Zampoliths, political instructors, and still-commissioners
Title by author unknown. However, on the Internet in various forums, this topic rises constantly and is discussed with incredible fervor. Apparently, very sad! Let's turn to some facts and analyze what the fuss is about. Commissioners will not touch, and turn to the newest stories. Until September 1991, everything was clear, the political officer is the political officer. But after ... Instead of the political officer, an assistant commander for educational work was introduced. And since 1992, the professional training of teachers in military schools has ceased.
It can be stated that the system of education of military personnel was destroyed. However, everything is much deeper. For some reason, the loss of hazing has been associated with the loss of the institute of political workers in the nineties. It seems that this is a controversial thesis. And until the nineties there was hazing. It’s just that the media had no opportunity to discuss this issue. The concept of the Sacred Duty of serving the Fatherland was practically eroded. The main merit of young people now is to “hang out” from the army. And the army slowly began to degrade.
Only after 10 years, in 2002, a mistake was recognized, and the specialty “officer-educator” was introduced in military universities.
Among the issues discussed in society are:
- who goes to political schools? Fans or prominent youth representatives?
Officers have an opinion that political workers have created their own clan and constantly replenish it at the expense of graduates of schools. Lord officers! And remember - what did you know about the army, about the statutes, about the political work, when the green entrants passed entrance exams in the camps. Knew units. They knew those who had the opportunity to get this knowledge by inheritance. And that! This theoretical knowledge did not allow to have a complete picture of the future. Therefore, it can be argued that just young people, not fans and not outstanding representatives, went to the political departments of the schools. Just those who have heard something, and maybe the competition was less. But you never know for what reason.
And the rest of the experience was obtained and obtained, as in the officers of command and engineering specialties, directly in the process of performing functional duties. Next to experienced officers. It was in communication with experienced officers that there were and still are imbalances in the understanding of reality.
Have you personally met worthy people among political officers/educators?
Until now, there is talk among the officers-commanders that the political leaders did not do anything and do not do it. That in the military do not understand anything. In the Strategic Missile Forces, the political officer of the missile regiment must pass an exam for admission to independent duty and take over the database with the first combat crew number. In the air defense the same picture. Yes, and in the other kinds of troops the same. How are these facts?
Here is what officer S.Ivannikov writes: “Yes, my specialty is the deputy commander of a separate radar company for educational work, and according to the combat schedule, all the officers-tutors, as well as I, occupied ANY combat post that needed to be filled. I can still work, for example, as an IKO operator on 19-6. ”.
Or here's the guard writes private M .: “I don’t remember any offensive nicknames about our politician. An adult, looks are by no means heroic, just slightly below average height. I never "got" us. I checked the results of the year and easily ran 10km with us, although I could not run, not that company officers, platoon platters — they never ran with us, they always did their own work. ”.
political officers wear uniforms, shoulder straps, but what is their role, responsibility, conscience, honesty?
Writes graduate of the WPA them. V.I. Lenin, officer Petros Nersesyan: “Where, at the head of the unit, the connection was an intelligent, educated commander, there the deputy commander correctly found his place. And the fact that disgraceful officers met among political workers, since political workers did not fall from the moon. They are from our native society with all the vices. However, as the commanders, and the police. I consider changing the status of political politicians to be the deepest mistake. It was necessary to fundamentally reform this institution, but not to break everything and everything. Happy anniversary of the WPA, dear colleagues. I have the honor. One cannot but agree with him.
Or here's another. Already a young officer, A. Terebinov, writes: “The commander makes him do, and the commander explains to the soldier why this is necessary. If the commander can not force - bad. If a person does not understand why he is doing something - also not better. Commander will always be. And who will explain to people the need to properly and honestly fulfill their duty? ”. Isn't it true! And this is the officer of the new generation. It is good that among young officers there are responsible people.
Here is a statement by another officer: “And there were conscientious pahari political workers, who, not sparing their stomachs, fulfilled these duties. But .... it was not those who, according to the letter of the statutory duties of the political leader "directed, strengthened, paid attention and intensified" and so on, but those who performed these duties according to the principle "do as I" enjoyed respect. And if 100% political workers served according to this principle, the institute of political agencies would not collapse overnight because of its uselessness at the beginning of 90, since it would be needed ... ". And this statement has the right to exist.
But the opinion of the head of the political department of the anti-aircraft missile regiment of the air defense forces, a graduate of the WPA them. V.Lenin Matveychuk Valeriy: “Today, the Armed Forces do not need an institute of task guards, secretly under the engineers of soldiers and officers' souls.
But real engineers of human souls oh how needed and this role will be successfully performed by representatives of religious denominations. ”
General statements of participants in disputes on the subject of the article - offended people are speaking on both sides. The author of these lines also had a negative experience of communication with political workers at the level of the deputy head of the political department. However, this fact does not give the right to indiscriminately transfer negative experience to all political workers. As well as among commanders and engineers, among political workers there were, are and will be different people, the flesh of flesh is a product of society. Society. Here is the basis.
Information