US intends to strengthen its presence in the Baltics

27
4 and 5 September in Wales should pass the next NATO summit, during which the leaders of the organization and the participating countries will discuss a number of topical issues. On the eve of the summit, US President Barack Obama arrived on an official visit to the capital of Estonia. In Tallinn, he made several important statements reflecting the position of official Washington on the geopolitical situation in Eastern Europe and capable of exerting some influence on it. Of greatest interest are the words of the American president regarding the presence of the United States and NATO in the Baltic States.

US intends to strengthen its presence in the Baltics


B. Obama announced that the United States has plans to strengthen its presence in the Baltic states. He announced that, in accordance with current plans, the Pentagon will transfer additional units of the air force to the Baltic States. The best place to accommodate combat aircraft considered the base in Estonia. Thus, the cooperation of the USA and Estonia within the framework of the NATO organization gets further continuation.

The head of the United States also said that the North Atlantic Alliance will continue to fulfill its obligations to Eastern European members, including the Baltic countries. B. Obama called such commitments eternal and stressed that Estonia will never be alone.

The statements regarding the transfer of additional units of the Air Force to Estonia can be considered as a kind of confirmation of the words about the observance of obligations to NATO partners. Since Estonia does not have powerful armed forces, it will help protect its airspace, and at the same time protect the eastern borders of NATO.

There is reason to believe that the current statements of B. Obama are a bit overdue to the previous claims of the Baltic leaders. At the beginning of this year, high-ranking officials in Latvia, Lithuania and Estonia repeatedly expressed fears related to a possible Russian attack. In addition, they doubted that other NATO countries would indeed honor their commitments and would assist the Baltic States in their fight against the aggressor.

The leaders of NATO and the organization’s member countries had to reassure their partners. In the spring and summer, NATO Secretary General Anders Fogh Rasmussen and Commander-in-Chief of the Allied Forces in Europe, General Philip Breedlove, arrived in Estonia. In addition, in early June, American President B. Obama met with his Eastern European counterparts. The result of the negotiations was a promise to allocate about 1 billion dollars to strengthen the defense of Eastern Europe. In addition, under pressure from Poland and the Baltic countries, it was decided to create a response plan in the event of Russian aggression.

It should be recalled that in recent years, the leaders of the Baltic countries have repeatedly offered to open NATO military bases on their territory. For example, in April of this year, the Estonian Foreign Ministry claimed that the alliance aircraft could be based at Ämari airfield, built in Soviet times for the USSR Air Force. Similar proposals were also expressed by the politicians of Latvia and Lithuania.

Nevertheless, despite all the entreaties, official Washington has not yet agreed to open new bases. In accordance with current plans, new airplanes, pilots and support personnel will be sent to the Baltic States, but they will work at an Estonian airfield without organizing a separate base subordinate to NATO. Thus, NATO, namely the United States, shows the Baltic States that they are ready to participate in ensuring security in the region, but at the same time they are not going to change their plans and build new military bases.

It should be recalled that NATO aircraft have for several years been involved in patrolling the airspace of the Baltic states. Since 2004, US fighter jets have been based on Baltic airfields and used as part of a joint program aimed at protecting the organization’s eastern borders. The number of aircraft involved in the patrol gradually increased from four to ten. In the near future, several more fighters will fly to the Estonian airfield.

Although the establishment of NATO bases in the Baltic States is not yet planned, several hundred fighters and specialists from the countries of the alliance currently reside in the states of the region. In June, joint NATO exercises Saber Strike 2014 took place at the test sites in Latvia, Lithuania and Estonia, after which not all participants went home. It has been reported that for a number of reasons, soldiers and officers around 600 will remain in the Baltic countries until autumn. It is noteworthy that the deadlines for their business trip have already come, and rumors have appeared in the foreign media that these 600 servicemen will go home, and they will be replaced by new units.

Such a rotation of troops is of particular interest. The fact is that it can be a convenient way out of the existing situation, when the US and NATO need to maintain good relations with several partners at once and not give them a reason to criticize. In recent years, the leadership of the North Atlantic Alliance has repeatedly reminded of the reasons for which it is not in a hurry to create bases in the Baltic States. The construction of bases in this region is hampered by certain conditions of agreements between Russia and NATO.

Thus, an attempt to build a military base in Latvia, Lithuania or Estonia will entail criticism from Russia. However, even with the recent deterioration in relations between the two countries, official Washington and the NATO leadership seem to be in no hurry to spoil them even more. Nevertheless, they need to maintain good relations with the Baltic States, for which the soldiers who remain after the exercises already serve there, and in the future several planes will be sent.

The reasons why NATO and the USA are gradually strengthening the grouping of troops in the Baltic states are approximately clear, as are the features of such strengthening. In connection with the latter the news from Estonia it is necessary to assess the risks for Russia that bear such a strengthening. First of all, Moscow should be concerned about the fact of an increase in the number of troops and equipment in the immediate vicinity of Russian borders. The Baltic countries themselves do not have developed and powerful armed forces capable of influencing the strategic balance in the region. However, foreign aid, and even more so the active participation of the United States, can not only increase the potential of troops stationed in Latvia, Lithuania or Estonia, but also have an impact on the balance of forces. Similar processes taking place near the borders of Russia pose a serious danger, at least for Russian-NATO relations, as well as for dialogue between Moscow and the Baltic capitals.

At the same time, the Baltic countries do not seem to intend to maintain good neighborly relations with Russia. Their leaders constantly declare their desire to participate in various NATO military projects, from joint exercises to the already mentioned allocation of territories for new bases. Not so long ago, according to unconfirmed reports, the Baltic politicians expressed a desire to participate in the program to build a Euro-Atlantic missile defense system, which could also worsen their relations with Russia.

The deterioration of relations with Russia against the background of the Ukrainian crisis allows Washington to implement various plans aimed at strengthening American positions in Europe, almost without regard to the Russian reaction. Nevertheless, while the US leadership prefers not to take risks and tries to do without direct violations of existing treaties with Russia. As a result, in the near future, new combat aircraft will fly to Estonia, and the Baltic "grouping" of troops, remaining after the exercises, will almost completely renew its personnel. However, one should not expect that official NATO bases will appear in the Baltics in the near future.


On the materials of the sites:
http://ria.ru/
http://lenta.ru/
http://interfax.ru/
http://svpressa.ru/
27 comments
Information
Dear reader, to leave comments on the publication, you must sign in.
  1. +7
    5 September 2014 09: 58
    It seems to me that "sprotniks" can greatly regret their impudence!
    1. nvv
      nvv
      +2
      5 September 2014 10: 31
      Quote: omsbon
      It seems to me that "sprotniks" can greatly regret their impudence!

      They will regret, but they will not give them. They remind me of a victim and the mouth of a boa constrictor, squeaks, but crawls.
      1. +1
        5 September 2014 12: 24
        Quote: nvv
        squeaks, but climbs.

        Rather different - "the mice cried, injected, but continued to eat the cactus." Pure masochism.
        1. Cadet787
          0
          6 September 2014 22: 57
          06.09.2014 - 22: 38
          The blockade of Mariupol - a direct threat to the destruction of the Kiev regime

          ROGERS Alexander
          The blockade of Mariupol - a direct threat to the destruction of the Kiev regime | Russian spring
          Why did the Kiev regime suddenly, after months of utterly militaristic rhetoric, start talking about peace and offer a truce?

          There are two reasons. The first is the actual rout of the Ukrainian punitive group. The second is the blockade of Mariupol and the threat of his release by the army of New Russia. It was not without reason that Taruta recently announced that "Mariupol must be defended, otherwise Ukrainian forces will have to admit defeat in the war."
          Mariupol Trade Port - the largest on the Sea of ​​Azov, belongs to the class of non-freezing. A deep-water channel has been brought to the port, allowing the acceptance of dry cargo vessels with increased draft. In addition to the commercial port in Mariupol, there is also an inactive passenger port and the port of the Azovstal metallurgical plant, which serves for the delivery of ore and the export of large-sized steel products that are not accepted for transportation by rail.
          Mariupol port is the only one in Ukraine capable of handling coal. The remaining ports do not have the necessary equipment. And after the cessation of supplies from the Donbass, the Kiev regime had to purchase a million tons of coal in South Africa. And this coal needs to be unloaded somewhere.
          But a million tons will not solve the problem of Ukrainian energy, since the annual coal consumption in Ukraine exceeds 70 million tons. And even without industry, only for heating and electricity Ukraine needs 40-50 million tons. That is, all the winning messages of Yatsenyuk “we purchased, we will bring” - this is a bluff. If you don’t get enough, you won’t get enough, you won’t breathe before death.
          The second point why the Mariupol port is so important is the export of metal and metal structures. This is the business of the oligarchs, and it is precisely for its support that the six Lyashko oligarchs are spinning all the time in Mariupol. And that is why there were all the events with mass executions of civilians - the oligarchs are panicky afraid of losing Mariupol.
          But this is not the main thing. The main thing is that a huge amount of grain is currently concentrated in the city. Most of this grain has already been sold abroad, and if these supplies are thwarted, the junta will get in trouble with buyers and will be left without any money. And there will be no money - there will be neither new weapons, nor funding for “volunteer” battalions, nor mercenaries from PMCs.
          And for New Russia, this grain can serve as the basis for food safety. With it, you can feed the inhabitants of the regions affected by the punitive and prevent the danger of hunger.
          That is why for New Russia, as well as to determine the fate of the whole confrontation, it is important to gain control over Mariupol.
    2. +2
      5 September 2014 10: 52
      Quote: omsbon
      It seems to me that "sprotniks" can greatly regret their impudence!

      I mean, if the sprats have time to regret! laughing
    3. 0
      5 September 2014 17: 03
      Come on, come on. Be present. It seems that it is not far off when Russia presents - remove the bases to the borders of the Warsaw Pact, or we will not cancel our sanctions. laughing
    4. Cadet787
      0
      6 September 2014 22: 55
      This ghoul will not save you, because every Russian has an aspen stake prepared from birth!
  2. +7
    5 September 2014 10: 03
    Poroshenko, at the NATO summit in Wales:

    "Friends! What are we doing here ??? ”
    “We will force the pig!”
    “Will she agree?”
    “And who is asking you?”
  3. +7
    5 September 2014 10: 06
    Well, gentlemen, the Estlandians. In which case - no offense.
    Yes, (in secret) Iskanders are already in Kaliningrad
  4. +2
    5 September 2014 10: 25
    Alas, there are too few lawns in the pro-Baltics. And in other places "enlightened" Western gentlemen do not go to the wind.
  5. +2
    5 September 2014 10: 49
    ... how, more "to strengthen the presence"?! .. means, not only to cut off the flowers on the lawns, but also to trample down the bushes, cut down trees and break off the fences, the gateways not only of the ob.s.s.s.s. .b, but also n.a.s.r.a.t. on the steps of the building of the Diet of some kind? ..

    strong!...
    1. 0
      5 September 2014 23: 56
      Take advantage of all the homosexuals, justify all the monuments, but a lot of things ...
  6. +3
    5 September 2014 11: 32
    The best place to place combat aircraft was considered a base in Estonia.

    Well, yes, where else, if not within walking distance, to place something for the reconnaissance battalion of the Pskov assault ...
    I think Mulatto breeds sprats according to the most primitive scenario.
    Something flies on their base and it terribly symbolizes NATO unity, which will fly away at the very first skheher ...
  7. +5
    5 September 2014 11: 42
    That's how persistently the Balts are doing everything to enter the USSR !!!!
    1. 0
      5 September 2014 13: 59
      well noticed, only the most important thing is not to create such free conditions as in the past of the USSR.
  8. +1
    5 September 2014 12: 04
    I think that 4-5 thousand "super-duper" defenders of the Baltic states will scare Russia like a naked .opa hedgehog. But the Baltic states should be frightened that it will become the primary target in the event of a conflict, without any chance of survival.
  9. Janis S.U.
    +2
    5 September 2014 12: 07
    By the way, my house is literally a hundred meters from one of the largest NATO military bases in the Baltics. The Americans are like Kaskintodor conquerors in relation to the Indians. They laugh like horses, point fingers at local people ... In stores, they say, making fun of local products, they can take something and immediately throw it on the floor. In a word, they behave defiantly ... By the way, grub is bought only in the local "Hesburger". If there is an Amer in the line ahead, then wait a long time - this one will take kilograms of French fries - for himself and the entire horde of his unit. Apparently, what the cooks of the national armed forces are preparing is clearly not to their taste or are afraid of poisoning.
  10. 0
    5 September 2014 12: 30
    It's time to end the pin-dosia, we have lost measure and a sense of rhythm, shamelessly lie, climb everywhere. It is necessary to bring them down like twin towers inside themselves, so that the world would be soiled minimally. Actually, there are no words already!
    1. +1
      6 September 2014 15: 59
      if you give up the dollar, then in the end it will be ...
  11. Crimea-nyash
    +3
    5 September 2014 12: 43
    it seems that in Europe there was insanity .. so only psycho-patients can voluntarily prepare for suicide ..
    1. 0
      6 September 2014 08: 18
      So it is, universal schizophrenia, the roof went in unison and everyone screams about the Russian threat. Well, they can’t live in peace, and if they don’t bother, then they themselves will take care of it.
  12. +1
    5 September 2014 13: 24
    Well, the so-called politicians are barking, and simple hard workers and peasants are reaping the fruits of such a foreign policy. And here so- that the Americans say, then these mongrel and repeat
  13. 0
    5 September 2014 14: 07
    It would be faster if the export and import of Russia switched to rubles, yuan ... Tugriks but not dolar.
  14. +1
    5 September 2014 14: 39
    Are not all flower beds pissed in the Baltic states?
  15. +1
    5 September 2014 14: 53
    Go ahead: pile up sprats with milk, you will find out why normal men need an ass!
  16. wanderer_032
    +1
    5 September 2014 15: 41
    All this is not surprising. This is to be expected.
    The buffer cordon is turned into the first strategic echelon.
    This has long been planned.
    Moreover, all the Balts will go to cannon fodder "for America!"
    Russophobia there is pumped in full. They are also set against Russians as Ukrainians.
    Systematically and prudently.
    1. Janis S.U.
      +1
      5 September 2014 18: 21
      For a long time, everything has already been decided on us, and such as in Ukraine, they say, Russian-speaking or just Russians are fighting against Russians - it is extremely unlikely. Many have been vaccinated since childhood from nationalism, Russophobia and intolerance on linguistic, national or social grounds. That is why many were initially not given citizenship and continue to spread rot or ignore, and especially Russian-speaking pensioners ... Of course, there is another part of the population whose ancestors with pleasure even before the Nazi forces of Germany killed Jews, fought for Hitler and arranged total extermination sat in Russia and Belarus. After all, the fact that up to 45 thousand people were repressed by the Soviet government in total, a significant part of them returned home when, during the German occupation, up to 450-500 thousand people were literally put to death in Latvia active participation of the Latvian legions. There is a huge part of ordinary opportunists ... But I emphasize the main thing - the Russian-speaking part of the population, which makes up approximately half of society, is certainly on the side of Russia and its President. There can be no doubt.
      1. wanderer_032
        0
        5 September 2014 20: 55
        Quote: Janis SU
        But I emphasize the main thing - the Russian-speaking part of the population, which makes up approximately half of society, is certainly on the side of Russia and its President. There can be no doubt.


        And what can this approximately half of the Russian-speaking part of the population oppose to pressure and pressure from a handful of the nationalist part of society, in which case?
        If now this same half cannot seriously oppose the legal lawlessness of this very handful that is happening in Lithuania, Latvia and Estonia.
        And it has been going on for over 20 years.
        When it comes to fried, we will see the same thing, heaps of refugees on the roads from the Baltic to Russia, as it was not in Ukraine. That's all.
        Because as you say, A must be able to defend B.
        1. Janis S.U.
          0
          5 September 2014 22: 51
          You did not understand correctly - not half of the Russian-speaking part of society, but half of the entire population, which is Russian-speaking. We have a two-community society - Latvian-speaking (overwhelmingly Latvians and the scanty part assimilated in Latvians or under Latvians) and Russian-speaking (from Russians, Ukrainians, Belarusians, Poles, Jews, Tatars, Moldovans .., to the actual Russian-speaking ethnic Latvians, who are also many ) What and who can counteract when from the very beginning many were not given citizenship and laws and other similar acts were adopted to secure the first-rate ranking of the first and the corresponding second-rate second? By the way, as they say, we didn’t leave our homeland, but she shrank and left. And the first Russian president, a rogue and a gallowsman Borka Yeltsin, made a considerable contribution to this heinous affair ... It is very important for understanding the real state of affairs - to know the opinion on the fundamental moments of a significant part of our population. I think that in a situation similar to the Ukrainian one, we have Latgale, which has always gravitated towards Russia and in whose composition the vast majority of residents are Russian-speaking. Refugees have always been everywhere, are and will be, since it is one thing for men to fight, and another to expose their old men, wives and children to bullets. Well, and the last ... Have you forgotten the events in Estonia, when literally all Russian-speaking youth came to the defense of the Bronze Soldier? We have a very, very strong veneration of Soviet soldiers-liberators, as well as other similar traditions. Now imagine the same situation in Riga. In the Latvian capital, most of them are Russian-speaking, and much more principled in relation to your Soviet or Russian past and, I think, the future. Not so simple. Here is my tale unhurried.
          1. 0
            6 September 2014 08: 13
            Janis you live in your home and have a clear idea of ​​the living environment, but I want to honestly ask. And how the whole Baltic region feels in general, has it really become freer and has become more fun to live. As far as I know, the European Union dictates all the conditions of how much and what to produce. It seems that the Balts had more opportunities within the USSR. And now the population is shrinking, and young people are running over the "hillock" in the hope of the best. If I am wrong then correct me.
            1. Janis S.U.
              0
              6 September 2014 10: 27
              The most important feature of time is that there is no confidence in the future. A huge number of young and middle-aged people are plowing in Irish beds, pouring pesticides on the seedlings there or something like that. Secondary moments are two completely different and sometimes overlapping universes of the Russian world and Latvian identity, hence the constant internal tension and latent hostility. As well as the dominance of the municipal officials of the titular nationality (and of course, it was for this reason that the Atmoda (revolution) of 1991 was, but simply the deposition of the republic from the Union), which is growing and growing, biting into the European funds with all its fibers and gills. These parasites have already become a scourge for the economy, but as our main profession, they are indestructible. Well, the tendency of humiliation of our country by the old EU countries and the States. This is very clearly expressed in the form of constant defecation at our shrines in the center of Riga and absolute disregard for our rules, traditions and laws on the part of their tourists or the military. Briefly, but very accurate.
          2. +2
            6 September 2014 09: 37
            Quote: Janis SU
            We have a very, very strong veneration of Soviet soldiers-liberators, as well as other similar traditions.


            This, if you will, is an illustration of your words. May 9 in Riga. A carpet of flowers at the Victory Monument.
            I go there almost every year ...
  17. 0
    5 September 2014 18: 40
    Why should Russia not deploy its aviation and missiles in Cuba, for example by accepting it in the CSTO? After all, the Americans violated the promise of non-expansion of NATO to the east.
    1. 0
      6 September 2014 07: 52
      Makh, wait a while when they get us it will be so.
  18. 0
    5 September 2014 21: 52
    Well, let them. Chukhonets die for the Americans.
  19. Postovoi
    0
    6 September 2014 00: 13
    Urgently strengthen the Kaliningrad region, and it is better to deploy the army again ...
  20. 0
    6 September 2014 07: 49
    And why do they tell us all this Baltic region. We have Kaliningrad, a small spool that is expensive, we can accommodate any kind of education there, up to "poplars". And let these Gay Europeans ache if they cannot live in peace without the Russian threat. In general, these psheks and spratniks resemble that hungry lonely woman whom they have not had for a long time. And now she looks at the passers-by men and dreams that well, at least some realties will wear her out. And with the concern of the Baltic states at the expense of the Russian threat, it's like with that prostitute. Renting myself, inexpensive, bargaining is possible.
  21. 0
    6 September 2014 12: 00
    05.09/24. Pushkov gave an interview to Vesti XNUMX. Liked about the Baltic states. When asked about the behavior of the Balts in relation to Russia, he replied that it seems that they have not yet been fought in different SS divisions and battalions.
    And in their own words, the meaning is that in World War II their ancestors got their teeth, and the current ones have not yet felt the Russian fist.
  22. 0
    6 September 2014 18: 36
    US intends to strengthen its presence in the Baltics
    - That's good. It is better to cover the chicken coop in one gulp, and not to rush after every "cock" in stinking Europe.