The masters of the West are building a non-slave, caste civilization. Higher castes will have the “technology of the gods”, will extend their lives for several hundred years, will receive enhanced intellectual and physical capabilities (the introduction of exoskeletons). The main part of the population of the planet should become “two-legged tools”, fully controlled by the “owners”. This requires the degradation of the creative, spiritual, intellectual and physical potential of people. This should reduce the possibility of successful resistance to the architects of the New World Order to zero. Compared with the degraded humanity, the owners of the planet will look like “gods”.
All other related factors, such as gain on the degradation, artificial needs of mankind, are secondary. They proceed from the main goal - the New World Order, totalitarian, caste and non-slave society. Humanity must come to this society through a chain of local and regional conflicts that merge into a global confrontation. War, famine, epidemics, genocide, the new Great Migration of Nations must destroy the old world, crush the old civilizations-worlds. The present time is the clearing of the "field."
Boris Olshansky. Great Russia
The world crisis, which, like a nested doll, contains several crises at once - the western (European) civilization, capitalism, Christianity and Islam, the white race, the human race and the biosphere, raises the question of survival for Russia. Will Russia survive this storm? What type of society will win in the future? At the expense of whom and the benefit of whom will the matrix be “overloaded”? Will Russia be able to offer the world its globalization project and become the spiritual and intellectual leader of the planet?
The current situation is complicated. Russia, like the entire planet, is at the turning point. Russia and Ukraine can wait either for the collapse into smaller state formations, which will gradually be absorbed by Western, Islamic and Chinese projects, with gradual ousting from stories rut super-ethnos, which will become a “biological material” strengthening other people's projects, or a rigid left-wing (non-Stalinist) dictatorship. Dictatorship is needed to mobilize society and Russian civilization in the face of the threat of death and complete disappearance from the face of the planet, to respond to external and internal challenges, and a qualitative leap into the future. The dictatorship will be based on social justice and will unite the Russian Federation, Ukraine, Belarus, Transnistria, Kazakhstan and Armenia. It is possible that if the NATO bridgehead is to be eliminated, the Baltic States will also be returned. One way or another, Great Russia will be forced to put Central Asian republics under its control. Otherwise, the flow of Islamists, drugs and illegal migrants will not stop.
Russia has no strategic allies on the planet, only enemies and competitors, so you can only rely on yourself. That does not exclude the possibility of a temporary union, even with the United States. The question of the internal unity and solidity of the people becomes the most important. And for this, a single ideology is necessary, and it does not make sense to continue the churching of the population within the framework of the Orthodox Church and traditional Islam: the project “Russian Empire - 2” is doomed to failure in advance. With blatant social stratification and the presence of the oligarchy and the comprador bourgeoisie, profiting from resources and enterprises belonging to the people, state patriotism has no chance of success. It is necessary not only an ideology that will unite the people, but also a political, informational, and in some cases physical, cleansing of the “fifth column”. The "fifth column" includes liberals, national separatists, radical Islamists, ethnocracy, oligarchs and organized crime, including ethnic ones.
The situation is alarming, despite some foreign policy successes of the year 2013 and the continuation of the course for the rearmament of the army. Alas, Russia's unconditional success in foreign policy and the restoration of the Armed Forces is leveled by the threatening situation in the economy: even the government has to admit this. It should be noted and failure in the leading areas of domestic policy. Inside the country a whole range of problems: from corruption and the decline in the quality of the work of the administrative apparatus to the absence of conceptual ideas; from the liberal threat to the spread of radical Islam throughout the country, including the Russian environment.
In addition, foreign policy success is not only a victory for Moscow, but also the withdrawal of the United States from the Near and Middle East. Washington is regrouping forces, focusing on the most dangerous direction for it - the Asia-Pacific region. The United States simply freed a niche that we have filled. It is also filled by regional powers: Iran, Turkey and Saudi Arabia, some EU countries. So, France is actively behaving in Africa and is trying to grab some of the "pie" in the Arab world. In particular, against the background of the weakening of the American positions in the Persian Gulf, French politicians are trying to sell more weapons Arab monarchies. 29 December 2013, an announcement appeared that Saudi Arabia would buy French weapons worth 3 billion US dollars to equip the Lebanese army, which is fighting against Hezbollah. This movement fights on the side of Damascus against the Syrian armed gangs and is supported by Tehran, the enemy of the Saudis. In addition, the French are hoping to snatch a contract for the supply of six modern frigates and 5-6 submarines worth about 14 billion dollars, as well as the delivery of air defense systems worth over 2,7 billion from the Saudis. Dassault Aviation is making a lot of efforts to sell Rafale fighter jets worth 10 billion dollars to the UAE.
Apparently, Russia will continue to be able to strengthen its position in the world. It is necessary for Syria, Israel, Egypt, Iran and even Saudi Arabia. The positions of Russia and in the Asia-Pacific region will be restored. Here Russia is needed as the main players - the United States and China, and regional - Japan, the DPRK, South Korea and Vietnam. With the degradation of almost all the post-Soviet republics, Russia will strengthen its position in this direction. Ukraine without Russia will face further degradation and the prospect of civil war and disintegration. Under the threat of a sharp deterioration in the situation are the republics of Central Asia.
But with excellent opportunities in foreign policy, which open up during the global turmoil, the situation inside the country looks extremely bad. And the recent terrorist attacks in Volgograd, murders in the Stavropol region, not to mention the manifestations of Wahhabism and ethno-separatism in Tatarstan, highlight a huge number of problems. The experience of all sorts of "color" revolutions and coups, the "Arab spring" shows that state collapse technologies are honed to automatism. If the state does not solve the problem, they are used against it. The global crisis will kill and destroy the weak players. The stronger the crisis develops, the more willing will be to use against Russia all the available technologies of information warfare, dismantling and the collapse of statehood.
Comprador oligarchic capitalism is a deadly virus that eats away at a country. It is the basis of a significant part of the crisis. The plan of the “energy superpower” (in fact, the raw materials appendage of the West and the East) is undoubtedly a strategic mistake of Vladimir Putin and his team. The rate on mono-economics, i.e., exclusively on those industries that quickly generate profits, was initially a failure. This strategy made Russia dependent on the world situation. What will happen if the owners of the western project collapse energy prices? And they can do it - it is known from the sad experience of the USSR. The socioeconomic crisis with the threat of further privatization and deindustrialization will deal a strong blow to the safe harbor concept ...
There is very little time left. Inside the country, a “revolutionary situation” is ripening. Perhaps a combination of liberal, Russian national and "foreign-Islamist" protest. The first shoots of political Islam appeared. Radical Islam acquired a new and very dangerous (terrible) dimension - now Russian Wahhabis are fighting against Russia. The absence of a state ideology that unites Russian, Caucasian and Tatar youth, along with the lack of social justice in Russia, is forcing young people to increasingly turn their eyes to radical Islam, which promises to build a just society. The dynamics of the conversion of young Slavs to radical Islam are just scary. And this is against the background of a difficult migration situation and the national issue, when Russians feel like guests in their homeland! ..
The ideological emptiness is filled with the values of the golden calf and the ideology of the caliphate. Ceremonial religious cults - Christianity and traditional Islam - are incapable of competing with radical Islam and the values of a consumer society. The emphasis on the clericalization of society, the revival of the positions of the Orthodox Church and traditional Islam, which, together with official patriotism, were attempted to replace the state ideology, failed. It only got worse. There was an archaization of the part of society that believes the priests, mullahs, shamans and magicians more than science. Moreover, the strengthening of the positions of traditional Islam has led to the strengthening of the radical, which is actively suppressing the traditional. Moreover, the strengthening of the Christian church, which wants to return its position in the army, the school and in general in society (of course, with a material income), irritates a significant part of society, which is oriented towards the secular character of the state. Traditional religions have no chance to stop the onset of Western values and values of the Islamic project.
The result is a wild kaleidoscope in the heads. Bikers (by the way, a subculture of purely Western origin), like the members of the Night Wolves club, defend Orthodox and traditional values. In the minds of people - a wild mix. It is impossible to build anything on such an ideological basis. Such a foundation only leads to destruction, which we see.
Police activities, the strengthening of which we observe in connection with the approach of the Olympics, are not able to solve the problem. They can only freeze the situation, for some time to contain a wave of catastrophic changes. They are needed - but only as a manifestation of a clear concept of the development of the country and the state ideology of Russia.
To get Russia out of the impasse, a dictatorship is needed. We need ideology and a mobilization plan. The mobilization program should be based on social justice, be alternative to that liberal program that led the world and Russia into a civilizational dead end. And this program must be implemented right now, because Russia's situation resembles the position of the Russian Empire at the beginning of the First World War or the position of the USSR towards the beginning of the 1930-ies. Only the mobilization of the economy, the restoration of a single ideology that will unite the people into a single whole, can save Russia from the impending storm.
Boris Olshansky. Ivan the widow's son.
So that there are no unsubstantiated accusations in promoting the idea of “Vladimir Putin - to dictators (autocrats)”, I would say that I don’t see the current guarantor in the role of such a leader. He is clearly a transitional figure. St. Petersburg's “liberal-intellectual upbringing" with the constant support of Stalin's accusations of "big terror", with respect to "victims of repression", with curtsies towards Yeltsin, Sakharov, Solzhenitsyn, Mandela and similar figures, with the refusal to revise the results of privatization - all this signs of Putin’s inability to take responsibility for breaking the conceptual, ideological, and financial-economic dependence of Russia from the West. Putin can say “thank you” for the fact that during his time Russia did not fall apart. But it is obvious: “the slave on galleys” is time to retire. Before that, he must leave a successor capable of tough decisions. Without this, Russia's survival will be in question.