means immediately. Crouch repeatedly appealed to various firms, and only in 1965 did he manage to sell his product to High Standard Manufacturing Company, which specialized in the production of self-loading pistols and smooth-bore guns. The engineers of this weapons company reworked the development of Alfred Crouch, replacing the aluminum one-piece box with a plastic one, which was assembled from 3's main parts. In addition, they added to the design such useful items for military weapons as a combat lantern, which was placed above the barrel in front of the grip, as well as a convenient integral grip for carrying.

Series HS-10A


Since the Flite King self-loading rifle was the “heart” for shotguns of the High Standard model 10 series, they inherited from it a barrel-mounted tubular magazine designed for the 4 cartridge, as well as a vapor system with a ring piston that was located around the magazine's pipe. Locking the barrel of the weapon was made by skewing the bolt. The ejection of the sleeve was made on the right side, and the loading of cartridges through a special window, which was located in the lower part of the receiver. The recoil spring was placed under the barrel, around the shotgun shop. Such a solution allowed without special difficulties to convert the existing basic solution into a shotgun made according to the bullpup scheme.

The body of the shotgun HS-10 was made of plastic, it consisted of 3's main parts - the back, top and bottom. These parts were connected to each other in the center by a metal part-lock of a horseshoe shape and were attached to the shotgun with a screw cap of the store in front, as well as with a screw that fixed the butt plate on the receiver in the back of the weapon. On the model of the shotgun HS-10A, the handle for carrying the weapon was integral, the aiming devices were built into it, and a tactical flashlight was located in the central part. Sights self-loading shotgun had an extremely short aiming line.

On the shotgun of the HS-10B model, the handle was made foldable, a rear sight was made on its movable base, and the front sight became foldable (folded back) and mounted on the barrel. Removable flashlight located in front of the pistol grip. The trigger was connected to the trigger mechanism by means of double wire thrust. The shotgun guard was located in front of the trigger guard and was made in the form of a transverse button. In the on state, it blocked the trigger rods. In all cases, without exception, this shotgun was performed only in the 12-caliber. The barrel chamber had a length of 70 mm (12 / 70), that is, the shooting of the HS-10 shotgun was not designed for the use of 12 / 76 “Magnum” cartridges.

Shotgun High Standard Model 10 (HS-10)
Series HS-10B without a tactical flashlight


The combat shotgun, which received the designation HS-10A, was launched into serial production in 1967, initially sold only to US police departments, as well as other government agencies. In 1970, the design of the shotgun model has undergone some changes, it has been slightly improved - the integral carrying handle was replaced with a shotgun with a folding side, the front sight from the handle moved to the trunk and began to fold, and the second handle appeared to be loaded on the left side. This model received the designation HS-10B (High Standard model 10B).

This model of a shotgun was sold not only to police officers, but also to ordinary citizens. Initially, these shotguns were quite popular among police officers, but only a few years later they began to get rid of them. The 10 model came out not particularly reliable, especially when using small or medium power cartridges. In addition, the capacity of the store on the 4 cartridge was not enough for the model, which was initially positioned as a military weapon. As a result, the production of this shotgun was completely stopped, and most of these smooth-bore guns passed into civilian hands. Many US residents acquired HS-10 shotguns on sales of written-off police property, of course, they were bought cheaply.

Perhaps nowadays, when the bullpup weapons scheme has already ceased to be in doubt, this semi-automatic weapon could gain a second youth by carrying out appropriate modifications. Initially, Crouch's idea of ​​unifying long-barreled weapons for aiming fire with both emphasis in the shoulder and straight from the belt with emphasis in the biceps, looked original and quite attractive. Currently, most of the released self-loading shotguns of the HS-10 series are in private collections for firearms lovers.

Information sources:
http://world.guns.ru/shotgun/usa/high-standard-10a-10b-r.html
http://ohrana.ru/weapon/semiautomatic/10962
http://www.shooter.com.ua/page/88
http://eragun.org/usa/magvint/vinma_20.html
20 comments
Information
Dear reader, to leave comments on the publication, you must sign in.
  1. +1
    14 November 2014 09: 10
    Thank you for the article.
    I don’t know how much such a barrel is justified. On the one hand, the bulpap gives a plus in size. On the other hand, imagine holding this barrel in your right hand to distort the shutter handle. Although maybe for the police this is not so significant.
    In general, this is a matter of taste.
    1. 0
      14 November 2014 09: 30
      Quote: bazilio
      I don’t know how much such a barrel is justified.

      And I wonder how long the barrel and all weapons turned out together. And the carrying handle on such weapons, IMHO, is superfluous.
      "The Model 10 did not come out very reliable, especially when using small to medium power cartridges."
      For a short trunk, this is not surprising.
      1. +2
        14 November 2014 13: 33
        The point is not the length of the barrel, but the fact that when using low-power cartridges, there is not enough exhaust gas energy to recharge. Deficiencies in the mechanism.
  2. +6
    14 November 2014 09: 40

    Yes, any weapon can be converted into a bullpup system of the same saiga 12
    1. +2
      14 November 2014 09: 47

      Continuation of the topic
    2. +1
      14 November 2014 10: 41
      And the Belarus tractor can be converted into a Formula One car, why do you think these counts from Saigi can be counted on the fingers, and often people shoot a couple of times and take a picture with these brutal aggregates remakes them back?
  3. +1
    14 November 2014 11: 12
    ugly then what.
    I remember him for all sorts of undeclarers.
    horror.
    weapons must be beautiful.
    1. 0
      14 November 2014 16: 49
      Quote: Bigfoot_Sev
      I remember him for all sorts of undeclarers.

      Shotgun High Standard Model 10B was used in 8 films, among them:

      "An Eye for an Eye" featuring Chuck Norris



      "The Protector" featuring Jackie Chan



      in the Miami Police series (Miami Vice)

      as well as in 2 games:
      Call of Duty: Black Ops
      Ghost Recon: Phantoms
  4. padonok.71
    0
    14 November 2014 13: 02
    Oh, what a passion! How can I imagine that in front of / on the side of the face, the shutter slams like that - OOO! Even if from 12/70. And 4 + 1 is not enough like that.
    Quote: gross kaput
    Why do you think these alterations from Saigi can be counted on the fingers, and often people shoot a couple of times and take a picture with these brutal units remodels them back?
    No, did not think why?
    1. 0
      14 November 2014 14: 11
      Quote: padonok.71
      Oh, what a passion! How can I imagine that in front of / on the side of the face, the shutter slams like that - OOO! Even if from 12/70. And 4 + 1 is not enough like that.
      Quote: gross kaput
      Why do you think these alterations from Saigi can be counted on the fingers, and often people shoot a couple of times and take a picture with these brutal units remodels them back?
      No, did not think why?


      Ergonomics snappiness suffers very much.
      1. 0
        14 November 2014 15: 11
        Quote: Mayor_Vikhr
        Ergonomics snappiness suffers very much.

        This is just not the main thing, the change of the store and the translator fuse are also not so critical, the main thing is the chatter under the cheek of the massive shutter frame separated from the muzzle of the face by a thin cover, in this case, with kabum with the jaw, you can immediately say goodbye, plus nervousness adds fun the swinging shutter handle also adds to the high gas content, since the place of application in this case is just at the point above the extraction window and even saiga-12 has automatic gear with a short stroke but a stink of 12 gauges is still enough.
        1. 0
          14 November 2014 15: 57
          With all due respect to your opinion, I do not see any problems in the mechanics. You can do as you like: and transfer the fuse, and the loading window, the extraction of spent cartridges to do down, as, for example, Ithaca mode 37 or Browning bps, the design features of which can be used in shotguns with automatic venting.



          Safety will be ensured at the proper level, gas pollution will cease to be distracting (if it takes place at all with a self-loading shotgun) and even some ergonomic problems will be solved, but not the main ones. The gun will remain mediocre in its basic qualities for the shooter and will be inferior to the guns of the classic layout - and this is the main thing for the gun.
          No one needs a new design rifle if it is less convenient to shoot from it than from a conventional one: it takes more time to aim and shoot and additional energy is spent on the shooter, preparation for shooting takes longer.

          Here is a link where there is a little about the applicability, balance and posadosti guns:

          http://www.sportguns.ru/19/book-hunt-sport-1/balance-shotguns.html

          There is no time to look for more serious materials on this topic. There are a lot of things in English. When designing stocks and stocks, much is taken into account.
          1. 0
            14 November 2014 17: 18
            Quote: Mayor_Vikhr
            With all due respect to your opinion, I do not see any problems in the mechanics. You can do as you like: and transfer the fuse, and the loading window, the extraction of spent cartridges to do down, as, for example, Ithaca mode 37 or Browning bps, the design features of which can be used in shotguns with automatic venting.

            Uh-huh, "if you really want to, you can fly into space" (quote, I don't remember the author, some regular "arrow squirrels" from extrada)
            It's not about the new design (and in the case of your alterations, the design will be essentially new, for most of the details it is not interchangeable with the source) but about the banal stupid modification at home of the buns from Saigi, or in the case of High Standard Model 10, from standard remington.
            1. 0
              14 November 2014 17: 46
              If there was a prospect for the development of such a class of weapons, then the designers would have done. There is nothing impossible in this. Carrying a fuse button is not a problem. Shotguns with rifle magazine equipment in front were produced. The solid and closed receiver is safe. Nothing fantastic. To open the shutter with the help of a gas-distributing device and return it back by the force of a return spring instead of the hand of an arrow - this is in many models when, with minimal changes in the design, gas and pump shotguns are produced by one firm in parallel.

              Just, as they say, the game is not worth the candle. They tried it - garbage came out.
              1. 0
                14 November 2014 20: 17
                Quote: Mayor_Vikhr
                If there was a prospect for the development of such a class of weapons, then the designers would have done.

                Oh how, well so so to speak, to broaden one's horizons -
                original 12-caliber bread rolls Heckler-Koch CAWS, Jackhammer.
                The original 12 gauge pump rolls are Kel-Tec KSG, Neostead, UTAS UTS-15.
                Well, for an appetizer, Chinese rifles produced in two parts at once P / A Hawkanti-riot gun standard / Hawkanti-riot gun bullpup and pump Hawk pump / Hawk bullpuppump, and in the standard version this pump is armed with the PRC army / police under the name type- 97.
                So what they did and are doing, but the conversation is not about those guns that were originally designed for the line up of bulpups, but about the "knee" alterations of standard semiconductor guns into rolls and all the problems arising from this - specifically about the conversion of Saiga 12 into a roll, to expand horizons on the Hanse, there are more than one topic where people are discussing such knee alterations and what came of it in the end - read, quite interesting.
                1. 0
                  14 November 2014 20: 34
                  They do, but the market for such weapons is insignificant. For the needs of the police, there are shotguns with a retractable stock, and shortened, and so-called shotguns for 2-3 rounds of 12 gauge. Bulpups in the vast majority of use cases lose to the guns of the classic layout scheme.

                  They are too compromise in ergonomics. Do not underestimate the ergonomics of combat weapons. The ability to be the first to make a quick and accurate shot at the target costs the life of the less successful shooter. Therefore, many "experimental" concepts will never get widespread, since they are inferior to the classics in these parameters.
                2. 0
                  15 November 2014 01: 07
                  Quote: gross kaput
                  Quote: Mayor_Vikhr
                  If there was a prospect for the development of such a class of weapons, then the designers would have done.

                  Oh how, well so so to speak, to broaden one's horizons -
                  original 12-caliber bread rolls Heckler-Koch CAWS, Jackhammer.
                  The original 12 gauge pump rolls are Kel-Tec KSG, Neostead, UTAS UTS-15.


                  By the way, you yourself listed either purely experimental models that never got a ticket to life, or extremely unsuccessful and extremely narrow-key ones.

                  Now look at the leaders of popularity in the American market of self-loading shotguns. It is the largest in the range of models offered, and in the total number of weapons purchased. And what of this variety is preferred by the police, army and special forces.

                  Predictably there will prevail the guns of the classic layout scheme. Most likely, it will be self-loading Benelli, Franchi, Remington and even Browning. Gas venting, less often with a moving barrel. Such as, for example, Benelli M4:



                  When life is at stake, there are few who wish to acquire ineffective weapons. Especially among professionals.

                  About the "obulpapenuyu" self-made site, I did not mention in my posts to the topic. You confused me with someone else.
    2. +1
      14 November 2014 15: 04
      Quote: padonok.71
      No, did not think why?

      Are you mocking? bully
      1. padonok.71
        0
        14 November 2014 16: 20
        Manenko :) I wanted to read the "smart" ones. Self-education is equal in importance to self-entrenching :)
  5. +2
    14 November 2014 19: 24
    Thank you for the article. And thanks to everyone who left comments that I discovered something new for myself.