Interrupted flight of Orlan

17
Interrupted flight of OrlanThe idea of ​​creating surface ships with a nuclear power plant (AES) arose from the Soviet military-political leadership in the second half of the 1950-s. However, the first attempt traditionally came out lumpy: the development of the atomic ship of the air defense (project 81) and the atomic cruiser (project 63) was discontinued in 1957 and 1959, respectively.

The second time they tried to enter the same river in the middle of 1960, when the team of Leningrad TsKB No. 53 (then the Northern Design Bureau) was instructed to create an “inexpensive” oceanic atomic 8000-ton “watchdog”. Having an unlimited range of navigation, he had to ensure the combat stability of warship detachments, escort convoys, and perform search and escort with high efficiency and the destruction of the enemy SSBNs with the onset of hostilities. It was planned to build one such ship for each enemy SSBN, which in the end should have been 35 – 40 units.

However, it soon became clear: these plans are impossible. Mainly due to the high cost of the ship and the unpreparedness of the domestic shipbuilding industry to build such a series of nuclear ships of a sufficiently large displacement for those times. Nevertheless, work on the subject of a ship with nuclear power plants was continued as part of the creation of a large atomic anti-submarine ship (BOD) of the 1144 Orlan project.

Initially, it was planned to establish a promising universal missile system capable of hitting surface, submarine and even aerial targets; 57- and 76-mm artillery and rocket bombers, torpedo tubes and unmanned helicopter. Then added antisubmarine controlled complex weapons with missiles equipped with atomic depth bombs, or rocket-torpedoes.

However, neither a universal rocket complex, nor an unmanned helicopter were ever created. And the Orlan composition of the TTZ already included the Malakhit P-120 anti-ship missile system (SCRC), the Metel anti-submarine guided missile system (PLRK) with a solid-fuel remote-controlled 84P cruise missile (the warhead is self-guided anti-submarine torpedo-10). ), the C-2 “Fort” anti-aircraft missile system (analogue of the ground-based “three hundred”), 300-mm universal and 130-mm rapid-fire artillery systems, 30-mm torpedo tubes (TA) and jet bombs (RBU). Plus two helicopters.

Outline ship design finished in 1969 year, but 25 May 1971 year in stories the future of the Kirov-type missile cruisers should be a new turn. According to the new decree, the 1144 “Orlan” project was combined with the X-powered Exploration Project 1165 - the atomic missile cruiser, which had the main purpose of combating enemy aircraft-carrier and naval attack groups (the main armament of the ship

P-120, and then - 32 rocket P-700 "Granit"). At the same time, the atomic BOD, which was now assigned shock functions, now became the atomic anti-submarine cruiser, and later, in the 1977 year, it was transferred to a new class - the heavy atomic missile cruiser.

NUCLEAR LEVIAFAN

The development of the “united” project was left to the Northern PKB, the technical design was completed in 1972, and 26 in March of the following year, the lead ship of the series, the Kirov, was laid at the Baltic Shipyard in Leningrad. In the new role, the cruiser was intended to strike at the enemy's ship groupings (first of all, at carrier-based groups and formations); search, tracking and destruction of submarines, as well as the provision of zonal air defense of their forces.

The creation of such a large surface ship immediately caused a lot of problems, which is not surprising. The industry had to build not just big ships, but real “rocket battleships”, the standard displacement of which exceeded 24 KT, and the maximum length of the hull reached 251 m. For comparison, the maximum length of the Yamato battleship (the Japanese the giant was more than two times larger).

For the serial construction of 1144 cruisers at the Baltic Shipbuilding Plant, it was necessary to specially form a production line for the primary processing of sheet steel and a plasma line for cutting sheets of armored steel and thick stainless steel sheets for iron-water protection tanks, which required special surface cleanliness and edges. In total, only for the Kirov hull it was necessary to assemble and weld over 300 volumetric sections, a number of them - for 80 tons.

A nuclear power plant had to be created specifically for Orlan. The developers used a block layout scheme, which made it possible to reduce the dimensions of the NPP and improve its operational parameters, while the automatic cooling system was able to shut off the reactor even in the event of a ship tipping over.

An important feature of the main power plant of the Kirov cruisers was that along with the nuclear power plant there was also a backup power plant based on two steam boilers. Participants in those events claim that at a meeting on the development of the Project 1144 cruiser, the then Commander-in-Chief of the Navy, Sergei Gorshkov, asked the audience: “Can you imagine what will happen if both nuclear reactors“ fly ”in any South China Sea? What will be the blow to the prestige of the Soviet fleet? " The meeting resulted in the decision to install a backup non-nuclear power plant on the cruiser, capable of providing 17 knots with it.

A number of new and non-traditional design solutions were implemented in the project. For the first time in the practice of domestic shipbuilding, most of the weapon complexes were executed in closed versions - their elements were located in the under deck areas. First of all, it is the Granit SCRC and the S-300F SAM, which had respectively 20 underdeck unhooked container-type PU for supersonic 3М45 and 12 underdeck PU, eight ready-to-launch missiles in each "drum" with 96NN-39N common X-AM-99NNX-39N-9N-39N-9N-9N-9N-9N-99N-9N-9N-9N-9N-9N-9N-9N-99N-9N-9N-9N-9N-9N-9N-9N-9NY-9NY-9NY-9N-9N-15N-9N-9NY-9NY-9N-9N-99NY-9NY-9N-US-NN Yes, the "Snowstorm" complex with a single dual container-type PU was refined in a special design - the 5 PLUR ammunition set was placed in a horizontal turret-type installation and was removed under the forecastle deck.

In addition, the lead ship received an OSA Osa-MA (two double-beam overhanging deck-mounted launchers, 40 9М33 missiles), two single-barrel 100-mm AK-100 artillery guns (1200 shots), 8 six-barreled 30-mm AK-XNUMNM CHM-AKTM gunships, and 630 six-barreled 48-mm guns AK-XNMUM guns) shots), two five-pipe 533-mm TAs (placed on the second deck, shooting was carried out through side latch ports closed in the stowed position; ammunition - 10 torpedoes SET-65 or 53-65К), one 12-barrel 213-reactive reactive 6000-72K was one 305-barrel 1000-reactive reactive 48-XNUMXK. RBU-XNUMX (XNUMX jet depth charges) and two six-barrel XNUMX-mm RBU-XNUMX (XNUMX RSL), as well as three permanently-based helicopters, various EW facilities, etc.

NUCLEAR TRINITY

Subsequently, the Orlans were built according to the improved 11442 design, in the same hull and with practically the same ship mechanisms, but with a different composition of weapons. Its structure gradually included the newest Dagger air defense missile system with under-deck vertical launch launchers (four eight-rocket “drums”), the Kortik anti-aircraft missile and artillery complex (six combat modules), the AK-130-MR-184 complex with a double-barreled 130-mm artillery installation, as well as the Vodopad-NK PLRK with rocket-torpedoes, used along with the usual 533-mm TA torpedoes or rocket-torpedo launchers (the PLUR common torpedoes and torpedoes were brought to 30 pieces), as well as anti-torpedo and anti-anti-torpedo defense systems RKPTZ-1 "Udav-1" with two 10-st Free 300-mm PU (120 RSL).

The last cruiser, Peter the Great, also received one complex.

C-300FM "Fort-M", characterized by extended defeat zones in range, height and lower boundary, as well as increased ability to intercept high-speed targets, including ballistic missiles, and increased channelity on the target and on the rocket.

It is believed that the "Kirov" and its sister-thorns should have been used as a core for the formation of ship search and attack groups or else to create the backbone of the guard forces of aircraft carrier groups formed on the basis of atomic aircraft carriers of the "Ulyanovsk" type. These groups could also include the Ural-type nuclear-powered reconnaissance ship with the Coral system.

However, until the collapse of the Soviet Union, only three Orlans were built — the fourth entered the fleet combat only in 1998. Atomic BRSK "Ural" has long been rusting in the Far East - in September of this year. announced a tender for its disposal costing about 1,2 billion rubles. As for the Ulyanovsk nuclear aircraft carrier, in the 1992 year, “in the infancy”, Ukrainian shipbuilders killed the money for easy money (by the way, they did not receive the promised orders).

DELIGHT

During the period of completion of the last of the 1144 rocket cruisers, Peter the Great, at the Baltic Plant, the author of this material was a cadet at VVMU. Mv Frunze. At the time of the visits to the northern capital of the warships of foreign fleets from our school, liaison officers were appointed. One of these officers, who was in October 1994 on board the destroyer of the Glasgow patrol system, a veteran of the Falklands battle, who accompanied the royal yacht Britannia during her call to St. Petersburg (the yacht and the destroyer provided a state visit to Russia by Queen Elizabeth II) , told about the next remarkable episode.

During the passage of the destroyer by the plant of Peter the Great, which was stationed at the outfitting embankment, one of the British officers addressed a Russian colleague:

- You say that there are no battleships in the Russian fleet ...

- Yes. Now there is no, - not quite understanding the essence of the question, answered our officer.

- What is it then? - The Briton parried with some sarcasm, pointing to a giant ship sailing past.

- It? This is a missile cruiser.

- Cruiser ?! - It was the turn to be surprised by the officer of the fleet of Her Majesty. “Then how would you have a battleship?”

What did you actually want? Normal naval justice: someone has atomic aircraft carriers, and we have their killers. And also atomic.

THE FINAL

The creation of the 1144 cruisers was not only and not so much a response to the challenge of the United States, as was the case with other Soviet military programs, as an objective necessity. As it seemed then, the Russian Navy needed a ship that could indefinitely — within its autonomy, of course — search, detect, and track enemy SSBNs in all areas of the oceans, and also possess sufficient combat potential to destroy large detachments of warships and carrier groups of potential adversary.

And in the end, the Orlan from a highly specialized ship transformed into a multi-purpose ship, becoming essentially the first domestic ship capable of equally effectively solving the tasks of fighting submarines, surface ships and enemy air attack weapons. Five designers of the Northern PKB were awarded the State Prize for the 1144 project, and the first ship commander, many sailors who took part in his ordeals, and industry representatives did not pass by the awards.

On the other hand, nuclear-powered cruisers like the Kirov became the swan song of Soviet shipbuilding, the final chord of the “doctrine of the giants”. Seriously podzatyanuvsya program fell victim to the harshest and uncompromising judges - time and scientific and technological progress, which left no room in the world's military fleets for huge battleship-like "white elephants" (example from the ocean - the death of the project 500-rocket "ship-arsenal") . As a result, sadly aware, today the place for “Orlan” remains, perhaps, only in the museum.

And the words about the museum is not a “joke of humor”. In order to patriotic education of the younger generation and preserve the memory of an entire era — the era of the Soviet Ocean Nuclear Missile Fleet — it seems to us that we must preserve one of its iconic ships as the main ship-museum of Russia. As it was done, for example, in the United States with several large warships, including aircraft carriers, or in France, where the strategic Redoubt bomber launched the watch. There are only two candidates left for such a megamuseum today - either the 1144 cruiser or the 941 submarine.
17 comments
Information
Dear reader, to leave comments on the publication, you must sign in.
  1. +4
    12 November 2014 08: 38
    Undoubtedly handsome, but the cost just rolls over.
    1. +6
      12 November 2014 10: 14
      In matters of national defense, cost is not the most important parameter. Perhaps the most beautiful ships since the 2MB.
    2. The comment was deleted.
  2. +2
    12 November 2014 09: 40
    On the other hand, atomic cruisers of the Kirov type became the swan song of Soviet shipbuilding, the final chord of the "doctrine of the giants."

    There is no normal infrastructure, there will be no ocean-going fleet. Berths, tugs, docks, etc. everything should be built in proportion. It is not enough to build a large ship. "Kiev" was standing on a barrel, burning fuel oil, now the hotel .... but that's another story.
    1. +8
      12 November 2014 13: 27
      Quote: Severomor
      There is no normal infrastructure, there will be no ocean fleet.

      C'mon, Peter as part of the Federation Council, Nakhimov will be in the modernization, he will be in the service for another 30-40 years, they also decided to modernize Lazarev, they will cut only the first one, Kirov, Atlantov will also be modernized, and there is no final decision on the Sharks. Nakhimov has been waiting for modernization since 1999, he waited.
  3. +3
    12 November 2014 10: 42
    Work, life, dreams and goals of so many people ... A whole era! As you think - already goosebumps running on the back. How much did our grandfathers do anyway ... And we? Beautiful ships, undefinitely beautiful, made with love!
  4. The comment was deleted.
  5. Alexander
    +1
    12 November 2014 14: 40
    Quote: ImperialKolorad
    Undoubtedly handsome, but the cost just rolls over.


    Do not want to feed your army, you will feed someone else's!
  6. 0
    12 November 2014 15: 09
    Quote: saturn.mmm
    Come on, .......... Nakhimov has been waiting for modernization since 1999, he has waited.

    Well, they themselves answered
  7. TECHNOLOGY
    -1
    12 November 2014 15: 42
    On October 31, 1984, the second ship of the series — the Frunze TARK (since 1992 - Admiral Lazarev) —was operational. None of the videos. See the Kryndets cruiser ......
  8. +1
    12 November 2014 16: 02
    One missile cruiser - either in the Baltic, or in the Atlantic, or in the Mediterranean Sea and the whole of Geyropa under the gun / control. Is it bad?
    1. Name-SBB-409
      0
      5 December 2014 00: 49
      Yeah, keep the TARK in the closed sea, or in the Atlantic - the height of the genius of couch strategists.
      I would have thought before writing nonsense.
  9. +2
    12 November 2014 16: 07
    Oh, if it were not for the collapse of the USSR, I can imagine what a fleet we would have!
  10. +1
    12 November 2014 16: 15
    It’s worth it, of course, yes, but doesn’t it happen that in case of which he could multiply any enemy aircraft carrier group by zero? How much will the total cost of the ships be there? The clog itself, subject to the use of special warheads ... And by covering the submarine with the gift and giving them time to launch the missiles, he completely fulfilled the task assigned to him .. Eh, early restructuring began, it was not enough for 5-10 years ...
  11. +1
    12 November 2014 16: 25
    On the other hand, atomic cruisers of the Kirov type became the swan song of Soviet shipbuilding, the final chord of the "doctrine of the giants."
    I do not agree with this conclusion of the author, it is not necessary to consider the Eagles as not that isolated, you need to consider them as a puzzle in the general picture of the military doctrine of the USSR. AND
    then Navy Commander Sergei Gorshkov
    (Heavenly kingdom) was a great strategist, in response to the American ground-based bases of the USSR, he created an ocean fleet, and thanks to the fleet parity between the USA and the USSR was achieved. hi
  12. +1
    12 November 2014 18: 43
    Something confuses me with the recent increase in the number of publications about the "harmfulness" of large warships. Tell the Americans about this, otherwise they continue to build their aircraft carriers.
    In general, the situation is very "post-Tsushima" reminds. Then, too, many wanted to leave Russia only the coastal defense fleet. Only the only benefit from this is visible for the sea nations - England, USA, Japan, and certainly not for Russia.
    IMHO
    1. +1
      12 November 2014 19: 47
      Quote: Trapper7
      the recent increase in the number of publications about the "harmfulness" of large warships

      So let's go the right way.
  13. gregorich 77
    +1
    12 November 2014 20: 34
    I did practice in Petra in 1996, a great ship, but I like it more
  14. +2
    12 November 2014 23: 32
    It was worth writing and posting on the site one small piece of news about Orlan, as articles about him rained down.
    And in the comments of the battle, more serious than sea real battles)
    Who knew that they react so vividly to him))))
    We still have to write - I want more new articles and battles)))

    Ps: And BE ORLAN !!))
  15. Seregatim86
    0
    13 November 2014 23: 11
    The renovation project with the modernization of the Orlanov makes them very relevant in our age of high technologies, etc. And in this light, they will still show "Kuzkin's mother" there is nothing to turn them into a museum, for raising patriotism and cooling the fervor of enemies, combat "Orlans" are much more suitable.
  16. 0
    13 November 2014 23: 48
    God help.
    So that everything that they’ve conceived happens.
  17. 0
    15 November 2014 08: 36
    It’s a pity that not all Orlans will modernize.