Compare the DPRK Air Force and South Korea

21
In connection with the new tension of the situation, I want to analyze the ratio of the armed forces of Kazakhstan and the DPRK.

Air force

Республика Корея


The Air Force of the Republic of Korea is not very large in numbers, but very modern and in good condition.

They are based on the X-NUMX heavy fighter F-42K (on 15% consisting of local components). The devices are a redesigned and improved version of the F-60E supplemented with modern infrared equipment, improved radars and an interactive helmet control system.

The most massive machine is the F-5E "Tiger" (174 machines as part of the Air Force). Much of the locally produced machines. All cars are modifications of E.



The next most massive machine is the F-16 fighter, which is available in 170 (35 F-16C, 90 KF-16C and 45 KF-16D, the last cars of local assembly). All vehicles are adapted to modern ammunition. Modification of all machines - block 32 and above.





Old machines in service is relatively less. Currently 68 F-4 Phantom-2 fighter-bomber available in the attack aircraft.

Compare the DPRK Air Force and South Korea


Light Assault Training aviation represented primarily by 64 lightweight KAI T-50 trainers. About 80 of these machines are planned for production. These light attack aircraft have speeds of up to 1,4-1,5 MaXa, a radius of action of 1851 kilometers, and can carry a variety of loads, including laser bombs, air-to-air missiles and analogues.

The fleet of helicopters is relatively small, and includes mainly the old American models of transport, light and multi-purpose helicopters.



The Air Force is also in charge of the country's air defense system. On the 2010 year, it is represented by 6 8 batteries on Patriot launchers PAC-2 (former German, 148 missiles in total) and 24 MIM-24 HAWK batteries (about 600 missiles). All rocket launchers are integrated into the AN / MQP-64 Sentinel radar system.

Korea, Democratic People's Republic of

The DPRK air force, in contrast, is amazed by the number of available cars, but their quality is far from ideal. In total there are about 1500 airplanes, mostly obsolete.



The newest Air Force machines are the 35 MIG-29S fighters with an improved fire control system. These machines, in fact, are the only modern fighters. According to the existing data, most of these vehicles are concentrated in Pyongyang’s air defense, which can only be explained by the paranoia of the country's authorities (since Pyongyang’s air defense is already strong enough, and the 35 fighters add little to it). Probably, the machines are maintained in good condition.



The next oldest fighter is the Mig-23ML, of which there are 46 (another 10 Mig-23Р). This machine is a lightweight highly maneuverable version of the regular Mig-23, focused on rocket duels. In theory, the machines can carry P-23 and P-60, which are in service.



The most massive fighter is the Mig-21, of which in service around 190 (including licensed Chinese). Presumably - due to problems with spare parts - only a part of this fleet is airworthy. These are completely outdated, heavily worn out models that formed the basis of the DPRK aircraft fleet in 1960-1980. Most likely, at present it is also difficult for them to find pilots, because of the problems with fuel, most of the fleet is idle.



Also, there are about 200 completely outdated Chinese-made MiG-17 class fighters. These machines are of no combat value, and, in accordance with their characteristics, are no more combat-ready than modern light training aircraft. Presumably, they have only gun armament. It is difficult to understand the meaning of maintaining the fleet of such outdated aircraft, if, due to problems with fuel, their pilots did not fly for a long time. The only possible use for them is the role of attack aircraft in the front line.



For unknown reasons, the DPRK Air Force still has over the 80 of the old IL-28 jet bombers. It is difficult to understand what role the generals of the DPRK assign to these machines. Perhaps their role is assumed in the delivery weapons mass destruction, although it is difficult to understand how these old sluggish planes can generally survive in modern warfare.

The DPRK ground attack aircraft is represented by a large number of aircraft, mostly old models. These are Su-7, Su-22, Q-5 - the total number over 98. Although obsolescence is not as important for attack aircraft as it is for fighters, yet these vehicles are hardly capable of combat at the present time (due to heavy wear and poor pilot training)



The only modern attack aircraft are L-29 (12 units) and Su-25, in the number of 36 machines.

The helicopter fleet of the DPRK is strong enough, although it is still very small in number. It is based on helicopters of the old models - Mi-2 and Mi-4 (around 200 machines), most of which are obsolete. The most modern vehicles are combat Mi-24 (24 units), transport Mi-26 (4 units), transport Mi-8 (15 units) and militarized American-made MD 500D helicopters (87 units)

In general, judging by the state of the DPRK's air force, they represent a very insignificant military force. Although SEPARATE vehicles and pilots are probably not inferior to the Southerners, in general, the level of training of pilots, the scooter of all, is lower due to lack of fuel. In addition, much of the machines are physically outdated, and are characterized by low security.

To a certain extent, this is offset by the country's powerful and well-designed air defense system. The North Korean air defense system is one of the richest and deeply echeloned in the world. Although it does not have truly effective complexes, it is still striking in its richness.



The DPRK's air defense system is based on X-NUMX C-24 missile launchers. Supposedly, they are supplemented by a locally produced C-200 analog, but this information - in the face of the obvious failures of the DPRK in rocket engineering and electronics - does not look reliable.

The most popular air defense systems of the country are C-125 (128 launchers) and C-75 (240 launchers)



Paradoxically, the DPRK is still armed with the C-25 complex, which was decommissioned in all countries. It is difficult to explain why, but these clumsy and decrepit rockets form the basis of Pyongyang’s air defense. Preserving them in service is due either to the lack of any possibility of replacement (which clearly speaks not in favor of the alleged production in the DPRK C-300) or the incompetence of the military leadership, who believes that "the main thing is quantity." Without a doubt, the resources devoured by this hopelessly outdated complex could be much more intelligently used to maintain the C-200!

The field is represented by the Krug, Kuba, Strela, Igla and Buk complexes, altogether over 1000 missiles. The exact number of launchers is unknown.

Over 11000 anti-aircraft artillery units are also available. For the most part, these are outdated samples from very different backgrounds. None of them is modern, and their real combat capability is close to zero.

In general, the DPRK's air force is a powerful force, but only thanks to the air defense system. The destructive element itself is very weak, which is aggravated by the insufficient training of the pilots.
21 comment
Information
Dear reader, to leave comments on the publication, you must sign in.
  1. yur20100
    +4
    23 July 2013 17: 33
    after the war, the dPRK was constantly preparing for war with america, without us troops, south korea would long ago have united with northern
  2. The comment was deleted.
  3. +3
    17 March 2017 09: 31
    Unification of Korea is beneficial to no one. Imagine a united Korea, With a powerful economy of the South and nuclear weapons of the North. Little does not seem, right?
    1. +1
      20 March 2017 18: 05
      any unification of the North and the South is the end of the Korean economic miracle.
      1. 0
        10 August 2017 19: 31
        No, this is the end of tension in this region, which means that the US base will lose its relevance and they will be asked for a way out ... And due to unification, Korea will only get stronger ... Less can be spent on the army, more on the economy ...
  4. 0
    17 March 2017 12: 31
    Well, the F-5, too, cannot be called modern aircraft. If I’m not mistaken, they still fought in Vietnam.
    1. 0
      20 March 2017 13: 44
      At least they fly and are maintained in good condition.
    2. +2
      24 May 2017 19: 30
      The "modern" F-5s are definitely older than the "obsolete" Su-22.
      And the pearl in the article amused: "The only modern attack aircraft are the L-29" (? !!)
      L-29 - A long obsolete training aircraft, decommissioned almost everywhere
      1. +3
        24 May 2017 19: 36
        “Light training and attack aircraft are represented, first of all, by 64 KAI T-50 light trainers. About 80 of these machines are planned for production. These light attack aircraft have speeds of up to 1,4-1,5 MaX and a radius of action of 1851 kilometers. .. "

        The range of 1851 km is the radius for a very weak bomber, and certainly not reachable for a combat trainer.
      2. 0
        9 January 2021 18: 11
        Su-17 \ 20 \ 22 have never been in service with the DPRK.
  5. 0
    24 March 2017 20: 48
    North Korea, in fact, is not going to fight with anyone, but seeing that the United States uses force everywhere and it is useless to negotiate with them, they are developing nuclear weapons while the United States will wave their fists. More and more countries will develop nuclear weapons to ensure at least an imaginary safe existence.
    1. +1
      24 March 2017 20: 58
      Nuclear weapons for them - a means of blackmail, and nothing more. Nobody is going to attack them - what then to do with this crowd with brainwashed.
      1. +2
        April 12 2017 12: 13
        “Nobody is going to attack them.” 8- (Well, of course, aircraft carriers are just a joke. From Panama and Grenada to Yugoslavia and Libya these are not attacks.
      2. +4
        April 24 2017 07: 40
        Nobody is going to attack them.
        The United States throughout the post-war decades has threatened the DPRK with the use of nuclear weapons. Then, when the DPRK did not even think about its own nuclear weapons. Pyongyang’s nuclear bombing plans were even developed. It was supposed to stagger to drop 7-8 charges. After this information (which is quite logical), the DPRK thought about purchasing this weapon in its arsenal. There was no doubt that the United States was able to use it (the inhabitants of Japan will not let us lie ... And now we know what bombed Iraq, Libya, Afghanistan, Yugoslavia). Those. The United States was the catalyst that revealed the Korean nuclear crisis to the world. In 1994, the United States took advantage of the fact that the Soviet Union no longer seriously considered the issue of launching a company against the DPRK, but only their own losses and a large price tag cooled their ardor a bit, and started negotiations. Carter arrived and tackled everything. Everything seemed to be normal; the Koreans put out the reactor, including bringing it to a non-operational state, destroying the main temperature control system, and did not build anything new. We started dismantling other infrastructure facilities. Instead, they were promised fuel oil for their power plants and a couple of gigawatt reactors that are not structurally bridders. It would seem that everyone is happy? - No. The United States, with the advent of Bush, is going on an unreasonable aggravation, the country is being recorded on the axis of evil, more and more demands are being made. Despite the fact that the IAEA did not register any violations by the DPRK under the treaty, the Koreans were accused of enriching uranium (well, that ... in Iraq, too, according to the United States, there were nuclear weapons and other types of WMD, which turned out to be a heinous lie in the end). They stopped supplying fuel, they did not build reactors. Those. Koreans fulfilled their part of the contract a little more than completely, but the light elves did not. And the modern negotiations of the Russian Federation with them show that they are not negotiable. In such circumstances, the resumption of their nuclear weapons for the DPRK was the only right decision for the country and the fact that they later ceased to go to negotiations to meet the result of the actions of the rulers of the world and no one else. They cannot be trusted from the word at all that the DPRK is doing absolutely right. And this is not a means of blackmail, but a simple reaction to the actions of the "partners" (as our politicians like to call them). Well, someone who blackmailed the nuclear weapons objectionable to some countries is the United States itself.
        - what then to do with this crowd with brainwashed.
        And what did the US once think about the consequences of its actions? Moreover, they are sitting in a puddle, will mess up the border with the Russian Federation, China and merge just like they did in the Middle East, North Africa, created a couple of terrorist states in central Europe. Who is raking it all out now? They only know how to crap and nothing more.
  6. +2
    April 12 2017 10: 47
    DPRK everything is old, rusts, tends to zero. South Korea is all super and scored that they have one “death star” with pilot Darth Vader.
    So Hitler thought of the USSR in the forty-first.
    If we think about it, the DPRK has been supporting and modernizing its fleet for 30 years without getting anything from Russia or China, it already says a lot.
    In 1950, their Yak-9 was shot down by the reactors Shuting Star and 4 motor B-29s. They successfully destroyed low-flying aircraft with mines and aircraft hunters. Their Po-2s bombed American aerodromes. 70 years have passed since then, and if the United States went ahead during this time, the DPRK went even faster.
  7. 0
    April 12 2017 12: 15
    Something difficult to understand article. Either Pyongyang’s air defense is strong enough, or its basis is not suitable missiles. And so for each item.
  8. +1
    April 14 2017 09: 10
    My opinion may be somewhat amateurish, because I do not have reliable information, but if the United States tries to strike at the DPRK, the DPRK will probably go to combat "rapprochement" with the enemy - South Korea, so that it would be more difficult for the Americans to use their "super-high-precision" weapons. I mean the land offensive operation of the DPRK Armed Forces. It will not seem to the South Koreans and Americans. The first war of 1950-1953, they seem easy walk. And Russia needs to provide assistance to the DPRK at least through intermediaries and diplomatic support, and not to support sanctions against the DPRK. Or maybe everything will be limited to shaking the air by the parties to the conflict. An autopsy will show
  9. 0
    April 14 2017 21: 22
    There will be nothing serious! No. Trump is rattling his weapon. China will hint that it will harness for DPRK. hi Quickly everyone will find a topic for negotiation. Most likely there will be no nuclear test (a condition for negotiations). sad Everything will return to the beginning.
  10. 0
    April 15 2017 02: 01
    Here are just one thing that interests me. Where does the author get information about the training or unlearnedness of North Korean pilots. The country is closed, little is known at all. Insider type?
    1. 0
      April 24 2017 08: 05
      Where does the author get information about the training or unlearnedness of North Korean pilots.
      They have problems with fuel and spare parts, so it is logical that they fly very rarely so that at X hour there is at least something to fight, but how is this the tenth question. They would like to throw a normal EW ... then would they have more fun ...
  11. +3
    April 18 2017 07: 19
    We quote the author:
    "It is difficult to understand the meaning of maintaining a fleet of such obsolete aircraft if, due to fuel problems, their pilots have not flown for a long time. The only possible use for them is the role of attack aircraft in the front-line zone."
    And didn’t you think that very pragmatic Koreans didn’t just keep scrap metal? Why ask? And remember, the experience of the Japanese conducting World War 2 in the Pacific. They also had a terrible fuel shortage and outdated aircraft, but there were kamikazes for just one single departure. The presence of several hundred “disposable” aircraft from the North Koreans can be quite a powerful weapon, even a “weapon of despair”. The number of flight hours for accumulating experience for their fanatical pilots is not so important. They can also be taught to take flight on computer simulators (just like keeping a course and navigating in the air - the North Korean Air Force also has money for these purposes), but they don’t need to land.
    Yes, the effectiveness may not be high - but if out of ten “disposable” aircraft at least one reaches the ground, and even more so to the sea target, it will not seem to Americans and South Koreans both materially and psychologically (remember the land analogue - jihadmobiles in Syria and Iraq).
    And this, presumably, is not the only cruel surprise that the United States and its allies can expect if they nevertheless attack the DPRK ...
  12. 0
    April 18 2017 19: 21
    A skillful hand beats for sure!