Military Review

What ships did the Russian Navy receive in 2013?

78
So. If anyone remembers. In July, the site published an article photo-review What ships will receive the Russian Navy in 2013 year? The year is coming to an end. In this, I make another photo report on those ships. What our sailors got, and what they will get next year (backlog). So - let's go:


1. SSBN Ave. 955 “Alexander Nevsky” - displacement 17000т.

Admitted to the Navy 23 December 2013 of the year.



2. SSBN Ave. 955 “Vladimir Monomakh” - displacement 17000т.

Stay on duty in 2014 year. Currently undergoing sea trials in the White Sea.

What ships did the Russian Navy receive in 2013?


3. MTSAPL pr. 885 “Severodvinsk” - displacement 11800 t.

Will be part of fleet 30 December.



4. Corvette Ave 20380 "Boky" - displacement 2100 t.

Admitted to the Navy 16 in May 2013 of the year.



5. RTOs 21631 Ave. "Grad Sviyazhsk" - displacement 949t.

September 25 completed state ship tests. Until the end of 2013, they must be part of the Caspian Flotilla.



6. MRK pr. 21631 "Uglich" - displacement 949т.

Uglich in the second decade of December will go to sea for the last stage of state tests.
After the acts are signed and approved (until the end of 2013), the naval commander-in-chief will be included in the Caspian flotilla.



7. DKA pr. 21820 “Denis Davydov” - displacement 280т.

Launched 26 July 2013 of the year. It was moved to the Baltic. Other information has not yet found.



8. DKA Ave. 21820 “Ivan Kartsov” - displacement 280т.

Launched 30.09.13. Currently undergoing state tests.



9. Anti-sabotage boat project 21980 "Rook" (serial number 8002). - displacement 138т. (Standard)

Launched 24.06.13. In September, transferred to the Pacific Fleet.



10. Anti-diversion boat project 21980 "Rook" (serial number 984) - displacement 138t. (Standard)

Launched in April 2013, in August transferred to the Black Sea Fleet.



11. Anti-diversion boat project 21980 "Rook" (serial number 985) displacement 138т. (Standard)

In October, transferred to the Caspian Flotilla.



12, 13, 14. DKA pr. 11770 "D - ???" - displacement 99,7т.

There was information that in the first half of 2013, amphibious boats of the “Serna” project will be included in the Caspian flotilla.

That's where they went - no information. Probably taken quietly into the Caspian flotilla, as only found news for September 24 about what in Dagestan, exercises were held in which the landing force landed on boats of the “Dugong” and “Serna.

Auxiliary vessels for the Navy:

15. OIS pr. 22010 "Yantar" - displacement 5736т.

Passing trials. They promise to pass in 2014 year.



16. MGS pr. 19910 "Victor Faleev" - displacement 910т. (Standard)

He joined the Navy 28.01.13 of the year.



17. BGK Pr. 19920B "BGK-702" - displacement 320т.

He joined the Navy 23.12.13 of the year.



18. SB pr. 745MBS "Victor Konetsky" - displacement 1300т.

He joined the Navy 06.12.13 of the year.



19. SBS pr. 22870 “SB-45” - displacement 1200т. (Standard)

24 May 2013 at the Astrakhan Shipyard took place the launch of the vessel. Is being completed. Send promise in 2014 year.



20. MB pr. PE-65 "MB-92" - displacement of about 700.

Admitted to the Navy 13.09.13.



21. MB pr. PE-65 "MB-93" - displacement of about 700.

Admitted to the Navy 24.09.13.



22. MNS pr. SKPO-1000 "Umba" - displacement 2290t.

The ship is launched. Transfer in 2014 year.



23. MNS pr. SKPO-1000 "Pecha" - displacement 2290t.

The ship is launched. Transfer in 2014 year.



24. RB pr. 90600 "RB-392" - displacement 417т.


Admitted to the Navy 6 June 2013 of the year.



25. RB pr. 90600 "RB-398" - displacement 417т.

Admitted to the Navy 9 August 2013 of the year.



26. RB pr. 90600 "RB-399" - displacement 417т.

Admitted to the Navy 21 September 2013 of the year.



27. RB pr. 90600 "RB-400" - displacement 417т.

Admitted to the Navy 8 on November 2013 of the year.



28. RB pr. 90600 "RB-401" - displacement 417т.

Admitted to the Navy 23 December 2013 of the year.



29, 30. RB pr. 90600 “RB-402” and “RB-403” - displacement 417т.

Adopted in the Navy 17 August 2013 of the year.



31, 32. RB pr. 90600 “RB-404” and “RB-405” - displacement 417т.

Adopted in the Navy 24 August 2013 of the year.



33. The launch boat of the project 1388НЗ - displacement 500т.

23.12.13 continues to pass sea trials in Novorossiysk. In the near future will be transferred to the Black Sea Fleet.



34, 35, 36, 37 Diving boats of the project 14157 "RVK-764", "RVK-762", "RVK-767", "RVK-771" - displacement 118 each.



All four boats are launched and delivered to Novorossiysk. In the near future will be transferred to the Black Sea Fleet.

Author:
78 comments
Information
Dear reader, to leave comments on the publication, you must sign in.
  1. gispanec
    gispanec 27 December 2013 09: 35
    +13
    Thank you for the good photo material, but did Makhachkala also come in? ... no? ...
    1. Trailer
      27 December 2013 09: 42
      +8
      Quote: gispanec
      but it seems that Makhachkala has also entered? ... no? ...
      RTO "Makhachkala" was admitted to the Caspian Flotilla on December 4, 2012.
      1. gispanec
        gispanec 27 December 2013 10: 10
        +2
        Quote: Karavan
        December 4 2012 year.

        Thank you ... my forgot))
        1. Alexander Petrovich
          Alexander Petrovich 27 December 2013 11: 20
          +22
          It seems that we will be fighting in tugs. Thank you for the information and for the photo, I wish that in the new year in terms of quantity, now instead of tugs, corvettes and frigates are put on the site.
    2. The comment was deleted.
    3. klimpopov
      klimpopov 27 December 2013 10: 10
      +16
      Zelo good news!
    4. Civil
      Civil 27 December 2013 11: 42
      +6
      But the tugs in bulk, instead of privatized.
  2. Zheka Varangian
    Zheka Varangian 27 December 2013 09: 43
    +8
    Thanks to the author for the work done! Fighting is not enough.
    1. The comment was deleted.
    2. Trailer
      27 December 2013 10: 03
      +7
      3 nuclear submarine, corvette, 2 small missile ship, 3-4 anti-sabotage boats. Not bad for 1 year.
      1. Santa Fe
        Santa Fe 27 December 2013 20: 38
        +3
        Quote: Karavan
        3 nuclear submarine, corvette, 2 small missile ship, 3-4 anti-sabotage boats. Not bad for 1 year.

        Considering that the K-550 "A. Nevsky" has been in operation since 2004, and the K-560 "Severodvinsk" is already in 1993 ....

        It so happened that they would go into operation in 2013. Next year such a loaf is not expected
        1. Botanologist
          Botanologist 27 December 2013 21: 43
          -1
          Quote: SWEET_SIXTEEN
          Next year such a loaf is not expected


          11350 frigates and corvettes are expected. I think we’ll see the 3-4 of a ship of the 1 rank, otherwise it’s a bit small in the surface fleet, only corvettes.
          1. Santa Fe
            Santa Fe 27 December 2013 22: 14
            +4
            Quote: Botanologist
            11350 frigates expected

            Not one of them is even launched into the water,
            in the best case, they will complete the construction and transfer "Grigorovich" by 2016
            Quote: Botanologist
            I think that 3-4 of a ship of 1 rank will still be seen, but

            1 rank?
            1 rank - these are destroyers / cruisers under 10 thousand tons, submarines, UDC and other large ocean equipment
    3. Canep
      Canep 27 December 2013 10: 36
      +8
      Quote: Zheka Varangian
      ! Fighting is not enough.
      Without these tugboats, the operation of large warships will be impossible; forward support ships must be restored. What is being done.
      1. little man
        little man 27 December 2013 12: 05
        -5
        Quote: Canep
        Quote: Zheka Varangian
        ! Fighting is not enough.
        Without these tugboats, the operation of large warships will be impossible; forward support ships must be restored. What is being done.

        Warships, for that matter, can operate along the shore for hundreds or even thousands of kilometers. without any escort (remember the battleships of the Second World War), but about strategists there’s nothing to say. Anyway. Let’s observe proportions then.
        And now there is a dull assimilation of money. Type, and the total displacement, we still hoo!
        1. Fin
          Fin 27 December 2013 13: 36
          0
          Quote: man
          And now there is dumb assimilation of money. Type, and the total displacement, we still hoo!

          Have you flown from the moon? All that industry can do so far, anyway. Or is this news for you?
          1. little man
            little man 27 December 2013 16: 16
            -4
            I don’t understand the only thing - what prevents to revive the defense industry.
            There is only one answer - there is a systematic collapse of the country.
            I do not believe a bit that by 2020 the country will receive decent weapons.
            We will still look at the tugboats.
            PS Yes, I prosralipolymer smile
            1. chunga-changa
              chunga-changa 27 December 2013 22: 15
              +4
              Quote: man
              I don’t understand the only thing - what prevents to revive the defense industry.

              "Cadres are everything." Some cadres only want to steal, others do nothing, still others do nothing, others do poorly at the institute and cannot figure out how to solve the problem, the fifth are spies, the sixth are pests. In general, we all interfere with the revival of something there, because we do not care about some kind of military-industrial complex, we have our own problems, the main one is less money than we would like.
            2. Don
              Don 2 January 2014 15: 09
              +1
              Quote: man
              There is only one answer - there is a systematic collapse of the country.

              There is a systematic collapse of your brain if this is written. To you list what has arrived in the Air Force and Navy since 2011? And volumes are increasing.
            3. The comment was deleted.
  3. Nayhas
    Nayhas 27 December 2013 09: 43
    +10
    To paraphrase a cartoon boa constrictor: "And in tugs I am much more!"
    1. Trailer
      27 December 2013 09: 51
      +10
      Quote: Nayhas
      : "And in tugs I am much more!"
      But, without these tugboats, no ship will sail beyond the mooring wall.
      1. Nayhas
        Nayhas 27 December 2013 10: 56
        +7
        Quote: Karavan
        But, without these tugboats, no ship will sail beyond the mooring wall.

        Undoubtedly, it is impossible without support vessels, but somehow everyone is waiting for "something else" ...
    2. The comment was deleted.
  4. VohaAhov
    VohaAhov 27 December 2013 09: 47
    +12
    The review is very interesting, but there are a couple of points that need clarification.
    The article is called "What ships did the Russian Navy receive in 2013?" However, the article includes not only ships, but also ships of the auxiliary fleet. The article also includes ships and vessels that are under construction and were not included in the fleet in 2013. Forgotten, probably undeservedly, AICRSN "Yuri Dolgoruky", which raised the flag on 10.01.13.
    1. Trailer
      27 December 2013 09: 55
      +9
      Quote: VohaAhov
      There are a couple of points that need clarification.
      Hmm, I can agree with Yuri Dolgoruky. But, already on 8 of December 2013 of the year, the boat arrived at Sevmash to undergo repairs. As for the unfinished ships - I wanted to show the fate of all the ships, which, as I believed, should have been accepted into our Navy this year. The main and auxiliary vessels for the military.
      1. Sokol peruna
        Sokol peruna 27 December 2013 10: 14
        +1
        Trailer
        Hmm, I can agree with Yuri Dolgoruky.

        Well, you recklessly agreed. All the same, the ship is considered loyal to the fleet after the signing of the Acceptance Certificate, and as you know, it was signed on December 29.12.2012, XNUMX.
        P.S. Yes, and 21820 projects are now classified now as MDK.
    2. The comment was deleted.
  5. VohaAhov
    VohaAhov 27 December 2013 09: 49
    +4
    Quote: gispanec
    Thank you for the good photo material, but did Makhachkala also come in? ... no? ...

    "Makhachkala" joined the Russian Navy on 4.12.12. But she stayed in the Baltic to participate in the Moscow International Exhibition Center. Well, she came to the Caspian in 2013.
  6. ilya_oz
    ilya_oz 27 December 2013 09: 55
    +3
    Unfortunately, especially warships are not visible (So a pair of port pelvis and a submarine without missiles.
    1. The comment was deleted.
    2. Trailer
      27 December 2013 10: 02
      +4
      Quote: ilya_oz
      So a couple of port pelvis and a submarine without missiles.
      I saw these pelvis in action - graceful and powerful. As for nuclear submarines without missiles - tomorrow is war? I'm not writing about weapons, but about ships. And besides, as the comrade noted above, I missed the Yury Dolgoruky nuclear submarine. Let's add to this Nevsky and Severodvinsk - 3 nuclear submarines adopted in 1 year. Enough.
      1. vaddag1
        vaddag1 27 December 2013 11: 14
        +8
        "As for the nuclear submarine without missiles, is there a war tomorrow?" - this argument kills me, especially from people who have some knowledge on the issue. the army must always be in a state of "tomorrow war", otherwise it is not fucking to keep it constantly in readiness, and then when the time comes to collect, prepare, arm. the war is always unexpected (08.08.08. - it seems not serious, but the numbers like 11-12.08.08 could have exchanged nuclear strikes with the USA, purely hypothetically). The nuclear submarine is a weapon, and in this case it is a very important, expensive, BUT non-working weapon (ie the "front section" is bare). we just have to honestly admit that we have failed until we have coped with the task, we may not be able to cope (we will build new nuclear submarines, we will stuff these 100 cruise missiles each).
  7. borisjdin1957
    borisjdin1957 27 December 2013 09: 56
    +6
    from the Don.
    clearly, there are no ships with a displacement of 1000 or more tons! And this is not good!
    1. Trailer
      27 December 2013 10: 08
      +7
      Quote: borisjdin1957
      no ships with a displacement of 1000 and more than tons!
      Dozens are being built. Mistrals, nuclear submarines, frigates, corvettes, sea tugs, icebreakers, a bunch of tankers and bulk carriers. In addition, many rescue ships are laid down. This I am only for those who are definitely writing more than 1000 tons.
      1. Ptah
        Ptah 27 December 2013 12: 15
        +2
        Maybe this is a typo in "borisjdin195", and it meant "10 or more". It is with access to the OCEAN, that is, with greater autonomy.
        After all, harbor tugs (RB) are only for port waters, MRK pr. Buyan is more for "closed" seas.
        Still in doubt "Cutter connection project 1388NZ ".
        With such a displacement (500 tons) and a folding mast, it is apparently intended for passage under bridges (maybe for transferring from the Black Sea Fleet to the KF along the Volgo-Don ").
        Why is he on the rivers, where all the air is already "broken through" by the site dispatchers?
        There are still some "misunderstandings", but I will not talk about them, otherwise they will seem nit-picking.
        So that in the coming year, no less!
        1. donavi49
          donavi49 27 December 2013 12: 34
          +5
          Communication boat designed:
          Designed for transportation of people, communications operations, delivery of valuable or small goods, packages of documents and equipment.


          In fact, it is used as a transport for the headquarters of the fleet, for representative functions, the delivery of documents and other works. By the way, it is made on the basis of a dashboard.
          1. Ptah
            Ptah 27 December 2013 13: 01
            +1
            Here. Moreover, it does not have any "special design features" over other river vessels.
            I am not against the building, I wonder why it is on the list (MILITARY) next to the boats.
            After all, if you hypothetically imagine, in the event of hostilities on the seas, many thousands of "vessels", which are now used for entertainment purposes in all major cities of Russia located along the banks of rivers and lakes, not to mention the sea coasts, will cope with the functions. It is enough to collect and "put under the gun".
            1. donavi49
              donavi49 27 December 2013 13: 12
              +4
              Ah, everything is simple here. The ship is built on money under the state defense order, for the Russian Navy, it is operated only by the Russian Navy - therefore this is a full-fledged unit in this list.

              For example, a PSKR like Rubin and Svetlyak is building money from the FSB for money, but if something happens, it's a mob. reserve for the Navy. As well as the river fleet, for example, motor ships will not carry passengers, but soldiers / be mobile hospitals, etc. But all this is not worth writing here, as these ships are built on the money of the main customer and will be related to the Navy only if the mobilization plan is activated.

              By the way, for example, Sapphire, which is not even officially laid laughing .
              1. Ptah
                Ptah 27 December 2013 13: 28
                +1
                We are about the same thing, only in slightly different words.
                That each duralumin "Progress", dry cargo ship and three-deck "passenger" will SERVE is not disputed, because it should be so.
                Quote: donavi49
                The ship is built on money under the state defense order, for the Russian Navy

                Here it would be to "shake for the money", those who had "floating * ladovoz" displacement and comfort, unlike the same RB and "Sernam".
                Bought a yacht - unfasten the cost of 30% for the navy. He built a corvetic on his "earned by means of" - you can think of the name in honor of the "patron and altruist".
                How do you like this idea?
                1. Tatanka Yotanka
                  Tatanka Yotanka 27 December 2013 17: 49
                  +9
                  Quote: Ptah
                  He built a corvetic on his "earned by means of" - you can think of the name in honor of the "patron and altruist".
                  How do you like this idea?

                  For their affairs, there will be an excuse
                  Frigate - "Abramovich", corvette - "Deripaska"
                  For those who carry money over a hill
                  Submarine Offshore
                  One scuba dive is enough from state employees,
                  A missile cruiser, let it be the "Central Bank"
                  The ship is big, where is the airdrome
                  Let it be laid with the name "Gazprom"
                  Medvedev let him throw himself off - Lard Chervonchik
                  On a powerful, huge, landing - “iPhone”
                  Vladimir Putin was just lucky
                  With him, for the galley, you need a paddle
                  1. Ptah
                    Ptah 28 December 2013 00: 50
                    +2
                    Vladimir Putin was just lucky
                    With him, for the galley, you need a paddle

                    good Good poem! Absolutely the topic! It resembles Marshak or Mikhalkov in style.
                    When you publish your book, do not forget to spit out the copyright from me for a little denyushka for an idea.
                    Although not. Then with you a handful of nuts and bolts for the boat.
        2. borisjdin1957
          borisjdin1957 27 December 2013 13: 29
          0
          from the Don.
          Sure, a blotch!
        3. Santa Fe
          Santa Fe 27 December 2013 20: 41
          +2
          Quote: Ptah
          With such a displacement (500 tons) and a folding mast, it is apparently intended for passage under bridges (maybe for transferring from the Black Sea Fleet to the KF along the Volgo-Don ").
          Why is he on the rivers, where all the air is already "broken through" by the site dispatchers?

          Mastering the budget - we’ll come up with anything, just to not build large warships
    2. The comment was deleted.
    3. donavi49
      donavi49 27 December 2013 10: 32
      +6
      This year more 1k
      Boyky, Victor Konetsky, Victor Faleev.

      Plus VTR-79 - yes, the ship was actually handed over in the 2010 year, but in the first it was of rather low availability (the same crane was only operational at the end of the 2011-beginning of the 2012 year).

      Moreover, due to a number of design errors of Vympel Design Bureau, it has low stability. Therefore, despite the postscript of the Northern Fleet, it was not accepted by the fleet, it stood all the time in Lomonosovo and did not go out (there were thoughts, not to write off this). This year, the ship received a second life - it was repaired and refitted, transferred to the calm Caspian Sea, where it will work, including with the latest ships equipped with UKKS.


      Next year should:
      hand over the Resistant, hand over the frigate, hand over MB-11 and other large auxiliary.
    4. silver_roman
      silver_roman 27 December 2013 14: 33
      +2
      like Putin correctly said: before taking ships into operation, you first need to prepare the entire infrastructure, all the additions, and only then transfer the ship to the place of deployment. The same minesweepers (the need for 90-100 ships was declared) is necessary!
      GPV-2020 passed only 3 years. many ships were laid at the turn of the beginning of this program. So I think that in the next two years the fleet will receive a couple of dozen corvettes, frigates and MKR!
  8. erased
    erased 27 December 2013 10: 01
    +3
    Interesting data. But warships will not be enough. However, this is a land opinion. As for the submarines - do clubs seem to be standing on them? And missiles do not yet show a stable result during firing. Or are they already showing ?!
    1. govoruha-otrok
      govoruha-otrok 27 December 2013 10: 19
      +3
      it is not known what is with the Mace. it upsets
  9. Roman 1977
    Roman 1977 27 December 2013 10: 23
    +9
    Well, well sparsely: one SSBN (for the Pacific Fleet), one corvette of Project 1 (for the Baltic Fleet), three Project 20380 Grachonok (for the Black Sea Fleet, Pacific Fleet, KFL), one DKA of Project 3 Serna; 21980 diesel-electric submarine of project 1 "Kaluga" was repaired. Expected by the end of the year: 11770 MRK project 1, 877 DKA project 2 "Serna" (all for KFl), possibly 21631 MPLATRK project 2 "Ash" - "Severodvinsk" for the Northern Fleet, 11770 corvette of project 1 for the Baltic Fleet (possibly, most likely they will at the beginning of 855), 1 DSC "Denis Davydov" of project 20380 "Dugong" (on trials).
    Next year are expected:
    1 SSBN project 955 "Borey" - "Vladimir Monomakh" for the Pacific Fleet;
    1 UDC "Mistral" - "Vladivostok" for the Pacific Fleet (possibly, but most likely in 2015);
    3 diesel-electric submarines of project 636.3 for the Black Sea Fleet (the first of them "Novorossiysk" has already been launched);
    1 frigate of project 22350-long-suffering "Gorshkov" for the Northern Fleet, it is planned to bring to sea trials in January 2014:
    News
    13: 30 | 24 December 2013 Years, Tuesday
    The frigate Admiral Gorshkov will go to factory sea trials immediately after the installation of the A-192 gun mount
    TSAMTO, 24 December. The frigate of the 22350 project “Admiral of the Fleet of the Soviet Union Gorshkov”, being built at the Severnaya Verf, will go to factory sea trials in the Baltic Sea at the beginning of the 2014 year, immediately after the installation of the A-192 gun mount, RIA Novosti reports citing a source at the enterprise ...
    “The ship has long been“ in pairs ”, the whole problem is that the delivery of the 130-mm A-192 artillery mount from the Arsenal Design Bureau was delayed, without which it is impossible to carry out full-scale tests of the frigate in the Baltic, especially firing at the Baltic Fleet’s training grounds, - said the interlocutor of RIA Novosti.
    The agency’s source emphasized that as soon as the installation was delivered to the ship, Admiral Gorshkov would immediately go for complex tests.
    A representative of the St. Petersburg Arsenal Design Bureau told RIA Novosti that the A-192 gun mount for the frigate would be delivered to Severnaya Verf in the first days of the new year.

    http://armstrade.org/includes/periodics/news/2013/1224/133021912/detail.shtml

    1 more frigate of project 22350 "Admiral Kasatonov", for the Black Sea Fleet (possibly);
    3 frigates of project 11356 for the Black Sea Fleet (possibly), the first "Admiral Grigorovich" was launched in the fall and is scheduled for delivery in July 2014;
    1 corvette of project 20380 "Perfect" for the Pacific Fleet (possibly);
    1 BDK project 11711, another "sufferer" "Ivan Gren" (possibly, but according to the latest information, will be handed over to the fleet in 2015);
    The transfer of the large landing ship Ivan Gren to the Russian Navy is shifted to 2015 ... "Mooring tests are expected to begin in August - September 2014. And the transfer of the ship to the Navy is scheduled for 2015," he said Sergei Mikhailov, press secretary of the Baltic Shipyard Yantar, did not specify the reasons for the postponement. He noted that the large landing ship Ivan Gren is being completed on the water, at the quay wall of the Yantar shipyard.

    http://www.i-mash.ru/news/nov_otrasl/45839-flotu-pridetsja-podozhdat-bdk-ivan-gr
    en-eshhe-dva.html

    3 RTOs of the 21631 project for CFL;
    1 BTSC of the 12700 Alexandrite project;
    1 Project 21980 Grachonok project for the Pacific Fleet;
    3 PCs (2 projects 12150A "Mongoose" and 1 project 03160 "Raptor").
    1. Trailer
      27 December 2013 10: 26
      0
      Have you heard of the Ivan Gren large landing craft?
      1. donavi49
        donavi49 27 December 2013 11: 12
        +5
        Hear 2015. The fleet does not need a ship; it is not a priority, unlike 11356. And this is not so much the BDK as the VTR.

        Not only is there not enough hands on him, he is also dear, because the power one, for example DRX3700, is actually assembled for him. And the plant has just begun to ship it.
    2. The comment was deleted.
    3. Roman 1977
      Roman 1977 27 December 2013 11: 07
      +2
      For subsidiary plans for next year:
      BRZK project 18280 "Yuri Ivanov" (for the Pacific Fleet), launched on September 30.09.2013, XNUMX, being completed afloat;

      launching of the BRZK project 18280 "Yuri Ivanov"
      CASW of the 1388NZ project, launched on 20.06.2013 of the year, is being tested in Novorossiysk (possibly for the Black Sea Fleet);
      MTV (sea transport of weapons) project 20180TV "Akademik Kovalev";
      MTV project 20183TV "Akademik Aleksandrov";
      MT (marine tanker) of the 23130 project (for the Northern Fleet)

      R / V project 22010 "Yantar" (for the Baltic Fleet) was supposed to be delivered this year, but there is no data on the transfer to the fleet.
      Project 21300 rescue vessel "Yuri Belousov", launched on October 30.10.2012, XNUMX, for the Northern Fleet;

      SS "Yuri Ivanov" project 21300 at the wall of the "Admiralty shipyards"
      5 of diving boats of the 14157 project (1 for Pacific Fleet should have been delivered this year, there is no data on delivery);
      4 emergency rescue boats of the 23040 project (for the Black Sea Fleet) - launched;
      1 multifunctional rescue boat of the 23370 project (for BF), launched on 28.09.2013 of the year;
      4 MSNB project 03180 "Umba" "Pecha" - launched;
      3 work and crew boats of project 21770 "Katran" (for the Northern Fleet), 1-carrier SS "Igor Belousov", launched;
      1 logistic support vessel of project 23120 "Elbrus" (for Northern Fleet).
      1. Fin
        Fin 27 December 2013 13: 52
        +1
        Quote: Novel 1977
        BRZK project 18280 "Yuri Ivanov" (for Pacific Fleet),

        For the SF, the crew will go to the factory in early January.
    4. Hitrovan07
      Hitrovan07 27 December 2013 17: 02
      -1
      The launch of the ships in 2014 is impressive - we're waiting.
      1. Hitrovan07
        Hitrovan07 28 December 2013 19: 00
        -1
        the year didn’t indicate a bit, but how many minuses laughing
      2. Hitrovan07
        Hitrovan07 28 December 2013 19: 00
        0
        the year didn’t indicate a bit, but how many minuses laughing
    5. Hitrovan07
      Hitrovan07 27 December 2013 17: 02
      0
      The launch of the ships in 2014 is impressive - we're waiting.
      1. Hitrovan07
        Hitrovan07 28 December 2013 19: 01
        0
        hmm. how to do duplicates easily, but to delete is unrealistic.
      2. Hitrovan07
        Hitrovan07 28 December 2013 19: 01
        0
        hmm. how to do duplicates easily, but to delete is unrealistic.
    6. bddrus
      bddrus 29 December 2013 18: 30
      0
      Grogorovich lowered into the water? who and when? you kind of overclocked
  10. donavi49
    donavi49 27 December 2013 10: 26
    +7
    Invalid data for many indicators. All Wishlist and advances included, but what is really transferred no wink .

    For example:
    “RVK-764”, “RVK-762”, “RVK-767”, “RVK-771” - steam and GOSy are on the move next year.
    Pecha and Umba - what are they doing here? With the same success, you can write down Grena and Gorshkova, next year closer to autumn and not earlier (Pella has a low limit launch weight, so they were let down empty, so they will finish building according to 1,5 of the year).
    Denis Davydov and Kartsov will not be transmitted this year. Davydov is still not ready at all, but Kartseva, according to the test results, was braked from above.
    Sviyazhsk and Uglich - also transferred to February-March of the 2014 of the year. Although they have tests in order and the shooting is successful.

    The various ships actually transferred are forgotten:
    SMK-2093 - which distinguished itself in St. Petersburg on the rise of a collapsed car.
    RB-396 - Astrakhan 705
    BKShch - already 3 pieces were handed over this year, 2 Sokolniki and 1 Blagoveshchensk.

    At the moment, taking into account Severodvinsk, on which the decision was made and the double Dolgoruky (the plant 29 December 2012 passed the year, and the fleet accepted in January 2013 years):
    Total from 37 ships and shipsplanned for transfer this year, only xnumx units actually transferred.
    1. Trailer
      27 December 2013 10: 31
      +4
      Quote: donavi49
      BKShch - already 3 pieces passed this year
      Well, count them - thank you! laughing But about the catamaran and the tug - thanks! Alas, I missed it. About the fact that they passed everything, I do not write. But that surrendered the most - it pleases!
      1. donavi49
        donavi49 27 December 2013 10: 46
        +2
        But in vain, the availability of orders for BCS is a clear signal that there is an urgent need for them. This means that the fleet is increasing combat firing on the fleets (it’s still expensive to hit the floating barracks, and they will end soon), which in itself is excellent wink .

        According to the Cerns, they winter in the Lower - 2 passed the tests, but did not go to the Caspian. By the way, these are somewhat unusual Chamois, but with a new power MTU.
        1. Trailer
          27 December 2013 10: 57
          +1
          Quote: donavi49
          By chamois
          Was there information that they had been tested to the end in May in Nizhny and should have been dragged to the Caspian?
        2. Trailer
          27 December 2013 10: 57
          0
          Quote: donavi49
          By chamois
          Was there information that they had been tested to the end in May in Nizhny and should have been dragged to the Caspian?
          1. donavi49
            donavi49 27 December 2013 11: 15
            +2
            Not dragged, winter in the Lower. There are chamois in the Caspian, which were on the exercises, here are photos from them.
            1. 955535
              955535 27 December 2013 23: 10
              0
              Your untruth. S-810 went to the Caspian. S-811 at the Black Sea Fleet.
    2. The comment was deleted.
  11. Boris55
    Boris55 27 December 2013 10: 32
    +2
    Handsome!
    This is a good example of those screaming alarmists that everything in Russia is ruined, everything is lost and nothing is being built.
    Not only one shipyard works to build a ship ... The defense industry will pull Russia out!
  12. itr
    itr 27 December 2013 11: 08
    +3
    Author patriot !!!
    but the fact is the fact that the fleet really didn’t get anything!
    half of the ships can be called with a stretch so boats and boats!
    the fleet cannot exist without ships !!!
    We are waiting for 14 years, the situation may change
    I didn’t want to offend my patriots with my comment.
    1. samoletil18
      samoletil18 27 December 2013 12: 10
      +4
      Quote: itr
      Author patriot !!!
      but the fact is the fact that the fleet really didn’t get anything!
      half of the ships can be called with a stretch so boats and boats!
      the fleet cannot exist without ships !!!
      We are waiting for 14 years, the situation may change
      I didn’t want to offend my patriots with my comment.

      Frames lost. It is necessary to grow new ones. Let small ships for now. Otherwise, you can cut it, and a ship of 30000 tons of displacement or 500 tons - the difference is huge in terms of damage.
      "Vikramaditya"
      1. itr
        itr 27 December 2013 12: 16
        0
        I do not mind the plane but very slowly!
      2. itr
        itr 27 December 2013 12: 16
        +1
        I do not mind the plane but very slowly!
  13. Kolyan 2
    Kolyan 2 27 December 2013 11: 10
    +1
    Quote: Nayhas
    Quote: Karavan
    But, without these tugboats, no ship will sail beyond the mooring wall.

    Undoubtedly, it is impossible without support vessels, but somehow everyone is waiting for "something else" ...

    Not immediately Moscow was built. Now they’ve even begun to build, I think they are also building up capacity, I expect a gradual increase in shipbuilding drinks
  14. malikszh
    malikszh 27 December 2013 12: 04
    +1
    Guys what is heard about the purchase of Ukrainian is not up to a slender ship? Is Russia buying or not?
    1. samoletil18
      samoletil18 27 December 2013 12: 12
      +3
      Quote: malikszh
      Guys what is heard about the purchase of Ukrainian is not up to a slender ship? Is Russia buying or not?

      I join: will Russia buy Ukraine?
      1. Roman 1977
        Roman 1977 27 December 2013 12: 29
        +5
        Allegedly, in December, according to Ukrainian sources, our delegation visited Nikolaev, examined the cruiser, conducted negotiations, but nothing can be said with firm certainty:
        On Monday, December 16, a delegation from the Russian Federation visited the plant named after 61 Communard. At the same time, the visit was not advertised anywhere, and from the representatives of the authorities of the arrivals only the head of the Nikolaev RSA Nikolay Kruglov was accompanying.
        About it "News-N" became known from own sources in the Nikolaev regional state administration.
        According to the source, the purpose of the visit of the Russians, among whom was the special representative of the President of Russia, former Prime Minister Viktor Zubkov, was to inspect the Ukraine missile cruiser, which is located at the plant. The issue of buying the cruiser by the Russians has already been practically resolved, therefore, the delegation should evaluate the technical condition of the ship, the degree of its readiness, which, according to the Russians, is lower than that declared by the Nikolaev shipbuilders, and also consider the possibilities of the plant regarding its completion.

        http://novosti-n.mk.ua/news/read/61997.html




  15. ed65b
    ed65b 27 December 2013 12: 23
    +5
    Thanks to the author. I am glad that there is, but will be even more. In the Navy, they don’t sit on loshki, they know subtle places there and direct funds.
  16. sub307
    sub307 27 December 2013 12: 38
    +2
    It would be nice to give information in parallel: what and how much was removed from the fleet, so for objectivity and "completeness of the picture."
    1. malikszh
      malikszh 27 December 2013 12: 50
      +1
      you don’t want too much))) actually this is classified information.
      1. sub307
        sub307 27 December 2013 21: 33
        -1
        Oh really.
      2. The comment was deleted.
    2. The comment was deleted.
  17. Sochi
    Sochi 27 December 2013 12: 47
    +1
    Damn, after such a collapse ... to build even this - already looks like a feat.
  18. RBLip
    RBLip 27 December 2013 13: 19
    +2
    Thanks to the author. the article is interesting. a lot of pictures. that's just ... compare the replenishment of our fleet with the replenishment of sworn "friends" ... I think it would be funny if it were not so scary.
  19. jjj
    jjj 27 December 2013 13: 56
    0
    Friends, we will not skimp on the number of tugs. Just think why it took so many auxiliary port vessels. That's right, with a good owner everything is done ahead of time. And still significantly and the number of MNSs
    1. donavi49
      donavi49 27 December 2013 14: 14
      0
      Tugs - because they can be built now, quickly and relatively cheaply. Vaughn Pella - 11 pieces were handed over in a year. Of these, 6 went to the Pacific Fleet, including the heavy 900 tons of PE-65, which were immediately put into action!

      Why is 3 Rooked for a year - so Zeleny Dol rivets them without much drawdown on other orders, plus Sochi 2014, and the Navy also has anti-sabotage ships of the 60's that are crumbling. Do you need a replacement? I need it. Can you build quickly and relatively efficiently? Yes.

      Next year, the River Shipyards will arrive in time with a dozen Diving boats - this is also necessary!

      Flagships of shipbuilding, such as Severnaya Verf, Yantar, Sevmash, Admiralteiki, are loaded at all 150%. Nothing will be accelerated from the fact that they will gain more money and pledge a superplanned ship, and the pledged one will be built on the residual principle, because it’s banal to go anywhere beyond blocks and backlogs, as there are simply NO FREE PLACES IN THESE ENTERPRISES! There's nowhere to mold.

      The next year, Yantar should launch the 2 frigate, and the SV - the 1 frigate. But these are only descents, add to this actually a year for completion and testing. Despite the officially announced graphics, I am skeptical about the head 11356 adopted in 2014. They can accept 22350 if they pass the tests there without a hitch or by order from above, as with Severodvinsk.

      However, it is quite realistic, next year will be:
      1 Frigate
      1 Corvette - Resistant already on trial
      1 DEPL 636
      1-3 MRK 21631 - because Uglich and Sviyazhsk can accept 31 by order from above, then only 1 will be transferred next year.
      Rook even more, 2-3 Dugonga, even more tugboats, a dozen diving vessels.

      Here is a small table - about SSBNs in parentheses this is Dolgoruky, they write it in 2 lines, because the plant was handed over to the tree, and the fleet took it after the New Year holidays.
      1. chunga-changa
        chunga-changa 27 December 2013 22: 29
        0
        Quote: donavi49
        1 DEPL 636

        They promise three, obviously there will be two.
  20. Andy
    Andy 27 December 2013 14: 22
    +5
    an article in the style of "we are from the future" - should be adopted in 2014 ... and why was it included in this list? FOR QUANTITY? go again next year, they say they have already accepted.

    but in fact, apart from 3 submarines and small ships, nothing. a 130 ton rook is proud, trembles AUG of a probable friend.

    And I forgot, there are boats, there are no missiles ... it's sad to read all these "victorious" reports
  21. moremansf
    moremansf 27 December 2013 14: 45
    +1
    Thanks to the author for the review! A start has been made, as the great strategist said: - "The ice has broken ..." Next year, the list of warships, I hope, will be bigger !!! Seven feet under the keel!!!
  22. Evgeniy667b
    Evgeniy667b 27 December 2013 16: 03
    +2
    Tugs, tugs all around! Fishlessness and cancer. But Vietnam, China, India, Indonesia ... How many ships and submarines took. Disgustingly becomes from this dope.
  23. fedora
    fedora 27 December 2013 16: 34
    +1
    Unfortunately, warships and submarines that became part of the Navy in 2013 (with the exception of the "kids") did not receive full-fledged weapons, control systems and are, so far, only floating structures capable of moving across the sea, at best showing a flag.
  24. Technologist
    Technologist 27 December 2013 16: 35
    +1
    Quote: Evgeniy667b
    Tugs, tugs all around!


    And there is no sense from "Boreyev", like from a dog without teeth (((
  25. xomaNN
    xomaNN 27 December 2013 17: 27
    0
    To the volumes of the times of the beginning of the 80s in the USSR is still far away. But the direction and pace are pleasing wink
  26. Jedi
    Jedi 27 December 2013 17: 36
    +1
    Denis Davydov, if you managed to bring Peter to ice, well done ... in October, I saw him near the wall in Yaroslavl. where they did it. By the way, a photo from there ...
  27. typhoon7
    typhoon7 27 December 2013 19: 13
    0
    There is movement and this is good. Thank you Eugene for a good photo selection. +
  28. uizik
    uizik 27 December 2013 19: 25
    +2
    Almost one auxiliary fleet!
  29. chunga-changa
    chunga-changa 27 December 2013 22: 20
    0
    They write that Severodvinsk will go into experimental operation.
    So it will not go to the database?
  30. nightingale
    nightingale 27 December 2013 22: 43
    +1
    Shipbuilding still can’t get out of the pit; ten ships were made just fighting. gunsmiths are slowing down now. part of the armament is not only not manufactured but not accepted for service. the weapons that were not accepted were delivered to the army and then formalities with acceptance were withdrawn. apparently it’s not a matter of formalities that the gunsmiths didn’t succeed.
  31. Power
    Power 27 December 2013 23: 31
    +5
    Looked at the photo, a pitiful sight not worthy of the country of Peter the Great. As it was in the 45th "satisfied with the ruins of the Reichstag." By God, if I was some kind of "sent Cossack" like Chubais? would have felt pride in the work done on the collapse of the Navy. It's a shame for the state.
  32. linen
    linen 28 December 2013 02: 11
    +1
    Yeah, after the article about * Ford * and * Let * these photos cause strange feelings ... To even be a little equal .. that’s better for Sochi * to admire *
  33. patriot0110
    patriot0110 28 December 2013 07: 14
    +1
    5 pictures from the top !! ok and the rest are motor boats !! to the battle with NATO we’ll bury the oars!
  34. Takashi
    Takashi 28 December 2013 14: 43
    +2
    summing up the total:
    ICAPL pr. 885 "Severodvinsk" - displacement of 11800 tons
    RPKSN pr. 955 "Vladimir Monomakh" - displacement of 17000 tons.
    RPKSN pr. 955 "Alexander Nevsky" - displacement 17000t.
    и
    Corvette pr. 20380 “Boyky” - displacement of 2100 tons

    that’s all warships. Of these, 2 is long-term construction (20 years on the slipway).
    You can also highlight:
    RTOs pr. 21631 "Uglich" - displacement 949t.
    RTOs pr. 21631 Grad Sviyazhsk - displacement 949t.
    like ships up to 1000 tons.

    and everything?
    Found something to be proud of.

    All these tugboats, rescuers, anti-reverse, .... a normal factory should stamp in 1-2-3 months !!!!

    Build a tugboat - like a yacht for Abramovich.
  35. Andrey77
    Andrey77 28 December 2013 17: 52
    +1
    And did anyone remember the moorings, coastal services? Or will the sailors live on ships, a la the 80s?
  36. nnz226
    nnz226 28 December 2013 18: 05
    +1
    Of course progress is good, but !!! You will not fight with tugs .... Again, from the surface ships swing that it was possible to "squeeze" these corvettes, that is, according to the Soviet classification - IPC (small anti-submarine ships) again and they all went to the Caspian. What's this?! The most militarized and dangerous region from the side of a military threat to Russia ???
  37. coserg 2012
    coserg 2012 2 January 2014 19: 27
    0
    It is necessary not to buy an old 1st rank clunker from Ukraine, but to order 4-6 hulls of ships of the same class. And finish building at their shipyards near the wall. Now they will call them a "strategist" and instruct them on the disadvantages.