Military Review

LCAC hovercraft

23
LCAC hovercraft



The hovercraft (Landing Craft Air Cushion, LCAC) is a high-speed landing craft with large landing ships docks. It can carry around 68 tons of payload (up to 75 tons in overloaded condition). The boat is used to transport weapons systems, equipment, cargo and personnel from the ship to the shore or along the coastline. The main advantage of the air-cushion landing craft is that LCACs are able to move through swamps and other coastal obstacles, carrying heavy loads such as the Abrams tank M-1 at high speed and can be equipped for transporting personnel to Quantity to 180 people. The LCAC is capable of performing the task regardless of the depth of the water, underwater obstacles, shoals or adverse tides.



It is able to move on an air cushion, despite obstacles up to one and a half meters in height, and regardless of terrain or topography, including muddy, sand dunes, ditches, swamps, river banks, sleet or slippery and icy coastlines. Equipment such as trucks and tracked vehicles can be unloaded under its own power through the bow and stern ramps, thereby shortening the critical unloading time. Thus, LCAC is able to land troops on 70 percent of the coastline in the world, compared with only 17 percent for conventional amphibious assault ships.



LCACs were designed to meet the need for hovercraft capable of delivering troops, artillery, military equipment, Tanks and other basic elements of military equipment and support equipment on an unprepared shore. These hovercraft are based on a custom-made prototype that underwent comprehensive tests by the U.S. Navy from 1977 to 1981. On June 29, 1987, the LCAC was approved for serial production. In 1989, forty-eight hovercraft landing boats were funded. In 1990, $ 219.3 million was allocated to build another nine boats, in 1991 another 12 LCACs were fully funded. In 1992, 24 boats were funded. As of 2001, the US Navy had delivered 91 LCACs. Boats were manufactured at Textron Marine and Land Systems / Avondale Gulfport Marine. Lockheed shipbuilding company was selected on a competitive basis as the second potential manufacturer. Boats LCAC 1-12, 15-17, 19, 20, 22-26, 28-30, 37-57, 61-91 were built by Textron Marine and Land Systems; 13, 14, 18, 21, 27, 31-33, 34-36, 58-60 Avondale Gulfport Marine.



LCAC tests were conducted in Panama City, Florida. Subsequently, LCAC was tested in California, Australia and in Arctic waters. Tests in Alaska in March 1992 included an assessment of the operational effectiveness of LCAC in arctic conditions. During the tests, it turned out that LCACs were not very effective for conducting operations in the Arctic, and even the use of a special kit for cold weather could not change the situation. Tests have also shown that at low temperatures engine power increases to the limit of the gearbox capabilities, but icing and sea conditions neutralize this advantage. Since then, LCAC has been used in two exercises in the Arctic, one of which included operations at temperatures of minus 10 ° C and difficult weather conditions. Based on these exercises, it was decided that there was no need for further trial operation. LCACs have demonstrated the ability to move on thin ice and open water in a fairly calm sea. The distance traveled per exit varied from 4-x to 16-km in one direction. Icing, which occurs under certain conditions, required a periodic interruption of the mission to remove the ice. When tested in the Arctic, JP-5 fuel was used to alleviate problems with clogged filters. In addition, the LCAC participated in a series of trawling exercises, where it proved to be a potentially effective minesweeper in shallow water.



For the first time, LCAC was deployed in 1987, when amphibious boats with board numbers 02, 03 and 04 were taken aboard USS Germantown (LSD-42). In July, 1987 of the year LCAC 04 overcame Buckner Bay in Okinawa and sounded the first landing of the LCAC in a foreign country. The largest LCAC deployment took place in January 1991, when four squads of eleven boats entered the service in the Persian Gulf to support the operation “Desert Storm”.



Users of air-cushion assault boats note some similarities between the LCAC and the aircraft. The “pilot” of the boat is located in the “cockpit”, wearing a radio headset. He receives instructions from the air traffic control point located next to the stern gates of the ship-dock. During the flight, the crew feels the same feelings as on an airplane with high turbulence. The pilot controls the Y-shaped steering wheel, his legs are on the control pedals, and he "flies like a puck in the air hockey." LCAC is also similar to a helicopter, it has six dimensions of movement.



With such an expensive and inherently dangerous machine as LCAC, sound thinking and making the right decisions play a key role. Concerns about the cost of training, forecasts for an increase in the number of LCACs and their crews, as well as high staff turnover in the training units have led the fleet to realize the importance of developing more accurate methods for selecting candidates. Thus, the turnover of operators and engineers has decreased from the initial level in 40% in the 1988 year to the 10-15% at present.



The LCAC had successful combat experience in Somalia, Bangladesh, Liberia, Haiti and Kuwait. He also provided invaluable assistance during disaster management, including tsunamis and hurricanes.



Thirteen years ago, the US Navy decided to upgrade its air-cushion landing craft and extend their life from 20 to 30 years. The real work began in the 2005 year, and today the 30 airborne amphibious assault ships have been modernized, or they are in full swing (seven LCACs are now undergoing this process). The amount of modernization is about $ 9 million each. Another 72 boats are in operation, ten are in reserve (as a replacement), and two are used for research and development. The whole process will take more than ten years.



In the course of modernization, the engine is replaced (in those cases where it is possible to avoid replacement, it undergoes a major overhaul), structural elements damaged by corrosion are replaced, and new electronics and other accessories are installed.



The C4N system (command, control, communications, computers and navigation) has undergone the modernization process, the LN-66 radars have been replaced with more modern and more powerful P-80 radars. A new open-architecture electronics based on modern commercial equipment provides the fastest integration of accurate navigation systems, new communication systems, etc. The new LED screens and LED keyboards consume less energy than the old cathode ray tubes and light-type indicators, and also generate less heat. In combination with the new air conditioner installed in the command post, this provides the crew of the hovercraft with improved working conditions. In addition, the engines were upgraded to the configuration of ETF-40B, providing extra power and lift (this is especially important at temperatures above 40 degrees Celsius), reduced fuel consumption, reduced service intervals.



Corrosion elements were replaced with newer, more durable, non-freezing materials. The new skirt of an air cushion reduces drag, increases driving performance over water and land, and also facilitates maintenance requirements. After the above procedures and painting, the upgraded boats look like new, but with significant improvements. Upgraded LCACs are easier to maintain, more reliable, and have better performance.



On July 6, 2012, a contract was signed with Textron Inc to develop a replacement approaching the end of its LCAC service life. The new landing craft SSC (Ship-to-Shore Connector) will be an evolutionary replacement for the existing fleet of hovercraft. SSC will enhance the tactical capabilities of over-the-horizon landing aids. They will have increased reliability and maintainability, will reduce the total cost of operation, and will also meet the growing requirements for the payload of the Maritime Expeditionary Battalion-2015 program. The program involves the construction of a total of 73 boats (one for testing and training and 72 for adoption). Deliveries are scheduled for the 2017 fiscal year with the adoption of the 2020 fiscal year.



Performance characteristics:
Length without pad: 24.9 meter
Length with pad: 28 meters
Width without cushion: 14.2 meter
Width with pad: 14.6 meters
Height above the surface with a pillow: 5.8 meter
Height above the surface without a cushion: 7.8 meters
1.5 cushion height meter
Displacement: 88.6 tons empty; 173-185 tons with full load
Power plant: four Avco-Lycoming TF-40B gas turbines (2 for propulsion / 2 for generating lift), each with horsepower 3955
Propellers: 2 four bladed reversible propeller with an adjustable step diameter of 3.58 meter to propel; 4 fan diameter in 1.6 meters, centrifugal or mixed flow to create lift
Fuel capacity: 19,000 liters
Average fuel consumption: 3,700 liters per hour
Full load range: 200 miles at speeds in 40 knots or 300 miles at speeds in 35 knots (on 90 percent fuel)
Speed ​​at full load with sea state in 2 points: 50 knots (92.6 km per hour)
Speed ​​at full load with sea state in 3 points: 35 knots (64.8 km per hour)
Speed ​​at full load on land: 25 knots (46.3 km per hour)
Load capacity: 68 tons (overloaded 75 tons)
Cargo deck: 20х8.2 meters, 168 sq.m
Crew: 5 people
Placement of crew and landing force: on the starboard side on the upper deck the commander, flight engineer, navigator, airborne commander and commander of the landing force, on the lower deck of the 7 paratroopers; on the left side on the upper deck loading specialist, on the lower deck mechanic and 16 paratroopers
Armament: 2 machine gun caliber 12.7 mm; Automatic 40-mm Mk-19 Mod3 grenade launcher; machine gun M-60
Navigation equipment: navigation radar Marconi LN 66 with power 25 kW, I band, satellite and inertial navigation systems
Radio: 2 UHF / VHF radio stations, HFD and portable radio stations



Availability of LCAC per day (out of a total of 54)
Day One - 52
Day Two - 49
Day Three - 46
Day Four - 43
Day Five - 40
Estimated opening hours: 16 hours per day
Exit time when transporting vehicles: 6 hours 8 minutes
Departure time for the carriage of goods: 8 hours 36 min
Number of exits per day when transporting vehicles: 2.6
Total: 104 output LCAC per day when using 40 LCAC
Number of exits per day when shipping goods: 1.86
Total: 74 output LCAC per day when using 40 LCAC
Marines: 145 Marines or 180 Civilians
Motor transport in one exit: 12 HMMWV / 4 BTR / 2 floating BMP / 1 tank M1A1 / 4 M923 / 2 5-ton M923 and 2 M198 and 2 truck
For the landing of the infantry regiment it is necessary:
269 HMMWV - 23 output
10 5-ton trucks - 3 output
For landing a tank battalion:
58 M1A1 - 58 Outputs
95 HMMWV - 8 Outputs
23 5-ton trucks - 6 outlets
8 fuel trucks - 4 output
For the landing of the BTR battalion:
110 BTR - 28 OUT
29 HMMWV - 3 output
23 5-ton trucks - 6 outlets
8 fuel trucks - 4 output

Possibility of basing on ships docks:
Class LSD 41 - 4 LCAC
Class LSD 36 - 3 LCAC
Class LHA 1 - 1 LCAC
Class LHD 1 - 3 LCAC
Class LPD 4 - 1 LCAC


Author:
23 comments
Information
Dear reader, to leave comments on the publication, you must to register.

I have an account? Sign in

  1. Canep
    Canep April 30 2013 08: 30 New
    -6
    Good to you Professor. Experimenting with the names again. For a boat, this ship is too big.
    From the encyclopedia:
    Boat (from the English cutter), a small ship or a warship. K.'s length is from 1,5 to 40 m,width up to 7 mdisplacement from several tens of kg up to 150 m, speed from 3 to 70 knots (5,5-130 km / h). According to the design of the underwater part of the hull K. are divided into keel and flat-bottomed, with redans (ledges) or without them. On the principle of movement distinguish K. displacement, gliding, hovercraft. By the type of engines, engines are divided into steam, engine, gas turbine, and sail-propeller ones; propellers, propellers, water cannons serve as propulsors. In the Navy, K. are used as warships, auxiliary vessels, and basic craft. ....

    The boat is rather this:
    1. Professor
      April 30 2013 08: 45 New
      13
      Experimenting with the names again. For a boat, this ship is too big.

      You will not please. laughing The ship does not suit you - it is weakly armed. The ship was already called with gritting teeth. The boat is 25 meters and there is a boat. In English, there is no problem with the name: the spike is the spike. request
      1. dmitreach
        dmitreach 1 May 2013 18: 55 New
        0
        hi Professor in his own style. Comprehensive information. Thank.
    2. Nayhas
      Nayhas April 30 2013 09: 08 New
      +6
      C'mon, this is nitpicking. For example, the missile KATER pr.1241 has a displacement of 400 tons, but is classified as a boat. Somehow no one is outraged ...
      1. Canep
        Canep April 30 2013 09: 30 New
        0
        They would call the landing barge and everyone is happy. laughing anyway thanks for the article.
        1. bask
          bask April 30 2013 15: 41 New
          +3
          Quote: Canep
          They would call a landing barge and everyone is happy

          These boat-boats, sharpened under a certain doctrine, SySa must land in any part of the world.
          For Russia, I think it’s more important, missile boats and frigates. For the defense of coastline (sea border and economic zones)).
          Quote: Professor
          The ship already called gritting teeth

          The ship pan.prof .., this is the civil name of the ship ... means. Military only ship ....
          In Russia, they make such ships and ships, no worse.
          1. Professor
            April 30 2013 21: 24 New
            +2
            The ship pan.prof .., this is the civil name of the ship ... means. Military only ship ....

            Not everything is a ship that floats. We were taught that an armed vessel is a ship.

            In Russia, they make such ships and ships, no worse.

            And where did I say which is worse?
          2. Argon
            Argon April 30 2013 23: 36 New
            0
            By the way, pan bask, ship, ship, watercraft are completely independent and different terms
          3. svp67
            svp67 1 May 2013 12: 53 New
            +1
            Quote: bask
            These boat-boats, sharpened under a certain doctrine, SySa must land in any part of the world.
            We also have enough seas and oceans, on whose unequipped coast it is urgent to transfer troops, take the same Kuril Islands
    3. Argon
      Argon April 30 2013 23: 32 New
      -1
      come on, good to complain
  2. VohaAhov
    VohaAhov April 30 2013 08: 49 New
    +1
    [quote = Canep] Good Professor to you. Experimenting with the names again. For a boat, this ship is too big.
    From the encyclopedia:
    Boat (from the English cutter), a small ship or a warship. K.'s length is from 1,5 to 40 m,width up to 7 mdisplacement from several tens of kg up to 150 m, speed from 3 to 70 knots (5,5-130 km / h). According to the design of the underwater part of the hull K. are divided into keel and flat-bottomed, with redans (ledges) or without them. On the principle of movement distinguish K. displacement, gliding, hovercraft. By the type of engines, engines are divided into steam, engine, gas turbine, and sail-propeller ones; propellers, propellers, water cannons serve as propulsors. In the Navy, K. are used as warships, auxiliary vessels, and basic craft. ....

    Boats have a displacement of up to 500 tons, then - ships
    1. Bear52
      Bear52 April 30 2013 21: 41 New
      0
      And it won’t work like that? -
      ship - a ship designed for warfare on the sea / body of water. Of course, there are exceptions and reservations - elementary fellow
  3. shurup
    shurup April 30 2013 09: 38 New
    +5
    The developers did not bashfully say that the LCAC during the modernization was equipped with high-capacity latrine, because in real conditions this type of equipment is in high demand with the transported hp. American Marines. The Arctic tests revealed exactly this weakness of the SVP and its icing, which led to the suspension of operation until troubleshooting.
  4. datur
    datur April 30 2013 12: 03 New
    0
    and our BISON is worse_
    1. Die-hard
      Die-hard April 30 2013 12: 43 New
      +2
      Его отсутствием. Полторы штуки у вмф рф на фоне семи десятков lcac`ов у usn это не смешно.
    2. Argon
      Argon April 30 2013 23: 38 New
      -1
      There is one grand minus-about what below
  5. rudolff
    rudolff April 30 2013 13: 13 New
    +5
    I can imagine what kind of hemorrhoids it is, to bring a similar boat (ship, ship, vehicle :) into the dock chamber. Especially if, on the first attempt, the aim was unsuccessful and in the presence of excitement. Stabilizing along the course and along the centerline will be very problematic.
  6. Goryn
    Goryn April 30 2013 13: 46 New
    +1
    Некорректно сравнивать этот корабель с "Зубром" Это средство десантирования с кораблей-доков, а "Зубр"-это что-то автономное и очень дорогое. Я сам житель Балтийска и видел все наши "подушки" выйдут, пошумят, высадят десант в Хмелёвке и вернуться ремонтировать подушку. Да, красиво, но очень дорого. Да и куда они дойдут своим ходом кроме Польши.А она тогда была союзником.
    1. Akim
      Akim April 30 2013 15: 15 New
      0
      Quote: Goryn
      And where they will go under their own power except Poland. And then she was an ally.

      500 nautical miles. Enough and reach Germany and reach Turkey.
      1. Akim
        Akim April 30 2013 22: 07 New
        0

        ФЕОДОСИЙСКИЙ "ЗУБР".
  7. Gromila78
    Gromila78 April 30 2013 14: 18 New
    +3
    During movement, the crew experiences the same sensations as on an airplane with high turbulence.
    Well I do not know. When for the first time we went from the site to the water I felt only a separation from the ground. Half an hour transition no sensations. Shaking with high turbulence was not observed. But the roar from the turbines is remembered for a long time. laughing Служил на "Кальмарах" (проект 1206).
    1. Professor
      April 30 2013 15: 09 New
      -1
      Actually, this is about LCAC.
  8. Tolik. 975
    Tolik. 975 April 30 2013 14: 19 New
    +4
    Thank! article plus. A comprehensive lecture on one of the means of over-the-horizon landing of MP units. And the artillery fire on them (ICE) will be difficult to adjust, and not every anti-ship missile system will be captured, but for AK systems, it’s just the little ones, if you only know where the MAO is planned.
    1. Professor
      April 30 2013 15: 10 New
      +1
      if you only know where the MAO is planned.

      IMHO, the bourgeois will first conduct such air training that there will be no one to shoot at these boats.
      1. Kavtorang
        Kavtorang April 30 2013 16: 44 New
        +4
        Never mind.
        You gave a review, but here, as always, exercises in osllamy from not very forum topic (and not very great mind).
        Вот видите, с "Зубром" померяться пиписками решили. Им картинка "Зубра" доставляет , до оргазма.
        Разумеется они, понятия не имеют, где "Зубр", какие у него задачи и сколько их, "Зубров", вообще в свете белом существует на сегодняшний день.
        But LCAC - fi, not an offset wink
  9. Argon
    Argon 1 May 2013 00: 17 New
    +1
    Ну по сути,если вспомнить основные виды грузообработки то перед нами самоходный лихтер на вп.Надо признать,что в концепцию загоризонтного десантирования его вписали довольно удачно.Для доставки техники,имущества и личного состава на уже захваченный плацдарм-лучше платформы не придумать,а главное применение СНВП в качестве лихтера,невелирует главный недостаток всех судов с динамическими принципами потдержания корпуса-ограниченный радиус действия.Согласен с Rudolff зайти в док-камеру при "боковичке" 8м/сек и более,вопрос не только мастерства но и везения.Поэтому логичным будет наличие какой либо полуавтоматической а может и автоматической системы швартовки (я имею ввиду процесс в целом).
    1. shurup
      shurup 1 May 2013 01: 28 New
      0
      Авианосец ходит либо бейдевинд либо левентик. О какой "боковичке" идёт речь? Два манипулятора с двумя экскаваторщиками при необходимости заменят автоматику.
      1. Argon
        Argon 1 May 2013 02: 25 New
        +2
        Любезный shurup,вы никогда не были в море!Прогулки на катере,летом по Черному морю,это не"в море",это"на курорте".Причем тут авианосцы?Боковичек-боковой ветер.Пожалуйста,относитесь более серьезно к тому,что вы пишете,очень рекомендую чаще ставить знак вопроса.С уважением.
  10. rudolff
    rudolff 1 May 2013 02: 26 New
    +5
    shurup, Вы вероятно парусным спортом занимались, коль такими терминами оперируете. Давайте начнем с того, что курс авианосца относительно направления ветра имеет принципиальное значение только при осуществлении полетов. Во всех остальных случаях, это обыкновенный крупный корабль, без каких-либо дополнительных мореходных ограничений. Во-вторых, УДК все же не авианосец, а вертолетонесущий корабль, а взлет-посадка вертолета с палубы имеют свою специфику отличную от самолетной. И боковой ветер иногда идет на благо, а не во вред. В разумных пределах, конечно. И чем Вам бейдевинд не боковой ветер? Пускай не под прямым углом, но 50-70 градусов относительно курса, все же больше похоже именно на боковой! Да и не всегда проблема именно в направлении ветра. Проблема кораблей на воздушной подушке в их неустойчивости в горизонтальной плоскости и в существенной инерционности при маневрировании. Как-то видел по ящику видео, как подобный катер очень долго и безуспешно пытались загнать в доковую камеру при относительно спокойном волнении. Удивительно как "юбку" еще не порвали! А вот причальных манипуляторов с экскаваторщиками видеть еще не приходилось!
    1. shurup
      shurup 1 May 2013 03: 49 New
      +1
      Do not like the badewind - go fordewind. Or should the UDC according to the charter be on a barrel? In addition to excavators, the manipulator is owned by forestry workers, and not just astronauts.
      The Americans want to take SVP from the board, perhaps by sinking the entire UDC. And SVP does not really land as a helicopter, but as a plane.