Fighting robot for the army of Russia. On video and in life

122
Fighting robot for the army of Russia. On video and in life

Not so long ago, a ten-minute animated video began to circulate on the Internet, demonstrating the capabilities of a certain combat Robot. It tells how a formation of three remote-controlled vehicles breaks through enemy positions and takes out the wounded, destroying several enemy along the way. tanks and helicopters. Comments on the video immediately divided into three conditional groups. Proponents of the first opinion expressed themselves in an envious vein, wishing that such a technique was in service with our army. Other commentators criticized the technical aspects of the project, appealing to its various features, as well as considering the possibilities of such a technique if it existed not only in the form of a “hero” of the video. Finally, the third group of speakers, as always, began to blame the project, and at the same time its authors and the military, for the uselessness and excessive spending of money. The third opinion can not be considered - as it soon became known, the video was created at the initiative of the authors of the project and does not claim to be realistic. Its main purpose is to demonstrate the ideas embodied in the project.

As it turned out later, a remotely controlled mobile robot (this is what the machine is currently called) is the subject of a patent owned by a certain D.K. Semenov. Soon the text of the patent application was also discovered, from which it is possible to extract quite interesting information about constructive and conceptual decisions. The project involves the creation of a self-propelled light-armored remotely controlled vehicle capable of performing various combat missions, from reconnaissance to attacking enemy positions. This is due to the specific appearance of the robot - a relatively small armored body with a multi-wheeled chassis and a developed weapon system.





To protect against the bullets and fragments of enemy shells, a mobile robot is supposed to be equipped with ceramic armor. A large number of relatively small tiles will allow you to protect the entire complex-shaped hull with great efficiency. Inside the armored hull is placed the power plant (gasoline or diesel engine), electric current generator, battery, control systems, as well as ammunition. According to the text of the patent application, the prospective robot must move using six motor-wheels. Each of them should be located on a damping column with a swivel mechanism. Thus, all six wheels of the vehicle can rotate around a vertical axis and due to this they can be used for taxiing. As for the use of electric motors placed inside the wheels, this design allows you to remove transmission mechanisms from the design and thereby save a sufficiently large volume inside the armored hull.



On the roof of the robot case, the author of the project proposes to mount a swivel tower for barreled weapons. For guidance, it can be equipped with high torque electric motors. With the receiver systems associated sighting video camera. A few more cameras are supposed to be installed on the case in such a way that they provide all-round visibility. To protect the cameras from damage, Semenov proposes to use two technical solutions at once. Firstly, all the optics of the robot must be covered by armor with movable shutters, and secondly, in case of damage, the robot is equipped with a special system for replacing broken glass and spare units of the latter. As an additional means of detecting the enemy, the prospective robot can also use a microphone system with a circular "review". It is assumed that the use of such a complex system of touch devices will help to increase the probability of detecting the enemy and give the robot certain advantages.

The greatest interest in the proposed project is its armament complex. On the roof of the body of the robot there is a seat for a tower with receiver arms. The latter consists of two rifle-caliber machine guns (FCT or any other with similar weight and size parameters) and one original automatic grenade launcher. As you can see from the video, all three weapons are assembled into a single package and are aimed simultaneously. To aim them, the unit is equipped with an additional optical system. The robot's automatic grenade launcher is a cannon system using original ammunition. D. Semenov proposes to use spherical garnets made in a layered pattern. The outer layer of such a ball can be made of fluoroplastic or any other durable plastic, under it is a spherical fragmentation shirt made of metal, and in the very center of the grenade there is an explosive charge and a fuse. In the future, such a system will make it possible to create not only fragmentation grenades, but also ammunition for other purposes: smoke, lighting, etc. Shooting grenades made using the stock of compressed air.



The machine guns and the grenade launcher of the robot are designed to fire at manpower and unarmored enemy vehicles. To combat more serious targets, such as armored vehicles, a remote-controlled vehicle must be equipped with armor-piercing weapons. Shots for hand-held anti-tank grenade launchers are offered as ammunition. For them, a special package of guides for 6-7 shots is provided in the back of the robot. In the firing position, it extends over the body of the robot using a special telescopic structure. Horizontal guidance is performed by turning the whole robot, vertically - by tilting the package of guides. The calculation of the trajectory and aiming is obviously assigned to the electronics of the robot. In the stowed position, the package of guides is placed inside the hull, while it can be recharged. To do this, inside the armored hull placed a number of grenade launchers, if necessary, served in the guides.

It is argued that the robot electronics can independently detect attacking objects and fire them. At the same time, the signatures of objects that cannot be attacked are stored in the memory of the hardware-software complex — friendly soldiers and equipment or civilians. Algorithms for identifying the environment have not yet been published and may not yet have been created. Signals about the state of the systems, as well as video from surveillance cameras located on the combat vehicle, are transmitted to the robot control panel. Due to this, the operator can receive a large amount of data regarding the situation and act accordingly.

The video shows a sanitary modification of a remote-controlled robot. It differs from the “base” model by the presence of a special evacuation module. At the bottom of such a robot is a collapsible design, which, if necessary, extends and forms a rectangular box with an additional pair of wheels. A wounded person may be transported inside this unit. Details of the design and layout of this version of the robot were not published. Obviously, the presence of an evacuation module reduces ammunition or in some other way changes the location of the units inside the armored hull.



On the available video promising combat robots demonstrate the highest potential. Without any outside help, they shoot tanks, shoot down helicopters and destroy the mass of enemy manpower. It is not difficult to guess that in real conditions everything will be much more complicated. It is worth noting that no one is even thinking about sending such vehicles into battle. The fact is that at the moment, the Semenov construction robot is only a collection of ideas and ideas, but no more. With all the pros and cons, this concept is still too raw for real use. Nevertheless, a number of ideas worth attention.

The proposed system with electric wheels looks somewhat complicated, but interesting. In some circumstances, powering the motors from the battery can help the combat robot to secretly reach the position. At the same time, a rather heavy car will require a powerful battery, the exact parameters of which are currently impossible to calculate due to the lack of complete information. Some issues are caused by ceramic reservation. Corundum or carbide tiles provide a good level of protection, but after the first few hits, they fall into shards. Thus, after each battle, the repairmen will have to not only straighten the metal case and paint the marks from the bullets, but also change dozens of ceramic tiles.

The proposal for a sensory system is also original and interesting. However, the set of cameras and microphones has several serious drawbacks. First, the transmission of several video signals will require a wide communication channel, subject to the effects of electronic warfare. Secondly, it will be necessary to create a simple, but effective and technological system for the replacement of triplexes. Without it, the cameras risk becoming a real expendable material. Finally, even without damage, the cameras are one of the most expensive elements of the whole structure.

As for the original pneumatic grenade, this idea does not look justified. There are already quite a few automatic grenade launchers and the creation of another one hardly makes sense. The only advantage of the idea proposed by Semenov concerns the possibility of using several types of ammunition. However, fine-tuning a pneumatic implement and the subsequent deployment of mass production can be much more difficult than the simple revision of existing structures with the addition of selective power. Machine guns at the same time are fully justified and appropriate to the type of weapons. The only question for them is the number of cartridges transported.



A batch launcher for grenade launchers may have some promise. With an appropriate weapon control system, such a unit can be used even on less developed in terms of electronics combat vehicles. Moreover, the package guide can be useful without the use of a recharge system. At the same time, some doubts are caused by the accuracy of shooting from such weaponsbut it will most likely be no lower than that of hand-held anti-tank grenade launchers. A good advantage of the proposed Semenov anti-tank system is ammunition. The use of unguided grenade rounds significantly reduces the cost of operating a combat robot, although it is not capable of ensuring combat effectiveness at the level of modern anti-tank missile systems. In the future, a remotely controlled combat vehicle can be equipped with guided anti-tank missiles, but such re-equipment will significantly reduce the ammunition, and in addition will seriously change the economic side of its operation.

In general, the project of a remotely controlled combat robot of a design by D. Semenov is quite interesting. There are several original and promising solutions. At the same time, it is unlikely that in the near future at least a prototype of a new combat vehicle will be made. Original solutions led to a too high degree of novelty, which will necessarily alienate potential customers. In the current state, the beginning of the design work on the new project will lead, at most, to the creation of a prototype for running in technologies. The serial and commercial prospects of such a robot, in turn, are small and foggy. Because of the many original solutions, such a combat robot will be very expensive, and its combat effectiveness will continue to be a subject of controversy for a long time. And controversial projects, as is known, rarely become successful and famous.


Patent text: http://findpatent.ru/patent/247/2473863.html
122 comments
Information
Dear reader, to leave comments on the publication, you must sign in.
  1. +25
    27 February 2013 07: 37
    The topic is not new, but execution, plus a test video in the topic - shows the real possibilities of a hypothetical robot. I think we need to tackle this topic more closely, progress is taking leaps and bounds, as if not to be in the role of catching up again ....
    1. w.ebdo.g
      +1
      27 February 2013 09: 07
      very interesting design.
      a lockable bore, a pneumatic (silent) grenade ejection system, almost all weapons inside a sturdy building, but the wounded evacuation system was more pleased - a very good idea! the chances of survival are much greater!
      now, if a (tactical) robot was accessible to a slightly wounded soldier, then in general it’s good ...

      I think so.

      photo of an english robot (old)
      1. +23
        27 February 2013 09: 45
        In the photo captured German self-propelled guided mines "Goliath"
        1. +5
          27 February 2013 13: 07
          now, if a (tactical) robot was accessible to a slightly wounded soldier, then in general it’s good ...

          I think that it’s not worth it, a fighter can disconnect from blood loss, and besides, why does he need excessive body movements?
      2. +2
        27 February 2013 18: 31
        I think this evacuation system can also be used for ordinary logistics - the delivery of ammunition supplies and spare parts.
        Therefore, it is not necessary to equip them only with sanitary robots - but all.
  2. +1
    27 February 2013 07: 51
    the only thing that always worries me when creating and using drones is the moral component. When he is sent on a mission he will not be who is in front of him a child or a soldier, a temple or a barracks. Even Luftwaffe pilots did not always bomb temples and civilians, despite the inhumanity of that war.
    1. +1
      27 February 2013 09: 55
      Robots do not yet have a normal AI, many people control it.
    2. Kir
      +2
      27 February 2013 17: 11
      Well, with regards to the moral side. so here it seems like each country has its own specifics, we have one amers other, etc., etc. with regards to the Luftwaffe, so it seems that at the initial stage of the invasion, part of them and those who jumped with a parachute did not shoot, but so far they did not have serious opposition. but then what were the atrocities, the more you don’t have to mix Asov and ordinary warriors, let alone punitive units.
    3. Avenger711
      0
      2 March 2013 20: 05
      Self-opening fire robots do not exist and it is not known when they will appear.
  3. +2
    27 February 2013 07: 55
    If this robot appears in the Russian army, it will be a leap forward!
    Mighty thing, and most importantly, it’s not the people who fight and die but the pieces of iron!
    1. Icarus
      +2
      27 February 2013 08: 31
      sablezub81,
      Of course, a leap, but do not forget that a person is "higher" than machines, ie. man can act with reflexes and sometimes instincts, but machines cannot.
      1. +1
        27 February 2013 13: 07
        AI will come in handy when approaching the war zone. Himself taxis through the ruins or blockages, and a person monitors the space for ambushes and other surprises.
      2. Old skeptic
        +7
        27 February 2013 18: 18
        Quote: Icarus
        a person can act with reflexes and sometimes instincts, but a machine cannot


        This is where you are wrong. From the course of biology, "Reflex is the body's response to a stimulus", "Instinct is a set of reflexes." Those. reflexes and instincts at the animal level are relatively easy to program (flash on the right, flash on the left), especially to return fire, when the enemy clearly positions itself with a flash and the sound of a shot, the machine can respond purely reflexively, (although it is not so easy to distinguish its own, but the dog also bites his master in the heat of a fight). Such machines can be effectively used with the algorithm "there are no friends here" or "people from behind" and everyone who is not behind, including those who are overly hasty, will be killed.

        It is much more difficult to teach a machine to recognize complex tactical conditions and images: its own, aliens, civilians, equipment (living, wrecked), buildings, etc. and act according to the setting. This is where a man is needed, but .... being outside the battlefield and not being guided by his own senses, a person can often be disoriented, here we need an original interaction protocol, something like BP. And now all control systems are reduced to video games, with joysticks.

        In general, with combat robots there are more questions than answers. And it’s not enough to create a good platform, it still needs to be sensibly tied to a person, because AI will not appear soon.
        1. 0
          2 March 2013 00: 40
          Old skeptic, why do you break off and keep dreaming? "sensibly tie to the brow" - again the same problem - all problems in a "robot-human" relationship are reduced to the problem of data input-output. It is simpler - for the robot to be an effective assistant, it needs to be taught the human language - for a person this is the most convenient way of "data entry". But human language, replete with synonyms-homonyms, elements of abstraction and other neologisms, as well as widely using contextual information, especially in the current situation, can only be understood by the same person, for a robot human speech has not yet been taken Olympus. And that's just one problem!
          You have made it very clear that another problem is the recognition problem. Although technologies in this matter have seriously advanced, because vending machines have appeared, where you can not just stick a candy wrapper, the bill recognition system works fine there, nevertheless, everything is very far from recognizing situations, your fighters from strangers. "to act in a peculiar way" is a somewhat different no less complex theory, the so-called decision-making theory. It is related to the theory of recognition - in recognition, in essence, a decision is made to which class the pattern to be recognized belongs to, but there are some peculiarities.
          No, full robots are still far away. But such assistants to the tank can be done now. I can assume that in this case the very nature of the war will change. Sending a living brow with a grenade launcher against such a tank is nonsense, even Arab terrorists will quickly understand. The main destroyer of such weapons will be a hacker with cryptographic training, armed with the necessary equipment with electronic warfare. Accordingly, the same hacker from the other side will oppose him. And this weapon will be improved - I mean electronic warfare. And former gamers can become the best tankers, but they will not be wearing helmets and breeches, they will hardly have broad shoulders, and they may well have a mom as a teacher and dad as a pianist. These are the fighters of the future and these will be the wars. That's why I communicate here, I know that I communicate with endangered dinosaurs - brutal officers and soldiers. They will not be soon, they will become nonsense in the Army-))))
          1. Old skeptic
            -1
            3 March 2013 01: 10
            Quote: aksakal
            "sensibly tie to the brow" - again the same problem - all problems in a "robot-human" relationship are reduced to the problem of data input-output.


            Who said it was easy? It is not so difficult to control, my son handles the flight simulator like that, and there are more commands than you need. Combat command language can contain no more than 30 commands, that's enough, but feeling the battlefield is a completely different problem. A person has a fairly wide field of view "almost the entire front hemisphere", we are well oriented by sound (the car too, but it does not make tactical decisions). In my opinion, such a robot should work according to the principle "a mechanic commander (man) - and a maniac shooter (machine)". The task of a person is to skillfully drive the car across the battlefield and "shut up the shooter" in time, so that he does not shoot too much or give out with fire ahead of time.
            where you can’t just put a candy wrapper, a system for recognizing banknotes
            And the reading beam will give out the car.

            At the expense of recognition there are thoughts: ..........

            Sorry, I started to write this part of the post and realized that the thoughts are quite sound, so do not voice them .....
    2. +1
      27 February 2013 11: 07
      So far, you can see cool cartoon ala hollywood.
      The layout is doubtful ... Although, what sizes will be and what kind of armor: well, if the protection can withstand heavy machine guns, then the norms.
    3. +8
      27 February 2013 13: 49
      The Russians have always been ahead in terms of AI and are unlikely to ever give up the palm. I think that if a combat manipulator appears in the troops, it will be truly breakthrough in all respects. How long did it take for the Amep to realize the Buran's capabilities at home? Now the PAK FA, although it has not yet entered the series, has already left behind the f-22 "komaroshlёpa" in almost all parameters. And this is not on native engines! My son is an aircraft designer and he calls Raptor - an expensive flying frying pan with decrepit Teflon coating, which Americans are afraid to show to the world so as not to disgrace themselves.
      As Rogozin used to say in an interview with Ekho Moskvy: “In three years the world will see such breakthrough things in our armament that no one even thought about.” While everything is hidden behind a wall of secrecy. Let's wait a bit.
      1. +3
        27 February 2013 13: 54
        We would at least equip all the sapper units with remotely controlled robotic manipulators. What kind of devices are there with AI.

        Ideas also need to be implemented, and here we have problems.
        1. 570
          570
          0
          24 March 2013 00: 45
          I completely agree, from practice, the main losses were during sweeps. launch such an installation at least without weapons, but with a manipulator in front of the advanced detachment at a distance of 50-100 meters.
      2. 0
        27 February 2013 15: 18
        As Rogozin used to say in an interview with Ekho Moskvy: “In three years the world will see such breakthrough things in our armament that no one even thought about.” While everything is hidden behind a wall of secrecy. Let's wait a bit.

        And by the 80th year, communism will be built, and by the 2000th, each family will be provided with a separate apartment. The main thing is to wait. wink
        1. Dima67
          +4
          27 February 2013 16: 05
          Professor,
          And by the 80th year, communism will be built, and by the 2000th, each family will be provided with a separate apartment. The main thing is to wait.
          Life will show. Every day is not Sunday.
          1. +1
            27 February 2013 16: 33
            I forgot about something fresh: a doubling of GDP by 2010. laughing
            Hope dies last.
            1. +1
              27 February 2013 16: 52
              Professor,
              Hope dies last.
            2. 0
              27 February 2013 23: 28
              Quote: professor
              I forgot about something fresh: a doubling of GDP by 2010.

              Why are you giggling? Real GDP grew 1,6 times. If not for the global crisis in 2008, it could have happened.
              1. +2
                28 February 2013 08: 36
                I "giggle" at the naivety of citizens, but at the expense of the crisis, I remember someone to the whole world said about "quiet havana" laughing
            3. Director
              -5
              28 February 2013 09: 36
              KYSH. Heb KYSH from here, fly yourself further.
            4. Avenger711
              0
              2 March 2013 20: 08
              Everything was exactly calculated there, if it weren’t for the crisis, then they would come out just + 100%.
      3. 0
        27 February 2013 16: 18
        Would not be deceived with expectations)))
  4. +20
    27 February 2013 08: 20
    Strange, but on the sketches of the cars in the tower there are no machine guns ...
    I watched the video several times already - damn it, it's cool. In addition to the capabilities of the devices, it was pleased that the streets of the city clearly indicate the country of hostilities - everything is so large-scale, spacious - in American style ... good
    1. M. Peter
      +4
      27 February 2013 09: 05
      In the video, most likely the UK. smile
      But also good .. winked
      1. +2
        27 February 2013 10: 22
        On the video of the USA, there are just a lot of European cars on the streets. It is not clear what the Apaches shot down and hollowed the Abrams. Are there only grenade launchers?
        1. +4
          27 February 2013 11: 23
          Caps, bonus endless ammunition. To a real model like to heaven, with such a reservation and a variety of ammunition + all kinds of electronic guidance systems, an operator with faceted eyes (too many cameras in the cartoon), the size will be slightly smaller than the BMD. The chassis is cool, the idea is right, right, but the performance will be very different.
        2. +1
          27 February 2013 21: 06
          Quote: fzr1000
          Am only grenade launchers?

          Can read the article carefully? It says:
          To deal with more serious goals, for example, with armored vehicles, a remotely controlled vehicle must be equipped with armor-piercing weapons. As ammunition, shots for hand-held anti-tank grenade launchers are offered. For them, a special package of guides for 6-7 shots is provided in the back of the robot.
      2. 0
        27 February 2013 13: 09
        Horseradish radish is not sweeter ...
    2. 0
      1 March 2013 10: 33
      yes yes yes I also want to identity in a tank in Washington !!!
  5. +22
    27 February 2013 08: 20
    And the creators of the video have a sense of humor (foolishness). Feel free to show who and where xD robots are fighting
    1. BruderV
      0
      28 February 2013 11: 53
      When I saw the crossed Amer, I cried straight. Harness guys! Why not in the finale guessed the smoking ruins of a white house with a developing tricolor?
  6. demon ada
    +1
    27 February 2013 08: 28
    I think the size of the video is underestimated,
    of course the less the better
    it is necessary to create not radio-controlled toys but combat robots with a system of amateur decision-making and control over it.
    sizes will be comparable with the BTR -60.
  7. +1
    27 February 2013 08: 29
    A hybrid of the rover and BMPT plus miniRSZU, originally. The biggest questions are raised by the control system, and not a word about it.
    1. Net
      Net
      +2
      27 February 2013 10: 20
      I think the biggest questions are raised by the technical vision system. The speed with which the device responds to emerging threats suggests that it has one human operator for each round-robin camera. For computer image recognition does not have such efficiency. AI is difficult to distinguish a drawn dog from a cat on a piece of paper.
  8. kav8206
    +5
    27 February 2013 08: 36
    This is not a robot in the literal sense of the word, but a machine on the control panel in fact. So, a person will choose a target and destroy it.
    1. Good man
      +1
      27 February 2013 14: 52
      Quote: kav8206
      This is not a robot in the literal sense of the word, but a machine on the control panel in fact. So, a person will choose a target and destroy it.

      So control can be intercepted and used against their own ...
      1. Kir
        0
        27 February 2013 17: 22
        That's how much I remember in the case of Chernobyl, and not only -Fokushima. so for these remotely controlled super ....., where there was serious radiation, you had to work with human pens, and where are the guarantees that by the time of appearance portable sources of directed powerful radiation will not appear, and then what, either throw an expensive toy or crawl to help out? most likely, this is by no means my opinion, a "link" of automatic machines and a control machine will operate .. or they will operate in the "line of sight" area.
  9. Son
    Son
    +1
    27 February 2013 08: 51
    From, there was a time .. !!! Two harsh men met in the open field ... And, in the hands of swords ... Eyes in the eyes, and decided - which of them is cooler ... Honestly ..!
  10. Sergio
    0
    27 February 2013 08: 54
    Complete fantasy. SHYKARNY cartoon. The battlefield, in fact, has never been gouged out by craters, there are no ruins, no artificial obstacles. The chassis is absolutely not adapted to difficult terrain. A sort of motorway armored car. The most interesting thing is that sworn friends have been developing all kinds of robotic and similar devices for a long time, and in our country they draw cartoons with rapture. Yes, and a war on the topic: "on a foreign land, with little blood." Already somehow it was like that.
    1. +1
      27 February 2013 13: 19
      Previously, there were no cartoons.
      Even so, advertising is all the same.
      And there, you look, and running alive.
  11. +10
    27 February 2013 08: 57
    Mindful of the experience of Rusnano and other budget-friendly feeding troughs, the Russian combat robot will be something like this. Really funny?
    1. 0
      19 March 2013 15: 27
      Into the nanoscale nanoscale!
  12. +3
    27 February 2013 09: 18
    It may be fantastic, but the fact that there are similar ideas is already good.
  13. +1
    27 February 2013 09: 21
    I like this! A very good idea! The main thing is that the bureaucrats do not put sawmill implement this idea ...... The cartoon is good
  14. +2
    27 February 2013 09: 29
    It is necessary to sell the idea abroad, there (as usual) it will be seen how fruitful it is.
    1. +1
      27 February 2013 11: 13
      Quote: Yoon Klob
      It is necessary to sell the idea abroad, there (as usual) it will be seen how fruitful it is.

      Well, if only for the purpose of misinformation .... weak for their budget lol
  15. +6
    27 February 2013 09: 32
    THE CART IS SIMPLY CHICAL !!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!! I APPLODED STANDING !!!!!!!!!!!!!! The frank landscapes of the city of striped and praying striped marines made me crawl PATTZOL !!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
    Now seriously! My non-professional gaze appeared several obvious schools. What kind of **** is this from behind, which opens ABRAMS like a can of condensed milk. With the same garbage, he easily knocks down two Apaches. The reaction of the robot is such that another contractor may envy it. And the analytics of the actions that these robots perform is absolutely fantastic.
    The protagonist’s actions are also not knitted at all. Why the Apache engage in direct battle, when he can send PTR from a distance inaccessible to the robot. Yet again. Judging by the ambush made on the tiger, the tactics of the partisan units, the enemy entered the city occupied by our enemies. I heard about the carelessness and venality in the army, but letting 4 tanks, one heavy armored car, 2 Apaches and two marines into a busy city please.
    Like the previous speaker, I also noticed that the city was not destroyed. Forgive what he will do with his clearance at the intersection and or destroyed city.
    PySy: beautiful fairy tale, cartoon pleased. All the same, I would like to note the baptizing Marine: "I WAS A MIRACLE .... A MIRACLE." But IMHO it's a fairy tale! Although the combat robot needs help. And not the one who will give a lift to the stretcher, but who will also be able to drag the wounded, because the wounded can be unconscious.
    1. biglow
      +1
      27 February 2013 17: 06
      PROXOR,
      and imagine a big city like New York, it’s impossible to take such a city under control, only certain regions can be controlled. Therefore, this option is quite possible. And the absence of funnels on the roads is also easy to explain. Do you think emigrants living in large cities will fight to the last drop blood, turning every city into Stalingrad, is very doubtful. Most likely they will scatter like cockroaches
  16. +1
    27 February 2013 09: 47
    erased - to whom science fiction and a drawn concept ... well, and who already in iron AND IN REAL OPERATION ... rummage at your leisure hi
    http://abctriponline.ru/armiya-oboronyi-izrailya/boevyie-robotyi-izrailya
    http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=s1qrzPGfvgE
  17. +8
    27 February 2013 11: 00
    Quote: viktor_ui
    erased - to whom science fiction and hand-drawn concept ... well, and who already in iron AND IN REAL USE ... rummage at your leisure hi
    http://abctriponline.ru/armiya-oboronyi-izrailya/boevyie-robotyi-izrailya
    http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=s1qrzPGfvgE

    And what is interesting about these radio-controlled cars? Mine clearance and video surveillance?

    So this good and we have enough.



    But the Jews hardly have this:

    MRK-27







    http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=oXO_1OmaSpc

    http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=tJxfDQ_l0CY
    1. -1
      27 February 2013 13: 10
      So what?

      http://wejew.com/media/9712/Meet_the_Israeli_Unmanned_Ground_Combat_Vehicle_-_Av
      antGuard /

      Or is this Amstaff?

      Different blocks are installed on it, depending on the requirements. And these are robots, not radio-controlled cars.
      1. Andrey58
        +3
        27 February 2013 19: 43
        Quote: Pimply
        And these are robots, not radio-controlled cars.

        Do you want to say they themselves are able to fight?
        1. 0
          27 February 2013 19: 56
          I recommend reading and watching.
          1. Andrey58
            +1
            27 February 2013 21: 47
            Quote: Pimply
            I recommend reading and watching.

            There’s nothing special to watch in your video. You can draw any computer graphics, pokatushki escorted by a CABG and the squad of soldiers were also not impressed (especially an unprotected camera).
            Read found only this http://texnomaniya.ru/voennaya-texnika/robot-amstaf-rasshirjaet-svoi-vozmozhnost
            i.html But it says here that
            The tactical robots will be controlled and monitored using a Toughbook laptop or wrist-mounted controller that can give Amstaf basic commands for simple coordination with the infantry, such as "Stop!", "Follow me."

            That is, where the "non-radio-controlled cars" is also not clear.
            1. -3
              27 February 2013 23: 53
              Once again - I recommend reading the sources
    2. +1
      27 February 2013 13: 36
      GreatRussia - then I look at these robots in the army with us right around every corner in BULK ... do not make me laugh with exhibition samples of piece Pribluda with characteristics written on paper and which do not have the slightest combat experience of application, well, or at worst having experience simple patrols.
  18. Alexey Prikazchikov
    0
    27 February 2013 11: 40
    By the way, he is already patented.
    1. +1
      27 February 2013 16: 49
      By the way, he is ONLY patented
  19. in reserve
    +7
    27 February 2013 11: 42
    We have created, as it is called there "Agency for Advanced Development", here's an almost real idea for action, but to say well, that's expensive, not effective, everything is complicated, and we need to be simple and not expensive as we are used to thinking. So we will not go far, and we will continue to wear "felt boots" as they are simple and effective, or we will discuss for a whole month whether it is better to switch to socks or footcloths more efficiently.
    And my opinion is that such a developer is better at cutting the budget than generals in the army and promising managers like Serdyukov who cut down such projects at the root, and when the whole world is 10 years ahead of us, they say you need to buy abroad because everything is out of date with us.
    hi
  20. itr
    -6
    27 February 2013 11: 43
    Well, crap !!! I'm talking about the video
  21. +6
    27 February 2013 11: 51
    I agree with the opinion. that the size of the robot is clearly underestimated.
    I think the cost will not be great if you use proven technology over the years.
    Why so complicated armor? It seems to me quite ordinary, capable of withstanding the BTR / BMP guns with a caliber of up to 30 mm (well, or a little more), and even not in all projections.
    Why so many video cameras?
    Why new grenade launcher?
    The engine can be taken from the same UAZ.
    Yes, and make the chassis "passable", maybe even tracks for individual modifications.
    The possibility of exchanging data and creating a map with the marked threats and "fog of war" also suggests itself. And right in front of your eyes a "wolf pack" of such machines rises, with a separate scout (s), robot soldiers, ATGM robots, MANPADS robots, and probably towing robots (both the robots themselves and people).
    And then a UAV (or several) hovers above all this, too, exchanging data with the "flock" and with its weapons.
    And on the enemy side, the same thing!
    And people do not need to die, and the military strength of a country is determined by the quantity and "quality" of combat unmanned systems in service and their modernity.
    Something podzanet me, of course, but logically thinking you can come to such "conclusions".
    1. +3
      27 February 2013 16: 51
      At one point, they have a fraternization, and then -Kill all people !!!
  22. Denis_volgograd
    +3
    27 February 2013 11: 59
    Nah, vidos Zachatny! :))
  23. 0
    27 February 2013 12: 36
    The author of the video clearly does not like gray "Tricks".
  24. Lnosow
    +2
    27 February 2013 12: 58
    Original offer. I think in the Russian military-industrial complex there are many more talented guys.
  25. +3
    27 February 2013 13: 31
    To the director of the movie 5+.
    Excellent advertisement of domestic defense industry.
    They would still shoot a full-fledged cartoon on this base with a plot and heroic characters, it would be an excellent patriotic education of the younger generation.

    The robot is beautiful fantasy. As many said above, the layout is not promising. Management with simultaneous tracking of a picture from several cameras by a person is not real, and software and hardware for the implementation of AI of such a project do not yet exist.

    But the very appearance of such ideas, high-quality bringing to the layman, and obtaining patents are pleased.
  26. GG2012
    +1
    27 February 2013 13: 38
    Undoubtedly, the idea of ​​a mini tank and / or mini armored personnel carrier on radio control is the near future of urban and lowland wars ...
    ...
    As the saying goes ... a war is just around the corner. The war is already at the city walls.
    ...
    Meanwhile, the cursed bourgeoisie ... everything is already driving and shooting ...


    1. bask
      +2
      27 February 2013 16: 41
      Quote: GG2012
      I have time, with the cursed bourgeois ... everything is already driving and shooting ...

      That's for sure....
      1. GG2012
        +1
        27 February 2013 16: 49
        Quote: bask
        That's for sure....

        My hello to you! hi
        1. bask
          +1
          27 February 2013 16: 58
          Quote: GG2012
          My hello to you

          Hello, hello. In the USSR, in the 30s, radio-controlled tanks were tested.
    2. +2
      27 February 2013 18: 23
      GG2012,
      Meanwhile, the cursed bourgeoisie ... everything is already driving and shooting ...-- AHA belay ......... especially in commercials !!! wink laughing
    3. Old skeptic
      0
      27 February 2013 18: 42
      It’s only a trolley, up to a combat model of everything that they and ours show, as before China with cancer.
  27. -3
    27 February 2013 13: 38
    Not a patent, but a compilation of existing ideas and solutions. stop
    1. Bars90
      0
      5 March 2013 20: 28
      Now the whole world is in such compilations ...
  28. Skavron
    0
    27 February 2013 13: 42
    I don’t know how much such a robot will cost as in a video, but the video itself cost 20 greenery ... something like that.

    Quote: Appiann
    I think the cost will not be great

    And I think that its cost will be very high.
    Only the software will not pull sour + the "brains" themselves. Hardly in Russia there is an opportunity to equip this robot with high-quality electronics. Arms agree, equip.
  29. +2
    27 February 2013 14: 29
    I am glad that finally the authors of the projects do not make patents, but they also show their idea in animation

    the truth catches the eye immediately some things:

    - while there is no such compact source of energy to feed this fool so small, but heavy in weight (here the weight for armor and weapons under 3 tons will be, for example, the OKA weighs about 800 kg, it is almost the same size, but armor and weapons it doesn’t) - because a small diesel generator will not be able to give out a drain of energy to power all these systems, and the accumulators now in size and weight will obviously be the size of this crumb

    - it’s rubber :) it’s crammed with runoff, that it wouldn’t fit into it, all the more so, such crampedness immediately puts a big cross on the cooling of systems

    - the reaction rate to what is happening, but in principle it is possible to automate these processes, this is not difficult to do - a friend or foe system or motion or shooting sensors (now the same perimeter security systems are easily distinguished by a distance of 2 km what kind of object is a dog or a person crawls for example, etc.), well, or corny the operator sets the area where the system can work in a fully autonomous mode, killing everything that moves

    In fact, the idea is very interesting, I especially liked the trailer for transporting the wounded
    =======
    And I think that its cost will be very high.
    Only the software will not pull sour + the "brains" themselves. Hardly in Russia there is an opportunity to equip this robot with high-quality electronics. Arms agree, equip.


    The software is worth a penny, if you do not steal :) We still do electronics for the military, moreover, quite successfully. Will orders - will do more and better
    1. Skavron
      0
      27 February 2013 14: 51
      Quote: Bad
      Software costs a penny

      Throw off the contacts of coders writing cheap software of this level ... really necessary)
  30. +2
    27 February 2013 15: 06
    Quote: Skavron
    Throw off the contacts of coders writing cheap software of this level ... really necessary)


    The cost of software is cheap, just if you wind up one programmer for 2 programmers, another director for 3 of these programmers, etc. - then of course the cost becomes many times more :)

    if you don’t look at the office, everywhere on one workhorse 2-3 parasite on top
    1. -2
      27 February 2013 15: 27
      Oh oh Cheap? Honestly what?
      1. Kir
        +1
        27 February 2013 16: 47
        In fact, Zlyuchny is partially right, if you exclude from the cost the markup for every often unreasonably inflated management, in particular Top, minus the money for advertising, then you will get a very tangible savings. But who needs it, when all warm places have their own, and they often do not know how to do anything and do not want to, except to "suck money".
        1. Skavron
          0
          27 February 2013 17: 35
          Cyrus, I don’t know specialists of this level who are willing to write for less than $ 50 / hour, and + servers, and + equipment, and + project manager ... so it will not cost a "penny".
          1. Kir
            0
            27 February 2013 18: 59
            Actually, it seems like I said in part. and this definition refers to the staff and not the equipment, so it seems like I didn't talk about kopecks, but about what Eugene says about the organization of work on the part of management. So I stay with my own because, although I will not point the finger, I know for sure examples are not isolated, namely, not just bloated but unreasonably bloated management. and with regards to the organization and redistribution of work and tasks, if the organization is competently organized once and for all with a clear definition and distribution of responsibility, then exactly there such a staff will be redundant and unnecessary, and a competent specialist, which is by no means a blue person with "correct crusts "quite freely can replace several" specialists "of the new format without much effort.
        2. 0
          27 February 2013 17: 38
          The excessively overblown management, which they love to talk about, is committed to organizing the work of different departments, redistributing it, setting tasks and much more.
  31. +1
    27 February 2013 15: 45
    And I have a mystical koment. Maybe someone seems to be off topic ..
    Exactly a month before the start of hostilities in Iraq, I have a very vivid and colorful dream, which I remember in detail. Our old apartment in Novosibirsk, sixth floor. The apartment has a balcony and a loggia facing east and west. The beginning is much vague. But I clearly remember - I stand on the loggia and observe dozens of small "dancers", similar to those that were painted in childhood, playing "dancers" on a double sheet. A little more than a meter high. Short barrel. And an interesting coloring - white below, red on top. And the cries of people are an invasion. For some reason they moved from the north. Periodically shooting at the obstacles encountered. And then someone shouts - ours are flying. They will show them.
    We run to the west side. We see a large armada of different aircraft - in the center there are large transporters and bombers, surrounded by fighters. And here between the houses a red and white trifle taxies out, lifts up its short barrel .. It's hard to describe - something like a flamethrower shot breaks out of the trunk. But on approaching the aircraft begins to swirl and creates a huge fireball in which the death of most heavy aircraft. Here from the cry of people who watched all this, I woke up. Too realistic.
    After a year and a half on the Internet, I run into an Israeli fighting robot - and it seemed like a shock to me. A little armament and dimensions are not the same, but it seems. Since then I have been watching similar things ..
    1. +1
      27 February 2013 16: 30
      Well, I think you need to stock up with 5koy grenade launchers for the future so that you don’t look at such things indifferently
  32. +1
    27 February 2013 16: 28
    A soldier with a good old RPG -7 is much cheaper))) We can’t really come up with a normal assault car for the city, which is too much for robots.
    1. +1
      27 February 2013 16: 34
      A soldier with a good old RPG -7 is much cheaper))) We can’t really come up with a normal assault car for the city, which is too much for robots.

      How much are soldiers now?
      1. Kir
        +1
        27 February 2013 16: 55
        Professor, And it depends on which side to look, parents and relatives or bureaucrats? The question should rather be posed so as to more effectively cope with the task. moreover, the offset of lives does not go one to one, since you and the employee are well aware of this.
        And about what Marssik said that we can’t think of a worthwhile one, I want to ask, but does Marssik know about all ideas not embodied in the material to confirm this? Maybe it is worth reformulating that why it is not visible real-in the material samples?
        1. 0
          27 February 2013 17: 06
          And it depends on which side to look, parents and relatives or bureaucrats?

          From the state or army. It is clear that for the mother, the son is priceless and rightly so. But generals must sacrifice soldiers and the question remains open: how much is a soldier for them today?

          The question should rather be posed so who is more effective in coping with the task

          What does it mean effectively? Hit the target and lose just one soldier or call the aircraft, and those at the price of $ 200-300 thousand will destroy the target, but will save the life of the soldier?

          And about what Marssik said that we can’t think of a worthwhile

          Russia can come up with everything that it wants; smart people are full, but the problem is already embodied in metal, as the system does not contribute to put it mildly. I know this from my own experience, I worked hard in Ukraine (I think there is not much difference with Russia) and in the damned West.
          1. Kir
            0
            27 February 2013 17: 30
            Forgive this effectively, as Matrosov’s life, at least as an event presented, in other words, the life of one hero is the saved lives of many others, there is simply no certainty that such units can be just as effective in many difficult situations this time will not wake up too many others lives.
  33. vladsolo56
    +3
    27 February 2013 16: 45
    I was always struck by one thing, as soon as a normal idea appears, there are screamers of criticism right there, which is unrealistic, fantastic, expensive and so on. Well, to sit and do nothing at all, and then with a clever air to declare that everything is better in the West is much easier. A rolling stone gathers no moss. If you do nothing, then do nothing. Question, do you need such cars? Yes. Then you have to start and start yesterday. to make samples to try, remodel, and not to strive for cheapness, cheap cannot be effective in our time. Saving on security is somehow unreasonable even. The main thing in such developments should still be efficiency, you can immediately say the same super machine for paratroopers.
    1. to water
      0
      27 February 2013 18: 13
      It's all about motivation. Private business is not interested in long-term money, and first invest your own (when something turns out there is a bunch of suckers). And our legislation does not encourage such things. An official from a ministry or a state the enterprise is also not interested in it, he is not in his place for a long time for 4 years, and during this time it is necessary to grab more. Therefore, they take projects with a large budget, and on the exhaust - "the mountain gave birth to a mouse." It used to be motivation - you take on a project, give a result. No result - you go to Siberia. There is a result - you have a special car, special support, etc. etc. Unfortunately, any resource today in our country has a huckster.
  34. Old skeptic
    0
    27 February 2013 18: 38
    Quote: tun1313
    The chassis is cool, the idea is right, right, but the performance will be very different.

    The "wheel motor" is a very controversial option (too large unsprung weight, the car will be very heavy, which means fire on the move is a big question.
  35. 0
    27 February 2013 19: 12
    Remind me, my friends, when we fought on the screen with amers, and even in their territory? How is it???
    1. 0
      27 February 2013 19: 29
      On the screen? Call of Dury: Modern Warfare, second and third parts. Russian troops on the Capitol, the burning White House and the whole fleet at the New York coast. bully
      By the way, there was also a combat robot there, from the Russian Megawatts company.
  36. 0
    27 February 2013 19: 42
    It’s a pity that this is a cartoon. Such a robot would definitely not hurt our army. And on screen exactly Call of Dury: Modern Warfare.
  37. -1
    27 February 2013 20: 20
    I will try to comment on during the viewing:
    - On the "Tiger", in a clearly American metropolis, where 100% of their school buses are on the streets and a Russian military base is located nearby? - Yes, Red Alert is resting.
    - Yes, and besides, all the equipment on the base is in even rows, probably to make it more convenient to cover one missile and this is in the conduct of hostilities - such as complete air supremacy? Nude Nude.
    - The operator’s screen is divided into a hell of a bunch of parts? What for? Max. 2-3 windows - otherwise the attention is completely scattered.
    - Robots abruptly "iron man" will be. Everyone sees, they react to everything correctly. And a grenade launcher there for you, and missiles, and a machine gun. And all in one bottle. Cool. I'm only afraid when there will be such robots - there will be other tanks and helicopters.
    - Absolutely mediocre "defense" of the enemy. Along the way, the guys just lived in these apartments and woke up and decided to defend from them.
    - To be stunned. Tanks at a time, or rather two. The helicopter did not strike and, for some reason, came close in its dead zone. What are our guys made of?
    “Oh, you can still kill them, bravo.” But what a count.
    - US Army gas masks to anything.
    - And what is the likelihood that the wounded man crawls into the tray? And if not?
    I look further, but for some reason the thought is brewing: And then why the heck are all those tanks, armored personnel carriers and others at the base? One hopper and crush all the robots.
    “Wow, and let the enemy in the smoke not see us.” Yes, and nobody covers the tanks either.

    Well, yes, the last "sudden" exercises showed that one officer on duty at the base in Tajikistan did not receive an alarm signal at all, because the lines are used by civilians, and here of course it is. Not, well, of course, yes, well, very much, although ... more.
    The campaign was created under the leadership of Medvedev. He is also far from reality.
    1. +3
      27 February 2013 20: 27
      Don't you think that you took a fantastic video too close to your heart?
      1. 0
        27 February 2013 21: 56
        No, I just don’t like outright flood. It would be the case, but ....
    2. 0
      8 March 2013 17: 10
      Refers to those who "minus". Guys, you need to be proud of your country and your technique, but underestimating the enemy and over-praising your strength is tantamount to betrayal. Remembering the good old Eastern wisdom of one ruler: "Friends who diminish the strength of the enemy and praise yours are worse than enemy spies"
  38. AK-47
    +4
    27 February 2013 21: 28
    As it later turned out, a remotely controlled mobile robot (this is what the machine is currently called) is the subject of a patent belonging to a certain D.K. Semenov.


    It would be more attention to the state such Semenov.
    1. Kir
      +1
      27 February 2013 21: 43
      Attention, and not only at the initial stage of submitting an application, but also in the future, and not only of any kind of help, but God forbid that anything the state could demand if something, but then too many of them have been divorced recently, yes and the authorship of Auger is no less relevant. because it’s like somewhere else, in the same archive or somewhere else I saw ......, well, somehow.
  39. +1
    27 February 2013 21: 43
    Strong roller (Die Hard, Russian)
    The idea is right. In urban environments where distances are limited, the range and strength of the lesion are inferior to the speed of detection and strike. Often, even the level of security has less certainty (due to the variety of damaging elements, means - and not significance).
    This project is most suitable for supporting tanks: the tank itself will protect itself from helicopters of tanks and other enemy vehicles, and from a manpower with portable anti-tank means it can be protected by a tool that has wide scan and guidance functions for instant detection and lightning suppression, by firing barrage, enemy manpower, at distances dangerous for subdivision.
  40. ko88
    0
    27 February 2013 21: 51
    It's time for us to go! adopt such a miracle)))
  41. troll face
    0
    27 February 2013 22: 08
    The video is shot well, so it would be in life ..
  42. EDW
    EDW
    +1
    27 February 2013 23: 13
    A lot of correct writing and controversial. In general, I liked the video (the landscape is successful good ), although it contains a lot of inconsistencies both in the number of weapons on robots and their reaction speed (or operators) and in the slack actions of the enemy ... then, I think, it’s not worth repeating.

    Separately horrified operator screen. He is familiar with multi-display workstations in video editing, sound processing, TV quality control systems, etc., and how difficult it is for an operator to keep track of operational information from several windows / monitors. wassat ... in general, I do not envy the operator. If you’ve already decided on a circular review, then you need to implement it continuously - modern video adapters do not allow this. There should be two continuous sectors - for example, the front viewing area on the top of the screen, and the back on the bottom, or two continuous scans from all the images from the cameras on the case, and the second scan from the cameras on the turret. In this case, it is very desirable that adjacent cameras overlap the visibility zones in case some of the optics fail.

    As for the communication channel, everything is not going smoothly either - wireless video transmission channels will need some megabit, moreover, they will be resistant to interference in the conditions of operation of enemy electronic units and the screening effect of reinforced concrete structures.
  43. SHOGUN
    0
    27 February 2013 23: 51
    Trolls! I see trolls! And when do I see trolls? Always, when it comes to positive aspects in Russia, even if theoretical or hypothetical. And then there’s horror! Anglo-Saxons were shouted for in the cabbage, on their own territory! Nightmare!
  44. +3
    28 February 2013 00: 28
    I saw a lot of amersich videos more fantastically, and for some it causes a storm of delight, they immediately begin to compare the companimation with serial models, write that everything goes and flies there, swims and shoots. Once watching Tsiolkovsky’s bike, they twisted a finger at the temple !!!
  45. +2
    28 February 2013 01: 55
    ..why com video the war zone is represented by smooth asphalt ....... in reality it is a heap of broken bricks and the remains of reinforced concrete structures .... (although at an early stage of the conflict .. the place can be even)
  46. Mr. Truth
    +1
    28 February 2013 11: 22
    Cosmopolitan youths are indignant. After the works of the American gaming and film industries, Russians have the right to be bad and not beaten.
  47. geptilshik
    +1
    28 February 2013 11: 47
    in terms of design, fantastic in the next 100-200 years in Russia
  48. valek
    0
    28 February 2013 14: 56
    I support the author. The idea is good. lineup may be different. Well, here's what I wanted to say: replace a conventional engine with an electric one. Powered by Tesla coils (if possible), a wire with a diffuser (surplus goes to the bottom through it) Akum are connected to the coils. If possible, make sure that the excess goes to the reserve Akum. Pluses less noise, more working time. Cons: a rare type of engine that will increase the cost, reliability, fuel.
  49. 0
    28 February 2013 16: 22
    I propose not to guess how long it will be created, but rather to estimate the current possibilities of creation.
    1. I think you should start with the engine. Let's look at modern brands, capacities, dimensions.
    2. Armor. We will focus on the non-penetration of a 30 mm shell. Approximate booking area-Armor mark-density (kg / cubic meter) - hence the approximate total weight of the armor
    3. Armament. Let's start with a machine gun + grenade launcher. Weapon weight, ammunition (and its weight).
    4. The chassis. (tracks / wheels) pros and cons. If the wheels then the formula, for example. 4x4, etc.
    5. Target recognition system. At least examples of such systems (if they certainly are).
    6. Weapons control system (hydro / pneumatic / electro / mech is still something. Probably it’s also controlling the machine itself, but maybe not.
    7. Control and data transmission system. Again, examples, if any.
    8. Well, the most interesting thing is the layout.
    This topic is probably read by experts and knowledgeable people in different fields. It would be great to know their opinion on the possibility of creating such an apparatus.
    We prove that we can not only discuss and criticize, but also at least find out something ourselves. I think this topic is the best suited for such a statement.
  50. Harleone
    0
    28 February 2013 21: 48
    Judging by the cartoon, the defense industry mastered advertising and marketing. The question is whether production and supply will be mastered.
  51. 0
    1 March 2013 10: 37
    The cartoon is clear, I was very pleased!!! when Amer crossed himself he actually screamed!))))
    I REALLY hope that this machine will end up in service with the troops in 5-8 years!
  52. al25ex
    0
    2 March 2013 19: 30
    A good cartoon and a very real project. It’s not for nothing that Semyonov received a patent for it. As for hardware, everything has long been invented (Watch the series Impact Force) Well, there are enough bright minds in our country to develop control systems and software.
  53. Bars90
    0
    5 March 2013 20: 29
    There are quite a lot of such projects... You need to look and choose.
  54. grigory53
    -1
    6 March 2013 14: 45
    Interesting topic! Everything would be fine!
    Only the robot itself was collaged and copied by this author from several other people’s applications and publications made from 1995 to 2003 (and without the author’s consent)

    http://koganitsky.narod.ru/framea.html

    http://koganitsky.narod.ru/antitankb.html

    http://samlib.ru/k/koganickij_g_a/shturmowojrobot.shtml

    http://koganitsky.narod.ru/antitankb.html

    I am currently preparing an open letter to the press and a letter to Rospatent
    1. vladsolo56
      +1
      6 March 2013 15: 05
      You can write as much as you like, but first it is better to consult with specialists. Don't mess things up where everything is clean
  55. Zhzhuk
    0
    9 March 2013 10: 27
    an interesting idea and quite promising, but there is no need for war and you must always be ready to repel an attack
  56. Yankuz
    0
    15 March 2013 09: 46
    Cool! We must begin to implement this concept - the process will show all sides - both strong and weak, and in the end a truly effective thing that is needed for our army will come to life!
  57. 0
    15 March 2013 23: 24
    Our Indian friends also started developing a robot warrior, namely
    Defense Research Development Organization (R&DE) laboratory.
    They called him Daksh and he came from a robot sapper.

    One of his weapon options:
    - AGS30 grenade launcher
    - Kalashnikov Tank machine gun 7,62 mm
    Equipped with night vision devices and a thermal imager.

    There are two types of tires for it:
    one for urban environments and the other pneumatic tires for rough terrain.

    Power reserve - up to 1 km.
    The range is up to 200 meters from the operator.

  58. 0
    19 March 2013 15: 30
    Cool cartoon, straight anime... The idea is great, it's a pity that losses are inevitable.
  59. CBR
    CBR
    +1
    April 2 2013 11: 39
    1. There is NOT A SINGLE original idea in this concept, and it itself is not an original idea. There are a great many such robotic mini-armored cars invented around the world. Electric transmission has been around for a long time.

    2. The concept is very crude, at the first quick glance a lot of questions arise

    3. The choice of weapons and their placement shows a total lack of understanding of tactics. It is clear that the author did not think through the concept of application and does not understand what it is at all

    4. Section with internal layout shows zero engineering level
    What is the cost of at least an air gun, an engine without cooling, an RPG unit on hydraulics, which, in the form as in the video, stupidly will not fold completely, etc. and so on.

    5. To implement the project, nothing is missing: an automation system with AI elements capable of detecting and recognizing targets
    Such a trifle, which will become technologically possible in Russia in 20 years, when something outdated, as usual, will be torn off from the West. And it will require very expensive implementation and fine-tuning work.

    6. Don't be fooled by patents. Nowadays you can get a patent for any nonsense, it’s business. I've seen patents for devices that violate the fundamental laws of physics :D

    7. The author makes cartoons well, unfortunately, no more

    8. I am looking through the patents of our young talents, this, comrades, is quiet horror. Soon the old Soviet engineers will leave the military-industrial complex due to age, and then the real fun will begin. It's already starting

    P.S. Baumansky combat robot, posted in the comments above, is a crooked craft at the level of garage enthusiasts ((
  60. 0
    April 2 2013 12: 22
    Quote: CBR
    Bauman combat robot, placed
    in the comments above there is a crooked craft at the level of garage enthusiasts ((


    I agree.
    But the Belarusians created the “Robo-Cop thunderstorm”: “Adunok-M”.
    (by the way, the Indian prototype is very similar to it)
    A fully functional product, and also accurate:
    in the video he manages to fire short bursts from a machine gun
    “fill in” the name of the manufacturer’s campaign.

    Here is an article on the same forum:
    http://topwar.ru/13110-voennyy-robot-iz-belarusi-adunok-m.html#comment-id-104130

    4

    As far as I understand, the complex is not autonomous,
    and is controlled by an operator.
    But humanity is far from artificial intelligence :)
  61. CBR
    CBR
    0
    April 3 2013 16: 03
    "Display" Belarusians are great

    The characteristics of the complex are quite modern

    2 km detection, acquisition, target tracking, thermal imager

    I was pleased with how quickly the “adunok” transfers fire from target to target
    There in one place he does a “split” of 250m in height-spaced seconds in two
    1. 0
      April 3 2013 16: 11
      Does the lack of a stabilizer bother you? wink
  62. CBR
    CBR
    0
    April 4 2013 14: 14
    And about the “display”, look at the stories, they say work is underway on the stabilizer tongue
    1. Engineer
      0
      18 January 2014 01: 03
      OJSC KB Display does not carry out work on the weapon stabilizer (SV) because the developers do not even have an understanding of the principles of constructing a fire control system (FCS), which includes the fire control system.