Military Review

Jordan builds fourth generation tank

10
Jordan builds fourth generation tank
While the leading tank-building powers are thinking and wondering if they need or do not need a fourth-generation tank, this question can be taken off the ground by a small and not tank-building country - Jordan. A tank with an uninhabited combat module instead of a tower has already been built and is being tested in this country. It is these modules that are the main feature tanks fourth generation.

It is not strange, despite the revolutionary this news, it is discussed rather sluggishly. This is due to the fact that there is practically no information on this machine. Apparently, it is classified. It is only known that this is a joint development of Jordanians and South Africans.

This combat module has so far been developed for the bases of the British tanks Chieftain and Challenger. In general, this is not surprising. Since both South Africa and Jordan in the past were focused on the purchase of British tanks.

The concept of a tower with a small front area has attracted the attention of tank designers for many years. It provides a significant reduction in the size of the target, which tanks represent for weapons the enemy, and, consequently, the probability of hitting, especially when they occupy defensive positions - “tank in a trench” behind the crests of hills or other terrain objects. Moreover, it forces all crew members to be placed in the hull, where, being lower in the tank, they will be safer.

The advantages of the towers with a small area of ​​the front are divided with the advantages of a remote installation of the gun on the carriage. They should not be confused with the latter, which they excel in other ways, including a lower silhouette, a better ballistic form and a smaller reflective surface.



The name of the tank I could not find. But the combat module on it has a name - “Falcon” (Falcon). Perhaps the same name will receive the tank itself. The development of this combat module was supported personally by the King of Jordan Abdula II.

Major work was carried out by the King Abdullah II Design and Development Bureau (KADDB) in Jordan in collaboration with a number of South African and other firms. The KADDB Bureau was established in August 1999 to provide the Jordanian Armed Forces with scientific and technical services and, in the long term, to carry out R & D, which will help organize the industry in Jordan. The main collaborator in the design of the Falcon tower was the Bureau of Mechanology Design Bureau (MDB), based in Pretoria, whose knowledge and experience were gained in the creation of South African armored vehicles. The MDB was responsible, among other things, for the structural and mechanical design of the tower. His participation, together with the participation of other South African firms, is currently part of the Project Merlin program (Jordan and South Africa’s military industry cooperation). However, the main role in the development of the Falcon tower was played by Swiss and British firms. One of the main goals in the development of the Falcon tower was to increase the firepower of the tank army fleet of Jordan, which has four main types of tanks. The oldest of these is the Tariq tank, a significantly upgraded British-made Centurion tank, armed with an 105-mm L7 rifled gun. The second is the US M60X3 tank, armed with the US105 US 68-mm gun, a variant of the British L7 gun. The third type is the Khalid tank, a modification of the British “Chieftain” tank with a more powerful propulsion unit, armed, like the Chieftain tank, with an 120-mm L11 rifled gun. The fourth and most modern type is the Al Hussein tank, a former British ground forces Challenger-1 tank, similar to the Khalid tank, with the exception of the additional special Chobham armor and hydropneumatic suspension.



The Falcon combat module is equipped with an 120-mm smoothbore gun (CTG) capable of firing the same ammunition used by modern Western tanks, including M1 tanks in the Egyptian, Kuwaiti and Saudi troops and Leclerc tanks used by the United Arab Emirates.

This gun was developed in Switzerland by the company RUAG Land Systems. And in the opinion of many, it is this gun that is the most promising among other guns of 120 mm caliber. In particular, the CTG gun uses steel of significantly higher strength than its competitors.



This confirms the ultimate tensile stress of its steel, constituting 1300 MPa, compared to 1030 MPa steel used to produce widely accepted 120-mm smoothbore guns from Rheinmetall and 850 MPa steel used in the previous generation L7 tank guns.

As a result of the improved design, the mass and dimensions of the 120-mm CTG cannon have become not much more than the mass and dimensions of the 105-mm L7 cannons and are much smaller than those of the Rheinmetall company. Thanks to this, the CTG cannon fully satisfies all the requirements for replacing 120-mm cannons on old tanks. In the first place, it is going to be used in the modernization of the Pz105 Swiss tanks, as well it is planned to be installed on the M68 and M68A60 American tanks.



But back to our tank. His crew has a 2 man. Judging by triplexes, aiming and observation devices, the commander with the gunner is on the right - left of the gun in the hull. Those. the crew is, in fact, under the tower. The loading mechanism is located in the aft niche of the tower. In my opinion, this is a very good solution for the survival of the crew in case of detonation of ammunition. The ammunition should detonate over the crew members, thus leaving them intact (of course, as far as possible with such a powerful explosion).



Actually, that's all that is known for this car. Since the machine is experienced, it will surely be its further refinement. At least, for the emergence of anti-aircraft machine gun or some other anti-aircraft systems, I do not see any obstacles.



By the way, in the last photo, in my opinion, is the tank depicted in South African camouflage? And this is the only photo of the combat module Falcon based on Chiefen. On all other photos it is installed on the Challenger.
Originator:
http://alternathistory.org.ua
10 comments
Ad

Subscribe to our Telegram channel, regularly additional information about the special operation in Ukraine, a large amount of information, videos, something that does not fall on the site: https://t.me/topwar_official

Information
Dear reader, to leave comments on the publication, you must sign in.
  1. Joker
    Joker April 12 2011 10: 23
    +2
    But back to our tank. The crew has 2 people. - apparently still 3, i.e. reduced by 1 person due to the exclusion of the loader.

    The loading mechanism is located in the aft niche of the tower. In my opinion, this is a very good solution for the survival of the crew in case of ammunition undermining. The ammunition should detonate above the head of the crew members, leaving them thus unharmed (naturally, as much as possible with such a powerful explosion). - the location of the loading automatic machine in the aft niche of the tower does not mean the placement of the ammunition there. There is too little space in the tower to accommodate full ammunition, respectively, ammunition in the hull.

    This is just a combat module for upgrading obsolete tanks.

    Plus - a smaller frontal projection.

    Cons offhand:
    - with this scheme, there is no possibility of serious lateral armor (on the right and left of the turret crew hatches, overall increase in armor is not possible, because of the hatches, the installation of dynamic protection is doubtful).
    - the frontal shelling sector (plus or minus 30 degrees) does not provide a decent reservation.
    - one of the crew members at side fire when leaving the car will be very good, it will be covered by a tower, but the second is very bad, he will need to climb over the tower.
    - not provided with a circular overview of the commander and gunner.

    IMHO or completely separate the crew, according to the type of object 195, or put a full-fledged tower. I repeat, this is not a tank, this is a combat module for modernization, and not the fact that he will find customers.
  2. unit669
    unit669 April 12 2011 11: 01
    0
    "The advantages of turrets with a small front area are shared with the advantages of an external gun mount on a carriage. They should not be confused with the latter, which they are superior in other respects, including a lower silhouette, better ballistic shape and less reflective surface."
    I do not see in this particular case with this Jordanian "miracle" of a "lower silhouette and less reflective power". Not at all. In the lateral projection, this "module" looks like a completely full-fledged tower. Plus, add to this the very platform of the tank based on not the most the world's lowest tanks "Challenger" or "Chieftain". So there is no smell of "low silhouette" here.
  3. Escander
    Escander April 12 2011 11: 24
    0
    Pretty controversial pipilaz.
    The Anglo-Saxons decided at the expense of others to try out a new concept.
  4. datur
    datur April 12 2011 13: 21
    0
    the Arabs have their own pride.
  5. figwam
    figwam April 12 2011 15: 41
    0
    With modern anti-tank guided missiles that hit the target vertically, bypassing obstacles, the silhouette of the tank probably no longer plays an important role.
  6. mishan
    mishan April 13 2011 17: 11
    +1
    Wow colossus !! there are people in the first photo, look at the dimensions. I wonder what kind of engine is needed there to provide mobility to this miracle wedge? And our tanks FLY))))
  7. Bad_gr
    Bad_gr 14 January 2012 12: 07
    0
    We have the same approach implemented at the facility 640 (Omsk). But the ammunition is all behind the tower (removable module), the crew on the battlefield sits below the shoulder of the tower. The tower has protection against defeat from above.
    In my opinion, ours is more interesting.
    1. Bad_gr
      Bad_gr 14 January 2012 15: 02
      0
      Rear view, the module with ammunition is quite impressive in size:
  8. ksandr45
    ksandr45 29 November 2012 12: 24
    0
    as for me, they will make fittings, put a similar bath, there will be norms.
  9. svp67
    svp67 19 May 2013 15: 50
    0
    If everything is true, then the crew - the commander and the gunner are in the reclining tank and the driver will not have access to the fighting compartment. Well, this option, provided it is brought up, is not a bad way to upgrade old tanks, since the tank chassis has already been tested, only the warhead is changing ...
  10. TeR
    TeR 18 January 2015 13: 37
    0
    This article is dated April 12, 2011, well, it was online since 21.09.2012/XNUMX/XNUMX:
    http://3mv.ru/publ/tariq_falcon_1_iordano_juzhnoafrikanskij_opytnyj_tank_s_neobi
    taemoj_bashennoj_chastju / 1-1-0-11656
    About the same. A couple of photos have been added. Although they said what is called - TARIQ AB9C4.
    However, there was no mention of mass production.