Military Review

Russia's military doctrine will be refined

42
The recent events in the international arena have led to a serious change in the military-political situation in the world. There are new threats, and the old have undergone some changes. To ensure the security of the country, the existing Military Doctrine will be finalized in the near future. A special working group has been formed under the Russian Security Council, which will have to prepare proposals for amendments to the existing doctrine. Complete the change of the main defense document is expected by the end of this year.

The planned introduction of adjustments to the Military Doctrine became known from the interview of the Deputy Secretary of the Security Council Mikhail Popov for the RIA news agency Newspublished September 2. M. Popov noted that the existing Military Doctrine provides for its change in the light of new threats to the state’s security, and now there are serious reasons for such changes to appear. The tendency of the development of the military-political situation in recent years, as well as the peculiarities of modern armed conflicts, require the elaboration of the existing Military doctrine.

The details of the changes that will be made to the doctrine, while for obvious reasons, remain unknown. The finalization of the document will be completed by the end of the year, but at present, experts have only just begun to analyze the military-political situation in the world and the prospects for its development. Nevertheless, it can be assumed that the updated Military Doctrine will take into account the threats associated with the latest events in the Middle East, Eastern Europe and other regions of great interest to Russia.

The current Military Doctrine of the Russian Federation was approved by presidential decree in February 2010. This document identified the main means and methods of ensuring the security of the country, as well as a list of possible threats. For example, unfriendly NATO actions, attempts to destabilize the situation in individual countries and regions, deploying or building up armed groups in the vicinity of Russian borders, building and deploying missile defense systems, territorial claims, violation of international agreements, international terrorism were classified as major external dangers and threats. etc.

The current Military Doctrine also defines the main tasks of the state’s military policy. Its objectives are to prevent an arms race, deter possible adversaries, prevent armed conflicts, as well as improve the structure of the armed forces, their equipment and strategy. In general, the main task defined in the Military Doctrine is to ensure the security of Russia and its allies. For example, the document provides for active cooperation with other states within the framework of the CSTO, CIS and SCO organizations.

In addition, the Military Doctrine has sections defining the role, goals, and methods of work of the armed forces; a policy of deterring likely adversaries; the development of the armed forces in terms of organization, strategy and equipment; military planning; various aspects of military-economic security of the state; features of cooperation with other states or organizations, etc.

Thus, the current Military Doctrine of the Russian Federation describes all the plans and intentions of the state aimed at ensuring its security. At the same time, the document has a separate paragraph, which speaks of the possibility of its refinement in connection with the emergence of new threats or changes to existing ones. As follows from recent reports, the country's leadership decided to take advantage of this opportunity and make adjustments to the doctrine in force with the 2010 of the year.

It can be assumed that the working group under the Security Council will develop a list of amendments to the Military Doctrine, taking into account the events that occurred after its adoption. Thus, the updated document will take into account all the events of recent years that have troubled official Moscow and influenced the military-political situation in a particular region.

The reason for innovations in the Military Doctrine may be the events of the so-called. the Arab Spring in the Middle East and North Africa; recent conflicts in Syria, Iraq, and the Gaza Strip; and other armed conflicts. In addition, the document will need to take into account certain actions of foreign countries, such as the deployment of missile defense systems in Eastern Europe, the complication of the situation in the Pacific region, as well as recent events around Ukraine and the Crimea. All these events and plans of other states can negatively affect the international situation, and also can threaten the security of Russia.

The military-political situation in the world is constantly changing, showing new risks and threats. Since the approval of the current Military Doctrine, the situation in the world has changed significantly and now the main defense document does not fully meet the requirements of the time. To eliminate such shortcomings, the doctrine will soon be finalized. Its updated version will be ready for the start of 2015.


On the materials of the sites:
http://ria.ru/
http://interfax.ru/
http://rg.ru/
http://kremlin.ru/
Author:
42 comments
Ad

Subscribe to our Telegram channel, regularly additional information about the special operation in Ukraine, a large amount of information, videos, something that does not fall on the site: https://t.me/topwar_official

Information
Dear reader, to leave comments on the publication, you must sign in.
  1. Russian jacket
    Russian jacket 3 September 2014 09: 25
    +16
    It is high time. And it is necessary to make a mention of a preventive nuclear strike so that some temptations do not arise about a disarming strike ... Otherwise, some rams are confused hi
    1. Natalia
      Natalia 3 September 2014 09: 40
      +14
      In the current doctrine, by the way, it is indicated that Russia reserves the right to use nuclear weapons in response to the use of nuclear and other weapons of mass destruction against her or her allies, as well as in response to large-scale aggression using conventional weapons, when threatened posed the very existence of Russian statehood. But this is not enough.

      The alliance, surpassing us by 4,5 times both in manpower and in military equipment, we must provide for how NATO containment can be ensured, disparity can be eliminated and the threat of war in Europe can be averted. Including, with the help of the presence of tactical nuclear weapons.

      And of course, return to the arming of medium-range missiles.
      1. ZU-23
        ZU-23 3 September 2014 10: 05
        +7
        The new doctrine has long been sitting in the right mind, it remains only to document. In theory, nothing has changed around us, the Americans did not go for a reboot.
        1. smel
          smel 3 September 2014 10: 23
          +7
          Quote: ZU-23
          Americans did not go to reboot.

          These nonhumans went to the escalation of tension around the world, to unleash a civil war near the borders of the Russian Federation, to increase military bases in Europe and to strike at the territories of sovereign states. And as for the reboot, they don’t even know such words. I remember talking about overload
          1. Cadet787
            Cadet787 3 September 2014 21: 29
            +1
            The runaway governor of Donetsk region requires decisive action
            03.09.2014 - 20: 31

            The escaped head of the Donetsk regional administration said that dialogue with the militias was only necessary on the exchange of prisoners and the creation of humanitarian corridors. As for the rest, according to Taruta, "the time has come for decisive action," Ridus reports with reference to the LifeNews TV channel.
            “I believe that it is necessary to introduce martial law. This will consolidate our society and free it from the unnecessary internal struggle and elections today,” the TV channel quotes the Donetsk governor.
        2. Lukich
          Lukich 3 September 2014 12: 02
          +5
          Quote: ZU-23
          In theory, nothing has changed around us, the Americans did not go for a reboot.

          they were not going to. it was Abamkovsky PR
        3. Vladimir Petrov
          Vladimir Petrov 3 September 2014 15: 17
          +3
          The Americans are fools. After the collapse of the USSR, the United States for the following years was doing everything possible to ruin Russia, turning it into a kind of helpless likeness of Ukraine. Fortunately, the helm of Russia had GDP. And the last sanctions imposed on Russia by the embarrassed Obama finally untied Putin and Russia with their hands so that all their forces could be sent to strengthen Russian power! Today, Obama is not only possible, but you also need to say thank you for the sanctions and other nastiness and dirty tricks that he has done in recent months against Russia! GOOD OBAMA !!! THANK YOU!!!
        4. Cadet787
          Cadet787 3 September 2014 21: 22
          0
          03.09.2014 - 20: 43
          Southeast Army Information Bureau update September 3: offensive is underway

          Southeast Army Information Bureau Summary for September 3: Offensive Goes | Russian spring
          During the day, the situation has not changed significantly.
          In the Donetsk direction, the enemy continues to regroup units withdrawn from the environment.
          In the Luhansk area, forces of the Army of the South-East subdivisions of punishers were driven out of Krasny Yar, Stukalovaya Balka, Shishkovo.
          The militia destroyed five trucks, three cross-country vehicles and up to thirty-five personnel.
          The units of the invaders, retreating from the settlements of Veselaya Gora and Happiness, abandon the faulty equipment and the seriously wounded.
          Militia artillery attacked a cluster of enemy military equipment in the area of ​​the village of Peredelskoye. An armored personnel carrier, two cars and up to twenty personnel were destroyed.
          In the Mariupol sector, the main efforts of the junta troops were focused on the fortification equipment of the occupied lines.
          Intelligence groups carry out search activities in order to identify artillery firing positions and areas of concentration of enemy reserves.
        5. Boa kaa
          Boa kaa 3 September 2014 21: 28
          +1
          Quote: ZU-23
          The new doctrine has long been sitting in the right mind,
          Who needs it? heads ... That's it. There are no former scientists, but the new ones devotedly looked into the mouths of the "reloaders". So it turned out that the doctrine did not answer the questions to which it was supposed to give a clear, unambiguous answer:
          - what will be the war for which it is necessary to prepare the COUNTRY (!) and its Armed Forces;
          - what kind of aircraft is needed for the structure and equipment of MBT to win the upcoming war;
          - who are our opponents and who are our allies in the upcoming war;
          - what needs to be done to prepare the COUNTRY (!) and its Armed Forces for the upcoming war.
          Each of these blocks has subparagraphs: material production, transport and communications, moral and psychological unity, hardening of military aircraft, science and R&D, production of MBT, accumulation of reserves and resources, mobil resources and their preparation, etc., etc.
          Further, based on the air force, the assessment of the theater of operations, the enemy forces, plans are made for the "construction" of the armed forces in a certain strategic direction. Now these questions will arise to their full extent before our state. and military leaders. Mobile forces are good, but their use is not always possible due to weather, transport, and other conditions ...
          Therefore, I consider it correct to develop modern weapons based on advanced science, saturate the armed forces with the latest MBT models.
      2. Moore
        Moore 3 September 2014 12: 09
        0
        In the current doctrine, by the way, it is indicated that Russia reserves the right to use nuclear weapons in response to the use of nuclear and other weapons of mass destruction against her or her allies, as well as in response to large-scale aggression using conventional weapons, when threatened posed the very existence of Russian statehood. But this is not enough.

        Plus, in the existing one - in response to the use of conventional weapons against the infrastructure of nuclear facilities.
      3. KBR109
        KBR109 3 September 2014 12: 16
        +1
        Tactical nuclear weapons can hardly be an element of deterrence. Strategists are for the States in the first place (as the leader of Evil), medium range for Geyropa. Tactical nuclear weapons are an instrument of an ongoing war and not a deterrent.
      4. Cadet787
        Cadet787 3 September 2014 21: 20
        0
        03.09.2014 - 20: 56
        DNR Minister of State Security Leonid Baranov commented on Vladimir Putin’s peace plan

        DNR Minister of State Security Leonid Baranov commented on Vladimir Putin’s peace plan | Russian spring
        Minister of State Security of the DPR Leonid Baranov said that he generally agrees with the peace plan of the President of Russia. Discussing each of his points, Baranov suggested making some corrections to it.
        First of all, this concerns the proposal to withdraw “the armed units of the Ukrainian security forces to a distance that excludes the possibility of shelling settlements with artillery and all types of multiple launch rocket systems”. “Installations“ Tornado ”,“ Hurricane ”operate at a distance of 35 (km) and even a little more. It’s necessary to understand that all the settlements are located close to us, therefore artillery should be removed from the territory of the whole republic, because, wherever the artillery is located, it will reach the settlements in any case, ”Baranov noted. In this regard, he called for the withdrawal of Ukrainian troops from the entire territory of the Donetsk Republic.
        The dense location of towns and cities in the DPR and LPR, Baranov also explained the need to introduce a ban on flights over the entire territory of New Russia. “In a good way, it is necessary to prohibit the use of aviation in the LPR and DPR, because the settlements are located very close almost always. Intelligence is not really being conducted, that is, hiding behind the words “we attacked the military,” they will again strike at civilians. They don’t have any accuracy, ”the Minister of State Security said.
        Baranov announced his agreement to exchange forcibly held persons under the “all for all” formula without any preconditions, as well as provide humanitarian corridors.
        The first paragraph of Putin’s plan to end “active offensive operations of the armed forces, armed militias of the south-east of Ukraine in the Donetsk and Lugansk directions”, the Minister of State Security of the DPR left without comment.
    2. Michael-rl
      Michael-rl 3 September 2014 11: 45
      -1
      Sorry to copy posts and get into conversation =)

      But tell me please, what kind of tank is this at the militia?
      The DZ tower is very similar to the T-72Б3 or t-72BA
      Thank you
    3. Russian1974
      Russian1974 3 September 2014 15: 36
      0
      It is necessary to work ahead of schedule they current and we already soldier
    4. LvKiller
      LvKiller 3 September 2014 21: 07
      0
      They confused the rams for other reasons - they consider themselves immortal as a result of a complete separation from reality. They hover in the clouds somewhere far away, but they shoot their asses in this reality.
  2. Afinogen
    Afinogen 3 September 2014 09: 26
    +1
    Nuclear forces need more reliance.
    1. GSH-18
      GSH-18 3 September 2014 09: 41
      +4
      Quote: Athenogen
      Nuclear forces need more reliance

      Everything is smooth there, they were always "leaned on". We need more SSBNs and strategic aircraft. Then the adversary will sit on the ass exactly. hi
      1. Goha
        Goha 3 September 2014 09: 52
        +2
        Previously, there were five schools of the Strategic Missile Forces, now only one is Serpukhov.
        1. RU-Officer
          RU-Officer 3 September 2014 10: 25
          +3
          I beg your pardon - your lie. Serpukhovskoe VVKIU RV named after Lenin Komsomol was such earlier, now - a military institute, and that's it. Many think that rocket officers ("strategists") are raised as "Urukhai orcs" in the mud. But the "personnel hunger" in the Strategic Missile Forces (and it already exists!) Cannot be equated with that in other branches of the armed forces (I do not take into account other components of the nuclear triad of the RF Armed Forces). This is our whole trouble - "how to go hunting - so to feed the dogs."
      2. RU-Officer
        RU-Officer 3 September 2014 10: 27
        +1
        And also to restore BZHRK and "Sovtransavto truckers" angry
        1. MAX2014
          MAX2014 3 September 2014 17: 12
          +1
          I do not agree. I think instead of the BZHRK it is necessary to allocate funds for the Strategic Missile Forces and the SSBN.
  3. Stiletto
    Stiletto 3 September 2014 09: 35
    +4
    The step is logical and timely. The West will howl again, but they, however, will not get used to it.
    1. MAX2014
      MAX2014 3 September 2014 17: 15
      0
      The West has the strategic nuclear forces of the last century. Well, maybe the submarines can still do something too. Therefore, they are so hysterical.
      1. LvKiller
        LvKiller 3 September 2014 21: 10
        0
        Due to the failure of HEU-LEU, they are already massively gutting their warheads to provide nuclear power plants with fuel, because the latter is sorely lacking. I think that in 10 years they will have no nuclear weapons at all. But before that, Mama Obama will come out and loudly declare: "You see how peaceful we are! We are reducing our strategic nuclear weapons by 146% !!! And the Russians are evil, they do not want to reduce, moreover, they even increase the production of the latest nuclear weapons."
  4. rpek32
    rpek32 3 September 2014 09: 44
    +1
    Quote: Russian quilted jacket
    It is high time. And it is necessary to make a mention of a preventive nuclear strike so that some temptations do not arise about a disarming strike ... Otherwise, some rams are confused hi

    IMHO vigorous bonbs is not a weapon on which you need to make a decisive bet. I do not say that they need to be cut / put a bolt on this category of weapons. I think high-precision long-range missiles would be much more effective. but it is, the fabrications of a couch politician
    1. Unclean
      Unclean 3 September 2014 12: 21
      0
      Totally agree with you. Developed and tested, the vacuum bomb even got the name "Dad bomb", because it is more powerful than the American "mom bomb". With a smaller amount of explosive. Not contagious and specific.
    2. LvKiller
      LvKiller 3 September 2014 21: 14
      0
      Do you know the cost of precision weapons? Will you bomb Aboriginal houses for $ 200 apiece with rockets for $ 2 million? Somehow not in the market. The cost of a tactical charge is slightly less than the good that it evaporates.
  5. Gardamir
    Gardamir 3 September 2014 09: 45
    +4
    but at present, experts have only just begun an analysis of the military-political situation in the world and the prospects for its development

    Is this humor like that? Experts should constantly monitor all changes.
    1. LvKiller
      LvKiller 3 September 2014 21: 15
      0
      The last expert was fired by the sulphurs employed by the ad. They, you see, won the salary tender. Now they started to work.
  6. Bowless
    Bowless 3 September 2014 09: 50
    +2
    NATO countries must indicate that they will be dealt a preemptive strike ... For some reason they themselves cannot guess.
    1. LvKiller
      LvKiller 3 September 2014 21: 16
      0
      IDDQD. They are sure that they are immortal.
    2. Vadim12
      Vadim12 3 September 2014 21: 28
      +1
      Openly publish targets in Europe and indicate the amount of ammunition for each target. Punctually, so calm. Update regularly. Most likely, sobering and will contribute to the emergence of anti-war sentiment in society.
  7. ImPerts
    ImPerts 3 September 2014 10: 00
    +2
    Quote: rpek32
    high-precision long-range missiles would be much more effective.

    It is certainly true, but only if you exchange point strikes. If NATO, then Nata))) But if the bloc will attack, then there is not to sentiment. There is just SNF and TNW)))
    1. rpek32
      rpek32 3 September 2014 10: 28
      +1
      Quote: ImPerts
      It is certainly true, but only if you exchange point strikes. If NATO, then Nata))) But if the bloc will attack, then there is not to sentiment. There is just SNF and TNW)))

      I guess, yes. vigorous bonbs remained and remain a weapon of deterrence, not an attack.
      1. Boa kaa
        Boa kaa 3 September 2014 19: 28
        +1
        Quote: rpek32
        vigorous bonbs remained and remain a weapon of deterrence, not an attack.

        Firstly, your "boNby" - got it. Once is a typo, but twice ...
        Secondly, "nuclear bombs", as you put it, remain a means (in fact, ammunition) of deterrence until the threshold of fear of an imminent retaliatory strike and the consequences of the use of nuclear weapons is crossed. And they cease to appear when the delivery vehicles (carriers) are destroyed and they cease to threaten the enemy.
        And they become a means of attack (retaliatory, preemptive, retaliatory strike) after a decision has been made by the country's top military-political leadership to launch nuclear weapons against designated targets.
        The dialectic is simple - the goal determines the means of achieving it. If, on the contrary, it is like terrorists who got hold of nuclear weapons and tried on where to "use" it.
        You will be able to find a photo of the Nuclear bomb in I-net.
        The combat equipment of modern carriers looks different:
  8. Loner_53
    Loner_53 3 September 2014 10: 04
    +5
    It is imperative to put into service medium-range missiles! And it is very necessary to supply ISKANDERS to our Kaliningrad wink We live surrounded by mongrel NATO, listen to their yapping. am
    1. Boa kaa
      Boa kaa 3 September 2014 20: 42
      +1
      Quote: Loner_53
      And it is very necessary to deliver "ISKANDERS" to us in Kaliningrad

      Undoubtedly, it is not necessary to cancel the decision to deploy Euro_MISTER NATO.
      But I’m interested in something else: why was it necessary to export tanks? Indeed, in KORA there were 850 cars, while in the whole LenVO - only 450! Why disbanded divisions and regiments. Or do we see something new to replace them? With ships it’s clear ... And what prevented 1: 1 from changing other equipment? After all, a colleague correctly remarked:
      We live surrounded by mongrel NATO
      and in a short (fleeting) threatened period, MBT can not be delivered to our exclave, not to mention the development of military operations by personnel of new compounds.
      That's so simple, from the podlianka Taburetkin and his henchman Makarov, we are preparing for D-Day.
      And now what: there’s not enough money for everything, no time ...
      Armata for marriage, not in service, P-26 - the same story, T-50 - the same, Sarmat - the same, Boreas and Ash-trees - units. Cruisers, destroyers, frigates, aircraft carriers - not visible.
      Colleagues, does this remind you of anything? I see so clearly 22 June 41 year. (And far from the fact that it will be 2041!)
      1. LvKiller
        LvKiller 3 September 2014 21: 20
        +1
        Do you think that two 955A is not enough? One is enough to pinch the comrades behind the Puddle properly. But this is so, by the way. When the mess begins, they will fight not the expensive F-22s, but with what they have - F-16/18. We need more army reliable weapons, powerful air defense and numerous air forces. Not necessarily mega-modern.
  9. saag
    saag 3 September 2014 10: 17
    +1
    They will see what will be accepted in Wales
  10. DMB-75
    DMB-75 3 September 2014 10: 42
    +2
    ... I completely agree with the fellow countryman Loner_53 + to him, since the Kaliningrad region among the NATO members is a thorn, surrounded on all sides.
  11. erased
    erased 3 September 2014 11: 14
    +3
    Well, they will finalize and finalize. They will document the current situation. And here everything is simple - NATO, led by the United States + the "civilized world" + sixes and jackals, by the decision of the world master (Transnational Financial, Commercial and Industrial Groups), continues to implement the plan for the complete capture of Russia. The plan is old, but it has been successfully implemented over the past 60 years.
    Russia has only one option - to survive. Another option is to die. The third option - Martians will fly in and save someone. The third option is the coolest, but alas, there is only the first. Although I am for the Martians.
  12. mimo crock
    mimo crock 3 September 2014 12: 07
    0
    Quote: Natalia
    In the current doctrine, by the way, it is indicated that Russia reserves the right to use nuclear weapons in response to the use of nuclear and other weapons of mass destruction against her or her allies, as well as in response to large-scale aggression using conventional weapons, when threatened posed the very existence of Russian statehood. But this is not enough.

    The alliance, surpassing us by 4,5 times both in manpower and in military equipment, we must provide for how NATO containment can be ensured, disparity can be eliminated and the threat of war in Europe can be averted. Including, with the help of the presence of tactical nuclear weapons.

    And of course, return to the arming of medium-range missiles.

    Which lice?
  13. mimo crock
    mimo crock 3 September 2014 12: 15
    0
    Quote: erased
    And here everything is simple - NATO, led by the United States + the "civilized world" + sixes and jackals, by the decision of the world master (Transnational Financial, Commercial and Industrial Groups), continues to implement the plan for the complete capture of Russia.

    So what was not captured in the 90s? Maybe even such a non-nuclear option: mobilize several million, spend trillions on a military campaign, lose hundreds of thousands of people (the government could have already flown off from this), then spend a lot of money on the occupation troops, from such aggression, Russian fanatics-terrorists will appear anyway .... too expensive? Apparently yes, the Ozero cooperative is in power, gas-oil flows like a river, the West is doing well in this matter.
  14. aszzz888
    aszzz888 3 September 2014 12: 18
    0
    Definitely, the need to revise our military doctrine is the reality of our days. And there is no need to turn back to the mericatos, let them choke on their false propaganda.
  15. A1L9E4K9S
    A1L9E4K9S 3 September 2014 14: 26
    0
    Gunpowder must be kept dry all the time so that it would not be taken by surprise, Ukrainians, mattresses, and various Poles there.
  16. dchegrinec
    dchegrinec 3 September 2014 14: 37
    +1
    It has long been clear that, for example, the United States will not abhor any means in achieving its fraudulent goals. Therefore, our doctrine, by no means, can be soft. At least similar.
    1. Boa kaa
      Boa kaa 3 September 2014 20: 56
      +3
      Quote: dchegrinec
      The United States will not abhor any means in achieving its fraudulent goals.
      A lot has already been said about these goals. In order not to talk much, it is better to see once:
      1. LvKiller
        LvKiller 3 September 2014 21: 23
        0
        Only for the presence of such plans, you need to add to dear friends - the Americans, one more, in excess of the planned. People with the mentality of Gd are a little extra. This planet is only for people, excuse me for such a manifestation of racism.
  17. yarilo-ya
    yarilo-ya 3 September 2014 22: 23
    0
    It is high time to resolve this issue, at the same time to show the whole world that we are not calves tied to pegs.
  18. Punkt
    Punkt 3 September 2014 23: 04
    +1
    what a doctrine !!! - you cho !!! - you live in a surreal world? -Do not stop people from doing business, plunder money and do kickbacks !! A couple more of these doctrines and rearmament with the Olympics and the economy will collapse !!!! !! - right now, for the third time, people’s pension savings, yes? I’ve already lost my account -worm))) bu ha ha ha))) and Serdyukov looted and buried the army walking quietly around Moscow, mother, you know what right now is the government? unplanned Serdyukov !!! - who sold the property of the people and the army is the face of the state !!! - and on TV everything as Americans say, BLA ... BLA BLA))) WAIT FOR A LITTLE REMAINING))))
    1. DMB-88
      DMB-88 3 September 2014 23: 27
      0
      Quote: Punkt
      Punkt (1) Today, 23:04 PM New
      what a doctrine !!! - you cho !!! - you live in a surreal world? -Do not stop people from doing business, plunder money and do kickbacks !! A couple more of these doctrines and rearmament with the Olympics and the economy will collapse !!!!


      It’s hard to disagree!
    2. Victor-M
      Victor-M 3 September 2014 23: 28
      0
      Quote: Punkt
      what a doctrine !!! - you cho !!! - you live in a surreal world? -Do not stop people from doing business, plunder money and do kickbacks !! A couple more of these doctrines and rearmament with the Olympics and the economy will collapse !!!! !! - right now, for the third time, people’s pension savings, yes? I’ve already lost my account -worm))) bu ha ha ha))) and Serdyukov looted and buried the army walking quietly around Moscow, mother, you know what right now is the government? unplanned Serdyukov !!! - who sold the property of the people and the army is the face of the state !!! - and on TV everything as Americans say, BLA ... BLA BLA))) WAIT FOR A LITTLE REMAINING))))


      You with such "potential" of claims will not last long. Glue the wallpaper at home, green is desirable. Distract yourself a little.laughing
  19. The comment was deleted.
  20. Semenov
    Semenov 4 September 2014 08: 58
    0
    An excellent answer to NATO’s plans to deploy new bases. Maybe the Balts and the Poles will think about it, it is indecent the Americans have ass licked.
  21. S. TALIN
    S. TALIN 4 September 2014 09: 41
    0
    The following doctrine should include the provision that in the event of an attack on Russia, the aggressor country will not only be driven back within its geographical borders, but also completely destroyed ... The nature of the war will not only be defensive. but also offensive ... With automatic inclusion in the Russian Federation.
  22. lexx2038
    lexx2038 4 September 2014 17: 02
    0
    Under the Ural Mountains, for example, they’ll bury a super-duper mega bomb deeply and very deeply, and mess up the media that in the event of a threat to Russia's integrity and sovereignty, no one will be left. There will be no Russia, there will be no planet Earth. Gouge the Americans directly through the earth's core. Retribution from the other world. Current dollars will fly in space.
  23. Ivan Susanin
    Ivan Susanin 4 September 2014 23: 36
    0
    Quote: lexx2038
    Under the Ural Mountains, for example, they’ll bury a super-duper mega bomb deeply and very deeply, and mess up the media that in the event of a threat to Russia's integrity and sovereignty, no one will be left. There will be no Russia, there will be no planet Earth. Gouge the Americans directly through the earth's core. Retribution from the other world. Current dollars will fly in space.

    I fully support. If we lose in the worst war (this is the last option - and we will win)))), then the mega-bomb option will hold anyone, at least NATO, at least the whole world. So they are all tired, they do not give life to live the whole history of existence, there are no more silushki on them.