NASA presented a project of a starship capable of moving faster than the speed of light

150
Having opened its way to the stars, mankind almost immediately began to dream of interstellar and interplanetary flights. However, time passes, and the man did not fly beyond the moon. To overcome the huge interplanetary distances, mankind needs better engines and spacecraft that could travel at the speed of light. So far, such devices can be found only in the writings of science fiction writers, but time does not stand still. The most daring ideas of science fiction writers often find their graphic and scientific implementation. The same happened with the concept of a spacecraft that could travel across the expanses of the Universe at a speed exceeding the speed of light. The project was presented by NASA scientist Harold White and graphic designer Mark Reidmaker.

Theoretically, traveling at such a speed is possible by using the so-called curvature engine, which generates a wind-field that bends the spatial-temporal continuum. That is what sets such a spacecraft in motion. Harold White is a physicist who has been working on how to overcome the speed of light for many years with the help of spacecraft. Back in 2011, he published his scientific report in which for the first time he presented his concept of movement in space with superlight speed for the public. However, now a team of like-minded people working with him presented a project of a spacecraft, which in practice embodies the designated concept.

It is worth noting that the Dutch artist Mark Reidmaker is already quite well known. He became famous for his series of graphic works based on the Star Trek television series. Reidmaker told reporters on NBC News that he had carefully become acquainted with the works of Harold White, which were made at the NASA Johnson Space Center. According to the artist, the work on the graphic embodiment of the ideas of a NASA physicist took him 3 a month.


According to the presented concept, the space behind the starship will expand at a rapid speed, pushing the ship forward in a straight line. Using this method of moving in space, you can get to Alpha Centauri in just 14 days. Alpha Centauri is the closest star system to Earth, but even it is a great distance away from our planet - 4,3 light years (1 light year is about 9,5 trillion kilometers). White himself says that what was possible in the Star Trek series may not be as distant a prospect as many think.

Work on the device, which could move around the Universe at a speed exceeding the speed of light (299 792 458 m / s), White draws for a long time. He is engaged in research in this direction together with members of the special scientific group of the NASA Space Center. Johnson Here we explore the possibilities of Worp engines. With the help of such an engine, a spacecraft, designated the IXS Enterprise, would be able to carry out space travel at a speed exceeding the speed of light.

Based on the concept of White, which he wants to translate into reality, Mark Redmaker presented a three-dimensional graphic concept of the future interstellar spacecraft. After a rather long study of the works of White, the artist presented to the public a spacecraft of relatively small size, which is located inside two rather large rings. These rings in the vast expanses of space should be used for the proper deformation of time and space. At the same time, work in this direction does not end with the creation of a graphic concept of a spacecraft. A research team from the US space agency recently introduced 12 innovative technologies, which are planned to be implemented in the very near future - over 2 years. And although the IXS Enterprise project is currently mostly at the stage of theoretical development, experimentation and research, the research team sincerely believes that such a ship can be launched on an interplanetary voyage. Researchers believe that such a flight can take place sooner than many people think.


An ambitious, and in some way fantastic, program for designing spaceships capable of traveling at a speed exceeding the speed of light is also known as the project “Speed”. The goal of the project is the development of engines that would allow a person to travel with superlight speed. The basis for this ambitious project was the concept of space deformation, which follows from the equation of the famous physicist Miguel Alcubiere. This equation provides for the creation of such a mechanism that would be able to "deform" the space. We are talking about a space engine curvature, which would expand the space in front of the ship, and behind the opposite - squeezed. Due to this, a space-time “Alcubiera bubble” would form around the spacecraft. Inside this "bubble" the ship could move in space with superlight speed.

It is assumed that this engine will have a spherical shape. It is planned to influence time and space with the help of very strong electrostatic fields. Currently, scientists measure the degree of deformation of the space-time continuum in the course of experiments using a laser interferometer. Their main task for the near future is the development in the laboratory of a microscopic "bubble". In the future, as the energy used to manipulate space, scientists are going to use the dark energy of the universe. According to Harold White, the spacecraft of the future will resemble the shape of an American football ball, girded with a torus.

Information sources:
http://russian.rt.com/article/36267
http://www.techcult.ru/space/1736-nasa-sozdaet-zvezdolet-kotoryj-doletit-do-alfa-centavra-za-dve-nedeli
http://joinfo.ua/hitech/space/940774_Kosmicheskiy-korabl-NASA-mezhzvezdnih-poletov.html#
150 comments
Information
Dear reader, to leave comments on the publication, you must sign in.
  1. +14
    18 June 2014 08: 53
    Saw them in hand.
    1. +13
      18 June 2014 09: 48
      Dreaming is not harmful; it is harmful not to dream. winkThe hunt is all the same to see such a ship, but I understand that it is like walking to Mars. Oh dreams !!!
    2. +5
      18 June 2014 10: 06
      Quote: Yoon Klob
      Saw them in hand.

      Ahead was SDI (strategic defense initiative), sawed off, then they came up with Stealth, F-117 is an aviation legend, no one has built worse than an aircraft, and F-22 and B-2 are record holders, sawed, then Aegis missile defense, well, stuff Missile defense, sailors from "Donald Cook" experienced the effectiveness of missile defense and not all sailors from Chancellorsville (CG-62) will be able to confirm this, because some died when a target hit the side of this ship, sawed, now they decided to build starships, another cut of astronomical scale ...
    3. +6
      18 June 2014 14: 01
      - And the file! And let it be taken into account that "a radio wave in an absolute vauukum flies at the speed of light, and even faster with a fair wind!"
      1. +20
        18 June 2014 15: 05
        This spaceship is plagiarism. In fact, a prototype has already been built and is undergoing interplanetary test flights. The prototype took the spaceship of Ancient Ukrov, using a jet stream of braking engines, the Great Ukrainians dug up the Black Sea. The tests are successful and are close to completion, it is on this starship Poroshenko and Co. intend to constellate constellation from popular retribution.
        1. +1
          20 June 2014 02: 14
          laughing
          Quote: Muadipus
          Great Ukrainians dug up the Black Sea.
          And here are the diggers themselves.
      2. Voronbit
        +3
        18 June 2014 23: 18
        my opinion is that you also need to allocate money for a fairy tale ... otherwise you may not be noticeably in the ass
        1. Voronbit
          0
          18 June 2014 23: 28
          ferry system
        2. Dracula
          +1
          19 June 2014 00: 08
          Yes Yes Give me money for a fairy tale, so that my life would not be such a harsh past.
        3. 0
          19 June 2014 11: 12
          my opinion is that you also need to allocate money for a fairy tale ... otherwise you may not be noticeably in the ass
          Required. But in the accounting documents, at the same time, the expense item must be indicated correctly, as it is: "For fundamental fabulous research"
    4. +1
      18 June 2014 15: 48
      Saw them in hand.

      Rented them over to Hollywood.
      Man is not able to keep up with such speeds.
      It would be better to "fight" the aging of a person - to "cruise" laughing speed at the pace of the waltz to finish, it will come to all the Centaurus there, while not going astray from the monotonous view outside the window during the trip.
      Hollywood for bidding and selling. This purmet is not effective.
      1. -2
        19 June 2014 00: 59
        When I read such scientific nonsense, I laugh. Especially when the "great scientistssoaked "
    5. +3
      18 June 2014 20: 46
      When there was a standoff with the USSR, this could have become a reality in 40-60 years. And now catch, consumption:

      1. 0
        19 June 2014 06: 17
        Ahhh ... so the Chinese also have Ren-Tiwi?))
    6. Horde
      -1
      18 June 2014 22: 23
      the fact that Einstein and others came up with the idea of ​​limiting movement to the speed of light has not been ABSOLUTELY PROVENTED therefore it is not just ridiculous to invent spaceships that will exceed this unverified fact, but to pile on the absurdity of us is all reckless, for example, flying to the moon and a long, long wait for the next American exploits ...
      1. +1
        19 June 2014 02: 00
        In modern academic science, denial of Einstein's theory is equated with anti-Semitism.
      2. +1
        19 June 2014 07: 27
        Generally speaking, most of the relativistic effects arising from the irresistible speed of light predicted by the theory of relativity were confirmed by the study of the microworld. We are talking about particles accelerated in accelerators to light speeds. According to Einstein’s predictions, their life time increases, and their mass increases, etc.
        So everything is not so rosy so far with the "unproven" theory of relativity. The only good news is the presence of serious contradictions with quantum mechanics. Perhaps the resolution of these contradictions in the future will indicate the possibilities and ways, but for now modern physics is forced to recognize all the limitations of Albert's grandfather.
        1. 0
          19 June 2014 09: 07
          Finsler's theory more fully describes space-time than general relativity, and there the speed of light is not a speed limit.
        2. Horde
          0
          19 June 2014 17: 24
          Quote: ussrex
          According to Einstein’s predictions, their life time increases


          time is how you counted? saddled a particle?
  2. +6
    18 June 2014 08: 59
    But what about the "Death Star" ....?
    1. 0
      19 June 2014 02: 01
      Quote: podpolkovnik
      But what about the "Death Star" ....?

      "She drowned" (c)
    2. 0
      19 June 2014 09: 08
      But what about the "Death Star" ....?
      Cresse has already rejected this project, citing a high cost.
  3. +1
    18 June 2014 09: 00
    "Warp - core" burned, in any way?
  4. Varang42
    +9
    18 June 2014 09: 01
    Considering that the USA and the EU have curtailed the development of heavy taxiways, they stupidly have no transporters to put components into orbit ... China will soon fly to the stars than the Americans have time to go there ...
    and yes, the Fed as it’s easier to have slaves on earth than in space new lands ..
  5. +27
    18 June 2014 09: 03
    As a physicist, the reprint of this article disappointed me greatly. Sorry, but I just had to put a minus, as well as a negative comment that I left for another reprint of the same article. As great as all this "graphics" looks, there is a little less science behind it than the truth in the Ukrainian media. There are scientific theories, there are scientific hypotheses. But these are the scientific dreams of some theorists who fail to do something with real work. You have to dream. But not all dreams need to be published. For example, about broads and about superluminal speeds.
    1. +5
      18 June 2014 09: 28
      Being a physicist, reprinting this article really disappointed me.
      The countess, with a changed face, runs to the pond.
    2. +7
      18 June 2014 10: 11
      Quote: nstarinsky
      Being a physicist
      To evaluate this article and this project, you do not need to be a physicist, you need to be an economist here, in order to calculate how much dough you can squeeze from US taxpayers for this project.
      1. +1
        18 June 2014 10: 57
        To evaluate this article and this project, you do not need to be a physicist, you need to be an economist here, in order to calculate how much dough you can squeeze from US taxpayers for this project.
        Look at the root.
        He is engaged in research in this direction together with members of a special scientific group of the NASA Space Center named after Johnson. It explores the power of Worp engines.
        Translating to normal. language understandable to all: "Give me money, I want to eat." Based on this, beautiful pictures are drawn with high detail and accompanied by abundant scientific reasoning.
        Would turn to the Lucas movie. There they’ve designed so much of everything on the topic - don’t mourn. And in a much higher quality. A whole alternative galaxy was painted in detail for 2-3 hundred thousand years: history, technology, biology ...
      2. +6
        18 June 2014 13: 37
        Quote: Canep
        To evaluate this article and this project, you do not need to be a physicist, you need to be an economist here, in order to calculate how much dough you can squeeze from US taxpayers for this project.


        By changing the space-time continuum using negative gravity energy by creating an Alcubierre bubble and a Casimir vacuum, it turns out pockets no worse than the Fed bubble and the vowum in Psaki’s head. In general, the ability to control gravitational fields for humanity can be an order of magnitude more dangerous than the presence of nuclear weapons. The best minds have long fought over this problem, but so far to no avail ...
        1. 0
          29 June 2014 16: 17
          A year ago I read an article in which the author, a theoretical physicist (I don’t remember my name, it was a year ago) talked about the theoretical basis for the possibility of moving above the speed of light, but he pointed out in advance that a lot of this, including the concept of a ship, is so much at the level of unconfirmed concepts and unverified data that you can talk about such ships and projects even after 100 years, there are too many conventions and the unknown and even a purely theoretical verification verification of physical concepts based on which You can build a ship that will accelerate faster than the speed of light in the next few decades.

          I personally would like it to be different, but alas this doesn’t allow not only technical capabilities, but even theoretically approaching this project is not clear from which side.
          1. +3
            14 July 2014 17: 23
            Kadavercianin, I hardly mastered your proposal. Maybe you’ll put the dots more often, or what, eh?
            1. 0
              15 July 2014 08: 38
              hardly mastered your proposal. Maybe you’ll put the dots more often, or what, eh?
              It is impossible. Otherwise, you’ll understand something.
              1. +3
                15 July 2014 14: 58
                Quote: abrakadabre
                It is impossible. Otherwise, you’ll understand something.
                Well, maybe so lol
                1. -1
                  7 August 2014 23: 26
                  And here are the trolls, maybe the commas are no longer kosher? wink
      3. +1
        18 June 2014 18: 25
        What does the US taxpayer have to do with it? The whole world will pay for this next cut
      4. +4
        14 July 2014 17: 20
        Quote: Canep
        To evaluate this article and this project, you don’t need to be a physicist, here you need to be an economist,

        To evaluate this article, just being a sane person is enough.
    3. +7
      18 June 2014 11: 47
      As a graduate of a parish school, I tell you for sure that an iron machine weighing two hundred pounds cannot take to the air. And the rest is from the evil one.
    4. Killingload
      0
      18 June 2014 14: 30
      Do not read newspapers, dear, do not watch telly. There is no truth anywhere
    5. +8
      18 June 2014 15: 36
      Quote: nstarinsky
      As a physicist, the reprint of this article disappointed me greatly. Sorry, but I just had to put a minus, as well as a negative comment that I left for another reprint of the same article. As great as all this "graphics" looks, there is a little less science behind it than the truth in the Ukrainian media. There are scientific theories, there are scientific hypotheses. But these are the scientific dreams of some theorists who fail to do something with real work. You have to dream. But not all dreams need to be published. For example, about broads and about superluminal speeds.

      Or new NASA satellite and astronaut output methods ..
      1. 0
        18 June 2014 17: 12
        Yes, it does not matter physicists, chemists, economists. The main thing is what? Let them spend their money, are fond of fairy tales, whatever the child says, as long as the state does not crawl into revolutions. Failed projects are a US style.
    6. anomalocaris
      +2
      18 June 2014 17: 18
      Well, why not about women? (Baba pile up)
    7. 0
      18 June 2014 17: 39
      Quote: nstarinsky
      An example of women and superluminal speeds.

      About broads, this is somewhat out of reality. The rest is possible only on the ruins of the service station .... so for now, along the well-worn "minks", they have not yet grown to molehills, and we will not grow up.
    8. Voronbit
      0
      18 June 2014 23: 34
      I thought. that in my time you come up with the theory of the field ... but you, philosophers, damn .... wait .... about the concept of time, I do not ask
  6. +11
    18 June 2014 09: 04
    which could

    In theory

    dreams

    fantastic

    It is proposed
    - these are the main words of the article! hi
  7. +2
    18 June 2014 09: 30
    A similar development was already shown in 1977, in the film by a certain George Lucas "Star Wars. A New Hope." Since then, we have not made much progress towards the actual implementation of these innovative ideas. Such sketches are drawn by any more or less talented designer, of course, on new promising engines of gravitational, magnetic resonance, ion-plasma, redudt-cathode, as well as, of course, simplicative-gentron.
    1. +1
      18 June 2014 16: 49
      Quote: Parabelum
      simpativnogentronnyh.

      I cried crying
      what is this MONSTER?
      1. +1
        18 June 2014 17: 08
        Quote: Papakiko
        simulative

        Search engines do not return anything. The search term is present only in this article. smile .
    2. anomalocaris
      +1
      18 June 2014 17: 23
      But the ion-plasma engine is just reality. And, by the way, this is the only type of engine that can provide human population of the solar system. Although in reality it is not as impressive as in the movies.
      1. +2
        18 June 2014 22: 32
        These are low-thrust engines for orbit correction. A similar marching - the same frntastika as the drawing in the article. Any student of this specialty (called "Plasma Engines of Aircraft") will tell you about it.
        All these dreams are beautiful, but they have always crashed into the harsh reality - energy and mass. Even if you assemble the frame of such a station already in orbit, displaying individual blocks, then the issue with energy has not been resolved. What will feed this dragon? No solar and chemical power systems are nearby. All that remains is a nuclear power plant, and this, for the required capacity, together with protection, hundreds of thousands of tons. Any questions?
        1. anomalocaris
          0
          19 June 2014 03: 04
          And there are no alternatives to a nuclear power plant in space. There are no options. Projects of such devices were worked out and they, in general, are quite real.
  8. Antokha
    +8
    18 June 2014 09: 36
    Let them try to copy the RD-180 first, and only then take up the concept of displacements in space with superluminal speed.
  9. AX
    0
    18 June 2014 09: 52
    Grandma said in two ... laughing
  10. Pasus
    0
    18 June 2014 09: 54
    designers are divorced from reality, fact! there are no technologies, no practical developments, even in prototypes, but you cannot forbid dreaming. maybe this is another budget cut plan? In any case, in the next 100-150 years, there will be no progress, everything will remain in the field of theory.
  11. 0
    18 June 2014 09: 57
    They can’t carry theirs to the ISS, but there ...!
  12. 0
    18 June 2014 10: 02
    American "designers" (consider designers with an incomprehensible technical level) do not know what other pictures to draw in order to be given money. HERE is the correct title for this "article"
    1. 0
      18 June 2014 10: 36
      DRAWED THREE MONTHS! And he received a salary at a more national level. Weakly. At least half a year you need to puff and, you see, they will give the state award.
  13. +3
    18 June 2014 10: 05
    It is assumed that this engine will have a spherical shape.

    Spherical horse in a vacuum or what?
  14. +14
    18 June 2014 10: 07
    let it be dreams. let it be fantastic.
    still good. it stimulates the imagination. encourages the desire to "think and do".
    Neil Stevenson once wrote that he was accused by a NASA employee of the fact that now (in the 90s) there is little quality fiction that gives an incentive and a vector. robots, cellular communication, fiber optic. seriously, Star Trek has given a whole generation of space dreamers.

    in addition, people familiar with engineering / biomechanics draw such things. at least good product designers. and these things are not drawn from the lantern.

    I have a book, just an album, called "Do not count the professions of a robot", 1987. the edition is not ours, translated, the original came out a couple of years earlier. not the point. what was fantasy in 1987 is the norm today. by the way, it just describes the "rocket-robot" BGM-109 Tomahawk. Yeah, close up. advanced technology! rounding the relief! jeepies! today jpies is on my phone, along with glonass.

    It seems to me that it’s good when there are such projects. then the spirit of the creator and creator has not died yet.
    1. +3
      18 June 2014 11: 02
      let it be dreams. let it be fantastic.
      still good. it stimulates the imagination. encourages the desire to "think and do". Neil Stevenson once wrote that he was accused by a NASA employee of the fact that now (in the 90s) there is not enough high-quality fiction that provides an incentive and a vector.
      But fantasies need to be based on some kind of basis. Namely education. And its level falls catastrophically. Therefore, literate science fiction is becoming less and less. And more and more in the style of "Captain America". Which is actually a variant of sorcerers and knights in a pseudo-scientific entourage.
      1. +5
        18 June 2014 11: 20
        the average hospital level of education is falling. because the people are just getting bigger.
        literate science fiction is becoming no less. genres have changed. everything shifted from space and the future to the "present on earth". space and the future are not fashionable these days. this is exactly what the claim to Stevenson was. well, he is also not a "space writer", his niche is "cyber-punk".

        Captain America incidentally is an ancient comic book. the fact that they are being filmed today is strictly the merits of a couple of companies that chop cabbage on old hits. and there are many hits.

        It seems to me that the frenzy from the technical breakthroughs of the 20th century has faded away. now, all over the world, small inventions are presented as scientific achievements of the century. when Steve Jobs died, as soon as he was not called. up to "Leonardo Da Vinci has died of modern times." admit that he was oh, how far away from Leonardo. in 10 years no one will remember. people are just tired of daily discoveries of this kind.
      2. +1
        19 June 2014 01: 20
        Well, you know. Phaniasia can be developed, not only in space. A mixture of space with a fantasy-explosive mixture. And suddenly, humanity will go through space and spiritual-physical magicians, spirits, telekinesis, chi
    2. anomalocaris
      +1
      18 June 2014 17: 28
      Uh-huh. If anyone in 1987 published the scheme of the "Legends" operation, then the creators of the GPS died of envy ... As well as the Boeing engineers, if they knew about the X-55.
      True, then, the publisher would have lived to the end of his days somewhere in the area of ​​Vilyuisk ...
    3. 0
      18 June 2014 20: 43
      Quote: Bigfoot_Sev
      it’s good when there are such projects. then the spirit of the creator and creator has not died yet.

      The road will be overcome by a walker! - Viam supervadet vadens!
    4. Volkhov
      +1
      22 June 2014 18: 59
      The publication has at least 2 true principles from real ships, so despite the rest of the rubbish it’s not a dummy.
    5. +4
      14 July 2014 17: 43
      Quote: Bigfoot_Sev
      let it be dreams. let it be fantastic.

      what was science fiction in xnumx today is the norm

      That's right, the trouble is that before science fiction was a reflection of scientific success, now - science has become increasingly replaced by fantasy.
  15. +5
    18 June 2014 10: 10
    Well, people at least look into the future and spend money on interesting things. With us, Vasilyeva simply buys an apartment and a half kilogram of gold, or pigs compete with someone whose yacht is longer. Personally, I wish people success, all of a sudden what happens.
    1. dmb
      0
      18 June 2014 14: 23
      And they forgot on these stars there, neither women, nor cold beer for you. Again, you will not watch football in time and you will not listen to timothy (with a small letter because it is not a surname, but a sexual orientation).
      1. +3
        18 June 2014 15: 53
        Quote: dmb
        And they forgot on these stars there, neither women, nor cold beer for you.
        - what if there is everything there! laughing
      2. anomalocaris
        +1
        18 June 2014 17: 31
        Is there happiness in women? Come on, there are planets where oceans of vodka and sea of ​​beer are!
  16. +4
    18 June 2014 10: 26
    In fact, the era of long-distance space travel will begin when the theoretical legacy of Albert Einstein is solemnly flushed down the toilet.
    1. Kir
      +2
      18 June 2014 21: 12
      But the trouble is, He is Einstein, let's say, not the sole author of everything that is attributed to him, this is one other thing that in parallel with "his" theory there has long been a theory of locally anisotropic space-time, according to which the speed of light is not constant, so .. ...
  17. +4
    18 June 2014 10: 37
    About Eestein is very correct. As long as science rests on his theories, no one will fly anywhere. And the second one. Before you bend space with enthusiasm, you need to figure out - will not our Mother planet fall down there? And often the games of scientists resemble the game of a monkey with a grenade.
    1. +3
      18 June 2014 10: 43
      By the way, the notorious exam was invented in order not to question the modern scientific paradigm. There is a zombie of scientific thought in the early stages of development among promising young scientists.
    2. +2
      18 June 2014 13: 56
      - Right! All experimental scientists must submit an abstract on the Strugatskys' book "Distant Rainbow".
  18. +1
    18 June 2014 10: 49
    Well, why fly to Centaurus alpha, just because it is closer, the Tau Ceti has the same spectrum as the Sun, and looks much more interesting :-)
    1. +3
      18 June 2014 20: 47
      Tau Ceti will not go anywhere, but for a test flight it is better to take a closer look.
  19. +4
    18 June 2014 10: 52
    Or maybe this is really possible, because 150 years ago they seriously discussed whether a person could survive if he moved at a speed of 100 km / h.
    When the Americans proclaimed the SDI project, ours created in response the Pole and the Salute station. Now, if the Americans support this program, I’m even afraid to imagine what ours will be able to create in response.
    Yes, let many say that Roskosmos drank this dough, and protons fall, but I really want to believe that bright minds that could become next to S.P. Korolev and his team.
    1. +1
      18 June 2014 11: 09
      Here are just the achievements of modern Western civilization, these are not the values ​​that should be spread across the limitless expanses of the universe.
    2. +4
      14 July 2014 19: 32
      Quote: jayich
      Or maybe this is really possible, because 150 years ago they seriously discussed whether a person could survive if he moved at a speed of 100 km / h.

      Let's not confuse the ways of knowing nature with frankly idiotic ideas. For 1000 years you can still thicken fluids, distill mercury and turn dragons, but the lead in gold in the retort will not appear from this. And improve the theory of Aristotle, refute Lomonosov and Mendeleev, come up with new chemistry - the result will be the same.
  20. -1
    18 June 2014 10: 58
    I doubt it ... they can’t learn the engines for launch vehicles .. they’re buying from us .. and here .. If for good, without Russia, the USA it’s impossible to build such an engine ...
  21. -2
    18 June 2014 11: 21
    Americans need to be fastened-say that we created a prototype of such an engine, tested and scrambled. After that, all of America will begin to design anti-gravity from improvised means to overtake us. Here the loot will be thrown into the wind fool
    1. -1
      18 June 2014 20: 49
      And if they do, who will laugh?
      1. +3
        14 July 2014 19: 34
        Quote: Bayonet
        And if they do, who will laugh?

        And if the Earth is flat, who will be right?
    2. Kir
      0
      18 June 2014 21: 17
      Well, in their minds, they really need to give them something, let's say how they did it with Fu-117, and by the way, don't doubts overwhelm you on the basis of the works of the "Aryan" genius, a forester by occupation and an acultist, in fact, Staunberg?
  22. -1
    18 June 2014 11: 31
    a fairy tale in terms of implementation ... and a dream ... it would be better to take care of this than the world order ... although ... they can't even bring out satellites without us, the supply of engines has stopped (rocket for launching satellites) and immediately there are problems they have .... and here already "interstellar yacht" nonsense ... another fake
  23. Cpa
    +1
    18 June 2014 11: 36
    To use antimatter, ultra-powerful magnetic fields are needed to store it and direct reaction products. Really, flying 14 light years will not bump into anything along the way. Without gravity 14 years in zero gravity is a sure death. The pinch effect invented in 1975 has not yet been reproduced. not enough energy, but already taken up antimatter laughing
    1. -9
      18 June 2014 12: 02
      There is no anti-matter in nature and cannot be. It is only found in paper publications of "scientists"
      1. +3
        18 June 2014 14: 11
        google positron
        1. -6
          18 June 2014 22: 11
          what is this anti-matter. The same whirlwind, but swirling in the opposite direction. The nut on the left and the nut on the right are equally material.
          1. +3
            14 July 2014 19: 38
            Quote: RESEARCHER
            what is this anti-matter. The same whirlwind, but swirling in the opposite direction. The nut on the left and the nut on the right are equally material.

            Anti-matter is just a term; they simply didn’t come up with another then. And from the point of view of materialist philosophy, you are absolutely right: both the electron and the positron are quite material, that is, they exist objectively and outside of our knowledge of them.
      2. Cpa
        +3
        18 June 2014 15: 11
        The antihydrogen atom was first observed in 1995 in the SP20 experiment at the LEAR accelerator at CERN. In the 2002 year, two communities at once - ATRAP and ATHENA - synthesized and for a long time held relatively cold antihydrogen in significant quantities, on the order of 50 000 000 atoms. Currently, these groups are investigating anti-hydrogen spectroscopy and other properties of the resulting antimatter.

        In 2010, participants in the ALPHA experiment at CERN published an article stating that they were able to not only create antihydrogen atoms, but also to keep them in a special trap for 0,1 — 0,2 seconds [1] [2] [3]. In the 2011 year, this time was increased to 17 minutes
        1. -3
          18 June 2014 19: 11
          DO NOT make me laugh with these experiments. These are just interpretations of the experiment using anti-matter, and not anti-matter itself. You still say that the Higgs boson really found. In nature, such a particle does not exist. It is only possible with the standard model.
          1. +3
            18 June 2014 19: 34
            "... - To hell, ten in the eleventh does not happen! This is a stretch, deception.
            - Chick, the surest way to be deceived is to consider yourself more cunning than others. Therefore, let's take ten in the eleventh ... "D. Granin" I'm going into a thunderstorm "
          2. Kir
            +1
            18 June 2014 21: 27
            Why did you stick to the term anti ..... that besides this there are no other patented names in the World? Simply put, anti-matter is simple one of the forms of this very matter. And then why climb into such a jungle if Mankind has not yet been born a worthwhile Theory on Ball Lightning, although it seems the whole history of the human race coexists nearby.
    2. 0
      19 June 2014 11: 59
      The pinch effect invented in 1975 has not yet been reproduced.
      What kind of pinch effect are you talking about? With which they are fighting, then are they fighting in Tokamaki and synchrophasatrons?
  24. +1
    18 June 2014 11: 53
    yeah, let’s think of a current field of force, or a super system for knocking down and transforming asteroids into molecules, which are dark in the path - for a fist-sized pebble is enough to make a hole through through this ship, given such an estimated speed of the ship :)
  25. MSA
    MSA
    +1
    18 June 2014 12: 04
    Another American cartoon created on the assumptions.
  26. 0
    18 June 2014 12: 06
    Back in the eighties, while studying at the Moscow Aviation Institute named after Godovikov (hey! Respond classmates :)), I read the book "Starships of the Future" to holes, unfortunately I do not remember the authors. A lot of interesting projects were written there, and not as fantastic as this one, but quite realizable ones. True in a very distant future. And with not only theoretical, but also technical calculations. Here, the article resembles another scenario for a "summer" blockbuster with a sort of scientific basis. In general, in the United States (and in our country, to our great regret), it is rather tight at the present time with good science fiction that can really ignite. More and more, the so-called "battle fiction", blasters, brave space marines, destroying hordes of "Aliens". Here in the photo of this reading matter, a more or less scientific project looks so fresh.
    PS Concerning Einstein in the message of the Researcher! BRAVO! Sorry I can’t put ten pluses!
    1. Kir
      +2
      18 June 2014 21: 30
      Correctly there were the projects of Koshkin with his Photon engine and the blessed memory of Academician Aleksandrov with his rocket with a thermonuclear engine.
  27. +3
    18 June 2014 12: 24
    It would be better if they developed the Magic Wand project. Then just wave and say any desire. And all will be happy. smile
    1. 52
      +1
      18 June 2014 15: 16
      Nooo! This is a genuine British development, and the islanders will not give up this project for any carriages, including a license! laughing
  28. +3
    18 June 2014 14: 01
    brains for psaki better come up with smile
    1. 52
      +4
      18 June 2014 15: 21
      Well, do not put before the scientists the mattress of the land of fantastic and impossible tasks! Brains for Psyaka, a dreamer. You are sort of ... That interstellar ship, yes, more real! laughing
      1. +3
        14 July 2014 19: 45
        Quote: 52gim
        Brains for Psyaka, a dreamer. You are sort of.

        Bravo! good fellow
  29. 0
    18 June 2014 14: 23
    But what about the light inside the spaceship, will it also lag behind? fool and how will they fly in the dark? fool
  30. +5
    18 June 2014 14: 37
    "The mice came to the wise owl to ask for advice on how to avoid the fate of being eaten by impudent cats. The owl tells them:" Become hedgehogs. If you are prickly, no one will eat you! "Stunned with delight, the mice ran home, came to their senses and returned to the owl." Owl, tell me - how can we become hedgehogs? "And the Owl answered them:" My business is strategy! "

    How simple it all turns out. It is only necessary to build an engine that warps space. This is brilliant. And how could scientists not have guessed this before?
  31. +1
    18 June 2014 14: 44
    Judging by the foregoing and the drawings, these people are very far from science and technology.
  32. +4
    18 June 2014 14: 58
    The article says that one of the scientists of nasa is not the development of nasa, it is just the entertainment of one of the scientists. And dreaming about the stars is possible and necessary. I read science fiction with great interest. Unfortunately modern science fiction writers. they’re writing absolute crap now. But the modern rocket engine in speed has actually reached its limit. can increase power. but the speed is almost ultimate. And its further evolution will in no way lead to stellar velocity. Surely for flights to the stars you need a completely different physical principle. And to search for it, you need to develop fundamental science. Although it may be something like this exists on earth. but we don’t know how to apply it. as an example, gunpowder and firearms can be cited; before the firearm people used the property of elasticity of the material. They created onions, and improved it, onions, glued onions. catapults, crossbows. Meanwhile, the Chinese have long since invented gunpowder. and they fired salutes into the sky, not even realizing that they had powerful weapons in their hands. There are also some things that we use, but science cannot explain why this thing works ...... Bicycle, modern science cannot explain why a moving bicycle does not fall. A moving bicycle does not fall, contrary to all the laws of modern science.
    1. 52
      +3
      18 June 2014 15: 31
      I agree, Colleague! For a long time, the land of fantasy did not give birth to either the Strugatskys, or the Frank Russells, or even more so the "Great Masters of Fantasy". It's a pity, but we are waiting ... fellow
    2. +3
      18 June 2014 20: 26
      The speed of the ship is limited by the rate of expiration of the gas molecules, for this is the reactive principle. If I remember correctly, this is 3 km / s. Tested NRE gave 7000-9000 m / s, but hemorrhoids and dangerous. Long abandoned all.
      And in Dubna for several years, they built a photonic dviglo with 2 thrust. at the output.))) It can accelerate to the speed of light at the appropriate power. 8 years of acceleration and the same amount of braking. The question is energy.
      And what is unclear with the lisapeds? The track of the wheels is always a sinusoid, and the projection of the center of gravity along the axis. Plus the gyroscopic effect of the wheels.
      1. +2
        19 June 2014 07: 57
        Not quite right, at a speed of 3 km.s. (which is lower than the 1st cosmic velocity) a rocket (or rather its load) would not have entered orbit.
        1. -1
          19 June 2014 12: 54
          Apparently you do not quite understand the meaning of cosmic speeds. Cosmic speeds relate to non-moving objects such as stone, bullet projectile, etc. If at the moment of the throw the object has a suitable speed, then it will overcome the attraction of the planet, the Sun, system, galaxy, etc. Objects equipped with engines can move anywhere with any speed limited by the capabilities of the propulsion system and rationality.
          A simple example. It is known that attraction depends on distance, i.e. on the surface of the Earth, its attraction is the strongest. But this does not prevent climbers with the speed of a tortoise to climb 9 kilometers using only muscle strength. As the altitude increases, the attraction will decrease and the ascent will become easier and easier. In other words, if we have a "ladder to heaven", you can climb it as slowly as you like.
          Now for the serg-russ who is afraid of dust. In general, all fantastic pictures of starships are fantasies devoid of rationality. The spacecraft will look like a finger-type battery. On the "minus" bottom of which there will be an armor plate 200 mm thick, which will allow you to calmly keep the blows of sand fractions at near-light speeds. The resistance of the hydrogen "atmosphere" of space will also not create any difficulties, because the atmosphere of the earth does not create insurmountable problems with heating and structural strength for modern aircraft with a speed of about 1000 km / h at the surface of the earth. If we talk about light speeds in space, then the actual speed will grow by 9 orders of magnitude, and the density of the cosmic "atmosphere" will fall by 20-25 orders of magnitude. The main difficulty lies elsewhere. When moving at near-light speeds, the pilot will be in an information vacuum. For at such a speed, he will not have either optical or radio information. And the ability to maneuver too. If you encounter an obstacle larger than sand, the consequences will be catastrophic.
          I see another solution to displacements in space. More "rational" if I may say so. It's about teleportals aka "stargate". Those. in a suitable place, the robot probe (which can be risked and which does not care how long it takes to fly to the place) deploys a teleport, and people can be moved through it. Or you can transfer a "cast of the brain" and mount it into a perfect physically created clone (an advanced version of the Avatar).
          1. Volkhov
            0
            22 June 2014 19: 09
            Quote: Anthropos
            When driving at near-light speeds, the pilot will be in the information vacuum. For at this speed he will have neither optical nor radio information. Yes, and the ability to maneuver too.

            Around the ship is a field with transient parameters and everything is visible.
          2. +3
            14 July 2014 19: 57
            Quote: Anthropos
            But this does not prevent climbers from climbing the 9 kilometer-high altitude using the speed of a turtle using only muscular strength. With increasing height, the attraction will decrease and the rise will be easier and easier.

            The difference in gravity at the height of Everest and at sea level is insignificant for use for practical purposes.

            Apparently you do not quite understand the meaning of cosmic speeds. Cosmic speeds relate to non-moving objects such as stone, bullet projectile, etc. If at the moment of the throw the object has a suitable speed, then it will overcome the attraction of the planet, the Sun, system, galaxy, etc.
            This speed should be in our conditions 8 km / s. And they get it at the final flight site with the help of engines having a gas flow rate of the order of 3-4 km / s. Nobody has yet canceled the law of conservation of momentum.
            1. +2
              15 July 2014 08: 48
              But this does not prevent climbers from climbing the 9 kilometer-high altitude using the speed of a turtle using only muscular strength. With increasing height, the attraction will decrease and the rise will be easier and easier.

              As it is correctly said, this effect certainly exists, but its magnitude is so small that it is overlapped by several orders of magnitude by the negative effects of hypoxia and banal fatigue. Not to mention the weather and other "pleasant" little things.
              Nobody has yet canceled the law of conservation of momentum.
              It looks like you are tossing beads ... These are too complicated concepts for your opponent.
              1. +3
                15 July 2014 15: 03
                Quote: abrakadabre
                It looks like you are tossing beads ... These are too complicated concepts for your opponent.
                Damn teacher’s habit: get an understanding at least at a primitive level. True, it does not always work out ...
                1. +2
                  16 July 2014 10: 02
                  True, it does not always work out ...
                  I understand you perfectly. But what's the point of trying to reach out ... for example, stools?
                  Unfortunately, there is a similar case. In order to prepare for the dispute, you will have to, first, tutor with your opponent at a high school course of 5-6 years. And even more. And then, subject to the diligent cooperation of the student.
      2. +3
        14 July 2014 19: 52
        Quote: Anthropos
        The speed of the ship is limited by the rate of expiration of the gas molecules, for this is the reactive principle. If I remember correctly, this is 3 km / s.

        The maximum possible using oxidizing agents based on fluorine compounds - 4500 - 5000 m / s.
    3. +3
      24 July 2014 22: 57
      Quote: Free Wind
      modern science cannot explain why a moving bicycle does not fall. A moving bicycle does not fall, contrary to all the laws of modern science.

      And what, the gyroscopic effect has already been canceled?
      1. -2
        29 July 2014 10: 17
        Quote: BM-13
        And what, the gyroscopic effect has already been canceled?

        If there is a gyroscopic effect in the movement of a bicycle, then it is very insignificant. Otherwise, the steering wheel would have to be turned with an effort equal to the weight of the cyclist + bicycle. And even a very slow ride does not lead to a fall.

        Quote: Free Wind
        Bicycle, modern science cannot explain why a moving bicycle does not fall. A moving bicycle does not fall, contrary to all the laws of modern science.

        It’s strange. I found an explanation. Although not right away. I had to ponder.
        Everything is simple. When the bike is standing, gravity works and it is difficult to maintain balance. But when the bike moves, it bumps into the road. And a man with a taxi to the side of falling keeps his balance. Those. the force of inertia of movement forward is opposed to the force of gravity acting downward through the lever - the supporting surface of the road.
        For example, when we fall to the left, then sharply turning to the left you can maintain balance, even sharper turn - and we will fall to the right side.
        1. +3
          11 August 2014 21: 40
          Quote: Petrix
          If there is a gyroscopic effect in the movement of a bicycle, then it is very insignificant.

          If you take the trouble to calculate the moment of rotation, you will see that the value, although not astronomical, is just significant. It is she who allows you to ride a bike "without hands". And at high speed, you can already feel the difference in the turning effort of the bullet compared to standing still.

          Otherwise, the steering wheel would have to be turned with an effort equal to the weight of the cyclist + bicycle.
          And here it is - it is not clear.

          Your very naive arguments about the mechanics of motion indicate a clear failure in the course of physics. No offense, but it's all so wrong that I don’t even want to comment.
          1. -3
            12 August 2014 11: 16
            Quote: Alex
            No offense, but it's all so wrong that I don’t even want to comment.

            No offense. However, I showed everything clearly without abstruse formulas with a reference to physics courses. The main thing is to understand the principle. And I do not want to comment because you can’t argue against the facts.

            Quote: Alex
            moment of rotation, you will see that the value, although not astronomical, is just significant. It is she who allows you to ride a bike "without hands"

            This value is only enough to keep the steering wheel from turning around the axis of the front pillar, and then a little bit. Hang out the wheel, spin it, try turning the steering wheel. Not so hard. Therefore, the torque is very small. They even reduce it - did you see cross bikes? Their rim is very thin - this reduces the torque (gyroscopic effect) and the cyclist is less tired of turning the wheel over long distances.

            Quote: Alex
            And at high speed you can already feel the difference in the effort of rotation of the bullet compared to standing still.

            So I say: even on small speeds where the rotation moment is completely insignificantIt’s already easy to balance. Conclusion - the moment of rotation is not related to equilibrium.

            Quote: Alex

            Otherwise, the steering wheel would have to be turned with an effort equal to the weight of the cyclist + bicycle.
            And here it is - it is not clear.

            Moreover, if the moment of rotation holds the weight, then in order to turn the wheel, a proportional force must be applied. Let's say 2 wheels rotate to support the entire weight (take 80 kg - the mass of the system), to turn you need to apply a force of about 40 kg.
            But this is not so. In another way - lock the front wheel from turning - and you will not be able to drive (only if you are dispersed). Conclusion - the balance is maintained by steering in the direction of the fall.
            1. 0
              13 August 2014 10: 08
              Their rim is very thin - this reduces the torque (gyroscopic effect) and the cyclist is less tired of turning the wheel over long distances.
              No offense, but you mixed warm with soft. For sports road bikes, the rim is thinner for two BASIC reasons:
              1. The friction (drag) force decreases - you get tired less at extra long distances. If you do not believe me, try to accelerate on the highway and ride at high speed on a highway and on an off-road bike with wide tires. A very big difference in the effort. Equivalent experience6 on the road, drive along asphalt and sand.
              2. weight is reduced.
              And that someone there gets tired of turning the steering wheel over a long distance is nonsense. You might think there the frequency and amplitude of rotation as on a carousel. Have you ever cycled 70-100 km at a time? I drove. Believe me, pedaling is much more tedious than turning a steering wheel. And the back is numb from a bent position. And the saddle presses the ass and rubs the sweat into it so that then you can walk for a long time afterwards from a habit without getting used to it.
              And you say the wheel ...
              1. 0
                13 August 2014 10: 45
                Quote: abrakadabre
                you mixed warm with soft.

                Quote: abrakadabre
                And that someone there gets tired of turning the steering wheel over a long distance is nonsense.

                Yes. I agree. Friction, air resistance and weight are reduced. These are the main reasons. My example is unsuccessful.
                But this is not the question "what keeps the cyclist from falling?" It does not hold the moment of rotation on the wheel, but the force of inertia directed in the direction of travel. After all, sneakers do not fall like mountain ones when driving slowly, despite the lower torque of the wheels.
  33. +4
    18 June 2014 15: 08
    If it works out, I will rejoice for all of humanity
    If not, then only for Americans laughing
  34. +1
    18 June 2014 15: 12
    NASA introduced ..... a spaceship .. capable of moving faster than the speed of light
    And since at the time of the show it was moving, then NO ONE could see it ... In the final speech, the Director of NASA said: "It's a pity that we never saw the head of the transport department .... oooo starship"
  35. -1
    18 June 2014 15: 23
    A weak scientists to lure? As Americans, Soviet scientists used to drag. You need to step in all directions!
    1. +1
      22 June 2014 11: 15
      A little to think for yourself! Yes
  36. serg_russ
    +1
    18 June 2014 15: 23
    At this speed, the stardust will leave only memories of the "ship" ...
    1. +1
      22 June 2014 11: 22
      But what if this engine can change space-time in such a way that even stars can penetrate it? am
  37. +1
    18 June 2014 15: 31
    And they will fly on it (sorry to the moderator) on x ... laughing
  38. panandrey
    +4
    18 June 2014 15: 39
    NASA cannot build an RD-180 engine similar in efficiency. Even more than that, stupidly cannot build the RD-180 engine according to the drawings.
    But in the near future he hopes to build a superlight engine! Precisely file as a gift.
    PS What does the RD-180 engine have to do with it? Judging by the appearance of this wunderwafe, it will not be able to start from the Earth, which means that it will start from orbit. Parts of the spacecraft will be delivered from the Earth.
    1. 0
      22 June 2014 11: 33
      Why are you clinging to the RD-180. After all, it’s not fools who live there and they are very good at counting money (they spent just $ 5 billion on the conquest of Ukraine, and not like some 200 billion and to no avail). It was cheaper for them to buy this engine in Russia than to develop their own. And now they will take care of their own and it is not known who will be better. request
  39. +2
    18 June 2014 16: 01
    It's easy to draw a fantasy design. But let's see how they did it. There is a jet behind the ship. Probably this ship needs some kind of classic jet engine (electro-jet, probably). But then this engine must release the jet so that the center of mass is on its axis. Now we look at the picture (first). Two rings are attached to the "axis" with one massive "spoke". True, there is some kind of thickening on the front axle on the opposite side, but it is too visually small and close to the axle to compensate for the moment of inertia of the spoke. If, for example, the density in this spoke and in the thickening is the same, then it is clear that the spoke will outweigh. In addition, if you apply a ruler, you can see that the main thick extension of the axis is itself shifted towards the spoke. Probably meant that a small thickening is balanced by a thick, not a knitting needle. Therefore, when this engine is turned on, the ship will turn towards the spoke. And he will not fly anywhere. That is, they were unable to draw.
  40. +1
    18 June 2014 16: 57
    Well, finally, I remember the "crazy" scientist said that nothing (material object) can move faster than the speed of light (what is the theory there), but no, the American scientist said and decided to build a superluminal ship, albeit in the picture, well just Dzhidai from science, bravo ...
    1. -2
      22 June 2014 11: 44
      Well, it's just that this "crazy" scientist himself has not yet overcome the speed of light. After all, he had very vague notions about space and time and did not even hear about dark matter, but in general only the future of mankind is behind its development! laughing
  41. +2
    18 June 2014 17: 15
    On Lukomorye, it’s good to say about warp: https://lurkmore.to/%C2%E0%F0%EF

    "In the scary thriller" Through the Horizon "(aka" Event Horizon "), the research ship, having activated such a warp drive to jump to another point in the galaxy, disappeared for 7 years, and then emerged back near Neptune. There was no connection, it came. only one message with wild screams. A group of rescuers arrived at the scene, and it turned out that the ship had been to hell, also, to the Warp. The whole crew, getting stupefied, quickly cut themselves, gobbled up (meat grinder attached). gnome laughing ), which through ugly visions and eerie "accidents", without showing itself, drank almost all the rescuers. The result was that half of the ship, together with the hellish essence and the main character, flew back to hell (warp), and the other half remained in orbit, which saved two rescuers (it is also possible that the hellish essence of the ship remained on the other half of the ship)
    In other games and works, the topic of another dimension is also actively discussed, but any use for the sake of profit and goodies is not practiced there. "
  42. +2
    18 June 2014 18: 38
    I myself do not like the conclusions from the SRT (Special Theory of Relativity), but a "physicist" proposing projects for superluminal ships must first refute SRT, and then amaze readers with their flight of imagination. And first of all, refute the main philosophical conclusion from SRT: Information cannot be transmitted faster than the speed of light. This is the main thing, not the curvature of space.
    1. -1
      18 June 2014 19: 41
      Do not confuse information with the banal transverse electromagnetic oscillations of a physical vacuum or ether. As you like. As for the service station and even general relativity, all this has long been all exposed.
      1. Cpa
        +2
        18 June 2014 20: 53
        Quote: RESEARCHER
        Do not confuse information with the banal transverse electromagnetic oscillations of a physical vacuum or ether.

        What is ether? Physical vacuum? Banal transverse vibrations? laughing
        Quote: RESEARCHER
        . As for the service station and even general relativity, all this has long been all exposed.

        Who is exposed by you, give work to read? What model are you relying on?
        1. 0
          18 June 2014 21: 34
          I'm late too. Exposed before me and even before the birth of Einstein himself. But since you still don’t know about it, it means you don’t really need it.
          1. Cpa
            0
            18 June 2014 23: 22
            Oh caught up with the fog, but oh well, I can’t know everything, as well as you wink
            1. -2
              19 June 2014 02: 25
              But you don’t need to know everything. But it is desirable to understand. Currently, physics has been struck by a systemic crisis from which she is not trying to get out.
              1. -4
                19 June 2014 08: 31
                And further!!!. Dear colleagues, who are so amicably minus. The school curriculum in physics is not such a weighty argument to prove anything to them. You really open the face and prove your position.
                1. 0
                  19 June 2014 12: 29
                  The school curriculum in physics is not such a weighty argument to prove anything to them.
                  To get started, get at least her. And for this discussion, this basis is quite enough. You can not involve a university course in this case.
                  But it is not fate that is visible. Therefore, the approach: you do not know physics (and GR and STO in particular), but condemn it.
                2. +3
                  14 July 2014 23: 27
                  Quote: RESEARCHER
                  You really open the face and prove your position.

                  Actually, EMNIP, this is a site about military equipment (although it’s not clear what the hell out of here is to post frankly pseudoscientific articles). Sites on the problems of theoretical physics are located at other addresses.

                  By the way, and you yourself will be someone by training? You can’t learn much from your profile.
          2. 0
            19 June 2014 12: 26
            I'm late too. Exposed before me and even before the birth of Einstein himself. But since you still don’t know about it, it means you don’t really need it.
            Snowstorm DETEKTED!
          3. +3
            14 July 2014 23: 24
            Quote: RESEARCHER
            I'm late too.

            That's so annoying, the Nobel was taken from under the nose.

            Exposed before me and even before the birth of Einstein himself.
            How can one expose what has not yet been created? Trouble!
            1. +3
              17 July 2014 18: 53
              Quote: Alex

              Exposed before me and even before the birth of Einstein himself.
              How can one expose what has not yet been created? Trouble!

              Bravo! Cool done!
      2. +3
        14 July 2014 23: 22
        Quote: RESEARCHER
        As for the service station and even general relativity, all this has long been all exposed.

        Avon how! And what is instead of her? Half-mythical torsion fields?
    2. -4
      22 June 2014 12: 13
      Well, my dear, you are apparently poorly watching the state of modern science. But what about practically instantaneous and unlimited distance transmission of information about the state (back, etc.) from one atom to another that neutrinos have a speed higher than the speed of light and, in the end, about Kozyrev’s real experiments, which determined the position of the star in the place that the light flux emanating from it showed, which indicates that there is radiation slightly higher than the speed of light! And in general, real scientists are already digging into this service station. For example, for the entire time of space exploration, a change in time has not been detected, as indicated by STO. am
      1. +3
        14 July 2014 23: 40
        Quote: borad
        Well, my dear, you are apparently poorly watching the state of modern science.
        But you, as you can see, are a great specialist in alternative knowledge. Otherwise, you would know that there is no
        almost instantaneous and unlimited distance transferring information about the state (back, etc.) from one atom to another
        . Information on the spin state of the atomic nucleus appears only in the zone of action of strong interactions, i.e. at distances comparable to the size of the core itself. As for the electron spin, it generally matters only when a chemical bond between the atoms is formed and, being a quantized quantity, changes it randomly and spontaneously (the lifetime of each such state is vanishingly small compared to any other characteristic of the atom), without transferring it anywhere - all quantum processes obey statistical laws.

        Also, would you know that phrase
        neutrinos have a speed above the speed of light
        generally represents the height of illiteracy. The neutrino with its zero rest mass has the speed of light, which is quite enough for him. But even if we assume that it has a speed and is greater than the speed of light, then by what device (method) was this recorded?

        And finally - a masterpiece!
        for the entire time of space exploration, a change in time has not been detected, as indicated by STO.
        Relativistic effects (and time dilation is just one of them) begin with relativistic velocities, and these are values ​​of the order of 0,3 C and more. Your argument is akin to that. with whom one village father tried to slay me: "Not a single monkey has turned into a man."
        1. 0
          15 July 2014 08: 54
          Relativistic effects (and time dilation just applies to them) begin with relativistic speeds, and these are values ​​of the order of 0,3 C and more.
          If to be completely corrosive and precise, they don’t start, and the magnitude of such changes increases to values ​​that could be measured instrumentally.
          1. +3
            15 July 2014 15: 06
            Quote: abrakadabre
            If to be completely corrosive and precise, they don’t start, and the magnitude of such changes increases to values ​​that could be measured instrumentally.
            Truly so! In theory, even a snail gets heavier wink .
      2. +2
        15 July 2014 09: 00
        For example, for the entire time of space exploration, a change in time has not been detected, as indicated by STO.
        Everything has been discovered for a long time. Incidentally, accelerator physicists use this very much. Some short-lived elementary particles have a life time of vanishingly small fractions of a second (at low speeds). And dispersed in the accelerator to relativistic speeds, minutes and even tens of minutes.
        And this happens exactly in accordance with TO.
  43. +2
    18 June 2014 19: 02
    How much time they will accelerate to the speed of light. And what will happen to the person in this situation. can run psaki for experiments. look back come back wiser. Or the alpha centaur saw who flies towards them to flock towards us in a crowd.
  44. +2
    18 June 2014 19: 55
    Americans will draw what they’ll draw on so it’s all over and it might end up printing money for embodiment
    1. 0
      22 June 2014 12: 27
      In vain you are so much about Americans. It is not sad, but so far all the major discoveries are being made there now and not in Russia. Apparently this is primarily due to the dough, which we have sorely lacking and those that are, we do not know how to spend wisely, although we have enough Jews in the government. recourse
      1. +4
        14 July 2014 23: 45
        Quote: borad
        In vain you are so about Americans. It is not sad, but so far all the major discoveries are being made there now and not in Russia. Apparently this is primarily due to the dough,

        They themselves noted that the discoveries made IN AMERICA and the discoveries made by AMERICANS are two big differences.
  45. therapist
    0
    18 June 2014 21: 42
    He writes: Mankind did not fly further than the Moon. And whoever flew to the Moon does not speak. Apparently he knows something that we don’t know. And we know that the Americans did not fly to the Moon. They didn’t move along the Moon like on ropes .Shadows are not lunar, but terrestrial. And fire suits, but not for overcoming the Earth’s magnetic belt. And did anyone begin to fall on the Life Support Container on the Moon, and they kind of joked there.
    1. -2
      6 July 2014 14: 17
      You, my friend, with this idle talk like a fool with lightning.
      They were on the moon. Read and watch an interview with Soviet scientists and cosmonauts of that time who worked on the same topic + a clear rationale for those strongly "smart" questions about ropes, etc.
  46. -1
    18 June 2014 23: 35
    The United States has very prestigious universities, etc., yes they are masters of all sorts of things like interstellar flights and cutting a bobble, although their literature is very difficult to read, what kind of education they can have if the book "War and Peace" takes up much 28 pages? and where does the mind and logic come from !? these are the ones who will say that everyone and everything will be killed.
    Although there is a real prospect, to create a ship in Hollywood and launch it for everyone, so drive on their ears as they do well.
    1. +3
      14 July 2014 23: 48
      Quote: Fantazer911
      USA has very prestigious universities
      And who is this rating? They themselves. If they were so cool, they would have made discoveries themselves, and not bought up brains from around the world.

      Quote: Fantazer911
      Although there is a real prospect of creating a ship in Hollywood and launching it for everyone,
      Well, they have no experience in this. And how to hang noodles on the ears, they themselves showed in "Capricorn-1". And what can they do to keep the secret.
  47. Dracula
    +1
    18 June 2014 23: 41
    Near the scientific * snowstorm * By the way I had a similar case, eating something wrong, I developed a speed close to the light speed, on the way home. belay
  48. +1
    19 June 2014 01: 29
    Well, why. Let them do it. Indeed, it is necessary to develop.
  49. 0
    19 June 2014 04: 34
    without having mastered the hot plasma immediately climb into such areas? Why .. Although .. If only the guys funded! Billions per 200 evergreens. The indicated starship-money-rafter all the same, cannot take off from the Earth. They will collect something in space. Flag in hand.
  50. +2
    19 June 2014 06: 14
    It is planned to influence time and space with the help of very strong electrostatic fields. Currently, scientists measure the degree of deformation of the space-time continuum during experiments using a laser interferometer. Their main task in the near future is the development in the laboratory of a microscopic “bubble”. In the future, scientists are going to use the dark energy of the Universe as the energy used to manipulate space.


    What nonsense ...
    I will put together such a "project" on my knee in 10 minutes: we take the graviplasma core and put it into resonance with the pulsation of relict hydrogen. On the crest of the generated gravitational wave, the ship will easily overcome the speed of light, and distant golaktegs will fall at our feet.

    Hey, why is NASA still not giving me a grant?
    1. +2
      14 July 2014 23: 52
      Respected psiho117, in your wonderful project, there is one significant drawback: as a clutch with a torsion field, a spaceship needs a gravitap. Well, after that - good luck.
  51. -4
    19 June 2014 06: 25
    They will definitely do it, humanity will step towards the stars.
  52. +1
    19 June 2014 06: 36
    Fantastic is wonderful! We need to give hope and make us dream, so that the cream of technology and greater efficiency can be skimmed from the individual based on people’s enthusiasm. Although... To be honest, all these intergalactic flights, Jedi, avatars, etc., etc. are a reflection of the new world religion of the New Age. It beckons, intoxicates, and the goal is pseudo-scientific occultism. And as for technology. I am surprised by the desire to send a person to somewhere far away on who knows what. What kind of sadism! Even dogs were the first to be sent into space. And with the current level of technology, you can get by with a robot. Pros: No need for a life support system, minimal weight and dimensions. The depths of the ocean have long been explored not by bulky and potentially dangerous bathyscaphes, but by miniature robots...
  53. +1
    19 June 2014 07: 16
    Giga-Mega super F-35, improved version.
  54. 0
    19 June 2014 07: 24
    Fantastic is wonderful! We need to give hope and make us dream, so that the cream of technology and greater efficiency can be skimmed from the individual based on people’s enthusiasm. Although... To be honest, all these intergalactic flights, Jedi, avatars, etc., etc. are a reflection of the new world religion of the New Age. It beckons, intoxicates, and the goal is pseudo-scientific occultism. And as for technology. I am surprised by the desire to send a person to somewhere far away on who knows what. What kind of sadism! Even dogs were the first to be sent into space. And with the current level of technology, you can get by with a robot. Pros: No need for a life support system, minimal weight and dimensions. The depths of the ocean have long been explored not by bulky and potentially dangerous bathyscaphes, but by miniature robots...
  55. +1
    19 June 2014 07: 24
    Fantastic is wonderful! We need to give hope and make us dream, so that the cream of technology and greater efficiency can be skimmed from the individual based on people’s enthusiasm. Although... To be honest, all these intergalactic flights, Jedi, avatars, etc., etc. are a reflection of the new world religion of the New Age. It beckons, intoxicates, and the goal is pseudo-scientific occultism. And as for technology. I am surprised by the desire to send a person to somewhere far away on who knows what. What kind of sadism! Even dogs were the first to be sent into space. And with the current level of technology, you can get by with a robot. Pros: No need for a life support system, minimal weight and dimensions. The depths of the ocean have long been explored not by bulky and potentially dangerous bathyscaphes, but by miniature robots...
  56. +2
    19 June 2014 07: 26
    a series of regular comics from AI
  57. Alex 1977
    +3
    19 June 2014 07: 59
    ...According to the presented concept, the space behind the starship will expand at a rapid speed, pushing the ship forward in a straight line. Using this method of moving through space, it will be possible to get to Alpha Centauri in just 14 days...

    A LITTLE BIT LATER...
    -On the fourth planet of the Alpha Centauri system, huge oil reserves and aborigines were discovered.
    -A representative of the Alpha Centauri Power Cube stated that his system was not interested in switching to the use of the US dollar as the main interstellar currency. We intend to use barter transactions, he said.
    -The US government expresses its concern about the violation of human rights on the fourth planet Alpha Centauri.
    -A representative of the Alpha Centauri Power Cube arrived on Earth to meet with Russian President Vladimir Putin. The meeting took place in a working, friendly atmosphere.
    -The US State Department declares that there are chemical weapons on the quadruple planet.
    -The Alpha Centauri government expresses interest in upgrading its anti-space defense system with Russian air defense systems.
    -The US State Department states that we have information about the involvement of Alpha Centauri in the terrorist attacks of September 6 and the training of al-Qaeda militants.
    -Alpha Centauri expresses interest in joining the Customs Union.
    -Psaki states: The State Department is concerned about the violation of the rights of sexual minorities on Alpha Centauri.
    Are they asexual and reproduce by division?
    “I’ll check this in my office,” she said...
    Продолжение следует ...
    1. anomalocaris
      +1
      21 June 2014 18: 53
      - Tell me, does intelligent life exist in the Universe?
      - Of course.
      “Then why haven’t they made contact with humanity yet?”
      - Because they are reasonable...
      1. +2
        21 June 2014 20: 11
        Quote: Alexey 1977
        A LITTLE BIT LATER...

        Bull's-eye!
  58. +4
    21 June 2014 22: 58
    I have never read more scientific nonsense on this resource... It looks like the site is descending into the abyss of palmistry and metaphysics... It’s good that at least the readers (though only half) saw through and appreciated this nonsense...
    1. +2
      6 July 2014 14: 28
      Why - such good nonsense. Reference. For a test check of the operation of a stupid tester of some kind, it’s fine.
  59. portoc65
    0
    22 June 2014 19: 07
    Quote: I think so
    I have never read more scientific nonsense on this resource... It looks like the site is descending into the abyss of palmistry and metaphysics... It’s good that at least the readers (though only half) saw through and appreciated this nonsense...

    In the East they say that fantasy is an internal reality - nothing is taken from nothing... any internal reality can manifest itself in material reality.
    1. 0
      6 July 2014 14: 24
      You can answer anything with such verbiage.

      any inner reality can manifest itself in material reality

      Unless during the process of defecation. It is quite possible to talk about specific things in such phrases in the absence of a concept in the subject of discussion.
  60. 0
    6 July 2014 14: 39
    According to the artist, it took him a NASA physicist to work on the graphical embodiment of his ideas. 3 month.

    Modeling + textures/materials - for a week at most, without straining too much. I'll work hard - 3 days. You can then spend another day on visualization, adding standard effects (which we observe) and post-processing in general.
    In short, I don’t know what this pepper was doing there for 3 months.
    1. Kir
      0
      6 July 2014 16: 53
      Or maybe he was involved in the interior decoration!!!, but visualization is lame in his mind, it’s enough to look at pictures of real objects - satellites, etc., to understand what reflexes are there!!! In general, submit it for examination to the RENDER.RU website, which is specialized, with the relevant questions.
  61. 0
    4 September 2014 19: 47
    Are such developments underway here?
  62. 0
    2 October 2014 16: 06
    As far as I remember, Einstein himself operated with the speed of light squared. so, no one has yet proven that there is no speed greater than the speed of light, but no one has refuted it either! Another question is vacuum, although it is considered empty space, there is matter there, and hydrogen is present, albeit in tiny volumes, what will happen to a ship that approaches a speed close to the speed of light, we are not going beyond the speed of light yet, all the trash. present in space, at such speeds, can be regarded as a projectile fired at a sheet of paper, that is, the ship will simply be destroyed. So, the pictures are certainly beautiful, and the discussions about the curvature and deformation of space and time are interesting. but from reality. are still far away, for the reason that it is still necessary to create a gravitational protective field. capable of either throwing space debris and meteorites aside, or burning them! Otherwise, you may not be able to fly further than the asteroid belt.
  63. 0
    29 January 2016 18: 22
    And what I like is nails and a hammer in their hands
    good