BMP-2 with "Berezhok" - one of the best upgrades of the world famous combat vehicle

28
BMP-2 with "Berezhok" - one of the best upgrades of the world famous combat vehicle

For many years, the BMP-2 infantry fighting vehicle was considered one of the best in the world. But as they say, time goes on, and now the beauty and pride of Soviet military industry is already considered obsolete. For a number of characteristics, this machine is significantly inferior to foreign counterparts. So, the BMP-2 firing range at night is 800 m, while most modern tanks and BMPs are equipped with thermal imaging observation devices with a range of at least 2000-2500 m.

Earlier it was noted that the reloading of the anti-tank complex "Competition" is associated with large losses of time and the danger of hitting one of the crew members with shrapnel or gunfire weapons. In addition, there is no possibility to use ATGM in motion.

For a significant increase in the characteristics of the BMP-2, a version of the modernization of the combat compartment has been developed, which has received the designation "Berezhok". In the course of the work produced
replacement of the main units of the fire control system; installation of the modern Kornet anti-tank complex and the automatic Flame-30-mm grenade launcher.

Installing a combined gunner's unified sight allows you to increase the accuracy of firing all types of ammunition, including on the move, and to conduct round-the-clock combat work.

The laser rangefinder is built into the sight, it is also the ATGM guidance device. A digital ballistic computer is also installed with a system of sensors (the angle of inclination of the gun trunnions, the parameters of the atmosphere, the type of projectile, the angular velocity of the target, etc.).

The commander of the car received a panoramic sight. He had the opportunity to duplicate the work of the gunner operator.


In the ammunition of the gun, a new armored-piercing sub-caliber “Trident” projectile was introduced with improved armor penetration characteristics (compared to the armored vehicle) (the effective range of the BTR - 2200 m).

ATGM "Kornet" with a laser-beam semi-automatic guidance system due to higher armor penetration (up to 1200 mm) affects almost all existing tanks, including those equipped with dynamic protection, at a distance of up to 5500 m.

It is installed on a multi-charge launcher that does not require recharging during combat. At the same time, besides increasing the power of the action, the combat rate of fire increases and the danger of the crew’s defeat decreases. Provided shooting volley of two missiles.

As an additional weapon, the 2-mm AG-30 automatic grenade launcher was included in the upgraded BMP-17. A vertical stabilized installation with an armored magazine on an 250-300 grenade is located on the back of the tower.

The use of a grenade launcher in combat, including firing on the move, makes it possible to successfully combat manpower in the trenches, in the folds of the terrain, and behind obstacles at a distance of 1700 meters.

As a result, combat effectiveness in comparison with the standard version increases 3,2 times.


At present, this modernization option is of great interest in international arms markets. So the Algerian armed forces modernized their BMP-2. It is expected that orders from other states will be received.
28 comments
Information
Dear reader, to leave comments on the publication, you must sign in.
  1. 0
    April 11 2013 08: 38
    Good to work, I hope this is true and our equipment will be modernized soon.
  2. Alexey Prikazchikov
    -9
    April 11 2013 08: 50
    The Czechs did a much better job and they don’t shout that they offered the best option, but ours, as usual, make artisanal work for some achievement.
    1. -1
      April 11 2013 11: 24
      I agree. When I look at the Tu-95 ..... tears roll ... But I understand that there is no choice. So it’s very EXPENSIVE !!! And here, they make candy from cheap shit, and they present it to us as a super achievement. Would cease to be dishonored by such news.
      1. Zynaps
        +5
        April 11 2013 17: 20
        Quote: Yarik
        And here, from cheap shit, they make candy, and they present it to us as a super achievement. Would cease to be dishonored by such news.


        Is that brain fury? would cease to be dishonored by such illiterate cries. in today's world, the modernization of armored vehicles is a normal and cost-effective way. all over the world, even very rich countries, are engaged in modernization. modernization does not mean refusing to develop a new one, but if a technique has a modernization potential, not using it is real stupidity. or really want to get into a situation where guns will be produced instead of oil? teens are such teens ...
    2. -4
      April 11 2013 11: 54
      Pruflink to studio tovarisch!
      1. Alexey Prikazchikov
        +1
        April 11 2013 12: 15
        Read

        http://www.dogswar.ru/forum/viewtopic.php?f=7&p=8131#p8123


        http://andrei-bt.livejournal.com/153248.html
  3. +2
    April 11 2013 09: 10
    Still a modular hinged add. protection on him, which can be set - to remove depending on the tasks and conditions - he would not have a price !!!
  4. 0
    April 11 2013 11: 17
    It’s good that old equipment is being modernized (from the point of view of the state, this is a saving on improving the combat qualities of equipment), but still it’s not necessary to stand still, but we need to develop new equipment with improved weapons and armor!
    1. +4
      April 11 2013 14: 13
      Modernization of old equipment for other states only, about Russia in the article is not a word.
      1. Zynaps
        +5
        April 11 2013 17: 24
        tell tales to your children. if there are no children, tell them to sperm. go to the armored site of Vasily Chobitka and they will explain to you there how it is with other states. modernization of old equipment is a huge market for services. They are modernizing everything, including the MiG-21 and T-54/55. he who does not want to engage in modernization will eat kui instead of oil. for a great war in the world is not yet in sight, and in conflicts of low intensity one can also use shamanistic technique.
  5. Durant
    +3
    April 11 2013 11: 59
    until protection against small arms is strengthened and protection against at least grenade launchers of the first generations is established, there is not much sense in such modernization ...
  6. +3
    April 11 2013 12: 14
    I don’t understand one thing, where is the DZ complex?
    why in the western MRIs there are anti-cumulative gratings and hinged screens.
    we have all the panzer nets hang up. yes bags with zip and sand.
    well, at least they put the AGS in automatically (a cool thing, for those who understand)

    and I'm a supporter of BMPT
    Look how the brothers fooled

    http://weaponscollection.com/18/1917-tyazhelyy-bmp-bmpt-ukrainskogo-proizvodstva
    .html


    our patchchima would also not be patched on base 72 either.
    Of course, I understand that it’s expensive to rebuild the production,
    but it’s painful to look at our behi, disarmed by explosions.


    Request for readers, explain (preferably on the fingers) how to make links clickable.
    1. 0
      April 11 2013 15: 30
      Here is the article. There is an answer why not the T-72. And what is the main military doctrine of our army. I do not deny that BMPT is needed in the army but not for replacement.
      http://topwar.ru/26033-horosho-li-zabyto-straroe-chtoby-stat-novym.html
      1. 0
        April 11 2013 17: 42
        I read both articles of the specified author, and still remain with my own.
    2. Zynaps
      +1
      April 11 2013 17: 29
      Quote: Rider
      why in the western MRIs there are anti-cumulative gratings and hinged screens. we have all the panzer nets hang up. yes bags with zip and sand.


      dadadadadad! Someone badly watches reports from Afgan, in which they show "strikers" covered with all sorts of shit. there are armor nets, and sandbags, and one hell knows what, and on military forums they cry that because of the rubble of shit on the armor, the overconsumption of fuel is hellish, like other consequences of overloading equipment.
      1. +3
        April 11 2013 17: 47
        SW COMPONENT
        if comparative figures were given for the losses of our bechs and bets, and the bourgeois MPEs, I could ARGUENTLY explain to you that the survival rate of the crew and the landing force is higher for the enemy.
        but alas, there are no such numbers.

        so just take a word (or ask those who are in the know)
        our infantry does not have much chance of surviving a defeat of its iron horse.
  7. +3
    April 11 2013 13: 28
    The device is decent --- but now look at how it will pass the tender which was announced by the Ministry of Defense of the Russian Federation.
  8. Vovka levka
    +2
    April 11 2013 14: 27
    The lack of curtain screens, how to explain this?
    Back in 1945, tankers made home-made against the Faustpatrons. I do not understand.
  9. NAPOLEON
    +1
    April 11 2013 14: 48
    BMP-2 there is nothing to upgrade their time to change the truth is nothing.
  10. Rim-roev
    +1
    April 11 2013 15: 19
    BMP is a very good car, although outdated.
  11. +2
    April 11 2013 15: 40
    According to the logic of some of the current inhabitants on the VAZ-21063, to put DZ and grilles, then it will quite fit for the BMPT)))) and all the infantry in the trunk. In his opinion, the BMP-2 "Berezhok" fully fulfills the requirements given to him by the military doctrine of Russia, i.e. be mobile and move behind the tanks in the open field, which is Russia, and knock out the enemy's transport for which the time of the tank is not spent, for example, all kinds of HAMERA.
  12. 0
    April 11 2013 19: 24
    There is no aisle upgrade, tuning for the military is a favorite thing.
  13. +1
    April 11 2013 19: 39
    Definitely BMP 2 the car is good, but it is time to change it. However, while a sufficient number of BMPs are in service, why not upgrade them?
  14. yurik
    -2
    April 11 2013 21: 10
    Mass Infantry Grave! as a combat unit, it sucks and crap. the sides and sterns are pierced by armor-piercing bullets, it burns like a match, a hit from an RPG takes almost the entire crew and troops into the grave. A pitiful disgrace in which the designers have saved on the lives of soldiers. Above there is an article about these iron coffins, in which everything is clearly told what kind of "military" technique is
    1. 0
      April 11 2013 21: 19
      Quote: yurik
      AK combat unit sucks and trash

      You here, to learn the mat part.
      Quote: yurik
      at the top there is an article about these iron coffins,

      if you are talking about this, then you should re-read it carefully)))
      1. bask
        0
        April 11 2013 22: 26
        Quote: Kars
        You here, to learn the mat part.

        And, that he is right to learn. It burns like a match. But it is necessary to upgrade the BMP-1,2. This is primarily an increase in mine resistance. About the Afghan version of the BMP-2D
        BMP-2D infantry fighting vehicle BMP-2D infantry fighting vehicle was developed in 1981 on the basis of data obtained during the hostilities in the Republic of Afghanistan. Serially produced since 1982. It differs from BMP-2 in the presence of additional reservation - steel side screens and an armor plate under the workplaces of the commander and driver are installed to protect the crew and the landing. Due to this, the machine lost its buoyancy. The main armament of the BMP-2 is the 30A 2A42 automatic gun mounted in a double rotating turret. A machine gun of 7,62 mm caliber is paired with a cannon. On the roof of the tower between the hatches of the commander and gunner placed launcher 9P135M (9P135M-1). Thus, the armament installed in the machine allows you to fight against various targets, including tanks and combat helicopters. The BMP-2 chassis is similar in design and technical characteristics to the BMP-1 chassis. The combat crew of the machine consists of 10 people: a non-dismounted part (crew) of 3 people (the commander of the machine, he is also the squad leader, gunner and driver) and 7 riflemen. The latter can conduct targeted fire from personal weapons through special loopholes. The control compartment is located on the left front of the machine. It contains the workplace of the driver, equipped with controls for the movement of the machine, instrumentation, surveillance devices, communication equipment (apparatus A-3 tank intercom - TPU). Behind the driver's seat is the workplace of one shooter. It is equipped with an embrasure for firing from personal weapons (on the left side of the hull), monitoring devices TNP-165A and TNPO-170A, as well as the A-3 TPU apparatus. The main tactical and technical characteristics of the infantry fighting vehicle BMP-2 Weight in combat equipment, tons 14 Battle crew (crew + landing), people 3 + 7 Length, m 6,710 Width, m 3,090 Full height, m ​​2,060 Main armament: make, type, caliber 2A42, automatic gun, 30 mm Auxiliary armament: type, caliber coaxial machine gun, 7,62 mm Additional armament ATGM 9P135M (9P135M -1) Ammunition for the gun, rounds of 500 Ammunition for the machine gun, cartridges 2000 Ammunition PTRK, pcs. 4 Maximum speed, km / h 65 Cruising range, km 500 Diesel engine UTD-2001 Engine power, kW 210-221 Simple mechanical transmission. Despite this upgrade, mine protection remained unsatisfactory.
        [media=http://www.perunica.ru/uploads/posts/2011-08/1312477950_0_41641_6ac7c14d_
        xl.jpg]
  15. bask
    +1
    April 11 2013 22: 34
    [quote = bask] [quote = Kars] You are here to learn the mat part. [/ quote]
    And, that he is right to learn. It burns like a match. But it is necessary to upgrade the BMP-1,2. This is primarily an increase in mine resistance. About the Afghan version of the BMP-2D
    BMP-2D infantry fighting vehicle BMP-2D infantry fighting vehicle was developed in 1981 on the basis of data obtained during the hostilities in the Republic of Afghanistan. Serially produced since 1982. It differs from BMP-2 in the presence of additional reservation - steel side screens and an armor plate under the workplaces of the commander and driver are installed to protect the crew and the landing. Due to this, the machine lost its buoyancy. The main armament of the BMP-2 is the 30A 2A42 automatic gun mounted in a double rotating turret. A machine gun of 7,62 mm caliber is paired with a cannon. Thus, the armament installed in the machine allows you to fight against various targets, including tanks and combat helicopters. The BMP-2 chassis is similar in design and technical characteristics to the BMP-1 chassis. The combat crew of the machine consists of 10 people: a non-dismounted part (crew) of 3 people (the commander of the machine, he is also the squad leader, gunner and driver) and 7 riflemen. BMP-2 D, was used until the withdrawal of Soviet troops from Afghanistan. But it was not possible to drastically improve the security of the machine.
    1. bask
      0
      April 11 2013 22: 55
      Another one of the options for modernization proposed. Czechs and Slovaks. BMP-M2 CZ, increase BMP height, double anti-mine bottom. The combat module is better not habitable. ((Saving space in the BMP)))) The mass of the machine will increase. This will require reinforcement, the chassis. And the rejection of buoyancy.

    2. bask
      0
      April 11 2013 23: 06
      As one of the types of modernization of the BMP-2. Variant, G.Sh. GM-123 armored hull. ((GMZ-3 minelayer)
      1. bask
        0
        April 11 2013 23: 25
        Interesting info. Marines, Casp. Flotillas on BMP, MT-LB, production, Murom plant.
  16. 0
    April 24 2013 15: 01
    "In connection with this, the car has lost its buoyancy." Who told you that the BMP-2 does not float? Even as it floats. As for the modernization ... The new MSA - 5, AGS - 4. It is necessary to provide for the possibility of using the AGS separately from the vehicle, as it used to be with the ATGM launcher. ATGM on external sling - 3 s "-" or 2 s "+". One machine-gun burst of the enemy and you don't have to shoot at tanks. The main problem of the BMP-2 is the cannon. You load longer than you shoot. Very "delicate" filling of the butt plate of the gun. Frequent delays. With very intense shooting, the exhaust fans cannot cope with the powder gases. One big plus is that only a deadly blind soldier can miss the target from this gun at a distance of up to 1500 meters. If the sight was refusal, they shot while observing the triplexes and hit even at night. The UTD20S engine is repaired on the knee.












    2