Photo Report from MAX 2013 (Static Exposure)

77
























































































77 comments
Information
Dear reader, to leave comments on the publication, you must sign in.
  1. Tatar
    +20
    29 August 2013 08: 13
    BEAUTY!!!
    1. +11
      29 August 2013 09: 33
      Thank you very much for the photo! Flyers respect.
      The policemen in a new uniform with stripes look like janitors. wassat
      And yet a380 looks ugly, like quality pumped with methane, our beautiful IMHO
      1. Kir
        +1
        29 August 2013 18: 34
        It’s not a fact that the glider wasn’t calculated by us, because there is a design-engineering department in Moscow and it’s just a glider, the information is accurate, because from the person he was invited to work there, but he preferred a Boeing, by the way, also Moscow.
    2. +5
      29 August 2013 15: 37
      Still would have signed photos of who is who, in general it would have been wonderful.
      And the photos are great.
  2. +16
    29 August 2013 08: 14
    Great, interesting photos, is it really difficult to make a signature?
    1. +2
      29 August 2013 14: 13
      By the way, I noticed that Rosoboronexport has no paws at the eagle))
      1. +1
        29 August 2013 14: 56
        Quote: klimpopov
        By the way, I noticed that Rosoboronexport has no paws at the eagle))

        Everything makes sense in heraldry, this probably means that everything tasty (chicken legs) has already been stolen. smile
    2. 0
      30 August 2013 08: 10
      Yes, it would not hurt ... Although, promptly ...
  3. Akim
    +6
    29 August 2013 08: 25
    Maize already two upgrades.
  4. +3
    29 August 2013 08: 26
    And what is this white-green plane with a red horse on the fuselage?
    1. +5
      29 August 2013 08: 42
      This is the newest low-speed landing attack aircraft) First, artillery bombardment with Nursa and then landing and unloading) But seriously ... yes, hell doesn’t sign it)
      1. +2
        29 August 2013 09: 34
        Same thoughts about him arose))
    2. +1
      29 August 2013 09: 52
      it's a trotter. and why did he need to punch the nurses — comments are needed here.
      1. +13
        29 August 2013 10: 00
        In case the civil airfield refuses to land)))
      2. +3
        29 August 2013 10: 41
        Quote: Panikovsky
        it's a trotter. why did he need the nurses spanked

        Probably Tukano laurels do not give rest.
    3. +2
      29 August 2013 12: 21
      called Rysachok. It seems to have been positioned as a civilian, but secondary army signs are evident, more precisely under the belly!
    4. +2
      29 August 2013 18: 22
      The little lynx. Production TsSKB-Progress. Developer-NKF Tekhnoavia. It is being developed to replace the AN-2.
      1. 0
        30 August 2013 11: 05
        The AN-26 that goes for the Army has the same mounts for bombs. High-explosive, so that I would not hang on them, but lighting was used in all (Afghanistan).
        If this aircraft is offered for the Army as well, then fastening for some weapons will not be amiss.
  5. +4
    29 August 2013 08: 35
    Ay beauties! You can watch the Tu-160 for hours ... smile
    1. 0
      30 August 2013 08: 12
      Exactly .... Ah, Atlant commands deep respect ..
  6. +2
    29 August 2013 08: 49
    Now to the troops, so that there would be no less than visitors to the exhibition.
  7. +3
    29 August 2013 09: 07
    The police in the photo are some kind of messed up. What could not be stroked? The head of the unit reprimanded.
    1. +4
      29 August 2013 12: 38
      normal policemen, moderately pozhamkany, moderately hungover. they are not serving in the Kremlin regiment.
      1. +3
        29 August 2013 20: 16
        I’m in the army on the border, where there are no strangers at all, I walked like a parade and the commander would have beaten me in place if I had found him in this form. It is necessary to respect yourself and the authorities do not disgrace.
  8. +6
    29 August 2013 09: 24
    Who would not say that, and our aviation equipment is the MOST BEAUTIFUL and the BEST!
    1. +2
      30 August 2013 08: 14
      Hang whiners and liberals ...
      1. +1
        31 August 2013 16: 03
        and Valeria Ilyinichna Novodvorskaya has no neck, will you order her for the clitoris?
  9. +1
    29 August 2013 09: 25
    sorry, no signatures
  10. Vlad_Mir
    +2
    29 August 2013 09: 49
    It's nice that most of the Russian exposition is in "serial" color.
  11. Vasily79
    0
    29 August 2013 09: 55
    Sorry, but I am enraged by the NATO painting of our technology is not beauty but stealth here is the truth.
  12. +2
    29 August 2013 09: 55
    An-2-100 handsome! Breathed life into the classics!
  13. Zheka Sibiryak
    +4
    29 August 2013 09: 59
    Super!!! Here is a short report from MAKS 2013
    1. +1
      29 August 2013 10: 51
      Airplanes fascinate. Now the weapons complex to match.
    2. 0
      30 August 2013 08: 20
      Swing to the moon! And, that's nice!
  14. +7
    29 August 2013 10: 00
    "Darling", why aren't you in the series yet ...
  15. +2
    29 August 2013 10: 01
    how would "YOU" come in handy now ...
    1. +1
      29 August 2013 10: 02
      but, "An" - no ...
  16. Kovrovsky
    +3
    29 August 2013 10: 03
    There was even a place for the "old man" Tu-95!
    1. 0
      30 August 2013 08: 27
      As it gives, it will not seem a little ... "young" to envy ...
  17. +3
    29 August 2013 10: 12
    With a horse, this is the "Rysachok", so why really why should the strip be leveled before landing? And there are also remotorized An-2 and even L-410, such as light aircraft in the regions, there is something to reanimate, the rollback is probably small, so no one needs it
  18. +1
    29 August 2013 10: 15
    us an air bass if the TU-204 is to us. I envy those who looked at all this beauty there.
  19. Arminian power
    +2
    29 August 2013 10: 32
    krasa nezemnaya
  20. +3
    29 August 2013 10: 35
    Good day! Cool photo story.
    It’s a pity that the pictures are not signed.
    Cool and beautiful technique. Yes
  21. vinnie
    +1
    29 August 2013 10: 50
    Why sign them ??! Everything has long been known ... And "Annushki" (An-2), apparently get a second life ... Great !!! I flew them more than once ...
    1. Htuek
      0
      29 August 2013 18: 55
      Can you say something about IL-114?
    2. Alex 241
      0
      1 September 2013 01: 21
      .........................................
  22. +1
    29 August 2013 10: 55
    photo cool sorry not signed
  23. +2
    29 August 2013 10: 59
    Beauties !!!
  24. +2
    29 August 2013 11: 08
    Just bewitching.
  25. +1
    29 August 2013 11: 10
    Super!!! But what, all the same, the Russian Air Force switched to a new color?
  26. vkrav
    +1
    29 August 2013 12: 09
    Even Tu144 rolled out? 10th photo from the bottom
  27. +4
    29 August 2013 12: 32
    Great report! Personally, I was pleased with the presence of the Tu-204SM, Mi-38 at the exhibition and the modernization of the ageless An-2 ... good
    And the question to the author (or people who know) - and this is also, what kind of beast is so outlandish and what does it eat with? .. wink
    1. +2
      29 August 2013 12: 37
      http://samspace.ru/products/national_economy_products&consumer_goods/rysachok/
      1. +2
        29 August 2013 13: 18
        Thanks for the info! Yes However, in "civilian" he looks much nicer than in camouflage ... wink
    2. +1
      29 August 2013 12: 37
      So I wonder, and "whose will it be? ..."
    3. +1
      29 August 2013 12: 39
      And this ...........
    4. +1
      29 August 2013 12: 40
      and this...............
      1. +1
        29 August 2013 13: 09
        All this, Sergey, is the product of the activities of an effective Pogosyanovsky genius. With all the consequences arising from this fact ... wink
        1. 0
          29 August 2013 22: 50
          Their martial arts are more beautiful, but this "rump" is somehow, here is "Tu" is always different article
  28. +1
    29 August 2013 12: 41
    Ah handsome ........
  29. +2
    29 August 2013 12: 41
    and well done ........
  30. +2
    29 August 2013 13: 18
    Quote: Kovrovsky
    Kovrovsky Today, 10:03
    There was even a place for the "old man" Tu-95!

    =) and for VM-T Myasishchev - beauty and strength!
  31. +1
    29 August 2013 14: 45
    The beauty!!! There are no words !!! And comments too !!!
  32. Horde
    0
    29 August 2013 16: 22
    Yeah not bad! only the vile gray spoils everything, twinks in the old war paint are simply handsome!
    1. Nitup
      0
      29 August 2013 22: 49
      so before there were gray MiGs: MiG-25, MiG-31
  33. 0
    29 August 2013 21: 45
    "Beautiful, scoundrels!"
  34. bubble82009
    0
    29 August 2013 22: 05
    such as little aircraft this year. and the flight program is weak. but you still need to go
  35. 0
    29 August 2013 22: 34
    These L-ki painted under bees are balts as far as I remember ...
  36. 0
    29 August 2013 22: 46
    A good "European", but worse than ours ...
    1. 0
      30 August 2013 08: 29
      I saw his aerobatics in 2004 and 2007 ... weak ...
  37. +2
    29 August 2013 22: 47
    With the world on a thread (ideas) - China fighter ... smile
  38. andru_007
    0
    29 August 2013 22: 47
    They said many times, I'm not afraid to be commonplace, it's just a holiday, just super !!!!!!!!!
  39. +2
    30 August 2013 01: 00
    And yet, the Tu-160 is the most beautiful, majestic. I don’t know, when I see him, everyone else fades. Even PAK FA. This is the king among the planes. Well, I like him and that's it. I'll go tomorrow and look for a model, supposedly for my son. lol
    1. +3
      30 August 2013 08: 32
      Tu-160 Tsar-kings ... Ah, here is a handsome man from this angle ...
    2. -2
      31 August 2013 12: 23
      Max Otto - TU-160. Like most Soviet technology / no matter whether it is peaceful or military / it is absolutely unpresentable specimen. Heavy, heavy, non-aerodynamic / at least it looks like this /. Take, for example, the archaic interlacing of the cockpit canopy. As if straight from the 40s of the last century. Or a huge gargrot - maybe it has a definite function, but again, it reminds of the last century - it's ugly. All from the same line - the tsar bell, the tsar cannon, the fat cow-water carrier "Typhoonsha", aka "Shark" - like the rest of Soviet-made submarines, absolutely not pleasing to the eye with their external contours. And with almost 0 thousand "battleship" tons of displacement missiles carries less than the lighter "Los Angeles". Yes, he, "Los Angeles", and looks like a machine, much more modern, concomitant with our time. However, like the rest of the American ships and aircraft. By the way, about the birds, i.e. airplanes, after all, the conversation is about them. The B 60000B strategic bomber is quite comparable in performance to the White Swan. But the plane is not even from our time, but from the future. The silhouette is aerodynamic, sleek, swift. And the coloring will be more serious.
      1. +2
        31 August 2013 13: 38
        Quote: Linkor200
        Max Otto - TU-160. Like most Soviet technology / no matter-peaceful or military purpose / - absolutely unpresentable instance. Overweight, heavyweight, non-aerodynamic / ......

        Is that why they call him "White Swan"?
        Can you call the Su-27 awkward?
        Quote: Linkor200
        All from the same line - the tsar bell, the tsar cannon, the fat cow - the "Typhoonsha" water carrier, aka "Shark" - like the rest of the Soviet-made submarines, absolutely not pleasing to the eye with their external contours

        The sizes of the Shark dance from the technical project:
        a submarine that carries 20 90-ton missiles cannot be Thumbelina, and its buoyancy margin (four more than that of an American) in order to ensure acceptable draft and thereby ensure its approach to the same berths, where most of our nuclear powered ships moored.

        Quote: Linkor200
        .... However, like the rest of the American ships .......
        Yes, they are like iron compared to our ships of the "stagnation period"

        Quote: Linkor200
        The B 1B strategic bomber is quite comparable in performance to the White Swan. But the plane is not even from our time, but from the future. The silhouette is aerodynamic, sleek, swift. And the coloring will be more serious.

        B-1
        The protruding cockpit remained from the project where the pilots were to eject together with the cockpit. It did not work to realize the bailout in the gland, but the cabin remained. S-shaped air ducts in the engines greatly cut the speed of the aircraft: now it can only go to supersonic for a short time. In the Tu-160, the problem of visibility of turbine blades on the radar was solved differently: the front blades of the compressor reflects the radar irradiation on the walls of the duct, which are made of absorbing materials + the blades themselves have an absorbing coating.
      2. +1
        1 September 2013 01: 05
        Do you evaluate all the equipment from the position of a designer?
      3. +1
        8 September 2013 21: 30
        Envy not so openly ... The beauty of our ships, planes and tanks is envied by many, but you can't stoop to "stupid" "denigration".
        If the B-1B knew how to launch the CR, then a comparison would make sense. And so - these are different weight categories. And one Tu160 with Israel’s strike can equalize Israel with sea level
  40. lucidlook
    +1
    30 August 2013 14: 08
    Well, they would have let the Tu-204SM into the series, who would be bad from this? Ah airbaaaasu, ah importeoooooram ... that’s trouble-trouble-chagrin.
  41. anton197107
    0
    4 September 2013 14: 37
    Yes, and only babble, I want our airborne boards to be larger
  42. 0
    6 September 2013 20: 17
    Quote: Panikovsky
    and Valeria Ilyinichna Novodvorskaya has no neck, will you order her for the clitoris?
    it is obscene and disgusting, please remove, I do not want to be involved in this. admins, please remove. I am ashamed, and I refuse the muck that I blabbed. I am ashamed, and nothing like that, I will not say more.