The first metal gun printed on the 3D printer

88

Half a year has passed since the plastic “World's First Fire Gun, fully printed on an 3D printer” was introduced. And here engineers from the Texan company Solid Concepts for the first time in the world printed a metal pistol. They did this to demonstrate the capabilities of modern industrial 3D printing and do not set a goal to make technology available in every home. However, sooner or later it will inevitably happen.

For the demonstration was made cult gun M1911, created by John Browning. This is the first self-loading pistol, which began to be used in the US Army, before that they had only revolvers.

Pictured: A working copy of a M1911 self-loading pistol developed by John Browning. The gun was in service with the US Army from 1911 to 1985 years.

Parts of the gun are made by the method of direct laser sintering of metal (DMLS), the same method that NASA uses to print rocket engine parts. Only the springs were made separately. After printing, the parts were polished and fitted to each other by hand.

During tests, the gun proved high accuracy of shooting.



Representatives of the company say that they printed the gun not to make this process cheaper and more accessible to every man in the street, but simply to demonstrate the reliability of parts manufactured by the DMLS method. Metal printing equipment cannot be bought for less than $ 10 thousand, which most 3D print enthusiasts cannot afford. The company itself Solid Concepts used an even more expensive industrial printer, see video.



Solid Concepts is licensed to manufacture weapons and promises to produce within five days and send to the buyer a set of 3D parts for assembling a pistol. Naturally, only a US citizen who has the appropriate permission can make a purchase.

▶ ▶ ▶ 3D Printed Metal Gun Test Fire (screenshots taken from both videos)

“Our pants-gun expert released 50 charges and hit several silhouettes in more than 30 meters. The weapon consists of more than 30 preprinted stainless steel components 17-4 and Inconel-625. It is completed by a selective laser-sintered (SLS) three-dimensional laser grip. ”

“The whole concept of using a laser sintering process for three-dimensional printing of weapons from metal revolves around evidence of reliability, accuracy, ease of use for printing metal functional prototypes and end-use products,” says Kent Firestone. “It is a common misconception that laser sintering is not accurate or durable enough, and we are working to change technological prospects for humanity.”

Another common misconception about three-dimensional printing is that it is limited to desktop printers, which can only squeeze plastic threads.

For the sake of debunking all the myths and misconceptions surrounding the three-dimensional printing, the engineers built a technology demonstrator, no doubt. Leaders will no longer be able to pretend and diminish the prospects of this industry.

Laser sintering is one of the most accurate manufacturing processes available, with an excess sufficient to create interchangeable, requiring tight tolerances of the interacting parts of the gun. Printed metal surpasses precision casting in terms of porosity and machining accuracy.

Weapon rifles were built, or “grown”, cleanly, without being further machined. Hand tools are used only in the decoration, without affecting the mechanism obtained solely through printing.







































88 comments
Information
Dear reader, to leave comments on the publication, you must sign in.
  1. +19
    9 November 2013 08: 41
    As recently as a year ago here on the site they proved to me that the barrel could not be printed.
    1. +12
      9 November 2013 11: 47
      Soon any equipment capable of producing volumetric parts will be called a 3D printer, but rather it is a further development or one of the technologies of powder metallurgy.
    2. +3
      9 November 2013 14: 01
      Soon, children can be sold as a designer, print and collect))))
      1. +3
        9 November 2013 14: 09
        materiallab.ru/ the most- cheap-3d-printer-in-world- meeting/
        Despite the fact that the 3D printer of the new budget generation - Bucaneer - can already be bought for only 400 dollars, many users are not happy with such a low price. And so the search for solutions continues
        ...
        Now Matthew has already thought about improving the technology for producing freebies for 3D printing and is building a machine for processing plastic bottles into a thread for an 3D printer.
    3. +2
      10 November 2013 23: 25
      We have no idea what the future holds for us ...
  2. Altair
    +9
    9 November 2013 09: 01
    The largest rocket engine part, created using 3D printingsuccessfully tested by NASA
    http://www.rnd.cnews.ru/tech/news/line/index_science.shtml?2013/08/29/540837
    Arcam
    1. 0
      9 November 2013 18: 43
      This is not a finished part, but its workpiece. Then it is still subjected to finishing.
      1. Altair
        0
        9 November 2013 19: 26
        Pruflink where?
        1. +1
          9 November 2013 21: 03
          And you try to put the untreated turbine blade into the engine, you will see what happens. 3D printing does not provide the required roughness of the working surface of the scapula.
          1. Altair
            +3
            9 November 2013 21: 35
            Do you work for ARCAM?
            How is finishing done?
            How are parts having a complex internal structure processed?
            1. +1
              10 November 2013 01: 14
              Polishing and balancing, internal cavities, if necessary, are processed by traditional methods.
              1. Altair
                +1
                10 November 2013 09: 34
                Feel free to add to your words pruflink. wink
                1. 0
                  10 November 2013 12: 01
                  Polishing of the external curved surfaces is carried out on a robotic complex (mechanical hand, trajectory of movement - according to the program), followed by sorting of the blades by weight.
                  We tried to make some parts from a heat-resistant alloy with an intermetallic core. Finishing is indispensable.
                  Your link describes a part for a rocket engine, not an airplane turbine (as in the video) this time, and secondly, it does not say that the part obtained by this method is completely ready for use. As for the treatment of the internal hidden cavities of the injector, it is possible that they really are not processed.
                  1. Altair
                    +1
                    10 November 2013 13: 11
                    Quote: fero
                    Tried we делать some details from a heat-resistant alloy with an intermetallic core. Finishing is indispensable.

                    On ARCAM 3D printers?
                    Quote: fero
                    Your link describes a part for a rocket engine, not an airplane turbine (as in the video) this time

                    It is understandable. I posted the video to show the capabilities of the technology.
                    Quote: fero
                    Secondly it doesn’t say there that the part obtained by this method is completely ready for use.

                    The rocket engine part was made using a 3D printer using a laser beam (SLM), while ARCAM 3D printers use an electron beam (EBM).
                    1. 0
                      10 November 2013 13: 22
                      no, not ARCAM, the printer is different
  3. +2
    9 November 2013 09: 01
    Impressive. The author of the material thanks for the work.
  4. poccinin
    +2
    9 November 2013 09: 10
    there will be one problem. when these printers go on sale in stores. everyone will start riveting weapons, which is what they are looking for. (on TV the plot showed the parents bought an 3 printer and make toys for the child.)
    1. +4
      9 November 2013 12: 03
      Quote: poccinin
      there will be one problem. when these printers go on sale in stores. everyone will start riveting weapons, which is what they are looking for. (on TV the plot showed the parents bought an 3 printer and make toys for the child.)


      Not the biggest problem - I wonder how many people (potentially) the development of this technology will make unemployed what (I write and feel like a grumbling old man laughing ).
      1. +8
        9 November 2013 12: 21
        Quote: SHILO
        Not the biggest problem - I wonder how many people (potentially) the development of this technology will make unemployed

        All the same, highly qualified specialists will be needed. And the technology is terrible for countries supplying low-skilled labor.
        1. +10
          9 November 2013 14: 34
          Using a slightly simpler device, Soviet engineers cast cement houses. Well, more precisely, it turned out not cement, but a puff cement film, a kind of bulk iron. In strength, such a house was approximately on par with 20 steel. But the Soviet leaders were no longer able to realize the advantages of the method. Brains at that time were already considered a crime in the USSR by themselves.
          3 printer is not needed for collapse unemployment, it can be arranged right now. Launch revolving lines, and all sorts of printers seem just childhood. It is necessary to change the social structure in any way. But just what?
          1. +2
            9 November 2013 14: 47
            The way you change is smooth.
            The restructuring of equipment is more inertial than re-profiling personnel into more human, less monkey sites. Under capitalism, it will result in benefits for extra people who are not counted. With socialist planning, it starts up to reduce the working day, culture, health and other social security.
          2. +1
            9 November 2013 15: 36
            In the USA, they came up with this technology, but it didn’t work, unemployment and they didn’t need expensive property, even our builders are not interested in this.
            South Korea is already trying this technology.
            At the expense of iron concrete, I read even Yu.Tehnike still seem in 1983.

            Quote: Mikhail3
            It is necessary to change the social structure in any way. But just which one?

            It is true that at least it would remind Germany of capital-socialism or something. Public-private partnership.
            1. Abracadabra
              +4
              10 November 2013 17: 14
              In England, USA, Australia, the Anglo-Saxon model of capitalism. Russia is more suitable for a social market economy, as in Germany, Sweden, and France.
  5. +2
    9 November 2013 09: 31
    When cheap "home" ones appear, this is where there will be room for the flight of thought and its implementation! And as always, any idea has two sides - good and bad. Which one to implement - everyone decides to the best of their understanding.
  6. makarov
    +1
    9 November 2013 09: 32
    Not particularly surprised. And they printed that means of destruction (homicide).
    Now, if they started printing organs for transplantation, then yes, this is progress for humanity. And so - just "motnya".
    1. +2
      9 November 2013 11: 57
      It already exists, habrahabr.ru/company/invitro/blog/194064/ - It was he who invented the technology of organ printing and patented it in the USA, participated in the development of three modifications of bioprinters, and he is the “chief scientist” in the new laboratory in Moscow ...
      But in this example, it’s somewhat difficult to print organs as a demonstrator of metal work.
  7. +5
    9 November 2013 09: 58
    I wonder what shot the shooter will tear off his fingers?
  8. 0
    9 November 2013 10: 00
    So progress has come to print in metal. Although the printing capabilities in terms of accuracy and internal structure of the final product are still limited (roughness, porosity), but this is already a big step in mechanical engineering technology, many of those can be replaced. operations. Final machining is still necessary, in the video, the thread in the pinion hole is cut with a tap. Now, when the next message on the topic of printing weapons on a 3D printer appears in the news, it is necessary to clarify whether this is a printer for metal or plastic. A plastic printer can be bought over the Internet almost freely and not expensive. I hope the printer for metal will not be so easy to purchase, most likely its price will be comparable to the cost of a good modern metal cutting machine and only large enterprises will be able to purchase a printer.
  9. Asan Ata
    +3
    9 November 2013 10: 22
    The feeling that the parts are no stronger than those obtained by powder metallurgy. The same sintering. It’s clear that they will receive the form, but the structure? Bullshit.
  10. makarov
    +1
    9 November 2013 10: 24
    Quote: sergey32
    As recently as a year ago here on the site they proved to me that the barrel could not be printed.

    you can print only the likeness of the trunk. They proved everything right to you.
  11. -2
    9 November 2013 10: 40
    Quote: Asan Ata

    The feeling that the parts are no stronger than those obtained by powder metallurgy. The same sintering. It’s clear that they will receive the form, but the structure? Bullshit.

    This is probably why, to compensate for the porous structure, a viscous material was used - stainless steel, so as not to burst immediately.
    1. Altair
      +4
      9 November 2013 10: 59
      In the West, intermetallic compounds (titanium aluminide) are already used in 3D printing using EBM technology (electron beam instead of laser).
      http://www.arcam.com/arcam-wins-order-for-four-ebm-systems-signs-long-term-agree
      ment-with-avio /
      ----
      http://www.arcam.com/solutions/aerospace-ebm/
  12. +6
    9 November 2013 10: 54
    Fantasy! Amazing people, great engineers!
  13. 0
    9 November 2013 11: 31
    Stanochka is a little over 850 pieces.
    By the way, I heard that the Bilderberger Club, the so-called .ZD printers, they want to take control of.
  14. +2
    9 November 2013 11: 32
    I wonder how many shots this barrel will withstand, and what is its cost compared to conventional?
    1. +2
      9 November 2013 11: 56
      Quote: Pablo_K
      I wonder how many shots this barrel will withstand, and what is its cost compared to conventional?

      Cost = powder price, printer amortization, payment for grinding the barrel.
      1. 0
        9 November 2013 12: 05
        The authors claim that this barrel did without grinding.
        1. +1
          9 November 2013 14: 05
          ... the first couple of shots ground the surface .. I certainly didn’t need polishing fellow
  15. +4
    9 November 2013 14: 03
    ... no, well, it is clear what they are pulling for ... to abolish entire branches of classical mechanical engineering ... this is only so far "clumsy" workpieces that need additional processing of the "bird" of the joke "finalize with a file" ... As soon as they go to "nano" level, as in electronics, everything will be just fine. Approximately the same as it was with high-precision casting that canceled the stages of post-casting processing.
  16. Kir
    +2
    9 November 2013 15: 32
    Excuse me, well, where is the printer - where is it a printing device? In general, the fact that the sticks were not "sculpted" by this method speaks of quality, forgive one another, but how much energy does this equipment "eat"? It seems that in all this hype, as always, the main loot, and here I see two points either something related to promotions, or how gadgets need 5% and all 100% of consumers pay for them where this gadget is included, although we they say that you need to think about yourself first, etc., forgive me of course, but what about.
    About progressives - adepts of the belief that everything new will replace the obsolete old and everything will be in chocolate, well, well, you see, they have not played enough, history has not taught anything "Photo will kill Painting", "Digital will kill Analog", etc., etc. , well, how has progress led to a reduction in prices ?, old technologies have died ?, No? the quality is declining (not for all goods, but for the majority), and the price of something is growing, and the rich are in no hurry to abandon items made using old technologies.
  17. vanaheym
    +12
    9 November 2013 16: 54
    Yes, modern technology is increasingly reducing the role of unskilled labor, turning the worker more into a computer operator.
    Here's the type of how this machine makes a whole fleet of simpler machines unnecessary along with their operators.
    1. +5
      9 November 2013 18: 07
      Apparently I am very backward in machine tool building, but after watching this video I’m shocked to be honest)))))
      For a long time I did not get such pleasure from such advertising :)
    2. +1
      9 November 2013 18: 49
      Not certainly in that way. There are other machines)). A good thing, of course, but for the machine to pay for itself, it must work in three shifts without a break. And do not forget that a qualified operator (able to compile a program and minimal setup) is very expensive. And repair and maintenance of CNC machines by an authorized dealer costs a lot of space ... the truth is, of course, they are of high quality.
      Due to the enormous price of most CNC machines, in Russia, machines mainly from China and Taiwan are popular.
      1. vanaheym
        +4
        9 November 2013 21: 12
        Quote: fero
        And do not forget that a qualified operator (able to compile a program and minimal setup) is very expensive.

        At European prices, the operator of such a CNC machine costs about 3000 Euros.
        In Ukraine, such a specialist is paid about 1000 euros.
        For one reason, that he is not a milling machine operator, not a turner, and not a designer - he is engaged in entering programs into the machine controller.
        It is cheaper than a machine park and a crowd of turners and milling machines.
        This machine costs about $ 870000. Having made, for example, 2000 monolithic aluminum appers for AR-15 at $ 600 - the machine will already break off and make a profit.
    3. +4
      9 November 2013 19: 25
      Thanks for the video, it’s interesting to see. If I just showed a detail of such a configuration, I would not have believed that there were no welding and that it was done on the machine.
      1. 0
        9 November 2013 20: 05
        For a long time already in the world, people have been assembling CNC milling machines, in the CIS there are quite a few of them. You can say on the knees they collect, some of which achieve amazing results. Stepper motors, servo drives, high-frequency motors, etc., everything can be ordered in China by mail, so on average, a small machine will come out in 2-5 bucks. Depending on the program, and this would be the most important thing, the cutters can handle any material.
        Here is an approximate video, I think that over time and 3D printers will be able to collect.
        1. +1
          9 November 2013 22: 52
          Apr. 2012
          Diego Porqueras has launched a kickstater campaign to launch the production of 3D printers for enthusiasts. The Diego project belongs to the category of Open Hardware, all drawings will be made public.
          Like RepRap, the new 3D printer is self-replicating, i.e. with it, you can print some of the parts necessary for your own assembly.
          http://www.opennet.ru/opennews/art.shtml?num=33678
    4. Lesnik
      +1
      11 November 2013 23: 53
      Yes, modern technology is increasingly reducing the role of unskilled labor, turning the worker more into a computer operator.

      This is called TECHNICAL EXCELLENCE !!!!!!
      Question HOW is the workpiece cooled?
      1. +1
        12 November 2013 13: 17
        It does not need much cooling: temperature deformation is taken into account during shaping.
        See below the welding zones in the figure:
        http://topwar.ru/uploads/images/2013/616/wcas660.jpg
        From the article
        laser-hit.ru/2012-01-19-18-15-56/item/52-теория-резки
        laser-hit.ru/2012-01-19-18-15-56/item/53-теория-лазерной-сварки
  18. Asan Ata
    +3
    9 November 2013 17: 01
    I looked again - powder in its pure form. It is clear that it is not suitable for shock loads, you will not make responsible nodes from this tripe. Can replace casting. In the nanovariant, it is possible to create such a thing in the future, then we'll talk.
    1. vanaheym
      +3
      9 November 2013 18: 31
      Quote: Asan Ata
      responsible nodes from this tripe you will not do

      Well, for example, blades for aircraft turbines are made on ARCAM machines using this technology. Where is even more responsible?
      1. Kir
        0
        9 November 2013 19: 29
        And what about materials with memory, if I don’t confuse the blades just from their number, then it’s already growing, and the price is astronomy.
        Can do it now, But forgive me for whom, for James Bond? so all over the world, count these on the fingers, and use CNC more often starting with large-scale to pay off. And I’ll repeat once again that the springs are made in a different way says a lot!
        1. Altair
          +2
          9 November 2013 20: 34
          Quote: Kir
          And again I’m repeating one thing The springs are made in a different way. says a lot!

          3D printer 3D printer is different. ARCAM 3D printers do not use a laser beam, but an electronic one.
        2. vanaheym
          +1
          9 November 2013 21: 22
          The blades are made of some kind of cunning titanium aluminum oxide (xs what is it).
          Made from powder. The production cost is approximately 2 euros per cubic centimeter.
          1. Altair
            +1
            9 November 2013 21: 46
            It is written that of titanium aluminide (intermetallic).
            http://www.arcam.com/arcam-wins-order-for-four-ebm-systems-signs-long-term-agree
            ment-with-avio /
          2. 0
            10 November 2013 22: 35
            Quote: vanaheym
            The blades are made of some kind of cunning titanium aluminum oxide (xs what is it).
            Made from powder. The production cost is approximately 2 euros per cubic centimeter.

            Fuck! From such "emergency" blades of the GTG (gas turbine generator), we made blades for hunting knives in the service ...
      2. Asan Ata
        +1
        10 November 2013 10: 37
        As far as I know, at ARCAM, melting is carried out in vacuum by a powerful electron beam, that is, layer by layer creating a crystalline structure, here the product resembles sandy beach pies, sorry.
  19. 0
    9 November 2013 17: 55
    "By the way, I heard that the Bilderberg club, the so-called. ЗD printers want to take control"
    But this note is worth paying attention to and watching ...
  20. +3
    9 November 2013 17: 55
    This is probably really a breakthrough technology for very many years, all the screams about the fact that energy is consumed. low quality, impossibility (for now) of some operations, all this is garbage .. this is just the beginning of the journey. Let me remind you that once an aluminum spoon was worth more than gold! Give a little time for 5-10 years, everything will be the way. There is such a thing about the quality of things .. there are some, but there are many reasons and the main thing is marketing tricks, but not as an imperfection of technology. for example, you’re watching a movie, not from a VCR, but from a DVD or from a network, so it will be in this case, but the quality will be different depending on the tasks. We’ve said an engineer a long time ago we can make an eternal electric drill, but it will cost as car .. and who will need this? only in narrow areas (space, military, researchers are different)
    1. Kir
      +4
      9 November 2013 19: 41
      Yes, damn it is not the price, But the fact that long-term businessmen is not profitable !!! About aluminum, well, it was like that, but some that previously had, if not ubiquitous, were many, but now they are worth a lot of money. By the way, it’s not a fact that when a certain level is reached, they will not start promoting another, and this is not at all because the old had no prospects and the dough cannot be cut down.
      About the VCR I had a friend of the military who graduated from something related to devices (I don't remember how long ago it was) and so he said that for the specialists there was such a video recorder, where a film was used as a carrier as on a computer, and so he "tore" all civilian crap even Hi-Fi class. Forgive me about the disks, but this is also the technology of yesterday's day, even all sorts of blues and so on, for a long time (although it seems like the Americans claim that only one, etc.) is shorter as a carrier of a single crystal of quartz and forgive the technology of the 80s if not earlier, just the difference between us and entimi, our business is doing, and they immediately think of commerce - what to take from them.
    2. Shur
      0
      10 November 2013 22: 55
      And such a drill will have its demand.
      1. Kir
        0
        11 November 2013 01: 52
        Everything is much simpler. Take yourself a drill not of a professional series but of a industrial series, and if you don’t feel sorry for the money, then you are obviously a client of the Hilti company (Germany), if you didn’t get a normal drill from them, it’s obviously not about 25.000 rubles. Or a native prom from Metabo.
  21. makarov
    0
    9 November 2013 18: 26
    Uv. comments and readers. Can't you see that this is just PR. It is simply impossible to create a real pistol, taking into account the necessary requirements, using the above technology. By infe, they shot 50 rounds, and they say "everything is great." To check a working layout, it really is necessary to shoot several thousand cartridges, and then omissions and problems emerge. Let me remind you of this fact. When two or more samples of weapons show the same results in the competition, the winner is the one with fewer parts and parts, as well as less work / hours.
    1. vanaheym
      +3
      9 November 2013 21: 23
      Well, that is, with this technology you can make implants and blades for turbines, but a gun - you can’t?
  22. +9
    9 November 2013 19: 39
    It’s not a matter of the gun. These are new technologies that can be used to create parts of a very complex configuration, and even not very expensive. You can also create composite compositions that cannot be obtained due to the non-meltability of some metals. By strength, they can greatly surpass ordinary steel. You can include antifriction or other additives in the metal. Not on home printers, of course. This is a very promising direction for the development of new technologies.
    1. +4
      10 November 2013 11: 00
      New technologies are the engine of the economy. Calculate how many billions the United States received by developing the personal computer industry.
  23. +10
    9 November 2013 20: 44
    1) Chinese TT spat out a dozen shots in 90 - then it was thrown ...
    2) the guys took M1911 as 100 for years an already produced model, what kind of improvements to him, he already won everything before the First World :))))
    3) Inventors did not make a pistol as a weapon, but a pistol as an indicator of complex equipment experiencing decent loads. Made of stainless steel - not the easiest material to process
    Some 10 years ago, 20 gigabyte with RAM in 16mb comp cost a bucks, now a flash drive 32 gigabyte costs 25 dollars. Next may be some kind of plasmoid the size of a pack of cigarettes-progress ....
    1. 0
      10 November 2013 01: 30
      Well, at the expense of 16 meters in 03, you turned down; in 04, I already had about 700 meters of operative on my computer. in 2000, 128 meters modules were used
    2. vanaheym
      0
      10 November 2013 03: 45
      Quote: your1970
      Chinese TT spat out a dozen shots in the 90s - then it was thrown ...

      Type 54 is a completely brutal barrel. Although it has a worse finish than the original, it certainly works quite well. Threw it out because of cheapness. For the same reason, and used to order.
  24. vkrav
    +3
    9 November 2013 20: 47
    Until they figure out the molecular assembly - all this is nothing more than "stages of a long way" (c)
  25. +1
    9 November 2013 21: 11
    Quote: Kir

    About the VCR I had a friend of the military who graduated from something related to devices (I don't remember how long ago it was) and so he said that for the specialists there was such a video recorder, where a film was used as a carrier as on a computer, and so he "tore" all civilian crap even Hi-Fi class.

    I was lying in my warehouse — one reel with a ribbon, pulled and wound around it, constantly chewing on a ribbon, although BASF was strewed and torn in black, so our flyers used VM-12, and not this coffin (weight-12kg passport). The quality of recording and playback, as on the VM-12, is word for word. It was released in the 1974 year, but they said that it was new like that.
    1. Kir
      0
      10 November 2013 02: 28
      I can't honestly say about the model, but I can only say one thing that was not particularly widespread in the army, since my acquaintance, although a soldier, is, let's say, with specifics, so there is every reason to trust his words, and besides, another a former instrumentation engineer, when he heard about it from me, he immediately caught fire, as he understood what it was about. And still it is not necessary to write off the fact that every device has a "character" and the staff also treats devices in different ways. It means that yours were simply not lucky, but mine were lucky.
  26. +6
    9 November 2013 21: 27
    I read it, I thought ... I largely agree with Asan-Ata! There is powder metallurgy, but not in pure form, but in heavily stripped down. The classic powder technology is carried out by sintering under heating and pressure. And the combination of these two factors gives the necessary physical. properties (wear resistance, tensile strength, bending, tensile, torsion and shear). In this case, we have sintering only when heated. The detail will be porous, with an obscure crystalline structure and many stress concentrators!
    In short, for the production of irrelevant parts ... Like the chess in the photo, or the gear knob. True, you can make details of complex shape "+". Until this technology comes into mass production due to cost (I will especially emphasize the word while). This article shows the technological capabilities of the development company, and the pistol is a good example. Its parts are quite complex in shape, and loaded when fired. But the resource will be clearly lower than that of parts made by conventional metal cutting! Another example is the gear in the photo. The workpiece has a rather complex shape, but the teeth need to be ground, hardened, normalized, and ground again. After that, the part becomes a gear! And I doubt that the sintered material is able to withstand such "bullying" during manufacture, and even greater loads during work. Well done guys ...
  27. 0
    10 November 2013 00: 10
    A powder printer is certainly not ice, however, we can assume the appearance of inkjet 3D printers, in which the uniformity of the part will be a cut above.
    1. 0
      10 November 2013 17: 30
      +
      This is the next stage, a little more interesting, but for now we are satisfied with the traditional (for this metallurgy) compaction, in layers (carriage in the photo, with a roller rolling).
  28. +2
    10 November 2013 01: 27
    progress, seek, find ... and all of us are trying to transplant to the "Zhiguli" ... ugh!
  29. vkrav
    +1
    10 November 2013 02: 03
    Quote: artgrad
    and they are trying to transplant us all to the Zhiguli.

    And they are all trying to master the cultivation of single-crystal blades for aircraft turbines, mastered and put into series as early as the Union ... By the way, technologies for growing complex-shaped parts from melts also probably do not stand still ...
    1. Kir
      0
      10 November 2013 02: 33
      And if you drip (Amer), then it’s not a fact that the legs from Soviet developments are growing.
  30. makarov
    +1
    10 November 2013 04: 36
    Quote: vanaheym
    Well, that is, with this technology you can make implants and blades for turbines, but a gun - you can’t?


    If we take into account the factual, for example, the guaranteed number of thousands of shots for the PM barrel is guaranteed, then it turns out that it is impossible.
    At the expense of the blades for turbines (?), It is possible that they are made. Just do not forget that for the military-industrial complex industry, a whole line of DISPOSABLE turbines are manufactured, which have less stringent requirements, in contrast to permanent ones.
    The link in the material to the tests of the ts pistol "weapons expert" does not stand up to any criticism at all. After firing several shots of a pistol clamped in a clamp, without disassembling it and thoroughly examining it for defects, the "expert" starts shooting at targets from his hand ... Forgive me, not an expert, but a footer. There is nothing to discuss. Continuous "blizzard", earlier called eyewash.
    P.S. Pay attention to the condition of the side cutters when they bite off the particles. For me, this is an indicator.
    1. Altair
      +1
      10 November 2013 10: 03
      Quote: makarov
      Just don’t forget that a whole line is being made for the defense industry DISPOSABLE TURBINES

      What then do they show at the video presentation the engine of a passenger plane? Cheating?
  31. makarov
    0
    10 November 2013 10: 44
    Quote: Altair
    What then do they show at the video presentation the engine of a passenger plane? Cheating?


    This question is more for the motor builders. I'll tell you my own vision. The above technology allows for the so-called. "painting", that is, high-quality coating with resistant metal powder. There is infa on the network about this.
  32. +1
    10 November 2013 12: 15
    Quote: vanaheym

    It is cheaper than a machine park and a crowd of turners and milling machines.
    This machine costs about $ 870000. Having made, for example, 2000 monolithic aluminum appers for AR-15 at $ 600 - the machine will already break off and make a profit.

    Is this the price of a machine on a price list? Then do not forget the cost of customs duties, shipping costs, and commissioning. It is generally accepted (at our enterprise), for example, that the cost of commissioning is 10% of the cost of the machine.
    We flew the spindle on a Mazak machine, they waited almost 3 months until they brought it and installed it. About the cost of this site, I generally keep quiet.
    CNC machines in production are good when the warehouse with the dealer’s spare parts is nearby and this warehouse is not empty. Then downtime will be minimal. IMHO
    1. Abracadabra
      +1
      10 November 2013 18: 07
      Yet modern CNC machines, etc. significantly increase productivity and reduce production costs.
  33. Shur
    +2
    10 November 2013 22: 17
    The fastest and most necessary is the introduction of dentistry. Anyone who begins to prosthetize by printing will not be very poor. It will be a real revolution in dentistry. And to grow again is generally a fairy tale.
  34. Aubert
    +1
    11 November 2013 09: 28
    What a useful thing. The farm is useful. Give three.
  35. Boot under the carpet
    0
    11 November 2013 19: 43
    And why is a CNC machine not a 3D printer? And this is far from the latest technology.
  36. 0
    21 November 2013 12: 16
    Solid Concepts continues to test the world's first metal gun printed on an 3D printer. In just a few days, more than 600 shots were made from it, the barrel and receiver perfectly withstand the pressure of 20 000 psi. The firing accuracy remains as high as at the beginning of testing.

    Although an industrial DMLS 3D printer costs several tens of thousands of dollars, on the other hand, friends or neighbors can save up to buy a used printer at an eBay auction for about $ 10 thousand. It can always be used if you need to print the same engine for a car , household utensils or weapons.

    American laws guarantee a citizen the right to make weapons for self-defense; no license is required for this. In Russia, such a printer can also be printed, for example, with a knife.
  37. +1
    8 December 2013 16: 01
    Powder metallurgy cannot, I think, give the whole spectrum offered by "ordinary metallurgy. For example, an ordinary ball water valve made by the powder" method ", if it does not break during installation, then in a year or two it oxidizes along the entire section and falls apart. the method takes place, besides, not the most complicated pistol, compare at least with the “Luger.” In addition, the cost of both 3D printing and the subsequent high-tech, which I have no doubt, the processing will be equal in quality and cost at least not soon. ”For me, it's better from a GOOD RENTAL and the traditional method.
  38. 0
    14 December 2013 16: 53
    Free 3D metal printer

    Based on the open printer RepRap made a printer that can "print" from metal. Already, it will be more profitable for American families to make many household items on home printers than to buy, in addition, they will spend less on natural resources.

    The printer is a modified RepRap, in which the Millermatic 140 argon welding machine was installed as the printhead. The cost of components according to Pierce's calculations is about 1200 dollars. The most expensive parts are a welding machine (price in Russia ~ 32000 rubles), a microcontroller board and thick aluminum plates.



    vimeo.com/5202148

    linux.org.ru/news/hardware/9899478
    1. Kir
      0
      14 December 2013 18: 56
      Excuse me, do you yourself believe this advertising chatter?
      1. 0
        14 December 2013 19: 01
        There is nothing complicated in this craft, as there is no advertising, for the absence of the beneficiary: the project is freely available, and it will beat off its 200 dollars, if necessary.
        1. Kir
          0
          14 December 2013 19: 24
          There is advertising, it’s one other thing, in my opinion the one thing is that so many hard-working people about health should say a lot. In this regard, I remembered the words of one of the American classics
          A good product does not need advertising.

          Yes, and why then they don’t do this for us, if everything is so easy and simple?
          Just sit still and think about why all this.
          1. 0
            14 December 2013 20: 27
            With us - where is it? It is equally open to the whole world. For a private trader, not for a factory.
            If necessary, I’ll make it easier: I’ll add the vertical coordinate of the table to the existing torch, everything is stuck in the laptop, the welder is available, and he will not be consumed from this operation.
            But so far it is not as interesting as a variant of laser accuracy.
            1. Kir
              0
              14 December 2013 21: 04
              In Russia, and by the way, software was not added to the cost of which, then how much electricity this "complex" would like to "eat". And in general, do not find the strangeness, minke whales are so used to service. as perhaps no one. all of a sudden they themselves will begin to “sculpt” something in a handicraft way, which is hard to believe in it.
              1. 0
                14 December 2013 21: 15
                "to the cost of which the software was not added"
                What is there to service, and the software, in fact, is free.
  39. 0
    7 January 2014 19: 39
    Limited Edition of One Hundred 3D Printed Iron Guns Available
    27 December 2013, 11: 44
    3dindustry.ru news
    Solid Concepts, the first manufacturer of fully functional semi-automatic iron 3D printing guns, announced that a limited edition of 100 3D printing iron guns was on sale. Cost is $ 11900 per unit.
  40. 0
    10 October 2014 14: 36
    Ghost Gunner 3D Printer: Legal Printing of Firearms at Home
    vooruzhen.ru/news/98/7635/
    This $ 1299 printing device allows you to make the basic structural element of a semi-automatic rifle at home.
    The manufacturer not only managed to quickly find buyers for the third batch of "ghostly" devices, but was also forced to increase the cost of products from $ 999 to $ 1299.

    The printer is capable of manufacturing a key component of firearms, which, unlike the official carbines, will not have any individual serial rooms, nor need permits. The wearing and use of a partially printed rifle in the United States is not formally prohibited by law, although it causes a storm of protests among disarmament civilians.

    The resulting lower part of the receiver although it will require some artisanal refinements, however, in general it is an element ready for 80%. “Just follow the instructions to print the mechanism, and then work a bit with a screwdriver and become the owner of an oversized firearm in one day without leaving your own home,” reads the inscription on the developers website.