"Rubber" sell

13
One of the main methods of masking and disinformation of the enemy is the creation of fictitious military bases, on the territory of which are placed models of real military equipment, ranging from aircraft to artillery pieces. But in recent years there has been a debate about the adoption of special pneumatic models of aircraft and armored vehicles for the balance of the Armed Forces of the Russian Federation. Many point to the inexpediency of adopting inflatable devices on the balance of troops, which cannot be misled by the enemy’s intelligence services.

"Rubber" sell


The leadership of the Ministry of Defense of the Russian Federation continues to argue that pneumatic models are necessary for equipping false positions of combined arms units, visual simulation of transportation tanks over long distances by rail and road tractors with heavy trailers. In addition, dummies are used to equip false zones of aircraft concentration (airfields). These measures are designed to divert the enemy's attention from a real, covert redeployment. aviation units from operating military airfields.

The creators of the models claim that their products are not just an exact replica of real military equipment, but also reproduce radiation in the near infrared, thermal and radar range, similar to night vision devices. In the near future will be added and play radio range. Of course, behind all these statements about the technical capabilities of the so-called "rubber" military equipment, its developers forget to mention that all these features are provided with additional systems and special materials, which is not only difficult, but also expensive, for deceiving the enemy.

The Ministry of Defense of the Russian Federation made a decision on annual deliveries to the balance of military units about 100 models of real military equipment. In the near future, the total number of "rubber" military equipment will reach 800 units. But in this case, first of all, the prices of certain samples look amazing, in particular, the layout of the aircraft is estimated at 1,2 million rubles, the tank is somewhat cheaper - 450 thousand rubles. Is it really a normal price for the layout, even if it has additional features?

But in this matter there are a lot of nuances, and they are connected, first of all, with the transportation of mock-ups, which should resemble the redeployment of real combat equipment. As is known, in the transportation of military equipment there are subtleties that the intelligence centers of all states are well aware of.



It seemed that it could be difficult to organize the transportation of prototypes of military equipment on railway platforms - cargo and cargo. But not everything is so simple. Sending a military echelon is a difficult task, it is a whole complex of events in which a large number of representatives from both the Ministry of Defense and Russian Railways take part. It should not be forgotten that a potential adversary can have an agent network in these structures as well as among local residents. After all, the appearance of a tank battalion in a certain area will cause a number of questions from the enemy. What kind of battalion? Place the previous deployment? Which way? Total number of tanks? Accordingly, it is imperceptible and difficult to load air tanks unnoticed by the enemy onto platforms of iron transport. At the same time, it is necessary to take into account the fact that after all the previous re-formations in the air of the “new look” there remains an extremely limited number of tank regiments and tank battalions in separate motorized rifle subunits, the potential adversary is quite well aware of their permanent deployment points. Another important issue is the feature of transporting tanks by rail: the tower is turned back to 180 degrees, and the gun is locked with a towing cable. Accordingly, the layout should be made with a swivel tower.

The most difficult event is the transportation by air, as it will require a huge number of departures of transport aircraft. Of course, one plane can take out all the folded layouts, but you need to simulate the transportation of not one tank, but a whole tank battalion, which at least is 30 tanks. So in terms of money will come out extremely expensive.

When transporting military equipment by water transport, there are also obvious vulnerabilities. If, for example, a military train passing through the western part of the country can easily get lost in a fairly dense railway network, then you can’t say anything about water transport, its path is fairly easy to control.



Layouts can, of course, play a role in the disinformation of the enemy, but no more. For example, in combat, their need is reduced to zero. Apply the "rubber" tank in a real battle is not possible in any form, including distracting. On arms of modern armies there is the equipment capable to distinguish real thermal signals from imitating.

In general, there is no particular sense from mockups that even perfectly imitate real military equipment, and it is obvious that all these developments are nothing but ordinary fraud when armies sell balloons that the wind can carry away at any time. But despite this, the Ministry of Defense continues to order "rubber" military equipment and argue that it is an extremely necessary means of disinformation of the enemy. Or maybe it is not the benefit of the army, and personal gain?
13 comments
Information
Dear reader, to leave comments on the publication, you must sign in.
  1. 0
    21 June 2011 13: 08
    "Or maybe it's not about the army's benefit at all, but personal gain?" - and the author still has doubts ???
  2. Andrei
    0
    21 June 2011 13: 40
    The author is wrong.
    There is experience of a real war - Yugoslavia. And there the camouflage means paid off not even 100 but 1000% - despite the long-term US air operation, the military equipment of the ground forces almost did not suffer any damage. So it’s too early to disguise disguise measures
    1. LESHA pancake
      0
      21 June 2011 14: 37
      Custom Hedgehog article understandable
    2. 0
      21 June 2011 17: 18
      Andrei - of course it’s too early to write off the measures (for this reason, apparently deliveries will soon become the basis for rearmament - their production is Perdyukov’s estate), especially considering their final cost for the army, but if something happens, you’ll probably go off to wet it the enemy. The experience of Yugoslavia (SFRY) is one - it is HISTORY.
  3. 0
    21 June 2011 15: 11
    mustache want to eat and preferably tasty.
  4. Skipper
    Skipper
    +1
    21 June 2011 15: 29
    A little more and the whole army of Russia will become an inflatable
  5. 0
    21 June 2011 16: 41
    Here it is!!! the future of the Russian army, it remains to make inflatable ships and submarines.
  6. Oshkin
    -1
    22 June 2011 01: 57
    Since such "experts" got worried and began to stink, then this technique is just what you need.
  7. passing by
    0
    22 June 2011 10: 43
    To the author for self-education
    http://www.newsweek.com/2000/05/14/the-kosovo-cover-up.html
    About the experience of the Serbs in preserving their technology from NATO bombs with the help of disguise.

    Swindle are such "experts".
  8. Stavr
    Stavr
    +2
    22 June 2011 13: 43
    The wooden Pinocchio was always good at only inflatable women ... I'd rather give a real example, how they rubbed their eyes not to the adversaries, but to their own bosses, who were checking the combat effectiveness of the Russian armored forces. At first, the checking generals were fed and watered to such an extent that they did not even realize that in a nearby forest in the distance, tanks and infantry fighting vehicles were standing and even shooting occasionally, but not on the move. There, even before the start of the exercise, the cunning commanders ordered to tow all the rest of the "dead" armored vehicles with the help of the remaining and only two infantry fighting vehicles that were on the move. As a result, the division received the required grade. They say it is fully operational. It was just that the generals were not shown how the armored vehicles were dragged on ropes to show off. "Necessity for inventions is cunning!" But Taburetkin will soon teach inflatable tanks to shoot, and from his comments "we will fight on what is" it follows more clearly than on the T-34 of the Great Patriotic War! And there are also museums, but if you remove a tank from each monument-pedestal, then ... shake enemies-foes in fear!
  9. Maj.
    Maj.
    0
    22 June 2011 14: 05
    In the 80s he served on the move (Strategic Rocket Forces). When leaving the position, they put stove stoves and metal corner reflectors. Periodically with P-105M went on the air. We pulled the ILC.
    And that’s all. Cheap and cheerful.
    And so a couple of days. Two people provided the work of the "complex".
  10. qwer
    0
    8 July 2011 20: 11
    Soon they will make inflatable machines, who will not get it, they will give a sapper blade. Well, who shovel and pitchfork!
  11. kov
    kov
    0
    31 October 2012 23: 48
    About rubber mockups