Sergei Shoigu customizes the creators of Russian drone drone

35
The head of the Russian Defense Ministry, Sergei Shoigu, demanded that Russian developers of attack unmanned aerial vehicles (UAVs) speed up the pace of work. Perhaps the first results of their activities can be seen already by 2014. According to Oleg Bochkarev, Deputy Chairman of the Military Industrial Commission (MIC) under the Russian government, today in our country, work on the development of drums drones the companies Transas, Sukhoi and Sokol are engaged in. At the same time, Bochkarev noted that if the Transas company submits its development for testing next year (an attack drone weighing about 1 ton), then the military-industrial complex will be satisfied with these terms. Initially, the development schedule planned the appearance of this UAV no earlier than 2017.

The deputy head of the military industrial complex explained that Sergei Shoigu gave the above mentioned instruction during one of the demonstrations of Russian projects on unmanned aerial vehicles in Alabino near Moscow. Recall that the topic that affects the need to accelerate work in this direction, rises in Russia quite often. For example, at a recent meeting of the collegium of the Ministry of Defense of the Russian Federation, Sergei Shoigu criticized the developers of military robotics. The Minister proposed to stop cooperation with those companies and organizations that would not agree with the tightening of the development time of various types of weapons.

A rather large-scale event in Alabino, within which all Russian developments in UAVs, including strike dronestook place in July 2013. At the same time, Sergei Shoigu was shown the practical use of drone systems. Representatives of industry and the Russian Armed Forces also presented to the Minister of Defense the performance characteristics of promising models of Russian drones (about 30 models).

Sergei Shoigu customizes the creators of Russian drone drone
UAV Dozor-600

It should be noted that currently most of the UAVs used in the world are of American or Israeli origin. And although today drones are in service with the armies of many states, including Russia, the United States has the biggest predilection for this type of weapon, which, however, does not quite successfully manage to use them. Information about casualties among civilians in the Middle East as a result of attack drone drone instead of the destruction of terrorists has become almost commonplace. It has even reached conflicts within the United States themselves. For example, not so long ago, a group of activists protested against the construction of a command center based on Horsham.

Today, modern drones are simply necessary for the Russian army. It is worth recalling that it is planned to equip the unmanned aerial vehicle units created in the Russian Armed Forces with these complexes. They are created for the Airborne Forces, the Navy and, of course, the Ground Forces. The creation of such drones is very important for reconnaissance, the effective use of weapons (adjusting artillery fire and aviation), ensuring the actions of troops on the battlefield. At the same time, if there are certain successes with reconnaissance UAVs in Russia, then with drums everything is much more complicated. All of them are currently only at the development stage.

It is worth noting that Russian companies are likely to cope with the implementation of the project on a drone with a mass of about 1 tons. In any case, the St. Petersburg enterprise Tranzas was already engaged in the development of such devices. Previously, this company designed and built a single-engine Dozor-600 UAV, which, according to its characteristics, is quite comparable with the famous American Predator. For example, the St. Petersburg drone with a maximum take-off weight of 640 kg., Able to reach speeds of up to 210 km / h and fly at altitudes up to 7500 m. The range of this drone is 3700 km. Dozor-600 is able to carry a payload of up to 220 kg onboard, being continuously in the sky for up to 30 hours. His first flight of the UAV "Dozor-600" made in 2010 year.

Model of a shock UAV Skat RSK MiG

According to Viktor Godunov, who until 2012 was the vice president of Transas (died 25 on June 2012), his company entered into a strategic partnership agreement with Sokol (Kazan), which provides for joint work on drones created within the framework of tenders announced by the Russian Ministry of Defense. In particular, it was reported that Transas will be engaged in the development of on-board electronics and control systems for UAVs, and the Falcon OKB will be engaged in the design of UAVs and ground complexes for them. Companies can submit their drones next year. If this happens, flight tests of the models can begin with 2015. We are talking about the work on the projects "Pacer" (up to 1 tons) and "Altius" (up to 5 tons).

Also, the Sukhoi Design Bureau is currently developing a drone drone as part of the Hunter’s R & D project. The project of a heavy unmanned impact aircraft weighing up to 20 tons is being developed in the interests of the Russian Air Force. The work is carried out by Sukhoi. For the first time, the country's Air Force plans to get a drone UAV became known as part of the MAKS-2009 air show. According to Mikhail Pogosyan, the work on the design of a new shock drone should be the first joint work of the Sukhoi Design Bureau and the MiG RSK (previously in the MiG they worked on the Scat project). The official cooperation agreement between the two enterprises was signed in October last year.

The terms of reference for creating a drone UAV was approved by the Russian Defense Ministry at the beginning of April 2012, and in early June, the media reported that it was Sukhoi that was chosen as the lead developer for this project. In addition, an unnamed source in the industry reported that the Sukhoi heavy drone drone could be a 6 generation fighter at the same time. It is assumed that the first tests of the novelty will take place not earlier than 2016 of the year, and it will be possible to adopt it not earlier than 2020 of the year. Presumably, this shock UAV will be performed in a modular scheme, which will make it quite easy to change the payload of the device depending on its task.

Information sources:
-http: //www.odnako.org/blogs/show_29004
-http: //militaryrussia.ru/blog/topic-681.html
-http: //news.rin.ru/news/314926
35 comments
Information
Dear reader, to leave comments on the publication, you must sign in.
  1. +3
    26 September 2013 07: 36
    Yak-130, a ready-made platform for an attack drone, 3 tons of combat load, all you need is a remote control module with EMDS to pair
    1. slacker
      +8
      26 September 2013 08: 45
      ... the St. Petersburg drone, with a maximum take-off mass of 640 kg., is able to reach speeds of up to 210 km / h and fly at altitudes of up to 7500 m. The range of this drone is 3700 km. The Dozor-600 is capable of carrying on board a payload weighing up to 220 kg, continuously being in the sky for up to 30 hours.


      With such an apparatus, it’s time for the Russian military to open the hunting season for Saakashvili! And lay the skin of the obtained animal in front of the entrance to the Ministry of Defense of the Russian Federation instead of a doormat!
      1. +16
        26 September 2013 10: 17
        Quote: Loafer
        With such an apparatus, it’s time for the Russian military to open the hunting season for Saakashvili! And lay the skin of the obtained animal in front of the entrance to the Ministry of Defense of the Russian Federation instead of a doormat!

        And the best way to lure Mishko’s beast is with fresh, juicy ties. smile
    2. +2
      26 September 2013 11: 52
      It’s cheaper and more reliable to create a drone from scratch than to remake something.
    3. 0
      26 September 2013 11: 58
      And now - how much he will be in the air.
      1. +1
        26 September 2013 12: 07
        In the air, it can be much more than a regular plane. I hope it’s clear why.
  2. +4
    26 September 2013 07: 45
    Well done all the same Shoigu, a true leader!
    1. +2
      26 September 2013 11: 59
      What exactly? Populist statements?
      1. +7
        26 September 2013 12: 30
        My friend, if you knew what HAPPENED in the army after the collapse of the USSR (especially in the 90s and under Serdyukov) and what happened HAPPEN now, you would not ask such a question. Believe me.
        1. lucidlook
          +1
          26 September 2013 19: 41
          But then, probably, one should not lose sight of such a fact as, for example, the one on this wonderful prototype of the Russian development for some reason Austrian Rotax-914F engine installed. This is also happening now.
      2. 0
        26 September 2013 23: 53
        Shoigu is a populist? I am pleased with such "Jewish" comments, it means Shoigu is in his place, if he is a "populist", then in the name of Russia, and there are populist journalists on the other side who sleep and see when "reformers" come to power - new Yeltsins, Serdyukovs ...
  3. The comment was deleted.
    1. +6
      26 September 2013 08: 03
      citation-Earlier this company designed and built a single-engine UAV Dozor-600, which in its characteristics is quite comparable to the famous American Predator.



      quote -... work on designing a new strike drone should be the first joint work of the Sukhoi Design Bureau and MiG RSK (previously MiG worked on the Skat project).

  4. 0
    26 September 2013 08: 03
    Quote: saag
    Yak-130, a ready-made platform for an attack drone, 3 tons of combat load, all you need is a remote control module with EMDS to pair

    And also an artificial intelligence system for this module. wink
  5. +3
    26 September 2013 08: 24
    For the UAV future. They do not get tired, they are not afraid of overload, more light. The life of the pilot is not at risk.
    1. +6
      26 September 2013 09: 28
      The future is not only for UAVs, but also for unmanned ground vehicles.
      1. +2
        26 September 2013 10: 08
        Quote: xetai9977
        The future is not only for UAVs, but also for unmanned ground vehicles.




        and this is a US combat drone laughing
        1. +2
          26 September 2013 10: 14
          It seems to me incorrect to compare, the so-called "Scorpion" does not exist at all, and the "mechanical mule" is quite real.
    2. alex popov
      0
      26 September 2013 10: 52
      In the light of your post, a negative opinion of the Pentagon representative about traitors and their organic capabilities, for example, in the field of self-defense, will sound strange.)
      KMK. There is a tool for every business. We need both drones and manned vehicles. Drones will never become a "perfect" weapon, if only because of the eternal struggle of "shield and sword", that is, electronic warfare and self-propelled guns.
      1. +2
        26 September 2013 12: 51
        Is there a "perfect weapon"? There is also a shield for every sword. The only exception is nuclear weapons.
  6. +3
    26 September 2013 08: 34
    Quote: saag
    Yak-130, a ready-made platform for an attack drone, 3 tons of combat load,

    I disagree. Yak-130 is a manned aircraft and its design features are "sharpened" for the presence of a pilot. So, it is better to design a UAV from the outset as an unmanned vehicle, and not rebuild it from an aircraft designed to solve completely different tasks.
  7. 0
    26 September 2013 09: 03
    Quote: VadimL
    Quote: saag
    Yak-130, a ready-made platform for an attack drone, 3 tons of combat load,

    I disagree. Yak-130 is a manned aircraft and its design features are "sharpened" for the presence of a pilot. So, it is better to design a UAV from the outset as an unmanned vehicle, and not rebuild it from an aircraft designed to solve completely different tasks.

    And what is its unsuitability? It has an EMDS, it is practically necessary to coordinate the interfaces and you can control it from anywhere, if you put a satellite station. In a hanging container, you can hang both a thermal imager and video cameras, and even a side-view radar
  8. 0
    26 September 2013 09: 40
    If you show Shoigu a black box with wires to which a shaggy bespectacled man connects an ordinary laptop and say that this is the heart of an impact drone?
    Customizing the developers and the heart is not recommended - this is not a flock of sheep in the pasture.
  9. 0
    26 September 2013 09: 57
    Quote: saag
    And what is its unsuitability? It has an EMDS, it is practically necessary to coordinate the interfaces and you can control it from anywhere, if you put a satellite station. In a hanging container, you can hang both a thermal imager and video cameras, and even a side-view radar

    All this is possible, I do not argue. But is it not better to create a specialized platform that would be less visible and able to stay in the air longer?
    1. 0
      26 September 2013 12: 13
      You are absolutely right, large UAVs, regardless of the destination — an attack or reconnaissance one should be in the air longer, spend energy more economically, and be less noticeable. Otherwise, all this will stand on earth and all the benefits will disappear ...
  10. +1
    26 September 2013 10: 09
    And although today drones are in service with the armies of many states, including Russia, the United States, which, however, is not entirely successful in using them, has the greatest addiction to this type of weapon. Information about civilian casualties in the Middle East as a result of attack drone attacks instead of destroying terrorists has become almost a common thing.

    And like the Americans have to deal, bomb civilians or terrorists. In World War II, they also bombed residential areas of German and Japanese cities. They do not care whom to destroy for their personal interests, manned or unmanned aircraft.
  11. USNik
    0
    26 September 2013 10: 49
    Model of a shock UAV Skat RSK MiG
    Uh, I would have thrown ALL efforts on the site of Mikoyanovtsev to develop \ fine-tuning \ production of precisely large jet UAVs. It’s just that there’s a fierce competition on the market for fighters and attack planes (which is proved by losing xxx in tenders), and in the segment of jet strike UAVs it’s empty!
    1. 0
      26 September 2013 15: 49
      They need to throw their forces into lobbying their programs, although it is probably already useless to be blacks at Sukhoi (Poghosyan)
  12. 0
    26 September 2013 12: 27
    It should be understood that the capabilities and flexibility of the use of shock UAVs in comparison with manned aircraft are generally lower. But there are advantages, a long stay in the air, no danger to the pilot, cheaper production and operation.
    1. 0
      26 September 2013 12: 48
      That's right. Each class of aircraft has its own application, so UAV aerial battles will not be able to lead for a long time.
  13. 0
    26 September 2013 12: 59
    It is high time to speed up the creation of UAVs. But there is a significant drawback, the UAV cannot perform combat and reconnaissance missions in the radio silence mode, which means it is vulnerable to electronic warfare.
    Therefore, together with the UAVs, it is necessary to step up the development of noise immunity technologies for long-distance communications.
  14. 0
    26 September 2013 15: 03
    The Russian army still needs flying robots soldiers, as in the film "Oblivion" and an aircraft carrier for them. They will be able to operate even in the forest.
    1. Turtles
      0
      28 September 2013 14: 58
      And what is already access to alien technology?)))
  15. 0
    26 September 2013 15: 05
    Impact drones in the form in which they now exist are good in driving occupied Papuans in occupied enemy territories (even without army air defense). Ideal for Afghanistan-Iraq-Pakistan. Immediately epic bummer with the country in a stronger way like Iran, not to mention Russia.
    This is the button accordion from Mr. Mishiko's UAV:
    [media = http: //video.bigmir.net/show/225385/]
    Who is going to drive Shoigu drones? Bandyukov in the Russian Federation? With the probability of amer’s mistakes in Afghanistan (reports of attacks on non-combatants from there do not stop)? Well, those, I repeat, are not training on their territory ...
  16. 0
    26 September 2013 16: 11
    Quote: VadimL
    But is it not better to create a specialized platform that would be less visible and able to stay in the air longer?

    This is just for the reconnaissance drone - it’s necessary to hang for a long time and be invisible when the strike is determined, target designation is transmitted to it and it works, why does the strike have to hang for a long time, it will eat fuel, but in general there is such a topic now - barrage ammunition, a kind of disposable drone, in my opinion it is worth a closer look
  17. +3
    26 September 2013 17: 16
    And with the communications in the troops, everything is fine with me, as I understand it? Again we strive to heaven, forgetting about the earth.
  18. lucidlook
    -2
    26 September 2013 19: 32
    I wonder how they are going to use a drone if GLONASS works through a stump deck? Or will they be guided by GPS?
  19. +1
    26 September 2013 19: 42
    The ramp makes a good impression as a serious promising development of the MiG RSK, and it was the unmanned vehicle with all the inherent attributes that was created. You can congratulate the designers in advance on success. If we talk about converting finished aircraft into unmanned, then, of course, the Yak-130 could be an ideal option for such transformations. The problem is that the aircraft is expensive, and few of them are released, it’s not even suitable for its intended purpose. To do this, MiG 21 would be better as the cheapest because of mass production of a fighter.
  20. +2
    26 September 2013 20: 45
    He does it right, we must not lag behind.
  21. kelevra
    0
    26 December 2013 19: 33
    Impact drones are needed! We need to squeeze these developments and begin to compete with the same Israel!